Introduction
Groovy…
-
is an agile and dynamic language for the Java Virtual Machine
-
builds upon the strengths of Java but has additional power features inspired by languages like Python, Ruby and Smalltalk
-
makes modern programming features available to Java developers with almost-zero learning curve
-
provides the ability to statically type check and statically compile your code for robustness and performance
-
supports Domain-Specific Languages and other compact syntax so your code becomes easy to read and maintain
-
makes writing shell and build scripts easy with its powerful processing primitives, OO abilities and an Ant DSL
-
increases developer productivity by reducing scaffolding code when developing web, GUI, database or console applications
-
simplifies testing by supporting unit testing and mocking out-of-the-box
-
seamlessly integrates with all existing Java classes and libraries
-
compiles straight to Java bytecode so you can use it anywhere you can use Java
1. Groovy Language Specification
1.1. Syntax
This chapter covers the syntax of the Groovy programming language. The grammar of the language derives from the Java grammar, but enhances it with specific constructs for Groovy, and allows certain simplifications.
1.1.1. Comments
Single-line comment
Single-line comments start with //
and can be found at any position in the line.
The characters following //
, until the end of the line, are considered part of the comment.
// a standalone single line comment
println "hello" // a comment till the end of the line
Multiline comment
A multiline comment starts with /*
and can be found at any position in the line.
The characters following /*
will be considered part of the comment, including new line characters,
up to the first */
closing the comment.
Multiline comments can thus be put at the end of a statement, or even inside a statement.
/* a standalone multiline comment
spanning two lines */
println "hello" /* a multiline comment starting
at the end of a statement */
println 1 /* one */ + 2 /* two */
Groovydoc comment
Similarly to multiline comments, Groovydoc comments are multiline, but start with /**
and end with */
.
Lines following the first Groovydoc comment line can optionally start with a star *
.
Those comments are associated with:
-
type definitions (classes, interfaces, enums, annotations),
-
fields and properties definitions
-
methods definitions
Although the compiler will not complain about Groovydoc comments not being associated with the above language elements, you should prepend those constructs with the comment right before it.
/**
* A Class description
*/
class Person {
/** the name of the person */
String name
/**
* Creates a greeting method for a certain person.
*
* @param otherPerson the person to greet
* @return a greeting message
*/
String greet(String otherPerson) {
"Hello ${otherPerson}"
}
}
Groovydoc follows the same conventions as Java’s own Javadoc. So you’ll be able to use the same tags as with Javadoc.
In addition, Groovy supports Runtime Groovydoc since 3.0.0, i.e. Groovydoc can be retained at runtime.
Runtime Groovydoc is disabled by default. It can be enabled by adding JVM option -Dgroovy.attach.runtime.groovydoc=true
|
The Runtime Groovydoc starts with /**@
and ends with */
, for example:
/**@
* Some class groovydoc for Foo
*/
class Foo {
/**@
* Some method groovydoc for bar
*/
void bar() {
}
}
assert Foo.class.groovydoc.content.contains('Some class groovydoc for Foo') (1)
assert Foo.class.getMethod('bar', new Class[0]).groovydoc.content.contains('Some method groovydoc for bar') (2)
1 | Get the runtime groovydoc for class Foo |
2 | Get the runtime groovydoc for method bar |
Shebang line
Beside the single-line comment, there is a special line comment, often called the shebang line understood by UNIX systems
which allows scripts to be run directly from the command-line, provided you have installed the Groovy distribution
and the groovy
command is available on the PATH
.
#!/usr/bin/env groovy
println "Hello from the shebang line"
The # character must be the first character of the file. Any indentation would yield a compilation error.
|
1.1.2. Keywords
The following list represents all the keywords of the Groovy language:
as |
assert |
break |
case |
catch |
class |
const |
continue |
def |
default |
do |
else |
enum |
extends |
false |
finally |
for |
goto |
if |
implements |
import |
in |
instanceof |
interface |
new |
null |
package |
return |
super |
switch |
this |
throw |
throws |
trait |
true |
try |
var |
while |
1.1.3. Identifiers
Normal identifiers
Identifiers start with a letter, a dollar or an underscore. They cannot start with a number.
A letter can be in the following ranges:
-
'a' to 'z' (lowercase ascii letter)
-
'A' to 'Z' (uppercase ascii letter)
-
'\u00C0' to '\u00D6'
-
'\u00D8' to '\u00F6'
-
'\u00F8' to '\u00FF'
-
'\u0100' to '\uFFFE'
Then following characters can contain letters and numbers.
Here are a few examples of valid identifiers (here, variable names):
def name
def item3
def with_underscore
def $dollarStart
But the following ones are invalid identifiers:
def 3tier
def a+b
def a#b
All keywords are also valid identifiers when following a dot:
foo.as
foo.assert
foo.break
foo.case
foo.catch
Quoted identifiers
Quoted identifiers appear after the dot of a dotted expression.
For instance, the name
part of the person.name
expression can be quoted with person."name"
or person.'name'
.
This is particularly interesting when certain identifiers contain illegal characters that are forbidden by the Java Language Specification,
but which are allowed by Groovy when quoted. For example, characters like a dash, a space, an exclamation mark, etc.
def map = [:]
map."an identifier with a space and double quotes" = "ALLOWED"
map.'with-dash-signs-and-single-quotes' = "ALLOWED"
assert map."an identifier with a space and double quotes" == "ALLOWED"
assert map.'with-dash-signs-and-single-quotes' == "ALLOWED"
As we shall see in the following section on strings, Groovy provides different string literals. All kind of strings are actually allowed after the dot:
map.'single quote'
map."double quote"
map.'''triple single quote'''
map."""triple double quote"""
map./slashy string/
map.$/dollar slashy string/$
There’s a difference between plain character strings and Groovy’s GStrings (interpolated strings), as in that the latter case, the interpolated values are inserted in the final string for evaluating the whole identifier:
def firstname = "Homer"
map."Simpson-${firstname}" = "Homer Simpson"
assert map.'Simpson-Homer' == "Homer Simpson"
1.1.4. Strings
Text literals are represented in the form of chain of characters called strings.
Groovy lets you instantiate java.lang.String
objects, as well as GStrings (groovy.lang.GString
)
which are also called interpolated strings in other programming languages.
Single-quoted string
Single-quoted strings are a series of characters surrounded by single quotes:
'a single-quoted string'
Single-quoted strings are plain java.lang.String and don’t support interpolation.
|
String concatenation
All the Groovy strings can be concatenated with the +
operator:
assert 'ab' == 'a' + 'b'
Triple-single-quoted string
Triple-single-quoted strings are a series of characters surrounded by triplets of single quotes:
'''a triple-single-quoted string'''
Triple-single-quoted strings are plain java.lang.String and don’t support interpolation.
|
Triple-single-quoted strings may span multiple lines. The content of the string can cross line boundaries without the need to split the string in several pieces and without concatenation or newline escape characters:
def aMultilineString = '''line one
line two
line three'''
If your code is indented, for example in the body of the method of a class, your string will contain the whitespace of the indentation.
The Groovy Development Kit contains methods for stripping out the indentation with the String#stripIndent()
method,
and with the String#stripMargin()
method that takes a delimiter character to identify the text to remove from the beginning of a string.
When creating a string as follows:
def startingAndEndingWithANewline = '''
line one
line two
line three
'''
You will notice that the resulting string contains a newline character as first character. It is possible to strip that character by escaping the newline with a backslash:
def strippedFirstNewline = '''\
line one
line two
line three
'''
assert !strippedFirstNewline.startsWith('\n')
Escaping special characters
You can escape single quotes with the backslash character to avoid terminating the string literal:
'an escaped single quote: \' needs a backslash'
And you can escape the escape character itself with a double backslash:
'an escaped escape character: \\ needs a double backslash'
Some special characters also use the backslash as escape character:
Escape sequence | Character |
---|---|
\b |
backspace |
\f |
formfeed |
\n |
newline |
\r |
carriage return |
\s |
single space |
\t |
tabulation |
\\ |
backslash |
\' |
single quote within a single-quoted string (and optional for triple-single-quoted and double-quoted strings) |
\" |
double quote within a double-quoted string (and optional for triple-double-quoted and single-quoted strings) |
We’ll see some more escaping details when it comes to other types of strings discussed later.
Double-quoted string
Double-quoted strings are a series of characters surrounded by double quotes:
"a double-quoted string"
Double-quoted strings are plain java.lang.String if there’s no interpolated expression,
but are groovy.lang.GString instances if interpolation is present.
|
To escape a double quote, you can use the backslash character: "A double quote: \"". |
String interpolation
Any Groovy expression can be interpolated in all string literals, apart from single and triple-single-quoted strings.
Interpolation is the act of replacing a placeholder in the string with its value upon evaluation of the string.
The placeholder expressions are surrounded by ${}
. The curly braces may be omitted for unambiguous dotted expressions,
i.e. we can use just a $ prefix in those cases.
If the GString is ever passed to a method taking a String, the expression value inside the placeholder
is evaluated to its string representation (by calling toString()
on that expression) and the resulting
String is passed to the method.
Here, we have a string with a placeholder referencing a local variable:
def name = 'Guillaume' // a plain string
def greeting = "Hello ${name}"
assert greeting.toString() == 'Hello Guillaume'
Any Groovy expression is valid, as we can see in this example with an arithmetic expression:
def sum = "The sum of 2 and 3 equals ${2 + 3}"
assert sum.toString() == 'The sum of 2 and 3 equals 5'
Not only are expressions allowed in between the ${} placeholder, but so are statements. However, a statement’s value is just null .
So if several statements are inserted in that placeholder, the last one should somehow return a meaningful value to be inserted.
For instance, "The sum of 1 and 2 is equal to ${def a = 1; def b = 2; a + b}" is supported and works as expected but a good practice is usually to stick to simple expressions inside GString placeholders.
|
In addition to ${}
placeholders, we can also use a lone $
sign prefixing a dotted expression:
def person = [name: 'Guillaume', age: 36]
assert "$person.name is $person.age years old" == 'Guillaume is 36 years old'
But only dotted expressions of the form a.b
, a.b.c
, etc, are valid. Expressions containing parentheses like method calls,
curly braces for closures, dots which aren’t part of a property expression or arithmetic operators would be invalid.
Given the following variable definition of a number:
def number = 3.14
The following statement will throw a groovy.lang.MissingPropertyException
because Groovy believes you’re trying to access the toString
property of that number, which doesn’t exist:
shouldFail(MissingPropertyException) {
println "$number.toString()"
}
You can think of "$number.toString()" as being interpreted by the parser as "${number.toString}()" .
|
Similarly, if the expression is ambiguous, you need to keep the curly braces:
String thing = 'treasure'
assert 'The x-coordinate of the treasure is represented by treasure.x' ==
"The x-coordinate of the $thing is represented by $thing.x" // <= Not allowed: ambiguous!!
assert 'The x-coordinate of the treasure is represented by treasure.x' ==
"The x-coordinate of the $thing is represented by ${thing}.x" // <= Curly braces required
If you need to escape the $
or ${}
placeholders in a GString so they appear as is without interpolation,
you just need to use a \
backslash character to escape the dollar sign:
assert '$5' == "\$5"
assert '${name}' == "\${name}"
Special case of interpolating closure expressions
So far, we’ve seen we could interpolate arbitrary expressions inside the ${}
placeholder, but there is a special case and notation for closure expressions. When the placeholder contains an arrow, ${→}
, the expression is actually a closure expression — you can think of it as a closure with a dollar prepended in front of it:
def sParameterLessClosure = "1 + 2 == ${-> 3}" (1)
assert sParameterLessClosure == '1 + 2 == 3'
def sOneParamClosure = "1 + 2 == ${ w -> w << 3}" (2)
assert sOneParamClosure == '1 + 2 == 3'
1 | The closure is a parameterless closure which doesn’t take arguments. |
2 | Here, the closure takes a single java.io.StringWriter argument, to which you can append content with the << leftShift operator.
In either case, both placeholders are embedded closures. |
In appearance, it looks like a more verbose way of defining expressions to be interpolated, but closures have an interesting advantage over mere expressions: lazy evaluation.
Let’s consider the following sample:
def number = 1 (1)
def eagerGString = "value == ${number}"
def lazyGString = "value == ${ -> number }"
assert eagerGString == "value == 1" (2)
assert lazyGString == "value == 1" (3)
number = 2 (4)
assert eagerGString == "value == 1" (5)
assert lazyGString == "value == 2" (6)
1 | We define a number variable containing 1 that we then interpolate within two GStrings,
as an expression in eagerGString and as a closure in lazyGString . |
2 | We expect the resulting string to contain the same string value of 1 for eagerGString . |
3 | Similarly for lazyGString |
4 | Then we change the value of the variable to a new number |
5 | With a plain interpolated expression, the value was actually bound at the time of creation of the GString. |
6 | But with a closure expression, the closure is called upon each coercion of the GString into String, resulting in an updated string containing the new number value. |
An embedded closure expression taking more than one parameter will generate an exception at runtime. Only closures with zero or one parameters are allowed. |
Interoperability with Java
When a method (whether implemented in Java or Groovy) expects a java.lang.String
,
but we pass a groovy.lang.GString
instance,
the toString()
method of the GString is automatically and transparently called.
String takeString(String message) { (4)
assert message instanceof String (5)
return message
}
def message = "The message is ${'hello'}" (1)
assert message instanceof GString (2)
def result = takeString(message) (3)
assert result instanceof String
assert result == 'The message is hello'
1 | We create a GString variable |
2 | We double check it’s an instance of the GString |
3 | We then pass that GString to a method taking a String as parameter |
4 | The signature of the takeString() method explicitly says its sole parameter is a String |
5 | We also verify that the parameter is indeed a String and not a GString. |
GString and String hashCodes
Although interpolated strings can be used in lieu of plain Java strings, they differ with strings in a particular way: their hashCodes are different. Plain Java strings are immutable, whereas the resulting String representation of a GString can vary, depending on its interpolated values. Even for the same resulting string, GStrings and Strings don’t have the same hashCode.
assert "one: ${1}".hashCode() != "one: 1".hashCode()
GString and Strings having different hashCode values, using GString as Map keys should be avoided, especially if we try to retrieve an associated value with a String instead of a GString.
def key = "a"
def m = ["${key}": "letter ${key}"] (1)
assert m["a"] == null (2)
1 | The map is created with an initial pair whose key is a GString |
2 | When we try to fetch the value with a String key, we will not find it, as Strings and GString have different hashCode values |
Triple-double-quoted string
Triple-double-quoted strings behave like double-quoted strings, with the addition that they are multiline, like the triple-single-quoted strings.
def name = 'Groovy'
def template = """
Dear Mr ${name},
You're the winner of the lottery!
Yours sincerly,
Dave
"""
assert template.toString().contains('Groovy')
Neither double quotes nor single quotes need be escaped in triple-double-quoted strings. |
Slashy string
Beyond the usual quoted strings, Groovy offers slashy strings, which use /
as the opening and closing delimiter.
Slashy strings are particularly useful for defining regular expressions and patterns,
as there is no need to escape backslashes.
Example of a slashy string:
def fooPattern = /.*foo.*/
assert fooPattern == '.*foo.*'
Only forward slashes need to be escaped with a backslash:
def escapeSlash = /The character \/ is a forward slash/
assert escapeSlash == 'The character / is a forward slash'
Slashy strings are multiline:
def multilineSlashy = /one
two
three/
assert multilineSlashy.contains('\n')
Slashy strings can be thought of as just another way to define a GString but with different escaping rules. They hence support interpolation:
def color = 'blue'
def interpolatedSlashy = /a ${color} car/
assert interpolatedSlashy == 'a blue car'
Special cases
An empty slashy string cannot be represented with a double forward slash, as it’s understood by the Groovy parser as a line comment. That’s why the following assert would actually not compile as it would look like a non-terminated statement:
assert '' == //
As slashy strings were mostly designed to make regexp easier so a few things that
are errors in GStrings like $()
or $5
will work with slashy strings.
Remember that escaping backslashes is not required. An alternative way of thinking of this is
that in fact escaping is not supported. The slashy string /\t/
won’t contain a tab but instead
a backslash followed by the character 't'. Escaping is only allowed for the slash character, i.e. /\/folder/
will be a slashy string containing '/folder'
. A consequence of slash escaping is that a slashy string
can’t end with a backslash. Otherwise that will escape the slashy string terminator.
You can instead use a special trick, /ends with slash ${'\'}/
. But best just avoid using a slashy string in such a case.
Dollar slashy string
Dollar slashy strings are multiline GStrings delimited with an opening $/
and and a closing /$
.
The escaping character is the dollar sign, and it can escape another dollar, or a forward slash.
But both dollar and forward slashes don’t need to be escaped, except to escape the dollar of a string
subsequence that would start like a GString placeholder sequence, or if you need to escape a sequence
that would start like a closing dollar slashy string delimiter.
Here’s an example:
def name = "Guillaume"
def date = "April, 1st"
def dollarSlashy = $/
Hello $name,
today we're ${date}.
$ dollar sign
$$ escaped dollar sign
\ backslash
/ forward slash
$/ escaped forward slash
$$$/ escaped opening dollar slashy
$/$$ escaped closing dollar slashy
/$
assert [
'Guillaume',
'April, 1st',
'$ dollar sign',
'$ escaped dollar sign',
'\\ backslash',
'/ forward slash',
'/ escaped forward slash',
'$/ escaped opening dollar slashy',
'/$ escaped closing dollar slashy'
].every { dollarSlashy.contains(it) }
It was created to overcome some of the limitations of the slashy string escaping rules. Use it when its escaping rules suit your string contents (typically if it has some slashes you don’t want to escape).
String summary table
String name |
String syntax |
Interpolated |
Multiline |
Escape character |
Single-quoted |
|
|
||
Triple-single-quoted |
|
|
||
Double-quoted |
|
|
||
Triple-double-quoted |
|
|
||
Slashy |
|
|
||
Dollar slashy |
|
|
Characters
Unlike Java, Groovy doesn’t have an explicit character literal. However, you can be explicit about making a Groovy string an actual character, by three different means:
char c1 = 'A' (1)
assert c1 instanceof Character
def c2 = 'B' as char (2)
assert c2 instanceof Character
def c3 = (char)'C' (3)
assert c3 instanceof Character
1 | by being explicit when declaring a variable holding the character by specifying the char type |
2 | by using type coercion with the as operator |
3 | by using a cast to char operation |
The first option 1 is interesting when the character is held in a variable, while the other two (2 and 3) are more interesting when a char value must be passed as argument of a method call. |
1.1.5. Numbers
Groovy supports different kinds of integral literals and decimal literals, backed by the usual Number
types of Java.
Integral literals
The integral literal types are the same as in Java:
-
byte
-
char
-
short
-
int
-
long
-
java.lang.BigInteger
You can create integral numbers of those types with the following declarations:
// primitive types
byte b = 1
char c = 2
short s = 3
int i = 4
long l = 5
// infinite precision
BigInteger bi = 6
If you use optional typing by using the def
keyword, the type of the integral number will vary:
it’ll adapt to the capacity of the type that can hold that number.
For positive numbers:
def a = 1
assert a instanceof Integer
// Integer.MAX_VALUE
def b = 2147483647
assert b instanceof Integer
// Integer.MAX_VALUE + 1
def c = 2147483648
assert c instanceof Long
// Long.MAX_VALUE
def d = 9223372036854775807
assert d instanceof Long
// Long.MAX_VALUE + 1
def e = 9223372036854775808
assert e instanceof BigInteger
As well as for negative numbers:
def na = -1
assert na instanceof Integer
// Integer.MIN_VALUE
def nb = -2147483648
assert nb instanceof Integer
// Integer.MIN_VALUE - 1
def nc = -2147483649
assert nc instanceof Long
// Long.MIN_VALUE
def nd = -9223372036854775808
assert nd instanceof Long
// Long.MIN_VALUE - 1
def ne = -9223372036854775809
assert ne instanceof BigInteger
Alternative non-base 10 representations
Numbers can also be represented in binary, octal, hexadecimal and decimal bases.
Binary numbers start with a 0b
prefix:
int xInt = 0b10101111
assert xInt == 175
short xShort = 0b11001001
assert xShort == 201 as short
byte xByte = 0b11
assert xByte == 3 as byte
long xLong = 0b101101101101
assert xLong == 2925l
BigInteger xBigInteger = 0b111100100001
assert xBigInteger == 3873g
int xNegativeInt = -0b10101111
assert xNegativeInt == -175
Octal numbers are specified in the typical format of 0
followed by octal digits.
int xInt = 077
assert xInt == 63
short xShort = 011
assert xShort == 9 as short
byte xByte = 032
assert xByte == 26 as byte
long xLong = 0246
assert xLong == 166l
BigInteger xBigInteger = 01111
assert xBigInteger == 585g
int xNegativeInt = -077
assert xNegativeInt == -63
Hexadecimal numbers are specified in the typical format of 0x
followed by hex digits.
int xInt = 0x77
assert xInt == 119
short xShort = 0xaa
assert xShort == 170 as short
byte xByte = 0x3a
assert xByte == 58 as byte
long xLong = 0xffff
assert xLong == 65535l
BigInteger xBigInteger = 0xaaaa
assert xBigInteger == 43690g
Double xDouble = new Double('0x1.0p0')
assert xDouble == 1.0d
int xNegativeInt = -0x77
assert xNegativeInt == -119
Decimal literals
The decimal literal types are the same as in Java:
-
float
-
double
-
java.lang.BigDecimal
You can create decimal numbers of those types with the following declarations:
// primitive types
float f = 1.234
double d = 2.345
// infinite precision
BigDecimal bd = 3.456
Decimals can use exponents, with the e
or E
exponent letter, followed by an optional sign,
and a integral number representing the exponent:
assert 1e3 == 1_000.0
assert 2E4 == 20_000.0
assert 3e+1 == 30.0
assert 4E-2 == 0.04
assert 5e-1 == 0.5
Conveniently for exact decimal number calculations, Groovy choses java.lang.BigDecimal
as its decimal number type.
In addition, both float
and double
are supported, but require an explicit type declaration, type coercion or suffix.
Even if BigDecimal
is the default for decimal numbers, such literals are accepted in methods or closures taking float
or double
as parameter types.
Decimal numbers can’t be represented using a binary, octal or hexadecimal representation. |
Underscore in literals
When writing long literal numbers, it’s harder on the eye to figure out how some numbers are grouped together, for example with groups of thousands, of words, etc. By allowing you to place underscore in number literals, it’s easier to spot those groups:
long creditCardNumber = 1234_5678_9012_3456L
long socialSecurityNumbers = 999_99_9999L
double monetaryAmount = 12_345_132.12
long hexBytes = 0xFF_EC_DE_5E
long hexWords = 0xFFEC_DE5E
long maxLong = 0x7fff_ffff_ffff_ffffL
long alsoMaxLong = 9_223_372_036_854_775_807L
long bytes = 0b11010010_01101001_10010100_10010010
Number type suffixes
We can force a number (including binary, octals and hexadecimals) to have a specific type by giving a suffix (see table below), either uppercase or lowercase.
Type | Suffix |
---|---|
BigInteger |
|
Long |
|
Integer |
|
BigDecimal |
|
Double |
|
Float |
|
Examples:
assert 42I == new Integer('42')
assert 42i == new Integer('42') // lowercase i more readable
assert 123L == new Long("123") // uppercase L more readable
assert 2147483648 == new Long('2147483648') // Long type used, value too large for an Integer
assert 456G == new BigInteger('456')
assert 456g == new BigInteger('456')
assert 123.45 == new BigDecimal('123.45') // default BigDecimal type used
assert 1.200065D == new Double('1.200065')
assert 1.234F == new Float('1.234')
assert 1.23E23D == new Double('1.23E23')
assert 0b1111L.class == Long // binary
assert 0xFFi.class == Integer // hexadecimal
assert 034G.class == BigInteger // octal
Math operations
Although operators are covered later on, it’s important to discuss the behavior of math operations and what their resulting types are.
Division and power binary operations aside (covered below),
-
binary operations between
byte
,char
,short
andint
result inint
-
binary operations involving
long
withbyte
,char
,short
andint
result inlong
-
binary operations involving
BigInteger
and any other integral type result inBigInteger
-
binary operations involving
BigDecimal
withbyte
,char
,short
,int
andBigInteger
result inBigDecimal
-
binary operations between
float
,double
andBigDecimal
result indouble
-
binary operations between two
BigDecimal
result inBigDecimal
The following table summarizes those rules:
byte | char | short | int | long | BigInteger | float | double | BigDecimal | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
byte |
int |
int |
int |
int |
long |
BigInteger |
double |
double |
BigDecimal |
char |
int |
int |
int |
long |
BigInteger |
double |
double |
BigDecimal |
|
short |
int |
int |
long |
BigInteger |
double |
double |
BigDecimal |
||
int |
int |
long |
BigInteger |
double |
double |
BigDecimal |
|||
long |
long |
BigInteger |
double |
double |
BigDecimal |
||||
BigInteger |
BigInteger |
double |
double |
BigDecimal |
|||||
float |
double |
double |
double |
||||||
double |
double |
double |
|||||||
BigDecimal |
BigDecimal |
Thanks to Groovy’s operator overloading, the usual arithmetic operators work as well with BigInteger and BigDecimal ,
unlike in Java where you have to use explicit methods for operating on those numbers.
|
The case of the division operator
The division operators /
(and /=
for division and assignment) produce a double
result
if either operand is a float
or double
, and a BigDecimal
result otherwise
(when both operands are any combination of an integral type short
, char
, byte
, int
, long
,
BigInteger
or BigDecimal
).
BigDecimal
division is performed with the divide()
method if the division is exact
(i.e. yielding a result that can be represented within the bounds of the same precision and scale),
or using a MathContext
with a precision
of the maximum of the two operands' precision plus an extra precision of 10,
and a scale
of the maximum of 10 and the maximum of the operands' scale.
For integer division like in Java, you should use the intdiv() method,
as Groovy doesn’t provide a dedicated integer division operator symbol.
|
The case of the power operator
The power operation is represented by the **
operator, with two parameters: the base and the exponent.
The result of the power operation depends on its operands, and the result of the operation
(in particular if the result can be represented as an integral value).
The following rules are used by Groovy’s power operation to determine the resulting type:
-
If the exponent is a decimal value
-
if the result can be represented as an
Integer
, then return anInteger
-
else if the result can be represented as a
Long
, then return aLong
-
otherwise return a
Double
-
-
If the exponent is an integral value
-
if the exponent is strictly negative, then return an
Integer
,Long
orDouble
if the result value fits in that type -
if the exponent is positive or zero
-
if the base is a
BigDecimal
, then return aBigDecimal
result value -
if the base is a
BigInteger
, then return aBigInteger
result value -
if the base is an
Integer
, then return anInteger
if the result value fits in it, otherwise aBigInteger
-
if the base is a
Long
, then return aLong
if the result value fits in it, otherwise aBigInteger
-
-
We can illustrate those rules with a few examples:
// base and exponent are ints and the result can be represented by an Integer
assert 2 ** 3 instanceof Integer // 8
assert 10 ** 9 instanceof Integer // 1_000_000_000
// the base is a long, so fit the result in a Long
// (although it could have fit in an Integer)
assert 5L ** 2 instanceof Long // 25
// the result can't be represented as an Integer or Long, so return a BigInteger
assert 100 ** 10 instanceof BigInteger // 10e20
assert 1234 ** 123 instanceof BigInteger // 170515806212727042875...
// the base is a BigDecimal and the exponent a negative int
// but the result can be represented as an Integer
assert 0.5 ** -2 instanceof Integer // 4
// the base is an int, and the exponent a negative float
// but again, the result can be represented as an Integer
assert 1 ** -0.3f instanceof Integer // 1
// the base is an int, and the exponent a negative int
// but the result will be calculated as a Double
// (both base and exponent are actually converted to doubles)
assert 10 ** -1 instanceof Double // 0.1
// the base is a BigDecimal, and the exponent is an int, so return a BigDecimal
assert 1.2 ** 10 instanceof BigDecimal // 6.1917364224
// the base is a float or double, and the exponent is an int
// but the result can only be represented as a Double value
assert 3.4f ** 5 instanceof Double // 454.35430372146965
assert 5.6d ** 2 instanceof Double // 31.359999999999996
// the exponent is a decimal value
// and the result can only be represented as a Double value
assert 7.8 ** 1.9 instanceof Double // 49.542708423868476
assert 2 ** 0.1f instanceof Double // 1.0717734636432956
1.1.6. Booleans
Boolean is a special data type that is used to represent truth values: true
and false
.
Use this data type for simple flags that track true/false conditions.
Boolean values can be stored in variables, assigned into fields, just like any other data type:
def myBooleanVariable = true
boolean untypedBooleanVar = false
booleanField = true
true
and false
are the only two primitive boolean values.
But more complex boolean expressions can be represented using logical operators.
In addition, Groovy has special rules (often referred to as Groovy Truth) for coercing non-boolean objects to a boolean value.
1.1.7. Lists
Groovy uses a comma-separated list of values, surrounded by square brackets, to denote lists.
Groovy lists are plain JDK java.util.List
, as Groovy doesn’t define its own collection classes.
The concrete list implementation used when defining list literals are java.util.ArrayList
by default,
unless you decide to specify otherwise, as we shall see later on.
def numbers = [1, 2, 3] (1)
assert numbers instanceof List (2)
assert numbers.size() == 3 (3)
1 | We define a list numbers delimited by commas and surrounded by square brackets, and we assign that list into a variable |
2 | The list is an instance of Java’s java.util.List interface |
3 | The size of the list can be queried with the size() method, and shows our list contains 3 elements |
In the above example, we used a homogeneous list, but you can also create lists containing values of heterogeneous types:
def heterogeneous = [1, "a", true] (1)
1 | Our list here contains a number, a string and a boolean value |
We mentioned that by default, list literals are actually instances of java.util.ArrayList
,
but it is possible to use a different backing type for our lists,
thanks to using type coercion with the as
operator, or with explicit type declaration for your variables:
def arrayList = [1, 2, 3]
assert arrayList instanceof java.util.ArrayList
def linkedList = [2, 3, 4] as LinkedList (1)
assert linkedList instanceof java.util.LinkedList
LinkedList otherLinked = [3, 4, 5] (2)
assert otherLinked instanceof java.util.LinkedList
1 | We use coercion with the as operator to explicitly request a java.util.LinkedList implementation |
2 | We can say that the variable holding the list literal is of type java.util.LinkedList |
You can access elements of the list with the []
subscript operator (both for reading and setting values)
with positive indices or negative indices to access elements from the end of the list, as well as with ranges,
and use the <<
leftShift operator to append elements to a list:
def letters = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd']
assert letters[0] == 'a' (1)
assert letters[1] == 'b'
assert letters[-1] == 'd' (2)
assert letters[-2] == 'c'
letters[2] = 'C' (3)
assert letters[2] == 'C'
letters << 'e' (4)
assert letters[ 4] == 'e'
assert letters[-1] == 'e'
assert letters[1, 3] == ['b', 'd'] (5)
assert letters[2..4] == ['C', 'd', 'e'] (6)
1 | Access the first element of the list (zero-based counting) |
2 | Access the last element of the list with a negative index: -1 is the first element from the end of the list |
3 | Use an assignment to set a new value for the third element of the list |
4 | Use the << leftShift operator to append an element at the end of the list |
5 | Access two elements at once, returning a new list containing those two elements |
6 | Use a range to access a range of values from the list, from a start to an end element position |
As lists can be heterogeneous in nature, lists can also contain other lists to create multi-dimensional lists:
def multi = [[0, 1], [2, 3]] (1)
assert multi[1][0] == 2 (2)
1 | Define a list of list of numbers |
2 | Access the second element of the top-most list, and the first element of the inner list |
1.1.8. Arrays
Groovy reuses the list notation for arrays, but to make such literals arrays, you need to explicitely define the type of the array through coercion or type declaration.
String[] arrStr = ['Ananas', 'Banana', 'Kiwi'] (1)
assert arrStr instanceof String[] (2)
assert !(arrStr instanceof List)
def numArr = [1, 2, 3] as int[] (3)
assert numArr instanceof int[] (4)
assert numArr.size() == 3
1 | Define an array of strings using explicit variable type declaration |
2 | Assert that we created an array of strings |
3 | Create an array of ints with the as operator |
4 | Assert that we created an array of primitive ints |
You can also create multi-dimensional arrays:
def matrix3 = new Integer[3][3] (1)
assert matrix3.size() == 3
Integer[][] matrix2 (2)
matrix2 = [[1, 2], [3, 4]]
assert matrix2 instanceof Integer[][]
1 | You can define the bounds of a new array |
2 | Or declare an array without specifying its bounds |
Access to elements of an array follows the same notation as for lists:
String[] names = ['Cédric', 'Guillaume', 'Jochen', 'Paul']
assert names[0] == 'Cédric' (1)
names[2] = 'Blackdrag' (2)
assert names[2] == 'Blackdrag'
1 | Retrieve the first element of the array |
2 | Set the value of the third element of the array to a new value |
Java-style array initialization
Groovy has always supported literal list/array definitions using square brackets and has avoided Java-style curly braces so as not to conflict with closure definitions. In the case where the curly braces come immediately after an array type declaration however, there is no ambiguity with closure definitions, so Groovy 3 and above support that variant of the Java array initialization expression.
Examples:
def primes = new int[] {2, 3, 5, 7, 11}
assert primes.size() == 5 && primes.sum() == 28
assert primes.class.name == '[I'
def pets = new String[] {'cat', 'dog'}
assert pets.size() == 2 && pets.sum() == 'catdog'
assert pets.class.name == '[Ljava.lang.String;'
// traditional Groovy alternative still supported
String[] groovyBooks = [ 'Groovy in Action', 'Making Java Groovy' ]
assert groovyBooks.every{ it.contains('Groovy') }
1.1.9. Maps
Sometimes called dictionaries or associative arrays in other languages, Groovy features maps. Maps associate keys to values, separating keys and values with colons, and each key/value pairs with commas, and the whole keys and values surrounded by square brackets.
def colors = [red: '#FF0000', green: '#00FF00', blue: '#0000FF'] (1)
assert colors['red'] == '#FF0000' (2)
assert colors.green == '#00FF00' (3)
colors['pink'] = '#FF00FF' (4)
colors.yellow = '#FFFF00' (5)
assert colors.pink == '#FF00FF'
assert colors['yellow'] == '#FFFF00'
assert colors instanceof java.util.LinkedHashMap
1 | We define a map of string color names, associated with their hexadecimal-coded html colors |
2 | We use the subscript notation to check the content associated with the red key |
3 | We can also use the property notation to assert the color green’s hexadecimal representation |
4 | Similarly, we can use the subscript notation to add a new key/value pair |
5 | Or the property notation, to add the yellow color |
When using names for the keys, we actually define string keys in the map. |
Groovy creates maps that are actually instances of java.util.LinkedHashMap .
|
If you try to access a key which is not present in the map:
assert colors.unknown == null
You will retrieve a null
result.
In the examples above, we used string keys, but you can also use values of other types as keys:
def numbers = [1: 'one', 2: 'two']
assert numbers[1] == 'one'
Here, we used numbers as keys, as numbers can unambiguously be recognized as numbers, so Groovy will not create a string key like in our previous examples. But consider the case you want to pass a variable in lieu of the key, to have the value of that variable become the key:
def key = 'name'
def person = [key: 'Guillaume'] (1)
assert !person.containsKey('name') (2)
assert person.containsKey('key') (3)
1 | The key associated with the 'Guillaume' name will actually be the "key" string, not the value associated with the key variable |
2 | The map doesn’t contain the 'name' key |
3 | Instead, the map contains a 'key' key |
You can also pass quoted strings as well as keys: ["name": "Guillaume"]. This is mandatory if your key string isn’t a valid identifier, for example if you wanted to create a string key containing a hash like in: ["street-name": "Main street"]. |
When you need to pass variable values as keys in your map definitions, you must surround the variable or expression with parentheses:
person = [(key): 'Guillaume'] (1)
assert person.containsKey('name') (2)
assert !person.containsKey('key') (3)
1 | This time, we surround the key variable with parentheses, to instruct the parser we are passing a variable rather than defining a string key |
2 | The map does contain the name key |
3 | But the map doesn’t contain the key key as before |
1.2. Operators
This chapter covers the operators of the Groovy programming language.
1.2.1. Arithmetic operators
Groovy supports the usual familiar arithmetic operators you find in mathematics and in other programming languages like Java. All the Java arithmetic operators are supported. Let’s go through them in the following examples.
Normal arithmetic operators
The following binary arithmetic operators are available in Groovy:
Operator | Purpose | Remarks |
---|---|---|
|
addition |
|
|
subtraction |
|
|
multiplication |
|
|
division |
Use |
|
remainder |
|
|
power |
See the section about the power operation for more information on the return type of the operation. |
Here are a few examples of usage of those operators:
assert 1 + 2 == 3
assert 4 - 3 == 1
assert 3 * 5 == 15
assert 3 / 2 == 1.5
assert 10 % 3 == 1
assert 2 ** 3 == 8
Unary operators
The +
and -
operators are also available as unary operators:
assert +3 == 3
assert -4 == 0 - 4
assert -(-1) == 1 (1)
1 | Note the usage of parentheses to surround an expression to apply the unary minus to that surrounded expression. |
In terms of unary arithmetics operators, the ++
(increment) and --
(decrement) operators are available,
both in prefix and postfix notation:
def a = 2
def b = a++ * 3 (1)
assert a == 3 && b == 6
def c = 3
def d = c-- * 2 (2)
assert c == 2 && d == 6
def e = 1
def f = ++e + 3 (3)
assert e == 2 && f == 5
def g = 4
def h = --g + 1 (4)
assert g == 3 && h == 4
1 | The postfix increment will increment a after the expression has been evaluated and assigned into b |
2 | The postfix decrement will decrement c after the expression has been evaluated and assigned into d |
3 | The prefix increment will increment e before the expression is evaluated and assigned into f |
4 | The prefix decrement will decrement g before the expression is evaluated and assigned into h |
For the unary not operator on Booleans, see Conditional operators.
Assignment arithmetic operators
The binary arithmetic operators we have seen above are also available in an assignment form:
-
+=
-
-=
-
*=
-
/=
-
%=
-
**=
Let’s see them in action:
def a = 4
a += 3
assert a == 7
def b = 5
b -= 3
assert b == 2
def c = 5
c *= 3
assert c == 15
def d = 10
d /= 2
assert d == 5
def e = 10
e %= 3
assert e == 1
def f = 3
f **= 2
assert f == 9
1.2.2. Relational operators
Relational operators allow comparisons between objects, to know if two objects are the same or different, or if one is greater than, less than, or equal to the other.
The following operators are available:
Operator | Purpose |
---|---|
|
equal |
|
different |
|
less than |
|
less than or equal |
|
greater than |
|
greater than or equal |
|
identical (Since Groovy 3.0.0) |
|
not identical (Since Groovy 3.0.0) |
Here are some examples of simple number comparisons using these operators:
assert 1 + 2 == 3
assert 3 != 4
assert -2 < 3
assert 2 <= 2
assert 3 <= 4
assert 5 > 1
assert 5 >= -2
Both ===
and !==
are supported which are the same as calling the is()
method,
and negating a call to the is()
method respectively.
import groovy.transform.EqualsAndHashCode
@EqualsAndHashCode
class Creature { String type }
def cat = new Creature(type: 'cat')
def copyCat = cat
def lion = new Creature(type: 'cat')
assert cat.equals(lion) // Java logical equality
assert cat == lion // Groovy shorthand operator
assert cat.is(copyCat) // Groovy identity
assert cat === copyCat // operator shorthand
assert cat !== lion // negated operator shorthand
1.2.3. Logical operators
Groovy offers three logical operators for boolean expressions:
-
&&
: logical "and" -
||
: logical "or" -
!
: logical "not"
Let’s illustrate them with the following examples:
assert !false (1)
assert true && true (2)
assert true || false (3)
1 | "not" false is true |
2 | true "and" true is true |
3 | true "or" false is true |
Precedence
The logical "not" has a higher priority than the logical "and".
assert (!false && false) == false (1)
1 | Here, the assertion is true (as the expression in parentheses is false), because "not" has a higher precedence than "and", so it only applies to the first "false" term; otherwise, it would have applied to the result of the "and", turned it into true, and the assertion would have failed |
The logical "and" has a higher priority than the logical "or".
assert true || true && false (1)
1 | Here, the assertion is true, because "and" has a higher precedence than "or", therefore the "or" is executed last and returns true, having one true argument; otherwise, the "and" would have executed last and returned false, having one false argument, and the assertion would have failed |
Short-circuiting
The logical ||
operator supports short-circuiting: if the left operand is true, it knows that the result will be true in any case, so it won’t evaluate the right operand.
The right operand will be evaluated only if the left operand is false.
Likewise for the logical &&
operator: if the left operand is false, it knows that the result will be false in any case, so it won’t evaluate the right operand.
The right operand will be evaluated only if the left operand is true.
boolean checkIfCalled() { (1)
called = true
}
called = false
true || checkIfCalled()
assert !called (2)
called = false
false || checkIfCalled()
assert called (3)
called = false
false && checkIfCalled()
assert !called (4)
called = false
true && checkIfCalled()
assert called (5)
1 | We create a function that sets the called flag to true whenever it’s called |
2 | In the first case, after resetting the called flag, we confirm that if the left operand to || is true, the function is not called, as || short-circuits the evaluation of the right operand |
3 | In the second case, the left operand is false and so the function is called, as indicated by the fact our flag is now true |
4 | Likewise for && , we confirm that the function is not called with a false left operand |
5 | But the function is called with a true left operand |
1.2.4. Bitwise and bit shift operators
Bitwise operators
Groovy offers four bitwise operators:
-
&
: bitwise "and" -
|
: bitwise "or" -
^
: bitwise "xor" (exclusive "or") -
~
: bitwise negation
Bitwise operators can be applied on arguments which are of type byte
, short
, int
, long
, or BigInteger
.
If one of the arguments is a BigInteger
, the result will be of type BigInteger
;
otherwise, if one of the arguments is a long
, the result will be of type long
;
otherwise, the result will be of type int
:
int a = 0b00101010
assert a == 42
int b = 0b00001000
assert b == 8
assert (a & a) == a (1)
assert (a & b) == b (2)
assert (a | a) == a (3)
assert (a | b) == a (4)
int mask = 0b11111111 (5)
assert ((a ^ a) & mask) == 0b00000000 (6)
assert ((a ^ b) & mask) == 0b00100010 (7)
assert ((~a) & mask) == 0b11010101 (8)
1 | bitwise and |
2 | bitwise and returns common bits |
3 | bitwise or |
4 | bitwise or returns all '1' bits |
5 | setting a mask to check only the last 8 bits |
6 | bitwise exclusive or on self returns 0 |
7 | bitwise exclusive or |
8 | bitwise negation |
It’s worth noting that the internal representation of primitive types follow the Java Language Specification. In particular, primitive types are signed, meaning that for a bitwise negation, it is always good to use a mask to retrieve only the necessary bits.
In Groovy, bitwise operators are overloadable, meaning that you can define the behavior of those operators for any kind of object.
Bit shift operators
Groovy offers three bit shift operators:
-
<<
: left shift -
>>
: right shift -
>>>
: right shift unsigned
All three operators are applicable where the left argument is of type byte
, short
, int
, or long
.
The first two operators can also be applied where the left argument is of type BigInteger
.
If the left argument is a BigInteger
, the result will be of type BigInteger
;
otherwise, if the left argument is a long
, the result will be of type long
;
otherwise, the result will be of type int
:
assert 12.equals(3 << 2) (1)
assert 24L.equals(3L << 3) (1)
assert 48G.equals(3G << 4) (1)
assert 4095 == -200 >>> 20
assert -1 == -200 >> 20
assert 2G == 5G >> 1
assert -3G == -5G >> 1
1 | equals method used instead of == to confirm result type |
In Groovy, bit shift operators are overloadable, meaning that you can define the behavior of those operators for any kind of object.
1.2.5. Conditional operators
Not operator
The "not" operator is represented with an exclamation mark (!
) and inverts the result of the underlying boolean expression. In
particular, it is possible to combine the not
operator with the Groovy truth:
assert (!true) == false (1)
assert (!'foo') == false (2)
assert (!'') == true (3)
1 | the negation of true is false |
2 | 'foo' is a non empty string, evaluating to true , so negation returns false |
3 | '' is an empty string, evaluating to false , so negation returns true |
Ternary operator
The ternary operator is a shortcut expression that is equivalent to an if/else branch assigning some value to a variable.
Instead of:
if (string!=null && string.length()>0) {
result = 'Found'
} else {
result = 'Not found'
}
You can write:
result = (string!=null && string.length()>0) ? 'Found' : 'Not found'
The ternary operator is also compatible with the Groovy truth, so you can make it even simpler:
result = string ? 'Found' : 'Not found'
Elvis operator
The "Elvis operator" is a shortening of the ternary operator. One instance of where this is handy is for returning
a 'sensible default' value if an expression resolves to false
-ish (as in
Groovy truth). A simple example might look like this:
displayName = user.name ? user.name : 'Anonymous' (1)
displayName = user.name ?: 'Anonymous' (2)
1 | with the ternary operator, you have to repeat the value you want to assign |
2 | with the Elvis operator, the value, which is tested, is used if it is not false -ish |
Usage of the Elvis operator reduces the verbosity of your code and reduces the risks of errors in case of refactorings, by removing the need to duplicate the expression which is tested in both the condition and the positive return value.
Elvis assignment operator
Groovy 3.0.0 introduces the Elvis operator, for example:
import groovy.transform.ToString
@ToString
class Element {
String name
int atomicNumber
}
def he = new Element(name: 'Helium')
he.with {
name = name ?: 'Hydrogen' // existing Elvis operator
atomicNumber ?= 2 // new Elvis assignment shorthand
}
assert he.toString() == 'Element(Helium, 2)'
1.2.6. Object operators
Safe navigation operator
The Safe Navigation operator is used to avoid a NullPointerException
. Typically when you have a reference to an object
you might need to verify that it is not null
before accessing methods or properties of the object. To avoid this, the safe
navigation operator will simply return null
instead of throwing an exception, like so:
def person = Person.find { it.id == 123 } (1)
def name = person?.name (2)
assert name == null (3)
1 | find will return a null instance |
2 | use of the null-safe operator prevents from a NullPointerException |
3 | result is null |
Direct field access operator
Normally in Groovy, when you write code like this:
class User {
public final String name (1)
User(String name) { this.name = name}
String getName() { "Name: $name" } (2)
}
def user = new User('Bob')
assert user.name == 'Name: Bob' (3)
1 | public field name |
2 | a getter for name that returns a custom string |
3 | calls the getter |
The user.name
call triggers a call to the property of the same name, that is to say, here, to the getter for name
. If
you want to retrieve the field instead of calling the getter, you can use the direct field access operator:
assert user.@name == 'Bob' (1)
1 | use of .@ forces usage of the field instead of the getter |
Method pointer operator
The method pointer operator (.&
) can be used to store a reference to a method in a variable,
in order to call it later:
def str = 'example of method reference' (1)
def fun = str.&toUpperCase (2)
def upper = fun() (3)
assert upper == str.toUpperCase() (4)
1 | the str variable contains a String |
2 | we store a reference to the toUpperCase method on the str instance inside a variable named fun |
3 | fun can be called like a regular method |
4 | we can check that the result is the same as if we had called it directly on str |
There are multiple advantages in using method pointers. First of all, the type of such a method pointer is
a groovy.lang.Closure
, so it can be used in any place a closure would be used. In particular, it is suitable to
convert an existing method for the needs of the strategy pattern:
def transform(List elements, Closure action) { (1)
def result = []
elements.each {
result << action(it)
}
result
}
String describe(Person p) { (2)
"$p.name is $p.age"
}
def action = this.&describe (3)
def list = [
new Person(name: 'Bob', age: 42),
new Person(name: 'Julia', age: 35)] (4)
assert transform(list, action) == ['Bob is 42', 'Julia is 35'] (5)
1 | the transform method takes each element of the list and calls the action closure on them, returning a new list |
2 | we define a function that takes a Person and returns a String |
3 | we create a method pointer on that function |
4 | we create the list of elements we want to collect the descriptors |
5 | the method pointer can be used where a Closure was expected |
Method pointers are bound by the receiver and a method name. Arguments are resolved at runtime, meaning that if you have multiple methods with the same name, the syntax is not different, only resolution of the appropriate method to be called will be done at runtime:
def doSomething(String str) { str.toUpperCase() } (1)
def doSomething(Integer x) { 2*x } (2)
def reference = this.&doSomething (3)
assert reference('foo') == 'FOO' (4)
assert reference(123) == 246 (5)
1 | define an overloaded doSomething method accepting a String as an argument |
2 | define an overloaded doSomething method accepting an Integer as an argument |
3 | create a single method pointer on doSomething , without specifying argument types |
4 | using the method pointer with a String calls the String version of doSomething |
5 | using the method pointer with an Integer calls the Integer version of doSomething |
To align with Java 8 method reference expectations, in Groovy 3 and above, you can use new
as the
method name to obtain a method pointer to the constructor:
def foo = BigInteger.&new
def fortyTwo = foo('42')
assert fortyTwo == 42G
Also in Groovy 3 and above, you can obtain a method pointer to an instance method of a class. This method pointer takes an additional parameter being the receiver instance to invoke the method on:
def instanceMethod = String.&toUpperCase
assert instanceMethod('foo') == 'FOO'
For backwards compatibility, any static methods that happen to have the correct parameters for the call will be given precedence over instance methods for this case.
Method reference operator
The Parrot parser in Groovy 3+ supports the Java 8+ method reference operator.
The method reference operator (::
) can be used to reference a method or constructor
in contexts expecting a functional interface. This overlaps somewhat with the functionality
provided by Groovy’s method pointer operator. Indeed, for dynamic Groovy, the method
reference operator is just an alias for the method pointer operator.
For static Groovy, the operator results in bytecode similar to the bytecode
that Java would produce for the same context.
Some examples highlighting various supported method reference cases are shown in the following script:
import groovy.transform.CompileStatic
import static java.util.stream.Collectors.toList
@CompileStatic
void methodRefs() {
assert 6G == [1G, 2G, 3G].stream().reduce(0G, BigInteger::add) (1)
assert [4G, 5G, 6G] == [1G, 2G, 3G].stream().map(3G::add).collect(toList()) (2)
assert [1G, 2G, 3G] == [1L, 2L, 3L].stream().map(BigInteger::valueOf).collect(toList()) (3)
assert [1G, 2G, 3G] == [1L, 2L, 3L].stream().map(3G::valueOf).collect(toList()) (4)
}
methodRefs()
1 | class instance method reference: add(BigInteger val) is an instance method in BigInteger |
2 | object instance method reference: add(BigInteger val) is an instance method for object 3G |
3 | class static method reference: valueOf(long val) is a static method for class BigInteger |
4 | object static method reference: valueOf(long val) is a static method for object 3G (some consider this bad style in normal circumstances) |
Some examples highlighting various supported constructor reference cases are shown in the following script:
@CompileStatic
void constructorRefs() {
assert [1, 2, 3] == ['1', '2', '3'].stream().map(Integer::new).collect(toList()) (1)
def result = [1, 2, 3].stream().toArray(Integer[]::new) (2)
assert result instanceof Integer[]
assert result.toString() == '[1, 2, 3]'
}
constructorRefs()
1 | class constructor reference |
2 | array constructor reference |
1.2.7. Regular expression operators
Pattern operator
The pattern operator (~
) provides a simple way to create a java.util.regex.Pattern
instance:
def p = ~/foo/
assert p instanceof Pattern
while in general, you find the pattern operator with an expression in a slashy-string, it can be used with any kind of
String
in Groovy:
p = ~'foo' (1)
p = ~"foo" (2)
p = ~$/dollar/slashy $ string/$ (3)
p = ~"${pattern}" (4)
1 | using single quote strings |
2 | using double quotes strings |
3 | the dollar-slashy string lets you use slashes and the dollar sign without having to escape them |
4 | you can also use a GString! |
Find operator
Alternatively to building a pattern, you can use the find operator =~
to directly create a java.util.regex.Matcher
instance:
def text = "some text to match"
def m = text =~ /match/ (1)
assert m instanceof Matcher (2)
if (!m) { (3)
throw new RuntimeException("Oops, text not found!")
}
1 | =~ creates a matcher against the text variable, using the pattern on the right hand side |
2 | the return type of =~ is a Matcher |
3 | equivalent to calling if (!m.find(0)) |
Since a Matcher
coerces to a boolean
by calling its find
method, the =~
operator is consistent with the simple
use of Perl’s =~
operator, when it appears as a predicate (in if
, ?:
, etc.). When the intent is to iterate over
matches of the specified pattern (in while
, etc.) call find()
directly on the matcher or use the iterator
DGM.
Match operator
The match operator (==~
) is a slight variation of the find operator, that does not return a Matcher
but a boolean
and requires a strict match of the input string:
m = text ==~ /match/ (1)
assert m instanceof Boolean (2)
if (m) { (3)
throw new RuntimeException("Should not reach that point!")
}
1 | ==~ matches the subject with the regular expression, but match must be strict |
2 | the return type of ==~ is therefore a boolean |
3 | equivalent to calling if (text ==~ /match/) |
1.2.8. Other operators
Spread operator
The Spread-dot Operator (*.
), often abbreviated to just Spread Operator, is used to invoke an action on all items
of an aggregate object. It is equivalent to calling the action on each item and collecting the result into a list:
class Car {
String make
String model
}
def cars = [
new Car(make: 'Peugeot', model: '508'),
new Car(make: 'Renault', model: 'Clio')] (1)
def makes = cars*.make (2)
assert makes == ['Peugeot', 'Renault'] (3)
1 | build a list of Car items. The list is an aggregate of objects. |
2 | call the spread operator on the list, accessing the make property of each item |
3 | returns a list of strings corresponding to the collection of make items |
The expression cars*.make
is equivalent to cars.collect{ it.make }
.
Groovy’s GPath notation allows a short-cut when the referenced property
isn’t a property of the containing list, in that case it is automatically
spread. In the previously mentioned case, the expression cars.make
can
be used, though retaining the explicit spread-dot operator is often recommended.
The spread operator is null-safe, meaning that if an element of the collection is null,
it will return null instead of throwing a NullPointerException
:
cars = [
new Car(make: 'Peugeot', model: '508'),
null, (1)
new Car(make: 'Renault', model: 'Clio')]
assert cars*.make == ['Peugeot', null, 'Renault'] (2)
assert null*.make == null (3)
1 | build a list for which one of the elements is null |
2 | using the spread operator will not throw a NullPointerException |
3 | the receiver might also be null, in which case the return value is null |
The spread operator can be used on any class which implements the Iterable
interface:
class Component {
Long id
String name
}
class CompositeObject implements Iterable<Component> {
def components = [
new Component(id: 1, name: 'Foo'),
new Component(id: 2, name: 'Bar')]
@Override
Iterator<Component> iterator() {
components.iterator()
}
}
def composite = new CompositeObject()
assert composite*.id == [1,2]
assert composite*.name == ['Foo','Bar']
Use multiple invocations of the spread-dot operator (here cars*.models*.name
) when
working with aggregates of data structures which themselves contain aggregates:
class Make {
String name
List<Model> models
}
@Canonical
class Model {
String name
}
def cars = [
new Make(name: 'Peugeot',
models: [new Model('408'), new Model('508')]),
new Make(name: 'Renault',
models: [new Model('Clio'), new Model('Captur')])
]
def makes = cars*.name
assert makes == ['Peugeot', 'Renault']
def models = cars*.models*.name
assert models == [['408', '508'], ['Clio', 'Captur']]
assert models.sum() == ['408', '508', 'Clio', 'Captur'] // flatten one level
assert models.flatten() == ['408', '508', 'Clio', 'Captur'] // flatten all levels (one in this case)
Consider using the collectNested
DGM method instead of the spread-dot operator for collections of collections:
class Car {
String make
String model
}
def cars = [
[
new Car(make: 'Peugeot', model: '408'),
new Car(make: 'Peugeot', model: '508')
], [
new Car(make: 'Renault', model: 'Clio'),
new Car(make: 'Renault', model: 'Captur')
]
]
def models = cars.collectNested{ it.model }
assert models == [['408', '508'], ['Clio', 'Captur']]
Spreading method arguments
There may be situations when the arguments of a method call can be found in a list that you need to adapt to the method arguments. In such situations, you can use the spread operator to call the method. For example, imagine you have the following method signature:
int function(int x, int y, int z) {
x*y+z
}
then if you have the following list:
def args = [4,5,6]
you can call the method without having to define intermediate variables:
assert function(*args) == 26
It is even possible to mix normal arguments with spread ones:
args = [4]
assert function(*args,5,6) == 26
Spread list elements
When used inside a list literal, the spread operator acts as if the spread element contents were inlined into the list:
def items = [4,5] (1)
def list = [1,2,3,*items,6] (2)
assert list == [1,2,3,4,5,6] (3)
1 | items is a list |
2 | we want to insert the contents of the items list directly into list without having to call addAll |
3 | the contents of items has been inlined into list |
Spread map elements
The spread map operator works in a similar manner as the spread list operator, but for maps. It allows you to inline the contents of a map into another map literal, like in the following example:
def m1 = [c:3, d:4] (1)
def map = [a:1, b:2, *:m1] (2)
assert map == [a:1, b:2, c:3, d:4] (3)
1 | m1 is the map that we want to inline |
2 | we use the *:m1 notation to spread the contents of m1 into map |
3 | map contains all the elements of m1 |
The position of the spread map operator is relevant, like illustrated in the following example:
def m1 = [c:3, d:4] (1)
def map = [a:1, b:2, *:m1, d: 8] (2)
assert map == [a:1, b:2, c:3, d:8] (3)
1 | m1 is the map that we want to inline |
2 | we use the *:m1 notation to spread the contents of m1 into map , but redefine the key d after spreading |
3 | map contains all the expected keys, but d was redefined |
Range operator
Groovy supports the concept of ranges and provides a notation (..
) to create ranges of objects:
def range = 0..5 (1)
assert (0..5).collect() == [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5] (2)
assert (0..<5).collect() == [0, 1, 2, 3, 4] (3)
assert (0..5) instanceof List (4)
assert (0..5).size() == 6 (5)
1 | a simple range of integers, stored into a local variable |
2 | an IntRange , with inclusive bounds |
3 | an IntRange , with exclusive upper bound |
4 | a groovy.lang.Range implements the List interface |
5 | meaning that you can call the size method on it |
Ranges implementation is lightweight, meaning that only the lower and upper bounds are stored. You can create a range
from any Comparable
object that has next()
and previous()
methods to determine the next / previous item in the range.
For example, you can create a range of characters this way:
assert ('a'..'d').collect() == ['a','b','c','d']
Spaceship operator
The spaceship operator (<=>
) delegates to the compareTo
method:
assert (1 <=> 1) == 0
assert (1 <=> 2) == -1
assert (2 <=> 1) == 1
assert ('a' <=> 'z') == -1
Subscript operator
The subscript operator is a short hand notation for getAt
or putAt
, depending on whether you find it on
the left hand side or the right hand side of an assignment:
def list = [0,1,2,3,4]
assert list[2] == 2 (1)
list[2] = 4 (2)
assert list[0..2] == [0,1,4] (3)
list[0..2] = [6,6,6] (4)
assert list == [6,6,6,3,4] (5)
1 | [2] can be used instead of getAt(2) |
2 | if on left hand side of an assignment, will call putAt |
3 | getAt also supports ranges |
4 | so does putAt |
5 | the list is mutated |
The subscript operator, in combination with a custom implementation of getAt
/putAt
is a convenient way for destructuring
objects:
class User {
Long id
String name
def getAt(int i) { (1)
switch (i) {
case 0: return id
case 1: return name
}
throw new IllegalArgumentException("No such element $i")
}
void putAt(int i, def value) { (2)
switch (i) {
case 0: id = value; return
case 1: name = value; return
}
throw new IllegalArgumentException("No such element $i")
}
}
def user = new User(id: 1, name: 'Alex') (3)
assert user[0] == 1 (4)
assert user[1] == 'Alex' (5)
user[1] = 'Bob' (6)
assert user.name == 'Bob' (7)
1 | the User class defines a custom getAt implementation |
2 | the User class defines a custom putAt implementation |
3 | create a sample user |
4 | using the subscript operator with index 0 allows retrieving the user id |
5 | using the subscript operator with index 1 allows retrieving the user name |
6 | we can use the subscript operator to write to a property thanks to the delegation to putAt |
7 | and check that it’s really the property name which was changed |
Safe index operator
Groovy 3.0.0 introduces safe indexing operator, i.e. ?[]
, which is similar to ?.
. For example:
String[] array = ['a', 'b']
assert 'b' == array?[1] // get using normal array index
array?[1] = 'c' // set using normal array index
assert 'c' == array?[1]
array = null
assert null == array?[1] // return null for all index values
array?[1] = 'c' // quietly ignore attempt to set value
assert null == array?[1]
def personInfo = [name: 'Daniel.Sun', location: 'Shanghai']
assert 'Daniel.Sun' == personInfo?['name'] // get using normal map index
personInfo?['name'] = 'sunlan' // set using normal map index
assert 'sunlan' == personInfo?['name']
personInfo = null
assert null == personInfo?['name'] // return null for all map values
personInfo?['name'] = 'sunlan' // quietly ignore attempt to set value
assert null == personInfo?['name']
Membership operator
The membership operator (in
) is equivalent to calling the isCase
method. In the context of a List
, it is equivalent
to calling contains
, like in the following example:
def list = ['Grace','Rob','Emmy']
assert ('Emmy' in list) (1)
1 | equivalent to calling list.contains('Emmy') or list.isCase('Emmy') |
Identity operator
In Groovy, using ==
to test equality is different from using the same operator in Java. In Groovy, it is calling equals
.
If you want to compare reference equality, you should use is
like in the following example:
def list1 = ['Groovy 1.8','Groovy 2.0','Groovy 2.3'] (1)
def list2 = ['Groovy 1.8','Groovy 2.0','Groovy 2.3'] (2)
assert list1 == list2 (3)
assert !list1.is(list2) (4)
1 | Create a list of strings |
2 | Create another list of strings containing the same elements |
3 | using == , we test object equality |
4 | but using is , we can check that references are distinct |
Coercion operator
The coercion operator (as
) is a variant of casting. Coercion converts object from one type to another without them
being compatible for assignment. Let’s take an example:
Integer x = 123
String s = (String) x (1)
1 | Integer is not assignable to a String , so it will produce a ClassCastException at runtime |
This can be fixed by using coercion instead:
Integer x = 123
String s = x as String (1)
1 | Integer is not assignable to a String , but use of as will coerce it to a String |
When an object is coerced into another, unless the target type is the same as the source type, coercion will return a
new object. The rules of coercion differ depending on the source and target types, and coercion may fail if no conversion
rules are found. Custom conversion rules may be implemented thanks to the asType
method:
class Identifiable {
String name
}
class User {
Long id
String name
def asType(Class target) { (1)
if (target == Identifiable) {
return new Identifiable(name: name)
}
throw new ClassCastException("User cannot be coerced into $target")
}
}
def u = new User(name: 'Xavier') (2)
def p = u as Identifiable (3)
assert p instanceof Identifiable (4)
assert !(p instanceof User) (5)
1 | the User class defines a custom conversion rule from User to Identifiable |
2 | we create an instance of User |
3 | we coerce the User instance into an Identifiable |
4 | the target is an instance of Identifiable |
5 | the target is not an instance of User anymore |
Diamond operator
The diamond operator (<>
) is a syntactic sugar only operator added to support compatibility with the operator of the
same name in Java 7. It is used to indicate that generic types should be inferred from the declaration:
List<String> strings = new LinkedList<>()
In dynamic Groovy, this is totally unused. In statically type checked Groovy, it is also optional since the Groovy type checker performs type inference whether this operator is present or not.
Call operator
The call operator ()
is used to call a method named call
implicitly. For any object which defines a call
method,
you can omit the .call
part and use the call operator instead:
class MyCallable {
int call(int x) { (1)
2*x
}
}
def mc = new MyCallable()
assert mc.call(2) == 4 (2)
assert mc(2) == 4 (3)
1 | MyCallable defines a method named call . Note that it doesn’t need to implement java.util.concurrent.Callable |
2 | we can call the method using the classic method call syntax |
3 | or we can omit .call thanks to the call operator |
1.2.9. Operator precedence
The table below lists all groovy operators in order of precedence.
Level | Operator(s) | Name(s) |
---|---|---|
1 |
|
object creation, explicit parentheses |
|
method call, closure, literal list/map |
|
|
member access, method closure, field/attribute access |
|
|
safe dereferencing, spread, spread-dot, spread-map |
|
|
bitwise negate/pattern, not, typecast |
|
|
list/map/array (safe) index, post inc/decrement |
|
2 |
|
power |
3 |
|
pre inc/decrement, unary plus, unary minus |
4 |
|
multiply, div, remainder |
5 |
|
addition, subtraction |
6 |
|
left/right (unsigned) shift, inclusive/exclusive range |
7 |
|
less/greater than/or equal, in, not in, instanceof, not instanceof, type coercion |
8 |
|
equals, not equals, compare to, identical to, not identical to |
|
regex find, regex match |
|
9 |
|
binary/bitwise and |
10 |
|
binary/bitwise xor |
11 |
|
binary/bitwise or |
12 |
|
logical and |
13 |
|
logical or |
14 |
|
ternary conditional |
|
elvis operator |
|
15 |
|
various assignments |
1.2.10. Operator overloading
Groovy allows you to overload the various operators so that they can be used with your own classes. Consider this simple class:
class Bucket {
int size
Bucket(int size) { this.size = size }
Bucket plus(Bucket other) { (1)
return new Bucket(this.size + other.size)
}
}
1 | Bucket implements a special method called plus() |
Just by implementing the plus()
method, the Bucket
class can now be used with the +
operator like so:
def b1 = new Bucket(4)
def b2 = new Bucket(11)
assert (b1 + b2).size == 15 (1)
1 | The two Bucket objects can be added together with the + operator |
All (non-comparator) Groovy operators have a corresponding method that you can implement in your own classes. The only requirements are that your method is public, has the correct name, and has the correct number of arguments. The argument types depend on what types you want to support on the right hand side of the operator. For example, you could support the statement
assert (b1 + 11).size == 15
by implementing the plus()
method with this signature:
Bucket plus(int capacity) {
return new Bucket(this.size + capacity)
}
Here is a complete list of the operators and their corresponding methods:
Operator | Method | Operator | Method |
---|---|---|---|
|
a.plus(b) |
|
a.getAt(b) |
|
a.minus(b) |
|
a.putAt(b, c) |
|
a.multiply(b) |
|
b.isCase(a) |
|
a.div(b) |
|
a.leftShift(b) |
|
a.mod(b) |
|
a.rightShift(b) |
|
a.power(b) |
|
a.rightShiftUnsigned(b) |
|
a.or(b) |
|
a.next() |
|
a.and(b) |
|
a.previous() |
|
a.xor(b) |
|
a.positive() |
|
a.asType(b) |
|
a.negative() |
|
a.call() |
|
a.bitwiseNegate() |
1.3. Program structure
This chapter covers the program structure of the Groovy programming language.
1.3.1. Package names
Package names play exactly the same role as in Java. They allows us to separate the code base without any conflicts. Groovy classes must specify their package before the class definition, else the default package is assumed.
Defining a package is very similar to Java:
// defining a package named com.yoursite
package com.yoursite
To refer to some class Foo
in the com.yoursite.com
package you will need to use the fully qualified name com.yoursite.com.Foo
, or else you can use an import
statement as we’ll see below.
1.3.2. Imports
In order to refer to any class you need a qualified reference to its package. Groovy follows Java’s notion of allowing import
statement to resolve class references.
For example, Groovy provides several builder classes, such as MarkupBuilder
. MarkupBuilder
is inside the package groovy.xml
so in order to use this class, you need to import
it as shown:
// importing the class MarkupBuilder
import groovy.xml.MarkupBuilder
// using the imported class to create an object
def xml = new MarkupBuilder()
assert xml != null
Default imports
Default imports are the imports that Groovy language provides by default. For example look at the following code:
new Date()
The same code in Java needs an import statement to Date
class like this: import java.util.Date. Groovy by default imports these classes for you.
The below imports are added by groovy for you:
import java.lang.*
import java.util.*
import java.io.*
import java.net.*
import groovy.lang.*
import groovy.util.*
import java.math.BigInteger
import java.math.BigDecimal
This is done because the classes from these packages are most commonly used. By importing these boilerplate code is reduced.
Simple import
A simple import is an import statement where you fully define the class name along with the package. For example the import statement import groovy.xml.MarkupBuilder in the code below is a simple import which directly refers to a class inside a package.
// importing the class MarkupBuilder
import groovy.xml.MarkupBuilder
// using the imported class to create an object
def xml = new MarkupBuilder()
assert xml != null
Star import
Groovy, like Java, provides a special way to import all classes from a package using *
, the so called star import. MarkupBuilder
is a class which is in package groovy.xml
, alongside another class called StreamingMarkupBuilder
. In case you need to use both classes, you can do:
import groovy.xml.MarkupBuilder
import groovy.xml.StreamingMarkupBuilder
def markupBuilder = new MarkupBuilder()
assert markupBuilder != null
assert new StreamingMarkupBuilder() != null
That’s perfectly valid code. But with a *
import, we can achieve the same effect with just one line. The star imports all the classes under package groovy.xml
:
import groovy.xml.*
def markupBuilder = new MarkupBuilder()
assert markupBuilder != null
assert new StreamingMarkupBuilder() != null
One problem with *
imports is that they can clutter your local namespace. But with the kinds of aliasing provided by Groovy, this can be solved easily.
Static import
Groovy’s static import capability allows you to reference imported classes as if they were static methods in your own class:
import static Boolean.FALSE
assert !FALSE //use directly, without Boolean prefix!
This is similar to Java’s static import capability but is a more dynamic than Java in that it allows you to define methods with the same name as an imported method as long as you have different types:
import static java.lang.String.format (1)
class SomeClass {
String format(Integer i) { (2)
i.toString()
}
static void main(String[] args) {
assert format('String') == 'String' (3)
assert new SomeClass().format(Integer.valueOf(1)) == '1'
}
}
1 | static import of method |
2 | declaration of method with same name as method statically imported above, but with a different parameter type |
3 | compile error in java, but is valid groovy code |
If you have the same types, the imported class takes precedence.
Static import aliasing
Static imports with the as
keyword provide an elegant solution to namespace problems. Suppose you want to get a Calendar
instance, using its getInstance()
method. It’s a static method, so we can use a static import. But instead of calling getInstance()
every time, which can be misleading when separated from its class name, we can import it with an alias, to increase code readability:
import static Calendar.getInstance as now
assert now().class == Calendar.getInstance().class
Now, that’s clean!
Static star import
A static star import is very similar to the regular star import. It will import all the static methods from the given class.
For example, lets say we need to calculate sines and cosines for our application.
The class java.lang.Math
has static methods named sin
and cos
which fit our need. With the help of a static star import, we can do:
import static java.lang.Math.*
assert sin(0) == 0.0
assert cos(0) == 1.0
As you can see, we were able to access the methods sin
and cos
directly, without the Math.
prefix.
Import aliasing
With type aliasing, we can refer to a fully qualified class name using a name of our choice. This can be done with the as
keyword, as before.
For example we can import java.sql.Date
as SQLDate
and use it in the same file as java.util.Date
without having to use the fully qualified name of either class:
import java.util.Date
import java.sql.Date as SQLDate
Date utilDate = new Date(1000L)
SQLDate sqlDate = new SQLDate(1000L)
assert utilDate instanceof java.util.Date
assert sqlDate instanceof java.sql.Date
1.3.3. Scripts versus classes
public static void main vs script
Groovy supports both scripts and classes. Take the following code for example:
class Main { (1)
static void main(String... args) { (2)
println 'Groovy world!' (3)
}
}
1 | define a Main class, the name is arbitrary |
2 | the public static void main(String[]) method is usable as the main method of the class |
3 | the main body of the method |
This is typical code that you would find coming from Java, where code has to be embedded into a class to be executable. Groovy makes it easier, the following code is equivalent:
println 'Groovy world!'
A script can be considered as a class without needing to declare it, with some differences.
Script class
A script is always compiled into a class. The Groovy compiler will compile the class for you,
with the body of the script copied into a run
method. The previous example is therefore compiled as if it was the
following:
import org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.InvokerHelper
class Main extends Script { (1)
def run() { (2)
println 'Groovy world!' (3)
}
static void main(String[] args) { (4)
InvokerHelper.runScript(Main, args) (5)
}
}
1 | The Main class extends the groovy.lang.Script class |
2 | groovy.lang.Script requires a run method returning a value |
3 | the script body goes into the run method |
4 | the main method is automatically generated |
5 | and delegates the execution of the script on the run method |
If the script is in a file, then the base name of the file is used to determine the name of the generated script class.
In this example, if the name of the file is Main.groovy
, then the script class is going to be Main
.
Methods
It is possible to define methods into a script, as illustrated here:
int fib(int n) {
n < 2 ? 1 : fib(n-1) + fib(n-2)
}
assert fib(10)==89
You can also mix methods and code. The generated script class will carry all methods into the script class, and
assemble all script bodies into the run
method:
println 'Hello' (1)
int power(int n) { 2**n } (2)
println "2^6==${power(6)}" (3)
1 | script begins |
2 | a method is defined within the script body |
3 | and script continues |
This code is internally converted into:
import org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.InvokerHelper
class Main extends Script {
int power(int n) { 2** n} (1)
def run() {
println 'Hello' (2)
println "2^6==${power(6)}" (3)
}
static void main(String[] args) {
InvokerHelper.runScript(Main, args)
}
}
1 | the power method is copied as is into the generated script class |
2 | first statement is copied into the run method |
3 | second statement is copied into the run method |
Even if Groovy creates a class from your script, it is totally transparent for the user. In particular, scripts are compiled to bytecode, and line numbers are preserved. This implies that if an exception is thrown in a script, the stack trace will show line numbers corresponding to the original script, not the generated code that we have shown. |
Variables
Variables in a script do not require a type definition. This means that this script:
int x = 1
int y = 2
assert x+y == 3
will behave the same as:
x = 1
y = 2
assert x+y == 3
However, there is a semantic difference between the two:
-
if the variable is declared as in the first example, it is a local variable. It will be declared in the
run
method that the compiler will generate and will not be visible outside of the script main body. In particular, such a variable will not be visible in other methods of the script -
if the variable is undeclared, it goes into the script binding. The binding is visible from the methods, and is especially important if you use a script to interact with an application and need to share data between the script and the application. Readers might refer to the integration guide for more information.
Another approach to making a variable visible to all methods, is to use the
@Field annotation.
A variable annotated this way will become a field of the generated script class and,
as for local variables, access won’t involve the script Binding .
While not recommended, if you have a local variable or script field with the same name as a binding variable,
you can use binding.varName to access the binding variable.
|
1.4. Object orientation
This chapter covers the object orientation of the Groovy programming language.
1.4.1. Types
Primitive types
Groovy supports the same primitive types as those defined by the Java Language Specification:
-
integral types:
byte
(8 bit),short
(16 bit),int
(32 bit) andlong
(64 bit) -
floating-point types:
float
(32 bit) anddouble
(64 bit) -
boolean
type (exactlytrue
orfalse
) -
char
type (16 bit, usable as a numeric type, representing an UTF-16 code)
While Groovy declares and stores primitive fields and variables as primitives, because it uses Objects for everything, it autowraps references to primitives. Just like Java, the wrappers it uses are
Primitive type | Wrapper class |
---|---|
boolean |
Boolean |
char |
Character |
short |
Short |
int |
Integer |
long |
Long |
float |
Float |
double |
Double |
Here’s an example using int
class Foo {
static int i
}
assert Foo.class.getDeclaredField('i').type == int.class
assert Foo.i.class != int.class && Foo.i.class == Integer.class
Now you may be concerned that this means every time you use a mathematical operator on a reference to a primitive that you’ll incur the cost of unboxing and reboxing the primitive. But this is not the case, as Groovy will compile your operators into their method equivalents and uses those instead. Additionally, Groovy will automatically unbox to a primitive when calling a Java method that takes a primitive parameter and automatically box primitive method return values from Java. However, be aware there are some differences from Java’s method resolution.
Class
Groovy classes are very similar to Java classes, and are compatible with Java ones at JVM level. They may have methods, fields and properties (think JavaBeans properties but with less boilerplate). Classes and class members can have the same modifiers (public, protected, private, static, etc) as in Java with some minor differences at the source level which are explained shortly.
The key differences between Groovy classes and their Java counterparts are:
-
Classes or methods with no visibility modifier are automatically public (a special annotation can be used to achieve package private visibility).
