groovy.transform
[Java] Annotation Type EqualsAndHashCode
java.lang.Object
groovy.transform.EqualsAndHashCode
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
@Target({ElementType.TYPE})
@GroovyASTTransformationClass("org.codehaus.groovy.transform.EqualsAndHashCodeASTTransformation")
public @interface EqualsAndHashCode
Class annotation used to assist in creating appropriate equals() and hashCode() methods.
It allows you to write classes in this shortened form:
import groovy.transform.EqualsAndHashCode
@EqualsAndHashCode
class Person {
String first, last
int age
}
def p1 = new Person(first:'John', last:'Smith', age:21)
def p2 = new Person(first:'John', last:'Smith', age:21)
assert p1 == p2
def map = [:]
map[p1] = 45
assert map[p2] == 45
The @EqualsAndHashCode annotation instructs the compiler to execute an
AST transformation which adds the necessary equals and hashCode methods to the class.
The hashCode() method is calculated using Groovy's HashCodeHelper class
which implements an algorithm similar to the one outlined in the book Effective Java.
The equals() method compares the values of the individual properties (and optionally fields)
of the class. It can also optionally call equals on the super class. Two different equals method
implementations are supported both of which support the equals contract outlined in the javadoc
for java.lang.Object
To illustrate the 'canEqual' implementation style (see http://www.artima.com/lejava/articles/equality.html
for further details), consider this class:
@EqualsAndHashCode
class IntPair {
int x, y
}
The generated equals
and canEqual
methods will be something like below:
public boolean equals(java.lang.Object other)
if (other == null) return false
if (this.is(other)) return true
if (!(other instanceof IntPair)) return false
if (!other.canEqual(this)) return false
if (x != other.x) return false
if (y != other.y) return false
return true
}
public boolean canEqual(java.lang.Object other) {
return other instanceof IntPair
}
If no further options are specified, this is the default style for @Canonical and
@EqualsAndHashCode annotated classes. The advantage of this style is that it allows inheritance
to be used in limited cases where its purpose is for overriding implementation details rather than
creating a derived type with different behavior. This is useful when using JPA Proxies for example or
as shown in the following examples:
@Canonical class IntPair { int x, y }
def p1 = new IntPair(1, 2)
// overriden getter but deemed an IntPair as far as domain is concerned
def p2 = new IntPair(1, 1) { int getY() { 2 } }
// additional helper method added through inheritance but
// deemed an IntPair as far as our domain is concerned
@InheritConstructors class IntPairWithSum extends IntPair {
def sum() { x + y }
}
def p3 = new IntPairWithSum(1, 2)
assert p1 == p2 && p2 == p1
assert p1 == p3 && p3 == p1
assert p3 == p2 && p2 == p3
Note that if you create any domain classes which don't have exactly the
same contract as IntPair
then you should provide an appropriate
equals
and canEqual
method. The easiest way to
achieve this would be to use the @Canonical or
@EqualsAndHashCode annotations as shown below:
@EqualsAndHashCode
@TupleConstructor(includeSuperProperties=true)
class IntTriple extends IntPair { int z }
def t1 = new IntTriple(1, 2, 3)
assert p1 != t1 && p2 != t1 && t1 != p3
The alternative supported style regards any kind of inheritance as creation of
a new type and is illustrated in the following example:
@EqualsAndHashCode(useCanEqual=false)
class IntPair {
int x, y
}
The generated equals method will be something like below:
public boolean equals(java.lang.Object other)
if (other == null) return false
if (this.is(other)) return true
if (IntPair != other.getClass()) return false
if (x != other.x) return false
if (y != other.y) return false
return true
}
This style is appropriate for final classes (where inheritance is not
allowed) which have only java.lang.Object
as a super class.
Most @Immutable classes fall in to this category. For such classes,
there is no need to introduce the canEqual()
method.
Note that if you explicitly set useCanEqual=false
for child nodes
in a class hierarchy but have it true
for parent nodes and you
also have callSuper=true
in the child, then your generated
equals methods will not strictly follow the equals contract.
Note that when used in the recommended fashion, the two implementations supported adhere
to the equals contract. You can provide your own equivalence relationships if you need,
e.g. for comparing instances of the IntPair
and IntTriple
classes
discussed earlier, you could provide the following method in IntPair
:
boolean hasEqualXY(other) { other.x == getX() && other.y == getY() }
Then for the objects defined earlier, the following would be true:
assert p1.hasEqualXY(t1) && t1.hasEqualXY(p1)
assert p2.hasEqualXY(t1) && t1.hasEqualXY(p2)
assert p3.hasEqualXY(t1) && t1.hasEqualXY(p3)
- Authors:
- Paul King
- See Also:
- HashCodeHelper
- Since:
- 1.8.0
Copyright © 2003-2011 The Codehaus. All rights reserved.