-
Fields with no visibility modifier are turned into properties automatically, which results in less verbose code, since explicit getter and setter methods aren’t needed. More on this aspect will be covered in the fields and properties section.
-
Classes do not need to have the same base name as their source file definitions but it is highly recommended in most scenarios (see also the next point about scripts).
-
One source file may contain one or more classes (but if a file contains any code not in a class, it is considered a script). Scripts are just classes with some special conventions and will have the same name as their source file (so don’t include a class definition within a script having the same name as the script source file).
The following code presents an example class.
class Person { (1)
String name (2)
Integer age
def increaseAge(Integer years) { (3)
this.age += years
}
}
1 | class beginning, with the name Person |
2 | string field and property named name |
3 | method definition |
Normal class
Normal classes refer to classes which are top level and concrete. This means they can be instantiated without restrictions from any other classes or scripts. This way, they can only be public (even though the public
keyword may be suppressed). Classes are instantiated by calling their constructors, using the new
keyword, as in the following snippet.
def p = new Person()
Inner class
Inner classes are defined within another classes. The enclosing class can use the inner class as usual. On the other side, a inner class can access members of its enclosing class, even if they are private. Classes other than the enclosing class are not allowed to access inner classes. Here is an example:
class Outer {
private String privateStr
def callInnerMethod() {
new Inner().methodA() (1)
}
class Inner { (2)
def methodA() {
println "${privateStr}." (3)
}
}
}
1 | the inner class is instantiated and its method gets called |
2 | inner class definition, inside its enclosing class |
3 | even being private, a field of the enclosing class is accessed by the inner class |
There are some reasons for using inner classes:
-
They increase encapsulation by hiding the inner class from other classes, which do not need to know about it. This also leads to cleaner packages and workspaces.
-
They provide a good organization, by grouping classes that are used by only one class.
-
They lead to more maintainable codes, since inner classes are near the classes that use them.
In several cases, inner classes are implementation of interfaces whose methods are needed by the outer class. The code below illustrates this with the usage of threads, which are very common.
class Outer2 {
private String privateStr = 'some string'
def startThread() {
new Thread(new Inner2()).start()
}
class Inner2 implements Runnable {
void run() {
println "${privateStr}."
}
}
}
Note that the class Inner2
is defined only to provide an implementation of the method run
to class Outer2
. Anonymous inner classes help to eliminate verbosity in this case.
Since Groovy 3.0.0, Java syntax for non-static inner class instantiation is now supported, for example:
class Computer {
class Cpu {
int coreNumber
Cpu(int coreNumber) {
this.coreNumber = coreNumber
}
}
}
assert 4 == new Computer().new Cpu(4).coreNumber
The last example of inner class can be simplified with an anonymous inner class. The same functionality can be achieved with the following code.
class Outer3 {
private String privateStr = 'some string'
def startThread() {
new Thread(new Runnable() { (1)
void run() {
println "${privateStr}."
}
}).start() (2)
}
}
1 | comparing with the last example of previous section, the new Inner2() was replaced by new Runnable() along with all its implementation |
2 | the method start is invoked normally |
Thus, there was no need to define a new class to be used just once.
Abstract class
Abstract classes represent generic concepts, thus, they cannot be instantiated, being created to be subclassed. Their members include fields/properties and abstract or concrete methods. Abstract methods do not have implementation, and must be implemented by concrete subclasses.
abstract class Abstract { (1)
String name
abstract def abstractMethod() (2)
def concreteMethod() {
println 'concrete'
}
}
1 | abstract classes must be declared with abstract keyword |
2 | abstract methods must also be declared with abstract keyword |
Abstract classes are commonly compared to interfaces. But there are at least two important differences of choosing one or another. First, while abstract classes may contain fields/properties and concrete methods, interfaces may contain only abstract methods (method signatures). Moreover, one class can implement several interfaces, whereas it can extend just one class, abstract or not.
Interface
An interface defines a contract that a class needs to conform to. An interface only defines a list of methods that need to be implemented, but does not define the methods implementation.
interface Greeter { (1)
void greet(String name) (2)
}
1 | an interface needs to be declared using the interface keyword |
2 | an interface only defines method signatures |
Methods of an interface are always public. It is an error to use protected
or private
methods in interfaces:
interface Greeter {
protected void greet(String name) (1)
}
1 | Using protected is a compile-time error |
A class implements an interface if it defines the interface in its implements
list or if any of its superclasses
does:
class SystemGreeter implements Greeter { (1)
void greet(String name) { (2)
println "Hello $name"
}
}
def greeter = new SystemGreeter()
assert greeter instanceof Greeter (3)
1 | The SystemGreeter declares the Greeter interface using the implements keyword |
2 | Then implements the required greet method |
3 | Any instance of SystemGreeter is also an instance of the Greeter interface |
An interface can extend another interface:
interface ExtendedGreeter extends Greeter { (1)
void sayBye(String name)
}
1 | the ExtendedGreeter interface extends the Greeter interface using the extends keyword |
It is worth noting that for a class to be an instance of an interface, it has to be explicit. For example, the following
class defines the greet
method as it is declared in the Greeter
interface, but does not declare Greeter
in its
interfaces:
class DefaultGreeter {
void greet(String name) { println "Hello" }
}
greeter = new DefaultGreeter()
assert !(greeter instanceof Greeter)
In other words, Groovy does not define structural typing. It is however possible to make an instance of an object
implement an interface at runtime, using the as
coercion operator:
greeter = new DefaultGreeter() (1)
coerced = greeter as Greeter (2)
assert coerced instanceof Greeter (3)
1 | create an instance of DefaultGreeter that does not implement the interface |
2 | coerce the instance into a Greeter at runtime |
3 | the coerced instance implements the Greeter interface |
You can see that there are two distinct objects: one is the source object, a DefaultGreeter
instance, which does not
implement the interface. The other is an instance of Greeter
that delegates to the coerced object.
Groovy interfaces do not support default implementation like Java 8 interfaces. If you are looking for something similar (but not equal), traits are close to interfaces, but allow default implementation as well as other important features described in this manual. |
Constructors
Constructors are special methods used to initialize an object with a specific state. As with normal methods, it is possible for a class to declare more than one constructor, so long as each constructor has a unique type signature. If an object doesn’t require any parameters during construction, it may use a no-arg constructor. If no constructors are supplied, an empty no-arg constructor will be provided by the Groovy compiler.
Groovy supports two invocation styles:
-
positional parameters are used in a similar to how you would use Java constructors
-
named parameters allow you to specify parameter names when invoking the constructor.
Positional parameters
To create an object by using positional parameters, the respective class needs to declare one or more constructors. In the case of multiple constructors, each must have a unique type signature. The constructors can also added to the class using the groovy.transform.TupleConstructor annotation.
Typically, once at least one constructor is declared, the class can only be instantiated by having one of its
constructors called. It is worth noting that, in this case, you can’t normally create the class with named parameters.
Groovy does support named parameters so long as the class contains a no-arg constructor or provides a constructor which
takes a Map
argument as the first (and potentially only) argument - see the next section for details.
There are three forms of using a declared constructor. The first one is the normal Java way, with the new
keyword.
The others rely on coercion of lists into the desired types. In this case, it is possible to coerce with the as
keyword and by statically typing the variable.
class PersonConstructor {
String name
Integer age
PersonConstructor(name, age) { (1)
this.name = name
this.age = age
}
}
def person1 = new PersonConstructor('Marie', 1) (2)
def person2 = ['Marie', 2] as PersonConstructor (3)
PersonConstructor person3 = ['Marie', 3] (4)
1 | Constructor declaration |
2 | Constructor invocation, classic Java way |
3 | Constructor usage, using coercion with as keyword |
4 | Constructor usage, using coercion in assignment |
Named parameters
If no (or a no-arg) constructor is declared, it is possible to create objects by passing parameters in the form of a
map (property/value pairs). This can be in handy in cases where one wants to allow several combinations of parameters.
Otherwise, by using traditional positional parameters it would be necessary to declare all possible constructors.
Having a constructor where the first (and perhaps only) argument is a Map
argument is also supported - such a
constructor may also be added using the groovy.transform.MapConstructor annotation.
class PersonWOConstructor { (1)
String name
Integer age
}
def person4 = new PersonWOConstructor() (2)
def person5 = new PersonWOConstructor(name: 'Marie') (3)
def person6 = new PersonWOConstructor(age: 1) (4)
def person7 = new PersonWOConstructor(name: 'Marie', age: 2) (5)
1 | No constructor declared |
2 | No parameters given in the instantiation |
3 | name parameter given in the instantiation |
4 | age parameter given in the instantiation |
5 | name and age parameters given in the instantiation |
It is important to highlight, however, that this approach gives more power to the constructor caller, while imposing an increased responsibility on the caller to get the names and value types correct. Thus, if greater control is desired, declaring constructors using positional parameters might be preferred.
Notes:
-
While the example above supplied no constructor, you can also supply a no-arg constructor or a constructor where the first argument is a
Map
, most typically it’s the only argument. -
When no (or a no-arg) constructor is declared, Groovy replaces the named constructor call by a call to the no-arg constructor followed by calls to the setter for each supplied named property.
-
When the first argument is a Map, Groovy combines all named parameters into a Map (regardless of ordering) and supplies the map as the first parameter. This can be a good approach if your properties are declared as
final
(since they will be set in the constructor rather than after the fact with setters). -
You can support both named and positional construction by supply both positional constructors as well as a no-arg or Map constructor.
-
You can support hybrid construction by having a constructor where the first argument is a Map but there are also additional positional parameters. Use this style with caution.
Methods
Groovy methods are quite similar to other languages. Some peculiarities will be shown in the next subsections.
Method definition
A method is defined with a return type or with the def
keyword, to make the return type untyped. A method can also receive any number of arguments, which may not have their types explicitly declared. Java modifiers can be used normally, and if no visibility modifier is provided, the method is public.
Methods in Groovy always return some value. If no return
statement is provided, the value evaluated in the last line executed will be returned. For instance, note that none of the following methods uses the return
keyword.
def someMethod() { 'method called' } (1)
String anotherMethod() { 'another method called' } (2)
def thirdMethod(param1) { "$param1 passed" } (3)
static String fourthMethod(String param1) { "$param1 passed" } (4)
1 | Method with no return type declared and no parameter |
2 | Method with explicit return type and no parameter |
3 | Method with a parameter with no type defined |
4 | Static method with a String parameter |
Named parameters
Like constructors, normal methods can also be called with named parameters.
To support this notation, a convention is used where the first argument to the method is a Map
.
In the method body, the parameter values can be accessed as in normal maps (map.key
).
If the method has just a single Map argument, all supplied parameters must be named.
def foo(Map args) { "${args.name}: ${args.age}" }
foo(name: 'Marie', age: 1)
Named parameters can be mixed with positional parameters.
The same convention applies, in this case, in addition to the Map
argument as the first argument,
the method in question will have additional positional arguments as needed.
Supplied positional parameters when calling the method must be in order.
The named parameters can be in any position. They are grouped into the map and supplied as
the first parameter automatically.
def foo(Map args, Integer number) { "${args.name}: ${args.age}, and the number is ${number}" }
foo(name: 'Marie', age: 1, 23) (1)
foo(23, name: 'Marie', age: 1) (2)
1 | Method call with additional number argument of Integer type |
2 | Method call with changed order of arguments |
If we don’t have the Map as the first argument, then a Map must be supplied for that argument instead of named parameters.
Failure to do so will lead to groovy.lang.MissingMethodException
:
def foo(Integer number, Map args) { "${args.name}: ${args.age}, and the number is ${number}" }
foo(name: 'Marie', age: 1, 23) (1)
1 | Method call throws groovy.lang.MissingMethodException: No signature of method: foo() is applicable for argument types: (LinkedHashMap, Integer) values: [[name:Marie, age:1], 23] , because the named argument Map parameter is not defined as the first argument |
Above exception can be avoided if we replace named arguments with an explicit Map
argument:
def foo(Integer number, Map args) { "${args.name}: ${args.age}, and the number is ${number}" }
foo(23, [name: 'Marie', age: 1]) (1)
1 | Explicit Map argument in place of named arguments makes invocation valid |
Although Groovy allows you to mix named and positional parameters, it can lead to unnecessary confusion. Mix named and positional arguments with caution. |
Default arguments
Default arguments make parameters optional. If the argument is not supplied, the method assumes a default value.
def foo(String par1, Integer par2 = 1) { [name: par1, age: par2] }
assert foo('Marie').age == 1
Note that no mandatory parameter can be defined after a default parameter is present, only other default parameters.
Varargs
Groovy supports methods with a variable number of arguments. They are defined like this: def foo(p1, …, pn, T… args)
.
Here foo
supports n
arguments by default, but also an unspecified number of further arguments exceeding n
.
def foo(Object... args) { args.length }
assert foo() == 0
assert foo(1) == 1
assert foo(1, 2) == 2
This example defines a method foo
, that can take any number of arguments, including no arguments at all.
args.length
will return the number of arguments given. Groovy allows T[]
as a alternative notation to T…
.
That means any method with an array as last parameter is seen by Groovy as a method that can take a variable number of arguments.
def foo(Object[] args) { args.length }
assert foo() == 0
assert foo(1) == 1
assert foo(1, 2) == 2
If a method with varargs is called with null
as the vararg parameter, then the argument will be null
and not an array of length one with null
as the only element.
def foo(Object... args) { args }
assert foo(null) == null
If a varargs method is called with an array as an argument, then the argument will be that array instead of an array of length one containing the given array as the only element.
def foo(Object... args) { args }
Integer[] ints = [1, 2]
assert foo(ints) == [1, 2]
Another important point are varargs in combination with method overloading. In case of method overloading Groovy will select the most specific method.
For example if a method foo
takes a varargs argument of type T
and another method foo
also takes one argument of type T
, the second method is preferred.
def foo(Object... args) { 1 }
def foo(Object x) { 2 }
assert foo() == 1
assert foo(1) == 2
assert foo(1, 2) == 1
Method selection algorithm
Dynamic Groovy supports multiple dispatch (aka multimethods). When calling a method, the actual method invoked is determined dynamically based on the run-time type of methods arguments. First the method name and number of arguments will be considered (including allowance for varargs), and then the type of each argument. Consider the following method definitions:
def method(Object o1, Object o2) { 'o/o' }
def method(Integer i, String s) { 'i/s' }
def method(String s, Integer i) { 's/i' }
Perhaps as expected, calling method
with String
and Integer
parameters,
invokes our third method definition.
assert method('foo', 42) == 's/i'
Of more interest here is when the types are not known at compile time.
Perhaps the arguments are declared to be of type Object
(a list of such objects in our case).
Java would determine that the method(Object, Object)
variant would be selected in all
cases (unless casts were used) but as can be seen in the following example, Groovy uses the runtime type
and will invoke each of our methods once (and normally, no casting is needed):
List<List<Object>> pairs = [['foo', 1], [2, 'bar'], [3, 4]]
assert pairs.collect { a, b -> method(a, b) } == ['s/i', 'i/s', 'o/o']
For each of the first two of our three method invocations an exact match of argument types was found.
For the third invocation, an exact match of method(Integer, Integer)
wasn’t found but method(Object, Object)
is still valid and will be selected.
Method selection then is about finding the closest fit from valid method candidates which have compatible
parameter types.
So, method(Object, Object)
is also valid for the first two invocations but is not as close a match
as the variants where types exactly match.
To determine the closest fit, the runtime has a notion of the distance an actual argument
type is away from the declared parameter type and tries to minimise the total distance across all parameters.
The following table illustrates some factors which affect the distance calculation.
Aspect | Example |
---|---|
Directly implemented interfaces match more closely than ones from further up the inheritance hierarchy. |
Given these interface and method definitions:
The directly implemented interface will match:
|
An Object array is preferred over an Object. |
|
Non-vararg variants are favored over vararg variants. |
|
If two vararg variants are applicable, the one which uses the minimum number of vararg arguments is preferred. |
|
Interfaces are preferred over super classes. |
|
For a primitive argument type, a declared parameter type which is the same or slightly larger is preferred. |
|
In the case where two variants have exactly the same distance, this is deemed ambiguous and will cause a runtime exception:
def method(Date d, Object o) { 'd/o' }
def method(Object o, String s) { 'o/s' }
def ex = shouldFail {
println method(new Date(), 'baz')
}
assert ex.message.contains('Ambiguous method overloading')
Casting can be used to select the desired method:
assert method(new Date(), (Object)'baz') == 'd/o'
assert method((Object)new Date(), 'baz') == 'o/s'
Exception declaration
Groovy automatically allows you to treat checked exceptions like unchecked exceptions.
This means that you don’t need to declare any checked exceptions that a method may throw
as shown in the following example which can throw a FileNotFoundException
if the file isn’t found:
def badRead() {
new File('doesNotExist.txt').text
}
shouldFail(FileNotFoundException) {
badRead()
}
Nor will you be required to surround the call to the badRead
method in the previous example within a try/catch
block - though you are free to do so if you wish.
If you wish to declare any exceptions that your code might throw (checked or otherwise) you are free to do so. Adding exceptions won’t change how the code is used from any other Groovy code but can be seen as documentation for the human reader of your code. The exceptions will become part of the method declaration in the bytecode, so if your code might be called from Java, it might be useful to include them. Using an explicit checked exception declaration is illustrated in the following example:
def badRead() throws FileNotFoundException {
new File('doesNotExist.txt').text
}
shouldFail(FileNotFoundException) {
badRead()
}
Fields and properties
Fields
A field is a member of a class or a trait which has:
-
a mandatory access modifier (
public
,protected
, orprivate
) -
one or more optional modifiers (
static
,final
,synchronized
) -
an optional type
-
a mandatory name
class Data {
private int id (1)
protected String description (2)
public static final boolean DEBUG = false (3)
}
1 | a private field named id , of type int |
2 | a protected field named description , of type String |
3 | a public static final field named DEBUG of type boolean |
A field may be initialized directly at declaration:
class Data {
private String id = IDGenerator.next() (1)
// ...
}
1 | the private field id is initialized with IDGenerator.next() |
It is possible to omit the type declaration of a field. This is however considered a bad practice and in general it is a good idea to use strong typing for fields:
class BadPractice {
private mapping (1)
}
class GoodPractice {
private Map<String,String> mapping (2)
}
1 | the field mapping doesn’t declare a type |
2 | the field mapping has a strong type |
The difference between the two is important if you want to use optional type checking later. It is also important as a way to document the class design. However, in some cases like scripting or if you want to rely on duck typing it may be useful to omit the type.
Properties
A property is an externally visible feature of a class. Rather than just using a public field to represent such features (which provides a more limited abstraction and would restrict refactoring possibilities), the typical approach in Java is to follow the conventions outlined in the JavaBeans Specification, i.e. represent the property using a combination of a private backing field and getters/setters. Groovy follows these same conventions but provides a simpler way to define the property. You can define a property with:
-
an absent access modifier (no
public
,protected
orprivate
) -
one or more optional modifiers (
static
,final
,synchronized
) -
an optional type
-
a mandatory name
Groovy will then generate the getters/setters appropriately. For example:
class Person {
String name (1)
int age (2)
}
1 | creates a backing private String name field, a getName and a setName method |
2 | creates a backing private int age field, a getAge and a setAge method |
If a property is declared final
, no setter is generated:
class Person {
final String name (1)
final int age (2)
Person(String name, int age) {
this.name = name (3)
this.age = age (4)
}
}
1 | defines a read-only property of type String |
2 | defines a read-only property of type int |
3 | assigns the name parameter to the name field |
4 | assigns the age parameter to the age field |
Properties are accessed by name and will call the getter or setter transparently, unless the code is in the class which defines the property:
class Person {
String name
void name(String name) {
this.name = "Wonder$name" (1)
}
String wonder() {
this.name (2)
}
}
def p = new Person()
p.name = 'Marge' (3)
assert p.name == 'Marge' (4)
p.name('Marge') (5)
assert p.wonder() == 'WonderMarge' (6)
1 | this.name will directly access the field because the property is accessed from within the class that defines it |
2 | similarily a read access is done directly on the name field |
3 | write access to the property is done outside of the Person class so it will implicitly call setName |
4 | read access to the property is done outside of the Person class so it will implicitly call getName |
5 | this will call the name method on Person which performs a direct access to the field |
6 | this will call the wonder method on Person which performs a direct read access to the field |
It is worth noting that this behavior of accessing the backing field directly is done in order to prevent a stack overflow when using the property access syntax within a class that defines the property.
It is possible to list the properties of a class thanks to the meta properties
field of an instance:
class Person {
String name
int age
}
def p = new Person()
assert p.properties.keySet().containsAll(['name','age'])
By convention, Groovy will recognize properties even if there is no backing field provided there are getters or setters that follow the Java Beans specification. For example:
class PseudoProperties {
// a pseudo property "name"
void setName(String name) {}
String getName() {}
// a pseudo read-only property "age"
int getAge() { 42 }
// a pseudo write-only property "groovy"
void setGroovy(boolean groovy) { }
}
def p = new PseudoProperties()
p.name = 'Foo' (1)
assert p.age == 42 (2)
p.groovy = true (3)
1 | writing p.name is allowed because there is a pseudo-property name |
2 | reading p.age is allowed because there is a pseudo-readonly property age |
3 | writing p.groovy is allowed because there is a pseudo-writeonly property groovy |
This syntactic sugar is at the core of many DSLs written in Groovy.
It is generally recommended that the first two letters of a property name are lowercase and for multiword properties
that camel case is used. In those cases, generated getters and setters will have a name formed by capitalizing the
property name and adding a get
or set
prefix (or optionally "is" for a boolean getter).
So, getLength
would be a getter for a length
property and setFirstName
a setter for a firstName
property.
isEmpty
might be the getter method name for a property named empty
.
Property names starting with a capital letter would have getters/setters with just the prefix added.
So, the property |
The JavaBeans specification makes a special case for properties which typically might be acronyms.
If the first two letters of a property name are uppercase, no capitalization is performed
(or more importantly, no decapitalization is done if generating the property name from the accessor method name).
So, getURL
would be the getter for a URL
property.
Because of the special "acronym handling" property naming logic in the JavaBeans specification, the
conversion to and from a property name are non-symmetrical. This leads to some strange edge cases.
Groovy adopts a naming convention that avoids one ambiguity that might seem a little strange but
was popular at the time of Groovy’s design and has remained (so far) for historical reasons.
Groovy looks at the second letter of a property name. If that is a capital, the property is deemed to be
one of the acronym style properties and no capitalization is done, otherwise normal capitalization is done.
Although we never recommend it, it does allow you to have what might seem like "duplicate named" properties,
e.g. you can have |
Annotation
Annotation definition
An annotation is a kind of special interface dedicated at annotating elements of the code. An annotation is a type which
superinterface is the Annotation interface. Annotations are declared in a very
similar way to interfaces, using the @interface
keyword:
@interface SomeAnnotation {}
An annotation may define members in the form of methods without bodies and an optional default value. The possible member types are limited to:
-
primitive types
-
an enumeration
-
another annotation type
-
or any array of the above
For example:
@interface SomeAnnotation {
String value() (1)
}
@interface SomeAnnotation {
String value() default 'something' (2)
}
@interface SomeAnnotation {
int step() (3)
}
@interface SomeAnnotation {
Class appliesTo() (4)
}
@interface SomeAnnotation {}
@interface SomeAnnotations {
SomeAnnotation[] value() (5)
}
enum DayOfWeek { mon, tue, wed, thu, fri, sat, sun }
@interface Scheduled {
DayOfWeek dayOfWeek() (6)
}
1 | an annotation defining a value member of type String |
2 | an annotation defining a value member of type String with a default value of something |
3 | an annotation defining a step member of type the primitive type int |
4 | an annotation defining a appliesTo member of type Class |
5 | an annotation defining a value member which type is an array of another annotation type |
6 | an annotation defining a dayOfWeek member which type is the enumeration type DayOfWeek |
Unlike in the Java language, in Groovy, an annotation can be used to alter the semantics of the language. It is especially true of AST transformations which will generate code based on annotations.
Annotation placement
An annotation can be applied on various elements of the code:
@SomeAnnotation (1)
void someMethod() {
// ...
}
@SomeAnnotation (2)
class SomeClass {}
@SomeAnnotation String var (3)
1 | @SomeAnnotation applies to the someMethod method |
2 | @SomeAnnotation applies to the SomeClass class |
3 | @SomeAnnotation applies to the var variable |
In order to limit the scope where an annotation can be applied, it is necessary to declare it on the annotation definition, using the Target annotation. For example, here is how you would declare that an annotation can be applied to a class or a method:
import java.lang.annotation.ElementType
import java.lang.annotation.Target
@Target([ElementType.METHOD, ElementType.TYPE]) (1)
@interface SomeAnnotation {} (2)
1 | the @Target annotation is meant to annotate an annotation with a scope. |
2 | @SomeAnnotation will therefore only be allowed on TYPE or METHOD |
The list of possible targets is available in the ElementType enumeration.
Groovy does not support the TYPE_PARAMETER and TYPE_USE element types which were introduced in Java 8. |
Annotation member values
When an annotation is used, it is required to set at least all members that do not have a default value. For example:
@interface Page {
int statusCode()
}
@Page(statusCode=404)
void notFound() {
// ...
}
However it is possible to omit value=
in the declaration of the value of an annotation if the member value
is the
only one being set:
@interface Page {
String value()
int statusCode() default 200
}
@Page(value='/home') (1)
void home() {
// ...
}
@Page('/users') (2)
void userList() {
// ...
}
@Page(value='error',statusCode=404) (3)
void notFound() {
// ...
}
1 | we can omit the statusCode because it has a default value, but value needs to be set |
2 | since value is the only mandatory member without a default, we can omit value= |
3 | if both value and statusCode need to be set, it is required to use value= for the default value member |
Retention policy
The visibility of an annotation depends on its retention policy. The retention policy of an annotation is set using the Retention annotation:
import java.lang.annotation.Retention
import java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.SOURCE) (1)
@interface SomeAnnotation {} (2)
1 | the @Retention annotation annotates the @SomeAnnotation annotation |
2 | so @SomeAnnotation will have a SOURCE retention |
The list of possible retention targets and description is available in the RetentionPolicy enumeration. The choice usually depends on whether you want an annotation to be visible at compile time or runtime.
Closure annotation parameters
An interesting feature of annotations in Groovy is that you can use a closure as an annotation value. Therefore annotations may be used with a wide variety of expressions and still have IDE support. For example, imagine a framework where you want to execute some methods based on environmental constraints like the JDK version or the OS. One could write the following code:
class Tasks {
Set result = []
void alwaysExecuted() {
result << 1
}
@OnlyIf({ jdk>=6 })
void supportedOnlyInJDK6() {
result << 'JDK 6'
}
@OnlyIf({ jdk>=7 && windows })
void requiresJDK7AndWindows() {
result << 'JDK 7 Windows'
}
}
For the @OnlyIf
annotation to accept a Closure
as an argument, you only have to declare the value
as a Class
:
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
@interface OnlyIf {
Class value() (1)
}
To complete the example, let’s write a sample runner that would use that information:
class Runner {
static <T> T run(Class<T> taskClass) {
def tasks = taskClass.newInstance() (1)
def params = [jdk:6, windows: false] (2)
tasks.class.declaredMethods.each { m -> (3)
if (Modifier.isPublic(m.modifiers) && m.parameterTypes.length == 0) { (4)
def onlyIf = m.getAnnotation(OnlyIf) (5)
if (onlyIf) {
Closure cl = onlyIf.value().newInstance(tasks,tasks) (6)
cl.delegate = params (7)
if (cl()) { (8)
m.invoke(tasks) (9)
}
} else {
m.invoke(tasks) (10)
}
}
}
tasks (11)
}
}
1 | create a new instance of the class passed as an argument (the task class) |
2 | emulate an environment which is JDK 6 and not Windows |
3 | iterate on all declared methods of the task class |
4 | if the method is public and takes no-argument |
5 | try to find the @OnlyIf annotation |
6 | if it is found get the value and create a new Closure out of it |
7 | set the delegate of the closure to our environment variable |
8 | call the closure, which is the annotation closure. It will return a boolean |
9 | if it is true , call the method |
10 | if the method is not annotated with @OnlyIf , execute the method anyway |
11 | after that, return the task object |
Then the runner can be used this way:
def tasks = Runner.run(Tasks)
assert tasks.result == [1, 'JDK 6'] as Set
Meta-annotations
Meta-annotations, also known as annotation aliases are annotations that are replaced at compile time by other annotations (one meta-annotation is an alias for one or more annotations). Meta-annotations can be used to reduce the size of code involving multiple annotations.
Let’s start with a simple example. Imagine you have the @Service
and @Transactional
annotations and that you want to annotate a class
with both:
@Service
@Transactional
class MyTransactionalService {}
Given the multiplication of annotations that you could add to the same class, a meta-annotation could help by reducing the two annotations with a single one having the very same semantics. For example, we might want to write this instead:
@TransactionalService (1)
class MyTransactionalService {}
1 | @TransactionalService is a meta-annotation |
A meta-annotation is declared as a regular annotation but annotated with @AnnotationCollector
and the
list of annotations it is collecting. In our case, the @TransactionalService
annotation can be written:
import groovy.transform.AnnotationCollector
@Service (1)
@Transactional (2)
@AnnotationCollector (3)
@interface TransactionalService {
}
1 | annotate the meta-annotation with @Service |
2 | annotate the meta-annotation with @Transactional |
3 | annotate the meta-annotation with @AnnotationCollector |
Groovy supports both precompiled and source form meta-annotations. This means that your meta-annotation may be precompiled, or you can have it in the same source tree as the one you are currently compiling.
INFO: Meta-annotations are a Groovy-only feature. There is no chance for you to annotate a Java class with a meta-annotation and hope it will do the same as in Groovy. Likewise, you cannot write a meta-annotation in Java: both the meta-annotation definition and usage have to be Groovy code. But you can happily collect Java annotations and Groovy annotations within your meta-annotation.
When the Groovy compiler encounters a class annotated with a
meta-annotation, it replaces it with the collected annotations. So,
in our previous example, it will
replace @TransactionalService
with @Transactional
and @Service
:
def annotations = MyTransactionalService.annotations*.annotationType()
assert (Service in annotations)
assert (Transactional in annotations)
The conversion from a meta-annotation to the collected annotations is performed during the semantic analysis compilation phase.
In addition to replacing the alias with the collected annotations, a meta-annotation is capable of processing them, including arguments.
Meta-annotations can collect annotations which have parameters. To illustrate this, we will imagine two annotations, each of them accepting one argument:
@Timeout(after=3600)
@Dangerous(type='explosive')
And suppose that you want create a meta-annotation named @Explosive
:
@Timeout(after=3600)
@Dangerous(type='explosive')
@AnnotationCollector
public @interface Explosive {}
By default, when the annotations are replaced, they will get the annotation parameter values as they were defined in the alias. More interesting, the meta-annotation supports overriding specific values:
@Explosive(after=0) (1)
class Bomb {}
1 | the after value provided as a parameter to @Explosive overrides the one defined in the @Timeout annotation |
If two annotations define the same parameter name, the default processor will copy the annotation value to all annotations that accept this parameter:
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
public @interface Foo {
String value() (1)
}
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
public @interface Bar {
String value() (2)
}
@Foo
@Bar
@AnnotationCollector
public @interface FooBar {} (3)
@Foo('a')
@Bar('b')
class Bob {} (4)
assert Bob.getAnnotation(Foo).value() == 'a' (5)
println Bob.getAnnotation(Bar).value() == 'b' (6)
@FooBar('a')
class Joe {} (7)
assert Joe.getAnnotation(Foo).value() == 'a' (8)
println Joe.getAnnotation(Bar).value() == 'a' (9)
1 | the @Foo annotation defines the value member of type String |
2 | the @Bar annotation also defines the value member of type String |
3 | the @FooBar meta-annotation aggregates @Foo and @Bar |
4 | class Bob is annotated with @Foo and @Bar |
5 | the value of the @Foo annotation on Bob is a |
6 | while the value of the @Bar annotation on Bob is b |
7 | class Joe is annotated with @FooBar |
8 | then the value of the @Foo annotation on Joe is a |
9 | and the value of the @Bar annotation on Joe is also a |
In the second case, the meta-annotation value was copied in
both @Foo
and @Bar
annotations.
It is a compile time error if the collected annotations define the same members
with incompatible types. For example if on the previous example @Foo defined a value of
type String but @Bar defined a value of type int .
|
It is however possible to customize the behavior of meta-annotations and describe how collected annotations are expanded. We’ll look at how to do that shortly but first there is an advanced processing option to cover.
The @AnnotationCollector
annotation supports a mode
parameter which can be used to
alter how the default processor handles annotation replacement in the presence of
duplicate annotations.
INFO: Custom processors (discussed next) may or may not support this parameter.
As an example, suppose you create a meta-annotation containing the @ToString
annotation
and then place your meta-annotation on a class that already has an explicit @ToString
annotation. Should this be an error? Should both annotations be applied? Does one take
priority over the other? There is no correct answer. In some scenarios it might be
quite appropriate for any of these answers to be correct. So, rather than trying to
preempt one correct way to handle the duplicate annotation issue, Groovy let’s you
write your own custom meta-annotation processors (covered next) and let’s you write
whatever checking logic you like within AST transforms - which are a frequent target for
aggregating. Having said that, by simply setting the mode
, a number of commonly
expected scenarios are handled automatically for you within any extra coding.
The behavior of the mode
parameter is determined by the AnnotationCollectorMode
enum value chosen and is summarized in the following table.
Mode |
Description |
DUPLICATE |
Annotations from the annotation collection will always be inserted. After all transforms have been run, it will be an error if multiple annotations (excluding those with SOURCE retention) exist. |
PREFER_COLLECTOR |
Annotations from the collector will be added and any existing annotations with the same name will be removed. |
PREFER_COLLECTOR_MERGED |
Annotations from the collector will be added and any existing annotations with the same name will be removed but any new parameters found within existing annotations will be merged into the added annotation. |
PREFER_EXPLICIT |
Annotations from the collector will be ignored if any existing annotations with the same name are found. |
PREFER_EXPLICIT_MERGED |
Annotations from the collector will be ignored if any existing annotations with the same name are found but any new parameters on the collector annotation will be added to existing annotations. |
A custom annotation processor will let you choose how to expand a meta-annotation into collected annotations. The behaviour of the meta-annotation is, in this case, totally up to you. To do this, you must:
-
create a meta-annotation processor, extending AnnotationCollectorTransform
-
declare the processor to be used in the meta-annotation declaration
To illustrate this, we are going to explore how the meta-annotation @CompileDynamic
is implemented.
@CompileDynamic
is a meta-annotation that expands itself
to @CompileStatic(TypeCheckingMode.SKIP)
. The problem is that the
default meta annotation processor doesn’t support enums and the
annotation value TypeCheckingMode.SKIP
is one.
The naive implementation here would not work:
@CompileStatic(TypeCheckingMode.SKIP)
@AnnotationCollector
public @interface CompileDynamic {}
Instead, we will define it like this:
@AnnotationCollector(processor = "org.codehaus.groovy.transform.CompileDynamicProcessor")
public @interface CompileDynamic {
}
The first thing you may notice is that our interface is no longer
annotated with @CompileStatic
. The reason for this is that we rely on
the processor
parameter instead, that references a class which
will generate the annotation.
Here is how the custom processor is implemented:
@CompileStatic (1)
class CompileDynamicProcessor extends AnnotationCollectorTransform { (2)
private static final ClassNode CS_NODE = ClassHelper.make(CompileStatic) (3)
private static final ClassNode TC_NODE = ClassHelper.make(TypeCheckingMode) (4)
List<AnnotationNode> visit(AnnotationNode collector, (5)
AnnotationNode aliasAnnotationUsage, (6)
AnnotatedNode aliasAnnotated, (7)
SourceUnit source) { (8)
def node = new AnnotationNode(CS_NODE) (9)
def enumRef = new PropertyExpression(
new ClassExpression(TC_NODE), "SKIP") (10)
node.addMember("value", enumRef) (11)
Collections.singletonList(node) (12)
}
}
1 | our custom processor is written in Groovy, and for better compilation performance, we use static compilation |
2 | the custom processor has to extend AnnotationCollectorTransform |
3 | create a class node representing the @CompileStatic annotation type |
4 | create a class node representing the TypeCheckingMode enum type |
5 | collector is the @AnnotationCollector node found in the meta-annotation. Usually unused. |
6 | aliasAnnotationUsage is the meta-annotation being expanded, here it is @CompileDynamic |
7 | aliasAnnotated is the node being annotated with the meta-annotation |
8 | sourceUnit is the SourceUnit being compiled |
9 | we create a new annotation node for @CompileStatic |
10 | we create an expression equivalent to TypeCheckingMode.SKIP |
11 | we add that expression to the annotation node, which is now @CompileStatic(TypeCheckingMode.SKIP) |
12 | return the generated annotation |
In the example, the visit
method is the only method which has to be overridden. It is meant to return a list of
annotation nodes that will be added to the node annotated with the meta-annotation. In this example, we return a
single one corresponding to @CompileStatic(TypeCheckingMode.SKIP)
.
1.4.2. Traits
Traits are a structural construct of the language which allows:
-
composition of behaviors
-
runtime implementation of interfaces
-
behavior overriding
-
compatibility with static type checking/compilation
They can be seen as interfaces carrying both default implementations and state. A trait is defined using the
trait
keyword:
trait FlyingAbility { (1)
String fly() { "I'm flying!" } (2)
}
1 | declaration of a trait |
2 | declaration of a method inside a trait |
Then it can be used like a normal interface using the implements
keyword:
class Bird implements FlyingAbility {} (1)
def b = new Bird() (2)
assert b.fly() == "I'm flying!" (3)
1 | Adds the trait FlyingAbility to the Bird class capabilities |
2 | instantiate a new Bird |
3 | the Bird class automatically gets the behavior of the FlyingAbility trait |
Traits allow a wide range of capabilities, from simple composition to testing, which are described thoroughly in this section.
Methods
Public methods
Declaring a method in a trait can be done like any regular method in a class:
trait FlyingAbility { (1)
String fly() { "I'm flying!" } (2)
}
1 | declaration of a trait |
2 | declaration of a method inside a trait |
Abstract methods
In addition, traits may declare abstract methods too, which therefore need to be implemented in the class implementing the trait:
trait Greetable {
abstract String name() (1)
String greeting() { "Hello, ${name()}!" } (2)
}
1 | implementing class will have to declare the name method |
2 | can be mixed with a concrete method |
Then the trait can be used like this:
class Person implements Greetable { (1)
String name() { 'Bob' } (2)
}
def p = new Person()
assert p.greeting() == 'Hello, Bob!' (3)
1 | implement the trait Greetable |
2 | since name was abstract, it is required to implement it |
3 | then greeting can be called |
Private methods
Traits may also define private methods. Those methods will not appear in the trait contract interface:
trait Greeter {
private String greetingMessage() { (1)
'Hello from a private method!'
}
String greet() {
def m = greetingMessage() (2)
println m
m
}
}
class GreetingMachine implements Greeter {} (3)
def g = new GreetingMachine()
assert g.greet() == "Hello from a private method!" (4)
try {
assert g.greetingMessage() (5)
} catch (MissingMethodException e) {
println "greetingMessage is private in trait"
}
1 | define a private method greetingMessage in the trait |
2 | the public greet message calls greetingMessage by default |
3 | create a class implementing the trait |
4 | greet can be called |
5 | but not greetingMessage |
Traits only support public and private methods. Neither protected nor package private scopes are
supported.
|
Final methods
If we have a class implementing a trait, conceptually implementations from the trait methods are "inherited" into the class. But, in reality, there is no base class containing such implementations. Rather, they are woven directly into the class. A final modifier on a method just indicates what the modifier will be for the woven method. While it would likely be considered bad style to inherit and override or multiply inherit methods with the same signature but a mix of final and non-final variants, Groovy doesn’t prohibit this scenario. Normal method selection applies and the modifier used will be determined from the resulting method. You might consider creating a base class which implements the desired trait(s) if you want trait implementation methods that can’t be overridden.
The meaning of this
this
represents the implementing instance. Think of a trait as a superclass. This means that when you write:
trait Introspector {
def whoAmI() { this }
}
class Foo implements Introspector {}
def foo = new Foo()
then calling:
foo.whoAmI()
will return the same instance:
assert foo.whoAmI().is(foo)
Interfaces
Traits may implement interfaces, in which case the interfaces are declared using the implements
keyword:
interface Named { (1)
String name()
}
trait Greetable implements Named { (2)
String greeting() { "Hello, ${name()}!" }
}
class Person implements Greetable { (3)
String name() { 'Bob' } (4)
}
def p = new Person()
assert p.greeting() == 'Hello, Bob!' (5)
assert p instanceof Named (6)
assert p instanceof Greetable (7)
1 | declaration of a normal interface |
2 | add Named to the list of implemented interfaces |
3 | declare a class that implements the Greetable trait |
4 | implement the missing name method |
5 | the greeting implementation comes from the trait |
6 | make sure Person implements the Named interface |
7 | make sure Person implements the Greetable trait |
Properties
A trait may define properties, like in the following example:
trait Named {
String name (1)
}
class Person implements Named {} (2)
def p = new Person(name: 'Bob') (3)
assert p.name == 'Bob' (4)
assert p.getName() == 'Bob' (5)
1 | declare a property name inside a trait |
2 | declare a class which implements the trait |
3 | the property is automatically made visible |
4 | it can be accessed using the regular property accessor |
5 | or using the regular getter syntax |
Fields
Private fields
Since traits allow the use of private methods, it can also be interesting to use private fields to store state. Traits will let you do that:
trait Counter {
private int count = 0 (1)
int count() { count += 1; count } (2)
}
class Foo implements Counter {} (3)
def f = new Foo()
assert f.count() == 1 (4)
assert f.count() == 2
1 | declare a private field count inside a trait |
2 | declare a public method count that increments the counter and returns it |
3 | declare a class that implements the Counter trait |
4 | the count method can use the private field to keep state |
This is a major difference with Java 8 virtual extension methods. While virtual extension methods do not carry state, traits can. Moreover, traits in Groovy are supported starting with Java 6, because their implementation does not rely on virtual extension methods. This means that even if a trait can be seen from a Java class as a regular interface, that interface will not have default methods, only abstract ones. |
Public fields
Public fields work the same way as private fields, but in order to avoid the diamond problem, field names are remapped in the implementing class:
trait Named {
public String name (1)
}
class Person implements Named {} (2)
def p = new Person() (3)
p.Named__name = 'Bob' (4)
1 | declare a public field inside the trait |
2 | declare a class implementing the trait |
3 | create an instance of that class |
4 | the public field is available, but renamed |
The name of the field depends on the fully qualified name of the trait. All dots (.
) in package are replaced with an underscore (_
), and the final name includes a double underscore.
So if the type of the field is String
, the name of the package is my.package
, the name of the trait is Foo
and the name of the field is bar
,
in the implementing class, the public field will appear as:
String my_package_Foo__bar
While traits support public fields, it is not recommended to use them and considered as a bad practice. |
Composition of behaviors
Traits can be used to implement multiple inheritance in a controlled way. For example, we can have the following traits:
trait FlyingAbility { (1)
String fly() { "I'm flying!" } (2)
}
trait SpeakingAbility {
String speak() { "I'm speaking!" }
}
And a class implementing both traits:
class Duck implements FlyingAbility, SpeakingAbility {} (1)
def d = new Duck() (2)
assert d.fly() == "I'm flying!" (3)
assert d.speak() == "I'm speaking!" (4)
1 | the Duck class implements both FlyingAbility and SpeakingAbility |
2 | creates a new instance of Duck |
3 | we can call the method fly from FlyingAbility |
4 | but also the method speak from SpeakingAbility |
Traits encourage the reuse of capabilities among objects, and the creation of new classes by the composition of existing behavior.
Overriding default methods
Traits provide default implementations for methods, but it is possible to override them in the implementing class. For example, we can slightly change the example above, by having a duck which quacks:
class Duck implements FlyingAbility, SpeakingAbility {
String quack() { "Quack!" } (1)
String speak() { quack() } (2)
}
def d = new Duck()
assert d.fly() == "I'm flying!" (3)
assert d.quack() == "Quack!" (4)
assert d.speak() == "Quack!" (5)
1 | define a method specific to Duck , named quack |
2 | override the default implementation of speak so that we use quack instead |
3 | the duck is still flying, from the default implementation |
4 | quack comes from the Duck class |
5 | speak no longer uses the default implementation from SpeakingAbility |
Extending traits
Simple inheritance
Traits may extend another trait, in which case you must use the extends
keyword:
trait Named {
String name (1)
}
trait Polite extends Named { (2)
String introduce() { "Hello, I am $name" } (3)
}
class Person implements Polite {}
def p = new Person(name: 'Alice') (4)
assert p.introduce() == 'Hello, I am Alice' (5)
1 | the Named trait defines a single name property |
2 | the Polite trait extends the Named trait |
3 | Polite adds a new method which has access to the name property of the super-trait |
4 | the name property is visible from the Person class implementing Polite |
5 | as is the introduce method |
Multiple inheritance
Alternatively, a trait may extend multiple traits. In that case, all super traits must be declared in the implements
clause:
trait WithId { (1)
Long id
}
trait WithName { (2)
String name
}
trait Identified implements WithId, WithName {} (3)
1 | WithId trait defines the id property |
2 | WithName trait defines the name property |
3 | Identified is a trait which inherits both WithId and WithName |
Duck typing and traits
Dynamic code
Traits can call any dynamic code, like a normal Groovy class. This means that you can, in the body of a method, call methods which are supposed to exist in an implementing class, without having to explicitly declare them in an interface. This means that traits are fully compatible with duck typing:
trait SpeakingDuck {
String speak() { quack() } (1)
}
class Duck implements SpeakingDuck {
String methodMissing(String name, args) {
"${name.capitalize()}!" (2)
}
}
def d = new Duck()
assert d.speak() == 'Quack!' (3)
1 | the SpeakingDuck expects the quack method to be defined |
2 | the Duck class does implement the method using methodMissing |
3 | calling the speak method triggers a call to quack which is handled by methodMissing |
Dynamic methods in a trait
It is also possible for a trait to implement MOP methods like methodMissing
or propertyMissing
, in which case implementing classes
will inherit the behavior from the trait, like in this example:
trait DynamicObject { (1)
private Map props = [:]
def methodMissing(String name, args) {
name.toUpperCase()
}
def propertyMissing(String prop) {
props[prop]
}
void setProperty(String prop, Object value) {
props[prop] = value
}
}
class Dynamic implements DynamicObject {
String existingProperty = 'ok' (2)
String existingMethod() { 'ok' } (3)
}
def d = new Dynamic()
assert d.existingProperty == 'ok' (4)
assert d.foo == null (5)
d.foo = 'bar' (6)
assert d.foo == 'bar' (7)
assert d.existingMethod() == 'ok' (8)
assert d.someMethod() == 'SOMEMETHOD' (9)
1 | create a trait implementing several MOP methods |
2 | the Dynamic class defines a property |
3 | the Dynamic class defines a method |
4 | calling an existing property will call the method from Dynamic |
5 | calling an non-existing property will call the method from the trait |
6 | will call setProperty defined on the trait |
7 | will call getProperty defined on the trait |
8 | calling an existing method on Dynamic |
9 | but calling a non existing method thanks to the trait methodMissing |
Multiple inheritance conflicts
Default conflict resolution
It is possible for a class to implement multiple traits. If some trait defines a method with the same signature as a method in another trait, we have a conflict:
trait A {
String exec() { 'A' } (1)
}
trait B {
String exec() { 'B' } (2)
}
class C implements A,B {} (3)
1 | trait A defines a method named exec returning a String |
2 | trait B defines the very same method |
3 | class C implements both traits |
In this case, the default behavior is that the method from the last declared trait in the implements
clause wins.
Here, B
is declared after A
so the method from B
will be picked up:
def c = new C()
assert c.exec() == 'B'
User conflict resolution
In case this behavior is not the one you want, you can explicitly choose which method to call using the Trait.super.foo
syntax.
In the example above, we can ensure the method from trait A is invoked by writing this:
class C implements A,B {
String exec() { A.super.exec() } (1)
}
def c = new C()
assert c.exec() == 'A' (2)
1 | explicit call of exec from the trait A |
2 | calls the version from A instead of using the default resolution, which would be the one from B |
Runtime implementation of traits
Implementing a trait at runtime
Groovy also supports implementing traits dynamically at runtime. It allows you to "decorate" an existing object using a trait. As an example, let’s start with this trait and the following class:
trait Extra {
String extra() { "I'm an extra method" } (1)
}
class Something { (2)
String doSomething() { 'Something' } (3)
}
1 | the Extra trait defines an extra method |
2 | the Something class does not implement the Extra trait |
3 | Something only defines a method doSomething |
Then if we do:
def s = new Something()
s.extra()
the call to extra would fail because Something
is not implementing Extra
. It is possible to do it at runtime with
the following syntax:
def s = new Something() as Extra (1)
s.extra() (2)
s.doSomething() (3)
1 | use of the as keyword to coerce an object to a trait at runtime |
2 | then extra can be called on the object |
3 | and doSomething is still callable |
When coercing an object to a trait, the result of the operation is not the same instance. It is guaranteed that the coerced object will implement both the trait and the interfaces that the original object implements, but the result will not be an instance of the original class. |
Implementing multiple traits at once
Should you need to implement several traits at once, you can use the withTraits
method instead of the as
keyword:
trait A { void methodFromA() {} }
trait B { void methodFromB() {} }
class C {}
def c = new C()
c.methodFromA() (1)
c.methodFromB() (2)
def d = c.withTraits A, B (3)
d.methodFromA() (4)
d.methodFromB() (5)
1 | call to methodFromA will fail because C doesn’t implement A |
2 | call to methodFromB will fail because C doesn’t implement B |
3 | withTrait will wrap c into something which implements A and B |
4 | methodFromA will now pass because d implements A |
5 | methodFromB will now pass because d also implements B |
When coercing an object to multiple traits, the result of the operation is not the same instance. It is guaranteed that the coerced object will implement both the traits and the interfaces that the original object implements, but the result will not be an instance of the original class. |
Chaining behavior
Groovy supports the concept of stackable traits. The idea is to delegate from one trait to the other if the current trait is not capable of handling a message. To illustrate this, let’s imagine a message handler interface like this:
interface MessageHandler {
void on(String message, Map payload)
}
Then you can compose a message handler by applying small behaviors. For example, let’s define a default handler in the form of a trait:
trait DefaultHandler implements MessageHandler {
void on(String message, Map payload) {
println "Received $message with payload $payload"
}
}
Then any class can inherit the behavior of the default handler by implementing the trait:
class SimpleHandler implements DefaultHandler {}
Now what if you want to log all messages, in addition to the default handler? One option is to write this:
class SimpleHandlerWithLogging implements DefaultHandler {
void on(String message, Map payload) { (1)
println "Seeing $message with payload $payload" (2)
DefaultHandler.super.on(message, payload) (3)
}
}
1 | explicitly implement the on method |
2 | perform logging |
3 | continue by delegating to the DefaultHandler trait |
This works but this approach has drawbacks:
-
the logging logic is bound to a "concrete" handler
-
we have an explicit reference to
DefaultHandler
in theon
method, meaning that if we happen to change the trait that our class implements, code will be broken
As an alternative, we can write another trait which responsibility is limited to logging:
trait LoggingHandler implements MessageHandler { (1)
void on(String message, Map payload) {
println "Seeing $message with payload $payload" (2)
super.on(message, payload) (3)
}
}
1 | the logging handler is itself a handler |
2 | prints the message it receives |
3 | then super makes it delegate the call to the next trait in the chain |
Then our class can be rewritten as this:
class HandlerWithLogger implements DefaultHandler, LoggingHandler {}
def loggingHandler = new HandlerWithLogger()
loggingHandler.on('test logging', [:])
which will print:
Seeing test logging with payload [:] Received test logging with payload [:]
As the priority rules imply that LoggerHandler
wins because it is declared last, then a call to on
will use
the implementation from LoggingHandler
. But the latter has a call to super
, which means the next trait in the
chain. Here, the next trait is DefaultHandler
so both will be called:
The interest of this approach becomes more evident if we add a third handler, which is responsible for handling messages
that start with say
:
trait SayHandler implements MessageHandler {
void on(String message, Map payload) {
if (message.startsWith("say")) { (1)
println "I say ${message - 'say'}!"
} else {
super.on(message, payload) (2)
}
}
}
1 | a handler specific precondition |
2 | if the precondition is not met, pass the message to the next handler in the chain |
Then our final handler looks like this:
class Handler implements DefaultHandler, SayHandler, LoggingHandler {}
def h = new Handler()
h.on('foo', [:])
h.on('sayHello', [:])
Which means:
-
messages will first go through the logging handler
-
the logging handler calls
super
which will delegate to the next handler, which is theSayHandler
-
if the message starts with
say
, then the handler consumes the message -
if not, the
say
handler delegates to the next handler in the chain
This approach is very powerful because it allows you to write handlers that do not know each other and yet let you combine them in the order you want. For example, if we execute the code, it will print:
Seeing foo with payload [:] Received foo with payload [:] Seeing sayHello with payload [:] I say Hello!
but if we move the logging handler to be the second one in the chain, the output is different:
class AlternateHandler implements DefaultHandler, LoggingHandler, SayHandler {}
h = new AlternateHandler()
h.on('foo', [:])
h.on('sayHello', [:])
prints:
Seeing foo with payload [:] Received foo with payload [:] I say Hello!
The reason is that now, since the SayHandler
consumes the message without calling super
, the logging handler is
not called anymore.
Semantics of super inside a trait
If a class implements multiple traits and a call to an unqualified super
is found, then:
-
if the class implements another trait, the call delegates to the next trait in the chain
-
if there isn’t any trait left in the chain,
super
refers to the super class of the implementing class (this)
For example, it is possible to decorate final classes thanks to this behavior:
trait Filtering { (1)
StringBuilder append(String str) { (2)
def subst = str.replace('o','') (3)
super.append(subst) (4)
}
String toString() { super.toString() } (5)
}
def sb = new StringBuilder().withTraits Filtering (6)
sb.append('Groovy')
assert sb.toString() == 'Grvy' (7)
1 | define a trait named Filtering , supposed to be applied on a StringBuilder at runtime |
2 | redefine the append method |
3 | remove all 'o’s from the string |
4 | then delegate to super |
5 | in case toString is called, delegate to super.toString |
6 | runtime implementation of the Filtering trait on a StringBuilder instance |
7 | the string which has been appended no longer contains the letter o |
In this example, when super.append
is encountered, there is no other trait implemented by the target object, so the
method which is called is the original append
method, that is to say the one from StringBuilder
. The same trick
is used for toString
, so that the string representation of the proxy object which is generated delegates to the
toString
of the StringBuilder
instance.
Advanced features
SAM type coercion
If a trait defines a single abstract method, it is candidate for SAM (Single Abstract Method) type coercion. For example, imagine the following trait:
trait Greeter {
String greet() { "Hello $name" } (1)
abstract String getName() (2)
}
1 | the greet method is not abstract and calls the abstract method getName |
2 | getName is an abstract method |
Since getName
is the single abstract method in the Greeter
trait, you can write:
Greeter greeter = { 'Alice' } (1)
1 | the closure "becomes" the implementation of the getName single abstract method |
or even:
void greet(Greeter g) { println g.greet() } (1)
greet { 'Alice' } (2)
1 | the greet method accepts the SAM type Greeter as parameter |
2 | we can call it directly with a closure |
Differences with Java 8 default methods
In Java 8, interfaces can have default implementations of methods. If a class implements an interface and does not provide an implementation for a default method, then the implementation from the interface is chosen. Traits behave the same but with a major difference: the implementation from the trait is always used if the class declares the trait in its interface list and that it doesn’t provide an implementation even if a super class does.
This feature can be used to compose behaviors in an very precise way, in case you want to override the behavior of an already implemented method.
To illustrate the concept, let’s start with this simple example:
import groovy.test.GroovyTestCase
import groovy.transform.CompileStatic
import org.codehaus.groovy.control.CompilerConfiguration
import org.codehaus.groovy.control.customizers.ASTTransformationCustomizer
import org.codehaus.groovy.control.customizers.ImportCustomizer
class SomeTest extends GroovyTestCase {
def config
def shell
void setup() {
config = new CompilerConfiguration()
shell = new GroovyShell(config)
}
void testSomething() {
assert shell.evaluate('1+1') == 2
}
void otherTest() { /* ... */ }
}
In this example, we create a simple test case which uses two properties (config and shell) and uses those in
multiple test methods. Now imagine that you want to test the same, but with another distinct compiler configuration.
One option is to create a subclass of SomeTest
:
class AnotherTest extends SomeTest {
void setup() {
config = new CompilerConfiguration()
config.addCompilationCustomizers( ... )
shell = new GroovyShell(config)
}
}
It works, but what if you have actually multiple test classes, and that you want to test the new configuration for all those test classes? Then you would have to create a distinct subclass for each test class:
class YetAnotherTest extends SomeTest {
void setup() {
config = new CompilerConfiguration()
config.addCompilationCustomizers( ... )
shell = new GroovyShell(config)
}
}
Then what you see is that the setup
method of both tests is the same. The idea, then, is to create a trait:
trait MyTestSupport {
void setup() {
config = new CompilerConfiguration()
config.addCompilationCustomizers( new ASTTransformationCustomizer(CompileStatic) )
shell = new GroovyShell(config)
}
}
Then use it in the subclasses:
class AnotherTest extends SomeTest implements MyTestSupport {}
class YetAnotherTest extends SomeTest2 implements MyTestSupport {}
...
It would allow us to dramatically reduce the boilerplate code, and reduces the risk of forgetting to change the setup
code in case we decide to change it. Even if setup
is already implemented in the super class, since the test class declares
the trait in its interface list, the behavior will be borrowed from the trait implementation!
This feature is in particular useful when you don’t have access to the super class source code. It can be used to mock methods or force a particular implementation of a method in a subclass. It lets you refactor your code to keep the overridden logic in a single trait and inherit a new behavior just by implementing it. The alternative, of course, is to override the method in every place you would have used the new code.
It’s worth noting that if you use runtime traits, the methods from the trait are always preferred to those of the proxied object: |
class Person {
String name (1)
}
trait Bob {
String getName() { 'Bob' } (2)
}
def p = new Person(name: 'Alice')
assert p.name == 'Alice' (3)
def p2 = p as Bob (4)
assert p2.name == 'Bob' (5)
1 | the Person class defines a name property which results in a getName method |
2 | Bob is a trait which defines getName as returning Bob |
3 | the default object will return Alice |
4 | p2 coerces p into Bob at runtime |
5 | getName returns Bob because getName is taken from the trait |
Again, don’t forget that dynamic trait coercion returns a distinct object which only implements the original interfaces, as well as the traits. |
Differences with mixins
There are several conceptual differences with mixins, as they are available in Groovy. Note that we are talking about runtime mixins, not the @Mixin annotation which is deprecated in favour of traits.
First of all, methods defined in a trait are visible in bytecode:
-
internally, the trait is represented as an interface (without default or static methods) and several helper classes
-
this means that an object implementing a trait effectively implements an interface
-
those methods are visible from Java
-
they are compatible with type checking and static compilation
Methods added through a mixin are, on the contrary, only visible at runtime:
class A { String methodFromA() { 'A' } } (1)
class B { String methodFromB() { 'B' } } (2)
A.metaClass.mixin B (3)
def o = new A()
assert o.methodFromA() == 'A' (4)
assert o.methodFromB() == 'B' (5)
assert o instanceof A (6)
assert !(o instanceof B) (7)
1 | class A defines methodFromA |
2 | class B defines methodFromB |
3 | mixin B into A |
4 | we can call methodFromA |
5 | we can also call methodFromB |
6 | the object is an instance of A |
7 | but it’s not an instanceof B |
The last point is actually a very important and illustrates a place where mixins have an advantage over traits: the instances are not modified, so if you mixin some class into another, there isn’t a third class generated, and methods which respond to A will continue responding to A even if mixed in.
Static methods, properties and fields
The following instructions are subject to caution. Static member support is work in progress and still experimental. The information below is valid for 3.0.7 only. |
It is possible to define static methods in a trait, but it comes with numerous limitations:
-
Traits with static methods cannot be compiled statically or type checked. All static methods, properties and field are accessed dynamically (it’s a limitation from the JVM).
-
Static methods do not appear within the generated interfaces for each trait.
-
The trait is interpreted as a template for the implementing class, which means that each implementing class will get its own static methods, properties and fields. So a static member declared on a trait doesn’t belong to the
Trait
, but to its implementing class. -
You should typically not mix static and instance methods of the same signature. The normal rules for applying traits apply (including multiple inheritance conflict resolution). If the method chosen is static but some implemented trait has an instance variant, a compilation error will occur. If the method chosen is the instance variant, the static variant will be ignored (the behavior is similar to static methods in Java interfaces for this case).
Let’s start with a simple example:
trait TestHelper {
public static boolean CALLED = false (1)
static void init() { (2)
CALLED = true (3)
}
}
class Foo implements TestHelper {}
Foo.init() (4)
assert Foo.TestHelper__CALLED (5)
1 | the static field is declared in the trait |
2 | a static method is also declared in the trait |
3 | the static field is updated within the trait |
4 | a static method init is made available to the implementing class |
5 | the static field is remapped to avoid the diamond issue |
As usual, it is not recommended to use public fields. Anyway, should you want this, you must understand that the following code would fail:
Foo.CALLED = true
because there is no static field CALLED defined on the trait itself. Likewise, if you have two distinct implementing classes, each one gets a distinct static field:
class Bar implements TestHelper {} (1)
class Baz implements TestHelper {} (2)
Bar.init() (3)
assert Bar.TestHelper__CALLED (4)
assert !Baz.TestHelper__CALLED (5)
1 | class Bar implements the trait |
2 | class Baz also implements the trait |
3 | init is only called on Bar |
4 | the static field CALLED on Bar is updated |
5 | but the static field CALLED on Baz is not, because it is distinct |
Inheritance of state gotchas
We have seen that traits are stateful. It is possible for a trait to define fields or properties, but when a class implements a trait, it gets those fields/properties on a per-trait basis. So consider the following example:
trait IntCouple {
int x = 1
int y = 2
int sum() { x+y }
}
The trait defines two properties, x
and y
, as well as a sum
method. Now let’s create a class which implements the trait:
class BaseElem implements IntCouple {
int f() { sum() }
}
def base = new BaseElem()
assert base.f() == 3
The result of calling f
is 3
, because f
delegates to sum
in the trait, which has state. But what if we write this instead?
class Elem implements IntCouple {
int x = 3 (1)
int y = 4 (2)
int f() { sum() } (3)
}
def elem = new Elem()
1 | Override property x |
2 | Override property y |
3 | Call sum from trait |
If you call elem.f()
, what is the expected output? Actually it is:
assert elem.f() == 3
The reason is that the sum
method accesses the fields of the trait. So it is using the x
and y
values defined
in the trait. If you want to use the values from the implementing class, then you need to dereference fields by using
getters and setters, like in this last example:
trait IntCouple {
int x = 1
int y = 2
int sum() { getX()+getY() }
}
class Elem implements IntCouple {
int x = 3
int y = 4
int f() { sum() }
}
def elem = new Elem()
assert elem.f() == 7
Self types
Type constraints on traits
Sometimes you will want to write a trait that can only be applied to some type. For example, you may want to apply a trait on a class that extends another class which is beyond your control, and still be able to call those methods. To illustrate this, let’s start with this example:
class CommunicationService {
static void sendMessage(String from, String to, String message) { (1)
println "$from sent [$message] to $to"
}
}
class Device { String id } (2)
trait Communicating {
void sendMessage(Device to, String message) {
CommunicationService.sendMessage(id, to.id, message) (3)
}
}
class MyDevice extends Device implements Communicating {} (4)
def bob = new MyDevice(id:'Bob')
def alice = new MyDevice(id:'Alice')
bob.sendMessage(alice,'secret') (5)
1 | A Service class, beyond your control (in a library, …) defines a sendMessage method |
2 | A Device class, beyond your control (in a library, …) |
3 | Defines a communicating trait for devices that can call the service |
4 | Defines MyDevice as a communicating device |
5 | The method from the trait is called, and id is resolved |
It is clear, here, that the Communicating
trait can only apply to Device
. However, there’s no explicit
contract to indicate that, because traits cannot extend classes. However, the code compiles and runs perfectly
fine, because id
in the trait method will be resolved dynamically. The problem is that there is nothing that
prevents the trait from being applied to any class which is not a Device
. Any class which has an id
would
work, while any class that does not have an id
property would cause a runtime error.
The problem is even more complex if you want to enable type checking or apply @CompileStatic
on the trait: because
the trait knows nothing about itself being a Device
, the type checker will complain saying that it does not find
the id
property.
One possibility is to explicitly add a getId
method in the trait, but it would not solve all issues. What if a method
requires this
as a parameter, and actually requires it to be a Device
?
class SecurityService {
static void check(Device d) { if (d.id==null) throw new SecurityException() }
}
If you want to be able to call this
in the trait, then you will explicitly need to cast this
into a Device
. This can
quickly become unreadable with explicit casts to this
everywhere.
The @SelfType annotation
In order to make this contract explicit, and to make the type checker aware of the type of itself, Groovy provides
a @SelfType
annotation that will:
-
let you declare the types that a class that implements this trait must inherit or implement
-
throw a compile time error if those type constraints are not satisfied
So in our previous example, we can fix the trait using the @groovy.transform.SelfType
annotation:
@SelfType(Device)
@CompileStatic
trait Communicating {
void sendMessage(Device to, String message) {
SecurityService.check(this)
CommunicationService.sendMessage(id, to.id, message)
}
}
Now if you try to implement this trait on a class that is not a device, a compile-time error will occur:
class MyDevice implements Communicating {} // forgot to extend Device
The error will be:
class 'MyDevice' implements trait 'Communicating' but does not extend self type class 'Device'
In conclusion, self types are a powerful way of declaring constraints on traits without having to declare the contract directly in the trait or having to use casts everywhere, maintaining separation of concerns as tight as it should be.
Limitations
Compatibility with AST transformations
Traits are not officially compatible with AST transformations. Some of them, like @CompileStatic will be applied
on the trait itself (not on implementing classes), while others will apply on both the implementing class and the trait.
There is absolutely no guarantee that an AST transformation will run on a trait as it does on a regular class, so use it
at your own risk!
|
Prefix and postfix operations
Within traits, prefix and postfix operations are not allowed if they update a field of the trait:
trait Counting {
int x
void inc() {
x++ (1)
}
void dec() {
--x (2)
}
}
class Counter implements Counting {}
def c = new Counter()
c.inc()
1 | x is defined within the trait, postfix increment is not allowed |
2 | x is defined within the trait, prefix decrement is not allowed |
A workaround is to use the +=
operator instead.
1.5. Closures
This chapter covers Groovy Closures. A closure in Groovy is an open, anonymous, block of code that can take arguments,
return a value and be assigned to a variable. A closure may reference variables declared in its surrounding scope. In
opposition to the formal definition of a closure, Closure
in the Groovy language can also contain free variables which
are defined outside of its surrounding scope. While breaking the formal concept of a closure, it offers a variety of
advantages which are described in this chapter.
1.5.1. Syntax
Defining a closure
A closure definition follows this syntax:
{ [closureParameters -> ] statements }
Where [closureParameters->]
is an optional comma-delimited list of
parameters, and statements are 0 or more Groovy statements. The parameters
look similar to a method parameter list, and these parameters may be
typed or untyped.
When a parameter list is specified, the ->
character
is required and serves to separate the arguments from the closure body.
The statements portion consists of 0, 1, or many Groovy statements.
Some examples of valid closure definitions:
{ item++ } (1)
{ -> item++ } (2)
{ println it } (3)
{ it -> println it } (4)
{ name -> println name } (5)
{ String x, int y -> (6)
println "hey ${x} the value is ${y}"
}
{ reader -> (7)
def line = reader.readLine()
line.trim()
}
1 | A closure referencing a variable named item |
2 | It is possible to explicitly separate closure parameters from code by adding an arrow (-> ) |
3 | A closure using an implicit parameter (it ) |
4 | An alternative version where it is an explicit parameter |
5 | In that case it is often better to use an explicit name for the parameter |
6 | A closure accepting two typed parameters |
7 | A closure can contain multiple statements |
Closures as an object
A closure is an instance of the groovy.lang.Closure
class, making it assignable to a variable or a field as any
other variable, despite being a block of code:
def listener = { e -> println "Clicked on $e.source" } (1)
assert listener instanceof Closure
Closure callback = { println 'Done!' } (2)
Closure<Boolean> isTextFile = {
File it -> it.name.endsWith('.txt') (3)
}
1 | You can assign a closure to a variable, and it is an instance of groovy.lang.Closure |
2 | If not using def or var , use groovy.lang.Closure as the type |
3 | Optionally, you can specify the return type of the closure by using the generic type of groovy.lang.Closure |
Calling a closure
A closure, as an anonymous block of code, can be called like any other method. If you define a closure which takes no argument like this:
def code = { 123 }
Then the code inside the closure will only be executed when you call the closure, which can be done by using the variable as if it was a regular method:
assert code() == 123
Alternatively, you can be explicit and use the call
method:
assert code.call() == 123
The principle is the same if the closure accepts arguments:
def isOdd = { int i -> i%2 != 0 } (1)
assert isOdd(3) == true (2)
assert isOdd.call(2) == false (3)
def isEven = { it%2 == 0 } (4)
assert isEven(3) == false (5)
assert isEven.call(2) == true (6)
1 | define a closure which accepts an int as a parameter |
2 | it can be called directly |
3 | or using the call method |
4 | same goes for a closure with an implicit argument (it ) |
5 | which can be called directly using (arg) |
6 | or using call |
Unlike a method, a closure always returns a value when called. The next section discusses how to declare closure arguments, when to use them and what is the implicit "it" parameter.
1.5.2. Parameters
Normal parameters
Parameters of closures follow the same principle as parameters of regular methods:
-
an optional type
-
a name
-
an optional default value
Parameters are separated with commas:
def closureWithOneArg = { str -> str.toUpperCase() }
assert closureWithOneArg('groovy') == 'GROOVY'
def closureWithOneArgAndExplicitType = { String str -> str.toUpperCase() }
assert closureWithOneArgAndExplicitType('groovy') == 'GROOVY'
def closureWithTwoArgs = { a,b -> a+b }
assert closureWithTwoArgs(1,2) == 3
def closureWithTwoArgsAndExplicitTypes = { int a, int b -> a+b }
assert closureWithTwoArgsAndExplicitTypes(1,2) == 3
def closureWithTwoArgsAndOptionalTypes = { a, int b -> a+b }
assert closureWithTwoArgsAndOptionalTypes(1,2) == 3
def closureWithTwoArgAndDefaultValue = { int a, int b=2 -> a+b }
assert closureWithTwoArgAndDefaultValue(1) == 3
Implicit parameter
When a closure does not explicitly define a parameter list (using ->
), a closure always defines an implicit
parameter, named it
. This means that this code:
def greeting = { "Hello, $it!" }
assert greeting('Patrick') == 'Hello, Patrick!'
is stricly equivalent to this one:
def greeting = { it -> "Hello, $it!" }
assert greeting('Patrick') == 'Hello, Patrick!'
If you want to declare a closure which accepts no argument and must be restricted to calls without arguments, then you must declare it with an explicit empty argument list:
def magicNumber = { -> 42 }
// this call will fail because the closure doesn't accept any argument
magicNumber(11)
Varargs
It is possible for a closure to declare variable arguments like any other method. Vargs methods are methods that can accept a variable number of arguments if the last parameter is of variable length (or an array) like in the next examples:
def concat1 = { String... args -> args.join('') } (1)
assert concat1('abc','def') == 'abcdef' (2)
def concat2 = { String[] args -> args.join('') } (3)
assert concat2('abc', 'def') == 'abcdef'
def multiConcat = { int n, String... args -> (4)
args.join('')*n
}
assert multiConcat(2, 'abc','def') == 'abcdefabcdef'
1 | A closure accepting a variable number of strings as first parameter |
2 | It may be called using any number of arguments without having to explicitly wrap them into an array |
3 | The same behavior is directly available if the args parameter is declared as an array |
4 | As long as the last parameter is an array or an explicit vargs type |
1.5.3. Delegation strategy
Groovy closures vs lambda expressions
Groovy defines closures as instances of the Closure class. It makes it very different from lambda expressions in Java 8. Delegation is a key concept in Groovy closures which has no equivalent in lambdas. The ability to change the delegate or change the delegation strategy of closures make it possible to design beautiful domain specific languages (DSLs) in Groovy.
Owner, delegate and this
To understand the concept of delegate, we must first explain the meaning of this
inside a closure. A closure actually
defines 3 distinct things:
-
this
corresponds to the enclosing class where the closure is defined -
owner
corresponds to the enclosing object where the closure is defined, which may be either a class or a closure -
delegate
corresponds to a third party object where methods calls or properties are resolved whenever the receiver of the message is not defined
The meaning of this
In a closure, calling getThisObject
will return the enclosing class where the closure is defined. It is equivalent to
using an explicit this
:
class Enclosing {
void run() {
def whatIsThisObject = { getThisObject() } (1)
assert whatIsThisObject() == this (2)
def whatIsThis = { this } (3)
assert whatIsThis() == this (4)
}
}
class EnclosedInInnerClass {
class Inner {
Closure cl = { this } (5)
}
void run() {
def inner = new Inner()
assert inner.cl() == inner (6)
}
}
class NestedClosures {
void run() {
def nestedClosures = {
def cl = { this } (7)
cl()
}
assert nestedClosures() == this (8)
}
}
1 | a closure is defined inside the Enclosing class, and returns getThisObject |
2 | calling the closure will return the instance of Enclosing where the closure is defined |
3 | in general, you will just want to use the shortcut this notation |
4 | and it returns exactly the same object |
5 | if the closure is defined in a inner class |
6 | this in the closure will return the inner class, not the top-level one |
7 | in case of nested closures, like here cl being defined inside the scope of nestedClosures |
8 | then this corresponds to the closest outer class, not the enclosing closure! |
It is of course possible to call methods from the enclosing class this way:
class Person {
String name
int age
String toString() { "$name is $age years old" }
String dump() {
def cl = {
String msg = this.toString() (1)
println msg
msg
}
cl()
}
}
def p = new Person(name:'Janice', age:74)
assert p.dump() == 'Janice is 74 years old'
1 | the closure calls toString on this , which will actually call the toString method on the enclosing object,
that is to say the Person instance |
Owner of a closure
The owner of a closure is very similar to the definition of this in a closure with a subtle difference: it will return the direct enclosing object, be it a closure or a class:
class Enclosing {
void run() {
def whatIsOwnerMethod = { getOwner() } (1)
assert whatIsOwnerMethod() == this (2)
def whatIsOwner = { owner } (3)
assert whatIsOwner() == this (4)
}
}
class EnclosedInInnerClass {
class Inner {
Closure cl = { owner } (5)
}
void run() {
def inner = new Inner()
assert inner.cl() == inner (6)
}
}
class NestedClosures {
void run() {
def nestedClosures = {
def cl = { owner } (7)
cl()
}
assert nestedClosures() == nestedClosures (8)
}
}
1 | a closure is defined inside the Enclosing class, and returns getOwner |
2 | calling the closure will return the instance of Enclosing where the closure is defined |
3 | in general, you will just want to use the shortcut owner notation |
4 | and it returns exactly the same object |
5 | if the closure is defined in a inner class |
6 | owner in the closure will return the inner class, not the top-level one |
7 | but in case of nested closures, like here cl being defined inside the scope of nestedClosures |
8 | then owner corresponds to the enclosing closure, hence a different object from this ! |
Delegate of a closure
The delegate of a closure can be accessed by using the delegate
property or calling the getDelegate
method. It is a
powerful concept for building domain specific languages in Groovy. While closure-this and closure-owner
refer to the lexical scope of a closure, the delegate is a user defined object that a closure will use. By default, the
delegate is set to owner
:
class Enclosing {
void run() {
def cl = { getDelegate() } (1)
def cl2 = { delegate } (2)
assert cl() == cl2() (3)
assert cl() == this (4)
def enclosed = {
{ -> delegate }.call() (5)
}
assert enclosed() == enclosed (6)
}
}
1 | you can get the delegate of a closure calling the getDelegate method |
2 | or using the delegate property |
3 | both return the same object |
4 | which is the enclosing class or closure |
5 | in particular in case of nested closures |
6 | delegate will correspond to the owner |
The delegate of a closure can be changed to any object. Let’s illustrate this by creating two classes which are not
subclasses of each other but both define a property called name
:
class Person {
String name
}
class Thing {
String name
}
def p = new Person(name: 'Norman')
def t = new Thing(name: 'Teapot')
Then let’s define a closure which fetches the name
property on the delegate:
def upperCasedName = { delegate.name.toUpperCase() }
Then by changing the delegate of the closure, you can see that the target object will change:
upperCasedName.delegate = p
assert upperCasedName() == 'NORMAN'
upperCasedName.delegate = t
assert upperCasedName() == 'TEAPOT'
At this point, the behavior is not different from having a target
variable defined in the lexical scope of the closure:
def target = p
def upperCasedNameUsingVar = { target.name.toUpperCase() }
assert upperCasedNameUsingVar() == 'NORMAN'
However, there are major differences:
-
in the last example, target is a local variable referenced from within the closure
-
the delegate can be used transparently, that is to say without prefixing method calls with
delegate.
as explained in the next paragraph.
Delegation strategy
Whenever, in a closure, a property is accessed without explicitly setting a receiver object, then a delegation strategy is involved:
class Person {
String name
}
def p = new Person(name:'Igor')
def cl = { name.toUpperCase() } (1)
cl.delegate = p (2)
assert cl() == 'IGOR' (3)
1 | name is not referencing a variable in the lexical scope of the closure |
2 | we can change the delegate of the closure to be an instance of Person |
3 | and the method call will succeed |
The reason this code works is that the name
property will be resolved transparently on the delegate
object! This is
a very powerful way to resolve properties or method calls inside closures. There’s no need to set an explicit delegate.
receiver: the call will be made because the default delegation strategy of the closure makes it so. A closure actually
defines multiple resolution strategies that you can choose:
-
Closure.OWNER_FIRST
is the default strategy. If a property/method exists on the owner, then it will be called on the owner. If not, then the delegate is used. -
Closure.DELEGATE_FIRST
reverses the logic: the delegate is used first, then the owner -
Closure.OWNER_ONLY
will only resolve the property/method lookup on the owner: the delegate will be ignored. -
Closure.DELEGATE_ONLY
will only resolve the property/method lookup on the delegate: the owner will be ignored. -
Closure.TO_SELF
can be used by developers who need advanced meta-programming techniques and wish to implement a custom resolution strategy: the resolution will not be made on the owner or the delegate but only on the closure class itself. It makes only sense to use this if you implement your own subclass ofClosure
.
Let’s illustrate the default "owner first" strategy with this code:
class Person {
String name
def pretty = { "My name is $name" } (1)
String toString() {
pretty()
}
}
class Thing {
String name (2)
}
def p = new Person(name: 'Sarah')
def t = new Thing(name: 'Teapot')
assert p.toString() == 'My name is Sarah' (3)
p.pretty.delegate = t (4)
assert p.toString() == 'My name is Sarah' (5)
1 | for the illustration, we define a closure member which references "name" |
2 | both the Person and the Thing class define a name property |
3 | Using the default strategy, the name property is resolved on the owner first |
4 | so if we change the delegate to t which is an instance of Thing |
5 | there is no change in the result: name is first resolved on the owner of the closure |
However, it is possible to change the resolution strategy of the closure:
p.pretty.resolveStrategy = Closure.DELEGATE_FIRST
assert p.toString() == 'My name is Teapot'
By changing the resolveStrategy
, we are modifying the way Groovy will resolve the "implicit this" references: in this
case, name
will first be looked in the delegate, then if not found, on the owner. Since name
is defined in the
delegate, an instance of Thing
, then this value is used.
The difference between "delegate first" and "delegate only" or "owner first" and "owner only" can be illustrated if one of the delegate (resp. owner) does not have such a method or property:
class Person {
String name
int age
def fetchAge = { age }
}
class Thing {
String name
}
def p = new Person(name:'Jessica', age:42)
def t = new Thing(name:'Printer')
def cl = p.fetchAge
cl.delegate = p
assert cl() == 42
cl.delegate = t
assert cl() == 42
cl.resolveStrategy = Closure.DELEGATE_ONLY
cl.delegate = p
assert cl() == 42
cl.delegate = t
try {
cl()
assert false
} catch (MissingPropertyException ex) {
// "age" is not defined on the delegate
}
In this example, we define two classes which both have a name
property but only the Person
class declares an age
.
The Person
class also declares a closure which references age
. We can change the default resolution strategy from
"owner first" to "delegate only". Since the owner of the closure is the Person
class, then we can check that if the
delegate is an instance of Person
, calling the closure is successful, but if we call it with a delegate being an
instance of Thing
, it fails with a groovy.lang.MissingPropertyException
. Despite the closure being defined inside
the Person
class, the owner is not used.
A comprehensive explanation about how to use this feature to develop DSLs can be found in a dedicated section of the manual. |
1.5.4. Closures in GStrings
Take the following code:
def x = 1
def gs = "x = ${x}"
assert gs == 'x = 1'
The code behaves as you would expect, but what happens if you add:
x = 2
assert gs == 'x = 2'
You will see that the assert fails! There are two reasons for this:
-
a GString only evaluates lazily the
toString
representation of values -
the syntax
${x}
in a GString does not represent a closure but an expression to$x
, evaluated when the GString is created.
In our example, the GString
is created with an expression referencing x
. When the GString
is created, the value
of x
is 1, so the GString
is created with a value of 1. When the assert is triggered, the GString
is evaluated
and 1 is converted to a String
using toString
. When we change x
to 2, we did change the value of x
, but it is
a different object, and the GString
still references the old one.
A GString will only change its toString representation if the values it references are mutating. If the references
change, nothing will happen.
|
If you need a real closure in a GString and for example enforce lazy evaluation of variables, you need to use the
alternate syntax ${→ x}
like in the fixed example:
def x = 1
def gs = "x = ${-> x}"
assert gs == 'x = 1'
x = 2
assert gs == 'x = 2'
And let’s illustrate how it differs from mutation with this code:
class Person {
String name
String toString() { name } (1)
}
def sam = new Person(name:'Sam') (2)
def lucy = new Person(name:'Lucy') (3)
def p = sam (4)
def gs = "Name: ${p}" (5)
assert gs == 'Name: Sam' (6)
p = lucy (7)
assert gs == 'Name: Sam' (8)
sam.name = 'Lucy' (9)
assert gs == 'Name: Lucy' (10)
1 | the Person class has a toString method returning the name property |
2 | we create a first Person named Sam |
3 | we create another Person named Lucy |
4 | the p variable is set to Sam |
5 | and a closure is created, referencing the value of p , that is to say Sam |
6 | so when we evaluate the string, it returns Sam |
7 | if we change p to Lucy |
8 | the string still evaluates to Sam because it was the value of p when the GString was created |
9 | so if we mutate Sam to change the name to Lucy |
10 | this time the GString is correctly mutated |
So if you don’t want to rely on mutating objects or wrapping objects, you must use closures in GString
by explicitly
declaring an empty argument list:
class Person {
String name
String toString() { name }
}
def sam = new Person(name:'Sam')
def lucy = new Person(name:'Lucy')
def p = sam
// Create a GString with lazy evaluation of "p"
def gs = "Name: ${-> p}"
assert gs == 'Name: Sam'
p = lucy
assert gs == 'Name: Lucy'
1.5.5. Closure coercion
Closures can be converted into interfaces or single-abstract method types. Please refer to this section of the manual for a complete description.
1.5.6. Functional programming
Closures, like lambda expressions in Java 8 are at the core of the functional programming paradigm in Groovy. Some functional programming
operations on functions are available directly on the Closure
class, like illustrated in this section.
Currying
In Groovy, currying refers to the concept of partial application. It does not correspond to the real concept of currying in functional programming because of the different scoping rules that Groovy applies on closures. Currying in Groovy will let you set the value of one parameter of a closure, and it will return a new closure accepting one less argument.
Left currying
Left currying is the fact of setting the left-most parameter of a closure, like in this example:
def nCopies = { int n, String str -> str*n } (1)
def twice = nCopies.curry(2) (2)
assert twice('bla') == 'blabla' (3)
assert twice('bla') == nCopies(2, 'bla') (4)
1 | the nCopies closure defines two parameters |
2 | curry will set the first parameter to 2 , creating a new closure (function) which accepts a single String |
3 | so the new function call be called with only a String |
4 | and it is equivalent to calling nCopies with two parameters |
Right currying
Similarily to left currying, it is possible to set the right-most parameter of a closure:
def nCopies = { int n, String str -> str*n } (1)
def blah = nCopies.rcurry('bla') (2)
assert blah(2) == 'blabla' (3)
assert blah(2) == nCopies(2, 'bla') (4)
1 | the nCopies closure defines two parameters |
2 | rcurry will set the last parameter to bla , creating a new closure (function) which accepts a single int |
3 | so the new function call be called with only an int |
4 | and it is equivalent to calling nCopies with two parameters |
Index based currying
In case a closure accepts more than 2 parameters, it is possible to set an arbitrary parameter using ncurry
:
def volume = { double l, double w, double h -> l*w*h } (1)
def fixedWidthVolume = volume.ncurry(1, 2d) (2)
assert volume(3d, 2d, 4d) == fixedWidthVolume(3d, 4d) (3)
def fixedWidthAndHeight = volume.ncurry(1, 2d, 4d) (4)
assert volume(3d, 2d, 4d) == fixedWidthAndHeight(3d) (5)
1 | the volume function defines 3 parameters |
2 | ncurry will set the second parameter (index = 1) to 2d , creating a new volume function which accepts length and height |
3 | that function is equivalent to calling volume omitting the width |
4 | it is also possible to set multiple parameters, starting from the specified index |
5 | the resulting function accepts as many parameters as the initial one minus the number of parameters set by ncurry |
Memoization
Memoization allows the result of the call of a closure to be cached. It is interesting if the computation done by a function (closure) is slow, but you know that this function is going to be called often with the same arguments. A typical example is the Fibonacci suite. A naive implementation may look like this:
def fib
fib = { long n -> n<2?n:fib(n-1)+fib(n-2) }
assert fib(15) == 610 // slow!
It is a naive implementation because 'fib' is often called recursively with the same arguments, leading to an exponential algorithm:
-
computing
fib(15)
requires the result offib(14)
andfib(13)
-
computing
fib(14)
requires the result offib(13)
andfib(12)
Since calls are recursive, you can already see that we will compute the same values again and again, although they could
be cached. This naive implementation can be "fixed" by caching the result of calls using memoize
:
fib = { long n -> n<2?n:fib(n-1)+fib(n-2) }.memoize()
assert fib(25) == 75025 // fast!
The cache works using the actual values of the arguments. This means that you should be very careful if you use memoization with something else than primitive or boxed primitive types. |
The behavior of the cache can be tweaked using alternate methods:
-
memoizeAtMost
will generate a new closure which caches at most n values -
memoizeAtLeast
will generate a new closure which caches at least n values -
memoizeBetween
will generate a new closure which caches at least n values and at most n values
The cache used in all memoize variants is a LRU cache.
Composition
Closure composition corresponds to the concept of function composition, that is to say creating a new function by composing two or more functions (chaining calls), as illustrated in this example:
def plus2 = { it + 2 }
def times3 = { it * 3 }
def times3plus2 = plus2 << times3
assert times3plus2(3) == 11
assert times3plus2(4) == plus2(times3(4))
def plus2times3 = times3 << plus2
assert plus2times3(3) == 15
assert plus2times3(5) == times3(plus2(5))
// reverse composition
assert times3plus2(3) == (times3 >> plus2)(3)
Trampoline
Recursive algorithms are often restricted by a physical limit: the maximum stack height. For example, if you call a method
that recursively calls itself too deep, you will eventually receive a StackOverflowException
.
An approach that helps in those situations is by using Closure
and its trampoline capability.
Closures are wrapped in a TrampolineClosure
. Upon calling, a trampolined Closure
will call the original Closure
waiting
for its result. If the outcome of the call is another instance of a TrampolineClosure
, created perhaps as a result
to a call to the trampoline()
method, the Closure
will again be invoked. This repetitive invocation of returned
trampolined Closures instances will continue until a value other than a trampolined Closure
is returned. That value
will become the final result of the trampoline. That way, calls are made serially, rather than filling the stack.
Here’s an example of the use of trampoline()
to implement the factorial function:
def factorial
factorial = { int n, def accu = 1G ->
if (n < 2) return accu
factorial.trampoline(n - 1, n * accu)
}
factorial = factorial.trampoline()
assert factorial(1) == 1
assert factorial(3) == 1 * 2 * 3
assert factorial(1000) // == 402387260.. plus another 2560 digits
Method pointers
It is often practical to be able to use a regular method as a closure. For example, you might want to use the currying abilities of a closure, but those are not available to normal methods. In Groovy, you can obtain a closure from any method with the method pointer operator.
1.6. Semantics
This chapter covers the semantics of the Groovy programming language.
1.6.1. Statements
Variable definition
Variables can be defined using either their type (like String
) or by using the keyword def
(or var
) followed by a variable name:
String x
def y
var z
def
and var
act as a type placeholder, i.e. a replacement for the type name,
when you do not want to give an explicit type.
It could be that you don’t care about the type at compile time
or are relying on type inference (with Groovy’s static nature).
It is mandatory for variable definitions to have a type or placeholder.
If left out, the type name will be deemed to refer to an existing variable (presumably declared earlier).
For scripts, undeclared variables are assumed to come from the Script binding.
In other cases, you will get a missing property (dynamic Groovy) or compile time error (static Groovy).
If you think of def
and var
as an alias of Object
, you will understand in an instant.
Variable definitions can provide an initial value, in which case it’s like having a declaration and assignment (which we cover next) all in one.
Variable definition types can be refined by using generics, like in List<String> names .
To learn more about the generics support, please read the generics section.
|
Variable assignment
You can assign values to variables for later use. Try the following:
x = 1
println x
x = new java.util.Date()
println x
x = -3.1499392
println x
x = false
println x
x = "Hi"
println x
Multiple assignment
Groovy supports multiple assignment, i.e. where multiple variables can be assigned at once, e.g.:
def (a, b, c) = [10, 20, 'foo']
assert a == 10 && b == 20 && c == 'foo'
You can provide types as part of the declaration if you wish:
def (int i, String j) = [10, 'foo']
assert i == 10 && j == 'foo'
As well as used when declaring variables it also applies to existing variables:
def nums = [1, 3, 5]
def a, b, c
(a, b, c) = nums
assert a == 1 && b == 3 && c == 5
The syntax works for arrays as well as lists, as well as methods that return either of these:
def (_, month, year) = "18th June 2009".split()
assert "In $month of $year" == 'In June of 2009'
Overflow and Underflow
If the left hand side has too many variables, excess ones are filled with null’s:
def (a, b, c) = [1, 2]
assert a == 1 && b == 2 && c == null
If the right hand side has too many variables, the extra ones are ignored:
def (a, b) = [1, 2, 3]
assert a == 1 && b == 2
Object destructuring with multiple assignment
In the section describing the various Groovy operators,
the case of the subscript operator has been covered,
explaining how you can override the getAt()
/putAt()
method.
With this technique, we can combine multiple assignments and the subscript operator methods to implement object destructuring.
Consider the following immutable Coordinates
class, containing a pair of longitude and latitude doubles,
and notice our implementation of the getAt()
method:
@Immutable
class Coordinates {
double latitude
double longitude
double getAt(int idx) {
if (idx == 0) latitude
else if (idx == 1) longitude
else throw new Exception("Wrong coordinate index, use 0 or 1")
}
}
Now let’s instantiate this class and destructure its longitude and latitude:
def coordinates = new Coordinates(latitude: 43.23, longitude: 3.67) (1)
def (la, lo) = coordinates (2)
assert la == 43.23 (3)
assert lo == 3.67
1 | we create an instance of the Coordinates class |
2 | then, we use a multiple assignment to get the individual longitude and latitude values |
3 | and we can finally assert their values. |
Control structures
Conditional structures
Groovy supports the usual if - else syntax from Java
def x = false
def y = false
if ( !x ) {
x = true
}
assert x == true
if ( x ) {
x = false
} else {
y = true
}
assert x == y
Groovy also supports the normal Java "nested" if then else if syntax:
if ( ... ) {
...
} else if (...) {
...
} else {
...
}
The switch statement in Groovy is backwards compatible with Java code; so you can fall through cases sharing the same code for multiple matches.
One difference though is that the Groovy switch statement can handle any kind of switch value and different kinds of matching can be performed.
def x = 1.23
def result = ""
switch ( x ) {
case "foo":
result = "found foo"
// lets fall through
case "bar":
result += "bar"
case [4, 5, 6, 'inList']:
result = "list"
break
case 12..30:
result = "range"
break
case Integer:
result = "integer"
break
case Number:
result = "number"
break
case ~/fo*/: // toString() representation of x matches the pattern?
result = "foo regex"
break
case { it < 0 }: // or { x < 0 }
result = "negative"
break
default:
result = "default"
}
assert result == "number"
Switch supports the following kinds of comparisons:
-
Class case values match if the switch value is an instance of the class
-
Regular expression case values match if the
toString()
representation of the switch value matches the regex -
Collection case values match if the switch value is contained in the collection. This also includes ranges (since they are Lists)
-
Closure case values match if the calling the closure returns a result which is true according to the Groovy truth
-
If none of the above are used then the case value matches if the case value equals the switch value
When using a closure case value, the default it parameter is actually the switch value (in our example, variable x ).
|
Looping structures
Groovy supports the standard Java / C for loop:
String message = ''
for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
message += 'Hi '
}
assert message == 'Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi '
The more elaborate form of Java’s classic for loop with comma-separate expressions is now supported. Example:
def facts = []
def count = 5
for (int fact = 1, i = 1; i <= count; i++, fact *= i) {
facts << fact
}
assert facts == [1, 2, 6, 24, 120]
Groovy has supported multi-assignment statements since Groovy 1.6:
// multi-assignment with types
def (String x, int y) = ['foo', 42]
assert "$x $y" == 'foo 42'
These can now appear in for loops:
// multi-assignment goes loopy
def baNums = []
for (def (String u, int v) = ['bar', 42]; v < 45; u++, v++) {
baNums << "$u $v"
}
assert baNums == ['bar 42', 'bas 43', 'bat 44']
The for loop in Groovy is much simpler and works with any kind of array, collection, Map, etc.
// iterate over a range
def x = 0
for ( i in 0..9 ) {
x += i
}
assert x == 45
// iterate over a list
x = 0
for ( i in [0, 1, 2, 3, 4] ) {
x += i
}
assert x == 10
// iterate over an array
def array = (0..4).toArray()
x = 0
for ( i in array ) {
x += i
}
assert x == 10
// iterate over a map
def map = ['abc':1, 'def':2, 'xyz':3]
x = 0
for ( e in map ) {
x += e.value
}
assert x == 6
// iterate over values in a map
x = 0
for ( v in map.values() ) {
x += v
}
assert x == 6
// iterate over the characters in a string
def text = "abc"
def list = []
for (c in text) {
list.add(c)
}
assert list == ["a", "b", "c"]
Groovy also supports the Java colon variation with colons: for (char c : text) {}
|
try / catch / finally
You can specify a complete try-catch-finally
, a try-catch
, or a try-finally
set of blocks.
Braces are required around each block’s body. |
try {
'moo'.toLong() // this will generate an exception
assert false // asserting that this point should never be reached
} catch ( e ) {
assert e in NumberFormatException
}
We can put code within a 'finally' clause following a matching 'try' clause, so that regardless of whether the code in the 'try' clause throws an exception, the code in the finally clause will always execute:
def z
try {
def i = 7, j = 0
try {
def k = i / j
assert false //never reached due to Exception in previous line
} finally {
z = 'reached here' //always executed even if Exception thrown
}
} catch ( e ) {
assert e in ArithmeticException
assert z == 'reached here'
}
Multi-catch
With the multi catch block (since Groovy 2.0), we’re able to define several exceptions to be catch and treated by the same catch block:
try {
/* ... */
} catch ( IOException | NullPointerException e ) {
/* one block to handle 2 exceptions */
}
ARM Try with resources
Groovy often provides better alternatives to Java 7’s try
-with-resources statement for Automatic Resource Management (ARM).
That syntax is now supported for Java programmers migrating to Groovy and still wanting to use the old style:
class FromResource extends ByteArrayInputStream {
@Override
void close() throws IOException {
super.close()
println "FromResource closing"
}
FromResource(String input) {
super(input.toLowerCase().bytes)
}
}
class ToResource extends ByteArrayOutputStream {
@Override
void close() throws IOException {
super.close()
println "ToResource closing"
}
}
def wrestle(s) {
try (
FromResource from = new FromResource(s)
ToResource to = new ToResource()
) {
to << from
return to.toString()
}
}
def wrestle2(s) {
FromResource from = new FromResource(s)
try (from; ToResource to = new ToResource()) { // Enhanced try-with-resources in Java 9+
to << from
return to.toString()
}
}
assert wrestle("ARM was here!").contains('arm')
assert wrestle2("ARM was here!").contains('arm')
Which yields the following output:
ToResource closing FromResource closing ToResource closing FromResource closing
Power assertion
Unlike Java with which Groovy shares the assert
keyword, the latter in Groovy behaves very differently. First of all,
an assertion in Groovy is always executed, independently of the -ea
flag of the JVM. It makes this a first class choice
for unit tests. The notion of "power asserts" is directly related to how the Groovy assert
behaves.
A power assertion is decomposed into 3 parts:
assert [left expression] == [right expression] : (optional message)
The result of the assertion is very different from what you would get in Java. If the assertion is true, then nothing happens. If the assertion is false, then it provides a visual representation of the value of each sub-expressions of the expression being asserted. For example:
assert 1+1 == 3
Will yield:
Caught: Assertion failed: assert 1+1 == 3 | | 2 false
Power asserts become very interesting when the expressions are more complex, like in the next example:
def x = 2
def y = 7
def z = 5
def calc = { a,b -> a*b+1 }
assert calc(x,y) == [x,z].sum()
Which will print the value for each sub-expression:
assert calc(x,y) == [x,z].sum()
| | | | | | |
15 2 7 | 2 5 7
false
In case you don’t want a pretty printed error message like above, you can fallback to a custom error message by changing the optional message part of the assertion, like in this example:
def x = 2
def y = 7
def z = 5
def calc = { a,b -> a*b+1 }
assert calc(x,y) == z*z : 'Incorrect computation result'
Which will print the following error message:
Incorrect computation result. Expression: (calc.call(x, y) == (z * z)). Values: z = 5, z = 5
Labeled statements
Any statement can be associated with a label. Labels do not impact the semantics of the code and can be used to make the code easier to read like in the following example:
given:
def x = 1
def y = 2
when:
def z = x+y
then:
assert z == 3
Despite not changing the semantics of the labelled statement, it is possible to use labels in the break
instruction
as a target for jump, as in the next example. However, even if this is allowed, this coding style is in general considered
a bad practice:
for (int i=0;i<10;i++) {
for (int j=0;j<i;j++) {
println "j=$j"
if (j == 5) {
break exit
}
}
exit: println "i=$i"
}
It is important to understand that by default labels have no impact on the semantics of the code, however they belong to the abstract syntax tree (AST) so it is possible for an AST transformation to use that information to perform transformations over the code, hence leading to different semantics. This is in particular what the Spock Framework does to make testing easier.
1.6.2. Expressions
(TBD)
GPath expressions
GPath
is a path expression language integrated into Groovy which allows parts of nested structured data to be identified. In this
sense, it has similar aims and scope as XPath does for XML. GPath is often used in the context of processing XML, but it really applies
to any object graph. Where XPath uses a filesystem-like path notation, a tree hierarchy with parts separated by a slash /
, GPath use a
dot-object notation to perform object navigation.
As an example, you can specify a path to an object or element of interest:
-
a.b.c
→ for XML, yields all thec
elements insideb
insidea
-
a.b.c
→ for POJOs, yields thec
properties for all theb
properties ofa
(sort of likea.getB().getC()
in JavaBeans)
In both cases, the GPath expression can be viewed as a query on an object graph. For POJOs, the object graph is most often built by the
program being written through object instantiation and composition; for XML processing, the object graph is the result of parsing
the XML text, most often with classes like XmlParser or XmlSlurper. See Processing XML
for more in-depth details on consuming XML in Groovy.
When querying the object graph generated from XmlParser or XmlSlurper, a GPath expression can refer to attributes defined on elements with
the
|
Object navigation
Let’s see an example of a GPath expression on a simple object graph, the one obtained using java reflection. Suppose you are in a non-static method of a
class having another method named aMethodFoo
void aMethodFoo() { println "This is aMethodFoo." } (0)
the following GPath expression will get the name of that method:
assert ['aMethodFoo'] == this.class.methods.name.grep(~/.*Foo/)
More precisely, the above GPath expression produces a list of String, each being the name of an existing method on this
where that name ends with Foo
.
Now, given the following methods also defined in that class:
void aMethodBar() { println "This is aMethodBar." } (1)
void anotherFooMethod() { println "This is anotherFooMethod." } (2)
void aSecondMethodBar() { println "This is aSecondMethodBar." } (3)
then the following GPath expression will get the names of (1) and (3), but not (2) or (0):
assert ['aMethodBar', 'aSecondMethodBar'] as Set == this.class.methods.name.grep(~/.*Bar/) as Set
Expression Deconstruction
We can decompose the expression this.class.methods.name.grep(~/.*Bar/)
to get an idea of how a GPath is evaluated:
this.class
-
property accessor, equivalent to
this.getClass()
in Java, yields aClass
object. this.class.methods
-
property accessor, equivalent to
this.getClass().getMethods()
, yields an array ofMethod
objects. this.class.methods.name
-
apply a property accessor on each element of an array and produce a list of the results.
this.class.methods.name.grep(…)
-
call method
grep
on each element of the list yielded bythis.class.methods.name
and produce a list of the results.
A sub-expression like this.class.methods yields an array because this is what calling this.getClass().getMethods() in Java
would produce. GPath expressions do not have a convention where a s means a list or anything like that.
|
One powerful feature of GPath expression is that property access on a collection is converted to a property access on each element of the collection with
the results collected into a collection. Therefore, the expression this.class.methods.name
could be expressed as follows in Java:
List<String> methodNames = new ArrayList<String>();
for (Method method : this.getClass().getMethods()) {
methodNames.add(method.getName());
}
return methodNames;
Array access notation can also be used in a GPath expression where a collection is present :
assert 'aSecondMethodBar' == this.class.methods.name.grep(~/.*Bar/).sort()[1]
array access are zero-based in GPath expressions |
GPath for XML navigation
Here is an example with a XML document and various form of GPath expressions:
def xmlText = """
| <root>
| <level>
| <sublevel id='1'>
| <keyVal>
| <key>mykey</key>
| <value>value 123</value>
| </keyVal>
| </sublevel>
| <sublevel id='2'>
| <keyVal>
| <key>anotherKey</key>
| <value>42</value>
| </keyVal>
| <keyVal>
| <key>mykey</key>
| <value>fizzbuzz</value>
| </keyVal>
| </sublevel>
| </level>
| </root>
"""
def root = new XmlSlurper().parseText(xmlText.stripMargin())
assert root.level.size() == 1 (1)
assert root.level.sublevel.size() == 2 (2)
assert root.level.sublevel.findAll { it.@id == 1 }.size() == 1 (3)
assert root.level.sublevel[1].keyVal[0].key.text() == 'anotherKey' (4)
1 | There is one level node under root |
2 | There are two sublevel nodes under root/level |
3 | There is one element sublevel having an attribute id with value 1 |
4 | Text value of key element of first keyVal element of second sublevel element under root/level is 'anotherKey' |
1.6.3. Promotion and coercion
Number promotion
The rules of number promotion are specified in the section on math operations.
Closure to type coercion
Assigning a closure to a SAM type
A SAM type is a type which defines a single abstract method. This includes:
interface Predicate<T> {
boolean accept(T obj)
}
abstract class Greeter {
abstract String getName()
void greet() {
println "Hello, $name"
}
}
Any closure can be converted into a SAM type using the as
operator:
Predicate filter = { it.contains 'G' } as Predicate
assert filter.accept('Groovy') == true
Greeter greeter = { 'Groovy' } as Greeter
greeter.greet()
However, the as Type
expression is optional since Groovy 2.2.0. You can omit it and simply write:
Predicate filter = { it.contains 'G' }
assert filter.accept('Groovy') == true
Greeter greeter = { 'Groovy' }
greeter.greet()
which means you are also allowed to use method pointers, as shown in the following example:
boolean doFilter(String s) { s.contains('G') }
Predicate filter = this.&doFilter
assert filter.accept('Groovy') == true
Greeter greeter = GroovySystem.&getVersion
greeter.greet()
Calling a method accepting a SAM type with a closure
The second and probably more important use case for closure to SAM type coercion is calling a method which accepts a SAM type. Imagine the following method:
public <T> List<T> filter(List<T> source, Predicate<T> predicate) {
source.findAll { predicate.accept(it) }
}
Then you can call it with a closure, without having to create an explicit implementation of the interface:
assert filter(['Java','Groovy'], { it.contains 'G'} as Predicate) == ['Groovy']
But since Groovy 2.2.0, you are also able to omit the explicit coercion and call the method as if it used a closure:
assert filter(['Java','Groovy']) { it.contains 'G'} == ['Groovy']
As you can see, this has the advantage of letting you use the closure syntax for method calls, that is to say put the closure outside of the parenthesis, improving the readability of your code.
Closure to arbitrary type coercion
In addition to SAM types, a closure can be coerced to any type and in particular interfaces. Let’s define the following interface:
interface FooBar {
int foo()
void bar()
}
You can coerce a closure into the interface using the as
keyword:
def impl = { println 'ok'; 123 } as FooBar
This produces a class for which all methods are implemented using the closure:
assert impl.foo() == 123
impl.bar()
But it is also possible to coerce a closure to any class. For example, we can replace the interface
that we defined
with class
without changing the assertions:
class FooBar {
int foo() { 1 }
void bar() { println 'bar' }
}
def impl = { println 'ok'; 123 } as FooBar
assert impl.foo() == 123
impl.bar()
Map to type coercion
Usually using a single closure to implement an interface or a class with multiple methods is not the way to go. As an
alternative, Groovy allows you to coerce a map into an interface or a class. In that case, keys of the map are
interpreted as method names, while the values are the method implementation. The following example illustrates the
coercion of a map into an Iterator
:
def map
map = [
i: 10,
hasNext: { map.i > 0 },
next: { map.i-- },
]
def iter = map as Iterator
Of course this is a rather contrived example, but illustrates the concept. You only need to implement those methods
that are actually called, but if a method is called that doesn’t exist in the map a MissingMethodException
or an
UnsupportedOperationException
is thrown, depending on the arguments passed to the call,
as in the following example:
interface X {
void f()
void g(int n)
void h(String s, int n)
}
x = [ f: {println "f called"} ] as X
x.f() // method exists
x.g() // MissingMethodException here
x.g(5) // UnsupportedOperationException here
The type of the exception depends on the call itself:
-
MissingMethodException
if the arguments of the call do not match those from the interface/class -
UnsupportedOperationException
if the arguments of the call match one of the overloaded methods of the interface/class
String to enum coercion
Groovy allows transparent String
(or GString
) to enum values coercion. Imagine you define the following enum:
enum State {
up,
down
}
then you can assign a string to the enum without having to use an explicit as
coercion:
State st = 'up'
assert st == State.up
It is also possible to use a GString
as the value:
def val = "up"
State st = "${val}"
assert st == State.up
However, this would throw a runtime error (IllegalArgumentException
):
State st = 'not an enum value'
Note that it is also possible to use implicit coercion in switch statements:
State switchState(State st) {
switch (st) {
case 'up':
return State.down // explicit constant
case 'down':
return 'up' // implicit coercion for return types
}
}
in particular, see how the case
use string constants. But if you call a method that uses an enum with a String
argument, you still have to use an explicit as
coercion:
assert switchState('up' as State) == State.down
assert switchState(State.down) == State.up
Custom type coercion
It is possible for a class to define custom coercion strategies by implementing the asType
method. Custom coercion
is invoked using the as
operator and is never implicit. As an example,
imagine you defined two classes, Polar
and Cartesian
, like in the following example:
class Polar {
double r
double phi
}
class Cartesian {
double x
double y
}
And that you want to convert from polar coordinates to cartesian coordinates. One way of doing this is to define
the asType
method in the Polar
class:
def asType(Class target) {
if (Cartesian==target) {
return new Cartesian(x: r*cos(phi), y: r*sin(phi))
}
}
which allows you to use the as
coercion operator:
def sigma = 1E-16
def polar = new Polar(r:1.0,phi:PI/2)
def cartesian = polar as Cartesian
assert abs(cartesian.x-sigma) < sigma
Putting it all together, the Polar
class looks like this:
class Polar {
double r
double phi
def asType(Class target) {
if (Cartesian==target) {
return new Cartesian(x: r*cos(phi), y: r*sin(phi))
}
}
}
but it is also possible to define asType
outside of the Polar
class, which can be practical if you want to define
custom coercion strategies for "closed" classes or classes for which you don’t own the source code, for example using
a metaclass:
Polar.metaClass.asType = { Class target ->
if (Cartesian==target) {
return new Cartesian(x: r*cos(phi), y: r*sin(phi))
}
}
Class literals vs variables and the as operator
Using the as
keyword is only possible if you have a static reference to a class, like in the following code:
interface Greeter {
void greet()
}
def greeter = { println 'Hello, Groovy!' } as Greeter // Greeter is known statically
greeter.greet()
But what if you get the class by reflection, for example by calling Class.forName
?
Class clazz = Class.forName('Greeter')
Trying to use the reference to the class with the as
keyword would fail:
greeter = { println 'Hello, Groovy!' } as clazz
// throws:
// unable to resolve class clazz
// @ line 9, column 40.
// greeter = { println 'Hello, Groovy!' } as clazz
It is failing because the as
keyword only works with class literals. Instead, you need to call the asType
method:
greeter = { println 'Hello, Groovy!' }.asType(clazz)
greeter.greet()
1.6.4. Optionality
Optional parentheses
Method calls can omit the parentheses if there is at least one parameter and there is no ambiguity:
println 'Hello World'
def maximum = Math.max 5, 10
Parentheses are required for method calls without parameters or ambiguous method calls:
println()
println(Math.max(5, 10))
Optional semicolons
In Groovy semicolons at the end of the line can be omitted, if the line contains only a single statement.
This means that:
assert true;
can be more idiomatically written as:
assert true
Multiple statements in a line require semicolons to separate them:
boolean a = true; assert a
1.6.5. The Groovy Truth
Groovy decides whether a expression is true or false by applying the rules given below.
Iterators and Enumerations
Iterators and Enumerations with further elements are coerced to true.
assert [0].iterator()
assert ![].iterator()
Vector v = [0] as Vector
Enumeration enumeration = v.elements()
assert enumeration
enumeration.nextElement()
assert !enumeration
Strings
Non-empty Strings, GStrings and CharSequences are coerced to true.
assert 'a'
assert !''
def nonEmpty = 'a'
assert "$nonEmpty"
def empty = ''
assert !"$empty"
Customizing the truth with asBoolean() methods
In order to customize whether groovy evaluates your object to true
or false
implement the asBoolean()
method:
class Color {
String name
boolean asBoolean(){
name == 'green' ? true : false
}
}
Groovy will call this method to coerce your object to a boolean value, e.g.:
assert new Color(name: 'green')
assert !new Color(name: 'red')
1.6.6. Typing
Optional typing
Optional typing is the idea that a program can work even if you don’t put an explicit type on a variable. Being a dynamic language, Groovy naturally implements that feature, for example when you declare a variable:
String aString = 'foo' (1)
assert aString.toUpperCase() (2)
1 | foo is declared using an explicit type, String |
2 | we can call the toUpperCase method on a String |
Groovy will let you write this instead:
def aString = 'foo' (1)
assert aString.toUpperCase() (2)
1 | foo is declared using def |
2 | we can still call the toUpperCase method, because the type of aString is resolved at runtime |
So it doesn’t matter that you use an explicit type here. It is in particular interesting when you combine this feature with static type checking, because the type checker performs type inference.
Likewise, Groovy doesn’t make it mandatory to declare the types of a parameter in a method:
String concat(String a, String b) {
a+b
}
assert concat('foo','bar') == 'foobar'
can be rewritten using def
as both return type and parameter types, in order to take advantage of duck typing, as
illustrated in this example:
def concat(def a, def b) { (1)
a+b
}
assert concat('foo','bar') == 'foobar' (2)
assert concat(1,2) == 3 (3)
1 | both the return type and the parameter types use def |
2 | it makes it possible to use the method with String |
3 | but also with int since the plus method is defined |
Using the def keyword here is recommended to describe the intent of a method which is supposed to work on any
type, but technically, we could use Object instead and the result would be the same: def is, in Groovy, strictly
equivalent to using Object .
|
Eventually, the type can be removed altogether from both the return type and the descriptor. But if you want to remove it from the return type, you then need to add an explicit modifier for the method, so that the compiler can make a difference between a method declaration and a method call, like illustrated in this example:
private concat(a,b) { (1)
a+b
}
assert concat('foo','bar') == 'foobar' (2)
assert concat(1,2) == 3 (3)
1 | if we want to omit the return type, an explicit modifier has to be set. |
2 | it is still possible to use the method with String |
3 | and also with int |
Omitting types is in general considered a bad practice in method parameters or method return types for public APIs.
While using def in a local variable is not really a problem because the visibility of the variable is limited to the
method itself, while set on a method parameter, def will be converted to Object in the method signature, making it
difficult for users to know which is the expected type of the arguments. This means that you should limit this to cases
where you are explicitly relying on duck typing.
|
Static type checking
By default, Groovy performs minimal type checking at compile time. Since it is primarily a dynamic language, most checks that a static compiler would normally do aren’t possible at compile time. A method added via runtime metaprogramming might alter a class or object’s runtime behavior. Let’s illustrate why in the following example:
class Person { (1)
String firstName
String lastName
}
def p = new Person(firstName: 'Raymond', lastName: 'Devos') (2)
assert p.formattedName == 'Raymond Devos' (3)
1 | the Person class only defines two properties, firstName and lastName |
2 | we can create an instance of Person |
3 | and call a method named formattedName |
It is quite common in dynamic languages for code such as the above example not to throw any error. How can this be?
In Java, this would typically fail at compile time. However, in Groovy, it will not fail at compile time, and if coded
correctly, will also not fail at runtime. In fact, to make this work at runtime, one possibility is to rely on
runtime metaprogramming. So just adding this line after the declaration of the Person
class is enough:
Person.metaClass.getFormattedName = { "$delegate.firstName $delegate.lastName" }
This means that in general, in Groovy, you can’t make any assumption about the type of an object beyond its declaration type, and even if you know it, you can’t determine at compile time what method will be called, or which property will be retrieved. It has a lot of interest, going from writing DSLs to testing, which is discussed in other sections of this manual.
However, if your program doesn’t rely on dynamic features and that you come from the static world (in particular, from
a Java mindset), not catching such "errors" at compile time can be surprising. As we have seen in the previous example,
the compiler cannot be sure this is an error. To make it aware that it is, you have to explicitly instruct the compiler
that you are switching to a type checked mode. This can be done by annotating a class or a method with @groovy.transform.TypeChecked
.
When type checking is activated, the compiler performs much more work:
-
type inference is activated, meaning that even if you use
def
on a local variable for example, the type checker will be able to infer the type of the variable from the assignments -
method calls are resolved at compile time, meaning that if a method is not declared on a class, the compiler will throw an error
-
in general, all the compile time errors that you are used to find in a static language will appear: method not found, property not found, incompatible types for method calls, number precision errors, …
In this section, we will describe the behavior of the type checker in various situations and explain the limits of using
@TypeChecked
on your code.
The @TypeChecked
annotation
The groovy.transform.TypeChecked
annotation enables type checking. It can be placed on a class:
@groovy.transform.TypeChecked
class Calculator {
int sum(int x, int y) { x+y }
}
Or on a method:
class Calculator {
@groovy.transform.TypeChecked
int sum(int x, int y) { x+y }
}
In the first case, all methods, properties, fields, inner classes, … of the annotated class will be type checked, whereas in the second case, only the method and potential closures or anonymous inner classes that it contains will be type checked.
The scope of type checking can be restricted. For example, if a class is type checked, you can instruct the type checker
to skip a method by annotating it with @TypeChecked(TypeCheckingMode.SKIP)
:
import groovy.transform.TypeChecked
import groovy.transform.TypeCheckingMode
@TypeChecked (1)
class GreetingService {
String greeting() { (2)
doGreet()
}
@TypeChecked(TypeCheckingMode.SKIP) (3)
private String doGreet() {
def b = new SentenceBuilder()
b.Hello.my.name.is.John (4)
b
}
}
def s = new GreetingService()
assert s.greeting() == 'Hello my name is John'
1 | the GreetingService class is marked as type checked |
2 | so the greeting method is automatically type checked |
3 | but doGreet is marked with SKIP |
4 | the type checker doesn’t complain about missing properties here |
In the previous example, SentenceBuilder
relies on dynamic code. There’s no real Hello
method or property, so the
type checker would normally complain and compilation would fail. Since the method that uses the builder is marked with
TypeCheckingMode.SKIP
, type checking is skipped for this method, so the code will compile, even if the rest of the
class is type checked.
The following sections describe the semantics of type checking in Groovy.
Type checking assignments
An object o
of type A
can be assigned to a variable of type T
if and only if:
-
T
equalsA
Date now = new Date()
-
or
T
is one ofString
,boolean
,Boolean
orClass
String s = new Date() // implicit call to toString Boolean boxed = 'some string' // Groovy truth boolean prim = 'some string' // Groovy truth Class clazz = 'java.lang.String' // class coercion
-
or
o
is null andT
is not a primitive typeString s = null // passes int i = null // fails
-
or
T
is an array andA
is an array and the component type ofA
is assignable to the component type ofT
int[] i = new int[4] // passes int[] i = new String[4] // fails
-
or
T
is an array andA
is a list and the component type ofA
is assignable to the component type ofT
int[] i = [1,2,3] // passes int[] i = [1,2, new Date()] // fails
-
or
T
is a superclass ofA
AbstractList list = new ArrayList() // passes LinkedList list = new ArrayList() // fails
-
or
T
is an interface implemented byA
List list = new ArrayList() // passes RandomAccess list = new LinkedList() // fails
-
or
T
orA
are a primitive type and their boxed types are assignableint i = 0 Integer bi = 1 int x = new Integer(123) double d = new Float(5f)
-
or
T
extendsgroovy.lang.Closure
andA
is a SAM-type (single abstract method type)Runnable r = { println 'Hello' } interface SAMType { int doSomething() } SAMType sam = { 123 } assert sam.doSomething() == 123 abstract class AbstractSAM { int calc() { 2* value() } abstract int value() } AbstractSAM c = { 123 } assert c.calc() == 246
-
or
T
andA
derive fromjava.lang.Number
and conform to the following table
T | A | Examples |
---|---|---|
Double |
Any but BigDecimal or BigInteger |
|
Float |
Any type but BigDecimal, BigInteger or Double |
|
Long |
Any type but BigDecimal, BigInteger, Double or Float |
|
Integer |
Any type but BigDecimal, BigInteger, Double, Float or Long |
|
Short |
Any type but BigDecimal, BigInteger, Double, Float, Long or Integer |
|
Byte |
Byte |
|
List and map constructors
In addition to the assignment rules above, if an assignment is deemed invalid, in type checked mode, a list literal or a map literal A
can be assigned
to a variable of type T
if:
-
the assignment is a variable declaration and
A
is a list literal andT
has a constructor whose parameters match the types of the elements in the list literal -
the assignment is a variable declaration and
A
is a map literal andT
has a no-arg constructor and a property for each of the map keys
For example, instead of writing:
@groovy.transform.TupleConstructor
class Person {
String firstName
String lastName
}
Person classic = new Person('Ada','Lovelace')
You can use a "list constructor":
Person list = ['Ada','Lovelace']
or a "map constructor":
Person map = [firstName:'Ada', lastName:'Lovelace']
If you use a map constructor, additional checks are done on the keys of the map to check if a property of the same name is defined. For example, the following will fail at compile time:
@groovy.transform.TupleConstructor
class Person {
String firstName
String lastName
}
Person map = [firstName:'Ada', lastName:'Lovelace', age: 24] (1)
1 | The type checker will throw an error No such property: age for class: Person at compile time |
Method resolution
In type checked mode, methods are resolved at compile time. Resolution works by name and arguments. The return type is irrelevant to method selection. Types of arguments are matched against the types of the parameters following those rules:
An argument o
of type A
can be used for a parameter of type T
if and only if:
-
T
equalsA
int sum(int x, int y) { x+y } assert sum(3,4) == 7
-
or
T
is aString
andA
is aGString
String format(String str) { "Result: $str" } assert format("${3+4}") == "Result: 7"
-
or
o
is null andT
is not a primitive typeString format(int value) { "Result: $value" } assert format(7) == "Result: 7" format(null) // fails
-
or
T
is an array andA
is an array and the component type ofA
is assignable to the component type ofT
String format(String[] values) { "Result: ${values.join(' ')}" } assert format(['a','b'] as String[]) == "Result: a b" format([1,2] as int[]) // fails
-
or
T
is a superclass ofA
String format(AbstractList list) { list.join(',') } format(new ArrayList()) // passes String format(LinkedList list) { list.join(',') } format(new ArrayList()) // fails
-
or
T
is an interface implemented byA
String format(List list) { list.join(',') } format(new ArrayList()) // passes String format(RandomAccess list) { 'foo' } format(new LinkedList()) // fails
-
or
T
orA
are a primitive type and their boxed types are assignableint sum(int x, Integer y) { x+y } assert sum(3, new Integer(4)) == 7 assert sum(new Integer(3), 4) == 7 assert sum(new Integer(3), new Integer(4)) == 7 assert sum(new Integer(3), 4) == 7
-
or
T
extendsgroovy.lang.Closure
andA
is a SAM-type (single abstract method type)interface SAMType { int doSomething() } int twice(SAMType sam) { 2*sam.doSomething() } assert twice { 123 } == 246 abstract class AbstractSAM { int calc() { 2* value() } abstract int value() } int eightTimes(AbstractSAM sam) { 4*sam.calc() } assert eightTimes { 123 } == 984
-
or
T
andA
derive fromjava.lang.Number
and conform to the same rules as assignment of numbers
If a method with the appropriate name and arguments is not found at compile time, an error is thrown. The difference with "normal" Groovy is illustrated in the following example:
class MyService {
void doSomething() {
printLine 'Do something' (1)
}
}
1 | printLine is an error, but since we’re in a dynamic mode, the error is not caught at compile time |
The example above shows a class that Groovy will be able to compile. However, if you try to create an instance of MyService
and call the
doSomething
method, then it will fail at runtime, because printLine
doesn’t exist. Of course, we already showed how Groovy could make
this a perfectly valid call, for example by catching MethodMissingException
or implementing a custom meta-class, but if you know you’re
not in such a case, @TypeChecked
comes handy:
@groovy.transform.TypeChecked
class MyService {
void doSomething() {
printLine 'Do something' (1)
}
}
1 | printLine is this time a compile-time error |
Just adding @TypeChecked
will trigger compile time method resolution. The type checker will try to find a method printLine
accepting
a String
on the MyService
class, but cannot find one. It will fail compilation with the following message:
Cannot find matching method MyService#printLine(java.lang.String)
It is important to understand the logic behind the type checker: it is a compile-time check, so by definition, the type checker
is not aware of any kind of runtime metaprogramming that you do. This means that code which is perfectly valid without @TypeChecked will
not compile anymore if you activate type checking. This is in particular true if you think of duck typing: |
class Duck {
void quack() { (1)
println 'Quack!'
}
}
class QuackingBird {
void quack() { (2)
println 'Quack!'
}
}
@groovy.transform.TypeChecked
void accept(quacker) {
quacker.quack() (3)
}
accept(new Duck()) (4)
1 | we define a Duck class which defines a quack method |
2 | we define another QuackingBird class which also defines a quack method |
3 | quacker is loosely typed, so since the method is @TypeChecked , we will obtain a compile-time error |
4 | even if in non type-checked Groovy, this would have passed |
There are possible workarounds, like introducing an interface, but basically, by activating type checking, you gain type safety but you loose some features of the language. Hopefully, Groovy introduces some features like flow typing to reduce the gap between type-checked and non type-checked Groovy.
Type inference
When code is annotated with @TypeChecked
, the compiler performs type inference. It doesn’t simply rely on static types, but also uses various
techniques to infer the types of variables, return types, literals, … so that the code remains as clean as possible even if you activate the
type checker.
The simplest example is inferring the type of a variable:
def message = 'Welcome to Groovy!' (1)
println message.toUpperCase() (2)
println message.upper() // compile time error (3)
1 | a variable is declared using the def keyword |
2 | calling toUpperCase is allowed by the type checker |
3 | calling upper will fail at compile time |
The reason the call to toUpperCase
works is because the type of message
was inferred as being a String
.
It is worth noting that although the compiler performs type inference on local variables, it does not perform any kind of type inference on fields, always falling back to the declared type of a field. To illustrate this, let’s take a look at this example:
class SomeClass {
def someUntypedField (1)
String someTypedField (2)
void someMethod() {
someUntypedField = '123' (3)
someUntypedField = someUntypedField.toUpperCase() // compile-time error (4)
}
void someSafeMethod() {
someTypedField = '123' (5)
someTypedField = someTypedField.toUpperCase() (6)
}
void someMethodUsingLocalVariable() {
def localVariable = '123' (7)
someUntypedField = localVariable.toUpperCase() (8)
}
}
1 | someUntypedField uses def as a declaration type |
2 | someTypedField uses String as a declaration type |
3 | we can assign anything to someUntypedField |
4 | yet calling toUpperCase fails at compile time because the field is not typed properly |
5 | we can assign a String to a field of type String |
6 | and this time toUpperCase is allowed |
7 | if we assign a String to a local variable |
8 | then calling toUpperCase is allowed on the local variable |
Why such a difference? The reason is thread safety. At compile time, we can’t make any guarantee about the type of a field. Any thread can access any field at any time and between the moment a field is assigned a variable of some type in a method and the time is is used the line after, another thread may have changed the contents of the field. This is not the case for local variables: we know if they "escape" or not, so we can make sure that the type of a variable is constant (or not) over time. Note that even if a field is final, the JVM makes no guarantee about it, so the type checker doesn’t behave differently if a field is final or not.
This is one of the reasons why we recommend to use typed fields. While using def for local variables is perfectly
fine thanks to type inference, this is not the case for fields, which also belong to the public API of a class, hence the
type is important.
|
Groovy provides a syntax for various type literals. There are three native collection literals in Groovy:
-
lists, using the
[]
literal -
maps, using the
[:]
literal -
ranges, using
from..to
(inclusive) andfrom..<to
(exclusive)
The inferred type of a literal depends on the elements of the literal, as illustrated in the following table:
Literal | Inferred type |
---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As you can see, with the noticeable exception of the IntRange
, the inferred type makes use of generics types to describe
the contents of a collection. In case the collection contains elements of different types, the type checker still performs
type inference of the components, but uses the notion of least upper bound.
In Groovy, the least upper bound of two types A
and B
is defined as a type which:
-
superclass corresponds to the common super class of
A
andB
-
interfaces correspond to the interfaces implemented by both
A
andB
-
if
A
orB
is a primitive type and thatA
isn’t equal toB
, the least upper bound ofA
andB
is the least upper bound of their wrapper types
If A
and B
only have one (1) interface in common and that their common superclass is Object
, then the LUB of both
is the common interface.
The least upper bound represents the minimal type to which both A
and B
can be assigned. So for example, if A
and B
are both String
, then the LUB (least upper bound) of both is also String
.
class Top {}
class Bottom1 extends Top {}
class Bottom2 extends Top {}
assert leastUpperBound(String, String) == String (1)
assert leastUpperBound(ArrayList, LinkedList) == AbstractList (2)
assert leastUpperBound(ArrayList, List) == List (3)
assert leastUpperBound(List, List) == List (4)
assert leastUpperBound(Bottom1, Bottom2) == Top (5)
assert leastUpperBound(List, Serializable) == Object (6)
1 | the LUB of String and String is String |
2 | the LUB of ArrayList and LinkedList is their common super type, AbstractList |
3 | the LUB of ArrayList and List is their only common interface, List |
4 | the LUB of two identical interfaces is the interface itself |
5 | the LUB of Bottom1 and Bottom2 is their superclass Top |
6 | the LUB of two types which have nothing in common is Object |
In those examples, the LUB is always representable as a normal, JVM supported, type. But Groovy internally represents the LUB as a type which can be more complex, and that you wouldn’t be able to use to define a variable for example. To illustrate this, let’s continue with this example:
interface Foo {}
class Top {}
class Bottom extends Top implements Serializable, Foo {}
class SerializableFooImpl implements Serializable, Foo {}
What is the least upper bound of Bottom
and SerializableFooImpl
? They don’t have a common super class (apart from Object
),
but they do share 2 interfaces (Serializable
and Foo
), so their least upper bound is a type which represents the union of
two interfaces (Serializable
and Foo
). This type cannot be defined in the source code, yet Groovy knows about it.
In the context of collection type inference (and generic type inference in general), this becomes handy, because the type of the components is inferred as the least upper bound. We can illustrate why this is important in the following example:
interface Greeter { void greet() } (1)
interface Salute { void salute() } (2)
class A implements Greeter, Salute { (3)
void greet() { println "Hello, I'm A!" }
void salute() { println "Bye from A!" }
}
class B implements Greeter, Salute { (4)
void greet() { println "Hello, I'm B!" }
void salute() { println "Bye from B!" }
void exit() { println 'No way!' } (5)
}
def list = [new A(), new B()] (6)
list.each {
it.greet() (7)
it.salute() (8)
it.exit() (9)
}
1 | the Greeter interface defines a single method, greet |
2 | the Salute interface defines a single method, salute |
3 | class A implements both Greeter and Salute but there’s no explicit interface extending both |
4 | same for B |
5 | but B defines an additional exit method |
6 | the type of list is inferred as "list of the LUB of A and `B`" |
7 | so it is possible to call greet which is defined on both A and B through the Greeter interface |
8 | and it is possible to call salute which is defined on both A and B through the Salute interface |
9 | yet calling exit is a compile time error because it doesn’t belong to the LUB of A and B (only defined in B ) |
The error message will look like:
[Static type checking] - Cannot find matching method Greeter or Salute#exit()
which indicates that the exit
method is neither defines on Greeter
nor Salute
, which are the two interfaces defined
in the least upper bound of A
and B
.
In normal, non type checked, Groovy, you can write things like:
class Greeter {
String greeting() { 'Hello' }
}
void doSomething(def o) {
if (o instanceof Greeter) { (1)
println o.greeting() (2)
}
}
doSomething(new Greeter())
1 | guard the method call with an instanceof check |
2 | make the call |
The method call works because of dynamic dispatch (the method is selected at runtime). The equivalent code in Java would
require to cast o
to a Greeter
before calling the greeting
method, because methods are selected at compile time:
if (o instanceof Greeter) {
System.out.println(((Greeter)o).greeting());
}
However, in Groovy, even if you add @TypeChecked
(and thus activate type checking) on the doSomething
method, the
cast is not necessary. The compiler embeds instanceof inference that makes the cast optional.
Flow typing is an important concept of Groovy in type checked mode and an extension of type inference. The idea is that the compiler is capable of inferring the type of variables in the flow of the code, not just at initialization:
@groovy.transform.TypeChecked
void flowTyping() {
def o = 'foo' (1)
o = o.toUpperCase() (2)
o = 9d (3)
o = Math.sqrt(o) (4)
}
1 | first, o is declared using def and assigned a String |
2 | the compiler inferred that o is a String , so calling toUpperCase is allowed |
3 | o is reassigned with a double |
4 | calling Math.sqrt passes compilation because the compiler knows that at this point, o is a double |
So the type checker is aware of the fact that the concrete type of a variable is different over time. In particular, if you replace the last assignment with:
o = 9d
o = o.toUpperCase()
The type checker will now fail at compile time, because it knows that o
is a double
when toUpperCase
is called,
so it’s a type error.
It is important to understand that it is not the fact of declaring a variable with def
that triggers type inference.
Flow typing works for any variable of any type. Declaring a variable with an explicit type only constrains what you
can assign to the variable:
@groovy.transform.TypeChecked
void flowTypingWithExplicitType() {
List list = ['a','b','c'] (1)
list = list*.toUpperCase() (2)
list = 'foo' (3)
}
1 | list is declared as an unchecked List and assigned a list literal of `String`s |
2 | this line passes compilation because of flow typing: the type checker knows that list is at this point a List<String> |
3 | but you can’t assign a String to a List so this is a type checking error |
You can also note that even if the variable is declared without generics information, the type checker knows what is the component type. Therefore, such code would fail compilation:
@groovy.transform.TypeChecked
void flowTypingWithExplicitType() {
List list = ['a','b','c'] (1)
list.add(1) (2)
}
1 | list is inferred as List<String> |
2 | so adding an int to a List<String> is a compile-time error |
Fixing this requires adding an explicit generic type to the declaration:
@groovy.transform.TypeChecked
void flowTypingWithExplicitType() {
List<? extends Serializable> list = [] (1)
list.addAll(['a','b','c']) (2)
list.add(1) (3)
}
1 | list declared as List<? extends Serializable> and initialized with an empty list |
2 | elements added to the list conform to the declaration type of the list |
3 | so adding an int to a List<? extends Serializable> is allowed |
Flow typing has been introduced to reduce the difference in semantics between classic and static Groovy. In particular, consider the behavior of this code in Java:
public Integer compute(String str) {
return str.length();
}
public String compute(Object o) {
return "Nope";
}
// ...
Object string = "Some string"; (1)
Object result = compute(string); (2)
System.out.println(result); (3)
1 | o is declared as an Object and assigned a String |
2 | we call the compute method with o |
3 | and print the result |
In Java, this code will output Nope
, because method selection is done at compile time and based on the declared types.
So even if o
is a String
at runtime, it is still the Object
version which is called, because o
has been declared
as an Object
. To be short, in Java, declared types are most important, be it variable types, parameter types or return
types.
In Groovy, we could write:
int compute(String string) { string.length() }
String compute(Object o) { "Nope" }
Object o = 'string'
def result = compute(o)
println result
But this time, it will return 6
, because the method which is chosen is chosen at runtime, based on the actual
argument types. So at runtime, o
is a String
so the String
variant is used. Note that this behavior has nothing
to do with type checking, it’s the way Groovy works in general: dynamic dispatch.
In type checked Groovy, we want to make sure the type checker selects the same method at compile time, that the runtime
would choose. It is not possible in general, due to the semantics of the language, but we can make things better with flow
typing. With flow typing, o
is inferred as a String
when the compute
method is called, so the version which takes
a String
and returns an int
is chosen. This means that we can infer the return type of the method to be an int
, and
not a String
. This is important for subsequent calls and type safety.
So in type checked Groovy, flow typing is a very important concept, which also implies that if @TypeChecked
is applied,
methods are selected based on the inferred types of the arguments, not on the declared types. This doesn’t ensure 100%
type safety, because the type checker may select a wrong method, but it ensures the closest semantics to dynamic Groovy.
A combination of flow typing and least upper bound inference is used to perform advanced type inference and ensure type safety in multiple situations. In particular, program control structures are likely to alter the inferred type of a variable:
class Top {
void methodFromTop() {}
}
class Bottom extends Top {
void methodFromBottom() {}
}
def o
if (someCondition) {
o = new Top() (1)
} else {
o = new Bottom() (2)
}
o.methodFromTop() (3)
o.methodFromBottom() // compilation error (4)
1 | if someCondition is true, o is assigned a Top |
2 | if someCondition is false, o is assigned a Bottom |
3 | calling methodFromTop is safe |
4 | but calling methodFromBottom is not, so it’s a compile time error |
When the type checker visits an if/else
control structure, it checks all variables which are assigned in if/else
branches
and computes the least upper bound of all assignments. This type is the type of the inferred variable
after the if/else
block, so in this example, o
is assigned a Top
in the if
branch and a Bottom
in the else
branch. The LUB of those is a Top
, so after the conditional branches, the compiler infers o
as being
a Top
. Calling methodFromTop
will therefore be allowed, but not methodFromBottom
.
The same reasoning exists with closures and in particular closure shared variables. A closure shared variable is a variable which is defined outside of a closure, but used inside a closure, as in this example:
def text = 'Hello, world!' (1)
def closure = {
println text (2)
}
1 | a variable named text is declared |
2 | text is used from inside a closure. It is a closure shared variable. |
Groovy allows developers to use those variables without requiring them to be final. This means that a closure shared variable can be reassigned inside a closure:
String result
doSomething { String it ->
result = "Result: $it"
}
result = result?.toUpperCase()
The problem is that a closure is an independent block of code that can be executed (or not) at any time. In particular,
doSomething
may be asynchronous, for example. This means that the body of a closure doesn’t belong to the main control
flow. For that reason, the type checker also computes, for each closure shared variable, the LUB of all
assignments of the variable, and will use that LUB
as the inferred type outside of the scope of the closure, like in
this example:
class Top {
void methodFromTop() {}
}
class Bottom extends Top {
void methodFromBottom() {}
}
def o = new Top() (1)
Thread.start {
o = new Bottom() (2)
}
o.methodFromTop() (3)
o.methodFromBottom() // compilation error (4)
1 | a closure-shared variable is first assigned a Top |
2 | inside the closure, it is assigned a Bottom |
3 | methodFromTop is allowed |
4 | methodFromBottom is a compilation error |
Here, it is clear that when methodFromBottom
is called, there’s no guarantee, at compile-time or runtime that the
type of o
will effectively be a Bottom
. There are chances that it will be, but we can’t make sure, because it’s
asynchronous. So the type checker will only allow calls on the least upper bound, which is here a Top
.
Closures and type inference
The type checker performs special inference on closures, resulting on additional checks on one side and improved fluency on the other side.
The first thing that the type checker is capable of doing is inferring the return type of a closure. This is simply illustrated in the following example:
@groovy.transform.TypeChecked
int testClosureReturnTypeInference(String arg) {
def cl = { "Arg: $arg" } (1)
def val = cl() (2)
val.length() (3)
}
1 | a closure is defined, and it returns a string (more precisely a GString ) |
2 | we call the closure and assign the result to a variable |
3 | the type checker inferred that the closure would return a string, so calling length() is allowed |
As you can see, unlike a method which declares its return type explicitly, there’s no need to declare the return type of a closure: its type is inferred from the body of the closure.
In addition to the return type, it is possible for a closure to infer its parameter types from the context. There are two ways for the compiler to infer the parameter types:
-
through implicit SAM type coercion
-
through API metadata
To illustrate this, lets start with an example that will fail compilation due to the inability for the type checker to infer the parameter types:
class Person {
String name
int age
}
void inviteIf(Person p, Closure<Boolean> predicate) { (1)
if (predicate.call(p)) {
// send invite
// ...
}
}
@groovy.transform.TypeChecked
void failCompilation() {
Person p = new Person(name: 'Gerard', age: 55)
inviteIf(p) { (2)
it.age >= 18 // No such property: age (3)
}
}
1 | the inviteIf method accepts a Person and a Closure |
2 | we call it with a Person and a Closure |
3 | yet it is not statically known as being a Person and compilation fails |
In this example, the closure body contains it.age
. With dynamic, not type checked code, this would work, because the
type of it
would be a Person
at runtime. Unfortunately, at compile-time, there’s no way to know what is the type
of it
, just by reading the signature of inviteIf
.
To be short, the type checker doesn’t have enough contextual information on the inviteIf
method to determine statically
the type of it
. This means that the method call needs to be rewritten like this:
inviteIf(p) { Person it -> (1)
it.age >= 18
}
1 | the type of it needs to be declared explicitly |
By explicitly declaring the type of the it
variable, you can workaround the problem and make this code statically
checked.
For an API or framework designer, there are two ways to make this more elegant for users, so that they don’t have to declare an explicit type for the closure parameters. The first one, and easiest, is to replace the closure with a SAM type:
interface Predicate<On> { boolean apply(On e) } (1)
void inviteIf(Person p, Predicate<Person> predicate) { (2)
if (predicate.apply(p)) {
// send invite
// ...
}
}
@groovy.transform.TypeChecked
void passesCompilation() {
Person p = new Person(name: 'Gerard', age: 55)
inviteIf(p) { (3)
it.age >= 18 (4)
}
}
1 | declare a SAM interface with an apply method |
2 | inviteIf now uses a Predicate<Person> instead of a Closure<Boolean> |
3 | there’s no need to declare the type of the it variable anymore |
4 | it.age compiles properly, the type of it is inferred from the Predicate#apply method signature |
By using this technique, we leverage the automatic coercion of closures to SAM types feature of Groovy. The question whether you should use a SAM type or a Closure really depends on what you need to do. In a lot of cases, using a SAM interface is enough, especially if you consider functional interfaces as they are found in Java 8. However, closures provide features that are not accessible to functional interfaces. In particular, closures can have a delegate, and owner and can be manipulated as objects (for example, cloned, serialized, curried, …) before being called. They can also support multiple signatures (polymorphism). So if you need that kind of manipulation, it is preferable to switch to the most advanced type inference annotations which are described below. |
The original issue that needs to be solved when it comes to closure parameter type inference, that is to say, statically determining the types of the arguments of a closure without having to have them explicitly declared, is that the Groovy type system inherits the Java type system, which is insufficient to describe the types of the arguments.
@ClosureParams
annotationGroovy provides an annotation, @ClosureParams
which is aimed at completing type information. This annotation is primarily
aimed at framework and API developers who want to extend the capabilities of the type checker by providing type inference
metadata. This is important if your library makes use of closures and that you want the maximum level of tooling support
too.
Let’s illustrate this by fixing the original example, introducing the @ClosureParams
annotation:
import groovy.transform.stc.ClosureParams
import groovy.transform.stc.FirstParam
void inviteIf(Person p, @ClosureParams(FirstParam) Closure<Boolean> predicate) { (1)
if (predicate.call(p)) {
// send invite
// ...
}
}
inviteIf(p) { (2)
it.age >= 18
}
1 | the closure parameter is annotated with @ClosureParams |
2 | it’s not necessary to use an explicit type for it , which is inferred |
The @ClosureParams
annotation minimally accepts one argument, which is named a type hint. A type hint is a class which
is responsible for completing type information at compile time for the closure. In this example, the type hint being used
is groovy.transform.stc.FirstParam
which indicated to the type checker that the closure will accept one parameter
whose type is the type of the first parameter of the method. In this case, the first parameter of the method is Person
,
so it indicates to the type checker that the first parameter of the closure is in fact a Person
.
A second optional argument is named options. Its semantics depend on the type hint class. Groovy comes with various bundled type hints, illustrated in the table below:
Type hint | Polymorphic? | Description and examples |
---|---|---|
|
No |
The first (resp. second, third) parameter type of the method
|
|
No |
The first generic type of the first (resp. second, third) parameter of the method
Variants for |
|
No |
A type hint for which the type of closure parameters comes from the options string.
This type hint supports a single signature and each of the parameter is specified as a value of the options array using a fully-qualified type name or a primitive type. |
|
Yes |
A dedicated type hint for closures that either work on a
This type hint requires that the first argument is a |
|
Yes |
Infers closure parameter types from the abstract method of some type. A signature is inferred for each abstract method.
If there are multiple signatures like in the example above, the type checker will only be able to infer the types of
the arguments if the arity of each method is different. In the example above, |
|
Yes |
Infers the closure parameter types from the A single signature for a closure accepting a
A polymorphic closure, accepting either a
A polymorphic closure, accepting either a
|
Even though you use FirstParam , SecondParam or ThirdParam as a type hint, it doesn’t strictly mean that the
argument which will be passed to the closure will be the first (resp. second, third) argument of the method call. It
only means that the type of the parameter of the closure will be the same as the type of the first (resp. second,
third) argument of the method call.
|
In short, the lack of the @ClosureParams
annotation on a method accepting a Closure
will not fail compilation. If
present (and it can be present in Java sources as well as Groovy sources), then the type checker has more information
and can perform additional type inference. This makes this feature particularly interesting for framework developers.
A third optional argument is named conflictResolutionStrategy. It can reference a class (extending from
ClosureSignatureConflictResolver
) that can perform additional resolution of parameter types if more than
one are found after initial inference calculations are complete. Groovy comes with the a default type resolver
which does nothing, and another which selects the first signature if multiple are found. The resolver is
only invoked if more than one signature is found and is by design a post processor. Any statements which need
injected typing information must pass one of the parameter signatures determined through type hints. The
resolver then picks among the returned candidate signatures.
@DelegatesTo
The @DelegatesTo
annotation is used by the type checker to infer the type of the delegate. It allows the API designer
to instruct the compiler what is the type of the delegate and the delegation strategy. The @DelegatesTo
annotation is
discussed in a specific section.
Static compilation
Dynamic vs static
In the type checking section, we have seen that Groovy provides optional type checking thanks to the
@TypeChecked
annotation. The type checker runs at compile time and performs a static analysis of dynamic code. The
program will behave exactly the same whether type checking has been enabled or not. This means that the @TypeChecked
annotation is neutral with regards to the semantics of a program. Even though it may be necessary to add type information
in the sources so that the program is considered type safe, in the end, the semantics of the program are the same.
While this may sound fine, there is actually one issue with this: type checking of dynamic code, done at compile time, is by definition only correct if no runtime specific behavior occurs. For example, the following program passes type checking:
class Computer {
int compute(String str) {
str.length()
}
String compute(int x) {
String.valueOf(x)
}
}
@groovy.transform.TypeChecked
void test() {
def computer = new Computer()
computer.with {
assert compute(compute('foobar')) =='6'
}
}
There are two compute
methods. One accepts a String
and returns an int
, the other accepts an int
and returns
a String
. If you compile this, it is considered type safe: the inner compute('foobar')
call will return an int
,
and calling compute
on this int
will in turn return a String
.
Now, before calling test()
, consider adding the following line:
Computer.metaClass.compute = { String str -> new Date() }
Using runtime metaprogramming, we’re actually modifying the behavior of the compute(String)
method, so that instead of
returning the length of the provided argument, it will return a Date
. If you execute the program, it will fail at
runtime. Since this line can be added from anywhere, in any thread, there’s absolutely no way for the type checker to
statically make sure that no such thing happens. In short, the type checker is vulnerable to monkey patching. This is
just one example, but this illustrates the concept that doing static analysis of a dynamic program is inherently wrong.
The Groovy language provides an alternative annotation to @TypeChecked
which will actually make sure that the methods
which are inferred as being called will effectively be called at runtime. This annotation turns the Groovy compiler
into a static compiler, where all method calls are resolved at compile time and the generated bytecode makes sure
that this happens: the annotation is @groovy.transform.CompileStatic
.
The @CompileStatic
annotation
The @CompileStatic
annotation can be added anywhere the @TypeChecked
annotation can be used, that is to say on
a class or a method. It is not necessary to add both @TypeChecked
and @CompileStatic
, as @CompileStatic
performs
everything @TypeChecked
does, but in addition triggers static compilation.
Let’s take the example which failed, but this time let’s replace the @TypeChecked
annotation
with @CompileStatic
:
class Computer {
int compute(String str) {
str.length()
}
String compute(int x) {
String.valueOf(x)
}
}
@groovy.transform.CompileStatic
void test() {
def computer = new Computer()
computer.with {
assert compute(compute('foobar')) =='6'
}
}
Computer.metaClass.compute = { String str -> new Date() }
test()
This is the only difference. If we execute this program, this time, there is no runtime error. The test
method
became immune to monkey patching, because the compute
methods which are called in its body are linked at compile
time, so even if the metaclass of Computer
changes, the program still behaves as expected by the type checker.
Key benefits
There are several benefits of using @CompileStatic
on your code:
-
type safety
-
immunity to monkey patching
-
performance improvements
The performance improvements depend on the kind of program you are executing. If it is I/O bound, the difference between statically compiled code and dynamic code is barely noticeable. On highly CPU intensive code, since the bytecode which is generated is very close, if not equal, to the one that Java would produce for an equivalent program, the performance is greatly improved.
Using the invokedynamic version of Groovy, which is accessible to people using JDK 7 and above, the performance of the dynamic code should be very close to the performance of statically compiled code. Sometimes, it can even be faster! There is only one way to determine which version you should choose: measuring. The reason is that depending on your program and the JVM that you use, the performance can be significantly different. In particular, the invokedynamic version of Groovy is very sensitive to the JVM version in use. |
1.6.7. Type checking extensions
Writing a type checking extension
Towards a smarter type checker
Despite being a dynamic language, Groovy can be used with a static type checker at compile time, enabled using the @TypeChecked annotation. In this mode, the compiler becomes more verbose and throws errors for, example, typos, non-existent methods,… This comes with a few limitations though, most of them coming from the fact that Groovy remains inherently a dynamic language. For example, you wouldn’t be able to use type checking on code that uses the markup builder:
def builder = new MarkupBuilder(out)
builder.html {
head {
// ...
}
body {
p 'Hello, world!'
}
}
In the previous example, none of the html
, head
, body
or p
methods
exist. However if you execute the code, it works because Groovy uses dynamic dispatch
and converts those method calls at runtime. In this builder, there’s no limitation about
the number of tags that you can use, nor the attributes, which means there is no chance
for a type checker to know about all the possible methods (tags) at compile time, unless
you create a builder dedicated to HTML for example.
Groovy is a platform of choice when it comes to implement internal DSLs. The flexible syntax, combined with runtime and compile-time metaprogramming capabilities make Groovy an interesting choice because it allows the programmer to focus on the DSL rather than on tooling or implementation. Since Groovy DSLs are Groovy code, it’s easy to have IDE support without having to write a dedicated plugin for example.
In a lot of cases, DSL engines are written in Groovy (or Java) then user
code is executed as scripts, meaning that you have some kind of wrapper
on top of user logic. The wrapper may consist, for example, in a
GroovyShell
or GroovyScriptEngine
that performs some tasks transparently
before running the script (adding imports, applying AST transforms,
extending a base script,…). Often, user written scripts come to
production without testing because the DSL logic comes to a point
where any user may write code using the DSL syntax. In the end, a user
may just ignore that what they write is actually code. This adds some
challenges for the DSL implementer, such as securing execution of user
code or, in this case, early reporting of errors.
For example, imagine a DSL which goal is to drive a rover on Mars remotely. Sending a message to the rover takes around 15 minutes. If the rover executes the script and fails with an error (say a typo), you have two problems:
-
first, feedback comes only after 30 minutes (the time needed for the rover to get the script and the time needed to receive the error)
-
second, some portion of the script has been executed and you may have to change the fixed script significantly (implying that you need to know the current state of the rover…)
Type checking extensions is a mechanism that will allow the developer of a DSL engine to make those scripts safer by applying the same kind of checks that static type checking allows on regular groovy classes.
The principle, here, is to fail early, that is to say fail compilation of scripts as soon as possible, and if possible provide feedback to the user (including nice error messages).
In short, the idea behind type checking extensions is to make the compiler aware of all the runtime metaprogramming tricks that the DSL uses, so that scripts can benefit the same level of compile-time checks as a verbose statically compiled code would have. We will see that you can go even further by performing checks that a normal type checker wouldn’t do, delivering powerful compile-time checks for your users.
The extensions attribute
The @TypeChecked
annotation supports an attribute
named extensions
. This parameter takes an array of strings
corresponding to a list of type checking extensions scripts. Those
scripts are found at compile time on classpath. For example, you would
write:
@TypeChecked(extensions='/path/to/myextension.groovy')
void foo() { ...}
In that case, the foo methods would be type checked with the rules of the normal type checker completed by those found in the myextension.groovy script. Note that while internally the type checker supports multiple mechanisms to implement type checking extensions (including plain old java code), the recommended way is to use those type checking extension scripts.
A DSL for type checking
The idea behind type checking extensions is to use a DSL to extend the type checker capabilities. This DSL allows you to hook into the compilation process, more specifically the type checking phase, using an "event-driven" API. For example, when the type checker enters a method body, it throws a beforeVisitMethod event that the extension can react to:
beforeVisitMethod { methodNode ->
println "Entering ${methodNode.name}"
}
Imagine that you have this rover DSL at hand. A user would write:
robot.move 100
If you have a class defined as such:
class Robot {
Robot move(int qt) { this }
}
The script can be type checked before being executed using the following script:
def config = new CompilerConfiguration()
config.addCompilationCustomizers(
new ASTTransformationCustomizer(TypeChecked) (1)
)
def shell = new GroovyShell(config) (2)
def robot = new Robot()
shell.setVariable('robot', robot)
shell.evaluate(script) (3)
1 | a compiler configuration adds the @TypeChecked annotation to all classes |
2 | use the configuration in a GroovyShell |
3 | so that scripts compiled using the shell are compiled with @TypeChecked without the user having to add it explicitly |
Using the compiler configuration above, we can apply @TypeChecked transparently to the script. In that case, it will fail at compile time:
[Static type checking] - The variable [robot] is undeclared.
Now, we will slightly update the configuration to include the ``extensions'' parameter:
config.addCompilationCustomizers(
new ASTTransformationCustomizer(
TypeChecked,
extensions:['robotextension.groovy'])
)
Then add the following to your classpath:
unresolvedVariable { var ->
if ('robot'==var.name) {
storeType(var, classNodeFor(Robot))
handled = true
}
}
Here, we’re telling the compiler that if an unresolved variable is found
and that the name of the variable is robot, then we can make sure that the type of this
variable is Robot
.
Type checking extensions API
The type checking API is a low level API, dealing with the Abstract Syntax Tree. You will have to know your AST well to develop extensions, even if the DSL makes it much easier than just dealing with AST code from plain Java or Groovy.
The type checker sends the following events, to which an extension script can react:
Event name |
setup |
Called When |
Called after the type checker finished initialization |
Arguments |
none |
Usage |
Can be used to perform setup of your extension |
Event name |
finish |
Called When |
Called after the type checker completed type checking |
Arguments |
none |
Usage |
Can be used to perform additional checks after the type checker has finished its job. |
Event name |
unresolvedVariable |
Called When |
Called when the type checker finds an unresolved variable |
Arguments |
VariableExpression var |
Usage |
Allows the developer to help the type checker with user-injected variables. |
Event name |
unresolvedProperty |
Called When |
Called when the type checker cannot find a property on the receiver |
Arguments |
PropertyExpression pexp |
Usage |
Allows the developer to handle "dynamic" properties |
Event name |
unresolvedAttribute |
Called When |
Called when the type checker cannot find an attribute on the receiver |
Arguments |
AttributeExpression aex |
Usage |
Allows the developer to handle missing attributes |
Event name |
beforeMethodCall |
Called When |
Called before the type checker starts type checking a method call |
Arguments |
MethodCall call |
Usage |
Allows you to intercept method calls before the type checker performs its own checks. This is useful if you want to replace the default type checking with a custom one for a limited scope. In that case, you must set the handled flag to true, so that the type checker skips its own checks. |
Event name |
afterMethodCall |
Called When |
Called once the type checker has finished type checking a method call |
Arguments |
MethodCall call |
Usage |
Allow you to perform additional checks after the type
checker has done its own checks. This is in particular useful if you
want to perform the standard type checking tests but also want to ensure
additional type safety, for example checking the arguments against each
other.Note that |
Event name |
onMethodSelection |
Called When |
Called by the type checker when it finds a method appropriate for a method call |
Arguments |
Expression expr, MethodNode node |
Usage |
The type checker works by inferring argument types of a method call, then chooses a target method. If it finds one that corresponds, then it triggers this event. It is for example interesting if you want to react on a specific method call, such as entering the scope of a method that takes a closure as argument (as in builders).Please note that this event may be thrown for various types of expressions, not only method calls (binary expressions for example). |
Event name |
methodNotFound |
Called When |
Called by the type checker when it fails to find an appropriate method for a method call |
Arguments |
ClassNode receiver, String name, ArgumentListExpression argList, ClassNode[] argTypes,MethodCall call |
Usage |
Unlike |
Event name |
beforeVisitMethod |
Called When |
Called by the type checker before type checking a method body |
Arguments |
MethodNode node |
Usage |
The type checker will call this method before starting to type check a method body. If you want, for example, to perform type checking by yourself instead of letting the type checker do it, you have to set the handled flag to true.This event can also be used to help defining the scope of your extension (for example, applying it only if you are inside method foo). |
Event name |
afterVisitMethod |
Called When |
Called by the type checker after type checking a method body |
Arguments |
MethodNode node |
Usage |
Gives you the opportunity to perform additional checks after a method body is visited by the type checker. This is useful if you collect information, for example, and want to perform additional checks once everything has been collected. |
Event name |
beforeVisitClass |
Called When |
Called by the type checker before type checking a class |
Arguments |
ClassNode node |
Usage |
If a class is type checked, then
before visiting the class, this event will be sent. It is also the case
for inner classes defined inside a class annotated with |
Event name |
afterVisitClass |
Called When |
Called by the type checker after having finished the visit of a type checked class |
Arguments |
ClassNode node |
Usage |
Called
for every class being type checked after the type checker finished its
work. This includes classes annotated with |
Event name |
incompatibleAssignment |
Called When |
Called when the type checker thinks that an assignment is incorrect, meaning that the right hand side of an assignment is incompatible with the left hand side |
Arguments |
ClassNode lhsType, ClassNode rhsType, Expression assignment |
Usage |
Gives the
developer the ability to handle incorrect assignments. This is for
example useful if a class overrides |
Event name |
ambiguousMethods |
Called When |
Called when the type checker cannot choose between several candidate methods |
Arguments |
List<MethodNode> methods, Expression origin |
Usage |
Gives the
developer the ability to handle incorrect assignments. This is for
example useful if a class overrides |
Of course, an extension script may consist of several blocks, and you can have multiple blocks responding to the same event. This makes the DSL look nicer and easier to write. However, reacting to events is far from sufficient. If you know you can react to events, you also need to deal with the errors, which implies several helper methods that will make things easier.
Working with extensions
The DSL relies on a support class called org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.GroovyTypeCheckingExtensionSupport . This class itself extends org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.TypeCheckingExtension . Those two classes define a number of helper methods that will make working with the AST easier, especially regarding type checking. One interesting thing to know is that you have access to the type checker. This means that you can programmatically call methods of the type checker, including those that allow you to throw compilation errors.
The extension script delegates to the org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.GroovyTypeCheckingExtensionSupport class, meaning that you have direct access to the following variables:
-
context: the type checker context, of type org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.TypeCheckingContext
-
typeCheckingVisitor: the type checker itself, a org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor instance
-
generatedMethods: a list of "generated methods", which is in fact the list of "dummy" methods that you can create inside a type checking extension using the
newMethod
calls
The type checking context contains a lot of information that is useful in context for the type checker. For example, the current stack of enclosing method calls, binary expressions, closures, … This information is in particular important if you have to know where you are when an error occurs and that you want to handle it.
Handling class nodes is something that needs particular attention when
you work with a type checking extension. Compilation works with an
abstract syntax tree (AST) and the tree may not be complete when you are
type checking a class. This also means that when you refer to types, you
must not use class literals such as String
or HashSet
, but to class
nodes representing those types. This requires a certain level of
abstraction and understanding how Groovy deals with class nodes. To make
things easier, Groovy supplies several helper methods to deal with class
nodes. For example, if you want to say "the type for String", you can
write:
assert classNodeFor(String) instanceof ClassNode
You would also note that there is a variant of classNodeFor that takes
a String
as an argument, instead of a Class
. In general, you
should not use that one, because it would create a class node for
which the name is String
, but without any method, any property, …
defined on it. The first version returns a class node that is resolved
but the second one returns one that is not. So the latter should be
reserved for very special cases.
The second problem that you might encounter is referencing a type which
is not yet compiled. This may happen more often than you think. For
example, when you compile a set of files together. In that case, if you
want to say "that variable is of type Foo" but Foo
is not yet
compiled, you can still refer to the Foo
class node
using lookupClassNodeFor
:
assert lookupClassNodeFor('Foo') instanceof ClassNode
Say that you know that variable foo
is of type Foo
and you want to
tell the type checker about it. Then you can use the storeType
method,
which takes two arguments: the first one is the node for which you want
to store the type and the second one is the type of the node. If you
look at the implementation of storeType
, you would see that it
delegates to the type checker equivalent method, which itself does a lot
of work to store node metadata. You would also see that storing the type
is not limited to variables: you can set the type of any expression.
Likewise, getting the type of an AST node is just a matter of
calling getType
on that node. This would in general be what you want,
but there’s something that you must understand:
-
getType
returns the inferred type of an expression. This means that it will not return, for a variable declared of typeObject
the class node forObject
, but the inferred type of this variable at this point of the code (flow typing) -
if you want to access the origin type of a variable (or field/parameter), then you must call the appropriate method on the AST node
To throw a type checking error, you only have to call the
addStaticTypeError
method which takes two arguments:
-
a message which is a string that will be displayed to the end user
-
an AST node responsible for the error. It’s better to provide the best suiting AST node because it will be used to retrieve the line and column numbers
It is often required to know the type of an AST node. For readability,
the DSL provides a special isXXXExpression method that will delegate to
x instance of XXXExpression
. For example, instead of writing:
if (node instanceof BinaryExpression) {
...
}
which requires you to import the BinaryExpression
class, you can just
write:
if (isBinaryExpression(node)) {
...
}
When you perform type checking of dynamic code, you may often face the case when you know that a method call is valid but there is no "real" method behind it. As an example, take the Grails dynamic finders. You can have a method call consisting of a method named findByName(…). As there’s no findByName method defined in the bean, the type checker would complain. Yet, you would know that this method wouldn’t fail at runtime, and you can even tell what is the return type of this method. For this case, the DSL supports two special constructs that consist of phantom methods. This means that you will return a method node that doesn’t really exist but is defined in the context of type checking. Three methods exist:
-
newMethod(String name, Class returnType)
-
newMethod(String name, ClassNode returnType)
-
newMethod(String name, Callable<ClassNode> return Type)
All three variants do the same: they create a new method node which name
is the supplied name and define the return type of this method.
Moreover, the type checker would add those methods in
the generatedMethods
list (see isGenerated
below). The reason why we
only set a name and a return type is that it is only what you need in
90% of the cases. For example, in the findByName
example upper, the
only thing you need to know is that findByName
wouldn’t fail at
runtime, and that it returns a domain class. The Callable
version of
return type is interesting because it defers the computation of the
return type when the type checker actually needs it. This is interesting
because in some circumstances, you may not know the actual return type
when the type checker demands it, so you can use a closure that will be
called each time getReturnType
is called by the type checker on this
method node. If you combine this with deferred checks, you can achieve
pretty complex type checking including handling of forward references.
newMethod(name) {
// each time getReturnType on this method node will be called, this closure will be called!
println 'Type checker called me!'
lookupClassNodeFor(Foo) // return type
}
Should you need more than the name and return type, you can always
create a new MethodNode
by yourself.
Scoping is very important in DSL type checking and is one of the reasons why we couldn’t use a pointcut based approach to DSL type checking. Basically, you must be able to define very precisely when your extension applies and when it does not. Moreover, you must be able to handle situations that a regular type checker would not be able to handle, such as forward references:
point a(1,1)
line a,b // b is referenced afterwards!
point b(5,2)
Say for example that you want to handle a builder:
builder.foo {
bar
baz(bar)
}
Your extension, then, should only be active once you’ve entered
the foo
method, and inactive outside of this scope. But you could have
complex situations like multiple builders in the same file or embedded
builders (builders in builders). While you should not try to fix all
this from start (you must accept limitations to type checking), the type
checker does offer a nice mechanism to handle this: a scoping stack,
using the newScope
and scopeExit
methods.
-
newScope
creates a new scope and puts it on top of the stack -
scopeExits
pops a scope from the stack
A scope consists of:
-
a parent scope
-
a map of custom data
If you want to look at the implementation, it’s simply a LinkedHashMap
(org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.GroovyTypeCheckingExtensionSupport.TypeCheckingScope),
but it’s quite powerful. For example, you can use such a scope to store
a list of closures to be executed when you exit the scope. This is how
you would handle forward references:
def scope = newScope()
scope.secondPassChecks = []
//...
scope.secondPassChecks << { println 'executed later' }
// ...
scopeExit {
secondPassChecks*.run() // execute deferred checks
}
That is to say, that if at some point you are not able to determine the
type of an expression, or that you are not able to check at this point
that an assignment is valid or not, you can still make the check later…
This is a very powerful feature. Now, newScope
and scopeExit
provide some interesting syntactic sugar:
newScope {
secondPassChecks = []
}
At anytime in the DSL, you can access the current scope
using getCurrentScope()
or more simply currentScope
:
//...
currentScope.secondPassChecks << { println 'executed later' }
// ...
The general schema would then be:
-
determine a pointcut where you push a new scope on stack and initialize custom variables within this scope
-
using the various events, you can use the information stored in your custom scope to perform checks, defer checks,…
-
determine a pointcut where you exit the scope, call
scopeExit
and eventually perform additional checks
For the complete list of helper methods, please refer to the org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.GroovyTypeCheckingExtensionSupport and org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.TypeCheckingExtension classes. However, take special attention to those methods:
-
isDynamic
: takes a VariableExpression as argument and returns true if the variable is a DynamicExpression, which means, in a script, that it wasn’t defined using a type ordef
. -
isGenerated
: takes a MethodNode as an argument and tells if the method is one that was generated by the type checker extension using thenewMethod
method -
isAnnotatedBy
: takes an AST node and a Class (or ClassNode), and tells if the node is annotated with this class. For example:isAnnotatedBy(node, NotNull)
-
getTargetMethod
: takes a method call as argument and returns theMethodNode
that the type checker has determined for it -
delegatesTo
: emulates the behaviour of the@DelegatesTo
annotation. It allows you to tell that the argument will delegate to a specific type (you can also specify the delegation strategy)
Advanced type checking extensions
Precompiled type checking extensions
All the examples above use type checking scripts. They are found in source form in classpath, meaning that:
-
a Groovy source file, corresponding to the type checking extension, is available on compilation classpath
-
this file is compiled by the Groovy compiler for each source unit being compiled (often, a source unit corresponds to a single file)
It is a very convenient way to develop type checking extensions, however it implies a slower compilation phase, because of the compilation of the extension itself for each file being compiled. For those reasons, it can be practical to rely on a precompiled extension. You have two options to do this:
-
write the extension in Groovy, compile it, then use a reference to the extension class instead of the source
-
write the extension in Java, compile it, then use a reference to the extension class
Writing a type checking extension in Groovy is the easiest path. Basically, the idea is that the type checking extension script becomes the body of the main method of a type checking extension class, as illustrated here:
import org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.GroovyTypeCheckingExtensionSupport
class PrecompiledExtension extends GroovyTypeCheckingExtensionSupport.TypeCheckingDSL { (1)
@Override
Object run() { (2)
unresolvedVariable { var ->
if ('robot'==var.name) {
storeType(var, classNodeFor(Robot)) (3)
handled = true
}
}
}
}
1 | extending the TypeCheckingDSL class is the easiest |
2 | then the extension code needs to go inside the run method |
3 | and you can use the very same events as an extension written in source form |
Setting up the extension is very similar to using a source form extension:
config.addCompilationCustomizers(
new ASTTransformationCustomizer(
TypeChecked,
extensions:['typing.PrecompiledExtension'])
)
The difference is that instead of using a path in classpath, you just specify the fully qualified class name of the precompiled extension.
In case you really want to write an extension in Java, then you will not benefit from the type checking extension DSL. The extension above can be rewritten in Java this way:
import org.codehaus.groovy.ast.ClassHelper;
import org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.VariableExpression;
import org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.AbstractTypeCheckingExtension;
import org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor;
public class PrecompiledJavaExtension extends AbstractTypeCheckingExtension { (1)
public PrecompiledJavaExtension(final StaticTypeCheckingVisitor typeCheckingVisitor) {
super(typeCheckingVisitor);
}
@Override
public boolean handleUnresolvedVariableExpression(final VariableExpression vexp) { (2)
if ("robot".equals(vexp.getName())) {
storeType(vexp, ClassHelper.make(Robot.class));
setHandled(true);
return true;
}
return false;
}
}
1 | extend the AbstractTypeCheckingExtension class |
2 | then override the handleXXX methods as required |
Using @Grab in a type checking extension
It is totally possible to use the @Grab
annotation in a type checking extension.
This means you can include libraries that would only be
available at compile time. In that case, you must understand that you
would increase the time of compilation significantly (at least, the
first time it grabs the dependencies).
Sharing or packaging type checking extensions
A type checking extension is just a script that need to be on classpath. As such, you can share it as is, or bundle it in a jar file that would be added to classpath.
Global type checking extensions
While you can configure the compiler to transparently add type checking extensions to your script, there is currently no way to apply an extension transparently just by having it on classpath.
Type checking extensions and @CompileStatic
Type checking extensions are used with @TypeChecked
but can also be used with @CompileStatic
. However, you must
be aware that:
-
a type checking extension used with
@CompileStatic
will in general not be sufficient to let the compiler know how to generate statically compilable code from "unsafe" code -
it is possible to use a type checking extension with
@CompileStatic
just to enhance type checking, that is to say introduce more compilation errors, without actually dealing with dynamic code
Let’s explain the first point, which is that even if you use an extension, the compiler will not know how to compile
your code statically: technically, even if you tell the type checker what is the type of a dynamic
variable, for example, it would not know how to compile it. Is it getBinding('foo')
, getProperty('foo')
,
delegate.getFoo()
,…? There’s absolutely no direct way to tell the static compiler how to compile such
code even if you use a type checking extension (that would, again, only give hints about the type).
One possible solution for this particular example is to instruct the compiler to use mixed mode compilation. The more advanced one is to use AST transformations during type checking but it is far more complex.
Type checking extensions allow you to help the type checker where it
fails, but it also allow you to fail where it doesn’t. In that context,
it makes sense to support extensions for @CompileStatic
too. Imagine
an extension that is capable of type checking SQL queries. In that case,
the extension would be valid in both dynamic and static context, because
without the extension, the code would still pass.
Mixed mode compilation
In the previous section, we highlighted the fact that you can activate type checking extensions with
@CompileStatic
. In that context, the type checker would not complain anymore about some unresolved variables or
unknown method calls, but it would still wouldn’t know how to compile them statically.
Mixed mode compilation offers a third way, which is to instruct the compiler that whenever an unresolved variable
or method call is found, then it should fall back to a dynamic mode. This is possible thanks to type checking extensions
and a special makeDynamic
call.
To illustrate this, let’s come back to the Robot
example:
robot.move 100
And let’s try to activate our type checking extension using @CompileStatic
instead of @TypeChecked
:
def config = new CompilerConfiguration()
config.addCompilationCustomizers(
new ASTTransformationCustomizer(
CompileStatic, (1)
extensions:['robotextension.groovy']) (2)
)
def shell = new GroovyShell(config)
def robot = new Robot()
shell.setVariable('robot', robot)
shell.evaluate(script)
1 | Apply @CompileStatic transparently |
2 | Activate the type checking extension |
The script will run fine because the static compiler is told about the type of the robot
variable, so it is capable
of making a direct call to move
. But before that, how did the compiler know how to get the robot
variable? In fact
by default, in a type checking extension, setting handled=true
on an unresolved variable will automatically trigger
a dynamic resolution, so in this case you don’t have anything special to make the compiler use a mixed mode. However,
let’s slightly update our example, starting from the robot script:
move 100
Here you can notice that there is no reference to robot
anymore. Our extension will not help then because we will not
be able to instruct the compiler that move
is done on a Robot
instance. This example of code can be executed in a
totally dynamic way thanks to the help of a groovy.util.DelegatingScript:
def config = new CompilerConfiguration()
config.scriptBaseClass = 'groovy.util.DelegatingScript' (1)
def shell = new GroovyShell(config)
def runner = shell.parse(script) (2)
runner.setDelegate(new Robot()) (3)
runner.run() (4)
1 | we configure the compiler to use a DelegatingScript as the base class |
2 | the script source needs to be parsed and will return an instance of DelegatingScript |
3 | we can then call setDelegate to use a Robot as the delegate of the script |
4 | then execute the script. move will be directly executed on the delegate |
If we want this to pass with @CompileStatic
, we have to use a type checking extension, so let’s update our configuration:
config.addCompilationCustomizers(
new ASTTransformationCustomizer(
CompileStatic, (1)
extensions:['robotextension2.groovy']) (2)
)
1 | apply @CompileStatic transparently |
2 | use an alternate type checking extension meant to recognize the call to move |
Then in the previous section we have learnt how to deal with unrecognized method calls, so we are able to write this extension:
methodNotFound { receiver, name, argList, argTypes, call ->
if (isMethodCallExpression(call) (1)
&& call.implicitThis (2)
&& 'move'==name (3)
&& argTypes.length==1 (4)
&& argTypes[0] == classNodeFor(int) (5)
) {
handled = true (6)
newMethod('move', classNodeFor(Robot)) (7)
}
}
1 | if the call is a method call (not a static method call) |
2 | that this call is made on "implicit this" (no explicit this. ) |
3 | that the method being called is move |
4 | and that the call is done with a single argument |
5 | and that argument is of type int |
6 | then tell the type checker that the call is valid |
7 | and that the return type of the call is Robot |
If you try to execute this code, then you could be surprised that it actually fails at runtime:
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: java.lang.Object.move()Ltyping/Robot;
The reason is very simple: while the type checking extension is sufficient for @TypeChecked
, which does not involve
static compilation, it is not enough for @CompileStatic
which requires additional information. In this case, you told
the compiler that the method existed, but you didn’t explain to it what method it is in reality, and what is the
receiver of the message (the delegate).
Fixing this is very easy and just implies replacing the newMethod
call with something else:
methodNotFound { receiver, name, argList, argTypes, call ->
if (isMethodCallExpression(call)
&& call.implicitThis
&& 'move'==name
&& argTypes.length==1
&& argTypes[0] == classNodeFor(int)
) {
makeDynamic(call, classNodeFor(Robot)) (1)
}
}
1 | tell the compiler that the call should be make dynamic |
The makeDynamic
call does 3 things:
-
it returns a virtual method just like
newMethod
-
automatically sets the
handled
flag totrue
for you -
but also marks the
call
to be done dynamically
So when the compiler will have to generate bytecode for the call to move
, since it is now marked as a dynamic call,
it will fallback to the dynamic compiler and let it handle the call. And since the extension tells us that the return
type of the dynamic call is a Robot
, subsequent calls will be done statically!
Some would wonder why the static compiler doesn’t do this by default without an extension. It is a design decision:
-
if the code is statically compiled, we normally want type safety and best performance
-
so if unrecognized variables/method calls are made dynamic, you loose type safety, but also all support for typos at compile time!
In short, if you want to have mixed mode compilation, it has to be explicit, through a type checking extension, so that the compiler, and the designer of the DSL, are totally aware of what they are doing.
makeDynamic
can be used on 3 kind of AST nodes:
-
a method node (
MethodNode
) -
a variable (
VariableExpression
) -
a property expression (
PropertyExpression
)
If that is not enough, then it means that static compilation cannot be done directly and that you have to rely on AST transformations.
Transforming the AST in an extension
Type checking extensions look very attractive from an AST transformation design point of view: extensions have access to context like inferred types, which is often nice to have. And an extension has a direct access to the abstract syntax tree. Since you have access to the AST, there is nothing in theory that prevents you from modifying the AST. However, we do not recommend you to do so, unless you are an advanced AST transformation designer and well aware of the compiler internals:
-
First of all, you would explicitly break the contract of type checking, which is to annotate, and only annotate the AST. Type checking should not modify the AST tree because you wouldn’t be able to guarantee anymore that code without the @TypeChecked annotation behaves the same without the annotation.
-
If your extension is meant to work with @CompileStatic, then you can modify the AST because this is indeed what @CompileStatic will eventually do. Static compilation doesn’t guarantee the same semantics at dynamic Groovy so there is effectively a difference between code compiled with @CompileStatic and code compiled with @TypeChecked. It’s up to you to choose whatever strategy you want to update the AST, but probably using an AST transformation that runs before type checking is easier.
-
if you cannot rely on a transformation that kicks in before the type checker, then you must be very careful
The type checking phase is the last phase running in the compiler before bytecode generation. All other AST transformations run before that and the compiler does a very good job at "fixing" incorrect AST generated before the type checking phase. As soon as you perform a transformation during type checking, for example directly in a type checking extension, then you have to do all this work of generating a 100% compiler compliant abstract syntax tree by yourself, which can easily become complex. That’s why we do not recommend to go that way if you are beginning with type checking extensions and AST transformations. |
Examples
Examples of real life type checking extensions are easy to find. You can download the source code for Groovy and take a look at the TypeCheckingExtensionsTest class which is linked to various extension scripts.
An example of a complex type checking extension can be found in the Markup Template Engine source code: this template engine relies on a type checking extension and AST transformations to transform templates into fully statically compiled code. Sources for this can be found here.
2. Tools
2.1. Running Groovy from the commandline
2.1.1. groovy, the Groovy command
groovy
invokes the Groovy command line processor. It allows you to run inline Groovy expressions, and scripts, tests or application within groovy files.
It plays a similar role to java
in the Java world but handles inline scripts and rather than invoking class files, it is normally called with scripts
and will automatically call the Groovy compiler as needed.
The easiest way to run a Groovy script, test or application is to run the following command at your shell prompt:
> groovy MyScript.groovy
The .groovy
part is optional. The groovy
command supports a number of command line switches:
Short version | Long version | Description | Example |
---|---|---|---|
-pr |
--enable-preview |
Enable preview Java features (JEP 12) (jdk12+ only). |
groovy --enable-preview Person.groovy |
-a |
--autosplit <splitPattern> |
split lines using splitPattern (default '\s') using implicit 'split' variable |
|
-b |
--basescript <class> |
Base class name for scripts (must derive from Script) |
|
-c |
--encoding <charset> |
specify the encoding of the files |
|
-cp <path> |
-classpath <path> |
Specify the compilation classpath. Must be the first argument. |
groovy -cp lib/dep.jar MyScript |
--configscript <path> |
Advanced compiler configuration script |
groovy --configscript config/config.groovy src/Person.groovy |
|
-D |
--define <name=value> |
define a system property |
|
-d |
--debug |
debug mode will print out full stack traces |
|
--disableopt <optlist> |
disables one or all optimization elements. |
||
-e <script> |
specify an inline command line script |
groovy -e "println new Date()" |
|
-h |
--help |
Displays usage information for the command line groovy command |
groovy --help |
-i <extension> |
modify files in place; create backup if extension is given (e.g. '.bak') |
||
--indy |
Enables invokedynamic support. Requires Java 7+ |
groovy --indy Person.groovy |
|
-l <port> |
listen on a port and process inbound lines (default: 1960) |
||
-n |
process files line by line using implicit 'line' variable |
||
-p |
process files line by line and print result (see also -n) |
||
-v |
--version |
display the Groovy and JVM versions |
groovy -v |
-pa |
--parameters |
Generates metadata for reflection on method parameter names on JDK 8 and above. Defaults to false. |
groovy --parameters Person.groovy |
2.2. Compiling Groovy
2.2.1. groovyc, the Groovy compiler
groovyc
is the Groovy compiler command line tool. It allows you to compile Groovy sources into bytecode. It plays
the same role as javac
in the Java world. The easiest way to compile a Groovy script or class is to run the following command:
groovyc MyClass.groovy
This will produce a MyClass.class
file (as well as other .class files depending on the contents of the source). groovyc
supports
a number of command line switches:
Short version | Long version | Description | Example |
---|---|---|---|
@argfile |
Read options and source files from specified file. |
groovyc @conf/args |
|
-cp |
-classpath, --classpath |
Specify the compilation classpath. Must be the first argument. |
groovyc -cp lib/dep.jar MyClass.groovy |
--sourcepath |
Directory where to find source files. Not used anymore. Specifying this parameter will have no effect. |
||
--temp |
Temporary directory for the compiler |
||
--encoding |
Encoding of the source files |
groovyc --encoding utf-8 script.groovy |
|
--help |
Displays help for the command line groovyc tool |
groovyc --help |
|
-d |
Specify where to place generated class files. |
groovyc -d target Person.groovy |
|
-v |
--version |
Displays the compiler version |
groovyc -v |
-e |
--exception |
Displays the stack trace in case of compilation error |
groovyc -e script.groovy |
-j |
--jointCompilation* |
Enables joint compilation |
groovyc -j A.groovy B.java |
-b |
--basescript |
Base class name for scripts (must derive from Script) |
|
-indy |
--indy |
Enables invokedynamic support. Requires Java 7+ |
groovyc --indy Person.groovy |
--configscript |
Advanced compiler configuration script |
groovyc --configscript config/config.groovy src/Person.groovy |
|
-Jproperty=value |
Properties to be passed to |
groovyc -j -Jtarget=1.6 -Jsource=1.6 A.groovy B.java |
|
-Fflag |
Flags to be passed to |
groovyc -j -Fnowarn A.groovy B.java |
|
-pa |
--parameters |
Generates metadata for reflection on method parameter names. Requires Java 8+. |
groovyc --parameters Person.groovy |
-pr |
--enable-preview |
Enable preview Java features (JEP 12) (jdk12+ only). |
groovy --enable-preview Person.groovy |
Notes: * for a full description of joint compilation, see the joint compilation section.
2.2.2. Ant task
See the groovyc Ant task documentation. It allows the Groovy compiler to be invoked from Apache Ant.
2.2.3. Gant
Gant is a tool for scripting Ant tasks using Groovy instead of XML to specify the logic. As such, it has exactly the same features as the Groovyc Ant task.
2.2.5. Maven integration
There are several approaches to compiling Groovy code in your Maven projects. GMavenPlus is the most flexible and feature rich, but like most Groovy compiler tools, it can have difficulties with joint Java-Groovy projects (for the same reason GMaven and Gradle can have issues). The Groovy-Eclipse compiler plugin for Maven sidesteps the joint compilation issues. Read this for a deeper discussion of the benefits and disadvantages of the two approaches.
A third approach is to use Maven’s Ant plugin to compile a groovy project. Note that the Ant plugin is bound to the compile and test-compile phases of the build in the example below. It will be invoked during these phases and the contained tasks will be carried out which runs the Groovy compiler over the source and test directories. The resulting Java classes will coexist with and be treated like any standard Java classes compiled from Java source and will appear no different to the JRE, or the JUnit runtime.
<project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 http://maven.apache.org/maven-v4_0_0.xsd">
<modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
<groupId>com.mycomp.MyGroovy</groupId>
<artifactId>MyGroovy</artifactId>
<packaging>jar</packaging>
<version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
<name>Maven Example building a Groovy project</name>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>junit</groupId>
<artifactId>junit</artifactId>
<version>3.8.1</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.codehaus.groovy</groupId>
<artifactId>groovy-all</artifactId>
<version>2.5.0</version>
<type>pom</type> <!-- required JUST since Groovy 2.5.0 -->
</dependency>
</dependencies>
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<artifactId>maven-antrun-plugin</artifactId>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>compile</id>
<phase>compile</phase>
<configuration>
<tasks>
<mkdir dir="${basedir}/src/main/groovy"/>
<taskdef name="groovyc"
classname="org.codehaus.groovy.ant.Groovyc">
<classpath refid="maven.compile.classpath"/>
</taskdef>
<mkdir dir="${project.build.outputDirectory}"/>
<groovyc destdir="${project.build.outputDirectory}"
srcdir="${basedir}/src/main/groovy/" listfiles="true">
<classpath refid="maven.compile.classpath"/>
</groovyc>
</tasks>
</configuration>
<goals>
<goal>run</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>test-compile</id>
<phase>test-compile</phase>
<configuration>
<tasks>
<mkdir dir="${basedir}/src/test/groovy"/>
<taskdef name="groovyc"
classname="org.codehaus.groovy.ant.Groovyc">
<classpath refid="maven.test.classpath"/>
</taskdef>
<mkdir dir="${project.build.testOutputDirectory}"/>
<groovyc destdir="${project.build.testOutputDirectory}"
srcdir="${basedir}/src/test/groovy/" listfiles="true">
<classpath refid="maven.test.classpath"/>
</groovyc>
</tasks>
</configuration>
<goals>
<goal>run</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
</project>
This assumes you have a Maven project setup with groovy
subfolders
as peers to the java src and test subfolders. You can use the java
/jar
archetype to set this up then rename the java folders to groovy or keep
the java folders and just create groovy peer folders. There exists, also
a groovy plugin which has not been tested or used in production. After
defining the build section as in the above example, you can invoke the
typical Maven build phases normally. For example, mvn test
will
execute the test phase, compiling Groovy source and Groovy test source
and finally executing the unit tests. If you run mvn jar
it will
execute the jar phase bundling up all of your compiled production
classes into a jar after all of the unit tests pass. For more detail on
Maven build phases consult the Maven2 documentation.
GMaven and GMavenPlus
GMaven
GMaven is the original Maven plugin for Groovy, supporting both compiling and scripting Groovy.
Important:
You should be aware that GMaven is not supported anymore and can have difficulties with joint compilation. GMavenPlus can be a good replacement, but if you are having problems with joint compilation, you might consider the Groovy Eclipse maven plugin.
GMavenPlus
GMavenPlus is a rewrite of GMaven and is in active development. It supports most of the features of GMaven (a couple notable exceptions being mojo Javadoc tags and support for older Groovy versions). Its joint compilation uses stubs (which means it has the same potential issues as GMaven and Gradle). The main advantages over its predecessor are that it supports recent Groovy versions, InvokeDynamic, Groovy on Android, GroovyDoc, and configuration scripts.
The Groovy Eclipse Maven plugin
Groovy-Eclipse provides a compiler plugin for Maven. Using the compiler plugin, it is possible to compile your maven projects using the Groovy-Eclipse compiler. One feature unavailable elsewhere is stubless joint compilation.
2.2.6. Joint compilation
Joint compilation means that the Groovy compiler will parse the Groovy source files, create stubs for all of them, invoke the Java compiler to compile the stubs along with Java sources, and then continue compilation in the normal Groovy compiler way. This allows mixing of Java and Groovy files without constraint.
Joint compilation can be enabled using the -j
flag with the command-line compiler,
or using using a nested tag and all the attributes and further nested tags as required
for the Ant task.
It is important to know that if you don’t enable joint compilation and try to compile Java source files with the Groovy compiler, the Java source files will be compiled as if they were Groovy sources. In some situations, this might work since most of the Java syntax is compatible with Groovy, but there are a number of places where semantics could be different.
2.2.7. Android support
It is possible to write an Android application in Groovy. However this requires a special
version of the compiler, meaning that you cannot use the regular
groovyc tool to target Android bytecode. In particular, Groovy
provides specific JAR files for Android, which have a classifier of grooid
. In order to make
things easier, a Gradle plugin adds
support for the Groovy language in the Android Gradle toolchain.
The plugin can be applied like this:
buildscript {
repositories {
jcenter()
}
dependencies {
classpath 'com.android.tools.build:gradle:2.1.2'
classpath 'org.codehaus.groovy:groovy-android-gradle-plugin:1.0.0'
}
}
apply plugin: 'groovyx.android'
Then you will need to add a dependency on the grooid
version of the Groovy compiler:
dependencies {
compile 'org.codehaus.groovy:groovy:2.4.7:grooid'
}
Note that if a Groovy jar does not provide a grooid
classifier alternative, then it means
that the jar is directly compatible with Android. In that case, you can add the dependency directly
like this:
dependencies {
compile 'org.codehaus.groovy:groovy:2.4.7:grooid' // requires the grooid classifier
compile ('org.codehaus.groovy:groovy-json:2.4.7') { // no grooid version available
transitive = false // so do not depend on non-grooid version
}
}
Note that the transitive=false
parameter for groovy-json
will let Gradle download the JSON support jar
without adding a dependency onto the normal jar of Groovy.
Please make sure to go to the plugin homepage in order to find the latest documentation and version.
2.3. Groovysh, the Groovy shell
2.3.1. Groovy : Groovy Shell
The Groovy Shell, aka. groovysh
is a command-line application which
allows easy access to evaluate Groovy expressions, define classes and
run simple experiments.
Features
-
No need for
go
command to execute buffer. -
Rich cross-platform edit-line editing, history and completion thanks to JLine2.
-
ANSI colors (prompt, exception traces, etc).
-
Simple, yet robust, command system with online help, user alias support and more.
-
User profile support
Command-line Options and Arguments
The shell supports several options to control verbosity, ANSI coloring and other features.
./bin/groovysh --help
Usage: groovysh [options] [...]
The Groovy Shell, aka groovysh, is a command-line application which allows easy
access to evaluate Groovy expressions, define classes and run simple
experiments.
-C, --color[=<FLAG>] Enable or disable use of ANSI colors
-cp, -classpath, --classpath
Specify where to find the class files - must be first
argument
-d, --debug Enable debug output
-D, --define=<name=value>
Define a system property
-e, --evaluate=<CODE> Evaluate the code first when starting interactive session
-h, --help Display this help message
-pa, --parameters Generate metadata for reflection on method parameter names
(jdk8+ only)
-pr, --enable-preview Enable preview Java features (JEP 12) (jdk12+ only)
-q, --quiet Suppress superfluous output
-T, --terminal=<TYPE> Specify the terminal TYPE to use
-v, --verbose Enable verbose output
-V, --version Display the version
Evaluating Expressions
Evaluation Result
When a complete expression is found, it is compiled and evaluated. The result of the evaluation is stored into the _ variable.
Multi-line Expressions
Multi-line/complex expressions (like closure or class definitions) may be defined over several lines. When the shell detects that it has a complete expression it will compile and evaluate it.
Variables
Shell variables are all untyped (i.e. no def
or other type information).
This will set a shell variable:
foo = "bar"
But, this will evaluate a local variable and will not be saved to the shell’s environment:
def foo = "bar"
This behavior can be changed by activating interpreter mode.
Functions
Functions can be defined in the shell, and will be saved for later use.
Defining a function is easy:
groovy:000> def hello(name) {
groovy:001> println("Hello $name")
groovy:002> }
And then using it is as one might expect:
hello("Jason")
Internally the shell creates a closure to encapsulate the function and then binds the closure to a variable. So variables and functions share the same namespace.
Commands
The shell has a number of different commands, which provide rich access to the shell’s environment.
Commands all have a name and a shortcut (which is something like
\h
). Commands may also have some predefined system aliases. Users
may also create their own aliases.
Recognized Commands
help
Display the list of commands (and aliases) or the help text for specific command.
The Command List
groovy:000> :help For information about Groovy, visit: http://groovy-lang.org Available commands: :help (:h ) Display this help message ? (:? ) Alias to: :help :exit (:x ) Exit the shell :quit (:q ) Alias to: :exit import (:i ) Import a class into the namespace :display (:d ) Display the current buffer :clear (:c ) Clear the buffer and reset the prompt counter :show (:S ) Show variables, classes or imports :inspect (:n ) Inspect a variable or the last result with the GUI object browser :purge (:p ) Purge variables, classes, imports or preferences :edit (:e ) Edit the current buffer :load (:l ) Load a file or URL into the buffer . (:. ) Alias to: :load :save (:s ) Save the current buffer to a file :record (:r ) Record the current session to a file :history (:H ) Display, manage and recall edit-line history :alias (:a ) Create an alias :set (:= ) Set (or list) preferences :grab (:g ) Add a dependency to the shell environment :register (:rc) Register a new command with the shell :doc (:D ) Open a browser window displaying the doc for the argument For help on a specific command type: :help <command>
Help for a Command
While in the interactive shell, you can ask for help for any command to
get more details about its syntax or function. Here is an example of
what happens when you ask for help for the help
command:
groovy:000> :help :help usage: :help [<command>] Display the list of commands or the help text for <command>.
exit
Exit the shell.
This is the only way to exit the shell. Well, you can still CTRL-C
,
but the shell will complain about an abnormal shutdown of the JVM.
import
Add a custom import which will be included for all shell evaluations.
This command can be given at any time to add new imports.
grab
Grab a dependency (Maven, Ivy, etc.) from Internet sources or cache, and add it to the Groovy Shell environment.
groovy:000> :grab 'com.google.guava:guava:19.0' groovy:000> import com.google.common.collect.BiMap ===> com.google.common.collect.BiMap
This command can be given at any time to add new dependencies.
display
Display the contents of the current buffer.
This only displays the buffer of an incomplete expression. Once the expression is complete, the buffer is rest. The prompt will update to show the size of the current buffer as well.
Example
groovy:000> class Foo { groovy:001> def bar groovy:002> def baz() { groovy:003> :display 001> class Foo { 002> def bar 003> def baz() {
clear
Clears the current buffer, resetting the prompt counter to 000. Can be used to recover from compilation errors.
show
Show variables, classes or preferences or imports.
show variables
groovy:000> :show variables Variables: _ = true
show classes
show imports
show preferences
show all
purge
Purges objects from the shell.
purge variables
purge classes
purge imports
purge preferences
purge all
edit
Edit the current buffer in an external editor.
Currently only works on UNIX systems which have the EDITOR
environment
variable set, or have configured the editor
preference.
history
Display, manage and recall edit-line history.
history show
history recall
history flush
history clear
doc
Opens a browser with documentation for the provided class. For example:
groovy:000> :doc java.util.List http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/util/List.html http://docs.groovy-lang.org/2.4.2-SNAPSHOT/html/groovy-jdk/java/util/List.html
will open two windows (or tabs, depending on your browser):
-
one for the JDK documentation
-
one for the GDK documentation
Preferences
Some of aspects of groovysh
behaviors can be customized by setting
preferences. Preferences are set using the set
command or the :=
shortcut.
Recognized Preferences
interpreterMode
Allows the use of typed variables (i.e. def
or other type information):
groovy:000> def x = 3 ===> 3 groovy:000> x ===> 3
It’s especially useful for copy&pasting code from tutorials etc. into the running session.
Custom commands
The register
command allows you to register custom commands in the shell. For example, writing the following
will register the Stats
command:
groovy:000> :register Stats
where the Stats
class is a class extending the org.apache.groovy.groovysh.CommandSupport
class. For example:
import org.apache.groovy.groovysh.CommandSupport
import org.apache.groovy.groovysh.Groovysh
class Stats extends CommandSupport {
protected Stats(final Groovysh shell) {
super(shell, 'stats', 'T')
}
public Object execute(List args) {
println "Free memory: ${Runtime.runtime.freeMemory()}"
}
}
Then the command can be called using:
groovy:000> :stats stats Free memory: 139474880 groovy:000>
Note that the command class must be found on classpath: you cannot define a new command from within the shell.
Troubleshooting
Please report any problems you
run into. Please be sure to mark the JIRA issue with the Groovysh
component.
Platform Problems
On Windows, JLine2 (which is used for the fancy
shell input/history/completion fluff), uses a tiny DLL file to trick
the evil Windows faux-shell (CMD.EXE
or COMMAND.COM
) into
providing Java with unbuffered input. In some rare cases, this might
fail to load or initialize.
One solution is to disable the frills and use the unsupported terminal
instance. You can do that on the command-line using the --terminal
flag and set it to one of:
-
none
-
false
-
off
-
jline.UnsupportedTerminal
groovysh --terminal=none
2.3.2. GMavenPlus Maven Plugin
GMavenPlus is a Maven plugin with goals that support launching a Groovy Shell or Groovy Console bound to a Maven project.
2.3.3. Gradle Groovysh Plugin
Gradle Groovysh Plugin is a Gradle plugin that provides gradle tasks to start a Groovy Shell bound to a Gradle project.
2.4. groovyConsole, the Groovy swing console
2.4.1. Groovy : Groovy Console
The Groovy Swing Console allows a user to enter and run Groovy scripts. This page documents the features of this user interface.
2.4.2. Basics
-
Groovy Console is launched via
groovyConsole
orgroovyConsole.bat
, both located in$GROOVY_HOME/bin
-
The Console has an input area and an output area.
-
You type a Groovy script in the input area.
-
When you select
Run
from theActions
menu, the console compiles the script and runs it. -
Anything that would normally be printed on
System.out
is printed in the output area. -
If the script returns a non-null result, that result is printed.
2.4.3. Features
Command-line Options and Arguments
The Groovy Console supports several options to control classpath and other features.
./bin/groovyConsole --help
Usage: groovyConsole [options] [filename]
The Groovy Swing Console allows a user to enter and run Groovy scripts.
--configscript=PARAM A script for tweaking the compiler configuration options
-cp, -classpath, --classpath
Specify where to find the class files - must be first
argument
-D, --define=<name=value> Define a system property
-h, --help Display this help message
-i, --indy Enable InvokeDynamic (Indy) compilation for scripts
-pa, --parameters Generate metadata for reflection on method parameter
names (jdk8+ only)
-pr, --enable-preview Enable preview Java features (JEP 12) (jdk12+ only)
-V, --version Display the version
Running Scripts
There are several shortcuts that you can use to run scripts or code snippets:
-
Ctrl+Enter
andCtrl+R
are both shortcut keys forRun Script
. -
If you highlight just part of the text in the input area, then Groovy runs just that text.
-
The result of a script is the value of the last expression executed.
-
You can turn the System.out capture on and off by selecting
Capture System.out
from theActions
menu
Editing Files
You can open any text file, edit it, run it (as a Groovy Script) and then save it again when you are finished.
-
Select
File > Open
(shortcut keyctrl+O
) to open a file -
Select
File > Save
(shortcut keyctrl+S
) to save a file -
Select
File > New File
(shortcut keyctrl+Q
) to start again with a blank input area
History and results
-
You can pop-up a gui inspector on the last (non-null) result by selecting
Inspect Last
from theActions
menu. The inspector is a convenient way to view lists and maps. -
The console remembers the last ten script runs. You can scroll back and forth through the history by selecting
Next
andPrevious
from theEdit
menu.Ctrl-N
andctrl-P
are convenient shortcut keys. -
The last (non-null) result is bound to a variable named
_
(an underscore). -
The last result (null and non-null) for every run in the history is bound into a list variable named
(two underscores). The result of the last run is
[-1]
, the result of the second to last run is__[-2]
and so forth.
Interrupting a script
The Groovy console is a very handy tool to develop scripts. Often, you will
find yourself running a script multiple times until it works the way you want
it to. However, what if your code takes too long to finish or worse, creates
an infinite loop? Interrupting script execution can be achieved by clicking
the interrupt
button on the small dialog box that pops up when a script
is executing or through the interrupt
icon in the tool bar.
However, this may not be sufficient to interrupt a script: clicking the button
will interrupt the execution thread, but if your code doesn’t handle the interrupt
flag, the script is likely to keep running without you being able to effectively
stop it. To avoid that, you have to make sure that the Script > Allow interruption
menu item is flagged. This will automatically apply an AST transformation to your
script which will take care of checking the interrupt flag (@ThreadInterrupt
).
This way, you guarantee that the script can be interrupted even if you don’t explicitly
handle interruption, at the cost of extra execution time.
And more
-
You can change the font size by selecting
Smaller Font
orLarger Font
from theActions menu
-
The console can be run as an Applet thanks to
groovy.ui.ConsoleApplet
-
Code is auto indented when you hit return
-
You can drag’n’drop a Groovy script over the text area to open a file
-
You can modify the classpath with which the script in the console is being run by adding a new JAR or a directory to the classpath from the
Script
menu -
Error hyperlinking from the output area when a compilation error is expected or when an exception is thrown
-
You can enable InvokeDynamic (Indy) compilation mode by selecting
Enable Indy Compilation
from theScript
menu
2.4.4. Embedding the Console
To embed a Swing console in your application, simply create the Console object, load some variables, and then launch it. The console can be embedded in either Java or Groovy code. The Java code for this is:
import groovy.ui.Console;
...
Console console = new Console();
console.setVariable("var1", getValueOfVar1());
console.setVariable("var2", getValueOfVar2());
console.run();
...
Once the console is launched, you can use the variable values in Groovy code.
2.4.5. Visualizing script output results
You can customize the way script output results are visualized. Let’s see how we can customize this. For example, viewing a map result would show something like this:
What you see here is the usual textual representation of a Map. But,
what if we enabled custom visualization of certain results? The Swing
console allows you to do just that. First of all, you have to ensure
that the visualization option is ticked: View → Visualize Script
Results
— for the record, all settings of the Groovy Console are stored
and remembered thanks to the Preference API. There are a few result
visualizations built-in: if the script returns a java.awt.Image
, a
javax.swing.Icon
, or a java.awt.Component
with no parent, the object is
displayed instead of its toString()
representation. Otherwise,
everything else is still just represented as text. Now, create the
following Groovy script in ~/.groovy/OutputTransforms.groovy
:
import javax.swing.*
transforms << { result ->
if (result instanceof Map) {
def table = new JTable(
result.collect{ k, v ->
[k, v?.inspect()] as Object[]
} as Object[][],
['Key', 'Value'] as Object[])
table.preferredViewportSize = table.preferredSize
return new JScrollPane(table)
}
}
The Groovy Swing console will execute that script on startup, injecting a transforms list in the binding of the script, so that you can add your own script results representations. In our case, we transform the Map into a nice-looking Swing JTable. We’re now able to visualize maps in a friendly and attractive fashion, as the screenshot below shows:
2.4.6. Advanced debugging: AST browser
Groovy Console can visualize the AST (Abstract Syntax Tree) representing
the currently edited script, as shown by the screenshot below. This is
useful when you want to understand how an AST transformation
is working and particularly handy if you are developing your own AST transform.
In the example below, we have annotated our class with the @Immutable
annotation
and the Groovy compiler has generated a lot of boilerplate code for us.
We can see the code for the generated equals method in the Source
tab.
We can even examine the JVM bytecode generated by the compiler.
In the image below we are looking at the bytecode for the Groovy
expression LocalDate.parse('2020/02/10', 'yyyy/MM/dd')
.
2.5. groovydoc, the Groovy & Java documentation generator
GroovyDoc is a tool responsible for generating documentation from your code. It acts like the Javadoc tool in the
Java world but is capable of handling both groovy
and java
files. The distribution comes with two ways of generating
documentation: from command line or from Apache Ant. Other build tools
like Maven or Gradle also offer wrappers for Groovydoc.
2.5.1. The groovydoc command line tool
The groovydoc
command line can be invoked to generate groovydocs:
groovydoc [options] [packagenames] [sourcefiles]
where options must be picked from the following table:
Short version | Long version | Description |
---|---|---|
-windowtitle <text> |
Browser window title for the documentation |
|
-author |
Include @author paragraphs (currently not used) |
|
-charset <charset> |
Charset for cross-platform viewing of generated documentation |
|
-classpath, -cp |
--classpath |
Specify where to find the class files - must be first argument |
-d |
--destdir <dir> |
Destination directory for output files |
--debug |
Enable debug output |
|
-doctitle <html> |
Include title for the overview page |
|
-exclude <pkglist> |
Specify a list of packages to exclude (separated by colons for all operating systems) |
|
-fileEncoding <charset> |
Charset for generated documentation files |
|
-footer <html> |
Include footer text for each page |
|
-header <html> |
Include header text for each page |
|
-help |
--help |
Display help message |
-nomainforscripts |
Don’t include the implicit 'public static void main' method for scripts |
|
-noscripts |
Don’t process Groovy Scripts |
|
-notimestamp |
Don’t include timestamp within hidden comment in generated HTML |
|
-noversionstamp |
Don’t include Groovy version within hidden comment in generated HTML |
|
-overview <file> |
Read overview documentation from HTML file |
|
-package |
Show package/protected/public classes and members |
|
-private |
Show all classes and members |
|
-protected |
Show protected/public classes and members (default) |
|
-public |
Show only public classes and members |
|
-quiet |
Suppress superfluous output |
|
-sourcepath <pathlist> |
Specify where to find source files (dirs separated by platform path separator) |
|
-stylesheetfile <path> |
File to change style of the generated documentation |
|
-verbose |
Enable verbose output |
|
--version |
Display the version |
2.5.2. The groovydoc Ant task
The groovydoc
Ant task allows generating groovydocs from an Ant build.
Required taskdef
Assuming all the groovy jars you need are in my.classpath (this will be groovy-VERSION.jar
,
groovy-ant-VERSION.jar
, groovy-groovydoc-VERSION.jar
plus any modules and transitive dependencies you might be using)
you will need to declare this task at some point in the build.xml prior to the groovydoc task being invoked.
<taskdef name = "groovydoc"
classname = "org.codehaus.groovy.ant.Groovydoc"
classpathref = "my.classpath"/>
<groovydoc> Attributes
Attribute | Description | Required |
---|---|---|
private |
Show all classes and members (i.e. including private ones) if set to ``true''. |
No |
destdir |
Location to store the class files. |
Yes |
sourcepath |
The sourcepath to use. |
No |
packagenames |
Comma separated list of package files (with terminating wildcard). |
No |
use |
Create class and package usage pages. |
No |
windowtitle |
Browser window title for the documentation (text). |
No |
doctitle |
Include title for the package index(first) page (html-code). |
No |
header |
Include header text for each page (html-code). |
No |
footer |
Include footer text for each page (html-code). |
No |
overview |
Read overview documentation from HTML file. |
No |
<groovydoc> Nested Elements
link
Create link to groovydoc/javadoc output at the given URL.
Attribute | Description | Required |
---|---|---|
href |
Base URL of external site |
Yes |
packages |
Comma separated list of package prefixes |
Yes |
Example #1 - <groovydoc> Ant task
<taskdef name = "groovydoc"
classname = "org.codehaus.groovy.ant.Groovydoc"
classpathref = "path_to_groovy_all"/>
<groovydoc destdir = "${docsDirectory}/gapi"
sourcepath = "${mainSourceDirectory}"
packagenames = "**.*"
use = "true"
windowtitle = "${title}"
doctitle = "${title}"
header = "${title}"
footer = "${docFooter}"
overview = "src/main/overview.html"
private = "false">
<link packages="java.,org.xml.,javax.,org.xml." href="http://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/"/>
<link packages="org.apache.tools.ant." href="http://docs.groovy-lang.org/docs/ant/api/"/>
<link packages="org.junit.,junit.framework." href="http://junit.org/junit4/javadoc/latest/"/>
<link packages="groovy.,org.codehaus.groovy." href="http://docs.groovy-lang.org/latest/html/api/"/>
<link packages="org.codehaus.gmaven." href="http://groovy.github.io/gmaven/apidocs/"/>
</groovydoc>
Example #2 - Executing <groovydoc> from Groovy
def ant = new AntBuilder()
ant.taskdef(name: "groovydoc", classname: "org.codehaus.groovy.ant.Groovydoc")
ant.groovydoc(
destdir : "${docsDirectory}/gapi",
sourcepath : "${mainSourceDirectory}",
packagenames : "**.*",
use : "true",
windowtitle : "${title}",
doctitle : "${title}",
header : "${title}",
footer : "${docFooter}",
overview : "src/main/overview.html",
private : "false") {
link(packages:"java.,org.xml.,javax.,org.xml.",href:"http://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/")
link(packages:"groovy.,org.codehaus.groovy.", href:"http://docs.groovy-lang.org/latest/html/api/")
link(packages:"org.apache.tools.ant.", href:"http://docs.groovy-lang.org/docs/ant/api/")
link(packages:"org.junit.,junit.framework.", href:"http://junit.org/junit4/javadoc/latest/")
link(packages:"org.codehaus.gmaven.", href:"http://groovy.github.io/gmaven/apidocs/")
}
Custom templates
The groovydoc
Ant task supports custom templates, but it requires two steps:
-
A custom groovydoc class
-
A new groovydoc task definition
Custom Groovydoc class
The first step requires you to extend the Groovydoc
class, like in the following example:
package org.codehaus.groovy.tools.groovydoc;
import org.codehaus.groovy.ant.Groovydoc;
/**
* Overrides GroovyDoc's default class template - for testing purpose only.
*/
public class CustomGroovyDoc extends Groovydoc {
@Override
protected String[] getClassTemplates() {
return new String[]{"org/codehaus/groovy/tools/groovydoc/testfiles/classDocName.html"};
}
}
You can override the following methods:
-
getClassTemplates
for class-level templates -
getPackageTemplates
for package-level templates -
getDocTemplates
for top-level templates
You can find the list of default templates in the org.codehaus.groovy.tools.groovydoc.gstringTemplates.GroovyDocTemplateInfo
class.
Using the custom groovydoc task
Once you’ve written the class, using it is just a matter of redefining the groovydoc
task:
<taskdef name = "groovydoc"
classname = "org.codehaus.groovy.ant.CustomGroovyDoc"
classpathref = "path_to_groovy_all"/>
Please note that template customization is provided as is. APIs are subject to change, so you must consider this as a fragile feature.
2.5.3. GMavenPlus Maven Plugin
GMavenPlus is a Maven plugin with goals that support GroovyDoc generation.
3. User Guides
3.1. Getting started
3.1.1. Download
In this download area, you will be able to download the distribution (binary and source), the Windows installer and the documentation for Groovy.
For a quick and effortless start on Mac OSX, Linux or Cygwin, you can use SDKMAN! (The Software Development Kit Manager) to download and configure any Groovy version of your choice. Basic instructions can be found below.
Stable
-
Download zip: Binary Release | Source Release
-
Download documentation: JavaDoc and zipped online documentation
-
Combined binary / source / documentation bundle: Distribution bundle
You can learn more about this version in the release notes or in the changelog.
If you plan on using invokedynamic support, read those notes.
Snapshots
For those who want to test the very latest versions of Groovy and live on the bleeding edge, you can use our snapshot builds. As soon as a build succeeds on our continuous integration server a snapshot is deployed to Artifactory’s OSS snapshot repository.
Prerequisites
Groovy 3.0 requires Java 6+ with full support up to Java 8.
There are currently some known issues for some aspects when using Java 9 snapshots.
The groovy-nio
module requires Java 7+.
Using Groovy’s invokeDynamic features require Java 7+ but we recommend Java 8.
The Groovy CI server is also useful to look at to confirm supported Java versions for different Groovy releases. The test suite (getting close to 10000 tests) runs for the currently supported streams of Groovy across all the main versions of Java each stream supports.
3.1.2. Maven Repository
If you wish to embed Groovy in your application, you may just prefer to point to your favourite maven repositories or the JCenter maven repository.
Stable Release
Gradle | Maven | Explanation |
---|---|---|
'org.codehaus.groovy:groovy:3.0.7' |
<groupId>org.codehaus.groovy</groupId> |
Just the core of groovy without the modules (see below). |
'org.codehaus.groovy:groovy-$module:3.0.7' |
<groupId>org.codehaus.groovy</groupId> |
"$module" stands for the different optional groovy modules "ant", "bsf", "console", "docgenerator", "groovydoc", "groovysh", "jmx", "json", "jsr223", "servlet", "sql", "swing", "test", "testng" and "xml". Example: <artifactId>groovy-sql</artifactId> |
'org.codehaus.groovy:groovy-all:3.0.7' |
<groupId>org.codehaus.groovy</groupId> |
The core plus all the modules. Optional dependencies are marked as optional. You may need to include some of the optional dependencies to use some features of Groovy, e.g. AntBuilder, GroovyMBeans, etc. |
To use the InvokeDynamic version of the jars just append ':indy' for Gradle or <classifier>indy</classifier> for Maven.
3.1.3. SDKMAN! (The Software Development Kit Manager)
This tool makes installing Groovy on any Bash platform (Mac OSX, Linux, Cygwin, Solaris or FreeBSD) very easy.
Simply open a new terminal and enter:
$ curl -s get.sdkman.io | bash
Follow the instructions on-screen to complete installation.
Open a new terminal or type the command:
$ source "$HOME/.sdkman/bin/sdkman-init.sh"
Then install the latest stable Groovy:
$ sdk install groovy
After installation is complete and you’ve made it your default version, test it with:
$ groovy -version
That’s all there is to it!
3.1.4. Other ways to get Groovy
Installation on Windows
If you’re on Windows, you can also use the NSIS Windows installer.
Other Distributions
You may download other distributions of Groovy from this site.
Source Code
If you prefer to live on the bleeding edge, you can also grab the source code from GitHub.
IDE plugin
If you are an IDE user, you can just grab the latest IDE plugin and follow the plugin installation instructions.
3.1.5. Install Binary
These instructions describe how to install a binary distribution of Groovy.
-
First, Download a binary distribution of Groovy and unpack it into some file on your local file system.
-
Set your
GROOVY_HOME
environment variable to the directory you unpacked the distribution. -
Add
GROOVY_HOME/bin
to yourPATH
environment variable. -
Set your
JAVA_HOME
environment variable to point to your JDK. On OS X this is/Library/Java/Home
, on other unixes its often/usr/java
etc. If you’ve already installed tools like Ant or Maven you’ve probably already done this step.
You should now have Groovy installed properly. You can test this by typing the following in a command shell:
groovysh
Which should create an interactive groovy shell where you can type Groovy statements. Or to run the Swing interactive console type:
groovyConsole
To run a specific Groovy script type:
groovy SomeScript
3.2. Differences with Java
Groovy tries to be as natural as possible for Java developers. We’ve tried to follow the principle of least surprise when designing Groovy, particularly for developers learning Groovy who’ve come from a Java background.
Here we list all the major differences between Java and Groovy.
3.2.1. Default imports
All these packages and classes are imported by default, i.e. you do not
have to use an explicit import
statement to use them:
-
java.io.*
-
java.lang.*
-
java.math.BigDecimal
-
java.math.BigInteger
-
java.net.*
-
java.util.*
-
groovy.lang.*
-
groovy.util.*
3.2.2. Multi-methods
In Groovy, the methods which will be invoked are chosen at runtime. This is called runtime dispatch or multi-methods. It means that the method will be chosen based on the types of the arguments at runtime. In Java, this is the opposite: methods are chosen at compile time, based on the declared types.
The following code, written as Java code, can be compiled in both Java and Groovy, but it will behave differently:
int method(String arg) {
return 1;
}
int method(Object arg) {
return 2;
}
Object o = "Object";
int result = method(o);
In Java, you would have:
assertEquals(2, result);
Whereas in Groovy:
assertEquals(1, result);
That is because Java will use the static information type, which is that o
is declared as an Object
, whereas
Groovy will choose at runtime, when the method is actually called. Since it is called with a String
, then the
String
version is called.
3.2.3. Array initializers
In Java, array initializers take either of these two forms:
int[] array = {1, 2, 3}; // Java array initializer shorthand syntax
int[] array2 = new int[] {4, 5, 6}; // Java array initializer long syntax
In Groovy, the { … }
block is reserved for closures.
That means that you cannot create array literals using Java’s array initializer shorthand syntax.
You instead borrow Groovy’s literal list notation like this:
int[] array = [1, 2, 3]
For Groovy 3+, you can optionally use the Java’s array initializer long syntax:
def array2 = new int[] {1, 2, 3} // Groovy 3.0+ supports the Java-style array initialization long syntax
3.2.4. Package scope visibility
In Groovy, omitting a modifier on a field doesn’t result in a package-private field like in Java:
class Person {
String name
}
Instead, it is used to create a property, that is to say a private field, an associated getter and an associated setter.
It is possible to create a package-private field by annotating it with @PackageScope
:
class Person {
@PackageScope String name
}
3.2.5. ARM blocks
Java 7 introduced ARM (Automatic Resource Management) blocks like this:
Path file = Paths.get("/path/to/file");
Charset charset = Charset.forName("UTF-8");
try (BufferedReader reader = Files.newBufferedReader(file, charset)) {
String line;
while ((line = reader.readLine()) != null) {
System.out.println(line);
}
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
Such blocks are supported from Groovy 3+. However, Groovy provides various methods relying on closures, which have the same effect while being more idiomatic. For example:
new File('/path/to/file').eachLine('UTF-8') {
println it
}
or, if you want a version closer to Java:
new File('/path/to/file').withReader('UTF-8') { reader ->
reader.eachLine {
println it
}
}
3.2.6. Inner classes
The implementation of anonymous inner classes and nested classes follow Java closely,
but there are some differences, e.g.
local variables accessed from within such classes don’t have to be final.
We piggy-back on some implementation details we use for groovy.lang.Closure
when generating inner class bytecode.
|
Static inner classes
Here’s an example of static inner class:
class A {
static class B {}
}
new A.B()
The usage of static inner classes is the best supported one. If you absolutely need an inner class, you should make it a static one.
Anonymous Inner Classes
import java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit
CountDownLatch called = new CountDownLatch(1)
Timer timer = new Timer()
timer.schedule(new TimerTask() {
void run() {
called.countDown()
}
}, 0)
assert called.await(10, TimeUnit.SECONDS)
Creating Instances of Non-Static Inner Classes
In Java you can do this:
public class Y {
public class X {}
public X foo() {
return new X();
}
public static X createX(Y y) {
return y.new X();
}
}
Before 3.0.0, Groovy doesn’t support the y.new X()
syntax. Instead, you have to write new X(y)
, like in the code below:
public class Y {
public class X {}
public X foo() {
return new X()
}
public static X createX(Y y) {
return new X(y)
}
}
Caution though, Groovy supports calling methods with one parameter without giving an argument. The parameter will then have the value null. Basically the same rules apply to calling a constructor. There is a danger that you will write new X() instead of new X(this) for example. Since this might also be the regular way we have not yet found a good way to prevent this problem. |
Groovy 3.0.0 supports Java style syntax for creating instances of non-static inner classes. |
3.2.7. Lambda expressions and the method reference operator
Java 8+ supports lambda expressions and the method reference operator (::
):
Runnable run = () -> System.out.println("Run"); // Java
list.forEach(System.out::println);
Groovy 3 and above also support these within the Parrot parser. In earlier versions of Groovy you should use closures instead:
Runnable run = { println 'run' }
list.each { println it } // or list.each(this.&println)
3.2.8. GStrings
As double-quoted string literals are interpreted as GString
values, Groovy may fail
with compile error or produce subtly different code if a class with String
literal
containing a dollar character is compiled with Groovy and Java compiler.
While typically, Groovy will auto-cast between GString
and String
if an API declares
the type of a parameter, beware of Java APIs that accept an Object
parameter and then
check the actual type.
3.2.9. String and Character literals
Singly-quoted literals in Groovy are used for String
, and double-quoted result in
String
or GString
, depending whether there is interpolation in the literal.
assert 'c'.getClass()==String
assert "c".getClass()==String
assert "c${1}".getClass() in GString
Groovy will automatically cast a single-character String
to char
only when assigning to
a variable of type char
. When calling methods with arguments of type char
we need
to either cast explicitly or make sure the value has been cast in advance.
char a='a'
assert Character.digit(a, 16)==10 : 'But Groovy does boxing'
assert Character.digit((char) 'a', 16)==10
try {
assert Character.digit('a', 16)==10
assert false: 'Need explicit cast'
} catch(MissingMethodException e) {
}
Groovy supports two styles of casting and in the case of casting to char
there
are subtle differences when casting a multi-char strings. The Groovy style cast is
more lenient and will take the first character, while the C-style cast will fail
with exception.
// for single char strings, both are the same
assert ((char) "c").class==Character
assert ("c" as char).class==Character
// for multi char strings they are not
try {
((char) 'cx') == 'c'
assert false: 'will fail - not castable'
} catch(GroovyCastException e) {
}
assert ('cx' as char) == 'c'
assert 'cx'.asType(char) == 'c'
3.2.10. Primitives and wrappers
Because Groovy uses Objects for everything, it autowraps references
to primitives. Because of this, it does not follow Java’s behavior of widening taking priority over boxing.
Here’s an example using int
int i
m(i)
void m(long l) { (1)
println "in m(long)"
}
void m(Integer i) { (2)
println "in m(Integer)"
}
1 | This is the method that Java would call, since widening has precedence over unboxing. |
2 | This is the method Groovy actually calls, since all primitive references use their wrapper class. |
3.2.11. Behaviour of ==
In Java ==
means equality of primitive types or identity for objects.
In Groovy ==
means equality in all cases.
It translates to a.compareTo(b) == 0
, when evaluating equality for Comparable
objects,
and a.equals(b)
otherwise.
To check for identity (reference equality), use the is
method: a.is(b)
.
From Groovy 3, you can also use the ===
operator (or negated version): a === b
(or c !== d
).
3.2.12. Conversions
Java does automatic widening and narrowing conversions.
Converts to |
||||||||
Converts from |
boolean |
byte |
short |
char |
int |
long |
float |
double |
boolean |
- |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
byte |
N |
- |
Y |
C |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
short |
N |
C |
- |
C |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
char |
N |
C |
C |
- |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
int |
N |
C |
C |
C |
- |
Y |
T |
Y |
long |
N |
C |
C |
C |
C |
- |
T |
T |
float |
N |
C |
C |
C |
C |
C |
- |
Y |
double |
N |
C |
C |
C |
C |
C |
C |
- |
* 'Y' indicates a conversion Java can make, 'C' indicates a conversion Java can make when there is an explicit cast, 'T` indicates a conversion Java can make but data is truncated, 'N' indicates a conversion Java can’t make.
Groovy expands greatly on this.
Converts to |
||||||||||||||||||
Converts from |
boolean |
Boolean |
byte |
Byte |
short |
Short |
char |
Character |
int |
Integer |
long |
Long |
BigInteger |
float |
Float |
double |
Double |
BigDecimal |
boolean |
- |
B |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
Boolean |
B |
- |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
byte |
T |
T |
- |
B |
Y |
Y |
Y |
D |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Byte |
T |
T |
B |
- |
Y |
Y |
Y |
D |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
short |
T |
T |
D |
D |
- |
B |
Y |
D |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Short |
T |
T |
D |
T |
B |
- |
Y |
D |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
char |
T |
T |
Y |
D |
Y |
D |
- |
D |
Y |
D |
Y |
D |
D |
Y |
D |
Y |
D |
D |
Character |
T |
T |
D |
D |
D |
D |
D |
- |
D |
D |
D |
D |
D |
D |
D |
D |
D |
D |
int |
T |
T |
D |
D |
D |
D |
Y |
D |
- |
B |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Integer |
T |
T |
D |
D |
D |
D |
Y |
D |
B |
- |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
long |
T |
T |
D |
D |
D |
D |
Y |
D |
D |
D |
- |
B |
Y |
T |
T |
T |
T |
Y |
Long |
T |
T |
D |
D |
D |
T |
Y |
D |
D |
T |
B |
- |
Y |
T |
T |
T |
T |
Y |
BigInteger |
T |
T |
D |
D |
D |
D |
D |
D |
D |
D |
D |
D |
- |
D |
D |
D |
D |
T |
float |
T |
T |
D |
D |
D |
D |
T |
D |
D |
D |
D |
D |
D |
- |
B |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Float |
T |
T |
D |
T |
D |
T |
T |
D |
D |
T |
D |
T |
D |
B |
- |
Y |
Y |
Y |
double |
T |
T |
D |
D |
D |
D |
T |
D |
D |
D |
D |
D |
D |
D |
D |
- |
B |
Y |
Double |
T |
T |
D |
T |
D |
T |
T |
D |
D |
T |
D |
T |
D |
D |
T |
B |
- |
Y |
BigDecimal |
T |
T |
D |
D |
D |
D |
D |
D |
D |
D |
D |
D |
D |
T |
D |
T |
D |
- |
* 'Y' indicates a conversion Groovy can make, 'D' indicates a conversion Groovy can make when compiled dynamically or explicitly cast, 'T` indicates a conversion Groovy can make but data is truncated, 'B' indicates a boxing/unboxing operation, 'N' indicates a conversion Groovy can’t make.
The truncation uses Groovy Truth when converting to boolean
/Boolean
. Converting
from a number to a character casts the Number.intvalue()
to char
. Groovy constructs BigInteger
and BigDecimal
using Number.doubleValue()
when converting from a Float
or Double
, otherwise it constructs using toString()
.
Other conversions have their behavior defined by java.lang.Number
.
3.2.13. Extra keywords
Groovy has many of the same keywords as Java and Groovy 3 also has the same var
reserved type as Java.
In addition, Groovy has the following keywords:
-
as
-
def
-
in
-
trait
-
it
// within closures
Groovy is less stringent than Java in that it allows some keywords to appear in places that would be illegal in Java,
e.g. the following is valid: var var = [def: 1, as: 2, in: 3, trait: 4]
.
Never-the-less, you are discouraged from using the above keywords in places that might cause confusion even when
the compiler might be happy. In particular, avoid using them for variable, method and class names,
so our previous var var
example would be considered poor style.
3.3. Groovy Development Kit
3.3.1. Working with IO
Groovy provides a number of helper methods for working with I/O. While you could use standard Java code in Groovy to deal with those, Groovy provides much more convenient ways to handle files, streams, readers, …
In particular, you should take a look at methods added to:
-
the
java.io.File
class : http://docs.groovy-lang.org/latest/html/groovy-jdk/java/io/File.html -
the
java.io.InputStream
class: http://docs.groovy-lang.org/latest/html/groovy-jdk/java/io/InputStream.html -
the
java.io.OutputStream
class: http://docs.groovy-lang.org/latest/html/groovy-jdk/java/io/OutputStream.html -
the
java.io.Reader
class: http://docs.groovy-lang.org/latest/html/groovy-jdk/java/io/Reader.html -
the
java.io.Writer
class: http://docs.groovy-lang.org/latest/html/groovy-jdk/java/io/Writer.html -
the
java.nio.file.Path
class: http://docs.groovy-lang.org/latest/html/groovy-jdk/java/nio/file/Path.html
The following section focuses on sample idiomatic constructs using helper methods available above but is not meant to be a complete description of all available methods. For that, please read the GDK API.
Reading files
As a first example, let’s see how you would print all lines of a text file in Groovy:
new File(baseDir, 'haiku.txt').eachLine { line ->
println line
}
The eachLine
method is a method added to the File
class automatically by Groovy and has many variants, for example
if you need to know the line number, you can use this variant:
new File(baseDir, 'haiku.txt').eachLine { line, nb ->
println "Line $nb: $line"
}
If for whatever reason an exception is thrown in the eachLine
body, the method makes sure that the resource
is properly closed. This is true for all I/O resource methods that Groovy adds.
For example in some cases you will prefer to use a Reader
, but still benefit from the automatic resource management
from Groovy. In the next example, the reader will be closed even if the exception occurs:
def count = 0, MAXSIZE = 3
new File(baseDir,"haiku.txt").withReader { reader ->
while (reader.readLine()) {
if (++count > MAXSIZE) {
throw new RuntimeException('Haiku should only have 3 verses')
}
}
}
Should you need to collect the lines of a text file into a list, you can do:
def list = new File(baseDir, 'haiku.txt').collect {it}
Or you can even leverage the as
operator to get the contents of the file into an array of lines:
def array = new File(baseDir, 'haiku.txt') as String[]
How many times did you have to get the contents of a file into a byte[]
and how much code does it require? Groovy
makes it very easy actually:
byte[] contents = file.bytes
Working with I/O is not limited to dealing with files. In fact, a lot of operations rely on input/output streams, hence why Groovy adds a lot of support methods to those, as you can see in the documentation.
As an example, you can obtain an InputStream
from a File
very easily:
def is = new File(baseDir,'haiku.txt').newInputStream()
// do something ...
is.close()
However you can see that it requires you to deal with closing the inputstream. In Groovy it is in general a better
idea to use the withInputStream
idiom that will take care of that for you:
new File(baseDir,'haiku.txt').withInputStream { stream ->
// do something ...
}
Writing files
Of course in some cases you won’t want to read but write a file. One of the options is to use a Writer
:
new File(baseDir,'haiku.txt').withWriter('utf-8') { writer ->
writer.writeLine 'Into the ancient pond'
writer.writeLine 'A frog jumps'
writer.writeLine 'Water’s sound!'
}
But for such a simple example, using the <<
operator would have been enough:
new File(baseDir,'haiku.txt') << '''Into the ancient pond
A frog jumps
Water’s sound!'''
Of course we do not always deal with text contents, so you could use the Writer
or directly write bytes as in
this example:
file.bytes = [66,22,11]
Of course you can also directly deal with output streams. For example, here is how you would create an output stream to write into a file:
def os = new File(baseDir,'data.bin').newOutputStream()
// do something ...
os.close()
However you can see that it requires you to deal with closing the output stream. Again it is in general a better
idea to use the withOutputStream
idiom that will handle the exceptions and close the stream in any case:
new File(baseDir,'data.bin').withOutputStream { stream ->
// do something ...
}
Traversing file trees
In scripting contexts it is a common task to traverse a file tree in order to find some specific files and do something with them. Groovy provides multiple methods to do this. For example you can perform something on all files of a directory:
dir.eachFile { file -> (1)
println file.name
}
dir.eachFileMatch(~/.*\.txt/) { file -> (2)
println file.name
}
1 | executes the closure code on each file found in the directory |
2 | executes the closure code on files in the directory matching the specified pattern |
Often you will have to deal with a deeper hierarchy of files, in which case you can use eachFileRecurse
:
dir.eachFileRecurse { file -> (1)
println file.name
}
dir.eachFileRecurse(FileType.FILES) { file -> (2)
println file.name
}
1 | executes the closure code on each file or directory found in the directory, recursively |
2 | executes the closure code only on files, but recursively |
For more complex traversal techniques you can use the traverse
method, which requires you to set a special flag
indicating what to do with the traversal:
dir.traverse { file ->
if (file.directory && file.name=='bin') {
FileVisitResult.TERMINATE (1)
} else {
println file.name
FileVisitResult.CONTINUE (2)
}
}
1 | if the current file is a directory and its name is bin , stop the traversal |
2 | otherwise print the file name and continue |
Data and objects
In Java it is not uncommon to serialize and deserialize data using the java.io.DataOutputStream
and
java.io.DataInputStream
classes respectively. Groovy will make it even easier to deal with them. For example, you could
serialize data into a file and deserialize it using this code:
boolean b = true
String message = 'Hello from Groovy'
// Serialize data into a file
file.withDataOutputStream { out ->
out.writeBoolean(b)
out.writeUTF(message)
}
// ...
// Then read it back
file.withDataInputStream { input ->
assert input.readBoolean() == b
assert input.readUTF() == message
}
And similarily, if the data you want to serialize implements the Serializable
interface, you can proceed with
an object output stream, as illustrated here:
Person p = new Person(name:'Bob', age:76)
// Serialize data into a file
file.withObjectOutputStream { out ->
out.writeObject(p)
}
// ...
// Then read it back
file.withObjectInputStream { input ->
def p2 = input.readObject()
assert p2.name == p.name
assert p2.age == p.age
}
Executing External Processes
The previous section described how easy it was to deal with files, readers or streams in Groovy. However in domains like system administration or devops it is often required to communicate with external processes.
Groovy provides a simple way to execute command line processes. Simply
write the command line as a string and call the execute()
method.
E.g., on a *nix machine (or a windows machine with appropriate *nix
commands installed), you can execute this:
def process = "ls -l".execute() (1)
println "Found text ${process.text}" (2)
1 | executes the ls command in an external process |
2 | consume the output of the command and retrieve the text |
The execute()
method returns a java.lang.Process
instance which will
subsequently allow the in/out/err streams to be processed and the exit
value from the process to be inspected etc.
e.g. here is the same command as above but we will now process the resulting stream a line at a time:
def process = "ls -l".execute() (1)
process.in.eachLine { line -> (2)
println line (3)
}
1 | executes the ls command in an external process |
2 | for each line of the input stream of the process |
3 | print the line |
It is worth noting that in
corresponds to an input stream to the standard output of the command. out
will refer
to a stream where you can send data to the process (its standard input).
Remember that many commands are shell built-ins and need special handling. So if you want a listing of files in a directory on a Windows machine and write:
def process = "dir".execute()
println "${process.text}"
you will receive an IOException
saying Cannot run program "dir":
CreateProcess error=2, The system cannot find the file specified.
This is because dir
is built-in to the Windows shell (cmd.exe
) and
can’t be run as a simple executable. Instead, you will need to write:
def process = "cmd /c dir".execute()
println "${process.text}"
Also, because this functionality currently makes use of
java.lang.Process
undercover, the deficiencies of that class
must be taken into consideration. In particular, the javadoc
for this class says:
Because some native platforms only provide limited buffer size for standard input and output streams, failure to promptly write the input stream or read the output stream of the subprocess may cause the subprocess to block, and even deadlock
Because of this, Groovy provides some additional helper methods which make stream handling for processes easier.
Here is how to gobble all of the output (including the error stream output) from your process:
def p = "rm -f foo.tmp".execute([], tmpDir)
p.consumeProcessOutput()
p.waitFor()
There are also variations of consumeProcessOutput
that make use of StringBuffer
, InputStream
,
OutputStream
etc… For a complete list, please read the
GDK API for java.lang.Process
In addition, these is a pipeTo
command (mapped to |
to allow overloading) which lets the output stream of one process be fed
into the input stream of another process.
Here are some examples of use:
proc1 = 'ls'.execute()
proc2 = 'tr -d o'.execute()
proc3 = 'tr -d e'.execute()
proc4 = 'tr -d i'.execute()
proc1 | proc2 | proc3 | proc4
proc4.waitFor()
if (proc4.exitValue()) {
println proc4.err.text
} else {
println proc4.text
}
def sout = new StringBuilder()
def serr = new StringBuilder()
proc2 = 'tr -d o'.execute()
proc3 = 'tr -d e'.execute()
proc4 = 'tr -d i'.execute()
proc4.consumeProcessOutput(sout, serr)
proc2 | proc3 | proc4
[proc2, proc3].each { it.consumeProcessErrorStream(serr) }
proc2.withWriter { writer ->
writer << 'testfile.groovy'
}
proc4.waitForOrKill(1000)
println "Standard output: $sout"
println "Standard error: $serr"
3.3.2. Working with collections
Groovy provides native support for various collection types, including lists, maps or ranges. Most of those are based on the Java collection types and decorated with additional methods found in the Groovy development kit.
Lists
List literals
You can create lists as follows. Notice that []
is the empty list
expression.
def list = [5, 6, 7, 8]
assert list.get(2) == 7
assert list[2] == 7
assert list instanceof java.util.List
def emptyList = []
assert emptyList.size() == 0
emptyList.add(5)
assert emptyList.size() == 1
Each list expression creates an implementation of java.util.List.
Of course lists can be used as a source to construct another list:
def list1 = ['a', 'b', 'c']
//construct a new list, seeded with the same items as in list1
def list2 = new ArrayList<String>(list1)
assert list2 == list1 // == checks that each corresponding element is the same
// clone() can also be called
def list3 = list1.clone()
assert list3 == list1
A list is an ordered collection of objects:
def list = [5, 6, 7, 8]
assert list.size() == 4
assert list.getClass() == ArrayList // the specific kind of list being used
assert list[2] == 7 // indexing starts at 0
assert list.getAt(2) == 7 // equivalent method to subscript operator []
assert list.get(2) == 7 // alternative method
list[2] = 9
assert list == [5, 6, 9, 8,] // trailing comma OK
list.putAt(2, 10) // equivalent method to [] when value being changed
assert list == [5, 6, 10, 8]
assert list.set(2, 11) == 10 // alternative method that returns old value
assert list == [5, 6, 11, 8]
assert ['a', 1, 'a', 'a', 2.5, 2.5f, 2.5d, 'hello', 7g, null, 9 as byte]
//objects can be of different types; duplicates allowed
assert [1, 2, 3, 4, 5][-1] == 5 // use negative indices to count from the end
assert [1, 2, 3, 4, 5][-2] == 4
assert [1, 2, 3, 4, 5].getAt(-2) == 4 // getAt() available with negative index...
try {
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5].get(-2) // but negative index not allowed with get()
assert false
} catch (e) {
assert e instanceof IndexOutOfBoundsException
}
List as a boolean expression
Lists can be evaluated as a boolean
value:
assert ![] // an empty list evaluates as false
//all other lists, irrespective of contents, evaluate as true
assert [1] && ['a'] && [0] && [0.0] && [false] && [null]
Iterating on a list
Iterating on elements of a list is usually done calling the each
and eachWithIndex
methods, which execute code on each
item of a list:
[1, 2, 3].each {
println "Item: $it" // `it` is an implicit parameter corresponding to the current element
}
['a', 'b', 'c'].eachWithIndex { it, i -> // `it` is the current element, while `i` is the index
println "$i: $it"
}
In addition to iterating, it is often useful to create a new list by transforming each of its elements into
something else. This operation, often called mapping, is done in Groovy thanks to the collect
method:
assert [1, 2, 3].collect { it * 2 } == [2, 4, 6]
// shortcut syntax instead of collect
assert [1, 2, 3]*.multiply(2) == [1, 2, 3].collect { it.multiply(2) }
def list = [0]
// it is possible to give `collect` the list which collects the elements
assert [1, 2, 3].collect(list) { it * 2 } == [0, 2, 4, 6]
assert list == [0, 2, 4, 6]
Manipulating lists
The Groovy development kit contains a lot of methods on collections that enhance the standard collections with pragmatic methods, some of which are illustrated here:
assert [1, 2, 3].find { it > 1 } == 2 // find 1st element matching criteria
assert [1, 2, 3].findAll { it > 1 } == [2, 3] // find all elements matching critieria
assert ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e'].findIndexOf { // find index of 1st element matching criteria
it in ['c', 'e', 'g']
} == 2
assert ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'c'].indexOf('c') == 2 // index returned
assert ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'c'].indexOf('z') == -1 // index -1 means value not in list
assert ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'c'].lastIndexOf('c') == 4
assert [1, 2, 3].every { it < 5 } // returns true if all elements match the predicate
assert ![1, 2, 3].every { it < 3 }
assert [1, 2, 3].any { it > 2 } // returns true if any element matches the predicate
assert ![1, 2, 3].any { it > 3 }
assert [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6].sum() == 21 // sum anything with a plus() method
assert ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e'].sum {
it == 'a' ? 1 : it == 'b' ? 2 : it == 'c' ? 3 : it == 'd' ? 4 : it == 'e' ? 5 : 0
// custom value to use in sum
} == 15
assert ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e'].sum { ((char) it) - ((char) 'a') } == 10
assert ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e'].sum() == 'abcde'
assert [['a', 'b'], ['c', 'd']].sum() == ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd']
// an initial value can be provided
assert [].sum(1000) == 1000
assert [1, 2, 3].sum(1000) == 1006
assert [1, 2, 3].join('-') == '1-2-3' // String joining
assert [1, 2, 3].inject('counting: ') {
str, item -> str + item // reduce operation
} == 'counting: 123'
assert [1, 2, 3].inject(0) { count, item ->
count + item
} == 6
And here is idiomatic Groovy code for finding the maximum and minimum in a collection:
def list = [9, 4, 2, 10, 5]
assert list.max() == 10
assert list.min() == 2
// we can also compare single characters, as anything comparable
assert ['x', 'y', 'a', 'z'].min() == 'a'
// we can use a closure to specify the sorting behaviour
def list2 = ['abc', 'z', 'xyzuvw', 'Hello', '321']
assert list2.max { it.size() } == 'xyzuvw'
assert list2.min { it.size() } == 'z'
In addition to closures, you can use a Comparator
to define the comparison criteria:
Comparator mc = { a, b -> a == b ? 0 : (a < b ? -1 : 1) }
def list = [7, 4, 9, -6, -1, 11, 2, 3, -9, 5, -13]
assert list.max(mc) == 11
assert list.min(mc) == -13
Comparator mc2 = { a, b -> a == b ? 0 : (Math.abs(a) < Math.abs(b)) ? -1 : 1 }
assert list.max(mc2) == -13
assert list.min(mc2) == -1
assert list.max { a, b -> a.equals(b) ? 0 : Math.abs(a) < Math.abs(b) ? -1 : 1 } == -13
assert list.min { a, b -> a.equals(b) ? 0 : Math.abs(a) < Math.abs(b) ? -1 : 1 } == -1
We can use []
to assign a new empty list and <<
to append items to it:
def list = []
assert list.empty
list << 5
assert list.size() == 1
list << 7 << 'i' << 11
assert list == [5, 7, 'i', 11]
list << ['m', 'o']
assert list == [5, 7, 'i', 11, ['m', 'o']]
//first item in chain of << is target list
assert ([1, 2] << 3 << [4, 5] << 6) == [1, 2, 3, [4, 5], 6]
//using leftShift is equivalent to using <<
assert ([1, 2, 3] << 4) == ([1, 2, 3].leftShift(4))
We can add to a list in many ways:
assert [1, 2] + 3 + [4, 5] + 6 == [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
// equivalent to calling the `plus` method
assert [1, 2].plus(3).plus([4, 5]).plus(6) == [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
def a = [1, 2, 3]
a += 4 // creates a new list and assigns it to `a`
a += [5, 6]
assert a == [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
assert [1, *[222, 333], 456] == [1, 222, 333, 456]
assert [*[1, 2, 3]] == [1, 2, 3]
assert [1, [2, 3, [4, 5], 6], 7, [8, 9]].flatten() == [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
def list = [1, 2]
list.add(3)
list.addAll([5, 4])
assert list == [1, 2, 3, 5, 4]
list = [1, 2]
list.add(1, 3) // add 3 just before index 1
assert list == [1, 3, 2]
list.addAll(2, [5, 4]) //add [5,4] just before index 2
assert list == [1, 3, 5, 4, 2]
list = ['a', 'b', 'z', 'e', 'u', 'v', 'g']
list[8] = 'x' // the [] operator is growing the list as needed
// nulls inserted if required
assert list == ['a', 'b', 'z', 'e', 'u', 'v', 'g', null, 'x']
It is however important that the +
operator on a list is not mutating. Compared to <<
, it will create a new
list, which is often not what you want and can lead to performance issues.
The Groovy development kit also contains methods allowing you to easily remove elements from a list by value:
assert ['a','b','c','b','b'] - 'c' == ['a','b','b','b']
assert ['a','b','c','b','b'] - 'b' == ['a','c']
assert ['a','b','c','b','b'] - ['b','c'] == ['a']
def list = [1,2,3,4,3,2,1]
list -= 3 // creates a new list by removing `3` from the original one
assert list == [1,2,4,2,1]
assert ( list -= [2,4] ) == [1,1]
It is also possible to remove an element by passing its index to the remove
method, in which case the list is mutated:
def list = ['a','b','c','d','e','f','b','b','a']
assert list.remove(2) == 'c' // remove the third element, and return it
assert list == ['a','b','d','e','f','b','b','a']
In case you only want to remove the first element having the same value in a list, instead of removing all
elements, you can call the remove
method passing the value:
def list= ['a','b','c','b','b']
assert list.remove('c') // remove 'c', and return true because element removed
assert list.remove('b') // remove first 'b', and return true because element removed
assert ! list.remove('z') // return false because no elements removed
assert list == ['a','b','b']
As you can see, there are two remove
methods available. One that takes an integer and removes an element
by its index, and another that will remove the first element that matches the passed value. So what should we
do when we have a list of integers? In this case, you may wish to use removeAt
to remove an element by its
index, and removeElement
to remove the first element that matches a value.
def list = [1,2,3,4,5,6,2,2,1]
assert list.remove(2) == 3 // this removes the element at index 2, and returns it
assert list == [1,2,4,5,6,2,2,1]
assert list.removeElement(2) // remove first 2 and return true
assert list == [1,4,5,6,2,2,1]
assert ! list.removeElement(8) // return false because 8 is not in the list
assert list == [1,4,5,6,2,2,1]
assert list.removeAt(1) == 4 // remove element at index 1, and return it
assert list == [1,5,6,2,2,1]
Of course, removeAt
and removeElement
will work with lists of any type.
Additionally, removing all the elements in a list can be done by calling the clear
method:
def list= ['a',2,'c',4]
list.clear()
assert list == []
The Groovy development kit also includes methods making it easy to reason on sets:
assert 'a' in ['a','b','c'] // returns true if an element belongs to the list
assert ['a','b','c'].contains('a') // equivalent to the `contains` method in Java
assert [1,3,4].containsAll([1,4]) // `containsAll` will check that all elements are found
assert [1,2,3,3,3,3,4,5].count(3) == 4 // count the number of elements which have some value
assert [1,2,3,3,3,3,4,5].count {
it%2==0 // count the number of elements which match the predicate
} == 2
assert [1,2,4,6,8,10,12].intersect([1,3,6,9,12]) == [1,6,12]
assert [1,2,3].disjoint( [4,6,9] )
assert ![1,2,3].disjoint( [2,4,6] )
Working with collections often implies sorting. Groovy offers a variety of options to sort lists, from using closures to comparators, as in the following examples:
assert [6, 3, 9, 2, 7, 1, 5].sort() == [1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9]
def list = ['abc', 'z', 'xyzuvw', 'Hello', '321']
assert list.sort {
it.size()
} == ['z', 'abc', '321', 'Hello', 'xyzuvw']
def list2 = [7, 4, -6, -1, 11, 2, 3, -9, 5, -13]
assert list2.sort { a, b -> a == b ? 0 : Math.abs(a) < Math.abs(b) ? -1 : 1 } ==
[-1, 2, 3, 4, 5, -6, 7, -9, 11, -13]
Comparator mc = { a, b -> a == b ? 0 : Math.abs(a) < Math.abs(b) ? -1 : 1 }
// JDK 8+ only
// list2.sort(mc)
// assert list2 == [-1, 2, 3, 4, 5, -6, 7, -9, 11, -13]
def list3 = [6, -3, 9, 2, -7, 1, 5]
Collections.sort(list3)
assert list3 == [-7, -3, 1, 2, 5, 6, 9]
Collections.sort(list3, mc)
assert list3 == [1, 2, -3, 5, 6, -7, 9]
The Groovy development kit also takes advantage of operator overloading to provide methods allowing duplication of elements of a list:
assert [1, 2, 3] * 3 == [1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3]
assert [1, 2, 3].multiply(2) == [1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3]
assert Collections.nCopies(3, 'b') == ['b', 'b', 'b']
// nCopies from the JDK has different semantics than multiply for lists
assert Collections.nCopies(2, [1, 2]) == [[1, 2], [1, 2]] //not [1,2,1,2]
Maps
Map literals
In Groovy, maps (also known as associative arrays) can be created using the map literal syntax: [:]
:
def map = [name: 'Gromit', likes: 'cheese', id: 1234]
assert map.get('name') == 'Gromit'
assert map.get('id') == 1234
assert map['name'] == 'Gromit'
assert map['id'] == 1234
assert map instanceof java.util.Map
def emptyMap = [:]
assert emptyMap.size() == 0
emptyMap.put("foo", 5)
assert emptyMap.size() == 1
assert emptyMap.get("foo") == 5
Map keys are strings by default: [a:1]
is equivalent to ['a':1]
. This can be confusing if you define a variable
named a
and that you want the value of a
to be the key in your map. If this is the case, then you must escape
the key by adding parenthesis, like in the following example:
def a = 'Bob'
def ages = [a: 43]
assert ages['Bob'] == null // `Bob` is not found
assert ages['a'] == 43 // because `a` is a literal!
ages = [(a): 43] // now we escape `a` by using parenthesis
assert ages['Bob'] == 43 // and the value is found!
In addition to map literals, it is possible, to get a new copy of a map, to clone it:
def map = [
simple : 123,
complex: [a: 1, b: 2]
]
def map2 = map.clone()
assert map2.get('simple') == map.get('simple')
assert map2.get('complex') == map.get('complex')
map2.get('complex').put('c', 3)
assert map.get('complex').get('c') == 3
The resulting map is a shallow copy of the original one, as illustrated in the previous example.
Map property notation
Maps also act like beans so you can use the property notation to get/set
items inside the Map
as long as the keys are strings which are valid
Groovy identifiers:
def map = [name: 'Gromit', likes: 'cheese', id: 1234]
assert map.name == 'Gromit' // can be used instead of map.get('name')
assert map.id == 1234
def emptyMap = [:]
assert emptyMap.size() == 0
emptyMap.foo = 5
assert emptyMap.size() == 1
assert emptyMap.foo == 5
Note: by design map.foo
will always look for the key foo
in the map. This
means foo.class
will return null
on a map that doesn’t contain the class
key. Should you really want to know
the class, then you must use getClass()
:
def map = [name: 'Gromit', likes: 'cheese', id: 1234]
assert map.class == null
assert map.get('class') == null
assert map.getClass() == LinkedHashMap // this is probably what you want
map = [1 : 'a',
(true) : 'p',
(false): 'q',
(null) : 'x',
'null' : 'z']
assert map.containsKey(1) // 1 is not an identifier so used as is
assert map.true == null
assert map.false == null
assert map.get(true) == 'p'
assert map.get(false) == 'q'
assert map.null == 'z'
assert map.get(null) == 'x'
Iterating on maps
As usual in the Groovy development kit, idiomatic iteration on maps makes use of the each
and eachWithIndex
methods.
It’s worth noting that maps created using the map literal notation are ordered, that is to say that if you iterate
on map entries, it is guaranteed that the entries will be returned in the same order they were added in the map.
def map = [
Bob : 42,
Alice: 54,
Max : 33
]
// `entry` is a map entry
map.each { entry ->
println "Name: $entry.key Age: $entry.value"
}
// `entry` is a map entry, `i` the index in the map
map.eachWithIndex { entry, i ->
println "$i - Name: $entry.key Age: $entry.value"
}
// Alternatively you can use key and value directly
map.each { key, value ->
println "Name: $key Age: $value"
}
// Key, value and i as the index in the map
map.eachWithIndex { key, value, i ->
println "$i - Name: $key Age: $value"
}
Manipulating maps
Adding an element to a map can be done either using the put
method, the subscript operator or using putAll
:
def defaults = [1: 'a', 2: 'b', 3: 'c', 4: 'd']
def overrides = [2: 'z', 5: 'x', 13: 'x']
def result = new LinkedHashMap(defaults)
result.put(15, 't')
result[17] = 'u'
result.putAll(overrides)
assert result == [1: 'a', 2: 'z', 3: 'c', 4: 'd', 5: 'x', 13: 'x', 15: 't', 17: 'u']
Removing all the elements of a map can be done by calling the clear
method:
def m = [1:'a', 2:'b']
assert m.get(1) == 'a'
m.clear()
assert m == [:]
Maps generated using the map literal syntax are using the object equals
and hashcode
methods. This means that
you should never use an object which hash code is subject to change over time, or you wouldn’t be able to get
the associated value back.
It is also worth noting that you should never use a GString
as the key of a map, because the hash code of a GString
is not the same as the hash code of an equivalent String
:
def key = 'some key'
def map = [:]
def gstringKey = "${key.toUpperCase()}"
map.put(gstringKey,'value')
assert map.get('SOME KEY') == null
We can inspect the keys, values, and entries in a view:
def map = [1:'a', 2:'b', 3:'c']
def entries = map.entrySet()
entries.each { entry ->
assert entry.key in [1,2,3]
assert entry.value in ['a','b','c']
}
def keys = map.keySet()
assert keys == [1,2,3] as Set
Mutating values returned by the view (be it a map entry, a key or a value) is highly discouraged because success
of the operation directly depends on the type of the map being manipulated. In particular, Groovy relies on collections
from the JDK that in general make no guarantee that a collection can safely be manipulated through keySet
, entrySet
, or
values
.
The Groovy development kit contains filtering, searching and collecting methods similar to those found for lists:
def people = [
1: [name:'Bob', age: 32, gender: 'M'],
2: [name:'Johnny', age: 36, gender: 'M'],
3: [name:'Claire', age: 21, gender: 'F'],
4: [name:'Amy', age: 54, gender:'F']
]
def bob = people.find { it.value.name == 'Bob' } // find a single entry
def females = people.findAll { it.value.gender == 'F' }
// both return entries, but you can use collect to retrieve the ages for example
def ageOfBob = bob.value.age
def agesOfFemales = females.collect {
it.value.age
}
assert ageOfBob == 32
assert agesOfFemales == [21,54]
// but you could also use a key/pair value as the parameters of the closures
def agesOfMales = people.findAll { id, person ->
person.gender == 'M'
}.collect { id, person ->
person.age
}
assert agesOfMales == [32, 36]
// `every` returns true if all entries match the predicate
assert people.every { id, person ->
person.age > 18
}
// `any` returns true if any entry matches the predicate
assert people.any { id, person ->
person.age == 54
}
We can group a list into a map using some criteria:
assert ['a', 7, 'b', [2, 3]].groupBy {
it.class
} == [(String) : ['a', 'b'],
(Integer) : [7],
(ArrayList): [[2, 3]]
]
assert [
[name: 'Clark', city: 'London'], [name: 'Sharma', city: 'London'],
[name: 'Maradona', city: 'LA'], [name: 'Zhang', city: 'HK'],
[name: 'Ali', city: 'HK'], [name: 'Liu', city: 'HK'],
].groupBy { it.city } == [
London: [[name: 'Clark', city: 'London'],
[name: 'Sharma', city: 'London']],
LA : [[name: 'Maradona', city: 'LA']],
HK : [[name: 'Zhang', city: 'HK'],
[name: 'Ali', city: 'HK'],
[name: 'Liu', city: 'HK']],
]
Ranges
Ranges allow you to create a list of sequential values. These can be
used as List
since
Range extends
java.util.List.
Ranges defined with the ..
notation are inclusive (that is the list
contains the from and to value).
Ranges defined with the ..<
notation are half-open, they include the
first value but not the last value.
// an inclusive range
def range = 5..8
assert range.size() == 4
assert range.get(2) == 7
assert range[2] == 7
assert range instanceof java.util.List
assert range.contains(5)
assert range.contains(8)
// lets use a half-open range
range = 5..<8
assert range.size() == 3
assert range.get(2) == 7
assert range[2] == 7
assert range instanceof java.util.List
assert range.contains(5)
assert !range.contains(8)
//get the end points of the range without using indexes
range = 1..10
assert range.from == 1
assert range.to == 10
Note that int ranges are implemented efficiently, creating a lightweight Java object containing a from and to value.
Ranges can be used for any Java object which implements java.lang.Comparable
for comparison and also have methods next()
and previous()
to return the
next / previous item in the range. For example, you can create a range of String
elements:
// an inclusive range
def range = 'a'..'d'
assert range.size() == 4
assert range.get(2) == 'c'
assert range[2] == 'c'
assert range instanceof java.util.List
assert range.contains('a')
assert range.contains('d')
assert !range.contains('e')
You can iterate on a range using a classic for
loop:
for (i in 1..10) {
println "Hello ${i}"
}
but alternatively you can achieve the same effect in a more Groovy idiomatic style, by iterating a range
with each
method:
(1..10).each { i ->
println "Hello ${i}"
}
Ranges can be also used in the switch
statement:
switch (years) {
case 1..10: interestRate = 0.076; break;
case 11..25: interestRate = 0.052; break;
default: interestRate = 0.037;
}
Syntax enhancements for collections
GPath support
Thanks to the support of property notation for both lists and maps, Groovy provides syntactic sugar making it really easy to deal with nested collections, as illustrated in the following examples:
def listOfMaps = [['a': 11, 'b': 12], ['a': 21, 'b': 22]]
assert listOfMaps.a == [11, 21] //GPath notation
assert listOfMaps*.a == [11, 21] //spread dot notation
listOfMaps = [['a': 11, 'b': 12], ['a': 21, 'b': 22], null]
assert listOfMaps*.a == [11, 21, null] // caters for null values
assert listOfMaps*.a == listOfMaps.collect { it?.a } //equivalent notation
// But this will only collect non-null values
assert listOfMaps.a == [11,21]
Spread operator
The spread operator can be used to "inline" a collection into another. It is syntactic sugar which often avoids calls
to putAll
and facilitates the realization of one-liners:
assert [ 'z': 900,
*: ['a': 100, 'b': 200], 'a': 300] == ['a': 300, 'b': 200, 'z': 900]
//spread map notation in map definition
assert [*: [3: 3, *: [5: 5]], 7: 7] == [3: 3, 5: 5, 7: 7]
def f = { [1: 'u', 2: 'v', 3: 'w'] }
assert [*: f(), 10: 'zz'] == [1: 'u', 10: 'zz', 2: 'v', 3: 'w']
//spread map notation in function arguments
f = { map -> map.c }
assert f(*: ['a': 10, 'b': 20, 'c': 30], 'e': 50) == 30
f = { m, i, j, k -> [m, i, j, k] }
//using spread map notation with mixed unnamed and named arguments
assert f('e': 100, *[4, 5], *: ['a': 10, 'b': 20, 'c': 30], 6) ==
[["e": 100, "b": 20, "c": 30, "a": 10], 4, 5, 6]
The star-dot `*.' operator
The "star-dot" operator is a shortcut operator allowing you to call a method or a property on all elements of a collection:
assert [1, 3, 5] == ['a', 'few', 'words']*.size()
class Person {
String name
int age
}
def persons = [new Person(name:'Hugo', age:17), new Person(name:'Sandra',age:19)]
assert [17, 19] == persons*.age
Slicing with the subscript operator
You can index into lists, arrays, maps using the subscript expression. It is interesting that strings are considered as special kinds of collections in that context:
def text = 'nice cheese gromit!'
def x = text[2]
assert x == 'c'
assert x.class == String
def sub = text[5..10]
assert sub == 'cheese'
def list = [10, 11, 12, 13]
def answer = list[2,3]
assert answer == [12,13]
Notice that you can use ranges to extract part of a collection:
list = 100..200
sub = list[1, 3, 20..25, 33]
assert sub == [101, 103, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 133]
The subscript operator can be used to update an existing collection (for collection type which are not immutable):
list = ['a','x','x','d']
list[1..2] = ['b','c']
assert list == ['a','b','c','d']
It is worth noting that negative indices are allowed, to extract more easily from the end of a collection:
text = "nice cheese gromit!"
x = text[-1]
assert x == "!"
You can use negative indices to count from the end of the List, array, String etc.
def name = text[-7..-2]
assert name == "gromit"
Eventually, if you use a backwards range (the starting index is greater than the end index), then the answer is reversed.
text = "nice cheese gromit!"
name = text[3..1]
assert name == "eci"
Enhanced Collection Methods
In addition to lists, maps or ranges, Groovy offers a lot of additional methods for filtering, collecting, grouping, counting, … which are directly available on either collections or more easily iterables.
In particular, we invite you to read the Groovy development kit API docs and specifically:
3.3.3. Working with legacy Date/Calendar types
The groovy-dateutil
module supports numerous extensions for working with
Java’s classic Date
and Calendar
classes.
You can access the properties of a Date
or Calendar
using the normal array index notation
with the constant field numbers from the Calendar
class as shown in the following example:
import static java.util.Calendar.* (1)
def cal = Calendar.instance
cal[YEAR] = 2000 (2)
cal[MONTH] = JANUARY (2)
cal[DAY_OF_MONTH] = 1 (2)
assert cal[DAY_OF_WEEK] == SATURDAY (3)
1 | Import the constants |
2 | Setting the calendar’s year, month and day of month |
3 | Accessing the calendar’s day of week |
Groovy supports arithmetic on and iteration between Date
and Calendar
instances as shown in the following example:
def utc = TimeZone.getTimeZone('UTC')
Date date = Date.parse("yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm", "2010-05-23 09:01", utc)
def prev = date - 1
def next = date + 1
def diffInDays = next - prev
assert diffInDays == 2
int count = 0
prev.upto(next) { count++ }
assert count == 3
You can parse strings into dates and output dates into formatted strings:
def orig = '2000-01-01'
def newYear = Date.parse('yyyy-MM-dd', orig)
assert newYear[DAY_OF_WEEK] == SATURDAY
assert newYear.format('yyyy-MM-dd') == orig
assert newYear.format('dd/MM/yyyy') == '01/01/2000'
You can also create a new Date or Calendar based on an existing one:
def newYear = Date.parse('yyyy-MM-dd', '2000-01-01')
def newYearsEve = newYear.copyWith(
year: 1999,
month: DECEMBER,
dayOfMonth: 31
)
assert newYearsEve[DAY_OF_WEEK] == FRIDAY
3.3.4. Working with Date/Time types
The groovy-datetime
module supports numerous extensions for working with
the Date/Time API
introduced in Java 8. This documentation refers to the data types defined by this API as
"JSR 310 types."
Formatting and parsing
A common use case when working with date/time types is to convert them to Strings (formatting) and from Strings (parsing). Groovy provides these additional formatting methods:
Method | Description | Example |
---|---|---|
|
For |
|
For |
|
|
For |
|
|
|
For |
|
For |
|
|
For |
|
|
|
For |
|
For |
|
|
For |
|
|
|
For |
|
For |
|
|
For |
|
|
|
Formats with
|
|
For parsing, Groovy adds a static parse
method to many of the JSR 310 types. The method
takes two arguments: the value to be formatted and the pattern to use. The pattern is
defined by the
java.time.format.DateTimeFormatter
API.
As an example:
def date = LocalDate.parse('Jun 3, 04', 'MMM d, yy')
assert date == LocalDate.of(2004, Month.JUNE, 3)
def time = LocalTime.parse('4:45', 'H:mm')
assert time == LocalTime.of(4, 45, 0)
def offsetTime = OffsetTime.parse('09:47:51-1234', 'HH:mm:ssZ')
assert offsetTime == OffsetTime.of(9, 47, 51, 0, ZoneOffset.ofHoursMinutes(-12, -34))
def dateTime = ZonedDateTime.parse('2017/07/11 9:47PM Pacific Standard Time', 'yyyy/MM/dd h:mma zzzz')
assert dateTime == ZonedDateTime.of(
LocalDate.of(2017, 7, 11),
LocalTime.of(21, 47, 0),
ZoneId.of('America/Los_Angeles')
)
Note that these parse
methods have a different argument ordering than the static
parse
method Groovy added to java.util.Date
.
This was done to be consistent with the existing parse
methods of the Date/Time API.
Manipulating date/time
Addition and subtraction
Temporal
types have plus
and minus
methods for adding or subtracting a provided
java.time.temporal.TemporalAmount
argument. Because Groovy maps the +
and -
operators
to single-argument methods of these names, a more natural expression syntax can be used to add and subtract.
def aprilFools = LocalDate.of(2018, Month.APRIL, 1)
def nextAprilFools = aprilFools + Period.ofDays(365) // add 365 days
assert nextAprilFools.year == 2019
def idesOfMarch = aprilFools - Period.ofDays(17) // subtract 17 days
assert idesOfMarch.dayOfMonth == 15
assert idesOfMarch.month == Month.MARCH
Groovy provides additional plus
and minus
methods that accept an integer argument,
enabling the above to be rewritten more succinctly:
def nextAprilFools = aprilFools + 365 // add 365 days
def idesOfMarch = aprilFools - 17 // subtract 17 days
The unit of these integers depends on the JSR 310 type operand. As evident above,
integers used with ChronoLocalDate
types like LocalDate
have a unit of
days.
Integers used with Year
and YearMonth
have a unit of
years and
months, respectively.
All other types have a unit of
seconds,
such as LocalTime
, for instance:
def mars = LocalTime.of(12, 34, 56) // 12:34:56 pm
def thirtySecondsToMars = mars - 30 // go back 30 seconds
assert thirtySecondsToMars.second == 26
Multiplication and division
The *
operator can be used to multiply Period
and Duration
instances by an
integer value; the /
operator can be used to divide Duration
instances by an integer value.
def period = Period.ofMonths(1) * 2 // a 1-month period times 2
assert period.months == 2
def duration = Duration.ofSeconds(10) / 5// a 10-second duration divided by 5
assert duration.seconds == 2
Incrementing and decrementing
The ++
and --
operators can be used increment and decrement date/time values by one unit. Since the JSR 310 types
are immutable, the operation will create a new instance with the incremented/decremented value and reassign it to the
reference.
def year = Year.of(2000)
--year // decrement by one year
assert year.value == 1999
def offsetTime = OffsetTime.of(0, 0, 0, 0, ZoneOffset.UTC) // 00:00:00.000 UTC
offsetTime++ // increment by one second
assert offsetTime.second == 1
Interacting with date/time values
Property notation
The
getLong(TemporalField)
method of TemporalAccessor
types (e.g. LocalDate
,
LocalTime
, ZonedDateTime
, etc.) and the
get(TemporalUnit)
method of TemporalAmount
types (namely Period
and Duration
), can be invoked with
Groovy’s property notation. For example:
def date = LocalDate.of(2018, Month.MARCH, 12)
assert date[ChronoField.YEAR] == 2018
assert date[ChronoField.MONTH_OF_YEAR] == Month.MARCH.value
assert date[ChronoField.DAY_OF_MONTH] == 12
assert date[ChronoField.DAY_OF_WEEK] == DayOfWeek.MONDAY.value
def period = Period.ofYears(2).withMonths(4).withDays(6)
assert period[ChronoUnit.YEARS] == 2
assert period[ChronoUnit.MONTHS] == 4
assert period[ChronoUnit.DAYS] == 6
Ranges, upto
, and downto
The JSR 310 types can be used with the range operator.
The following example iterates between today and the LocalDate
six days from now,
printing out the day of the week for each iteration. As both range bounds are inclusive,
this prints all seven days of the week.
def start = LocalDate.now()
def end = start + 6 // 6 days later
(start..end).each { date ->
println date.dayOfWeek
}
The upto
method will accomplish the same as the range in the above example.
The upto
method iterates from the earlier start
value (inclusive) to the later end
value
(also inclusive), calling the closure with the incremented next
value once per iteration.
def start = LocalDate.now()
def end = start + 6 // 6 days later
start.upto(end) { next ->
println next.dayOfWeek
}
The downto
method iterates in the opposite direction, from a later start
value
to an earlier end
value.
The unit of iteration for upto
, downto
, and ranges is the same as the unit for addition
and subtraction: LocalDate
iterates by one day at a time,
YearMonth
iterates by one month, Year
by one year, and everything else by one second.
Both methods also support an optional a TemporalUnit
argument to change the unit of
iteration.
Consider the following example, where March 1st, 2018 is iterated up to March 2nd, 2018 using an iteration unit of months.
def start = LocalDate.of(2018, Month.MARCH, 1)
def end = start + 1 // 1 day later
int iterationCount = 0
start.upto(end, ChronoUnit.MONTHS) { next ->
println next
++iterationCount
}
assert iterationCount == 1
Since the start
date is inclusive, the closure is called with a next
date value of March 1st.
The upto
method then increments the date by one month, yielding the date, April 1st.
Because this date is after the specified end
date of March 2nd, the iteration stops immediately,
having only called the closure once. This behavior is the same for the downto
method except that
the iteration will stop as soon as the value of next
becomes earlier than the targeted end
date.
In short, when iterating with the upto
or downto
methods with a custom unit of iteration,
the current value of iteration will never exceed the end value.
Combining date/time values
The left-shift operator (<<
) can be used to combine two JSR 310 types into an aggregate type.
For example, a LocalDate
can be left-shifted into a LocalTime
to produce a composite
LocalDateTime
instance.
MonthDay monthDay = Month.JUNE << 3 // June 3rd
LocalDate date = monthDay << Year.of(2015) // 3-Jun-2015
LocalDateTime dateTime = date << LocalTime.NOON // 3-Jun-2015 @ 12pm
OffsetDateTime offsetDateTime = dateTime << ZoneOffset.ofHours(-5) // 3-Jun-2015 @ 12pm UTC-5
The left-shift operator is reflexive; the order of the operands does not matter.
def year = Year.of(2000)
def month = Month.DECEMBER
YearMonth a = year << month
YearMonth b = month << year
assert a == b
Creating periods and durations
The right-shift operator (>>
) produces a value representing the period or duration between the
operands. For ChronoLocalDate
, YearMonth
, and Year
, the operator yields
a Period
instance:
def newYears = LocalDate.of(2018, Month.JANUARY, 1)
def aprilFools = LocalDate.of(2018, Month.APRIL, 1)
def period = newYears >> aprilFools
assert period instanceof Period
assert period.months == 3
The operator produces a Duration
for the time-aware JSR types:
def duration = LocalTime.NOON >> (LocalTime.NOON + 30)
assert duration instanceof Duration
assert duration.seconds == 30
If the value on the left-hand side of the operator is earlier than the value on the right-hand side, the result is positive. If the left-hand side is later than the right-hand side, the result is negative:
def decade = Year.of(2010) >> Year.of(2000)
assert decade.years == -10
Converting between legacy and JSR 310 types
Despite the shortcomings of Date
, Calendar
, and TimeZone
types in the java.util
package
they are farily common in Java APIs (at least in those prior to Java 8).
To accommodate use of such APIs, Groovy provides methods for converting between the
JSR 310 types and legacy types.
Most JSR types have been fitted with toDate()
and toCalendar()
methods for
converting to relatively equivalent java.util.Date
and java.util.Calendar
values.
Both ZoneId
and ZoneOffset
have been given a toTimeZone()
method for converting to
java.util.TimeZone
.
// LocalDate to java.util.Date
def valentines = LocalDate.of(2018, Month.FEBRUARY, 14)
assert valentines.toDate().format('MMMM dd, yyyy') == 'February 14, 2018'
// LocalTime to java.util.Date
def noon = LocalTime.of(12, 0, 0)
assert noon.toDate().format('HH:mm:ss') == '12:00:00'
// ZoneId to java.util.TimeZone
def newYork = ZoneId.of('America/New_York')
assert newYork.toTimeZone() == TimeZone.getTimeZone('America/New_York')
// ZonedDateTime to java.util.Calendar
def valAtNoonInNY = ZonedDateTime.of(valentines, noon, newYork)
assert valAtNoonInNY.toCalendar().getTimeZone().toZoneId() == newYork
Note that when converting to a legacy type:
-
Nanosecond values are truncated to milliseconds. A
LocalTime
, for example, with aChronoUnit.NANOS
value of 999,999,999 nanoseconds translates to 999 milliseconds. -
When converting the "local" types (
LocalDate
,LocalTime
, andLocalDateTime
), the time zone of the returnedDate
orCalendar
will be the system default. -
When converting a time-only type (
LocalTime
orOffsetTime
), the year/month/day of theDate
orCalendar
is set to the current date. -
When converting a date-only type (
LocalDate
), the time value of theDate
orCalendar
will be cleared, i.e.00:00:00.000
. -
When converting an
OffsetDateTime
to aCalendar
, only the hours and minutes of theZoneOffset
convey into the correspondingTimeZone
. Fortunately, Zone Offsets with non-zero seconds are rare.
Groovy has added a number of methods to Date
and Calendar
for converting into the various JSR 310 types:
Date legacy = Date.parse('yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.SSS', '2010-04-03 10:30:58.999')
assert legacy.toLocalDate() == LocalDate.of(2010, 4, 3)
assert legacy.toLocalTime() == LocalTime.of(10, 30, 58, 999_000_000) // 999M ns = 999ms
assert legacy.toOffsetTime().hour == 10
assert legacy.toYear() == Year.of(2010)
assert legacy.toMonth() == Month.APRIL
assert legacy.toDayOfWeek() == DayOfWeek.SATURDAY
assert legacy.toMonthDay() == MonthDay.of(Month.APRIL, 3)
assert legacy.toYearMonth() == YearMonth.of(2010, Month.APRIL)
assert legacy.toLocalDateTime().year == 2010
assert legacy.toOffsetDateTime().dayOfMonth == 3
assert legacy.toZonedDateTime().zone == ZoneId.systemDefault()
3.3.5. Handy utilities
ConfigSlurper
ConfigSlurper
is a utility class for reading configuration files defined in the form of Groovy scripts. Like it is
the case with Java *.properties
files, ConfigSlurper
allows a dot notation. But in addition, it allows for Closure scoped
configuration values and arbitrary object types.
def config = new ConfigSlurper().parse('''
app.date = new Date() (1)
app.age = 42
app { (2)
name = "Test${42}"
}
''')
assert config.app.date instanceof Date
assert config.app.age == 42
assert config.app.name == 'Test42'
1 | Usage of the dot notation |
2 | Usage of Closure scopes as an alternative to the dot notation |
As can be seen in the above example, the parse
method can be used to retrieve groovy.util.ConfigObject
instances. The
ConfigObject
is a specialized java.util.Map
implementation that either returns the configured value or a new ConfigObject
instance but never null
.
def config = new ConfigSlurper().parse('''
app.date = new Date()
app.age = 42
app.name = "Test${42}"
''')
assert config.test != null (1)
1 | config.test has not been specified yet it returns a ConfigObject when being called. |
In the case of a dot being part of a configuration variable name, it can be escaped by using single or double quotes.
def config = new ConfigSlurper().parse('''
app."person.age" = 42
''')
assert config.app."person.age" == 42
In addition, ConfigSlurper
comes with support for environments
. The environments
method can be used to hand over
a Closure instance that itself may consist of a several sections. Let’s say we wanted to create a particular configuration
value for the development environment. When creating the ConfigSlurper
instance we can use the ConfigSlurper(String)
constructor to specify the target environment.
def config = new ConfigSlurper('development').parse('''
environments {
development {
app.port = 8080
}
test {
app.port = 8082
}
production {
app.port = 80
}
}
''')
assert config.app.port == 8080
The ConfigSlurper environments aren’t restricted to any particular environment names. It solely depends on the
ConfigSlurper client code what value are supported and interpreted accordingly.
|
The environments
method is built-in but the registerConditionalBlock
method can be used to register other method names
in addition to the environments
name.
def slurper = new ConfigSlurper()
slurper.registerConditionalBlock('myProject', 'developers') (1)
def config = slurper.parse('''
sendMail = true
myProject {
developers {
sendMail = false
}
}
''')
assert !config.sendMail
1 | Once the new block is registered ConfigSlurper can parse it. |
For Java integration purposes the toProperties
method can be used to convert the ConfigObject
to a java.util.Properties
object that might be stored to a *.properties
text file. Be aware though that the configuration values are converted to
String
instances during adding them to the newly created Properties
instance.
def config = new ConfigSlurper().parse('''
app.date = new Date()
app.age = 42
app {
name = "Test${42}"
}
''')
def properties = config.toProperties()
assert properties."app.date" instanceof String
assert properties."app.age" == '42'
assert properties."app.name" == 'Test42'
Expando
The Expando
class can be used to create a dynamically expandable object. Despite its name it does not use the
ExpandoMetaClass
underneath. Each Expando
object represents a standalone, dynamically-crafted instance that can be
extended with properties (or methods) at runtime.
def expando = new Expando()
expando.name = 'John'
assert expando.name == 'John'
A special case occurs when a dynamic property registers a Closure
code block. Once being registered it can be invoked
as it would be done with a method call.
def expando = new Expando()
expando.toString = { -> 'John' }
expando.say = { String s -> "John says: ${s}" }
assert expando as String == 'John'
assert expando.say('Hi') == 'John says: Hi'
Observable list, map and set
Groovy comes with observable lists, maps and sets. Each of these collections trigger java.beans.PropertyChangeEvent
events when elements
are added, removed or changed. Note that a PropertyChangeEvent
is not only signalling that a certain event has
occurred, moreover, it holds information on the property name and the old/new value a certain property has been changed to.
Depending on the type of change that has happened, observable collections might fire more specialized PropertyChangeEvent
types. For example, adding an element to an observable list fires an ObservableList.ElementAddedEvent
event.
def event (1)
def listener = {
if (it instanceof ObservableList.ElementEvent) { (2)
event = it
}
} as PropertyChangeListener
def observable = [1, 2, 3] as ObservableList (3)
observable.addPropertyChangeListener(listener) (4)
observable.add 42 (5)
assert event instanceof ObservableList.ElementAddedEvent
def elementAddedEvent = event as ObservableList.ElementAddedEvent
assert elementAddedEvent.changeType == ObservableList.ChangeType.ADDED
assert elementAddedEvent.index == 3
assert elementAddedEvent.oldValue == null
assert elementAddedEvent.newValue == 42
1 | Declares a PropertyChangeEventListener that is capturing the fired events |
2 | ObservableList.ElementEvent and its descendant types are relevant for this listener |
3 | Registers the listener |
4 | Creates an ObservableList from the given list |
5 | Triggers an ObservableList.ElementAddedEvent event |
Be aware that adding an element in fact causes two events to be triggered. The first is of type ObservableList.ElementAddedEvent ,
the second is a plain PropertyChangeEvent that informs listeners about the change of property size .
|
The ObservableList.ElementClearedEvent
event type is another interesting one. Whenever multiple
elements are removed, for example when calling clear()
, it holds the elements being removed from the list.
def event
def listener = {
if (it instanceof ObservableList.ElementEvent) {
event = it
}
} as PropertyChangeListener
def observable = [1, 2, 3] as ObservableList
observable.addPropertyChangeListener(listener)
observable.clear()
assert event instanceof ObservableList.ElementClearedEvent
def elementClearedEvent = event as ObservableList.ElementClearedEvent
assert elementClearedEvent.values == [1, 2, 3]
assert observable.size() == 0
To get an overview of all the supported event types the reader is encouraged to have a look at the JavaDoc documentation or the source code of the observable collection in use.
ObservableMap
and ObservableSet
come with the same concepts as we have seen for ObservableList
in this section.
3.4. Metaprogramming
The Groovy language supports two flavors of metaprogramming: runtime and compile-time. The first allows altering the class model and the behavior of a program at runtime while the second only occurs at compile-time. Both have pros and cons that we will detail in this section.
3.4.1. Runtime metaprogramming
With runtime metaprogramming we can postpone to runtime the decision to intercept, inject and even synthesize methods of classes and interfaces. For a deep understanding of Groovy’s metaobject protocol (MOP) we need to understand Groovy objects and Groovy’s method handling. In Groovy we work with three kinds of objects: POJO, POGO and Groovy Interceptors. Groovy allows metaprogramming for all types of objects but in a different manner.
-
POJO - A regular Java object whose class can be written in Java or any other language for the JVM.
-
POGO - A Groovy object whose class is written in Groovy. It extends
java.lang.Object
and implements the groovy.lang.GroovyObject interface by default. -
Groovy Interceptor - A Groovy object that implements the groovy.lang.GroovyInterceptable interface and has method-interception capability which is discussed in the GroovyInterceptable section.
For every method call Groovy checks whether the object is a POJO or a POGO. For POJOs, Groovy fetches its MetaClass
from the groovy.lang.MetaClassRegistry and delegates method invocation to it. For POGOs, Groovy takes more steps, as illustrated in the following figure:
GroovyObject interface
groovy.lang.GroovyObject is the main interface in Groovy as the Object
class is in Java. GroovyObject
has a default implementation in the groovy.lang.GroovyObjectSupport class and it is responsible to transfer invocation to the groovy.lang.MetaClass object. The GroovyObject
source looks like this:
package groovy.lang;
public interface GroovyObject {
Object invokeMethod(String name, Object args);
Object getProperty(String propertyName);
void setProperty(String propertyName, Object newValue);
MetaClass getMetaClass();
void setMetaClass(MetaClass metaClass);
}
invokeMethod
This method is primarily intended to be used in conjunction with the GroovyInterceptable
interface or an object’s MetaClass
where it will intercept all method calls.
It is also invoked when the method called is not present on a Groovy object. Here is a simple example using an
overridden invokeMethod()
method:
class SomeGroovyClass {
def invokeMethod(String name, Object args) {
return "called invokeMethod $name $args"
}
def test() {
return 'method exists'
}
}
def someGroovyClass = new SomeGroovyClass()
assert someGroovyClass.test() == 'method exists'
assert someGroovyClass.someMethod() == 'called invokeMethod someMethod []'
However, the use of invokeMethod
to intercept missing methods is discouraged. In cases where the intent is to only
intercept method calls in the case of a failed method dispatch use methodMissing
instead.
get/setProperty
Every read access to a property can be intercepted by overriding the getProperty()
method of the current object.
Here is a simple example:
class SomeGroovyClass {
def property1 = 'ha'
def field2 = 'ho'
def field4 = 'hu'
def getField1() {
return 'getHa'
}
def getProperty(String name) {
if (name != 'field3')
return metaClass.getProperty(this, name) (1)
else
return 'field3'
}
}
def someGroovyClass = new SomeGroovyClass()
assert someGroovyClass.field1 == 'getHa'
assert someGroovyClass.field2 == 'ho'
assert someGroovyClass.field3 == 'field3'
assert someGroovyClass.field4 == 'hu'
1 | Forwards the request to the getter for all properties except field3 . |
You can intercept write access to properties by overriding the setProperty()
method:
class POGO {
String property
void setProperty(String name, Object value) {
this.@"$name" = 'overridden'
}
}
def pogo = new POGO()
pogo.property = 'a'
assert pogo.property == 'overridden'
get/setMetaClass
You can access an object’s metaClass
or set your own MetaClass
implementation for changing the default interception mechanism. For example, you can write your own implementation of the MetaClass
interface and assign it to objects in order to change the interception mechanism:
// getMetaclass
someObject.metaClass
// setMetaClass
someObject.metaClass = new OwnMetaClassImplementation()
You can find an additional example in the GroovyInterceptable topic. |
get/setAttribute
This functionality is related to the MetaClass
implementation. In the default implementation you can access fields without invoking their getters and setters. The examples below demonstrates this approach:
class SomeGroovyClass {
def field1 = 'ha'
def field2 = 'ho'
def getField1() {
return 'getHa'
}
}
def someGroovyClass = new SomeGroovyClass()
assert someGroovyClass.metaClass.getAttribute(someGroovyClass, 'field1') == 'ha'
assert someGroovyClass.metaClass.getAttribute(someGroovyClass, 'field2') == 'ho'
class POGO {
private String field
String property1
void setProperty1(String property1) {
this.property1 = "setProperty1"
}
}
def pogo = new POGO()
pogo.metaClass.setAttribute(pogo, 'field', 'ha')
pogo.metaClass.setAttribute(pogo, 'property1', 'ho')
assert pogo.field == 'ha'
assert pogo.property1 == 'ho'
methodMissing
Groovy supports the concept of methodMissing
. This method differs from invokeMethod
in that it
is only invoked in the case of a failed method dispatch when no method can be found for the given name and/or the
given arguments:
class Foo {
def methodMissing(String name, def args) {
return "this is me"
}
}
assert new Foo().someUnknownMethod(42l) == 'this is me'
Typically when using methodMissing
it is possible to cache the result for the next time the same method is called.
For example, consider dynamic finders in GORM. These are implemented in terms of methodMissing
. The code resembles
something like this:
class GORM {
def dynamicMethods = [...] // an array of dynamic methods that use regex
def methodMissing(String name, args) {
def method = dynamicMethods.find { it.match(name) }
if(method) {
GORM.metaClass."$name" = { Object[] varArgs ->
method.invoke(delegate, name, varArgs)
}
return method.invoke(delegate,name, args)
}
else throw new MissingMethodException(name, delegate, args)
}
}
Notice how, if we find a method to invoke, we then dynamically register a new method on the fly using ExpandoMetaClass.
This is so that the next time the same method is called it is more efficient. This way of using methodMissing
does not have
the overhead of invokeMethod
and is not expensive from the second call on.
propertyMissing
Groovy supports the concept of propertyMissing
for intercepting otherwise failing property resolution attempts. In the
case of a getter method, propertyMissing
takes a single String
argument containing the property name:
class Foo {
def propertyMissing(String name) { name }
}
assert new Foo().boo == 'boo'
The propertyMissing(String)
method is only called when no getter method for the given property can be found by the Groovy
runtime.
For setter methods a second propertyMissing
definition can be added that takes an additional value argument:
class Foo {
def storage = [:]
def propertyMissing(String name, value) { storage[name] = value }
def propertyMissing(String name) { storage[name] }
}
def f = new Foo()
f.foo = "bar"
assert f.foo == "bar"
As with methodMissing
it is best practice to dynamically register new properties at runtime to improve the overall lookup
performance.
static methodMissing
Static variant of methodMissing
method can be added via the ExpandoMetaClass
or can be implemented at the class level with $static_methodMissing
method.
class Foo {
static def $static_methodMissing(String name, Object args) {
return "Missing static method name is $name"
}
}
assert Foo.bar() == 'Missing static method name is bar'
static propertyMissing
Static variant of propertyMissing
method can be added via the ExpandoMetaClass
or can be implemented at the class level with $static_propertyMissing
method.
class Foo {
static def $static_propertyMissing(String name) {
return "Missing static property name is $name"
}
}
assert Foo.foobar == 'Missing static property name is foobar'
GroovyInterceptable
The groovy.lang.GroovyInterceptable interface is marker interface that extends GroovyObject
and is used to notify the Groovy runtime that all methods should be intercepted through the method dispatcher mechanism of the Groovy runtime.
package groovy.lang;
public interface GroovyInterceptable extends GroovyObject {
}
When a Groovy object implements the GroovyInterceptable
interface, its invokeMethod()
is called for any method calls. Below you can see a simple example of an object of this type:
class Interception implements GroovyInterceptable {
def definedMethod() { }
def invokeMethod(String name, Object args) {
'invokedMethod'
}
}
The next piece of code is a test which shows that both calls to existing and non-existing methods will return the same value.
class InterceptableTest extends GroovyTestCase {
void testCheckInterception() {
def interception = new Interception()
assert interception.definedMethod() == 'invokedMethod'
assert interception.someMethod() == 'invokedMethod'
}
}
We cannot use default groovy methods like println because these methods are injected into all Groovy objects so they will be intercepted too.
|
If we want to intercept all method calls but do not want to implement the GroovyInterceptable
interface we can implement invokeMethod()
on an object’s MetaClass
.
This approach works for both POGOs and POJOs, as shown by this example:
class InterceptionThroughMetaClassTest extends GroovyTestCase {
void testPOJOMetaClassInterception() {
String invoking = 'ha'
invoking.metaClass.invokeMethod = { String name, Object args ->
'invoked'
}
assert invoking.length() == 'invoked'
assert invoking.someMethod() == 'invoked'
}
void testPOGOMetaClassInterception() {
Entity entity = new Entity('Hello')
entity.metaClass.invokeMethod = { String name, Object args ->
'invoked'
}
assert entity.build(new Object()) == 'invoked'
assert entity.someMethod() == 'invoked'
}
}
Additional information about MetaClass can be found in the MetaClasses section.
|
Categories
There are situations where it is useful if a class not under control had additional methods. In order to enable this capability, Groovy implements a feature borrowed from Objective-C, called Categories.
Categories are implemented with so-called category classes. A category class is special in that it needs to meet certain pre-defined rules for defining extension methods.
There are a few categories that are included in the system for adding functionality to classes that make them more usable within the Groovy environment:
Category classes aren’t enabled by default. To use the methods defined in a category class it is necessary to apply
the scoped use
method that is provided by the GDK and available from inside every Groovy object instance:
use(TimeCategory) {
println 1.minute.from.now (1)
println 10.hours.ago
def someDate = new Date() (2)
println someDate - 3.months
}
1 | TimeCategory adds methods to Integer |
2 | TimeCategory adds methods to Date |
The use
method takes the category class as its first parameter and a closure code block as second parameter. Inside the
Closure
access to the category methods is available. As can be seen in the example above even JDK classes
like java.lang.Integer
or java.util.Date
can be enriched with user-defined methods.
A category needs not to be directly exposed to the user code, the following will also do:
class JPACategory{
// Let's enhance JPA EntityManager without getting into the JSR committee
static void persistAll(EntityManager em , Object[] entities) { //add an interface to save all
entities?.each { em.persist(it) }
}
}
def transactionContext = {
EntityManager em, Closure c ->
def tx = em.transaction
try {
tx.begin()
use(JPACategory) {
c()
}
tx.commit()
} catch (e) {
tx.rollback()
} finally {
//cleanup your resource here
}
}
// user code, they always forget to close resource in exception, some even forget to commit, let's not rely on them.
EntityManager em; //probably injected
transactionContext (em) {
em.persistAll(obj1, obj2, obj3)
// let's do some logics here to make the example sensible
em.persistAll(obj2, obj4, obj6)
}
When we have a look at the groovy.time.TimeCategory
class we see that the extension methods are all declared as static
methods. In fact, this is one of the requirements that must be met by category classes for its methods to be successfully added to
a class inside the use
code block:
public class TimeCategory {
public static Date plus(final Date date, final BaseDuration duration) {
return duration.plus(date);
}
public static Date minus(final Date date, final BaseDuration duration) {
final Calendar cal = Calendar.getInstance();
cal.setTime(date);
cal.add(Calendar.YEAR, -duration.getYears());
cal.add(Calendar.MONTH, -duration.getMonths());
cal.add(Calendar.DAY_OF_YEAR, -duration.getDays());
cal.add(Calendar.HOUR_OF_DAY, -duration.getHours());
cal.add(Calendar.MINUTE, -duration.getMinutes());
cal.add(Calendar.SECOND, -duration.getSeconds());
cal.add(Calendar.MILLISECOND, -duration.getMillis());
return cal.getTime();
}
// ...
Another requirement is the first argument of the static method must define the type the method is attached to once being activated. The other arguments are the normal arguments the method will take as parameters.
Because of the parameter and static method convention, category method definitions may be a bit less intuitive than
normal method definitions. As an alternative Groovy comes with a @Category
annotation that transforms annotated classes
into category classes at compile-time.
class Distance {
def number
String toString() { "${number}m" }
}
@Category(Number)
class NumberCategory {
Distance getMeters() {
new Distance(number: this)
}
}
use (NumberCategory) {
assert 42.meters.toString() == '42m'
}
Applying the @Category
annotation has the advantage of being able to use instance methods without the target type as a
first parameter. The target type class is given as an argument to the annotation instead.
There is a distinct section on @Category in the compile-time metaprogramming section.
|
Metaclasses
As explained earlier, Metaclasses play a central role in method resolution.
For every method invocation from groovy code, Groovy will find the MetaClass
for the given object
and delegate the method resolution to the metaclass via
MetaClass#invokeMethod
which should not be confused with
GroovyObject#invokeMethod
which happens to be a method that the metaclass may eventually call.
The default metaclass MetaClassImpl
By default, objects get an instance of MetaClassImpl
that implements the default method lookup.
This method lookup includes looking up of the method in the object class ("regular" method) but also if no
method is found this way it will resort to calling methodMissing
and ultimately
GroovyObject#invokeMethod
class Foo {}
def f = new Foo()
assert f.metaClass =~ /MetaClassImpl/
Custom metaclasses
You can change the metaclass of any object or class and replace with a custom implementation of the MetaClass
interface. Usually you will want to subclass one of the existing metaclasses MetaClassImpl
, DelegatingMetaClass
, ExpandoMetaClass
, ProxyMetaClass
, etc. otherwise you will need to implement the complete method lookup logic. Before using a new metaclass instance you should call groovy.lang.MetaClass#initialize() otherwise the metaclass may or may not behave as expected.
If you only need to decorate an existing metaclass the DelegatingMetaClass
simplifies that use case. The old metaclass implementation is still accessible via super
making easy to apply pretransformations to the inputs, routing to other methods and postprocess the outputs.
class Foo { def bar() { "bar" } }
class MyFooMetaClass extends DelegatingMetaClass {
MyFooMetaClass(MetaClass metaClass) { super(metaClass) }
MyFooMetaClass(Class theClass) { super(theClass) }
Object invokeMethod(Object object, String methodName, Object[] args) {
def result = super.invokeMethod(object,methodName.toLowerCase(), args)
result.toUpperCase();
}
}
def mc = new MyFooMetaClass(Foo.metaClass)
mc.initialize()
Foo.metaClass = mc
def f = new Foo()
assert f.BAR() == "BAR" // the new metaclass routes .BAR() to .bar() and uppercases the result
It is possible to change the metaclass at startup time by giving the metaclass a specially crafted (magic) class name and package name. In order to change the metaclass for java.lang.Integer
it’s enough to put a class groovy.runtime.metaclass.java.lang.IntegerMetaClass
in the classpath. This is useful, for example, when working with frameworks if you want to do metaclass changes before your code is executed by the framework. The general form of the magic package is groovy.runtime.metaclass.[package].[class]MetaClass
. In the example below the [package]
is java.lang
and the [class]
is Integer
:
// file: IntegerMetaClass.groovy
package groovy.runtime.metaclass.java.lang;
class IntegerMetaClass extends DelegatingMetaClass {
IntegerMetaClass(MetaClass metaClass) { super(metaClass) }
IntegerMetaClass(Class theClass) { super(theClass) }
Object invokeMethod(Object object, String name, Object[] args) {
if (name =~ /isBiggerThan/) {
def other = name.split(/isBiggerThan/)[1].toInteger()
object > other
} else {
return super.invokeMethod(object,name, args);
}
}
}
By compiling the above file with groovyc IntegerMetaClass.groovy
a ./groovy/runtime/metaclass/java/lang/IntegerMetaClass.class
will be generated. The example below will use this new metaclass:
// File testInteger.groovy
def i = 10
assert i.isBiggerThan5()
assert !i.isBiggerThan15()
println i.isBiggerThan5()
By running that file with groovy -cp . testInteger.groovy
the IntegerMetaClass
will be in the classpath and therefore it will become the metaclass for java.lang.Integer
intercepting the method calls to isBiggerThan*()
methods.
Per instance metaclass
You can change the metaclass of individual objects separately, so it’s possible to have multiple object of the same class with different metaclasses.
class Foo { def bar() { "bar" }}
class FooMetaClass extends DelegatingMetaClass {
FooMetaClass(MetaClass metaClass) { super(metaClass) }
Object invokeMethod(Object object, String name, Object[] args) {
super.invokeMethod(object,name,args).toUpperCase()
}
}
def f1 = new Foo()
def f2 = new Foo()
f2.metaClass = new FooMetaClass(f2.metaClass)
assert f1.bar() == "bar"
assert f2.bar() == "BAR"
assert f1.metaClass =~ /MetaClassImpl/
assert f2.metaClass =~ /FooMetaClass/
assert f1.class.toString() == "class Foo"
assert f2.class.toString() == "class Foo"
ExpandoMetaClass
Groovy comes with a special MetaClass
the so-called ExpandoMetaClass
. It is special in that it allows for dynamically
adding or changing methods, constructors, properties and even static methods by using a neat closure syntax.
Applying those modifications can be especially useful in mocking or stubbing scenarios as shown in the Testing Guide.
Every java.lang.Class
is supplied by Groovy with a special metaClass
property that will give you a reference to an
ExpandoMetaClass
instance. This instance can then be used to add methods or change the behaviour of already existing
ones.
By default ExpandoMetaClass doesn’t do inheritance. To enable this you must call ExpandoMetaClass#enableGlobally()
before your app starts such as in the main method or servlet bootstrap.
|
The following sections go into detail on how ExpandoMetaClass
can be used in various scenarios.
Once the ExpandoMetaClass
is accessed by calling the metaClass
property, methods can added by using either the left shift
<<
or the =
operator.
Note that the left shift operator is used to append a new method. If a public method with the same name and
parameter types is declared by the class or interface, including those inherited from superclasses and superinterfaces
but excluding those added to the metaClass at runtime, an exception will be thrown. If you want to replace a
method declared by the class or interface you can use the = operator.
|
The operators are applied on a non-existent property of metaClass
passing an instance of a Closure
code block.
class Book {
String title
}
Book.metaClass.titleInUpperCase << {-> title.toUpperCase() }
def b = new Book(title:"The Stand")
assert "THE STAND" == b.titleInUpperCase()
The example above shows how a new method can be added to a class by accessing the metaClass
property and using the <<
or
=
operator to assign a Closure
code block. The Closure
parameters are interpreted as method parameters. Parameterless methods
can be added by using the {→ …}
syntax.
ExpandoMetaClass
supports two mechanisms for adding or overriding properties.
Firstly, it has support for declaring a mutable property by simply assigning a value to a property of metaClass
:
class Book {
String title
}
Book.metaClass.author = "Stephen King"
def b = new Book()
assert "Stephen King" == b.author
Another way is to add getter and/or setter methods by using the standard mechanisms for adding instance methods.
class Book {
String title
}
Book.metaClass.getAuthor << {-> "Stephen King" }
def b = new Book()
assert "Stephen King" == b.author
In the source code example above the property is dictated by the closure and is a read-only property. It is feasible to add an equivalent setter method but then the property value needs to be stored for later usage. This could be done as shown in the following example.
class Book {
String title
}
def properties = Collections.synchronizedMap([:])
Book.metaClass.setAuthor = { String value ->
properties[System.identityHashCode(delegate) + "author"] = value
}
Book.metaClass.getAuthor = {->
properties[System.identityHashCode(delegate) + "author"]
}
This is not the only technique however. For example in a servlet container one way might be to store the values in the currently executing request as request attributes (as is done in some cases in Grails).
Constructors can be added by using a special constructor
property. Either the <<
or =
operator can be used
to assign a Closure
code block. The Closure
arguments will become the constructor arguments when the code is
executed at runtime.
class Book {
String title
}
Book.metaClass.constructor << { String title -> new Book(title:title) }
def book = new Book('Groovy in Action - 2nd Edition')
assert book.title == 'Groovy in Action - 2nd Edition'
Be careful when adding constructors however, as it is very easy to get into stack overflow troubles. |
Static methods can be added using the same technique as instance methods with the addition of the static
qualifier
before the method name.
class Book {
String title
}
Book.metaClass.static.create << { String title -> new Book(title:title) }
def b = Book.create("The Stand")
With ExpandoMetaClass
it is possible to use Groovy’s method pointer syntax to borrow methods from other classes.
class Person {
String name
}
class MortgageLender {
def borrowMoney() {
"buy house"
}
}
def lender = new MortgageLender()
Person.metaClass.buyHouse = lender.&borrowMoney
def p = new Person()
assert "buy house" == p.buyHouse()
Since Groovy allows you to use Strings as property names this in turns allows you to dynamically create method and property names at runtime. To create a method with a dynamic name simply use the language feature of reference property names as strings.
class Person {
String name = "Fred"
}
def methodName = "Bob"
Person.metaClass."changeNameTo${methodName}" = {-> delegate.name = "Bob" }
def p = new Person()
assert "Fred" == p.name
p.changeNameToBob()
assert "Bob" == p.name
The same concept can be applied to static methods and properties.
One application of dynamic method names can be found in the Grails web application framework. The concept of "dynamic codecs" is implemented by using dynamic method names.
HTMLCodec
Classclass HTMLCodec {
static encode = { theTarget ->
HtmlUtils.htmlEscape(theTarget.toString())
}
static decode = { theTarget ->
HtmlUtils.htmlUnescape(theTarget.toString())
}
}
The example above shows a codec implementation. Grails comes with various codec implementations each defined in a single class.
At runtime there will be multiple codec classes in the application classpath. At application startup the framework adds
a encodeXXX
and a decodeXXX
method to certain meta-classes where XXX
is the first part of the codec class name (e.g.
encodeHTML
). This mechanism is in the following shown in some Groovy pseudo-code:
def codecs = classes.findAll { it.name.endsWith('Codec') }
codecs.each { codec ->
Object.metaClass."encodeAs${codec.name-'Codec'}" = { codec.newInstance().encode(delegate) }
Object.metaClass."decodeFrom${codec.name-'Codec'}" = { codec.newInstance().decode(delegate) }
}
def html = '<html><body>hello</body></html>'
assert '<html><body>hello</body></html>' == html.encodeAsHTML()
At runtime it is often useful to know what other methods or properties exist at the time the method is executed. ExpandoMetaClass
provides the following methods as of this writing:
-
getMetaMethod
-
hasMetaMethod
-
getMetaProperty
-
hasMetaProperty
Why can’t you just use reflection? Well because Groovy is different, it has the methods that are "real" methods and methods that are available only at runtime. These are sometimes (but not always) represented as MetaMethods. The MetaMethods tell you what methods are available at runtime, thus your code can adapt.
This is of particular use when overriding invokeMethod
, getProperty
and/or setProperty
.
Another feature of ExpandoMetaClass
is that it allows to override the methods invokeMethod
, getProperty
and
setProperty
, all of them can be found in the groovy.lang.GroovyObject
class.
The following example shows how to override invokeMethod
:
class Stuff {
def invokeMe() { "foo" }
}
Stuff.metaClass.invokeMethod = { String name, args ->
def metaMethod = Stuff.metaClass.getMetaMethod(name, args)
def result
if(metaMethod) result = metaMethod.invoke(delegate,args)
else {
result = "bar"
}
result
}
def stf = new Stuff()
assert "foo" == stf.invokeMe()
assert "bar" == stf.doStuff()
The first step in the Closure
code is to lookup the MetaMethod
for the given name and arguments. If the method
can be found everything is fine and it is delegated to. If not, a dummy value is returned.
A MetaMethod is a method that is known to exist on the MetaClass whether added at runtime or at compile-time.
|
The same logic can be used to override setProperty
or getProperty
.
class Person {
String name = "Fred"
}
Person.metaClass.getProperty = { String name ->
def metaProperty = Person.metaClass.getMetaProperty(name)
def result
if(metaProperty) result = metaProperty.getProperty(delegate)
else {
result = "Flintstone"
}
result
}
def p = new Person()
assert "Fred" == p.name
assert "Flintstone" == p.other
The important thing to note here is that instead of a MetaMethod
a MetaProperty
instance is looked up. If that exists
the getProperty
method of the MetaProperty
is called, passing the delegate.
ExpandoMetaClass
even allows for overriding static method with a special invokeMethod
syntax.
class Stuff {
static invokeMe() { "foo" }
}
Stuff.metaClass.'static'.invokeMethod = { String name, args ->
def metaMethod = Stuff.metaClass.getStaticMetaMethod(name, args)
def result
if(metaMethod) result = metaMethod.invoke(delegate,args)
else {
result = "bar"
}
result
}
assert "foo" == Stuff.invokeMe()
assert "bar" == Stuff.doStuff()
The logic that is used for overriding the static method is the same as we’ve seen before for overriding instance methods. The
only difference is the access to the metaClass.static
property and the call to getStaticMethodName
for retrieving
the static MetaMethod
instance.
It is possible to add methods onto interfaces with ExpandoMetaClass
. To do this however, it must be enabled
globally using the ExpandoMetaClass.enableGlobally()
method before application start-up.
List.metaClass.sizeDoubled = {-> delegate.size() * 2 }
def list = []
list << 1
list << 2
assert 4 == list.sizeDoubled()
Extension modules
Extending existing classes
An extension module allows you to add new methods to existing classes, including classes which are precompiled, like classes from the JDK. Those new methods, unlike those defined through a metaclass or using a category, are available globally. For example, when you write:
def file = new File(...)
def contents = file.getText('utf-8')
The getText
method doesn’t exist on the File
class. However, Groovy knows it because it is defined in a special
class, ResourceGroovyMethods
:
public static String getText(File file, String charset) throws IOException {
return IOGroovyMethods.getText(newReader(file, charset));
}
You may notice that the extension method is defined using a static method in a helper class (where various extension
methods are defined). The first argument of the getText
method corresponds to the receiver, while additional parameters
correspond to the arguments of the extension method. So here, we are defining a method called getText on
the File
class (because the first argument is of type File
), which takes a single argument as a parameter (the encoding String
).
The process of creating an extension module is simple:
-
write an extension class like above
-
write a module descriptor file
Then you have to make the extension module visible to Groovy, which is as simple as having the extension module classes and descriptor available on classpath. This means that you have the choice:
-
either provide the classes and module descriptor directly on classpath
-
or bundle your extension module into a jar for reusability
An extension module may add two kind of methods to a class:
-
instance methods (to be called on an instance of a class)
-
static methods (to be called on the class itself)
Instance methods
To add an instance method to an existing class, you need to create an extension class. For example, let’s say you
want to add a maxRetries
method on Integer
which accepts a closure and executes it at most n times until no
exception is thrown. To do that, you only need to write the following:
class MaxRetriesExtension { (1)
static void maxRetries(Integer self, Closure code) { (2)
assert self >= 0
int retries = self
Throwable e = null
while (retries > 0) {
try {
code.call()
break
} catch (Throwable err) {
e = err
retries--
}
}
if (retries == 0 && e) {
throw e
}
}
}
1 | The extension class |
2 | First argument of the static method corresponds to the receiver of the message, that is to say the extended instance |
Then, after having declared your extension class, you can call it this way:
int i=0
5.maxRetries {
i++
}
assert i == 1
i=0
try {
5.maxRetries {
i++
throw new RuntimeException("oops")
}
} catch (RuntimeException e) {
assert i == 5
}
Static methods
It is also possible to add static methods to a class. In that case, the static method needs to be defined in its own file. Static and instance extension methods cannot be present in the same class.
class StaticStringExtension { (1)
static String greeting(String self) { (2)
'Hello, world!'
}
}
1 | The static extension class |
2 | First argument of the static method corresponds to the class being extended and is unused |
In which case you can call it directly on the String
class:
assert String.greeting() == 'Hello, world!'
Module descriptor
For Groovy to be able to load your extension methods, you must declare
your extension helper classes. You must create a file named
org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.ExtensionModule
into the
META-INF/groovy
directory:
moduleName=Test module for specifications moduleVersion=1.0-test extensionClasses=support.MaxRetriesExtension staticExtensionClasses=support.StaticStringExtension
The module descriptor requires 4 keys:
-
moduleName : the name of your module
-
moduleVersion: the version of your module. Note that version number is only used to check that you don’t load the same module in two different versions.
-
extensionClasses: the list of extension helper classes for instance methods. You can provide several classes, given that they are comma separated.
-
staticExtensionClasses: the list of extension helper classes for static methods. You can provide several classes, given that they are comma separated.
Note that it is not required for a module to define both static helpers and instance helpers, and that you may add several classes to a single module. You can also extend different classes in a single module without problem. It is even possible to use different classes in a single extension class, but it is recommended to group extension methods into classes by feature set.
Extension modules and classpath
It’s worth noting that you can’t use an extension which is compiled at the same time as code using it. That means that to use an extension, it has to be available on classpath, as compiled classes, before the code using it gets compiled. Usually, this means that you can’t have the test classes in the same source unit as the extension class itself. Since in general, test sources are separated from normal sources and executed in another step of the build, this is not an issue.
3.4.2. Compile-time metaprogramming
Compile-time metaprogramming in Groovy allows code generation at compile-time. Those transformations are altering the Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) of a program, which is why in Groovy we call it AST transformations. AST transformations allow you to hook into the compilation process, modify the AST and continue the compilation process to generate regular bytecode. Compared to runtime metaprogramming, this has the advantage of making the changes visible in the class file itself (that is to say, in the bytecode). Making it visible in the bytecode is important for example if you want the transformations to be part of the class contract (implementing interfaces, extending abstract classes, …) or even if you need your class to be callable from Java (or other JVM languages). For example, an AST transformation can add methods to a class. If you do it with runtime metaprogramming, the new method would only be visible from Groovy. If you do the same using compile-time metaprogramming, the method would be visible from Java too. Last but not least, performance would likely be better with compile-time metaprogramming (because no initialization phase is required).
In this section, we will start with explaining the various compile-time transformations that are bundled with the Groovy distribution. In a subsequent section, we will describe how you can implement your own AST transformations and what are the disadvantages of this technique.
Available AST transformations
Groovy comes with various AST transformations covering different needs: reducing boilerplate (code generation), implementing design patterns (delegation, …), logging, declarative concurrency, cloning, safer scripting, tweaking the compilation, implementing Swing patterns, testing and eventually managing dependencies. If none of those AST transformations cover your needs, you can still implement your own, as show in section Developing your own AST transformations.
AST transformations can be separated into two categories:
-
global AST transformations are applied transparently, globally, as soon as they are found on compile classpath
-
local AST transformations are applied by annotating the source code with markers. Unlike global AST transformations, local AST transformations may support parameters.
Groovy doesn’t ship with any global AST transformation, but you can find a list of local AST transformations available for you to use in your code here:
Code generation transformations
This category of transformation includes AST transformations which help removing boilerplate code. This is typically code that you have to write but that does not carry any useful information. By autogenerating this boilerplate code, the code you have to write is left clean and concise and the chance of introducing an error by getting such boilerplate code incorrect is reduced.
@groovy.transform.ToString
The @ToString
AST transformation generates a human readable toString
representation of the class. For example,
annotating the Person
class like below will automatically generate the toString
method for you:
import groovy.transform.ToString
@ToString
class Person {
String firstName
String lastName
}
With this definition, then the following assertion passes, meaning that a toString
method taking the field values from
the class and printing them out has been generated:
def p = new Person(firstName: 'Jack', lastName: 'Nicholson')
assert p.toString() == 'Person(Jack, Nicholson)'
The @ToString
annotation accepts several parameters which are summarized in the following table:
Attribute | Default value | Description | Example |
---|---|---|---|
excludes |
Empty list |
List of properties to exclude from toString |
|
includes |
Undefined marker list (indicates all fields) |
List of fields to include in toString |
|
includeSuper |
False |
Should superclass be included in toString |
|
includeNames |
false |
Whether to include names of properties in generated toString. |
|
includeFields |
False |
Should fields be included in toString, in addition to properties |
|
includeSuperProperties |
False |
Should super properties be included in toString |
|
includeSuperFields |
False |
Should visible super fields be included in toString |
|
ignoreNulls |
False |
Should properties/fields with null value be displayed |
|
includePackage |
True |
Use fully qualified class name instead of simple name in toString |
|
allProperties |
True |
Include all JavaBean properties in toString |
|
cache |
False |
Cache the toString string. Should only be set to true if the class is immutable. |
|
allNames |
False |
Should fields and/or properties with internal names be included in the generated toString |
|
@groovy.transform.EqualsAndHashCode
The @EqualsAndHashCode
AST transformation aims at generating equals
and hashCode
methods for you. The generated
hashcode follows the best practices as described in Effective Java by Josh Bloch:
import groovy.transform.EqualsAndHashCode
@EqualsAndHashCode
class Person {
String firstName
String lastName
}
def p1 = new Person(firstName: 'Jack', lastName: 'Nicholson')
def p2 = new Person(firstName: 'Jack', lastName: 'Nicholson')
assert p1==p2
assert p1.hashCode() == p2.hashCode()
There are several options available to tweak the behavior of @EqualsAndHashCode
:
Attribute | Default value | Description | Example |
---|---|---|---|
excludes |
Empty list |
List of properties to exclude from equals/hashCode |
|
includes |
Undefined marker list (indicating all fields) |
List of fields to include in equals/hashCode |
|
cache |
False |
Cache the hashCode computation. Should only be set to true if the class is immutable. |
|
callSuper |
False |
Whether to include super in equals and hashCode calculations |
|
includeFields |
False |
Should fields be included in equals/hashCode, in addition to properties |
|
useCanEqual |
True |
Should equals call canEqual helper method. |
|
allProperties |
False |
Should JavaBean properties be included in equals and hashCode calculations |
|
allNames |
False |
Should fields and/or properties with internal names be included in equals and hashCode calculations |
|
@groovy.transform.TupleConstructor
The @TupleConstructor
annotation aims at eliminating boilerplate code by generating constructors for you. A tuple
constructor is created having a parameter for each property (and possibly each field). Each parameter has a default value
(using the initial value of the property if present or otherwise Java’s default value according to the properties type).
Normally you don’t need to understand the imp[ementation details of the generated constructor(s); you just use them in the normal way. However, if you want to add multiple constructors, understand Java integration options or meet requirements of some dependency injection frameworks, then some details are useful.
As previously mentioned, the generated constructor has default values applied. In later compilation phases, the Groovy compiler’s standard default value processing behavior is then applied. The end result is that multiple constructors are placed within the bytecode of your class. This provides a well understood semantics and is also useful for Java integration purposes. As an example, the following code will generate 3 constructors:
import groovy.transform.TupleConstructor
@TupleConstructor
class Person {
String firstName
String lastName
}
// traditional map-style constructor
def p1 = new Person(firstName: 'Jack', lastName: 'Nicholson')
// generated tuple constructor
def p2 = new Person('Jack', 'Nicholson')
// generated tuple constructor with default value for second property
def p3 = new Person('Jack')
The first constructor is a no-arg constructor which allows the traditional map-style construction so long as you don’t have final properties. Groovy calls the no-arg constructor and then the relevant setters under the covers. It is worth noting that if the first property (or field) has type LinkedHashMap or if there is a single Map, AbstractMap or HashMap property (or field), then the map-style named arguments won’t be available.
The other constructors are generated by taking the properties in the order they are defined. Groovy will generate as many constructors as there are properties (or fields, depending on the options).
Setting the defaults
attribute (see the available configuration options table) to false
, disables the normal default values behavior which means:
-
Exactly one constructor will be produced
-
Attempting to use an initial value will produce an error
-
Map-style named arguments won’t be available
This attribute is normally only used in situations where another Java framework is expecting exactly one constructor, e.g. injection frameworks or JUnit parameterized runners.
If the @PropertyOptions
annotation is also found on the class with the @TupleConstructor
annotation,
then the generated constructor may contain custom property handling logic.
The propertyHandler
attribute on the @PropertyOptions
annotation could for instance be set to
ImmutablePropertyHandler
which will result in the addition of the necessary logic for immutable classes
(defensive copy in, cloning, etc.). This normally would happen automatically behind the scenes when you use
the @Immutable
meta-annotation.
Some of the annotation attributes might not be supported by all property handlers.
The @TupleConstructor
AST transformation accepts several annotation attributes:
Attribute | Default value | Description | Example |
---|---|---|---|
excludes |
Empty list |
List of properties to exclude from tuple constructor generation |
|
includes |
Undefined list (indicates all fields) |
List of fields to include in tuple constructor generation |
|
includeProperties |
True |
Should properties be included in tuple constructor generation |
|
includeFields |
False |
Should fields be included in tuple constructor generation, in addition to properties |
|
includeSuperProperties |
True |
Should properties from super classes be included in tuple constructor generation |
|
includeSuperFields |
False |
Should fields from super classes be included in tuple constructor generation |
|
callSuper |
False |
Should super properties be called within a call to the parent constructor rather than set as properties |
|
force |
False |
By default, the transformation will do nothing if a constructor is already defined. Setting this attribute to true, the constructor will be generated and it’s your responsibility to ensure that no duplicate constructor is defined. |
|
defaults |
True |
Indicates that default value processing is enabled for constructor parameters. Set to false to obtain exactly one constructor but with initial value support and named-arguments disabled. |
|
useSetters |
False |
By default, the transformation will directly set the backing field of each property from its corresponding constructor parameter. Setting this attribute to true, the constructor will instead call setters if they exist. It’s usually deemed bad style from within a constructor to call setters that can be overridden. It’s your responsibility to avoid such bad style. |
|
allNames |
False |
Should fields and/or properties with internal names be included within the constructor |
|
allProperties |
False |
Should JavaBean properties be included within the constructor |
|
pre |
empty |
A closure containing statements to be inserted at the start of the generated constructor(s) |
|
post |
empty |
A closure containing statements to be inserted at the end of the generated constructor(s) |
|
Setting the defaults
annotation attribute to false
and the force
annotation attribute to true
allows
multiple tuple constructors to be created by using different customization options for the different cases
(provided each case has a different type signature) as shown in the following example:
class Named {
String name
}
@ToString(includeSuperProperties=true, ignoreNulls=true, includeNames=true, includeFields=true)
@TupleConstructor(force=true, defaults=false)
@TupleConstructor(force=true, defaults=false, includeFields=true)
@TupleConstructor(force=true, defaults=false, includeSuperProperties=true)
class Book extends Named {
Integer published
private Boolean fiction
Book() {}
}
assert new Book("Regina", 2015).toString() == 'Book(published:2015, name:Regina)'
assert new Book(2015, false).toString() == 'Book(published:2015, fiction:false)'
assert new Book(2015).toString() == 'Book(published:2015)'
assert new Book().toString() == 'Book()'
assert Book.constructors.size() == 4
Similarly, here is another example using different options for includes
:
@ToString(includeSuperProperties=true, ignoreNulls=true, includeNames=true, includeFields=true)
@TupleConstructor(force=true, defaults=false, includes='name,year')
@TupleConstructor(force=true, defaults=false, includes='year,fiction')
@TupleConstructor(force=true, defaults=false, includes='name,fiction')
class Book {
String name
Integer year
Boolean fiction
}
assert new Book("Regina", 2015).toString() == 'Book(name:Regina, year:2015)'
assert new Book(2015, false).toString() == 'Book(year:2015, fiction:false)'
assert new Book("Regina", false).toString() == 'Book(name:Regina, fiction:false)'
assert Book.constructors.size() == 3
@groovy.transform.MapConstructor
The @MapConstructor
annotation aims at eliminating boilerplate code by generating a map constructor for you. A map
constructor is created such that each property in the class is set based on the value in the supplied map
having the key with the name of the property. Usage is as shown in this example:
import groovy.transform.*
@ToString
@MapConstructor
class Person {
String firstName
String lastName
}
def p1 = new Person(firstName: 'Jack', lastName: 'Nicholson')
assert p1.toString() == 'Person(Jack, Nicholson)'
The generated constructor will be roughly like this:
public Person(Map args) {
if (args.containsKey('firstName')) {
this.firstName = args.get('firstName')
}
if (args.containsKey('lastName')) {
this.lastName = args.get('lastName')
}
}
@groovy.transform.Canonical
The @Canonical
meta-annotation combines the @ToString,
@EqualsAndHashCode and @TupleConstructor
annotations:
import groovy.transform.Canonical
@Canonical
class Person {
String firstName
String lastName
}
def p1 = new Person(firstName: 'Jack', lastName: 'Nicholson')
assert p1.toString() == 'Person(Jack, Nicholson)' // Effect of @ToString
def p2 = new Person('Jack','Nicholson') // Effect of @TupleConstructor
assert p2.toString() == 'Person(Jack, Nicholson)'
assert p1==p2 // Effect of @EqualsAndHashCode
assert p1.hashCode()==p2.hashCode() // Effect of @EqualsAndHashCode
A similar immutable class can be generated using the @Immutable meta-annotation instead.
The @Canonical
meta-annotation supports the configuration options found in the annotations
it aggregates. See those annotations for more details.
import groovy.transform.Canonical
@Canonical(excludes=['lastName'])
class Person {
String firstName
String lastName
}
def p1 = new Person(firstName: 'Jack', lastName: 'Nicholson')
assert p1.toString() == 'Person(Jack)' // Effect of @ToString(excludes=['lastName'])
def p2 = new Person('Jack') // Effect of @TupleConstructor(excludes=['lastName'])
assert p2.toString() == 'Person(Jack)'
assert p1==p2 // Effect of @EqualsAndHashCode(excludes=['lastName'])
assert p1.hashCode()==p2.hashCode() // Effect of @EqualsAndHashCode(excludes=['lastName'])
The @Canonical
meta-annotation can be used in conjunction with an explicit use one or more of its
component annotations, like this:
import groovy.transform.Canonical
@Canonical(excludes=['lastName'])
class Person {
String firstName
String lastName
}
def p1 = new Person(firstName: 'Jack', lastName: 'Nicholson')
assert p1.toString() == 'Person(Jack)' // Effect of @ToString(excludes=['lastName'])
def p2 = new Person('Jack') // Effect of @TupleConstructor(excludes=['lastName'])
assert p2.toString() == 'Person(Jack)'
assert p1==p2 // Effect of @EqualsAndHashCode(excludes=['lastName'])
assert p1.hashCode()==p2.hashCode() // Effect of @EqualsAndHashCode(excludes=['lastName'])
Any applicable annotation attributes from @Canonical
are passed along to the explicit annotation but
attributes already existing in the explicit annotation take precedence.
@groovy.transform.InheritConstructors
The @InheritConstructor
AST transformation aims at generating constructors matching super constructors for you. This
is in particular useful when overriding exception classes:
import groovy.transform.InheritConstructors
@InheritConstructors
class CustomException extends Exception {}
// all those are generated constructors
new CustomException()
new CustomException("A custom message")
new CustomException("A custom message", new RuntimeException())
new CustomException(new RuntimeException())
// Java 7 only
// new CustomException("A custom message", new RuntimeException(), false, true)
The @InheritConstructor
AST transformation supports the following configuration options:
Attribute | Default value | Description | Example |
---|---|---|---|
constructorAnnotations |
False |
Whether to carry over annotations from the constructor during copying |
|
parameterAnnotations |
False |
Whether to carry over annotations from the constructor parameters when copying the constructor |
|
@groovy.lang.Category
The @Category
AST transformation simplifies the creation of Groovy categories. Historically, a Groovy category was
written like this:
class TripleCategory {
public static Integer triple(Integer self) {
3*self
}
}
use (TripleCategory) {
assert 9 == 3.triple()
}
The @Category
transformation lets you write the same using an instance-style class, rather than a static class style.
This removes the need for having the first argument of each method being the receiver. The category can be written like
this:
@Category(Integer)
class TripleCategory {
public Integer triple() { 3*this }
}
use (TripleCategory) {
assert 9 == 3.triple()
}
Note that the mixed in class can be referenced using this
instead. It’s also worth noting that using instance fields
in a category class is inherently unsafe: categories are not stateful (like traits).
@groovy.transform.IndexedProperty
The @IndexedProperty
annotation aims at generating indexed getters/setters for properties of list/array types.
This is in particular useful if you want to use a Groovy class from Java. While Groovy supports GPath to access properties,
this is not available from Java. The @IndexedProperty
annotation will generate indexed properties of the following
form:
class SomeBean {
@IndexedProperty String[] someArray = new String[2]
@IndexedProperty List someList = []
}
def bean = new SomeBean()
bean.setSomeArray(0, 'value')
bean.setSomeList(0, 123)
assert bean.someArray[0] == 'value'
assert bean.someList == [123]
@groovy.lang.Lazy
The @Lazy
AST transformation implements lazy initialization of fields. For example, the following code:
class SomeBean {
@Lazy LinkedList myField
}
will produce the following code:
List $myField
List getMyField() {
if ($myField!=null) { return $myField }
else {
$myField = new LinkedList()
return $myField
}
}
The default value which is used to initialize the field is the default constructor of the declaration type. It is possible to define a default value by using a closure on the right hand side of the property assignment, as in the following example:
class SomeBean { @Lazy LinkedList myField = { ['a','b','c']}() }
In that case, the generated code looks like the following:
List $myField List getMyField() { if ($myField!=null) { return $myField } else { $myField = { ['a','b','c']}() return $myField } }
If the field is declared volatile then initialization will be synchronized using the double-checked locking pattern.
Using the soft=true
parameter, the helper field will use a SoftReference
instead, providing a simple way to
implement caching. In that case, if the garbage collector decides to collect the reference, initialization will occur
the next time the field is accessed.
@groovy.lang.Newify
The @Newify
AST transformation is used to bring alternative syntaxes to construct objects:
-
Using the
Python
style:
@Newify([Tree,Leaf]) class TreeBuilder { Tree tree = Tree(Leaf('A'),Leaf('B'),Tree(Leaf('C'))) }
-
or using the
Ruby
style:
@Newify([Tree,Leaf]) class TreeBuilder { Tree tree = Tree.new(Leaf.new('A'),Leaf.new('B'),Tree.new(Leaf.new('C'))) }
The Ruby
version can be disabled by setting the auto
flag to false
.
@groovy.transform.Sortable
The @Sortable
AST transformation is used to help write classes that are Comparable
and easily sorted
typically by numerous properties. It is easy to use as shown in the following example where we annotate
the Person
class:
import groovy.transform.Sortable
@Sortable class Person {
String first
String last
Integer born
}
The generated class has the following properties:
-
it implements the
Comparable
interface -
it contains a
compareTo
method with an implementation based on the natural ordering of thefirst
,last
andborn
properties -
it has three methods returning comparators:
comparatorByFirst
,comparatorByLast
andcomparatorByBorn
.
The generated compareTo
method will look like this:
public int compareTo(java.lang.Object obj) {
if (this.is(obj)) {
return 0
}
if (!(obj instanceof Person)) {
return -1
}
java.lang.Integer value = this.first <=> obj.first
if (value != 0) {
return value
}
value = this.last <=> obj.last
if (value != 0) {
return value
}
value = this.born <=> obj.born
if (value != 0) {
return value
}
return 0
}
As an example of the generated comparators, the comparatorByFirst
comparator will have a compare
method that looks like this:
public int compare(java.lang.Object arg0, java.lang.Object arg1) {
if (arg0 == arg1) {
return 0
}
if (arg0 != null && arg1 == null) {
return -1
}
if (arg0 == null && arg1 != null) {
return 1
}
return arg0.first <=> arg1.first
}
The Person
class can be used wherever a Comparable
is expected and the generated comparators
wherever a Comparator
is expected as shown by these examples:
def people = [
new Person(first: 'Johnny', last: 'Depp', born: 1963),
new Person(first: 'Keira', last: 'Knightley', born: 1985),
new Person(first: 'Geoffrey', last: 'Rush', born: 1951),
new Person(first: 'Orlando', last: 'Bloom', born: 1977)
]
assert people[0] > people[2]
assert people.sort()*.last == ['Rush', 'Depp', 'Knightley', 'Bloom']
assert people.sort(false, Person.comparatorByFirst())*.first == ['Geoffrey', 'Johnny', 'Keira', 'Orlando']
assert people.sort(false, Person.comparatorByLast())*.last == ['Bloom', 'Depp', 'Knightley', 'Rush']
assert people.sort(false, Person.comparatorByBorn())*.last == ['Rush', 'Depp', 'Bloom', 'Knightley']
Normally, all properties are used in the generated compareTo
method in the priority order in which they are defined.
You can include or exclude certain properties from the generated compareTo
method by giving a list of property names
in the includes
or excludes
annotation attributes. If using includes
, the order of the property names given will
determine the priority of properties when comparing. To illustrate, consider the following Person
class definition:
@Sortable(includes='first,born') class Person {
String last
int born
String first
}
It will have two comparator methods comparatorByFirst
and comparatorByBorn
and the generated compareTo
method will look like this:
public int compareTo(java.lang.Object obj) {
if (this.is(obj)) {
return 0
}
if (!(obj instanceof Person)) {
return -1
}
java.lang.Integer value = this.first <=> obj.first
if (value != 0) {
return value
}
value = this.born <=> obj.born
if (value != 0) {
return value
}
return 0
}
This Person
class can be used as follows:
def people = [
new Person(first: 'Ben', last: 'Affleck', born: 1972),
new Person(first: 'Ben', last: 'Stiller', born: 1965)
]
assert people.sort()*.last == ['Stiller', 'Affleck']
The behavior of the @Sortable
AST transformation can be further changed using the following additional parameters:
Attribute | Default value | Description | Example |
---|---|---|---|
allProperties |
True |
Should JavaBean properties (ordered after native properties) be used |
|
allNames |
False |
Should properties with "internal" names be used |
|
includeSuperProperties |
False |
Should super properties also be used (ordered first) |
|
@groovy.transform.builder.Builder
The @Builder
AST transformation is used to help write classes that can be created using fluent api calls.
The transform supports multiple building strategies to cover a range of cases and there are a number
of configuration options to customize the building process. If you’re an AST hacker, you can also define your own
strategy class. The following table lists the available strategies that are bundled with Groovy and the
configuration options each strategy supports.
Strategy |
Description |
builderClassName |
builderMethodName |
buildMethodName |
prefix |
includes/excludes |
includeSuperProperties |
allNames |
|
chained setters |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
yes, default "set" |
yes |
n/a |
yes, default |
|
explicit builder class, class being built untouched |
n/a |
n/a |
yes, default "build" |
yes, default "" |
yes |
yes, default |
yes, default |
|
creates a nested helper class |
yes, default <TypeName>Builder |
yes, default "builder" |
yes, default "build" |
yes, default "" |
yes |
yes, default |
yes, default |
|
creates a nested helper class providing type-safe fluent creation |
yes, default <TypeName>Initializer |
yes, default "createInitializer" |
yes, default "create" but usually only used internally |
yes, default "" |
yes |
yes, default |
yes, default |
To use the SimpleStrategy
, annotate your Groovy class using the @Builder
annotation, and specify the strategy as shown in this example:
import groovy.transform.builder.*
@Builder(builderStrategy=SimpleStrategy)
class Person {
String first
String last
Integer born
}
Then, just call the setters in a chained fashion as shown here:
def p1 = new Person().setFirst('Johnny').setLast('Depp').setBorn(1963)
assert "$p1.first $p1.last" == 'Johnny Depp'
For each property, a generated setter will be created which looks like this:
public Person setFirst(java.lang.String first) {
this.first = first
return this
}
You can specify a prefix as shown in this example:
import groovy.transform.builder.*
@Builder(builderStrategy=SimpleStrategy, prefix="")
class Person {
String first
String last
Integer born
}
And calling the chained setters would look like this:
def p = new Person().first('Johnny').last('Depp').born(1963)
assert "$p.first $p.last" == 'Johnny Depp'
You can use the SimpleStrategy
in conjunction with @TupleConstructor
. If your @Builder
annotation doesn’t have explicit includes
or excludes
annotation attributes but your @TupleConstructor
annotation does, the ones from @TupleConstructor
will be re-used for @Builder
. The same applies for any
annotation aliases which combine @TupleConstructor
such as @Canonical
.
The annotation attribute useSetters
can be used if you have a setter which you want called as part of the
construction process. See the JavaDoc for details.
The annotation attributes builderClassName
, buildMethodName
, builderMethodName
, forClass
and includeSuperProperties
are not supported for this strategy.
Groovy already has built-in building mechanisms. Don’t rush to using @Builder if the built-in mechanisms meet your needs. Some examples:
|
def p2 = new Person(first: 'Keira', last: 'Knightley', born: 1985)
def p3 = new Person().with {
first = 'Geoffrey'
last = 'Rush'
born = 1951
}
To use the ExternalStrategy
, create and annotate a Groovy builder class using the @Builder
annotation, specify the
class the builder is for using forClass
and indicate use of the ExternalStrategy
.
Suppose you have the following class you would like a builder for:
class Person {
String first
String last
int born
}
you explicitly create and use your builder class as follows:
import groovy.transform.builder.*
@Builder(builderStrategy=ExternalStrategy, forClass=Person)
class PersonBuilder { }
def p = new PersonBuilder().first('Johnny').last('Depp').born(1963).build()
assert "$p.first $p.last" == 'Johnny Depp'
Note that the (normally empty) builder class you provide will be filled in with appropriate setters and a build method. The generated build method will look something like:
public Person build() {
Person _thePerson = new Person()
_thePerson.first = first
_thePerson.last = last
_thePerson.born = born
return _thePerson
}
The class you are creating the builder for can be any Java or Groovy class following the normal JavaBean conventions, e.g. a no-arg constructor and setters for the properties. Here is an example using a Java class:
import groovy.transform.builder.*
@Builder(builderStrategy=ExternalStrategy, forClass=javax.swing.DefaultButtonModel)
class ButtonModelBuilder {}
def model = new ButtonModelBuilder().enabled(true).pressed(true).armed(true).rollover(true).selected(true).build()
assert model.isArmed()
assert model.isPressed()
assert model.isEnabled()
assert model.isSelected()
assert model.isRollover()
The generated builder can be customised using the prefix
, includes
, excludes
and buildMethodName
annotation attributes.
Here is an example illustrating various customisations:
import groovy.transform.builder.*
import groovy.transform.Canonical
@Canonical
class Person {
String first
String last
int born
}
@Builder(builderStrategy=ExternalStrategy, forClass=Person, includes=['first', 'last'], buildMethodName='create', prefix='with')
class PersonBuilder { }
def p = new PersonBuilder().withFirst('Johnny').withLast('Depp').create()
assert "$p.first $p.last" == 'Johnny Depp'
The builderMethodName
and builderClassName
annotation attributes for @Builder
aren’t applicable for this strategy.
You can use the ExternalStrategy
in conjunction with @TupleConstructor
. If your @Builder
annotation doesn’t have
explicit includes
or excludes
annotation attributes but the @TupleConstructor
annotation of the class you are creating
the builder for does, the ones from @TupleConstructor
will be re-used for @Builder
. The same applies for any
annotation aliases which combine @TupleConstructor
such as @Canonical
.
To use the DefaultStrategy
, annotate your Groovy class using the @Builder
annotation as shown in this example:
import groovy.transform.builder.Builder
@Builder
class Person {
String firstName
String lastName
int age
}
def person = Person.builder().firstName("Robert").lastName("Lewandowski").age(21).build()
assert person.firstName == "Robert"
assert person.lastName == "Lewandowski"
assert person.age == 21
If you want, you can customize various aspects of the building process
using the builderClassName
, buildMethodName
, builderMethodName
, prefix
, includes
and excludes
annotation attributes,
some of which are used in the example here:
import groovy.transform.builder.Builder
@Builder(buildMethodName='make', builderMethodName='maker', prefix='with', excludes='age')
class Person {
String firstName
String lastName
int age
}
def p = Person.maker().withFirstName("Robert").withLastName("Lewandowski").make()
assert "$p.firstName $p.lastName" == "Robert Lewandowski"
This strategy also supports annotating static methods and constructors. In this case, the static method or constructor
parameters become the properties to use for building purposes and in the case of static methods, the return type
of the method becomes the target class being built. If you have more than one @Builder
annotation used within
a class (at either the class, method or constructor positions) then it is up to you to ensure that the generated
helper classes and factory methods have unique names (i.e. no more than one can use the default name values).
Here is an example highlighting method and constructor usage (and also illustrating the renaming required for unique names).
import groovy.transform.builder.*
import groovy.transform.*
@ToString
@Builder
class Person {
String first, last
int born
Person(){}
@Builder(builderClassName='MovieBuilder', builderMethodName='byRoleBuilder')
Person(String roleName) {
if (roleName == 'Jack Sparrow') {
this.first = 'Johnny'; this.last = 'Depp'; this.born = 1963
}
}
@Builder(builderClassName='NameBuilder', builderMethodName='nameBuilder', prefix='having', buildMethodName='fullName')
static String join(String first, String last) {
first + ' ' + last
}
@Builder(builderClassName='SplitBuilder', builderMethodName='splitBuilder')
static Person split(String name, int year) {
def parts = name.split(' ')
new Person(first: parts[0], last: parts[1], born: year)
}
}
assert Person.splitBuilder().name("Johnny Depp").year(1963).build().toString() == 'Person(Johnny, Depp, 1963)'
assert Person.byRoleBuilder().roleName("Jack Sparrow").build().toString() == 'Person(Johnny, Depp, 1963)'
assert Person.nameBuilder().havingFirst('Johnny').havingLast('Depp').fullName() == 'Johnny Depp'
assert Person.builder().first("Johnny").last('Depp').born(1963).build().toString() == 'Person(Johnny, Depp, 1963)'
The forClass
annotation attribute is not supported for this strategy.
To use the InitializerStrategy
, annotate your Groovy class using the @Builder
annotation, and specify the strategy as shown in this example:
import groovy.transform.builder.*
import groovy.transform.*
@ToString
@Builder(builderStrategy=InitializerStrategy)
class Person {
String firstName
String lastName
int age
}
Your class will be locked down to have a single public constructor taking a "fully set" initializer. It will also have a factory method to create the initializer. These are used as follows:
@CompileStatic
def firstLastAge() {
assert new Person(Person.createInitializer().firstName("John").lastName("Smith").age(21)).toString() == 'Person(John, Smith, 21)'
}
firstLastAge()
Any attempt to use the initializer which doesn’t involve setting all the properties (though order is not important) will result in
a compilation error. If you don’t need this level of strictness, you don’t need to use @CompileStatic
.
You can use the InitializerStrategy
in conjunction with @Canonical
and @Immutable
. If your @Builder
annotation
doesn’t have explicit includes
or excludes
annotation attributes but your @Canonical
annotation does, the ones
from @Canonical
will be re-used for @Builder
. Here is an example using @Builder
with @Immutable
:
import groovy.transform.builder.*
import groovy.transform.*
import static groovy.transform.options.Visibility.PRIVATE
@Builder(builderStrategy=InitializerStrategy)
@Immutable
@VisibilityOptions(PRIVATE)
class Person {
String first
String last
int born
}
def publicCons = Person.constructors
assert publicCons.size() == 1
@CompileStatic
def createFirstLastBorn() {
def p = new Person(Person.createInitializer().first('Johnny').last('Depp').born(1963))
assert "$p.first $p.last $p.born" == 'Johnny Depp 1963'
}
createFirstLastBorn()
The annotation attribute useSetters
can be used if you have a setter which you want called as part of the
construction process. See the JavaDoc for details.
This strategy also supports annotating static methods and constructors. In this case, the static method or constructor
parameters become the properties to use for building purposes and in the case of static methods, the return type
of the method becomes the target class being built. If you have more than one @Builder
annotation used within
a class (at either the class, method or constructor positions) then it is up to you to ensure that the generated
helper classes and factory methods have unique names (i.e. no more than one can use the default name values).
For an example of method and constructor usage but using the DefaultStrategy
strategy, consult that strategy’s
documentation.
The annotation attribute forClass
is not supported for this strategy.
@groovy.transform.AutoImplement
The @AutoImplement
AST transformation supplies dummy implementations for any found abstract methods from
superclasses or interfaces. The dummy implementation is the same for all abstract methods found and can be:
-
essentially empty (exactly true for void methods and for methods with a return type, returns the default value for that type)
-
a statement that throws a specified exception (with optional message)
-
some user supplied code
The first example illustrates the default case. Our class is annotated with @AutoImplement
,
has a superclass and a single interface as can be seen here:
import groovy.transform.AutoImplement
@AutoImplement
class MyNames extends AbstractList<String> implements Closeable { }
A void close()
method from the
Closeable
interface is supplied and left empty. Implementations are also supplied
for the three abstract methods from the super class. The get
, addAll
and size
methods
have return types of String
, boolean
and int
respectively with default values
null
, false
and 0
. We can use our class (and check the expected return type for one
of the methods) using the following code:
assert new MyNames().size() == 0
It is also worthwhile examining the equivalent generated code:
class MyNames implements Closeable extends AbstractList<String> {
String get(int param0) {
return null
}
boolean addAll(Collection<? extends String> param0) {
return false
}
void close() throws Exception {
}
int size() {
return 0
}
}
The second example illustrates the simplest exception case. Our class is annotated with @AutoImplement
,
has a superclass and an annotation attribute indicates that an IOException
should be thrown if any of
our "dummy" methods are called. Here is the class definition:
@AutoImplement(exception=IOException)
class MyWriter extends Writer { }
We can use the class (and check the expected exception is thrown for one of the methods) using the following code:
import static groovy.test.GroovyAssert.shouldFail
shouldFail(IOException) {
new MyWriter().flush()
}
It is also worthwhile examining the equivalent generated code where three void methods have been provided all of which throw the supplied exception:
class MyWriter extends Writer {
void flush() throws IOException {
throw new IOException()
}
void write(char[] param0, int param1, int param2) throws IOException {
throw new IOException()
}
void close() throws Exception {
throw new IOException()
}
}
The third example illustrates the exception case with a supplied message. Our class is annotated with @AutoImplement
,
implements an interface, and has annotation attributes to indicate that an UnsupportedOperationException
with
Not supported by MyIterator
as the message should be thrown for any supplied methods. Here is the class definition:
@AutoImplement(exception=UnsupportedOperationException, message='Not supported by MyIterator')
class MyIterator implements Iterator<String> { }
We can use the class (and check the expected exception is thrown and has the correct message for one of the methods) using the following code:
def ex = shouldFail(UnsupportedOperationException) {
new MyIterator().hasNext()
}
assert ex.message == 'Not supported by MyIterator'
It is also worthwhile examining the equivalent generated code where three void methods have been provided all of which throw the supplied exception:
class MyIterator implements Iterator<String> {
boolean hasNext() {
throw new UnsupportedOperationException('Not supported by MyIterator')
}
String next() {
throw new UnsupportedOperationException('Not supported by MyIterator')
}
}
The fourth example illustrates the case of user supplied code. Our class is annotated with @AutoImplement
,
implements an interface, has an explcitly overriden hasNext
method, and has an annotation attribute containing the
supplied code for any supplied methods. Here is the class definition:
@AutoImplement(code = { throw new UnsupportedOperationException('Should never be called but was called on ' + new Date()) })
class EmptyIterator implements Iterator<String> {
boolean hasNext() { false }
}
We can use the class (and check the expected exception is thrown and has a message of the expected form) using the following code:
def ex = shouldFail(UnsupportedOperationException) {
new EmptyIterator().next()
}
assert ex.message.startsWith('Should never be called but was called on ')
It is also worthwhile examining the equivalent generated code where the next
method has been supplied:
class EmptyIterator implements java.util.Iterator<String> {
boolean hasNext() {
false
}
String next() {
throw new UnsupportedOperationException('Should never be called but was called on ' + new Date())
}
}
@groovy.transform.NullCheck
The @NullCheck
AST transformation adds null-check guard statements to constructors and methods
which cause those methods to fail early when supplied with null arguments.
It can be seen as a form of defensive programming.
The annotation can be added to individual methods or constructors, or to the class
in which case it will apply to all methods/constructors.
@NullCheck
String longerOf(String first, String second) {
first.size() >= second.size() ? first : second
}
assert longerOf('cat', 'canary') == 'canary'
def ex = shouldFail(IllegalArgumentException) {
longerOf('cat', null)
}
assert ex.message == 'second cannot be null'
Class design annotations
This category of annotations are aimed at simplifying the implementation of well-known design patterns (delegation, singleton, …) by using a declarative style.
@groovy.transform.BaseScript
@BaseScript
is used within scripts to indicate that the script should
extend fron a custom script base class rather than groovy.lang.Script
.
See the documentation for domain specific languages for further details.
@groovy.lang.Delegate
The @Delegate
AST transformation aims at implementing the delegation design pattern. In the following class:
class Event {
@Delegate Date when
String title
}
The when
property is annotated with @Delegate
, meaning that the Event
class will delegate calls to Date
methods
to the when
property. In this case, the generated code looks like this:
class Event {
Date when
String title
boolean before(Date other) {
when.before(other)
}
// ...
}
Then you can call the before
method, for example, directly on the Event
class:
def ev = new Event(title:'Groovy keynote', when: Date.parse('yyyy/MM/dd', '2013/09/10'))
def now = new Date()
assert ev.before(now)
Instead of annotating a property (or field), you can also annotate a method. In this case, the method can be thought of as a getter or factory method for the delegate. As an example, here is a class which (rather unusually) has a pool of delegates which are accessed in a round-robin fashion:
class Test {
private int robinCount = 0
private List<List> items = [[0], [1], [2]]
@Delegate
List getRoundRobinList() {
items[robinCount++ % items.size()]
}
void checkItems(List<List> testValue) {
assert items == testValue
}
}
Here is an example usage of that class:
def t = new Test()
t << 'fee'
t << 'fi'
t << 'fo'
t << 'fum'
t.checkItems([[0, 'fee', 'fum'], [1, 'fi'], [2, 'fo']])
Using a standard list in this round-robin fashion would violate many expected properties of lists, so don’t expect the above class to do anything useful beyond this trivial example.
The behavior of the @Delegate
AST transformation can be changed using the following parameters:
Attribute | Default value | Description | Example |
---|---|---|---|
interfaces |
True |
Should the interfaces implemented by the field be implemented by the class too |
|
deprecated |
false |
If true, also delegates methods annotated with @Deprecated |
|
methodAnnotations |
False |
Whether to carry over annotations from the methods of the delegate to your delegating method. |
|
parameterAnnotations |
False |
Whether to carry over annotations from the method parameters of the delegate to your delegating method. |
|
excludes |
Empty array |
A list of methods to be excluded from delegation. For more fine-grained control, see also |
|
includes |
Undefined marker array (indicates all methods) |
A list of methods to be included in delegation. For more
fine-grained
control, see also |
|
excludeTypes |
Empty array |
A list of interfaces containing method signatures to be excluded from delegation |
|
includeTypes |
Undefined marker array (indicates no list be default) |
A list of interfaces containing method signatures to be included in delegation |
|
allNames |
False |
Should the delegate pattern be also applied to methods with internal names |
|
@groovy.transform.Immutable
The @Immutable
meta-annotation combines the following annotations:
The @Immutable
meta-annotation simplifies the creation of immutable classes. Immutable classes are useful
since they are often easier to reason about and are inherently thread-safe.
See Effective Java, Minimize Mutability for all the details
about how to achieve immutable classes in Java. The @Immutable
meta-annotation does most of the things described
in Effective Java for you automatically.
To use the meta-annotation, all you have to do is annotate the class like in the following example:
import groovy.transform.Immutable
@Immutable
class Point {
int x
int y
}
One of the requirements for immutable classes is that there is no way to modify any state information within the class.
One requirement to achieve this is to use immutable classes for each property or alternatively perform special coding
such as defensive copy in and defensive copy out for any mutable properties within the constructors
and property getters. Between @ImmutableBase
, @MapConstructor
and @TupleConstructor
properties
are either identified as immutable or the special coding for numerous known cases is handled automatically.
Various mechanisms are provided for you to extend the handled property types which are allowed. See
@ImmutableOptions
and @KnownImmutable
for details.
The results of applying @Immutable
to a class are pretty similar to those of
applying the @Canonical meta-annotation but the generated class will have extra
logic to handle immutability. You will observe this by, for instance, trying to modify a property
which will result in a ReadOnlyPropertyException
being thrown since the backing field for the property
will have been automatically made final.
The @Immutable
meta-annotation supports the configuration options found in the annotations
it aggregates. See those annotations for more details.
@groovy.transform.ImmutableBase
Immutable classes generated with @ImmutableBase
are automatically made final. Also, the type of each property is checked
and various checks are made on the class, for example, public instance fields currently aren’t allowed. It also generates
a copyWith
constructor if desired.
The following annotation attribute is supported:
Attribute | Default value | Description | Example |
---|---|---|---|
copyWith |
false |
A boolean whether to generate a |
|
@groovy.transform.PropertyOptions
This annotation allows you to specify a custom property handler to be used by transformations
during class construction. It is ignored by the main Groovy compiler but is referenced by other transformations
like @TupleConstructor
, @MapConstructor
, and @ImmutableBase
. It is frequently used behind the
scenes by the @Immutable
meta-annotation.
@groovy.transform.VisibilityOptions
This annotation allows you to specify a custom visibility for a construct generated by another transformation.
It is ignored by the main Groovy compiler but is referenced by other transformations
like @TupleConstructor
, @MapConstructor
, and @NamedVariant
.
@groovy.transform.ImmutableOptions
Groovy’s immutability support relies on a predefined list of known immutable classes (like java.net.URI
or java.lang.String
and fails if you use a type which is not in that list, you are allowed to add to the list of known immutable types
thanks to the following annotation attributes of the @ImmutableOptions
annotation:
Attribute | Default value | Description | Example |
---|---|---|---|
knownImmutableClasses |
Empty list |
A list of classes which are deemed immutable. |
|
knownImmutables |
Empty list |
A list of property names which are deemed immutable. |
|
If you deem a type as immutable and it isn’t one of the ones automatically handled, then it is up to you to correctly code that class to ensure immutability.
@groovy.transform.KnownImmutable
The @KnownImmutable
annotation isn’t actually one that triggers any AST transformations. It is simply
a marker annotation. You can annotate your classes with the annotation (including Java classes) and they
will be recognized as acceptable types for members within an immutable class. This saves you having to
explicitly use the knownImmutables
or knownImmutableClasses
annotation attributes from @ImmutableOptions
.
@groovy.transform.Memoized
The @Memoized
AST transformations simplifies the implementation of caching by allowing the result of method calls
to be cached just by annotating the method with @Memoized
. Let’s imagine the following method:
long longComputation(int seed) {
// slow computation
Thread.sleep(100*seed)
System.nanoTime()
}
This emulates a long computation, based on the actual parameters of the method. Without @Memoized
, each method call
would take several seconds plus it would return a random result:
def x = longComputation(1)
def y = longComputation(1)
assert x!=y
Adding @Memoized
changes the semantics of the method by adding caching, based on the parameters:
@Memoized
long longComputation(int seed) {
// slow computation
Thread.sleep(100*seed)
System.nanoTime()
}
def x = longComputation(1) // returns after 100 milliseconds
def y = longComputation(1) // returns immediatly
def z = longComputation(2) // returns after 200 milliseconds
assert x==y
assert x!=z
The size of the cache can be configured using two optional parameters:
-
protectedCacheSize: the number of results which are guaranteed not to be cleared after garbage collection
-
maxCacheSize: the maximum number of results that can be kept in memory
By default, the size of the cache is unlimited and no cache result is protected from garbage collection. Setting a protectedCacheSize>0 would create an unlimited cache with some results protected. Setting maxCacheSize>0 would create a limited cache but without any protection from garbage protection. Setting both would create a limited, protected cache.
@groovy.transform.TailRecursive
The @TailRecursive
annotation can be used to automatically transform a recursive call at the end of a method
into an equivalent iterative version of the same code. This avoids stack overflow due to too many recursive calls.
Below is an example of use when calculating factorial:
import groovy.transform.CompileStatic
import groovy.transform.TailRecursive
@CompileStatic
class Factorial {
@TailRecursive
static BigInteger factorial( BigInteger i, BigInteger product = 1) {
if( i == 1) {
return product
}
return factorial(i-1, product*i)
}
}
assert Factorial.factorial(1) == 1
assert Factorial.factorial(3) == 6
assert Factorial.factorial(5) == 120
assert Factorial.factorial(50000).toString().size() == 213237 // Big number and no Stack Overflow
Currently, the annotation will only work for self-recursive method calls, i.e. a single recursive call to the exact same method again.
Consider using Closures and trampoline()
if you have a scenario involving simple mutual recursion.
Also note that only non-void methods are currently handled (void calls will result in a compilation error).
Currently, some forms of method overloading can trick the compiler, and some non-tail recursive calls are erroneously treated as tail recursive. |
@groovy.lang.Singleton
The @Singleton
annotation can be used to implement the singleton design pattern on a class. The singleton instance
is defined eagerly by default, using class initialization, or lazily, in which case the field is initialized using
double checked locking.
@Singleton
class GreetingService {
String greeting(String name) { "Hello, $name!" }
}
assert GreetingService.instance.greeting('Bob') == 'Hello, Bob!'
By default, the singleton is created eagerly when the class is initialized and available through the instance
property.
It is possible to change the name of the singleton using the property
parameter:
@Singleton(property='theOne')
class GreetingService {
String greeting(String name) { "Hello, $name!" }
}
assert GreetingService.theOne.greeting('Bob') == 'Hello, Bob!'
And it is also possible to make initialization lazy using the lazy
parameter:
class Collaborator {
public static boolean init = false
}
@Singleton(lazy=true,strict=false)
class GreetingService {
static void init() {}
GreetingService() {
Collaborator.init = true
}
String greeting(String name) { "Hello, $name!" }
}
GreetingService.init() // make sure class is initialized
assert Collaborator.init == false
GreetingService.instance
assert Collaborator.init == true
assert GreetingService.instance.greeting('Bob') == 'Hello, Bob!'
In this example, we also set the strict
parameter to false, which allows us to define our own constructor.
Logging improvements
Groovy provides AST transformation that helps integrating with the most widely used logging frameworks. It’s worth noting that annotating a class with one of those annotations doesn’t prevent you from adding the appropriate logging framework on classpath.
All transformations work in a similar way:
-
add static final
log
field corresponding to the logger -
wrap all calls to
log.level()
into the appropriatelog.isLevelEnabled
guard, depending on the underlying framework
Those transformations support two parameters:
-
value
(defaultlog
) corresponds to the name of the logger field -
category
(defaults to the class name) is the name of the logger category
@groovy.util.logging.Log
The first logging AST transformation available is the @Log
annotation which relies on the JDK logging framework. Writing:
@groovy.util.logging.Log
class Greeter {
void greet() {
log.info 'Called greeter'
println 'Hello, world!'
}
}
is equivalent to writing:
import java.util.logging.Level
import java.util.logging.Logger
class Greeter {
private static final Logger log = Logger.getLogger(Greeter.name)
void greet() {
if (log.isLoggable(Level.INFO)) {
log.info 'Called greeter'
}
println 'Hello, world!'
}
}
@groovy.util.logging.Commons
Groovy supports the Apache Commons Logging framework using to the
@Commons
annotation. Writing:
@groovy.util.logging.Commons
class Greeter {
void greet() {
log.debug 'Called greeter'
println 'Hello, world!'
}
}
is equivalent to writing:
import org.apache.commons.logging.LogFactory
import org.apache.commons.logging.Log
class Greeter {
private static final Log log = LogFactory.getLog(Greeter)
void greet() {
if (log.isDebugEnabled()) {
log.debug 'Called greeter'
}
println 'Hello, world!'
}
}
@groovy.util.logging.Log4j
Groovy supports the Apache Log4j 1.x framework using to the
@Log4j
annotation. Writing:
@groovy.util.logging.Log4j
class Greeter {
void greet() {
log.debug 'Called greeter'
println 'Hello, world!'
}
}
is equivalent to writing:
import org.apache.log4j.Logger
class Greeter {
private static final Logger log = Logger.getLogger(Greeter)
void greet() {
if (log.isDebugEnabled()) {
log.debug 'Called greeter'
}
println 'Hello, world!'
}
}
@groovy.util.logging.Log4j2
Groovy supports the Apache Log4j 2.x framework using to the
@Log4j2
annotation. Writing:
@groovy.util.logging.Log4j2
class Greeter {
void greet() {
log.debug 'Called greeter'
println 'Hello, world!'
}
}
is equivalent to writing:
import org.apache.logging.log4j.LogManager
import org.apache.logging.log4j.Logger
class Greeter {
private static final Logger log = LogManager.getLogger(Greeter)
void greet() {
if (log.isDebugEnabled()) {
log.debug 'Called greeter'
}
println 'Hello, world!'
}
}
@groovy.util.logging.Slf4j
Groovy supports the Simple Logging Facade for Java (SLF4J) framework using to the
@Slf4j
annotation. Writing:
@groovy.util.logging.Slf4j
class Greeter {
void greet() {
log.debug 'Called greeter'
println 'Hello, world!'
}
}
is equivalent to writing:
import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory
import org.slf4j.Logger
class Greeter {
private static final Logger log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(Greeter)
void greet() {
if (log.isDebugEnabled()) {
log.debug 'Called greeter'
}
println 'Hello, world!'
}
}
Declarative concurrency
The Groovy language provides a set of annotations aimed at simplifying common concurrency patterns in a declarative approach.
@groovy.transform.Synchronized
The @Synchronized
AST transformations works in a similar way to the synchronized
keyword but locks on different
objects for safer concurrency. It can be applied on any method or static method:
import groovy.transform.Synchronized
import java.util.concurrent.Executors
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit
class Counter {
int cpt
@Synchronized
int incrementAndGet() {
cpt++
}
int get() {
cpt
}
}
Writing this is equivalent to creating a lock object and wrapping the whole method into a synchronized block:
class Counter {
int cpt
private final Object $lock = new Object()
int incrementAndGet() {
synchronized($lock) {
cpt++
}
}
int get() {
cpt
}
}
By default, @Synchronized
creates a field named $lock
(or $LOCK
for a static method) but you can make it use any
field you want by specifying the value attribute, like in the following example:
import groovy.transform.Synchronized
import java.util.concurrent.Executors
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit
class Counter {
int cpt
private final Object myLock = new Object()
@Synchronized('myLock')
int incrementAndGet() {
cpt++
}
int get() {
cpt
}
}
@groovy.transform.WithReadLock
and @groovy.transform.WithWriteLock
The @WithReadLock
AST transformation works in conjunction with the @WithWriteLock
transformation
to provide read/write synchronization using the ReentrantReadWriteLock
facility that the JDK provides. The annotation
can be added to a method or a static method. It will transparently create a $reentrantLock
final field (or
$REENTRANTLOCK
for a static method) and proper synchronization code will be added. For example, the following code:
import groovy.transform.WithReadLock
import groovy.transform.WithWriteLock
class Counters {
public final Map<String,Integer> map = [:].withDefault { 0 }
@WithReadLock
int get(String id) {
map.get(id)
}
@WithWriteLock
void add(String id, int num) {
Thread.sleep(200) // emulate long computation
map.put(id, map.get(id)+num)
}
}
is equivalent to this:
import groovy.transform.WithReadLock as WithReadLock
import groovy.transform.WithWriteLock as WithWriteLock
public class Counters {
private final Map<String, Integer> map
private final java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantReadWriteLock $reentrantlock
public int get(java.lang.String id) {
$reentrantlock.readLock().lock()
try {
map.get(id)
}
finally {
$reentrantlock.readLock().unlock()
}
}
public void add(java.lang.String id, int num) {
$reentrantlock.writeLock().lock()
try {
java.lang.Thread.sleep(200)
map.put(id, map.get(id) + num )
}
finally {
$reentrantlock.writeLock().unlock()
}
}
}
Both @WithReadLock
and @WithWriteLock
support specifying an alternative lock object. In that case, the referenced
field must be declared by the user, like in the following alternative:
import groovy.transform.WithReadLock
import groovy.transform.WithWriteLock
import java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantReadWriteLock
class Counters {
public final Map<String,Integer> map = [:].withDefault { 0 }
private final ReentrantReadWriteLock customLock = new ReentrantReadWriteLock()
@WithReadLock('customLock')
int get(String id) {
map.get(id)
}
@WithWriteLock('customLock')
void add(String id, int num) {
Thread.sleep(200) // emulate long computation
map.put(id, map.get(id)+num)
}
}
For details
-
See Javadoc for groovy.transform.WithReadLock
-
See Javadoc for groovy.transform.WithWriteLock
Easier cloning and externalizing
Groovy provides two annotations aimed at facilitating the implementation of Cloneable
and Externalizable
interfaces,
respectively named @AutoClone
and @AutoExternalize
.
@groovy.transform.AutoClone
The @AutoClone
annotation is aimed at implementing the @java.lang.Cloneable
interface using various strategies, thanks to the style
parameter:
-
the default
AutoCloneStyle.CLONE
strategy callssuper.clone()
first thenclone()
on each cloneable property -
the
AutoCloneStyle.SIMPLE
strategy uses a regular constructor call and copies properties from the source to the clone -
the
AutoCloneStyle.COPY_CONSTRUCTOR
strategy creates and uses a copy constructor -
the
AutoCloneStyle.SERIALIZATION
strategy uses serialization (or externalization) to clone the object
Each of those strategies have pros and cons which are discussed in the Javadoc for groovy.transform.AutoClone and groovy.transform.AutoCloneStyle .
For example, the following example:
import groovy.transform.AutoClone
@AutoClone
class Book {
String isbn
String title
List<String> authors
Date publicationDate
}
is equivalent to this:
class Book implements Cloneable {
String isbn
String title
List<String> authors
Date publicationDate
public Book clone() throws CloneNotSupportedException {
Book result = super.clone()
result.authors = authors instanceof Cloneable ? (List) authors.clone() : authors
result.publicationDate = publicationDate.clone()
result
}
}
Note that the String properties aren’t explicitly handled because Strings are immutable and the clone()
method from Object
will copy the String references. The same would apply to primitive fields and most of the concrete subclasses of java.lang.Number
.
In addition to cloning styles, @AutoClone
supports multiple options:
Attribute | Default value | Description | Example |
---|---|---|---|
excludes |
Empty list |
A list of property or field names that need to be excluded from cloning. A string consisting of a comma-separated field/property names is also allowed. See groovy.transform.AutoClone#excludes for details |
|
includeFields |
false |
By default, only properties are cloned. Setting this flag to true will also clone fields. |
|
@groovy.transform.AutoExternalize
The @AutoExternalize
AST transformation will assist in the creation of java.io.Externalizable
classes. It will
automatically add the interface to the class and generate the writeExternal
and readExternal
methods. For example, this
code:
import groovy.transform.AutoExternalize
@AutoExternalize
class Book {
String isbn
String title
float price
}
will be converted into:
class Book implements java.io.Externalizable {
String isbn
String title
float price
void writeExternal(ObjectOutput out) throws IOException {
out.writeObject(isbn)
out.writeObject(title)
out.writeFloat( price )
}
public void readExternal(ObjectInput oin) {
isbn = (String) oin.readObject()
title = (String) oin.readObject()
price = oin.readFloat()
}
}
The @AutoExternalize
annotation supports two parameters which will let you slightly customize its behavior:
Attribute | Default value | Description | Example |
---|---|---|---|
excludes |
Empty list |
A list of property or field names that need to be excluded from externalizing. A string consisting of a comma-separated field/property names is also allowed. See groovy.transform.AutoExternalize#excludes for details |
|
includeFields |
false |
By default, only properties are externalized. Setting this flag to true will also clone fields. |
|
Safer scripting
The Groovy language makes it easy to execute user scripts at runtime (for example using groovy.lang.GroovyShell), but how do you make sure that a script won’t eat all CPU (infinite loops) or that concurrent scripts won’t slowly consume all available threads of a thread pool? Groovy provides several annotations which are aimed towards safer scripting, generating code which will for example allow you to interrupt execution automatically.
@groovy.transform.ThreadInterrupt
One complicated situation in the JVM world is when a thread can’t be stopped. The Thread#stop
method exists but is
deprecated (and isn’t reliable) so your only chance relies in Thread#interrupt
. Calling the latter will set the
interrupt
flag on the thread, but it will not stop the execution of the thread. This is problematic because it’s the
responsibility of the code executing in the thread to check the interrupt flag and properly exit. This makes sense when
you, as a developer, know that the code you are executing is meant to be run in an independent thread, but in general,
you don’t know it. It’s even worse with user scripts, who might not even know what a thread is (think of DSLs).
@ThreadInterrupt
simplifies this by adding thread interruption checks at critical places in the code:
-
loops (for, while)
-
first instruction of a method
-
first instruction of a closure body
Let’s imagine the following user script:
while (true) {
i++
}
This is an obvious infinite loop. If this code executes in its own thread, interrupting wouldn’t help: if you join
on
the thread, then the calling code would be able to continue, but the thread would still be alive, running in background
without any ability for you to stop it, slowly causing thread starvation.
One possibility to work around this is to set up your shell this way:
def config = new CompilerConfiguration()
config.addCompilationCustomizers(
new ASTTransformationCustomizer(ThreadInterrupt)
)
def binding = new Binding(i:0)
def shell = new GroovyShell(binding,config)
The shell is then configured to automatically apply the @ThreadInterrupt
AST transformations on all scripts. This allows
you to execute user scripts this way:
def t = Thread.start {
shell.evaluate(userCode)
}
t.join(1000) // give at most 1000ms for the script to complete
if (t.alive) {
t.interrupt()
}
The transformation automatically modified user code like this:
while (true) {
if (Thread.currentThread().interrupted) {
throw new InterruptedException('The current thread has been interrupted.')
}
i++
}
The check which is introduced inside the loop guarantees that if the interrupt
flag is set on the current thread, an
exception will be thrown, interrupting the execution of the thread.
@ThreadInterrupt
supports multiple options that will let you further customize the behavior of the transformation:
Attribute | Default value | Description | Example |
---|---|---|---|
thrown |
|
Specifies the type of exception which is thrown if the thread is interrupted. |
|
checkOnMethodStart |
true |
Should an interruption check be inserted at the beginning of each method body. See groovy.transform.ThreadInterrupt for details. |
|
applyToAllClasses |
true |
Should the transformation be applied on all classes of the same source unit (in the same source file). See groovy.transform.ThreadInterrupt for details. |
|
applyToAllMembers |
true |
Should the transformation be applied on all members of class. See groovy.transform.ThreadInterrupt for details. |
|
@groovy.transform.TimedInterrupt
The @TimedInterrupt
AST transformation tries to solve a slightly different problem from @groovy.transform.ThreadInterrupt
: instead of checking the interrupt
flag of the thread, it will automatically
throw an exception if the thread has been running for too long.
This annotation does not spawn a monitoring thread. Instead, it works in a similar manner as @ThreadInterrupt by placing checks at appropriate places in the code. This means that if you
have a thread blocked by I/O, it will not be interrupted.
|
Imagine the following user code:
def fib(int n) { n<2?n:fib(n-1)+fib(n-2) }
result = fib(600)
The implementation of the famous Fibonacci number computation here is far from optimized. If it is called with a high n
value, it can take minutes to answer. With @TimedInterrupt
, you can
choose how long a script is allowed to run. The following setup code will allow the user script to run for 1 second at max:
def config = new CompilerConfiguration()
config.addCompilationCustomizers(
new ASTTransformationCustomizer(value:1, TimedInterrupt)
)
def binding = new Binding(result:0)
def shell = new GroovyShell(this.class.classLoader, binding,config)
This code is equivalent to annotating a class with @TimedInterrupt
like this:
@TimedInterrupt(value=1, unit=TimeUnit.SECONDS)
class MyClass {
def fib(int n) {
n<2?n:fib(n-1)+fib(n-2)
}
}
@TimedInterrupt
supports multiple options that will let you further customize the behavior of the transformation:
Attribute | Default value | Description | Example |
---|---|---|---|
value |
Long.MAX_VALUE |
Used in combination with |
|
unit |
TimeUnit.SECONDS |
Used in combination with |
|
thrown |
|
Specifies the type of exception which is thrown if timeout is reached. |
|
checkOnMethodStart |
true |
Should an interruption check be inserted at the beginning of each method body. See groovy.transform.TimedInterrupt for details. |
|
applyToAllClasses |
true |
Should the transformation be applied on all classes of the same source unit (in the same source file). See groovy.transform.TimedInterrupt for details. |
|
applyToAllMembers |
true |
Should the transformation be applied on all members of class. See groovy.transform.TimedInterrupt for details. |
|
@TimedInterrupt is currently not compatible with static methods!
|
@groovy.transform.ConditionalInterrupt
The last annotation for safer scripting is the base annotation when you want to interrupt a script using a custom strategy. In particular, this is the annotation of choice if you
want to use resource management (limit the number of calls to an API, …). In the following example, user code is using an infinite loop, but @ConditionalInterrupt
will allow us
to check a quota manager and interrupt automatically the script:
@ConditionalInterrupt({Quotas.disallow('user')})
class UserCode {
void doSomething() {
int i=0
while (true) {
println "Consuming resources ${++i}"
}
}
}
The quota checking is very basic here, but it can be any code:
class Quotas {
static def quotas = [:].withDefault { 10 }
static boolean disallow(String userName) {
println "Checking quota for $userName"
(quotas[userName]--)<0
}
}
We can make sure @ConditionalInterrupt
works properly using this test code:
assert Quotas.quotas['user'] == 10
def t = Thread.start {
new UserCode().doSomething()
}
t.join(5000)
assert !t.alive
assert Quotas.quotas['user'] < 0
Of course, in practice, it is unlikely that @ConditionalInterrupt
will be itself added by hand on user code. It can be injected in a similar manner as the example shown in the
ThreadInterrupt section, using the org.codehaus.groovy.control.customizers.ASTTransformationCustomizer :
def config = new CompilerConfiguration()
def checkExpression = new ClosureExpression(
Parameter.EMPTY_ARRAY,
new ExpressionStatement(
new MethodCallExpression(new ClassExpression(ClassHelper.make(Quotas)), 'disallow', new ConstantExpression('user'))
)
)
config.addCompilationCustomizers(
new ASTTransformationCustomizer(value: checkExpression, ConditionalInterrupt)
)
def shell = new GroovyShell(this.class.classLoader,new Binding(),config)
def userCode = """
int i=0
while (true) {
println "Consuming resources \\${++i}"
}
"""
assert Quotas.quotas['user'] == 10
def t = Thread.start {
shell.evaluate(userCode)
}
t.join(5000)
assert !t.alive
assert Quotas.quotas['user'] < 0
@ConditionalInterrupt
supports multiple options that will let you further customize the behavior of the transformation:
Attribute | Default value | Description | Example |
---|---|---|---|
value |
The closure which will be called to check if execution is allowed. If the closure returns false, execution is allowed. If it returns true, then an exception will be thrown. |
|
|
thrown |
|
Specifies the type of exception which is thrown if execution should be aborted. |
|
checkOnMethodStart |
true |
Should an interruption check be inserted at the beginning of each method body. See groovy.transform.ConditionalInterrupt for details. |
|
applyToAllClasses |
true |
Should the transformation be applied on all classes of the same source unit (in the same source file). See groovy.transform.ConditionalInterrupt for details. |
|
applyToAllMembers |
true |
Should the transformation be applied on all members of class. See groovy.transform.ConditionalInterrupt for details. |
|
Compiler directives
This category of AST transformations groups annotations which have a direct impact on the semantics of the code, rather than focusing on code generation. With that regards, they can be seen as compiler directives that either change the behavior of a program at compile time or runtime.
@groovy.transform.Field
The @Field
annotation only makes sense in the context of a script and aims at solving a common scoping error with
scripts. The following example will for example fail at runtime:
def x
String line() {
"="*x
}
x=3
assert "===" == line()
x=5
assert "=====" == line()
The error that is thrown may be difficult to interpret: groovy.lang.MissingPropertyException: No such property: x. The reason is that scripts are compiled to classes and the script body is itself compiled as a single run() method. Methods which are defined in the scripts are independent, so the code above is equivalent to this:
class MyScript extends Script {
String line() {
"="*x
}
public def run() {
def x
x=3
assert "===" == line()
x=5
assert "=====" == line()
}
}
So def x
is effectively interpreted as a local variable, outside of the scope of the line
method. The @Field
AST transformation aims at fixing this
by changing the scope of the variable to a field of the enclosing script:
@Field def x
String line() {
"="*x
}
x=3
assert "===" == line()
x=5
assert "=====" == line()
The resulting, equivalent, code is now:
class MyScript extends Script {
def x
String line() {
"="*x
}
public def run() {
x=3
assert "===" == line()
x=5
assert "=====" == line()
}
}
@groovy.transform.PackageScope
By default, Groovy visibility rules imply that if you create a field without specifying a modifier, then the field is interpreted as a property:
class Person {
String name // this is a property
}
Should you want to create a package private field instead of a property (private field+getter/setter), then annotate your field with @PackageScope
:
class Person {
@PackageScope String name // not a property anymore
}
The @PackageScope
annotation can also be used for classes, methods and constructors. In addition, by specifying a list
of PackageScopeTarget
values as the annotation attribute at the class level, all members within that class that don’t
have an explicit modifier and match the provided PackageScopeTarget
will remain package protected. For example to apply
to fields within a class use the following annotation:
import static groovy.transform.PackageScopeTarget.FIELDS
@PackageScope(FIELDS)
class Person {
String name // not a property, package protected
Date dob // not a property, package protected
private int age // explicit modifier, so won't be touched
}
The @PackageScope
annotation is seldom used as part of normal Groovy conventions but is sometimes useful
for factory methods that should be visible internally within a package or for methods or constructors provided
for testing purposes, or when integrating with third-party libraries which require such visibility conventions.
@groovy.transform.AutoFinal
The @AutoFinal
annotation instructs the compiler to automatically insert the final modifier
in numerous places within the annotated node. If applied on a method (or constructor), the parameters
for that method (or constructor) will be marked as final. If applied on a class definition, the same
treatment will occur for all declared methods and constructors within that class.
It is often considered bad practice to reassign parameters of a method or constructor with its body.
By adding the final modifier to all parameter declarations you can avoid this practice entirely.
Some programmers feel that adding final everywhere increases the amount of boilerplate code and makes the
method signatures somewhat noisy. An alternative might instead be to use a code review process or apply
a codenarc rule
to give warnings if that practice is observed but these alternatives might lead to delayed feedback during
quality checking rather than within the IDE or during compilation. The @AutoFinal
annotation aims to
maximise compiler/IDE feedback while retaining succinct code with minimum boilerplate noise.
The following example illustrates applying the annotation at the class level:
import groovy.transform.AutoFinal
@AutoFinal
class Person {
private String first, last
Person(String first, String last) {
this.first = first
this.last = last
}
String fullName(String separator) {
"$first$separator$last"
}
String greeting(String salutation) {
"$salutation, $first"
}
}
In this example, the two parameters for the constructor and the single parameter for
both the fullname
and greeting
methods will be final. Attempts to modify those parameters within the
constructor or method bodies will be flagged by the compiler.
The following example illustrates applying the annotation at the method level:
class Calc {
@AutoFinal
int add(int a, int b) { a + b }
int mult(int a, int b) { a * b }
}
Here, the add
method will have final parameters but the mult
method will remain unchanged.
@groovy.transform.AnnotationCollector
@AnnotationCollector
allows the creation of meta-annotations, which are described in a dedicated section.
@groovy.transform.TypeChecked
@TypeChecked
activates compile-time type checking on your Groovy code. See section on type checking for details.
@groovy.transform.CompileStatic
@CompileStatic
activates static compilation on your Groovy code. See section on type checking for details.
@groovy.transform.CompileDynamic
@CompileDynamic
disables static compilation on parts of your Groovy code. See section on type checking for details.
@groovy.lang.DelegatesTo
@DelegatesTo
is not, technically speaking, an AST transformation. It is aimed at documenting code and helping the compiler in case you are
using type checking or static compilation. The annotation is described thoroughly in the
DSL section of this guide.
@groovy.transform.SelfType
@SelfType
is not an AST transformation but rather a marker interface used
with traits. See the traits documentation for further details.
Swing patterns
@groovy.beans.Bindable
@Bindable
is an AST transformation that transforms a regular property into a bound property (according to the JavaBeans specification).
The @Bindable
annotation can be placed on a property or a class. To convert all properties of a class into bound properties, on can annotate the class like in this example:
import groovy.beans.Bindable
@Bindable
class Person {
String name
int age
}
This is equivalent to writing this:
import java.beans.PropertyChangeListener
import java.beans.PropertyChangeSupport
class Person {
final private PropertyChangeSupport this$propertyChangeSupport
String name
int age
public void addPropertyChangeListener(PropertyChangeListener listener) {
this$propertyChangeSupport.addPropertyChangeListener(listener)
}
public void addPropertyChangeListener(String name, PropertyChangeListener listener) {
this$propertyChangeSupport.addPropertyChangeListener(name, listener)
}
public void removePropertyChangeListener(PropertyChangeListener listener) {
this$propertyChangeSupport.removePropertyChangeListener(listener)
}
public void removePropertyChangeListener(String name, PropertyChangeListener listener) {
this$propertyChangeSupport.removePropertyChangeListener(name, listener)
}
public void firePropertyChange(String name, Object oldValue, Object newValue) {
this$propertyChangeSupport.firePropertyChange(name, oldValue, newValue)
}
public PropertyChangeListener[] getPropertyChangeListeners() {
return this$propertyChangeSupport.getPropertyChangeListeners()
}
public PropertyChangeListener[] getPropertyChangeListeners(String name) {
return this$propertyChangeSupport.getPropertyChangeListeners(name)
}
}
@Bindable
therefore removes a lot of boilerplate from your class, dramatically increasing readability. If the annotation is put on a single property, only that property is bound:
import groovy.beans.Bindable
class Person {
String name
@Bindable int age
}
@groovy.beans.ListenerList
The @ListenerList
AST transformation generates code for adding, removing and getting the list of listeners to a class, just by annotating a collection property:
import java.awt.event.ActionListener
import groovy.beans.ListenerList
class Component {
@ListenerList
List<ActionListener> listeners;
}
The transform will generate the appropriate add/remove methods based on the generic type of the list. In addition, it will also create fireXXX
methods based on the public methods declared on the class:
import java.awt.event.ActionEvent
import java.awt.event.ActionListener as ActionListener
import groovy.beans.ListenerList as ListenerList
public class Component {
@ListenerList
private List<ActionListener> listeners
public void addActionListener(ActionListener listener) {
if ( listener == null) {
return
}
if ( listeners == null) {
listeners = []
}
listeners.add(listener)
}
public void removeActionListener(ActionListener listener) {
if ( listener == null) {
return
}
if ( listeners == null) {
listeners = []
}
listeners.remove(listener)
}
public ActionListener[] getActionListeners() {
Object __result = []
if ( listeners != null) {
__result.addAll(listeners)
}
return (( __result ) as ActionListener[])
}
public void fireActionPerformed(ActionEvent param0) {
if ( listeners != null) {
ArrayList<ActionListener> __list = new ArrayList<ActionListener>(listeners)
for (def listener : __list ) {
listener.actionPerformed(param0)
}
}
}
}
@Bindable
supports multiple options that will let you further customize the behavior of the transformation:
Attribute | Default value | Description | Example |
---|---|---|---|
name |
Generic type name |
By default, the suffix which will be appended to add/remove/… methods is the simple class name of the generic type of the list. |
|
synchronize |
false |
If set to true, generated methods will be synchronized |
|
@groovy.beans.Vetoable
The @Vetoable
annotation works in a similar manner to @Bindable
but generates constrained property according to the JavaBeans specification, instead of bound properties. The annotation
can be placed on a class, meaning that all properties will be converted to constrained properties, or on a single property. For example, annotating this class with @Vetoable
:
import groovy.beans.Vetoable
import java.beans.PropertyVetoException
import java.beans.VetoableChangeListener
@Vetoable
class Person {
String name
int age
}
is equivalent to writing this:
public class Person {
private String name
private int age
final private java.beans.VetoableChangeSupport this$vetoableChangeSupport
public void addVetoableChangeListener(VetoableChangeListener listener) {
this$vetoableChangeSupport.addVetoableChangeListener(listener)
}
public void addVetoableChangeListener(String name, VetoableChangeListener listener) {
this$vetoableChangeSupport.addVetoableChangeListener(name, listener)
}
public void removeVetoableChangeListener(VetoableChangeListener listener) {
this$vetoableChangeSupport.removeVetoableChangeListener(listener)
}
public void removeVetoableChangeListener(String name, VetoableChangeListener listener) {
this$vetoableChangeSupport.removeVetoableChangeListener(name, listener)
}
public void fireVetoableChange(String name, Object oldValue, Object newValue) throws PropertyVetoException {
this$vetoableChangeSupport.fireVetoableChange(name, oldValue, newValue)
}
public VetoableChangeListener[] getVetoableChangeListeners() {
return this$vetoableChangeSupport.getVetoableChangeListeners()
}
public VetoableChangeListener[] getVetoableChangeListeners(String name) {
return this$vetoableChangeSupport.getVetoableChangeListeners(name)
}
public void setName(String value) throws PropertyVetoException {
this.fireVetoableChange('name', name, value)
name = value
}
public void setAge(int value) throws PropertyVetoException {
this.fireVetoableChange('age', age, value)
age = value
}
}
If the annotation is put on a single property, only that property is made vetoable:
import groovy.beans.Vetoable
class Person {
String name
@Vetoable int age
}
Test assistance
@groovy.test.NotYetImplemented
@NotYetImplemented
is used to invert the result of a JUnit 3/4 test case. It is in particular useful if a feature is not yet implemented but the test is. In that case, it is expected
that the test fails. Marking it with @NotYetImplemented
will inverse the result of the test, like in this example:
import groovy.test.GroovyTestCase
import groovy.test.NotYetImplemented
class Maths {
static int fib(int n) {
// todo: implement later
}
}
class MathsTest extends GroovyTestCase {
@NotYetImplemented
void testFib() {
def dataTable = [
1:1,
2:1,
3:2,
4:3,
5:5,
6:8,
7:13
]
dataTable.each { i, r ->
assert Maths.fib(i) == r
}
}
}
Another advantage of using this technique is that you can write test cases for bugs before knowing how to fix them. If some time in the future, a modification in the code fixes a bug by side effect, you’ll be notified because a test which was expected to fail passed.
@groovy.transform.ASTTest
@ASTTest
is a special AST transformation meant to help debugging other AST transformations or the Groovy compiler itself. It will let the developer "explore" the AST during compilation and
perform assertions on the AST rather than on the result of compilation. This means that this AST transformations gives access to the AST before the bytecode is produced. @ASTTest
can be
placed on any annotable node and requires two parameters:
-
phase: sets at which phase at which
@ASTTest
will be triggered. The test code will work on the AST tree at the end of this phase. -
value: the code which will be executed once the phase is reached, on the annotated node
Compile phase has to be chosen from one of org.codehaus.groovy.control.CompilePhase . However, since it is not possible to annotate a node twice with the same annotation, you will
not be able to use @ASTTest on the same node at two distinct compile phases.
|
value
is a closure expression which has access to a special variable node
corresponding to the annotated node, and a helper lookup
method which will be discussed here.
For example, you can annotate a class node like this:
import groovy.transform.ASTTest
import org.codehaus.groovy.ast.ClassNode
@ASTTest(phase=CONVERSION, value={ (1)
assert node instanceof ClassNode (2)
assert node.name == 'Person' (3)
})
class Person {
}
1 | we’re checking the state of the Abstract Syntax Tree after the CONVERSION phase |
2 | node refers to the AST node which is annotated by @ASTTest |
3 | it can be used to perform assertions at compile time |
One interesting feature of @ASTTest
is that if an assertion fails, then compilation will fail. Now imagine that we want to check the behavior of an AST transformation at compile time.
We will take @PackageScope
here, and we will want to verify that a property annotated with @PackageScope
becomes a package private field. For this, we have to know at which phase the
transform runs, which can be found in org.codehaus.groovy.transform.PackageScopeASTTransformation : semantic analysis. Then a test can be written like this:
import groovy.transform.ASTTest
import groovy.transform.PackageScope
@ASTTest(phase=SEMANTIC_ANALYSIS, value={
def nameNode = node.properties.find { it.name == 'name' }
def ageNode = node.properties.find { it.name == 'age' }
assert nameNode
assert ageNode == null // shouldn't be a property anymore
def ageField = node.getDeclaredField 'age'
assert ageField.modifiers == 0
})
class Person {
String name
@PackageScope int age
}
The @ASTTest
annotation can only be placed wherever the grammar allows it. Sometimes, you would like to test the contents of an AST node which is not annotable. In this case,
@ASTTest
provides a convenient lookup
method which will search the AST for nodes which are labelled with a special token:
def list = lookup('anchor') (1)
Statement stmt = list[0] (2)
1 | returns the list of AST nodes which label is 'anchor' |
2 | it is always necessary to choose which element to process since lookup always returns a list |
Imagine, for example, that you want to test the declared type of a for loop variable. Then you can do it like this:
import groovy.transform.ASTTest
import groovy.transform.PackageScope
import org.codehaus.groovy.ast.ClassHelper
import org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.DeclarationExpression
import org.codehaus.groovy.ast.stmt.ForStatement
class Something {
@ASTTest(phase=SEMANTIC_ANALYSIS, value={
def forLoop = lookup('anchor')[0]
assert forLoop instanceof ForStatement
def decl = forLoop.collectionExpression.expressions[0]
assert decl instanceof DeclarationExpression
assert decl.variableExpression.name == 'i'
assert decl.variableExpression.originType == ClassHelper.int_TYPE
})
void someMethod() {
int x = 1;
int y = 10;
anchor: for (int i=0; i<x+y; i++) {
println "$i"
}
}
}
@ASTTest
also exposes those variables inside the test closure:
-
node
corresponds to the annotated node, as usual -
compilationUnit
gives access to the currentorg.codehaus.groovy.control.CompilationUnit
-
compilePhase
returns the current compile phase (org.codehaus.groovy.control.CompilePhase
)
The latter is interesting if you don’t specify the phase
attribute. In that case, the closure will be executed after
each compile phase after (and including) SEMANTIC_ANALYSIS
. The context of the transformation is kept after each phase,
giving you a chance to check what changed between two phases.
As an example, here is how you could dump the list of AST transformations registered on a class node:
import groovy.transform.ASTTest
import groovy.transform.CompileStatic
import groovy.transform.Immutable
import org.codehaus.groovy.ast.ClassNode
import org.codehaus.groovy.control.CompilePhase
@ASTTest(value={
System.err.println "Compile phase: $compilePhase"
ClassNode cn = node
System.err.println "Global AST xforms: ${compilationUnit?.ASTTransformationsContext?.globalTransformNames}"
CompilePhase.values().each {
def transforms = cn.getTransforms(it)
if (transforms) {
System.err.println "Ast xforms for phase $it:"
transforms.each { map ->
System.err.println(map)
}
}
}
})
@CompileStatic
@Immutable
class Foo {
}
And here is how you can memorize variables for testing between two phases:
import groovy.transform.ASTTest
import groovy.transform.ToString
import org.codehaus.groovy.ast.ClassNode
import org.codehaus.groovy.control.CompilePhase
@ASTTest(value={
if (compilePhase == CompilePhase.INSTRUCTION_SELECTION) { (1)
println "toString() was added at phase: ${added}"
assert added == CompilePhase.CANONICALIZATION (2)
} else {
if (node.getDeclaredMethods('toString') && added == null) { (3)
added = compilePhase (4)
}
}
})
@ToString
class Foo {
String name
}
1 | if the current compile phase is instruction selection |
2 | then we want to make sure toString was added at CANONICALIZATION |
3 | otherwise, if toString exists and that the variable from the context, added is null |
4 | then it means that this compile phase is the one where toString was added |
Grape handling
@groovy.lang.Grapes
Grape
is a dependency management engine embedded into Groovy, relying on several annotations which are described
thoroughly in this section of the guide.
Developing AST transformations
There are two kinds of transformations: global and local transformations.
-
Global transformations are applied to by the compiler on the code being compiled, wherever the transformation apply. Compiled classes that implement global transformations are in a JAR added to the classpath of the compiler and contain service locator file
META-INF/services/org.codehaus.groovy.transform.ASTTransformation
with a line with the name of the transformation class. The transformation class must have a no-args constructor and implement theorg.codehaus.groovy.transform.ASTTransformation
interface. It will be run against every source in the compilation, so be sure to not create transformations which scan all the AST in an expansive and time-consuming manner, to keep the compiler fast. -
Local transformations are transformations applied locally by annotating code elements you want to transform. For this, we reuse the annotation notation, and those annotations should implement
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.ASTTransformation
. The compiler will discover them and apply the transformation on these code elements.
Compilation phases guide
Groovy AST transformations must be performed in one of the nine defined compilation phases (org.codehaus.groovy.control.CompilePhase).
Global transformations may be applied in any phase, but local transformations may only be applied in the semantic analysis phase or later. Briefly, the compiler phases are:
-
Initialization: source files are opened and environment configured
-
Parsing: the grammar is used to to produce tree of tokens representing the source code
-
Conversion: An abstract syntax tree (AST) is created from token trees.
-
Semantic Analysis: Performs consistency and validity checks that the grammar can’t check for, and resolves classes.
-
Canonicalization: Complete building the AST
-
Instruction Selection: instruction set is chosen, for example Java 6 or Java 7 bytecode level
-
Class Generation: creates the bytecode of the class in memory
-
Output: write the binary output to the file system
-
Finalization: Perform any last cleanup
Generally speaking, there is more type information available later in the phases. If your transformation is concerned with reading the AST, then a later phase where information is more plentiful might be a good choice. If your transformation is concerned with writing AST, then an earlier phase where the tree is more sparse might be more convenient.
Local transformations
Local AST transformations are relative to the context they are applied to. In most cases, the context is defined by an annotation that will define the scope of the transform. For example, annotating a field would mean that the transformation applies to the field, while annotating the class would mean that the transformation applies to the whole class.
As a naive and simple example, consider wanting to write a @WithLogging
transformation that would add console messages at the start and end of a
method invocation. So the following "Hello World" example would
actually print "Hello World" along with a start and stop message:
@WithLogging
def greet() {
println "Hello World"
}
greet()
A local AST transformation is an easy way to do this. It requires two things:
-
a definition of the
@WithLogging
annotation -
an implementation of org.codehaus.groovy.transform.ASTTransformation that adds the logging expressions to the method
An ASTTransformation
is a callback that gives you access to the
org.codehaus.groovy.control.SourceUnit,
through which you can get a reference to the
org.codehaus.groovy.ast.ModuleNode (AST).
The AST (Abstract Syntax Tree) is a tree structure consisting mostly of org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.Expression (expressions) or org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.Statement (statements). An easy way to learn about the AST is to explore it in a debugger. Once you have the AST, you can analyze it to find out information about the code or rewrite it to add new functionality.
The local transformation annotation is the simple part. Here is the
@WithLogging
one:
import org.codehaus.groovy.transform.GroovyASTTransformationClass
import java.lang.annotation.ElementType
import java.lang.annotation.Retention
import java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy
import java.lang.annotation.Target
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.SOURCE)
@Target([ElementType.METHOD])
@GroovyASTTransformationClass(["gep.WithLoggingASTTransformation"])
public @interface WithLogging {
}
The annotation retention can be SOURCE
because you won’t need the annotation
past that. The element type here is METHOD
, the @WithLogging
because the annotation
applies to methods.
But the most important part is the
@GroovyASTTransformationClass
annotation. This links the @WithLogging
annotation to the ASTTransformation
class you will write.
gep.WithLoggingASTTransformation
is the fully qualified class name of the
ASTTransformation
we are going to write. This line wires the annotation to the transformation.
With this in place, the Groovy compiler is going to invoke
gep.WithLoggingASTTransformation
every time an @WithLogging
is found in a
source unit. Any breakpoint set within LoggingASTTransformation
will now
be hit within the IDE when running the sample script.
The ASTTransformation
class is a little more complex. Here is the
very simple, and very naive, transformation to add a method start and
stop message for @WithLogging
:
@CompileStatic (1)
@GroovyASTTransformation(phase=CompilePhase.SEMANTIC_ANALYSIS) (2)
class WithLoggingASTTransformation implements ASTTransformation { (3)
@Override
void visit(ASTNode[] nodes, SourceUnit sourceUnit) { (4)
MethodNode method = (MethodNode) nodes[1] (5)
def startMessage = createPrintlnAst("Starting $method.name") (6)
def endMessage = createPrintlnAst("Ending $method.name") (7)
def existingStatements = ((BlockStatement)method.code).statements (8)
existingStatements.add(0, startMessage) (9)
existingStatements.add(endMessage) (10)
}
private static Statement createPrintlnAst(String message) { (11)
new ExpressionStatement(
new MethodCallExpression(
new VariableExpression("this"),
new ConstantExpression("println"),
new ArgumentListExpression(
new ConstantExpression(message)
)
)
)
}
}
1 | even if not mandatory, if you write an AST transformation in Groovy, it is highly recommended to use CompileStatic
because it will improve performance of the compiler. |
2 | annotate with org.codehaus.groovy.transform.GroovyASTTransformation to tell at which compilation phase the transform needs to run. Here, it’s at the semantic analysis phase. |
3 | implement the ASTTransformation interface |
4 | which only has a single visit method |
5 | the nodes parameter is a 2 AST node array, for which the first one is the annotation node (@WithLogging ) and
the second one is the annotated node (the method node) |
6 | create a statement that will print a message when we enter the method |
7 | create a statement that will print a message when we exit the method |
8 | get the method body, which in this case is a BlockStatement |
9 | add the enter method message before the first statement of existing code |
10 | append the exit method message after the last statement of existing code |
11 | creates an ExpressionStatement wrapping a MethodCallExpression corresponding to this.println("message") |
It is important to notice that for the brevity of this example, we didn’t make the necessary checks, such as checking
that the annotated node is really a MethodNode
, or that the method body is an instance of BlockStatement
. This
exercise is left to the reader.
Note the creation of the new println statements in the
createPrintlnAst(String)
method. Creating AST for code is not always
simple. In this case we need to construct a new method call, passing in
the receiver/variable, the name of the method, and an argument list.
When creating AST, it might be helpful to write the code you’re trying
to create in a Groovy file and then inspect the AST of that code in the
debugger to learn what to create. Then write a function like
createPrintlnAst
using what you learned through the debugger.
In the end:
@WithLogging
def greet() {
println "Hello World"
}
greet()
Produces:
Starting greet Hello World Ending greet
It is important to note that an AST transformation participates directly in the compilation process. A common error by beginners is to have the AST transformation code in the same source tree as a class that uses the transformation. Being in the same source tree in general means that they are compiled at the same time. Since the transformation itself is going to be compiled in phases and that each compile phase processes all files of the same source unit before going to the next one, there’s a direct consequence: the transformation will not be compiled before the class that uses it! In conclusion, AST transformations need to be precompiled before you can use them. In general, it is as easy as having them in a separate source tree. |
Global transformations
Global AST transformation are similar to local one with a major difference: they do not need an annotation, meaning that they are applied globally, that is to say on each class being compiled. It is therefore very important to limit their use to last resort, because it can have a significant impact on the compiler performance.
Following the example of the local AST transformation, imagine that we would like to trace all
methods, and not only those which are annotated with @WithLogging
. Basically, we need this code to behave the same
as the one annotated with @WithLogging
before:
def greet() {
println "Hello World"
}
greet()
To make this work, there are two steps:
-
create the
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.ASTTransformation
descriptor inside theMETA-INF/services
directory -
create the
ASTTransformation
implementation
The descriptor file is required and must be found on classpath. It will contain a single line:
gep.WithLoggingASTTransformation
The code for the transformation looks similar to the local case, but instead of using the ASTNode[]
parameter, we need
to use the SourceUnit
instead:
@CompileStatic (1)
@GroovyASTTransformation(phase=CompilePhase.SEMANTIC_ANALYSIS) (2)
class WithLoggingASTTransformation implements ASTTransformation { (3)
@Override
void visit(ASTNode[] nodes, SourceUnit sourceUnit) { (4)
def methods = sourceUnit.AST.methods (5)
methods.each { method -> (6)
def startMessage = createPrintlnAst("Starting $method.name") (7)
def endMessage = createPrintlnAst("Ending $method.name") (8)
def existingStatements = ((BlockStatement)method.code).statements (9)
existingStatements.add(0, startMessage) (10)
existingStatements.add(endMessage) (11)
}
}
private static Statement createPrintlnAst(String message) { (12)
new ExpressionStatement(
new MethodCallExpression(
new VariableExpression("this"),
new ConstantExpression("println"),
new ArgumentListExpression(
new ConstantExpression(message)
)
)
)
}
}
1 | even if not mandatory, if you write an AST transformation in Groovy, it is highly recommended to use CompileStatic
because it will improve performance of the compiler. |
2 | annotate with org.codehaus.groovy.transform.GroovyASTTransformation to tell at which compilation phase the transform needs to run. Here, it’s at the semantic analysis phase. |
3 | implement the ASTTransformation interface |
4 | which only has a single visit method |
5 | the sourceUnit parameter gives access to the source being compiled, so we get the AST of the current source
and retrieve the list of methods from this file |
6 | we iterate on each method from the source file |
7 | create a statement that will print a message when we enter the method |
8 | create a statement that will print a message when we exit the method |
9 | get the method body, which in this case is a BlockStatement |
10 | add the enter method message before the first statement of existing code |
11 | append the exit method message after the last statement of existing code |
12 | creates an ExpressionStatement wrapping a MethodCallExpression corresponding to this.println("message") |
AST API guide
While you have seen that you can directly implement the ASTTransformation
interface, in almost all cases you will not
do this but extend the org.codehaus.groovy.transform.AbstractASTTransformation class. This class provides several
utility methods that make AST transformations easier to write. Almost all AST transformations included in Groovy
extend this class.
It is a common use case to be able to transform an expression into another. Groovy provides a class which makes it very easy to do this: org.codehaus.groovy.ast.ClassCodeExpressionTransformer
To illustrate this, let’s create a @Shout
transformation that will transform all String
constants in method call
arguments into their uppercase version. For example:
@Shout
def greet() {
println "Hello World"
}
greet()
should print:
HELLO WORLD
Then the code for the transformation can use the ClassCodeExpressionTransformer
to make this easier:
@CompileStatic
@GroovyASTTransformation(phase=CompilePhase.SEMANTIC_ANALYSIS)
class ShoutASTTransformation implements ASTTransformation {
@Override
void visit(ASTNode[] nodes, SourceUnit sourceUnit) {
ClassCodeExpressionTransformer trn = new ClassCodeExpressionTransformer() { (1)
private boolean inArgList = false
@Override
protected SourceUnit getSourceUnit() {
sourceUnit (2)
}
@Override
Expression transform(final Expression exp) {
if (exp instanceof ArgumentListExpression) {
inArgList = true
} else if (inArgList &&
exp instanceof ConstantExpression && exp.value instanceof String) {
return new ConstantExpression(exp.value.toUpperCase()) (3)
}
def trn = super.transform(exp)
inArgList = false
trn
}
}
trn.visitMethod((MethodNode)nodes[1]) (4)
}
}
1 | Internally the transformation creates a ClassCodeExpressionTransformer |
2 | The transformer needs to return the source unit |
3 | if a constant expression of type string is detected inside an argument list, transform it into its upper case version |
4 | call the transformer on the method being annotated |
Writing an AST transformation requires a deep knowledge of the internal Groovy API. In particular it requires knowledge about the AST classes. Since those classes are internal, there are chances that the API will change in the future, meaning that your transformations could break. Despite that warning, the AST has been very stable over time and such a thing rarely happens. |
Classes of the Abstract Syntax Tree belong to the org.codehaus.groovy.ast
package. It is recommended to the reader
to use the Groovy Console, in particular the AST browser tool, to gain knowledge about those classes. However, a good
resource for learning is the AST Builder
test suite.
Macros
Until version 2.5.0, when developing AST transformations, developers should have a deep knowledge about how the AST (Abstract Syntax Tree) was built by the compiler in order to know how to add new expressions or statements during compile time.
Although the use of org.codehaus.groovy.ast.tool.GeneralUtils
static methods could mitigate the burden of creating
expressions and statements, it’s still a low-level way of writing those AST nodes directly.
We needed something to abstract us from writing the AST directly and that’s exactly what Groovy macros were made for.
They allow you to directly add code during compilation, without having to translate the code you had in mind to the
org.codehaus.groovy.ast.*
node related classes.
Let’s see an example, lets create a local AST transformation: @AddMessageMethod
. When applied to a given class it
will add a new method called getMessage
to that class. The method will return "42". The annotation is pretty
straight forward:
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.SOURCE)
@Target([ElementType.TYPE])
@GroovyASTTransformationClass(["metaprogramming.AddMethodASTTransformation"])
@interface AddMethod { }
What would the AST transformation look like without the use of a macro ? Something like this:
@GroovyASTTransformation(phase = CompilePhase.INSTRUCTION_SELECTION)
class AddMethodASTTransformation extends AbstractASTTransformation {
@Override
void visit(ASTNode[] nodes, SourceUnit source) {
ClassNode classNode = (ClassNode) nodes[1]
ReturnStatement code =
new ReturnStatement( (1)
new ConstantExpression("42")) (2)
MethodNode methodNode =
new MethodNode(
"getMessage",
ACC_PUBLIC,
ClassHelper.make(String),
[] as Parameter[],
[] as ClassNode[],
code) (3)
classNode.addMethod(methodNode) (4)
}
}
1 | Create a return statement |
2 | Create a constant expression "42" |
3 | Adding the code to the new method |
4 | Adding the new method to the annotated class |
If you’re not used to the AST API, that definitely doesn’t look like the code you had in mind. Now look how the previous code simplifies with the use of macros.
@GroovyASTTransformation(phase = CompilePhase.INSTRUCTION_SELECTION)
class AddMethodWithMacrosASTTransformation extends AbstractASTTransformation {
@Override
void visit(ASTNode[] nodes, SourceUnit source) {
ClassNode classNode = (ClassNode) nodes[1]
ReturnStatement simplestCode = macro { return "42" } (1)
MethodNode methodNode =
new MethodNode(
"getMessage",
ACC_PUBLIC,
ClassHelper.make(String),
[] as Parameter[],
[] as ClassNode[],
simplestCode) (2)
classNode.addMethod(methodNode) (3)
}
}
1 | Much simpler. You wanted to add a return statement that returned "42" and that’s exactly what you can read inside
the macro utility method. Your plain code will be translated for you to a org.codehaus.groovy.ast.stmt.ReturnStatement |
2 | Adding the return statement to the new method |
3 | Adding the new code to the annotated class |
Although the macro
method is used in this example to create a statement the macro
method could also be used to create
expressions as well, it depends on which macro
signature you use:
-
macro(Closure)
: Create a given statement with the code inside the closure. -
macro(Boolean,Closure)
: if true wrap expressions inside the closure inside an statement, if false then return an expression -
macro(CompilePhase, Closure)
: Create a given statement with the code inside the closure in a specific compile phase -
macro(CompilePhase, Boolean, Closure)
: Create an statement or an expression (true == statement, false == expression) in a specific compilation phase.
All these signatures can be found at org.codehaus.groovy.macro.runtime.MacroGroovyMethods
|
Sometimes we could be only interested in creating a given expression, not the whole statement, in order to do that we
should use any of the macro
invocations with a boolean parameter:
@GroovyASTTransformation(phase = CompilePhase.INSTRUCTION_SELECTION)
class AddGetTwoASTTransformation extends AbstractASTTransformation {
BinaryExpression onePlusOne() {
return macro(false) { 1 + 1 } (1)
}
@Override
void visit(ASTNode[] nodes, SourceUnit source) {
ClassNode classNode = nodes[1]
BinaryExpression expression = onePlusOne() (2)
ReturnStatement returnStatement = GeneralUtils.returnS(expression) (3)
MethodNode methodNode =
new MethodNode("getTwo",
ACC_PUBLIC,
ClassHelper.Integer_TYPE,
[] as Parameter[],
[] as ClassNode[],
returnStatement (4)
)
classNode.addMethod(methodNode) (5)
}
}
1 | We’re telling macro not to wrap the expression in a statement, we’re only interested in the expression |
2 | Assigning the expression |
3 | Creating a ReturnStatement using a method from GeneralUtils and returning the expression |
4 | Adding the code to the new method |
5 | Adding the method to the class |
Macros are great but we can’t create anything useful or reusable if our macros couldn’t receive parameters or resolve surrounding variables.
In the following example we’re creating an AST transformation @MD5
that when applied to a given String field will
add a method returning the MD5 value of that field.
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.SOURCE)
@Target([ElementType.FIELD])
@GroovyASTTransformationClass(["metaprogramming.MD5ASTTransformation"])
@interface MD5 { }
And the transformation:
@GroovyASTTransformation(phase = CompilePhase.CANONICALIZATION)
class MD5ASTTransformation extends AbstractASTTransformation {
@Override
void visit(ASTNode[] nodes, SourceUnit source) {
FieldNode fieldNode = nodes[1]
ClassNode classNode = fieldNode.declaringClass
String capitalizedName = fieldNode.name.capitalize()
MethodNode methodNode = new MethodNode(
"get${capitalizedName}MD5",
ACC_PUBLIC,
ClassHelper.STRING_TYPE,
[] as Parameter[],
[] as ClassNode[],
buildMD5MethodCode(fieldNode))
classNode.addMethod(methodNode)
}
BlockStatement buildMD5MethodCode(FieldNode fieldNode) {
VariableExpression fieldVar = GeneralUtils.varX(fieldNode.name) (1)
return macro(CompilePhase.SEMANTIC_ANALYSIS, true) { (2)
return java.security.MessageDigest
.getInstance('MD5')
.digest($v { fieldVar }.getBytes()) (3)
.encodeHex()
.toString()
}
}
}
1 | We need a reference to a variable expression |
2 | If using a class outside the standard packages we should add any needed imports or use the qualified name. When using the qualified named of a given static method you need to make sure it’s resolved in the proper compile phase. In this particular case we’re instructing the macro to resolve it at the SEMANTIC_ANALYSIS phase, which is the first compile phase with type information. |
3 | In order to substitute any expression inside the macro we need to use the $v method. $v receives a closure as an
argument, and the closure is only allowed to substitute expressions, meaning classes inheriting
org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.Expression . |
As we mentioned earlier, the macro
method is only capable of producing statements
and expressions
. But what if we
want to produce other types of nodes, such as a method, a field and so on?
org.codehaus.groovy.macro.transform.MacroClass
can be used to create classes (ClassNode instances) in our
transformations the same way we created statements and expressions with the macro
method before.
The next example is a local transformation @Statistics
. When applied to a given class, it will add two methods
getMethodCount() and getFieldCount() which return how many methods and fields within the class respectively. Here
is the marker annotation.
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.SOURCE)
@Target([ElementType.TYPE])
@GroovyASTTransformationClass(["metaprogramming.StatisticsASTTransformation"])
@interface Statistics {}
And the AST transformation:
@CompileStatic
@GroovyASTTransformation(phase = CompilePhase.INSTRUCTION_SELECTION)
class StatisticsASTTransformation extends AbstractASTTransformation {
@Override
void visit(ASTNode[] nodes, SourceUnit source) {
ClassNode classNode = (ClassNode) nodes[1]
ClassNode templateClass = buildTemplateClass(classNode) (1)
templateClass.methods.each { MethodNode node -> (2)
classNode.addMethod(node)
}
}
@CompileDynamic
ClassNode buildTemplateClass(ClassNode reference) { (3)
def methodCount = constX(reference.methods.size()) (4)
def fieldCount = constX(reference.fields.size()) (5)
return new MacroClass() {
class Statistics {
java.lang.Integer getMethodCount() { (6)
return $v { methodCount }
}
java.lang.Integer getFieldCount() { (7)
return $v { fieldCount }
}
}
}
}
}
1 | Creating a template class |
2 | Adding template class methods to the annotated class |
3 | Passing the reference class |
4 | Extracting reference class method count value expression |
5 | Extracting reference class field count value expression |
6 | Building the getMethodCount() method using reference’s method count value expression |
7 | Building the getFieldCount() method using reference’s field count value expression |
Basically we’ve created the Statistics class as a template to avoid writing low level AST API, then we copied methods created in the template class to their final destination.
Types inside the MacroClass implementation should be resolved inside, that’s why we had to write
java.lang.Integer instead of simply writing Integer .
|
Notice that we’re using @CompileDynamic . That’s because the way we use MacroClass is like we
were actually implementing it. So if you were using @CompileStatic it will complain because an implementation of
an abstract class can’t be another different class.
|
You have seen that by using macro
you can save yourself a lot of work but you might wonder where
that method came from. You didn’t declare it or static import it. You can think of it as a special
global method (or if you prefer, a method on every Object
). This is much like how the println
extension method is defined. But unlike println
which becomes a method selected for execution
later in the compilation process, macro
expansion is done early in the compilation process.
The declaration of macro
as one of the available methods for this early expansion is done
by annotating a macro
method definition with the @Macro
annotation and making that method
available using a similar mechanism for extension modules. Such methods are known as macro methods
and the good news is you can define your own.
To define your own macro method, create a class in a similar way to an extension module and add a method such as:
public class ExampleMacroMethods {
@Macro
public static Expression safe(MacroContext macroContext, MethodCallExpression callExpression) {
return ternaryX(
notNullX(callExpression.getObjectExpression()),
callExpression,
constX(null)
);
}
...
}
Now you would register this as an extension module using a org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.ExtensionModule
file within the META-INF/groovy
directory.
Now, assuming that the class and meta info file are on your classpath, you can use the macro method in the following way:
def nullObject = null
assert null == safe(safe(nullObject.hashcode()).toString())
Testing AST transformations
This section is about good practices with regards to testing AST transformations. Previous sections highlighted the fact that to be able to execute an AST transformation, it has to be precompiled. It might sound obvious but a lot of people get caught on this, trying to use an AST transformation in the same source tree as where it is defined.
The first tip for testing AST transformation is therefore to separate test sources from the sources of the transform. Again, this is nothing but best practices, but you must make sure that your build too does actually compile them separately. This is the case by default with both Apache Maven and Gradle.
It is very handy to be able to put a breakpoint in an AST transformation, so that you can debug your code in the IDE. However, you might be surprised to see that your IDE doesn’t stop on the breakpoint. The reason is actually simple: if your IDE uses the Groovy compiler to compile the unit tests for your AST transformation, then the compilation is triggered from the IDE, but the process which will compile the files doesn’t have debugging options. It’s only when the test case is executed that the debugging options are set on the virtual machine. In short: it is too late, the class has been compiled already, and your transformation is already applied.
A very easy workaround is to use the GroovyTestCase
class which provides an assertScript
method. This means that
instead of writing this in a test case:
static class Subject {
@MyTransformToDebug
void methodToBeTested() {}
}
void testMyTransform() {
def c = new Subject()
c.methodToBeTested()
}
You should write:
void testMyTransformWithBreakpoint() {
assertScript '''
import metaprogramming.MyTransformToDebug
class Subject {
@MyTransformToDebug
void methodToBeTested() {}
}
def c = new Subject()
c.methodToBeTested()
'''
}
The difference is that when you use assertScript
, the code in the assertScript
block is compiled when the
unit test is executed. That is to say that this time, the Subject
class will be compiled with debugging active, and
the breakpoint is going to be hit.
Sometimes you may want to make assertions over AST nodes; perhaps to filter the nodes, or to make sure a given transformation has built the expected AST node.
Filtering nodes
For instance if you would like to apply a given transformation only to a specific set of AST nodes, you could
use ASTMatcher to filter these nodes. The following example shows how to transform a given expression to
another. Using ASTMatcher it looks for a specific expression 1 + 1
and it transforms it to 3
. That’s why
we called it the @Joking
example.
First we create the @Joking
annotation that only can be applied to methods:
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.SOURCE)
@Target([ElementType.METHOD])
@GroovyASTTransformationClass(["metaprogramming.JokingASTTransformation"])
@interface Joking { }
Then the transformation, that only applies an instance of org.codehaus.groovy.ast.ClassCodeExpressionTransformer
to all the expressions within the method code block.
@CompileStatic
@GroovyASTTransformation(phase = CompilePhase.INSTRUCTION_SELECTION)
class JokingASTTransformation extends AbstractASTTransformation {
@Override
void visit(ASTNode[] nodes, SourceUnit source) {
MethodNode methodNode = (MethodNode) nodes[1]
methodNode
.getCode()
.visit(new ConvertOnePlusOneToThree(source)) (1)
}
}
1 | Get the method’s code statement and apply the expression transformer |
And this is when the ASTMatcher is used to apply the transformation only to those expressions matching
the expression 1 + 1
.
class ConvertOnePlusOneToThree extends ClassCodeExpressionTransformer {
SourceUnit sourceUnit
ConvertOnePlusOneToThree(SourceUnit sourceUnit) {
this.sourceUnit = sourceUnit
}
@Override
Expression transform(Expression exp) {
Expression ref = macro { 1 + 1 } (1)
if (ASTMatcher.matches(ref, exp)) { (2)
return macro { 3 } (3)
}
return super.transform(exp)
}
}
1 | Builds the expression used as reference pattern |
2 | Checks the current expression evaluated matches the reference expression |
3 | If it matches then replaces the current expression with the expression built with macro |
Then you could test the implementation as follows:
package metaprogramming
class Something {
@Joking
Integer getResult() {
return 1 + 1
}
}
assert new Something().result == 3
Unit testing AST transforms
Normally we test AST transformations just checking that the final use of the transformation does what we expect. But it would be great if we could have an easy way to check, for example, that the nodes the transformation adds are what we expected from the beginning.
The following transformation adds a new method giveMeTwo
to an annotated class.
@GroovyASTTransformation(phase = CompilePhase.INSTRUCTION_SELECTION)
class TwiceASTTransformation extends AbstractASTTransformation {
static final String VAR_X = 'x'
@Override
void visit(ASTNode[] nodes, SourceUnit source) {
ClassNode classNode = (ClassNode) nodes[1]
MethodNode giveMeTwo = getTemplateClass(sumExpression)
.getDeclaredMethods('giveMeTwo')
.first()
classNode.addMethod(giveMeTwo) (1)
}
BinaryExpression getSumExpression() { (2)
return macro {
$v{ varX(VAR_X) } +
$v{ varX(VAR_X) }
}
}
ClassNode getTemplateClass(Expression expression) { (3)
return new MacroClass() {
class Template {
java.lang.Integer giveMeTwo(java.lang.Integer x) {
return $v { expression }
}
}
}
}
}
1 | Adding the method to the annotated class |
2 | Building a binary expression. The binary expression uses the same variable expression in both
sides of the + token (check varX method at org.codehaus.groovy.ast.tool.GeneralUtils). |
3 | Builds a new ClassNode with a method called giveMeTwo which returns the result of an expression
passed as parameter. |
Now instead of creating a test executing the transformation over a given sample code. I would like to check that the construction of the binary expression is done properly:
void testTestingSumExpression() {
use(ASTMatcher) { (1)
TwiceASTTransformation sample = new TwiceASTTransformation()
Expression referenceNode = macro {
a + a (2)
}.withConstraints { (3)
placeholder 'a' (4)
}
assert sample
.sumExpression
.matches(referenceNode) (5)
}
}
1 | Using ASTMatcher as a category |
2 | Build a template node |
3 | Apply some constraints to that template node |
4 | Tells compiler that a is a placeholder. |
5 | Asserts reference node and current node are equal |
Of course you can/should always check the actual execution:
void testASTBehavior() {
assertScript '''
package metaprogramming
@Twice
class AAA {
}
assert new AAA().giveMeTwo(1) == 2
'''
}
Last but not least, testing an AST transformation is also about testing the state of the AST during compilation. Groovy
provides a tool named @ASTTest
for this: it is an annotation that will let you add assertions on an abstract syntax
tree. Please check the documentation for ASTTest for more details.
External references
If you are interested in a step-by-step tutorial about writing AST transformations, you can follow this workshop.
3.5. Dependency management with Grape
3.5.1. Quick start
Add a Dependency
Grape is a JAR dependency manager embedded into Groovy. Grape lets you quickly add maven repository dependencies to your classpath, making scripting even easier. The simplest use is as simple as adding an annotation to your script:
@Grab(group='org.springframework', module='spring-orm', version='3.2.5.RELEASE')
import org.springframework.jdbc.core.JdbcTemplate
@Grab
also supports a shorthand notation:
@Grab('org.springframework:spring-orm:3.2.5.RELEASE')
import org.springframework.jdbc.core.JdbcTemplate
Note that we are using an annotated import here, which is the recommended way. You can also search for
dependencies on mvnrepository.com and it will
provide you the @Grab
annotation form of the pom.xml
entry.
Specify Additional Repositories
Not all dependencies are in maven central. You can add new ones like this:
@GrabResolver(name='restlet', root='http://maven.restlet.org/')
@Grab(group='org.restlet', module='org.restlet', version='1.1.6')
Maven Classifiers
Some maven dependencies need classifiers in order to be able to resolve. You can fix that like this:
@Grab(group='net.sf.json-lib', module='json-lib', version='2.2.3', classifier='jdk15')
Excluding Transitive Dependencies
Sometimes you will want to exclude transitive dependencies as you might be already using a slightly different but compatible version of some artifact. You can do this as follows:
@Grab('net.sourceforge.htmlunit:htmlunit:2.8')
@GrabExclude('xml-apis:xml-apis')
JDBC Drivers
Because of the way JDBC drivers are loaded, you’ll need to configure Grape to attach JDBC driver dependencies to the system class loader. I.e:
@GrabConfig(systemClassLoader=true)
@Grab(group='mysql', module='mysql-connector-java', version='5.1.6')
Using Grape From the Groovy Shell
From groovysh use the method call variant:
groovy.grape.Grape.grab(group:'org.springframework', module:'spring', version:'2.5.6')
Proxy settings
If you are behind a firewall and/or need to use Groovy/Grape through a
proxy server, you can specify those settings on the command like via the
http.proxyHost
and http.proxyPort
system properties:
groovy -Dhttp.proxyHost=yourproxy -Dhttp.proxyPort=8080 yourscript.groovy
Or you can make this system wide by adding these properties to your JAVA_OPTS environment variable:
JAVA_OPTS = -Dhttp.proxyHost=yourproxy -Dhttp.proxyPort=8080
Logging
If you want to see what Grape is doing set the system property
groovy.grape.report.downloads
to true
(e.g. add
-Dgroovy.grape.report.downloads=true
to invocation or JAVA_OPTS) and Grape will
print the following infos to System.error:
-
Starting resolve of a dependency
-
Starting download of an artifact
-
Retrying download of an artifact
-
Download size and time for downloaded artifacts
To log with even more verbosity, increase the Ivy log level
(defaults to -1
). For example -Divy.message.logger.level=4
.
3.5.2. Detail
Grape (The Groovy Adaptable Packaging Engine or Groovy Advanced Packaging Engine) is the infrastructure enabling the grab() calls in Groovy, a set of classes leveraging Ivy to allow for a repository driven module system for Groovy. This allows a developer to write a script with an essentially arbitrary library requirement, and ship just the script. Grape will, at runtime, download as needed and link the named libraries and all dependencies forming a transitive closure when the script is run from existing repositories such as JCenter, Ibiblio and java.net.
Grape follows the Ivy conventions for module version identification, with naming change.
-
group
- Which module group the module comes from. Translates directly to a Maven groupId or an Ivy Organization. Any group matching/groovy[x][\..*]^/
is reserved and may have special meaning to the groovy endorsed modules. -
module
- The name of the module to load. Translated directly to a Maven artifactId or an Ivy artifact. -
version
- The version of the module to use. Either a literal version `1.1-RC3' or an Ivy Range `[2.2.1,)' meaning 2.2.1 or any greater version). -
classifier
- The optional classifier to use (for example, jdk15)
The downloaded modules will be stored according to Ivy’s standard
mechanism with a cache root of ~/.groovy/grapes
3.5.3. Usage
Annotation
One or more groovy.lang.Grab
annotations can be added at any place that
annotations are accepted to tell the compiler that this code relies on
the specific library. This will have the effect of adding the library to
the classloader of the groovy compiler. This annotation is detected and
evaluated before any other resolution of classes in the script, so
imported classes can be properly resolved by a @Grab
annotation.
import com.jidesoft.swing.JideSplitButton
@Grab(group='com.jidesoft', module='jide-oss', version='[2.2.1,2.3.0)')
public class TestClassAnnotation {
public static String testMethod () {
return JideSplitButton.class.name
}
}
An appropriate grab(…)
call will be added to the static initializer
of the class of the containing class (or script class in the case of an
annotated script element).
Multiple Grape Annotations
In early versions of Groovy, if you wanted to use a Grab annotation multiple times
on the same node you had to use the @Grapes
annotation, e.g.:
@Grapes([
@Grab(group='commons-primitives', module='commons-primitives', version='1.0'),
@Grab(group='org.ccil.cowan.tagsoup', module='tagsoup', version='0.9.7')])
class Example {
// ...
}
Otherwise you’d encounter the following error:
Cannot specify duplicate annotation on the same member
But in recent versions, @Grapes is purely optional.
Technical notes:
-
Originally, Groovy stored the Grab annotations for access at runtime and duplicates aren’t allowed in the bytecode. In current versions, @Grab has only SOURCE retention, so the multiple occurrences aren’t an issue.
-
Future versions of Grape may support using the Grapes annotation to provide a level of structuring, e.g. allowing a GrabExclude or GrabResolver annotation to apply to only a subset of the Grab annotations.
Method call
Typically a call to grab will occur early in the script or in class initialization. This is to insure that the libraries are made available to the ClassLoader before the groovy code relies on the code. A couple of typical calls may appear as follows:
import groovy.grape.Grape
// random maven library
Grape.grab(group:'com.jidesoft', module:'jide-oss', version:'[2.2.0,)')
Grape.grab([group:'org.apache.ivy', module:'ivy', version:'2.0.0-beta1', conf:['default', 'optional']],
[group:'org.apache.ant', module:'ant', version:'1.7.0'])
-
Multiple calls to grab in the same context with the same parameters should be idempotent. However, if the same code is called with a different
ClassLoader
context then resolution may be re-run. -
If the
args
map passed into thegrab
call has an attributenoExceptions
that evaluates true no exceptions will be thrown. -
grab
requires that aRootLoader
orGroovyClassLoader
be specified or be in theClassLoader
chain of the calling class. By default failure to have such aClassLoader
available will result in module resolution and an exception being thrown-
The ClassLoader passed in via the
classLoader:
argument and its parent classloaders. -
The ClassLoader of the object passed in as the
referenceObject:
argument, and its parent classloaders. -
The ClassLoader of the class issuing the call to
grab
-
grab(HashMap) Parameters
-
group:
- <String> - Which module group the module comes from. Translates directly to a Maven groupId. Any group matching/groovy(|\..|x|x\..)/
is reserved and may have special meaning to the groovy endorsed modules. -
module:
- <String> - The name of the module to load. Translated directly to a Maven artifactId. -
version:
- <String> and possibly <Range> - The version of the module to use. Either a literal version `1.1-RC3' or an Ivy Range `[2.2.1,)' meaning 2.2.1 or any greater version). -
classifier:
- <String> - The Maven classifier to resolve by. -
conf:
- <String>, defaultdefault' - The configuration or scope of the module to download. The default conf is `default:
which maps to the mavenruntime
andmaster
scopes. -
force:
- <boolean>, defaults true - Used to indicate that this revision must be used in case of conflicts, independently of -
conflicts manager
-
changing:
- <boolean>, default false - Whether the artifact can change without its version designation changing. -
transitive:
- <boolean>, default true - Whether to resolve other dependencies this module has or not.
There are two principal variants of grab
, one with a single Map and
one with an arguments Map and multiple dependencies map. A call to the
single map grab is the same as calling grab with the same map passed in
twice, so grab arguments and dependencies can be mixed in the same map,
and grab can be called as a single method with named parameters.
There are synonyms for these parameters. Submitting more than one is a runtime exception.
-
group:
,groupId:
,organisation:
,organization:
,org:
-
module:
,artifactId:
,artifact:
-
version:
,revision:
,rev:
-
conf:
,scope:
,configuration:
Arguments Map arguments
-
classLoader:
- <GroovyClassLaoder> or <RootClassLoader> - The ClassLoader to add resolved Jars to -
refObject:
- <Object> - The closest parent ClassLoader for the object’s class will be treated as though it were passed in asclassLoader:
-
validate:
- <boolean>, default false - Should poms or ivy files be validated (true), or should we trust the cache (false). -
noExceptions:
- <boolean>, default false - If ClassLoader resolution or repository querying fails, should we throw an exception (false) or fail silently (true).
Command Line Tool
Grape added a command line executable `grape' that allows for the inspection and management of the local grape cache.
grape install [-hv] <group> <module> [<version>] [<classifier>]
This installs the specified groovy module or maven artifact. If a version is specified that specific version will be installed, otherwise the most recent version will be used (as if `*' we passed in).
grape list
Lists locally installed modules (with their full maven name in the case of groovy modules) and versions.
grape resolve [-adhisv] (<groupId> <artifactId> <version>)+
This returns the file locations of the jars representing the artifacts for the specified module(s) and the respective transitive dependencies. You may optionally pass in -ant, -dos, or -shell to get the dependencies expressed in a format applicable for an ant script, windows batch file, or unix shell script respectively. -ivy may be passed to see the dependencies expressed in an ivy like format.
grape uninstall [-hv] <group> <module> <version>
This uninstalls a particular grape: it non-transitively removes the respective jar file from the grape cache.
Advanced configuration
Repository Directory
If you need to change the directory grape uses for downloading libraries you can specify the grape.root system property to change the default (which is ~/.groovy/grapes)
groovy -Dgrape.root=/repo/grapes yourscript.groovy
Customize Ivy settings
You can customize the ivy settings that Grape uses by creating a ~/.groovy/grapeConfig.xml file. If no such file exists, here are the default settings used by Grape.
For more information on how to customize these settings, please refer to the Ivy documentation.
More Examples
Using Apache Commons Collections:
// create and use a primitive array list
@Grab(group='commons-primitives', module='commons-primitives', version='1.0')
import org.apache.commons.collections.primitives.ArrayIntList
def createEmptyInts() { new ArrayIntList() }
def ints = createEmptyInts()
ints.add(0, 42)
assert ints.size() == 1
assert ints.get(0) == 42
Using TagSoup:
// find the PDF links of the Java specifications
@Grab(group='org.ccil.cowan.tagsoup', module='tagsoup', version='1.2.1')
def getHtml() {
def parser = new XmlParser(new org.ccil.cowan.tagsoup.Parser())
parser.parse("https://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/")
}
html.body.'**'.a.@href.grep(~/.*\.pdf/).each{ println it }
Using Google Collections:
import com.google.common.collect.HashBiMap
@Grab(group='com.google.code.google-collections', module='google-collect', version='snapshot-20080530')
def getFruit() { [grape:'purple', lemon:'yellow', orange:'orange'] as HashBiMap }
assert fruit.lemon == 'yellow'
assert fruit.inverse().yellow == 'lemon'
Launching a Jetty server to serve Groovy templates:
@Grab('org.eclipse.jetty.aggregate:jetty-server:8.1.19.v20160209')
@Grab('org.eclipse.jetty.aggregate:jetty-servlet:8.1.19.v20160209')
@Grab('javax.servlet:javax.servlet-api:3.0.1')
import org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server
import org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletContextHandler
import groovy.servlet.TemplateServlet
def runServer(duration) {
def server = new Server(8080)
def context = new ServletContextHandler(server, "/", ServletContextHandler.SESSIONS)
context.resourceBase = "."
context.addServlet(TemplateServlet, "*.gsp")
server.start()
sleep duration
server.stop()
}
runServer(10000)
Grape will download Jetty and its dependencies on first launch of this script, and cache them. We create a new Jetty Server on port 8080, then expose Groovy’s TemplateServlet at the root of the context — Groovy comes with its own powerful template engine mechanism. We start the server and let it run for a certain duration. Each time someone will hit http://localhost:8080/somepage.gsp, it will display the somepage.gsp template to the user — those template pages should be situated in the same directory as this server script.
3.6. Testing Guide
3.6.1. Introduction
The Groovy programming language comes with great support for writing tests. In addition to the language features and test integration with state-of-the-art testing libraries and frameworks, the Groovy ecosystem has born a rich set of testing libraries and frameworks.
This chapter will start with language specific testing features and continue with a closer look at JUnit integration, Spock for specifications, and Geb for functional tests. Finally, we’ll do an overview of other testing libraries known to be working with Groovy.
3.6.2. Language Features
Besides integrated support for JUnit, the Groovy programming language comes with features that have proven to be very valuable for test-driven development. This section gives insight on them.
Power Assertions
Writing tests means formulating assumptions by using assertions. In Java this can be done by using the assert
keyword that has been added in J2SE 1.4. In Java, assert
statements can be enabled via the JVM parameters -ea
(or -enableassertions
) and -da
(or -disableassertions
). Assertion statements in Java are disabled by default.
Groovy comes with a rather powerful variant of assert
also known as power assertion statement. Groovy’s power
assert
differs from the Java version in its output given the boolean expression validates to false
:
def x = 1
assert x == 2
// Output: (1)
//
// Assertion failed:
// assert x == 2
// | |
// 1 false
1 | This section shows the std-err output |
The java.lang.AssertionError
that is thrown whenever the assertion can not be validated successfully, contains
an extended version of the original exception message. The power assertion output shows evaluation results from
the outer to the inner expression.
The power assertion statements true power unleashes in complex Boolean statements, or statements with
collections or other toString
-enabled classes:
def x = [1,2,3,4,5]
assert (x << 6) == [6,7,8,9,10]
// Output:
//
// Assertion failed:
// assert (x << 6) == [6,7,8,9,10]
// | | |
// | | false
// | [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
// [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
Another important difference from Java is that in Groovy assertions are enabled by default. It has been a language design
decision to remove the possibility to deactivate assertions. Or, as Bertrand Meyer stated, it makes no sense to take
off your swim ring if you put your feet into real water
.
One thing to be aware of are methods with side-effects inside Boolean expressions in power assertion statements. As the internal error message construction mechanism does only store references to instances under target, it happens that the error message text is invalid at rendering time in case of side-effecting methods involved:
assert [[1,2,3,3,3,3,4]].first().unique() == [1,2,3]
// Output:
//
// Assertion failed:
// assert [[1,2,3,3,3,3,4]].first().unique() == [1,2,3]
// | | |
// | | false
// | [1, 2, 3, 4]
// [1, 2, 3, 4] (1)
1 | The error message shows the actual state of the collection, not the state before the unique method was applied |
If you choose to provide a custom assertion error message this can be done by using the Java syntax assert
expression1 : expression2 where expression1 is the Boolean expression and expression2 is the custom error message.
Be aware though that this will disable the power assert and will fully fallback to custom
error messages on assertion errors.
|
Mocking and Stubbing
Groovy has excellent built-in support for a range of mocking and stubbing alternatives. When using Java, dynamic mocking frameworks are very popular. A key reason for this is that it is hard work creating custom hand-crafted mocks using Java. Such frameworks can be used easily with Groovy if you choose but creating custom mocks is much easier in Groovy. You can often get away with simple maps or closures to build your custom mocks.
The following sections show ways to create mocks and stubs with Groovy language features only.
Map Coercion
By using maps or expandos, we can incorporate desired behaviour of a collaborator very easily as shown here:
class TranslationService {
String convert(String key) {
return "test"
}
}
def service = [convert: { String key -> 'some text' }] as TranslationService
assert 'some text' == service.convert('key.text')
The as
operator can be used to coerce a map to a particular class. The given map keys are interpreted as
method names and the values, being groovy.lang.Closure
blocks, are interpreted as method code blocks.
Be aware that map coercion can get into the way if you deal with custom java.util.Map descendant classes in combination
with the as operator. The map coercion mechanism is targeted directly at certain collection classes, it doesn’t take
custom classes into account.
|
Closure Coercion
The 'as' operator can be used with closures in a neat way which is great for developer testing in simple scenarios. We haven’t found this technique to be so powerful that we want to do away with dynamic mocking, but it can be very useful in simple cases none-the-less.
Classes or interfaces holding a single method, including SAM (single abstract method) classes, can be used to coerce a closure block to be an object of the given type. Be aware that for doing this, Groovy internally create a proxy object descending for the given class. So the object will not be a direct instance of the given class. This important if, for example, the generated proxy object’s meta-class is altered afterwards.
Let’s have an example on coercing a closure to be of a specific type:
def service = { String key -> 'some text' } as TranslationService
assert 'some text' == service.convert('key.text')
Groovy supports a feature called implicit SAM coercion. This means that the as
operator is not necessary in situations
where the runtime can infer the target SAM type. This type of coercion might be useful in tests to mock entire SAM
classes:
abstract class BaseService {
abstract void doSomething()
}
BaseService service = { -> println 'doing something' }
service.doSomething()
MockFor and StubFor
The Groovy mocking and stubbing classes can be found in the groovy.mock.interceptor
package.
The MockFor
class supports (typically unit) testing of classes in isolation by allowing a strictly ordered expectation
of the behavior of collaborators to be defined. A typical test scenario involves a class under test and one or more collaborators. In such a scenario it is
often desirable to just test the business logic of the class under test. One strategy for doing that is to replace
the collaborator instances with simplified mock objects to help isolate out the logic in the test target. MockFor
allows such mocks to be created using meta-programming. The desired behavior of collaborators is defined as a behavior
specification. The behavior is enforced and checked automatically.
Let’s assume our target classes looked like this:
class Person {
String first, last
}
class Family {
Person father, mother
def nameOfMother() { "$mother.first $mother.last" }
}
With MockFor
, a mock expectation is always sequence dependent and its use automatically ends with a call to verify
:
def mock = new MockFor(Person) (1)
mock.demand.getFirst{ 'dummy' }
mock.demand.getLast{ 'name' }
mock.use { (2)
def mary = new Person(first:'Mary', last:'Smith')
def f = new Family(mother:mary)
assert f.nameOfMother() == 'dummy name'
}
mock.expect.verify() (3)
1 | a new mock is created by a new instance of MockFor |
2 | a Closure is passed to use which enables the mocking functionality |
3 | a call to verify checks whether the sequence and number of method calls is as expected |
The StubFor
class supports (typically unit) testing of classes in isolation by allowing a loosely-ordered expectation
of the behavior of collaborators to be defined. A typical test scenario involves a class under test and one or more
collaborators. In such a scenario it is often desirable to just test the business logic of the CUT. One strategy for
doing that is to replace the collaborator instances with simplified stub objects to help isolate out the logic
in the target class. StubFor
allows such stubs to be created using meta-programming. The desired behavior of
collaborators is defined as a behavior specification.
In contrast to MockFor
the stub expectation checked with verify
is sequence independent and its use is optional:
def stub = new StubFor(Person) (1)
stub.demand.with { (2)
getLast{ 'name' }
getFirst{ 'dummy' }
}
stub.use { (3)
def john = new Person(first:'John', last:'Smith')
def f = new Family(father:john)
assert f.father.first == 'dummy'
assert f.father.last == 'name'
}
stub.expect.verify() (4)
1 | a new stub is created by a new instance of StubFor |
2 | the with method is used for delegating all calls inside the closure to the StubFor instance |
3 | a Closure is passed to use which enables the stubbing functionality |
4 | a call to verify (optional) checks whether the number of method calls is as expected |
MockFor
and StubFor
can not be used to test statically compiled classes e.g for Java classes or Groovy classes that
make use of @CompileStatic
. To stub and/or mock these classes you can use Spock or one of the Java mocking libraries.
Expando Meta-Class (EMC)
Groovy includes a special MetaClass
the so-called ExpandoMetaClass
(EMC). It allows to dynamically add methods,
constructors, properties and static methods using a neat closure syntax.
Every java.lang.Class
is supplied with a special metaClass
property that will give a reference to an
ExpandoMetaClass
instance. The expando meta-class is not restricted to custom classes, it can be used for
JDK classes like for example java.lang.String
as well:
String.metaClass.swapCase = {->
def sb = new StringBuffer()
delegate.each {
sb << (Character.isUpperCase(it as char) ? Character.toLowerCase(it as char) :
Character.toUpperCase(it as char))
}
sb.toString()
}
def s = "heLLo, worLD!"
assert s.swapCase() == 'HEllO, WORld!'
The ExpandoMetaClass
is a rather good candidate for mocking functionality as it allows for more advanced stuff
like mocking static methods
class Book {
String title
}
Book.metaClass.static.create << { String title -> new Book(title:title) }
def b = Book.create("The Stand")
assert b.title == 'The Stand'
or even constructors
Book.metaClass.constructor << { String title -> new Book(title:title) }
def b = new Book("The Stand")
assert b.title == 'The Stand'
Mocking constructors might seem like a hack that’s better not even to be considered but even there might be valid
use cases. An example can be found in Grails where domain class constructors are added at run-time with the
help of ExpandoMetaClass . This lets the domain object register itself in the Spring application context and allows
for injection of services or other beans controlled by the dependency-injection container.
|
If you want to change the metaClass
property on a per test method level you need to remove the changes that were
done to the meta-class, otherwise those changes would be persistent across test method calls. Changes are removed by
replacing the meta-class in the GroovyMetaClassRegistry
:
GroovySystem.metaClassRegistry.setMetaClass(java.lang.String, null)
Another alternative is to register a MetaClassRegistryChangeEventListener
, track the changed classes and remove
the changes in the cleanup method of your chosen testing runtime. A good example can be found
in the Grails web
development framework.
Besides using the ExpandoMetaClass
on a class-level, there is also support for using the meta-class on a per-object
level:
def b = new Book(title: "The Stand")
b.metaClass.getTitle {-> 'My Title' }
assert b.title == 'My Title'
In this case the meta-class change is related to the instance only. Depending on the test scenario this might be a better fit than the global meta-class change.
GDK Methods
The following section gives a brief overview on GDK methods that can be leveraged in test case scenarios, for example for test data generation.
Iterable#combinations
The combinations
method that is added on java.lang.Iterable
compliant classes can be used to get a list of
combinations from a list containing two or more sub-lists:
void testCombinations() {
def combinations = [[2, 3],[4, 5, 6]].combinations()
assert combinations == [[2, 4], [3, 4], [2, 5], [3, 5], [2, 6], [3, 6]]
}
The method could be used in test case scenarios to generate all possible argument combinations for a specific method call.
Iterable#eachCombination
The eachCombination
method that is added on java.lang.Iterable
can be used to apply a function (or in this
case a groovy.lang.Closure
) to each if the combinations that has been built by the combinations
method:
eachCombination
is a GDK method that is added to all classes conforming to the java.lang.Iterable
interface.
It applies a function on each combination of the input lists:
void testEachCombination() {
[[2, 3],[4, 5, 6]].eachCombination { println it[0] + it[1] }
}
The method could be used in the testing context to call methods with each of the generated combinations.
Tool Support
Test Code Coverage
Code coverage is a useful measure of the effectiveness of (unit) tests. A program with high code coverage has a lower chance to hold critical bugs than a program with no or low coverage. To get code coverage metrics, the generated byte-code usually needs to be instrumented before the tests are executed. One tool with Groovy support for this task is Cobertura.
Various frameworks and build tools come with Cobertura integration. For Grails, there is the code coverage plugin based on Cobertura, for Gradle there is the gradle-cobertura plugin, to name only two of them.
The following code listing shows an example on how to enable Cobertura test coverage reports in a Gradle build script from a Groovy project:
def pluginVersion = '<plugin version>'
def groovyVersion = '<groovy version>'
def junitVersion = '<junit version>'
buildscript {
repositories {
mavenCentral()
}
dependencies {
classpath 'com.eriwen:gradle-cobertura-plugin:${pluginVersion}'
}
}
apply plugin: 'groovy'
apply plugin: 'cobertura'
repositories {
mavenCentral()
}
dependencies {
compile "org.codehaus.groovy:groovy-all:${groovyVersion}"
testCompile "junit:junit:${junitVersion}"
}
cobertura {
format = 'html'
includes = ['**/*.java', '**/*.groovy']
excludes = ['com/thirdparty/**/*.*']
}
Several output formats can be chosen for Cobertura coverage reports and test code coverage reports can be added to continuous integration build tasks.
3.6.3. Testing with JUnit
Groovy simplifies JUnit testing in the following ways:
-
You use the same overall practices as you would when testing with Java but you can adopt much of Groovy’s concise syntax in your tests making them succinct. You can even use the capabilities for writing testing domain specific languages (DSLs) if you feel so inclined.
-
There are numerous helper classes that simplify many testing activities. The details differ in some cases depending on the version of JUnit you are using. We’ll cover those details shortly.
-
Groovy’s PowerAssert mechanism is wonderful to use in your tests
-
Groovy deems that tests are so important you should be able to run them as easily as scripts or classes. This is why Groovy includes an automatic test runner when using the
groovy
command or the GroovyConsole. This gives you some additional options over and above running your tests
In the following sections we will have a closer look at JUnit 3, 4 and 5 Groovy integration.
JUnit 3
Maybe one of the most prominent Groovy classes supporting JUnit 3 tests is the GroovyTestCase
class. Being
derived from junit.framework.TestCase
it offers a bunch of additional methods that make testing in Groovy a breeze.
Although GroovyTestCase inherits from TestCase doesn’t mean you can’t use JUnit 4 features in your project. In fact,
the most recent Groovy versions come with a bundled JUnit 4 and that comes with a backwards compatible TestCase
implementation. There have been some discussion on the Groovy mailing-list on whether to use GroovyTestCase or JUnit 4
with the result that it is mostly a matter of taste, but with GroovyTestCase you get a bunch of methods for free that
make certain types of tests easier to write.
|
In this section, we will have a look at some of the methods provided by GroovyTestCase
. A full list of these can be
found in the JavaDoc documentation for groovy.test.GroovyTestCase ,
don’t forget it is inherited from junit.framework.TestCase
which inherits all the assert*
methods.
Assertion Methods
GroovyTestCase
is inherited from junit.framework.TestCase
therefore it inherits a large number of assertion methods
being available to be called in every test method:
class MyTestCase extends GroovyTestCase {
void testAssertions() {
assertTrue(1 == 1)
assertEquals("test", "test")
def x = "42"
assertNotNull "x must not be null", x
assertNull null
assertSame x, x
}
}
As can be seen above, in contrast to Java it is possible to leave out the parenthesis in most situations which leads to even more readability of JUnit assertion method call expressions.
An interesting assertion method that is added by GroovyTestCase
is assertScript
. It ensures that the given Groovy
code string succeeds without any exception:
void testScriptAssertions() {
assertScript '''
def x = 1
def y = 2
assert x + y == 3
'''
}
shouldFail Methods
shouldFail
can be used to check whether the given code block fails or not. In case it fails, the assertion does hold,
otherwise the assertion fails:
void testInvalidIndexAccess1() {
def numbers = [1,2,3,4]
shouldFail {
numbers.get(4)
}
}
The example above uses the basic shouldFail
method interface that takes a groovy.lang.Closure
as a single argument.
The Closure
instance holds the code that is supposed to be breaking during run-time.
If we wanted to assert shouldFail
on a specific java.lang.Exception
type we could have done so by using the shouldFail
implementation that takes the Exception
class as first argument and the Closure
as second argument:
void testInvalidIndexAccess2() {
def numbers = [1,2,3,4]
shouldFail IndexOutOfBoundsException, {
numbers.get(4)
}
}
If anything other than IndexOutOfBoundsException
(or a descendant class of it) is thrown, the test case will fail.
A pretty nice feature of shouldFail
hasn’t been visible so far: it returns the exception message. This is really
useful if you want to assert on the exception error message:
void testInvalidIndexAccess3() {
def numbers = [1,2,3,4]
def msg = shouldFail IndexOutOfBoundsException, {
numbers.get(4)
}
assert msg.contains('Index: 4, Size: 4') ||
msg.contains('Index 4 out-of-bounds for length 4') ||
msg.contains('Index 4 out of bounds for length 4')
}
notYetImplemented Method
The notYetImplemented
method has been greatly influenced by HtmlUnit. It allows to write a test method but mark it
as not yet implemented. As long as the test method fails and is marked with notYetImplemented
the test goes green:
void testNotYetImplemented1() {
if (notYetImplemented()) return (1)
assert 1 == 2 (2)
}
1 | a call to notYetImplemented is necessary for GroovyTestCase to get the current method stack. |
2 | as long as the test evaluates to false the test execution will be successful. |
An alternative to the notYetImplemented
method is the @NotYetImplemented
annotation. It allows for annotating a
method as not yet implemented, with the exact same behavior as GroovyTestCase#notYetImplemented
but without the need
for the notYetImplemented
method call:
@NotYetImplemented
void testNotYetImplemented2() {
assert 1 == 2
}
JUnit 4
Groovy can be used to write JUnit 4 test cases without any restrictions. The groovy.test.GroovyAssert
holds
various static methods that can be used as replacement for the GroovyTestCase
methods in JUnit 4 tests:
import org.junit.Test
import static groovy.test.GroovyAssert.shouldFail
class JUnit4ExampleTests {
@Test
void indexOutOfBoundsAccess() {
def numbers = [1,2,3,4]
shouldFail {
numbers.get(4)
}
}
}
As can be seen in the example above, the static methods found in GroovyAssert
are imported at the beginning of the
class definition thus shouldFail
can be used the same way it can be used in a GroovyTestCase
.
groovy.test.GroovyAssert descends from org.junit.Assert that means it inherits all JUnit assertion methods. However,
with the introduction of the power assertion statement, it turned out to be good practice to rely on assertion statements
instead of using the JUnit assertion methods with the improved message being the main reason.
|
It is worth mentioning that GroovyAssert.shouldFail
is not absolutely identical to GroovyTestCase.shouldFail
. While
GroovyTestCase.shouldFail
returns the exception message, GroovyAssert.shouldFail
returns the exception itself. It
takes a few more keystrokes to get the message, but in return you can access other properties and methods of the
exception:
@Test
void shouldFailReturn() {
def e = shouldFail {
throw new RuntimeException('foo',
new RuntimeException('bar'))
}
assert e instanceof RuntimeException
assert e.message == 'foo'
assert e.cause.message == 'bar'
}
JUnit 5
Much of the approach and helper classes described under JUnit4 apply when using JUnit5 however JUnit5 uses some slightly different class annotations when writing your tests. See the JUnit5 documentation for more details.
Create your test classes as per normal JUnit5 guidelines as shown in this example:
class MyTest {
@Test
void streamSum() {
assertTrue(Stream.of(1, 2, 3)
.mapToInt(i -> i)
.sum() > 5, () -> "Sum should be greater than 5")
}
@RepeatedTest(value=2, name = "{displayName} {currentRepetition}/{totalRepetitions}")
void streamSumRepeated() {
assert Stream.of(1, 2, 3).mapToInt(i -> i).sum() == 6
}
private boolean isPalindrome(s) { s == s.reverse() }
@ParameterizedTest (1)
@ValueSource(strings = [ "racecar", "radar", "able was I ere I saw elba" ])
void palindromes(String candidate) {
assert isPalindrome(candidate)
}
@TestFactory
def dynamicTestCollection() {[
dynamicTest("Add test") { -> assert 1 + 1 == 2 },
dynamicTest("Multiply Test", () -> { assert 2 * 3 == 6 })
]}
}
1 | This test requires the additional org.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter-params dependency if not already in your project. |
You can run the tests in your IDE or build tool if it supports and is configured for JUnit5.
If you run the above test in the GroovyConsole or via the groovy
command, you will see a short text summary of the
result of running the test:
JUnit5 launcher: passed=8, failed=0, skipped=0, time=246ms
More detailed information is available at the FINE
logging level. You can configure your logging to display such
information or do it programmatically as follows:
@BeforeAll
static void init() {
def logger = Logger.getLogger(LoggingListener.name)
logger.level = Level.FINE
logger.addHandler(new ConsoleHandler(level: Level.FINE))
}
3.6.4. Testing with Spock
Spock is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification DSL. In practice, Spock specifications are written as Groovy classes. Although written in Groovy they can be used to test Java classes. Spock can be used for unit, integration or BDD (behavior-driven-development) testing, it doesn’t put itself into a specific category of testing frameworks or libraries.
Beside these awesome features Spock is a good example on how to leverage advanced Groovy programming language features in third party libraries, for example, by using Groovy AST transformations. |
This section should not serve as detailed guide on how to use Spock, it should rather give an impression what Spock is about and how it can be leveraged for unit, integration, functional or any other type of testing. |
The next section we will have an first look at the anatomy of a Spock specification. It should give a pretty good feeling on what Spock is up to.
Specifications
Spock lets you write specifications that describe features (properties, aspects) exhibited by a system of interest. The "system" can be anything between a single class and an entire application, a more advanced term for it is system under specification. The feature description starts from a specific snapshot of the system and its collaborators, this snapshot is called the feature’s fixture.
Spock specification classes are derived from spock.lang.Specification
. A concrete specification class might consist
of fields, fixture methods, features methods and helper methods.
Let’s have a look at a simple specification with a single feature method for an imaginary Stack
class:
class StackSpec extends Specification {
def "adding an element leads to size increase"() { (1)
setup: "a new stack instance is created" (2)
def stack = new Stack()
when: (3)
stack.push 42
then: (4)
stack.size() == 1
}
}
1 | Feature method, is by convention named with a String literal. |
2 | Setup block, here is where any setup work for this feature needs to be done. |
3 | When block describes a stimulus, a certain action under target by this feature specification. |
4 | Then block any expressions that can be used to validate the result of the code that was triggered by the when block. |
Spock feature specifications are defined as methods inside a spock.lang.Specification
class. They describe the feature
by using a String literal instead of a method name.
A feature method holds multiple blocks, in our example we used setup
, when
and then
. The setup
block is special
in that it is optional and allows to configure local variables visible inside the feature method. The when
block
defines the stimulus and is a companion of the then
block which describes the response to the stimulus.
Note that the setup
method in the StackSpec
above additionally
has a description String. Description Strings are optional and can be added after block labels (like setup
, when
,
then
).
More Spock
Spock provides much more features like data tables or advanced mocking capabilities. Feel free to consult the Spock GitHub page for more documentation and download information.
3.6.5. Functional Tests with Geb
Geb is a functional web testing and scraper library that integrates with JUnit and Spock. It is based upon the Selenium web drivers and, like Spock, provides a Groovy DSL to write functional tests for web applications.
Geb has great features that make it a good fit for a functional testing library:
-
DOM access via a JQuery-like
$
function -
implements the page pattern
-
support for modularization of certain web components (e.g. menu-bars, etc.) with modules
-
integration with JavaScript via the JS variable
This section should not serve as detailed guide on how to use Geb, it should rather give an impression what Geb is about and how it can be leveraged functional testing. |
The next section will give an example on how Geb can be used to write a functional test for a simple web page with a single search field.
A Geb Script
Although Geb can be used standalone in a Groovy script, in many scenarios it’s used in combination with other testing frameworks. Geb comes with various base classes that can be used in JUnit 3, 4, TestNG or Spock tests. The base classes are part of additional Geb modules that need to be added as a dependency.
For example, the following @Grab
dependencies can be used to run Geb with the Selenium Firefox driver in
JUnit4 tests. The module that is needed for JUnit 3/4 support is geb-junit4
:
@Grab('org.gebish:geb-core:0.9.2')
@Grab('org.gebish:geb-junit4:0.9.2')
@Grab('org.seleniumhq.selenium:selenium-firefox-driver:2.26.0')
@Grab('org.seleniumhq.selenium:selenium-support:2.26.0')
The central class in Geb is the geb.Browser
class. As its name implies it is used
to browse pages and access DOM elements:
import geb.Browser
import org.openqa.selenium.firefox.FirefoxDriver
def browser = new Browser(driver: new FirefoxDriver(), baseUrl: 'http://myhost:8080/myapp') (1)
browser.drive {
go "/login" (2)
$("#username").text = 'John' (3)
$("#password").text = 'Doe'
$("#loginButton").click()
assert title == "My Application - Dashboard"
}
1 | A new Browser instance is created. In this case it uses the Selenium FirefoxDriver and sets the baseUrl . |
2 | go is used to navigate to an URL or relative URI |
3 | $ together with CSS selectors is used to access the username and password DOM fields. |
The Browser
class comes with a drive
method that delegates all method/property calls to the current
browser
instance. The Browser
configuration must not be done inline, it can also be externalized in a
GebConfig.groovy
configuration file for example. In practice, the usage of the Browser
class is mostly hidden
by Geb test base classes. They delegate all missing properties and method calls to the current browser
instance
that exists in the background:
class SearchTests extends geb.junit4.GebTest {
@Test
void executeSeach() {
go 'http://somehost/mayapp/search' (1)
$('#searchField').text = 'John Doe' (2)
$('#searchButton').click() (3)
assert $('.searchResult a').first().text() == 'Mr. John Doe' (4)
}
}
1 | Browser#go takes a relative or absolute link and calls the page. |
2 | Browser#$ is used to access DOM content. Any CSS selectors supported by the underlying Selenium drivers are allowed |
3 | click is used to click a button. |
4 | $ is used to get the first link out of the searchResult block |
The example above shows a simple Geb web test with the JUnit 4 base class geb.junit4.GebTest
. Note that in this case
the Browser
configuration is externalized. GebTest
delegates methods like go
and $
to the underlying browser
instance.
More Geb
In the previous section we only scratched the surface of the available Geb features. More information on Geb can be found at the project homepage.
3.7. Processing JSON
Groovy comes with integrated support for converting between Groovy objects and JSON. The classes dedicated to
JSON serialisation and parsing are found in the groovy.json
package.
3.7.1. JsonSlurper
JsonSlurper
is a class that parses JSON text or reader content into Groovy data structures (objects) such as maps, lists and
primitive types like Integer
, Double
, Boolean
and String
.
The class comes with a bunch of overloaded parse
methods plus some special methods such as parseText
,
parseFile
and others. For the next example we will use the parseText
method. It parses a JSON String
and recursively converts it to a
list or map of objects. The other parse*
methods are similar in that they return a JSON String
but for different parameter
types.
def jsonSlurper = new JsonSlurper()
def object = jsonSlurper.parseText('{ "name": "John Doe" } /* some comment */')
assert object instanceof Map
assert object.name == 'John Doe'
Notice the result is a plain map and can be handled like a normal Groovy object instance. JsonSlurper
parses the
given JSON as defined by the ECMA-404 JSON Interchange Standard
plus support for JavaScript comments and dates.
In addition to maps JsonSlurper
supports JSON arrays which are converted to lists.
def jsonSlurper = new JsonSlurper()
def object = jsonSlurper.parseText('{ "myList": [4, 8, 15, 16, 23, 42] }')
assert object instanceof Map
assert object.myList instanceof List
assert object.myList == [4, 8, 15, 16, 23, 42]
The JSON standard supports the following primitive data types: string, number, object, true
, false
and null
. JsonSlurper
converts these JSON types into corresponding Groovy types.
def jsonSlurper = new JsonSlurper()
def object = jsonSlurper.parseText '''
{ "simple": 123,
"fraction": 123.66,
"exponential": 123e12
}'''
assert object instanceof Map
assert object.simple.class == Integer
assert object.fraction.class == BigDecimal
assert object.exponential.class == BigDecimal
As JsonSlurper
is returning pure Groovy object instances without any special JSON classes in the back, its usage
is transparent. In fact, JsonSlurper
results conform to GPath expressions. GPath is a powerful expression language
that is supported by multiple slurpers for different data formats (XmlSlurper
for XML being one example).
For more details please have a look at the section on GPath expressions. |
The following table gives an overview of the JSON types and the corresponding Groovy data types:
JSON | Groovy |
---|---|
string |
|
number |
|
object |
|
array |
|
true |
|
false |
|
null |
|
date |
|
Whenever a value in JSON is null , JsonSlurper supplements it with the Groovy null value. This is in contrast to other
JSON parsers that represent a null value with a library-provided singleton object.
|
Parser Variants
JsonSlurper
comes with a couple of parser implementations. Each parser fits different requirements, it could well be that for certain
scenarios the JsonSlurper
default parser is not the best bet for all situations. Here is an overview of the shipped parser implementations:
-
The
JsonParserCharArray
parser basically takes a JSON string and operates on the underlying character array. During value conversion it copies character sub-arrays (a mechanism known as "chopping") and operates on them. -
The
JsonFastParser
is a special variant of theJsonParserCharArray
and is the fastest parser. However, it is not the default parser for a reason.JsonFastParser
is a so-called index-overlay parser. During parsing of the given JSONString
it tries as hard as possible to avoid creating new char arrays orString
instances. It keeps pointers to the underlying original character array only. In addition, it defers object creation as late as possible. If parsed maps are put into long-term caches care must be taken as the map objects might not be created and still consist of pointer to the original char buffer only. However,JsonFastParser
comes with a special chop mode which dices up the char buffer early to keep a small copy of the original buffer. Recommendation is to use theJsonFastParser
for JSON buffers under 2MB and keeping the long-term cache restriction in mind. -
The
JsonParserLax
is a special variant of theJsonParserCharArray
parser. It has similar performance characteristics asJsonFastParser
but differs in that it isn’t exclusively relying on the ECMA-404 JSON grammar. For example it allows for comments, no quote strings etc. -
The
JsonParserUsingCharacterSource
is a special parser for very large files. It uses a technique called "character windowing" to parse large JSON files (large means files over 2MB size in this case) with constant performance characteristics.
The default parser implementation for JsonSlurper
is JsonParserCharArray
. The JsonParserType
enumeration contains constants for
the parser implementations described above:
Implementation | Constant |
---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changing the parser implementation is as easy as setting the JsonParserType
with a call to JsonSlurper#setType()
.
def jsonSlurper = new JsonSlurper(type: JsonParserType.INDEX_OVERLAY)
def object = jsonSlurper.parseText('{ "myList": [4, 8, 15, 16, 23, 42] }')
assert object instanceof Map
assert object.myList instanceof List
assert object.myList == [4, 8, 15, 16, 23, 42]
3.7.2. JsonOutput
JsonOutput
is responsible for serialising Groovy objects into JSON strings. It can be seen as companion object to
JsonSlurper, being a JSON parser.
JsonOutput
comes with overloaded, static toJson
methods. Each toJson
implementation takes a different parameter type.
The static methods can either be used directly or by importing the methods with a static import statement.
The result of a toJson
call is a String
containing the JSON code.
def json = JsonOutput.toJson([name: 'John Doe', age: 42])
assert json == '{"name":"John Doe","age":42}'
JsonOutput
does not only support primitive, maps or list data types to be serialized to JSON, it goes further and even
has support for serialising POGOs, that is, plain-old Groovy objects.
class Person { String name }
def json = JsonOutput.toJson([ new Person(name: 'John'), new Person(name: 'Max') ])
assert json == '[{"name":"John"},{"name":"Max"}]'
Customizing Output
If you need control over the serialized output you can use a JsonGenerator
. The JsonGenerator.Options
builder
can be used to create a customized generator. One or more options can be set on this builder in order to alter
the resulting output. When you are done setting the options simply call the build()
method in order to get a fully
configured instance that will generate output based on the options selected.
class Person {
String name
String title
int age
String password
Date dob
URL favoriteUrl
}
Person person = new Person(name: 'John', title: null, age: 21, password: 'secret',
dob: Date.parse('yyyy-MM-dd', '1984-12-15'),
favoriteUrl: new URL('http://groovy-lang.org/'))
def generator = new JsonGenerator.Options()
.excludeNulls()
.dateFormat('yyyy@MM')
.excludeFieldsByName('age', 'password')
.excludeFieldsByType(URL)
.build()
assert generator.toJson(person) == '{"dob":"1984@12","name":"John"}'
A closure can be used to transform a type. These closure converters are registered for a given type and will be
called any time that type or a subtype is encountered. The first parameter to the closure is an object matching the
type for which the converter is registered and this parameter is required. The closure may take an optional second
String
parameter and this will be set to the key name if one is available.
class Person {
String name
URL favoriteUrl
}
Person person = new Person(name: 'John', favoriteUrl: new URL('http://groovy-lang.org/json.html#_jsonoutput'))
def generator = new JsonGenerator.Options()
.addConverter(URL) { URL u, String key ->
if (key == 'favoriteUrl') {
u.getHost()
} else {
u
}
}
.build()
assert generator.toJson(person) == '{"favoriteUrl":"groovy-lang.org","name":"John"}'
// No key available when generating a JSON Array
def list = [new URL('http://groovy-lang.org/json.html#_jsonoutput')]
assert generator.toJson(list) == '["http://groovy-lang.org/json.html#_jsonoutput"]'
// First parameter to the converter must match the type for which it is registered
shouldFail(IllegalArgumentException) {
new JsonGenerator.Options()
.addConverter(Date) { Calendar cal -> }
}
Formatted Output
As we saw in previous examples, the JSON output is not pretty printed per default. However, the prettyPrint
method in JsonOutput
comes
to rescue for this task.
def json = JsonOutput.toJson([name: 'John Doe', age: 42])
assert json == '{"name":"John Doe","age":42}'
assert JsonOutput.prettyPrint(json) == '''\
{
"name": "John Doe",
"age": 42
}'''.stripIndent()
prettyPrint
takes a String
as single parameter; therefore, it can be applied on arbitrary JSON String
instances, not only the result of
JsonOutput.toJson
.
Builders
Another way to create JSON from Groovy is to use JsonBuilder
or StreamingJsonBuilder
. Both builders provide a
DSL which allows to formulate an object graph which is then converted to JSON.
For more details on builders, have a look at the builders chapter which covers both JsonBuilder and StreamingJsonBuilder. |
3.8. Interacting with a SQL database
Groovy’s groovy-sql
module provides a higher-level abstraction over Java’s JDBC technology. JDBC itself provides
a lower-level but fairly comprehensive API which provides uniform access to a whole variety of supported relational database systems.
We’ll use HSQLDB in our examples here but you can alternatively use Oracle, SQL Server, MySQL and a host of others.
The most frequently used class within the groovy-sql
module is the groovy.sql.Sql
class which raises the JDBC
abstractions up one level. We’ll cover that first.
3.8.1. Connecting to the database
Connecting to a database with Groovy’s Sql
class requires four pieces of information:
-
The database uniform resource locator (URL)
-
Username
-
Password
-
The driver class name (which can be derived automatically in some situations)
For our HSQLDB database, the values will be something like that shown in the following table:
Property | Value |
---|---|
url |
|
user |
sa (or your username) |
password |
yourPassword |
driver |
|
Consult the documentation for the JDBC driver that you plan to use to determine the correct values for your situation.
The Sql
class has a newInstance
factory method which takes these parameters. You would typically use it as follows:
import groovy.sql.Sql
def url = 'jdbc:hsqldb:mem:yourDB'
def user = 'sa'
def password = ''
def driver = 'org.hsqldb.jdbcDriver'
def sql = Sql.newInstance(url, user, password, driver)
// use 'sql' instance ...
sql.close()
If you don’t want to have to handle resource handling yourself (i.e. call close()
manually) then you can use the withInstance
variation as shown here:
withInstance
variation)Sql.withInstance(url, user, password, driver) { sql ->
// use 'sql' instance ...
}
Connecting with a DataSource
It is often preferred to use a DataSource. You may have one available to you from a connection pool. Here we’ll use the one provided as part of the HSQLDB driver jar as shown here:
import groovy.sql.Sql
import org.hsqldb.jdbc.JDBCDataSource
def dataSource = new JDBCDataSource(
database: 'jdbc:hsqldb:mem:yourDB', user: 'sa', password: '')
def sql = new Sql(dataSource)
// use then close 'sql' instance ...
If you have your own connection pooling, the details will be different, e.g. for Apache Commons DBCP:
@Grab('commons-dbcp:commons-dbcp:1.4')
import groovy.sql.Sql
import org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSource
def ds = new BasicDataSource(driverClassName: "org.hsqldb.jdbcDriver",
url: 'jdbc:hsqldb:mem:yourDB', username: 'sa', password: '')
def sql = new Sql(ds)
// use then close 'sql' instance ...
Connecting using @Grab
The previous examples assume that the necessary database driver jar is already on your classpath.
For a self-contained script you can add @Grab
statements to the top of the script to automatically download the necessary jar as shown here:
@Grab('org.hsqldb:hsqldb:2.5.1')
@GrabConfig(systemClassLoader=true)
// create, use, and then close sql instance ...
The @GrabConfig
statement is necessary to make sure the system classloader is used. This ensures that the driver classes and
system classes like java.sql.DriverManager
are in the same classloader.
3.8.2. Executing SQL
You can execute arbitrary SQL commands using the execute()
method. Let’s have a look at using it to create a table.
Creating tables
The simplest way to execute SQL is to call the execute()
method passing the SQL you wish to execute as a String as shown here:
// ... create 'sql' instance
sql.execute '''
CREATE TABLE Author (
id INTEGER GENERATED BY DEFAULT AS IDENTITY,
firstname VARCHAR(64),
lastname VARCHAR(64)
);
'''
// close 'sql' instance ...
There is a variant of this method which takes a GString and another with a list of parameters. There are also other variants with similar names: executeInsert
and executeUpdate
.
We’ll see examples of these variants in other examples in this section.
3.8.3. Basic CRUD operations
The basic operations on a database are Create, Read, Update and Delete (the so-called CRUD operations). We’ll examine each of these in turn.
Creating/Inserting data
You can use the same execute()
statement we saw earlier but to insert a row by using a SQL insert statement as follows:
sql.execute "INSERT INTO Author (firstname, lastname) VALUES ('Dierk', 'Koenig')"
You can use a special executeInsert
method instead of execute
. This will return a list of all keys generated.
Both the execute
and executeInsert
methods allow you to place '?' placeholders into your SQL string and supply a list of parameters.
In this case a PreparedStatement is used which avoids any risk of SQL injection. The following example illustrates executeInsert
using placeholders and parameters:
def insertSql = 'INSERT INTO Author (firstname, lastname) VALUES (?,?)'
def params = ['Jon', 'Skeet']
def keys = sql.executeInsert insertSql, params
assert keys[0] == [1]
In addition, both the execute
and executeInsert
methods allow you to use GStrings. Any '$' placeholders within the SQL are assumed
to be placeholders. An escaping mechanism exists if you want to supply part of the GString with a variable in a
position which isn’t where normal placeholders go within SQL. See the GroovyDoc for more details.
Also, executeInsert
allows you to supply a list of key column names, when multiple keys are returned and you are only interested in some of them.
Here is a fragment illustrating key name specification and GStrings:
def first = 'Guillaume'
def last = 'Laforge'
def myKeyNames = ['ID']
def myKeys = sql.executeInsert """
INSERT INTO Author (firstname, lastname)
VALUES (${first}, ${last})
""", myKeyNames
assert myKeys[0] == [ID: 2]
Reading rows
Reading rows of data from the database is accomplished using one of several available methods: query
, eachRow
, firstRow
and rows
.
Use the query
method if you want to iterate through the ResultSet
returned by the underlying JDBC API as shown here:
query
def expected = ['Dierk Koenig', 'Jon Skeet', 'Guillaume Laforge']
def rowNum = 0
sql.query('SELECT firstname, lastname FROM Author') { resultSet ->
while (resultSet.next()) {
def first = resultSet.getString(1)
def last = resultSet.getString('lastname')
assert expected[rowNum++] == "$first $last"
}
}
Use the eachRow
method if you want a slightly higher-level abstraction which provides a Groovy friendly map-like abstraction for the ResultSet
as shown here:
eachRow
rowNum = 0
sql.eachRow('SELECT firstname, lastname FROM Author') { row ->
def first = row[0]
def last = row.lastname
assert expected[rowNum++] == "$first $last"
}
Note that you can use Groovy list-style and map-style notations when accessing the row of data.
Use the firstRow
method if you for similar functionality as eachRow
but returning only one row of data as shown here:
firstRow
def first = sql.firstRow('SELECT lastname, firstname FROM Author')
assert first.values().sort().join(',') == 'Dierk,Koenig'
Use the rows
method if you want to process a list of map-like data structures as shown here:
rows
List authors = sql.rows('SELECT firstname, lastname FROM Author')
assert authors.size() == 3
assert authors.collect { "$it.FIRSTNAME ${it[-1]}" } == expected
Note that the map-like abstraction has case-insensitive keys (hence we can use 'FIRSTNAME' or 'firstname' as the key) and also that -ve indices (a standard Groovy feature) works when using an index value (to count column numbers from the right).
You can also use any of the above methods to return scalar values, though typically firstRow
is all that is required in such cases. An example returning the count of rows is shown here:
assert sql.firstRow('SELECT COUNT(*) AS num FROM Author').num == 3
Updating rows
Updating rows can again be done using the execute()
method. Just use a SQL update statement as the argument to the method.
You can insert an author with just a lastname and then update the row to also have a firstname as follows:
sql.execute "INSERT INTO Author (lastname) VALUES ('Thorvaldsson')"
sql.execute "UPDATE Author SET firstname='Erik' where lastname='Thorvaldsson'"
There is also a special executeUpdate
variant which returns the number of rows updated as a result of executing the SQL.
For example, you can change the lastname of an author as follows:
def updateSql = "UPDATE Author SET lastname='Pragt' where lastname='Thorvaldsson'"
def updateCount = sql.executeUpdate updateSql
assert updateCount == 1
def row = sql.firstRow "SELECT * FROM Author where firstname = 'Erik'"
assert "${row.firstname} ${row.lastname}" == 'Erik Pragt'
3.8.4. Advanced SQL operations
Working with transactions
The easiest way to perform database operations within a transaction is to include the database operation within a withTransaction
closure as shown in the following example:
assert sql.firstRow('SELECT COUNT(*) as num FROM Author').num == 0
sql.withTransaction {
sql.execute "INSERT INTO Author (firstname, lastname) VALUES ('Dierk', 'Koenig')"
sql.execute "INSERT INTO Author (firstname, lastname) VALUES ('Jon', 'Skeet')"
}
assert sql.firstRow('SELECT COUNT(*) as num FROM Author').num == 2
Here the database starts empty and has two rows after successful completion of the operation. Outside the scope of the transaction, the database is never seen as having just one row.
If something goes wrong, any earlier operations within the withTransaction
block are rolled back.
We can see that in operation in the following example where we use database metadata (more details coming up shortly) to find the
maximum allowable size of the firstname
column and then attempt to enter a firstname one larger than that maximum value as shown here:
def maxFirstnameLength
def metaClosure = { meta -> maxFirstnameLength = meta.getPrecision(1) }
def rowClosure = {}
def rowCountBefore = sql.firstRow('SELECT COUNT(*) as num FROM Author').num
try {
sql.withTransaction {
sql.execute "INSERT INTO Author (firstname) VALUES ('Dierk')"
sql.eachRow "SELECT firstname FROM Author WHERE firstname = 'Dierk'", metaClosure, rowClosure
sql.execute "INSERT INTO Author (firstname) VALUES (?)", 'X' * (maxFirstnameLength + 1)
}
} catch(ignore) { println ignore.message }
def rowCountAfter = sql.firstRow('SELECT COUNT(*) as num FROM Author').num
assert rowCountBefore == rowCountAfter
Even though the first sql execute succeeds initially, it will be rolled back and the number of rows will remain the same.
Using batches
When dealing with large volumes of data, particularly when inserting such data, it can be more efficient to chunk the data into batches. This is done
using the withBatch
statement as shown in the following example:
sql.withBatch(3) { stmt ->
stmt.addBatch "INSERT INTO Author (firstname, lastname) VALUES ('Dierk', 'Koenig')"
stmt.addBatch "INSERT INTO Author (firstname, lastname) VALUES ('Paul', 'King')"
stmt.addBatch "INSERT INTO Author (firstname, lastname) VALUES ('Guillaume', 'Laforge')"
stmt.addBatch "INSERT INTO Author (firstname, lastname) VALUES ('Hamlet', 'D''Arcy')"
stmt.addBatch "INSERT INTO Author (firstname, lastname) VALUES ('Cedric', 'Champeau')"
stmt.addBatch "INSERT INTO Author (firstname, lastname) VALUES ('Erik', 'Pragt')"
stmt.addBatch "INSERT INTO Author (firstname, lastname) VALUES ('Jon', 'Skeet')"
}
After executing these statements, there will be 7 new rows in the database. In fact, they will have been added in batches
even though you can’t easily tell that after that fact. If you want to confirm what is going on under the covers, you can
add a little bit of extra logging into your program. Add the following lines before the withBatch
statement:
import java.util.logging.*
// next line will add fine logging
Logger.getLogger('groovy.sql').level = Level.FINE
// also adjust logging.properties file in JRE_HOME/lib to have:
// java.util.logging.ConsoleHandler.level = FINE
With this extra logging turned on, and the changes made as per the above comment for the logging.properties file, you should see output such as:
FINE: Successfully executed batch with 3 command(s)
Apr 19, 2015 8:38:42 PM groovy.sql.BatchingStatementWrapper processResult
FINE: Successfully executed batch with 3 command(s)
Apr 19, 2015 8:38:42 PM groovy.sql.BatchingStatementWrapper processResult
FINE: Successfully executed batch with 1 command(s)
Apr 19, 2015 8:38:42 PM groovy.sql.Sql getStatement
We should also note, that any combination of SQL statements can be added to the batch. They don’t all have to be inserting a new row to the same table.
We noted earlier that to avoid SQL injection, we encourage you to use prepared statements, this is achieved using the variants of methods which take GStrings or a list of extra parameters. Prepared statements can be used in combination with batches as shown in the following example:
def qry = 'INSERT INTO Author (firstname, lastname) VALUES (?,?)'
sql.withBatch(3, qry) { ps ->
ps.addBatch('Dierk', 'Koenig')
ps.addBatch('Paul', 'King')
ps.addBatch('Guillaume', 'Laforge')
ps.addBatch('Hamlet', "D'Arcy")
ps.addBatch('Cedric', 'Champeau')
ps.addBatch('Erik', 'Pragt')
ps.addBatch('Jon', 'Skeet')
}
This provides a much safer option if the data could come from a user such as via a script or a web form. Of course, given that a prepared statement is being used, you are limited to a batch of the same SQL operation (insert in our example) to the one table.
Performing pagination
When presenting large tables of data to a user, it is often convenient to present information a page at
a time. Many of Groovy’s SQL retrieval methods have extra parameters which can be used to select a particular
page of interest. The starting position and page size are specified as integers as shown in the following example
using rows
:
def qry = 'SELECT * FROM Author'
assert sql.rows(qry, 1, 3)*.firstname == ['Dierk', 'Paul', 'Guillaume']
assert sql.rows(qry, 4, 3)*.firstname == ['Hamlet', 'Cedric', 'Erik']
assert sql.rows(qry, 7, 3)*.firstname == ['Jon']
Fetching metadata
JDBC metadata can be retrieved in numerous ways. Perhaps the most basic approach is to extract the metadata from any row as shown in the following example which examines the tablename, column names and column type names:
sql.eachRow("SELECT * FROM Author WHERE firstname = 'Dierk'") { row ->
def md = row.getMetaData()
assert md.getTableName(1) == 'AUTHOR'
assert (1..md.columnCount).collect{ md.getColumnName(it) } == ['ID', 'FIRSTNAME', 'LASTNAME']
assert (1..md.columnCount).collect{ md.getColumnTypeName(it) } == ['INTEGER', 'VARCHAR', 'VARCHAR']
}
And another slight variant to the previous example, this time also looking at the column label:
sql.eachRow("SELECT firstname AS first FROM Author WHERE firstname = 'Dierk'") { row ->
def md = row.getMetaData()
assert md.getColumnName(1) == 'FIRSTNAME'
assert md.getColumnLabel(1) == 'FIRST'
}
Accessing metadata is quite common, so Groovy also provides variants to many of its methods that let you
supply a closure that will be called once with the row metadata in addition to the normal row closure
which is called for each row. The following example illustrates the two closure variant for eachRow
:
def metaClosure = { meta -> assert meta.getColumnName(1) == 'FIRSTNAME' }
def rowClosure = { row -> assert row.FIRSTNAME == 'Dierk' }
sql.eachRow("SELECT firstname FROM Author WHERE firstname = 'Dierk'", metaClosure, rowClosure)
Note that our SQL query will only return one row, so we could have equally used firstRow
for the previous example.
Finally, JDBC also provides metadata per connection (not just for rows). You can also access such metadata from Groovy as shown in this example:
def md = sql.connection.metaData
assert md.driverName == 'HSQL Database Engine Driver'
assert md.databaseProductVersion == '2.5.1'
assert ['JDBCMajorVersion', 'JDBCMinorVersion'].collect{ md[it] } == [4, 2]
assert md.stringFunctions.tokenize(',').contains('CONCAT')
def rs = md.getTables(null, null, 'AUTH%', null)
assert rs.next()
assert rs.getString('TABLE_NAME') == 'AUTHOR'
Consult the JavaDoc for your driver to find out what metadata information is available for you to access.
Named and named-ordinal parameters
Groovy supports some additional alternative placeholder syntax variants. The GString variants
are typically preferred over these alternatives but the alternatives are useful for Java integration
purposes and sometimes in templating scenarios where GStrings might already be in heavy use as part
of a template. The named parameter variants are much like the String plus list of parameter variants but
instead of having a list of ?
placeholders followed by a list of parameters, you have one or more
placeholders having the form :propName
or ?.propName
and a single map, named arguments or a
domain object as the parameter. The map or domain object should have a property named propName
corresponding to each supplied placeholder.
Here is an example using the colon form:
sql.execute "INSERT INTO Author (firstname, lastname) VALUES (:first, :last)", first: 'Dierk', last: 'Koenig'
And another example using the question mark form:
sql.execute "INSERT INTO Author (firstname, lastname) VALUES (?.first, ?.last)", first: 'Jon', last: 'Skeet'
If the information you need to supply is spread across multiple maps or domain objects you can use the question mark form with an additional ordinal index as shown here:
class Rockstar { String first, last }
def pogo = new Rockstar(first: 'Paul', last: 'McCartney')
def map = [lion: 'King']
sql.execute "INSERT INTO Author (firstname, lastname) VALUES (?1.first, ?2.lion)", pogo, map
Stored procedures
The exact syntax for creating a stored procedure or function varies slightly between different databases. For the HSQLDB database we are using, we can create a stored function which returns the initials of all authors in a table as follows:
sql.execute """
CREATE FUNCTION SELECT_AUTHOR_INITIALS()
RETURNS TABLE (firstInitial VARCHAR(1), lastInitial VARCHAR(1))
READS SQL DATA
RETURN TABLE (
SELECT LEFT(Author.firstname, 1) as firstInitial, LEFT(Author.lastname, 1) as lastInitial
FROM Author
)
"""
We can use a SQL CALL
statement to invoke the function using Groovy’s normal SQL retrieval methods.
Here is an example using eachRow
.
def result = []
sql.eachRow('CALL SELECT_AUTHOR_INITIALS()') {
result << "$it.firstInitial$it.lastInitial"
}
assert result == ['DK', 'JS', 'GL']
Here is the code for creating another stored function, this one taking the lastname as a parameter:
sql.execute """
CREATE FUNCTION FULL_NAME (p_lastname VARCHAR(64))
RETURNS VARCHAR(100)
READS SQL DATA
BEGIN ATOMIC
DECLARE ans VARCHAR(100);
SELECT CONCAT(firstname, ' ', lastname) INTO ans
FROM Author WHERE lastname = p_lastname;
RETURN ans;
END
"""
We can use the placeholder syntax to specify where the parameter belongs and note the special placeholder position to indicate the result:
def result = sql.firstRow("{? = call FULL_NAME(?)}", ['Koenig'])
assert result[0] == 'Dierk Koenig'
Finally, here is a stored procedure with input and output parameters:
sql.execute """
CREATE PROCEDURE CONCAT_NAME (OUT fullname VARCHAR(100),
IN first VARCHAR(50), IN last VARCHAR(50))
BEGIN ATOMIC
SET fullname = CONCAT(first, ' ', last);
END
"""
To use the CONCAT_NAME
stored procedure parameter, we make use of a special call
method. Any input parameters are simply provided
as parameters to the method call. For output parameters, the resulting type must be specified as shown here:
sql.call("{call CONCAT_NAME(?, ?, ?)}", [Sql.VARCHAR, 'Dierk', 'Koenig']) {
fullname -> assert fullname == 'Dierk Koenig'
}
sql.execute """
CREATE PROCEDURE CHECK_ID_POSITIVE_IN_OUT ( INOUT p_err VARCHAR(64), IN pparam INTEGER, OUT re VARCHAR(15))
BEGIN ATOMIC
IF pparam > 0 THEN
set p_err = p_err || '_OK';
set re = 'RET_OK';
ELSE
set p_err = p_err || '_ERROR';
set re = 'RET_ERROR';
END IF;
END;
"""
def scall = "{call CHECK_ID_POSITIVE_IN_OUT(?, ?, ?)}"
sql.call scall, [Sql.inout(Sql.VARCHAR("MESSAGE")), 1, Sql.VARCHAR], {
res, p_err -> assert res == 'MESSAGE_OK' && p_err == 'RET_OK'
}
3.8.5. Using DataSets
Groovy provides a groovy.sql.DataSet class which enhances the groovy.sql.Sql class with what can be thought of as mini ORM functionality. Databases are accessed and queried using POGO fields and operators rather than JDBC-level API calls and RDBMS column names.
So, instead of a query like:
def qry = """SELECT * FROM Author
WHERE (firstname > ?)
AND (lastname < ?)
ORDER BY lastname DESC"""
def params = ['Dierk', 'Pragt']
def result = sql.rows(qry, params)
assert result*.firstname == ['Eric', 'Guillaume', 'Paul']
You can write code like this:
def authorDS = sql.dataSet('Author')
def result = authorDS.findAll{ it.firstname > 'Dierk' }
.findAll{ it.lastname < 'Pragt' }
.sort{ it.lastname }
.reverse()
assert result.rows()*.firstname == ['Eric', 'Guillaume', 'Paul']
Here we have a helper "domain" class:
class Author {
String firstname
String lastname
}
Database access and manipulation involves creating or working with instances of the domain class.
3.9. Processing XML
3.9.1. Parsing XML
XmlParser and XmlSlurper
The most commonly used approach for parsing XML with Groovy is to use one of:
-
groovy.xml.XmlParser
-
groovy.xml.XmlSlurper
Both have the same approach to parse an xml. Both come with a bunch of
overloaded parse methods plus some special methods such as parseText
,
parseFile and others. For the next example we will use the parseText
method. It parses a XML String
and recursively converts it to a list
or map of objects.
def text = '''
<list>
<technology>
<name>Groovy</name>
</technology>
</list>
'''
def list = new XmlSlurper().parseText(text) (1)
assert list instanceof groovy.xml.slurpersupport.GPathResult (2)
assert list.technology.name == 'Groovy' (3)
1 | Parsing the XML an returning the root node as a GPathResult |
2 | Checking we’re using a GPathResult |
3 | Traversing the tree in a GPath style |
def text = '''
<list>
<technology>
<name>Groovy</name>
</technology>
</list>
'''
def list = new XmlParser().parseText(text) (1)
assert list instanceof groovy.util.Node (2)
assert list.technology.name.text() == 'Groovy' (3)
1 | Parsing the XML an returning the root node as a Node |
2 | Checking we’re using a Node |
3 | Traversing the tree in a GPath style |
Let’s see the similarities between XMLParser
and XMLSlurper
first:
-
Both are based on
SAX
so they both are low memory footprint -
Both can update/transform the XML
But they have key differences:
-
XmlSlurper
evaluates the structure lazily. So if you update the xml you’ll have to evaluate the whole tree again. -
XmlSlurper
returnsGPathResult
instances when parsing XML -
XmlParser
returnsNode
objects when parsing XML
When to use one or the another?
There is a discussion at StackOverflow. The conclusions written here are based partially on this entry. |
-
If you want to transform an existing document to another then
XmlSlurper
will be the choice -
If you want to update and read at the same time then
XmlParser
is the choice.
The rationale behind this is that every time you create a node with
XmlSlurper
it won’t be available until you parse the document again
with another XmlSlurper
instance. Need to read just a few nodes
XmlSlurper is for you ".
-
If you just have to read a few nodes
XmlSlurper
should be your choice, since it will not have to create a complete structure in memory"
In general both classes perform similar way. Even the way of using
GPath expressions with them are the same (both use breadthFirst()
and
depthFirst()
expressions). So I guess it depends on the write/read
frequency.
DOMCategory
There is another way of parsing XML documents with Groovy with the
used of groovy.xml.dom.DOMCategory
which is a category class which
adds GPath style operations to Java’s DOM classes.
Java has in-built support for DOM processing of XML using classes
representing the various parts of XML documents, e.g. Document ,
Element , NodeList , Attr etc. For more information about these classes,
refer to the respective JavaDocs.
|
Having a XML like the following:
static def CAR_RECORDS = '''
<records>
<car name='HSV Maloo' make='Holden' year='2006'>
<country>Australia</country>
<record type='speed'>Production Pickup Truck with speed of 271kph</record>
</car>
<car name='P50' make='Peel' year='1962'>
<country>Isle of Man</country>
<record type='size'>Smallest Street-Legal Car at 99cm wide and 59 kg in weight</record>
</car>
<car name='Royale' make='Bugatti' year='1931'>
<country>France</country>
<record type='price'>Most Valuable Car at $15 million</record>
</car>
</records>
'''
You can parse it using groovy.xml.DOMBuilder
and
groovy.xml.dom.DOMCategory
.
def reader = new StringReader(CAR_RECORDS)
def doc = DOMBuilder.parse(reader) (1)
def records = doc.documentElement
use(DOMCategory) { (2)
assert records.car.size() == 3
}
1 | Parsing the XML |
2 | Creating DOMCategory scope to be able to use helper method calls |
3.9.2. GPath
The most common way of querying XML in Groovy is using GPath
:
GPath is a path expression language integrated into Groovy which allows parts of nested structured data to be identified. In this sense, it has similar aims and scope as XPath does for XML. The two main places where you use GPath expressions is when dealing with nested POJOs or when dealing with XML
It is similar to XPath expressions and you can use it not only with XML but also with POJO classes. As an example, you can specify a path to an object or element of interest:
-
a.b.c
→ for XML, yields all the<c>
elements inside<b>
inside<a>
-
a.b.c
→ all POJOs, yields the<c>
properties for all the<b>
properties of<a>
(sort of like a.getB().getC() in JavaBeans)
For XML, you can also specify attributes, e.g.:
-
a["@href"]
→ the href attribute of all the a elements -
a.'@href'
→ an alternative way of expressing this -
a.@href
→ an alternative way of expressing this when using XmlSlurper
Let’s illustrate this with an example:
static final String books = '''
<response version-api="2.0">
<value>
<books>
<book available="20" id="1">
<title>Don Quixote</title>
<author id="1">Miguel de Cervantes</author>
</book>
<book available="14" id="2">
<title>Catcher in the Rye</title>
<author id="2">JD Salinger</author>
</book>
<book available="13" id="3">
<title>Alice in Wonderland</title>
<author id="3">Lewis Carroll</author>
</book>
<book available="5" id="4">
<title>Don Quixote</title>
<author id="4">Miguel de Cervantes</author>
</book>
</books>
</value>
</response>
'''
Simply traversing the tree
First thing we could do is to get a value using POJO’s notation. Let’s get the first book’s author’s name
def response = new XmlSlurper().parseText(books)
def authorResult = response.value.books.book[0].author
assert authorResult.text() == 'Miguel de Cervantes'
First we parse the document with XmlSlurper
and the we have to
consider the returning value as the root of the XML document, so in
this case is "response".
That’s why we start traversing the document from response and then
value.books.book[0].author
. Note that in XPath
the node arrays starts
in [1] instead of [0], but because GPath
is Java-based it begins at
index 0.
In the end we’ll have the instance of the author
node and because we
wanted the text inside that node we should be calling the text()
method. The author
node is an instance of GPathResult
type and
text()
a method giving us the content of that node as a String.
When using GPath
with an xml parsed with XmlSlurper
we’ll have as a
result a GPathResult
object. GPathResult
has many other convenient
methods to convert the text inside a node to any other type such as:
-
toInteger()
-
toFloat()
-
toBigInteger()
-
…
All these methods try to convert a String
to the appropriate type.
If we were using a XML parsed with XmlParser
we could be dealing with
instances of type Node
. But still all the actions applied to
GPathResult
in these examples could be applied to a Node as
well. Creators of both parsers took into account GPath
compatibility.
Next step is to get the some values from a given node’s attribute. In the following sample we want to get the first book’s author’s id. We’ll be using two different approaches. Let’s see the code first:
def response = new XmlSlurper().parseText(books)
def book = response.value.books.book[0] (1)
def bookAuthorId1 = book.@id (2)
def bookAuthorId2 = book['@id'] (3)
assert bookAuthorId1 == '1' (4)
assert bookAuthorId1.toInteger() == 1 (5)
assert bookAuthorId1 == bookAuthorId2
1 | Getting the first book node |
2 | Getting the book’s id attribute @id |
3 | Getting the book’s id attribute with map notation ['@id'] |
4 | Getting the value as a String |
5 | Getting the value of the attribute as an Integer |
As you can see there are two types of notations to get attributes, the
-
direct notation with
@nameoftheattribute
-
map notation using
['@nameoftheattribute']
Both of them are equally valid.
Flexible navigation with children (*), depthFirst (**) and breadthFirst
If you ever have used XPath, you may have used expressions like:
-
/following-sibling::othernode
: Look for a node "othernode" in the same level -
//
: Look everywhere
More or less we have their counterparts in GPath with the shortcuts *
(aka children()
) and **
(aka depthFirst()
).
The first example shows a simple use of *
, which only iterates over the direct children of the node.
def response = new XmlSlurper().parseText(books)
// .'*' could be replaced by .children()
def catcherInTheRye = response.value.books.'*'.find { node ->
// node.@id == 2 could be expressed as node['@id'] == 2
node.name() == 'book' && node.@id == '2'
}
assert catcherInTheRye.title.text() == 'Catcher in the Rye'
This test searches for any child nodes of the "books" node matching the given condition. In a bit more detail, the expression says: Look for any node with a tag name equal to 'book' having an id with a value of '2' directly under the 'books' node.
This operation roughly corresponds to the breadthFirst()
method, except that
it only stops at one level instead of continuing to the inner levels.
What if we would like to look for a given value
without having to know exactly where it is. Let’s say that the
only thing we know is the id of the author "Lewis Carroll" . How are
we going to be able to find that book? Using **
is the solution:
def response = new XmlSlurper().parseText(books)
// .'**' could be replaced by .depthFirst()
def bookId = response.'**'.find { book ->
book.author.text() == 'Lewis Carroll'
}.@id
assert bookId == 3
**
is the same as looking for something everywhere in the
tree from this point down. In this case, we’ve used the method
find(Closure cl)
to find just the first occurrence.
What if we want to collect all book’s titles? That’s easy, just use findAll
:
def response = new XmlSlurper().parseText(books)
def titles = response.'**'.findAll { node -> node.name() == 'title' }*.text()
assert titles.size() == 4
In the last two examples, **
is used as a shortcut for the depthFirst()
method. It goes as far down the tree as it can while navigating down the
tree from a given node. The breadthFirst()
method finishes off all nodes
on a given level before traversing down to the next level.
The following example shows the difference between these two methods:
def response = new XmlSlurper().parseText(books)
def nodeName = { node -> node.name() }
def withId2or3 = { node -> node.@id in [2, 3] }
assert ['book', 'author', 'book', 'author'] ==
response.value.books.depthFirst().findAll(withId2or3).collect(nodeName)
assert ['book', 'book', 'author', 'author'] ==
response.value.books.breadthFirst().findAll(withId2or3).collect(nodeName)
In this example, we search for any nodes with an id attribute with value 2 or 3.
There are both book
and author
nodes that match that criteria. The different
traversal orders will find the same nodes in each case but in different orders
corresponding to how the tree was traversed.
It is worth mentioning again that there are some useful methods converting a node’s value to an integer, float, etc. Those methods could be convenient when doing comparisons like this:
def response = new XmlSlurper().parseText(books)
def titles = response.value.books.book.findAll { book ->
/* You can use toInteger() over the GPathResult object */
book.@id.toInteger() > 2
}*.title
assert titles.size() == 2
In this case the number 2 has been hardcoded but imagine that value could have come from any other source (database… etc.).
3.9.3. Creating XML
The most commonly used approach for creating XML with Groovy is to use a builder, i.e. one of:
-
groovy.xml.MarkupBuilder
-
groovy.xml.StreamingMarkupBuilder
MarkupBuilder
Here is an example of using Groovy’s MarkupBuilder to create a new XML file:
def writer = new StringWriter()
def xml = new MarkupBuilder(writer) (1)
xml.records() { (2)
car(name: 'HSV Maloo', make: 'Holden', year: 2006) {
country('Australia')
record(type: 'speed', 'Production Pickup Truck with speed of 271kph')
}
car(name: 'Royale', make: 'Bugatti', year: 1931) {
country('France')
record(type: 'price', 'Most Valuable Car at $15 million')
}
}
def records = new XmlSlurper().parseText(writer.toString()) (3)
assert records.car.first().name.text() == 'HSV Maloo'
assert records.car.last().name.text() == 'Royale'
1 | Create an instance of MarkupBuilder |
2 | Start creating the XML tree |
3 | Create an instance of XmlSlurper to traverse and test the
generated XML |
Let’s take a look a little bit closer:
def xmlString = "<movie>the godfather</movie>" (1)
def xmlWriter = new StringWriter() (2)
def xmlMarkup = new MarkupBuilder(xmlWriter)
xmlMarkup.movie("the godfather") (3)
assert xmlString == xmlWriter.toString() (4)
1 | We’re creating a reference string to compare against |
2 | The xmlWriter instance is used by MarkupBuilder to convert the
xml representation to a String instance eventually |
3 | The xmlMarkup.movie(…) call will create a XML node with a tag
called movie and with content the godfather . |
def xmlString = "<movie id='2'>the godfather</movie>"
def xmlWriter = new StringWriter()
def xmlMarkup = new MarkupBuilder(xmlWriter)
xmlMarkup.movie(id: "2", "the godfather") (1)
assert xmlString == xmlWriter.toString()
1 | This time in order to create both attributes and node content you can create as many map entries as you like and finally add a value to set the node’s content |
The value could be any Object , the value will be serialized to its
String representation.
|
def xmlWriter = new StringWriter()
def xmlMarkup = new MarkupBuilder(xmlWriter)
xmlMarkup.movie(id: 2) { (1)
name("the godfather")
}
def movie = new XmlSlurper().parseText(xmlWriter.toString())
assert movie.@id == 2
assert movie.name.text() == 'the godfather'
1 | A closure represents the children elements of a given node. Notice this time instead of using a String for the attribute we’re using a number. |
Sometimes you may want to use a specific namespace in your xml documents:
def xmlWriter = new StringWriter()
def xmlMarkup = new MarkupBuilder(xmlWriter)
xmlMarkup
.'x:movies'('xmlns:x': 'http://www.groovy-lang.org') { (1)
'x:movie'(id: 1, 'the godfather')
'x:movie'(id: 2, 'ronin')
}
def movies =
new XmlSlurper() (2)
.parseText(xmlWriter.toString())
.declareNamespace(x: 'http://www.groovy-lang.org')
assert movies.'x:movie'.last().@id == 2
assert movies.'x:movie'.last().text() == 'ronin'
1 | Creating a node with a given namespace xmlns:x |
2 | Creating a XmlSlurper registering the namespace to be able to
test the XML we just created |
What about having some more meaningful example. We may want to generate more elements, to have some logic when creating our XML:
def xmlWriter = new StringWriter()
def xmlMarkup = new MarkupBuilder(xmlWriter)
xmlMarkup
.'x:movies'('xmlns:x': 'http://www.groovy-lang.org') {
(1..3).each { n -> (1)
'x:movie'(id: n, "the godfather $n")
if (n % 2 == 0) { (2)
'x:movie'(id: n, "the godfather $n (Extended)")
}
}
}
def movies =
new XmlSlurper()
.parseText(xmlWriter.toString())
.declareNamespace(x: 'http://www.groovy-lang.org')
assert movies.'x:movie'.size() == 4
assert movies.'x:movie'*.text().every { name -> name.startsWith('the') }
1 | Generating elements from a range |
2 | Using a conditional for creating a given element |
Of course the instance of a builder can be passed as a parameter to refactor/modularize your code:
def xmlWriter = new StringWriter()
def xmlMarkup = new MarkupBuilder(xmlWriter)
(1)
Closure<MarkupBuilder> buildMovieList = { MarkupBuilder builder ->
(1..3).each { n ->
builder.'x:movie'(id: n, "the godfather $n")
if (n % 2 == 0) {
builder.'x:movie'(id: n, "the godfather $n (Extended)")
}
}
return builder
}
xmlMarkup.'x:movies'('xmlns:x': 'http://www.groovy-lang.org') {
buildMovieList(xmlMarkup) (2)
}
def movies =
new XmlSlurper()
.parseText(xmlWriter.toString())
.declareNamespace(x: 'http://www.groovy-lang.org')
assert movies.'x:movie'.size() == 4
assert movies.'x:movie'*.text().every { name -> name.startsWith('the') }
1 | In this case we’ve created a Closure to handle the creation of a list of movies |
2 | Just using the buildMovieList function when necessary |
StreamingMarkupBuilder
The class groovy.xml.StreamingMarkupBuilder
is a builder class for
creating XML markup. This implementation uses a
groovy.xml.streamingmarkupsupport.StreamingMarkupWriter
to handle
output.
def xml = new StreamingMarkupBuilder().bind { (1)
records {
car(name: 'HSV Maloo', make: 'Holden', year: 2006) { (2)
country('Australia')
record(type: 'speed', 'Production Pickup Truck with speed of 271kph')
}
car(name: 'P50', make: 'Peel', year: 1962) {
country('Isle of Man')
record(type: 'size', 'Smallest Street-Legal Car at 99cm wide and 59 kg in weight')
}
car(name: 'Royale', make: 'Bugatti', year: 1931) {
country('France')
record(type: 'price', 'Most Valuable Car at $15 million')
}
}
}
def records = new XmlSlurper().parseText(xml.toString()) (3)
assert records.car.size() == 3
assert records.car.find { it.@name == 'P50' }.country.text() == 'Isle of Man'
1 | Note that StreamingMarkupBuilder.bind returns a Writable
instance that may be used to stream the markup to a Writer |
2 | We’re capturing the output in a String to parse it again an check
the structure of the generated XML with XmlSlurper . |
MarkupBuilderHelper
The groovy.xml.MarkupBuilderHelper
is, as its name reflects, a
helper for groovy.xml.MarkupBuilder
.
This helper normally can be accessed from within an instance of class
groovy.xml.MarkupBuilder
or an instance of
groovy.xml.StreamingMarkupBuilder
.
This helper could be handy in situations when you may want to:
-
Produce a comment in the output
-
Produce an XML processing instruction in the output
-
Produce an XML declaration in the output
-
Print data in the body of the current tag, escaping XML entities
-
Print data in the body of the current tag
In both MarkupBuilder
and StreamingMarkupBuilder
this helper is
accessed by the property mkp
:
def xmlWriter = new StringWriter()
def xmlMarkup = new MarkupBuilder(xmlWriter).rules {
mkp.comment('THIS IS THE MAIN RULE') (1)
rule(sentence: mkp.yield('3 > n')) (2)
}
(3)
assert xmlWriter.toString().contains('3 > n')
assert xmlWriter.toString().contains('<!-- THIS IS THE MAIN RULE -->')
1 | Using mkp to create a comment in the XML |
2 | Using mkp to generate an escaped value |
3 | Checking both assumptions were true |
Here is another example to show the use of mkp
property accessible
from within the bind
method scope when using
StreamingMarkupBuilder
:
def xml = new StreamingMarkupBuilder().bind {
records {
car(name: mkp.yield('3 < 5')) (1)
car(name: mkp.yieldUnescaped('1 < 3')) (2)
}
}
assert xml.toString().contains('3 < 5')
assert xml.toString().contains('1 < 3')
1 | If we want to generate a escaped value for the name attribute with
mkp.yield |
2 | Checking the values later on with XmlSlurper |
DOMToGroovy
Suppose we have an existing XML document and we want to automate
generation of the markup without having to type it all in? We just
need to use org.codehaus.groovy.tools.xml.DOMToGroovy
as shown in
the following example:
def songs = """
<songs>
<song>
<title>Here I go</title>
<band>Whitesnake</band>
</song>
</songs>
"""
def builder =
javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance().newDocumentBuilder()
def inputStream = new ByteArrayInputStream(songs.bytes)
def document = builder.parse(inputStream)
def output = new StringWriter()
def converter = new DomToGroovy(new PrintWriter(output)) (1)
converter.print(document) (2)
String xmlRecovered =
new GroovyShell()
.evaluate("""
def writer = new StringWriter()
def builder = new groovy.xml.MarkupBuilder(writer)
builder.${output}
return writer.toString()
""") (3)
assert new XmlSlurper().parseText(xmlRecovered).song.title.text() == 'Here I go' (4)
1 | Creating DOMToGroovy instance |
2 | Converts the XML to MarkupBuilder calls which are available in the output StringWriter |
3 | Using output variable to create the whole MarkupBuilder |
4 | Back to XML string |
3.9.4. Manipulating XML
In this chapter you’ll see the different ways of adding / modifying /
removing nodes using XmlSlurper
or XmlParser
. The xml we are going
to be handling is the following:
def xml = """
<response version-api="2.0">
<value>
<books>
<book id="2">
<title>Don Quixote</title>
<author id="1">Miguel de Cervantes</author>
</book>
</books>
</value>
</response>
"""
Adding nodes
The main difference between XmlSlurper
and XmlParser
is that when
former creates the nodes they won’t be available until the document’s
been evaluated again, so you should parse the transformed document
again in order to be able to see the new nodes. So keep that in mind
when choosing any of both approaches.
If you needed to see a node right after creating it then XmlParser
should be your choice, but if you’re planning to do many changes to
the XML and send the result to another process maybe XmlSlurper
would
be more efficient.
You can’t create a new node directly using the XmlSlurper
instance,
but you can with XmlParser
. The way of creating a new node from
XmlParser is through its method createNode(..)
def parser = new XmlParser()
def response = parser.parseText(xml)
def numberOfResults = parser.createNode(
response,
new QName("numberOfResults"),
[:]
)
numberOfResults.value = "1"
assert response.numberOfResults.text() == "1"
The createNode()
method receives the following parameters:
-
parent node (could be null)
-
The qualified name for the tag (In this case we only use the local part without any namespace). We’re using an instance of
groovy.namespace.QName
-
A map with the tag’s attributes (None in this particular case)
Anyway you won’t normally be creating a node from the parser instance
but from the parsed XML instance. That is from a Node
or a
GPathResult
instance.
Take a look at the next example. We are parsing the xml with XmlParser
and then creating a new node from the parsed document’s instance
(Notice the method here is slightly different in the way it receives
the parameters):
def parser = new XmlParser()
def response = parser.parseText(xml)
response.appendNode(
new QName("numberOfResults"),
[:],
"1"
)
response.numberOfResults.text() == "1"
When using XmlSlurper
, GPathResult
instances don’t have createNode()
method.
Modifying / Removing nodes
We know how to parse the document, add new nodes, now I want to change
a given node’s content. Let’s start using XmlParser
and Node
. This
example changes the first book information to actually another book.
def response = new XmlParser().parseText(xml)
/* Use the same syntax as groovy.xml.MarkupBuilder */
response.value.books.book[0].replaceNode { (1)
book(id: "3") {
title("To Kill a Mockingbird")
author(id: "3", "Harper Lee")
}
}
def newNode = response.value.books.book[0]
assert newNode.name() == "book"
assert newNode.@id == "3"
assert newNode.title.text() == "To Kill a Mockingbird"
assert newNode.author.text() == "Harper Lee"
assert newNode.author.@id.first() == "3"
When using replaceNode()
the closure we pass as parameter should
follow the same rules as if we were using groovy.xml.MarkupBuilder
:
Here’s the same example using XmlSlurper
:
def response = new XmlSlurper().parseText(books)
/* Use the same syntax as groovy.xml.MarkupBuilder */
response.value.books.book[0].replaceNode {
book(id: "3") {
title("To Kill a Mockingbird")
author(id: "3", "Harper Lee")
}
}
assert response.value.books.book[0].title.text() == "Don Quixote"
/* That mkp is a special namespace used to escape away from the normal building mode
of the builder and get access to helper markup methods
'yield', 'pi', 'comment', 'out', 'namespaces', 'xmlDeclaration' and
'yieldUnescaped' */
def result = new StreamingMarkupBuilder().bind { mkp.yield response }.toString()
def changedResponse = new XmlSlurper().parseText(result)
assert changedResponse.value.books.book[0].title.text() == "To Kill a Mockingbird"
Notice how using XmlSlurper
we have to parse the transformed document
again in order to find the created nodes. In this particular example
could be a little bit annoying isn’t it?
Finally both parsers also use the same approach for adding a new
attribute to a given attribute. This time again the difference is
whether you want the new nodes to be available right away or
not. First XmlParser
:
def parser = new XmlParser()
def response = parser.parseText(xml)
response.@numberOfResults = "1"
assert response.@numberOfResults == "1"
And XmlSlurper
:
def response = new XmlSlurper().parseText(books)
response.@numberOfResults = "2"
assert response.@numberOfResults == "2"
When using XmlSlurper
, adding a new attribute does not require you to perform a new evaluation.
Printing XML
XmlUtil
Sometimes is useful to get not only the value of a given node but the node itself (for instance to add this node to another XML).
For that you can use groovy.xml.XmlUtil
class. It has several static
methods to serialize the xml fragment from several type of sources
(Node, GPathResult, String…)
def response = new XmlParser().parseText(xml)
def nodeToSerialize = response.'**'.find { it.name() == 'author' }
def nodeAsText = XmlUtil.serialize(nodeToSerialize)
assert nodeAsText ==
XmlUtil.serialize('<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><author id="1">Miguel de Cervantes</author>')
3.10. Scripting Ant tasks
Groovy integrates very well with Apache Ant thanks to AntBuilder.
3.11. The <groovy> Ant Task
3.11.1. <groovy>
Here we describe an Ant task for using Groovy
from within an Ant build file.
You may also be interested in
Ant’s built-in script task
which supports Groovy and other languages, or
AntBuilder which lets you write Ant build scripts
in Groovy rather than XML.
|
Executes a series of Groovy statements from Apache Ant. Statements can either be read in from a resource or as direct text between the enclosing Groovy tags.
3.11.2. Required taskdef
Assuming all the groovy jars you need are in my.classpath (this will be groovy-VERSION.jar
,
groovy-ant-VERSION.jar
plus any modules and transitive dependencies you might be using)
you will need to declare this task at some point in the build.xml
prior to
the groovy
task being invoked.
<taskdef name="groovy"
classname="org.codehaus.groovy.ant.Groovy"
classpathref="my.classpath"/>
You can simply place statements between the groovy
tags like this:
<groovy>
...
</groovy>
Or you can supply the Groovy source script as a resource. You can specify the pathname using the src
attribute like this:
<groovy src="/some/path/MyGroovyScript.groovy" otherAttributes="...">
Or as a nested fileset
like this (though the fileset definition is expected to select just one file):
<groovy>
<fileset file="MyGroovyScript.groovy"/>
</groovy>
Or as a nested single element resource collection which could look like any of these:
<groovy>
<file file="MyGroovyScript.groovy"/>
</groovy>
<groovy>
<url url="https://some.domain/some/path/to/MyGroovyScript.groovy"/>
</groovy>
<groovy>
<javaconstant name="some.packagename.SomeClass.MY_CODE_FRAGMENT"/>
</groovy>
You may also supply a filter chain like this:
<groovy>
<fileset file="MyGroovyScript.groovy"/>
<!-- take 5 lines after skipping 18 lines, just as an example -->
<filterchain>
<headfilter lines="5" skip="18"/>
</filterchain>
</groovy>
You might need to use the contextClassLoader attribute (see below) if any of your modules load services via the classpath, e.g. groovy-json
.
3.11.3. <groovy> attributes
Attribute | Description | Required |
---|---|---|
contextClassLoader |
If enabled, the contextClassLoader to be set with the classLoader of the shell used to run the script. Not used if fork is true. |
No |
src |
File containing Groovy statements. The directory containing the file is added to the classpath. |
Yes, unless statements enclosed within tags |
classpath |
The classpath to use. |
No |
classpathref |
The classpath to use, given as reference to a PATH defined elsewhere. |
No |
output |
Set the output file; defaults to the Ant log. |
No |
append |
If enabled and output is to a file, append to existing file rather than overwrite. Defaults to false. |
No |
fork |
If enabled the script will be executed in a forked JVM process (disabled by default). |
No |
scriptBaseClass |
The name of the base class for scripts. |
No |
indy |
If enabled the script will be executed with |
No |
parameters |
Generates metadata for reflection on method parameter names on JDK 8 and above. Defaults to false. |
No |
useGroovyShell |
If enabled a new GroovyShell is used to run the script. Special variables won’t be available but you don’t need Ant in the classpath. Defaults to false. |
No |
includeAntRuntime |
If enabled the system classpath will be included on the classpath when forking. Defaults to true. |
No |
stacktrace |
If enabled a stacktrace will be reported if an error occurs during compilation. Defaults to false. |
No |
configScript |
Sets the configuration script for the groovy compiler configuration. |
No |
3.11.4. Parameters specified as nested elements
<classpath>
Groovy’s classpath attribute is a PATH like structure and can also be set via a nested classpath element.
<arg>
Arguments can be set via one or more nested <arg> elements using the standard Ant command line conventions.
3.11.5. Available bindings
A number of bindings are in scope for use within your Groovy statements.
Name | Description |
---|---|
args |
command line arguments, if any |
ant |
an instance of |
project |
the current ant project |
properties |
a |
target |
the owning target that invoked this groovy script |
task |
the wrapping task, can access anything needed in |
3.11.6. Examples
Hello world, version 1:
<groovy>
println "Hello World"
</groovy>
Hello world, version 2:
<groovy>
ant.echo "Hello World"
</groovy>
List all xml files in the current directory:
<groovy>
xmlfiles = new File(".").listFiles().findAll{ it =~ "\.xml$" }
xmlfiles.sort().each { println it.toString() }
</groovy>
List all xml files within a jar:
<zipfileset id="found" src="foobar.jar"
includes="**/*.xml"/>
<groovy>
project.references.found.each {
println it.name
}
</groovy>
Run a script:
<groovy src="/some/directory/some/file.groovy">
<classpath>
<pathelement location="/my/groovy/classes/directory"/>
</classpath>
</groovy>
Find all Builder
classes having an org.*
package within a directory of jars:
<property name="local.target" value="C:/Projects/GroovyExamples"/>
<groovy>
import java.util.jar.JarFile
def classes = []
def resourceNamePattern = /org\/.*\/.*Builder.class/
def jarNamePattern = /.*(beta|commons).*jar$/
def libdir = new File("${properties['local.target']}/lib")
libdir.listFiles().grep(~jarNamePattern).each { candidate ->
new JarFile(candidate).entries().each { entry ->
if (entry.name ==~ resourceNamePattern) classes += entry.name
}
}
properties["builder-classes"] = classes.join(' ')
</groovy>
<echo message='${builder-classes}'/>
Which might result in something like:
org/apache/commons/cli/PatternOptionBuilder.class org/apache/commons/cli/OptionBuilder.class org/codehaus/groovy/tools/groovydoc/GroovyRootDocBuilder.class org/custommonkey/xmlunit/HTMLDocumentBuilder.class org/custommonkey/xmlunit/TolerantSaxDocumentBuilder.class
FileScanner version of above (with a slight variation on collecting the names):
<groovy>
import java.util.jar.JarFile
def resourceNamePattern = /org\/.*\/.*Builder.class/
def candidates = ant.fileScanner {
fileset(dir: '${local.target}/lib') {
include(name: '*beta*.jar')
include(name: '*commons*.jar')
}
}
def classes = candidates.collect {
new JarFile(it).entries().collect { it.name }.findAll {
it ==~ resourceNamePattern
}
}.flatten()
properties["builder-classes"] = classes.join(' ')
</groovy>
Calling out to a web service from your Ant script:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<project name="SOAP example" default="main" basedir=".">
<property environment="env"/>
<property name="celsius" value="0"/>
<target name="main">
<taskdef name="groovy" classname="org.codehaus.groovy.ant.Groovy">
<classpath>
<fileset dir="${env.GROOVY_HOME}" includes="lib/groovy-*.jar,lib/ivy*.jar"/>
</classpath>
</taskdef>
<groovy>
@Grab('org.codehaus.groovy.modules:groovyws:0.5.1')
import groovyx.net.ws.WSClient
def url = 'http://www.w3schools.com/webservices/tempconvert.asmx?WSDL'
def proxy = new WSClient(url, this.class.classLoader)
proxy.initialize()
ant.echo "I'm freezing at ${properties.celsius} degrees Celsius"
properties.result = proxy.CelsiusToFahrenheit(properties.celsius)
</groovy>
<antcall target="results"/>
</target>
<target name="results">
<echo message="I'm freezing at ${result} degrees Fahrenheit"/>
</target>
</project>
Which will output the following (along with some informational messages):
main:
...
[echo] I'm freezing at 0 degrees Celsius
results:
[echo] I'm freezing at 32 degrees Fahrenheit
BUILD SUCCESSFUL
Setting arguments:
<target name="run">
<groovy>
<arg line="1 2 3"/>
<arg value="4 5"/>
println args.size()
println args[2]
args.each{ ant.echo(message:it) }
</groovy>
</target>
Output:
Buildfile: build.xml
run:
[groovy] 4
[groovy] 3
[echo] 1
[echo] 2
[echo] 3
[echo] 4 5
BUILD SUCCESSFUL
3.12. Template engines
3.12.1. Introduction
Groovy supports multiple ways to generate text dynamically including GStrings
, printf
and MarkupBuilder just to name a few. In addition to these, there is a dedicated template framework which is well-suited to applications where the text to be generated follows the form of a static template.
3.12.2. Template framework
The template framework in Groovy consists of a TemplateEngine
abstract base class that engines must implement and a Template
interface that the resulting templates they generate must implement.
Included with Groovy are several template engines:
-
SimpleTemplateEngine
- for basic templates -
StreamingTemplateEngine
- functionally equivalent toSimpleTemplateEngine
, but can handle strings larger than 64k -
GStringTemplateEngine
- stores the template as writeable closures (useful for streaming scenarios) -
XmlTemplateEngine
- works well when the template and output are valid XML -
MarkupTemplateEngine
- a very complete, optimized, template engine
3.12.3. SimpleTemplateEngine
Shown here is the SimpleTemplateEngine
that allows you to use JSP-like scriptlets (see example below), script, and EL expressions in your template in order to generate parametrized text. Here is an example of using the system:
def text = 'Dear "$firstname $lastname",\nSo nice to meet you in <% print city %>.\nSee you in ${month},\n${signed}'
def binding = ["firstname":"Sam", "lastname":"Pullara", "city":"San Francisco", "month":"December", "signed":"Groovy-Dev"]
def engine = new groovy.text.SimpleTemplateEngine()
def template = engine.createTemplate(text).make(binding)
def result = 'Dear "Sam Pullara",\nSo nice to meet you in San Francisco.\nSee you in December,\nGroovy-Dev'
assert result == template.toString()
While it is generally not deemed good practice to mix processing logic in your template (or view), sometimes very simple logic can be useful. E.g. in the example above, we could change this:
$firstname
to this (assuming we have set up a static import for capitalize inside the template):
${firstname.capitalize()}
or this:
<% print city %>
to this:
<% print city == "New York" ? "The Big Apple" : city %>
Advanced Usage Note
If you happen to be embedding your template directly in your script (as we did above) you have to be careful about backslash escaping. Because the template string itself will be parsed by Groovy before it is passed to the templating framework, you have to escape any backslashes inside GString expressions or scriptlet 'code' that are entered as part of a Groovy program. E.g. if we wanted quotes around The Big Apple above, we would use:
<% print city == "New York" ? "\\"The Big Apple\\"" : city %>
Similarly, if we wanted a newline, we would use:
\\n
in any GString expression or scriptlet 'code' that appears inside a Groovy script. A normal “\n” is fine within the static template text itself or if the entire template itself is in an external template file. Similarly, to represent an actual backslash in your text you would need
\\\\
in an external file or
\\\\
in any GString expression or scriptlet 'code'. (Note: the necessity to have this extra slash may go away in a future version of Groovy if we can find an easy way to support such a change.)
3.12.4. StreamingTemplateEngine
The StreamingTemplateEngine
engine is functionally equivalent to the SimpleTemplateEngine
, but creates the template using writable closures making it more scalable for large templates. Specifically this template engine can handle strings larger than 64k.
It uses JSP style <% %> script and <%= %> expression syntax or GString style expressions. The variable 'out' is bound to the writer that the template is being written to.
Frequently, the template source will be a file but here we show a simple example providing the template as a string:
def text = '''\
Dear <% out.print firstname %> ${lastname},
We <% if (accepted) out.print 'are pleased' else out.print 'regret' %> \
to inform you that your paper entitled
'$title' was ${ accepted ? 'accepted' : 'rejected' }.
The conference committee.'''
def template = new groovy.text.StreamingTemplateEngine().createTemplate(text)
def binding = [
firstname : "Grace",
lastname : "Hopper",
accepted : true,
title : 'Groovy for COBOL programmers'
]
String response = template.make(binding)
assert response == '''Dear Grace Hopper,
We are pleased to inform you that your paper entitled
'Groovy for COBOL programmers' was accepted.
The conference committee.'''
3.12.5. GStringTemplateEngine
As an example of using the GStringTemplateEngine
, here is the example above done again (with a few changes to show some other options). First we will store the template in a file this time:
Dear "$firstname $lastname",
So nice to meet you in <% out << (city == "New York" ? "\\"The Big Apple\\"" : city) %>.
See you in ${month},
${signed}
Note that we used out
instead of print
to support the streaming nature of GStringTemplateEngine
. Because we have the template in a separate file, there is no need to escape the backslashes. Here is how we call it:
def f = new File('test.template')
def engine = new groovy.text.GStringTemplateEngine()
def template = engine.createTemplate(f).make(binding)
println template.toString()
and here is the output:
Dear "Sam Pullara", So nice to meet you in "The Big Apple". See you in December, Groovy-Dev
3.12.6. XmlTemplateEngine
XmlTemplateEngine
for use in templating scenarios where both the template source and the expected output are intended to be XML. Templates may use the normal ${expression}
and $variable
notations to insert an arbitrary expression into the template. In addition, support is also provided for special tags: <gsp:scriptlet>
(for inserting code fragments) and <gsp:expression>
(for code fragments which produce output).
Comments and processing instructions will be removed as part of processing and special XML characters such as <
, >
, "
and '
will be escaped using the respective XML notation. The output will also be indented using standard XML pretty printing.
The xmlns namespace definition for gsp: tags will be removed but other namespace definitions will be preserved (but may change to an equivalent position within the XML tree).
Normally, the template source will be in a file but here is a simple example providing the XML template as a string:
def binding = [firstname: 'Jochen', lastname: 'Theodorou', nickname: 'blackdrag', salutation: 'Dear']
def engine = new groovy.text.XmlTemplateEngine()
def text = '''\
<document xmlns:gsp='http://groovy.codehaus.org/2005/gsp' xmlns:foo='baz' type='letter'>
<gsp:scriptlet>def greeting = "${salutation}est"</gsp:scriptlet>
<gsp:expression>greeting</gsp:expression>
<foo:to>$firstname "$nickname" $lastname</foo:to>
How are you today?
</document>
'''
def template = engine.createTemplate(text).make(binding)
println template.toString()
This example will produce this output:
<document type='letter'>
Dearest
<foo:to xmlns:foo='baz'>
Jochen "blackdrag" Theodorou
</foo:to>
How are you today?
</document>
3.12.7. The MarkupTemplateEngine
This template engine is a template engine primarily aimed at generating XML-like markup (XML, XHTML, HTML5, …), but that can be used to generate any text based content. Unlike traditional template engines, this one relies on a DSL that uses the builder syntax. Here is a sample template:
xmlDeclaration()
cars {
cars.each {
car(make: it.make, model: it.model)
}
}
If you feed it with the following model:
model = [cars: [new Car(make: 'Peugeot', model: '508'), new Car(make: 'Toyota', model: 'Prius')]]
It would be rendered as:
<?xml version='1.0'?>
<cars><car make='Peugeot' model='508'/><car make='Toyota' model='Prius'/></cars>
The key features of this template engine are:
-
a markup builder like syntax
-
templates are compiled into bytecode
-
fast rendering
-
optional type checking of the model
-
includes
-
internationalization support
-
fragments/layouts
The template format
Basics
Templates consist of Groovy code. Let’s explore the first example more thoroughly:
xmlDeclaration() (1)
cars { (2)
cars.each { (3)
car(make: it.make, model: it.model) (4)
} (5)
}
1 | renders the XML declaration string. |
2 | opens a cars tag |
3 | cars is a variable found in the template model, which is a list of Car instances |
4 | for each item, we create a car tag with the attributes from the Car instance |
5 | closes the cars tag |
As you can see, regular Groovy code can be used in the template. Here, we are calling each
on a list (retrieved from the model), allowing us to
render one car
tag per entry.
In a similar fashion, rendering HTML code is as simple as this:
yieldUnescaped '<!DOCTYPE html>' (1)
html(lang:'en') { (2)
head { (3)
meta('http-equiv':'"Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"') (4)
title('My page') (5)
} (6)
body { (7)
p('This is an example of HTML contents') (8)
} (9)
} (10)
1 | renders the HTML doctype special tag |
2 | opens the html tag with an attribute |
3 | opens the head tag |
4 | renders a meta tag with one http-equiv attribute |
5 | renders the title tag |
6 | closes the head tag |
7 | opens the body tag |
8 | renders a p tag |
9 | closes the body tag |
10 | closes the html tag |
The output is straightforward:
<!DOCTYPE html><html lang='en'><head><meta http-equiv='"Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"'/><title>My page</title></head><body><p>This is an example of HTML contents</p></body></html>
With some configuration, you can have the output pretty printed, with newlines and indent automatically added. |
Support methods
In the previous example, the doctype declaration was rendered using the yieldUnescaped
method. We have also seen the xmlDeclaration
method.
The template engine provides several support methods that will help you render contents appropriately:
Method | Description | Example |
---|---|---|
yield |
Renders contents, but escapes it before rendering |
Template:
Output:
|
yieldUnescaped |
Renders raw contents. The argument is rendered as is, without escaping. |
Template:
Output:
|
xmlDeclaration |
Renders an XML declaration String. If the encoding is specified in the configuration, it is written in the declaration. |
Template:
Output:
If Output:
|
comment |
Renders raw contents inside an XML comment |
Template:
Output:
|
newLine |
Renders a new line. See also |
Template:
Output:
|
pi |
Renders an XML processing instruction. |
Template:
Output:
|
tryEscape |
Returns an escaped string for an object, if it is a |
Template:
Output:
|
Includes
The MarkupTemplateEngine
supports inclusion of contents from another file. Included contents may be:
-
another template
-
raw contents
-
contents to be escaped
Including another template can be done using:
include template: 'other_template.tpl'
Including a file as raw contents, without escaping it, can be done like this:
include unescaped: 'raw.txt'
Eventually, inclusion of text that should be escaped before rendering can be done using:
include escaped: 'to_be_escaped.txt'
Alternatively, you can use the following helper methods instead:
-
includeGroovy(<name>)
to include another template -
includeEscaped(<name>)
to include another file with escaping -
includeUnescaped(<name>)
to include another file without escaping
Calling those methods instead of the include xxx:
syntax can be useful if the name of the file to be included is dynamic (stored in a variable for example).
Files to be included (independently of their type, template or text) are found on classpath. This is one of the reasons why the MarkupTemplateEngine
takes
an optional ClassLoader
as constructor argument (the other reason being that you can include code referencing other classes in a template).
If you don’t want your templates to be on classpath, the MarkupTemplateEngine
accepts a convenient constructor that lets you define the directory where
templates are to be found.
Fragments
Fragments are nested templates. They can be used to provide improved composition in a single template. A fragment consists of a string, the inner template, and a model, used to render this template. Consider the following template:
ul {
pages.each {
fragment "li(line)", line:it
}
}
The fragment
element creates a nested template, and renders it with a model which is specific to this template. Here,
we have the li(line)
fragment, where line
is bound to it
. Since it
corresponds to the iteration of pages
,
we will generate a single li
element for each page in our model:
<ul><li>Page 1</li><li>Page 2</li></ul>
Fragments are interesting to factorize template elements. They come at the price of the compilation of a fragment per template, and they cannot be externalized.
Layouts
Layouts, unlike fragments, refer to other templates. They can be used to compose templates and share common structures. This is often interesting if you have, for example, a common HTML page setup, and that you only want to replace the body. This can be done easily with a layout. First of all, you need to create a layout template:
html {
head {
title(title) (1)
}
body {
bodyContents() (2)
}
}
1 | the title variable (inside the title tag) is a layout variable |
2 | the bodyContents call will render the body |
Then what you need is a template that includes the layout:
layout 'layout-main.tpl', (1)
title: 'Layout example', (2)
bodyContents: contents { p('This is the body') } (3)
1 | use the main-layout.tpl layout file |
2 | set the title variable |
3 | set the bodyContents |
As you can see, bodyContents
will be rendered inside the layout, thanks to the bodyContents()
call in the layout file. As
a result, the template will be rendered as this:
<html><head><title>Layout example</title></head><body><p>This is the body</p></body></html>
The call to the contents
method is used to tell the template engine that the block of code is in fact a specification of a
template, instead of a helper function to be rendered directly. If you don’t add contents
before your specification, then
the contents would be rendered, but you would also see a random string generated, corresponding to the result value of the block.
Layouts are a powerful way to share common elements across multiple templates, without having to rewrite everything or use includes.
Layouts use, by default, a model which is independent from the model of the page where they are used. It is however possible to make them inherit from the parent model. Imagine that the model is defined like this:
model = new HashMap<String,Object>();
model.put('title','Title from main model');
and the following template:
layout 'layout-main.tpl', true, (1)
bodyContents: contents { p('This is the body') }
1 | note the use of true to enable model inheritance |
then it is not necessary to pass the title
value to the layout as in the previous example. The result will be:
<html><head><title>Title from main model</title></head><body><p>This is the body</p></body></html>
But it is also possible to override a value from the parent model:
layout 'layout-main.tpl', true, (1)
title: 'overridden title', (2)
bodyContents: contents { p('This is the body') }
1 | true means inherit from the parent model |
2 | but title is overridden |
then the output will be:
<html><head><title>overridden title</title></head><body><p>This is the body</p></body></html>
Rendering contents
Creation of a template engine
On the server side, rendering templates require an instance of groovy.text.markup.MarkupTemplateEngine
and a
groovy.text.markup.TemplateConfiguration
:
TemplateConfiguration config = new TemplateConfiguration(); (1)
MarkupTemplateEngine engine = new MarkupTemplateEngine(config); (2)
Template template = engine.createTemplate("p('test template')"); (3)
Map<String, Object> model = new HashMap<>(); (4)
Writable output = template.make(model); (5)
output.writeTo(writer); (6)
1 | creates a template configuration |
2 | creates a template engine with this configuration |
3 | creates a template instance from a String |
4 | creates a model to be used in the template |
5 | bind the model to the template instance |
6 | render output |
There are several possible options to parse templates:
-
from a
String
, usingcreateTemplate(String)
-
from a
Reader
, usingcreateTemplate(Reader)
-
from a
URL
, usingcreateTemplate(URL)
-
given a template name, using
createTemplateByPath(String)
The last version should in general be preferred:
Template template = engine.createTemplateByPath("main.tpl");
Writable output = template.make(model);
output.writeTo(writer);
Configuration options
The behavior of the engine can be tweaked with several configuration options accessible through the TemplateConfiguration
class:
Option | Default value | Description | Example |
---|---|---|---|
declarationEncoding |
null |
Determines the value of the encoding to be written when |
Template:
Output:
If Output:
|
expandEmptyElements |
false |
If true, empty tags are rendered in their expanded form. |
Template:
Output:
If Output:
|
useDoubleQuotes |
false |
If true, use double quotes for attributes instead of simple quotes |
Template:
Output:
If Output:
|
newLineString |
System default (system property |
Allows to choose what string is used when a new line is rendered |
Template:
If Output:
|
autoEscape |
false |
If true, variables from models are automatically escaped before rendering. |
|
autoIndent |
false |
If true, performs automatic indentation after new lines |
|
autoIndentString |
four (4) spaces |
The string to be used as indent. |
|
autoNewLine |
false |
If true, performs automatic insertion of new lines |
|
baseTemplateClass |
|
Sets the super class of compiled templates. This can be used to provide application specific templates. |
|
locale |
Default locale |
Sets the default locale for templates. |
Once the template engine has been created, it is unsafe to change the configuration. |
Automatic formatting
By default, the template engine will render output without any specific formatting. Some configuration options can improve the situation:
-
autoIndent
is responsible for auto-indenting after a new line is inserted -
autoNewLine
is responsible for automatically inserting new lines based on the original formatting of the template source
In general, it is recommended to set both autoIndent
and autoNewLine
to true if you want human-readable, pretty printed, output:
config.setAutoNewLine(true);
config.setAutoIndent(true);
Using the following template:
html {
head {
title('Title')
}
}
The output will now be:
<html>
<head>
<title>Title</title>
</head>
</html>
We can slightly change the template so that the title
instruction is found on the same line as the head
one:
html {
head { title('Title')
}
}
And the output will reflect that:
<html>
<head><title>Title</title>
</head>
</html>
New lines are only inserted where curly braces for tags are found, and the insertion corresponds to where the nested content is found. This means that tags in the body of another tag will not trigger new lines unless they use curly braces themselves:
html {
head {
meta(attr:'value') (1)
title('Title') (2)
newLine() (3)
meta(attr:'value2') (4)
}
}
1 | a new line is inserted because meta is not on the same line as head |
2 | no new line is inserted, because we’re on the same depth as the previous tag |
3 | we can force rendering of a new line by explicitly calling newLine |
4 | and this tag will be rendered on a separate line |
This time, the output will be:
<html>
<head>
<meta attr='value'/><title>Title</title>
<meta attr='value2'/>
</head>
</html>
By default, the renderer uses four(4) spaces as indent, but you can change it by setting the TemplateConfiguration#autoIndentString
property.
Automatic escaping
By default, contents which is read from the model is rendered as is. If this contents comes from user input, it can be sensible, and you might
want to escape it by default, for example to avoid XSS injection. For that, the template configuration provides an option which will automatically
escape objects from the model, as long as they inherit from CharSequence
(typically, `String`s).
Let’s imagine the following setup:
config.setAutoEscape(false);
model = new HashMap<String,Object>();
model.put("unsafeContents", "I am an <html> hacker.");
and the following template:
html {
body {
div(unsafeContents)
}
}
Then you wouldn’t want the HTML from unsafeContents
to be rendered as is, because of potential security issues:
<html><body><div>I am an <html> hacker.</div></body></html>
Automatic escaping will fix this:
config.setAutoEscape(true);
And now the output is properly escaped:
<html><body><div>I am an <html> hacker.</div></body></html>
Note that using automatic escaping doesn’t prevent you from including unescaped contents from the model. To do this, your template should then explicitly
mention that a model variable should not be escaped by prefixing it with unescaped.
, like in this example:
html {
body {
div(unescaped.unsafeContents)
}
}
Common gotchas
Say that you want to generate a <p>
tag which contains a string containing markup:
p {
yield "This is a "
a(href:'target.html', "link")
yield " to another page"
}
and generates:
<p>This is a <a href='target.html'>link</a> to another page</p>
Can’t this be written shorter? A naive alternative would be:
p {
yield "This is a ${a(href:'target.html', "link")} to another page"
}
but the result will not look as expected:
<p><a href='target.html'>link</a>This is a to another page</p>
The reason is that the markup template engine is a streaming engine. In the original version, the first yield
call
generates a string which is streamed to the output, then the a
link is generated and streamed, and then the last yield
call is streamed, leading in an execution in order. But with the string version above, the order of execution is different:
-
the
yield
call requires an argument, a string -
that arguments needs to be evaluated before the yield call is generated
so evaluating the string leads to an execution of the a(href:…)
call before yield
is itself called. This is not
what you want to do. Instead, you want to generate a string which contains markup, which is then passed to the yield
call. This can be done this way:
p("This is a ${stringOf {a(href:'target.html', "link")}} to another page")
Note the stringOf
call, which basically tells the markup template engine that the underlying markup needs to be rendered
separately and exported as a string. Note that for simple expressions, stringOf
can be replaced by an alternate tag
notation that starts with a dollar sign:
p("This is a ${$a(href:'target.html', "link")} to another page")
It is worth noting that using stringOf or the special $tag notation triggers the creation of a distinct string writer
which is then used to render the markup. It is slower than using the version with calls to yield which perform direct
streaming of the markup instead.
|
Internationalization
The template engine has native support for internationalization. For that, when you create the TemplateConfiguration
, you can provide
a Locale
which is the default locale to be used for templates. Each template may have different versions, one for each locale. The
name of the template makes the difference:
-
file.tpl
: default template file -
file_fr_FR.tpl
: french version of the template -
file_en_US.tpl
: american english version of the template -
…
When a template is rendered or included, then:
-
if the template name or include name explicitly sets a locale, the specific version is included, or the default version if not found
-
if the template name doesn’t include a locale, the version for the
TemplateConfiguration
locale is used, or the default version if not found
For example, imagine the default locale is set to Locale.ENGLISH
and that the main template includes:
include template: 'locale_include_fr_FR.tpl'
then the template is rendered using the specific template:
Texte en français
Using an include without specifying a locale will make the template engine look for a template with the configured locale, and if not, fallback to the default, like here:
include template: 'locale_include.tpl'
Default text
However, changing the default locale of the template engine to Locale.FRANCE
will change the output, because the template engine will now look for a file
with the fr_FR
locale:
Texte en français
This strategy lets you translate your templates one by one, by relying on default templates, for which no locale is set in the file name.
Custom template classes
By default, templates created inherit the groovy.text.markup.BaseTemplate
class. It may be interesting for an application to provide a different
template class, for example to provide additional helper methods which are aware of the application, or customized rendering primitives (for HTML,
for example).
The template engine provides this ability by setting an alternative baseTemplateClass
in the TemplateConfiguration
:
config.setBaseTemplateClass(MyTemplate.class);
The custom base class has to extend BaseClass
like in this example:
public abstract class MyTemplate extends BaseTemplate {
private List<Module> modules
public MyTemplate(
final MarkupTemplateEngine templateEngine,
final Map model,
final Map<String, String> modelTypes,
final TemplateConfiguration configuration) {
super(templateEngine, model, modelTypes, configuration)
}
List<Module> getModules() {
return modules
}
void setModules(final List<Module> modules) {
this.modules = modules
}
boolean hasModule(String name) {
modules?.any { it.name == name }
}
}
This example shows a class which provides an additional method named hasModule
, which can then be used directly in the template:
if (hasModule('foo')) {
p 'Found module [foo]'
} else {
p 'Module [foo] not found'
}
Type checked templates
Optional type checking
Even if templates are not type checked, they are statically compiled. This means that once the templates are compiled, performance should be very good. For some applications, it might be good to make sure that templates are valid before they are actually rendered. This means failing template compilation, for example, if a method on a model variable doesn’t exist.
The MarkupTemplateEngine
provides such a facility. Templates can be optionally type checked. For that, the developer must provide additional information at
template creation time, which is the types of the variables found in the model. Imagine a model exposing a list of pages, where a page is defined as:
public class Page {
Long id
String title
String body
}
Then a list of pages can be exposed in the model, like this:
Page p = new Page();
p.setTitle("Sample page");
p.setBody("Page body");
List<Page> pages = new LinkedList<>();
pages.add(p);
model = new HashMap<String,Object>();
model.put("pages", pages);
A template can use it easily:
pages.each { page -> (1)
p("Page title: $page.title") (2)
p(page.text) (3)
}
1 | iterate on pages from the model |
2 | page.title is valid |
3 | page.text is not (should be page.body ) |
Without type checking, the compilation of the template succeeds, because the template engine doesn’t know about the model until a page is actually rendered. This means that the problem would only surface at runtime, once the page is rendered:
No such property: text
In some situations, this can be complicated to sort out or even notice. By declaring the type of the pages
to the template engine, we’re now capable of failing at compile time:
modelTypes = new HashMap<String,String>(); (1)
modelTypes.put("pages", "List<Page>"); (2)
Template template = engine.createTypeCheckedModelTemplate("main.tpl", modelTypes) (3)
1 | create a map which will hold the model types |
2 | declare the type of the pages variables (note the use of a string for the type) |
3 | use createTypeCheckedModelTemplate instead of createTemplate |
This time, when the template is compiled at the last line, an error occurs:
[Static type checking] - No such property: text for class: Page
This means that you don’t need to wait for the page to be rendered to see an error. The use of createTypeCheckedModelTemplate
is mandatory.
Alternative declaration of types
Alternatively, if the developer is also the one who writes the templates, it is possible to declare the types of the expected variables
directly in the template. In this case, even if you call createTemplate
, it will be type checked:
modelTypes = { (1)
List<Page> pages (2)
}
pages.each { page ->
p("Page title: $page.title")
p(page.text)
}
1 | types need to be declared in the modelTypes header |
2 | declare one variable per object in the model |
Performance of type checked templates
An additional interest of using type checked models is that performance should improve. By telling the type checker what are the expected types, you also let the compiler generate optimized code for that, so if you are looking for the best performance, consider using type checked templates.
3.12.8. Other solutions
Also, there are other templating solutions that can be used along with Groovy, such as FreeMarker, Velocity, StringTemplate and others.
3.13. Servlet support
You can write (Java) Servlets in Groovy (called Groovlets).
There is also a GroovyServlet
.
This feature will automatically compile your .groovy source files, turn them into bytecode, load the Class and cache it until you change the source file.
Here’s a simple example to show you the kind of things you can do from a Groovlet.
Notice the use of implicit variables to access the session, output and request. Also notice that this is more like a script as it does not have a class wrapper.
if (!session) {
session = request.getSession(true)
}
if (!session.counter) {
session.counter = 1
}
println """
<html>
<head>
<title>Groovy Servlet</title>
</head>
<body>
<p>
Hello, ${request.remoteHost}: ${session.counter}! ${new Date()}
</p>
</body>
</html>
"""
session.counter = session.counter + 1
Or, do the same thing using MarkupBuilder:
if (!session) {
session = request.getSession(true)
}
if (!session.counter) {
session.counter = 1
}
html.html { // html is implicitly bound to new MarkupBuilder(out)
head {
title('Groovy Servlet')
}
body {
p("Hello, ${request.remoteHost}: ${session.counter}! ${new Date()}")
}
}
session.counter = session.counter + 1
3.13.1. Implicit variables
The following variables are ready for use in Groovlets:
variable name | bound to | note |
---|---|---|
request |
ServletRequest |
- |
response |
ServletResponse |
- |
context |
ServletContext |
- |
application |
ServletContext |
- |
session |
getSession(false) |
can be null! see <1> |
params |
a Map object |
|
headers |
a Map object |
|
out |
response.getWriter() |
see <2> |
sout |
response.getOutputStream() |
see <2> |
html |
new MarkupBuilder(out) |
see <2> |
json |
new StreamingJsonBuilder(out) |
see <2> |
-
The session variable is only set, if there was already a session object. See the
if (session == null)
checks in the examples above. -
These variables cannot be re-assigned inside a
Groovlet
. They are bound on first access, allowing to e.g. calling methods on theresponse
object before usingout
.
3.13.2. Setting up groovylets
Add the following to your web.xml
:
<servlet>
<servlet-name>Groovy</servlet-name>
<servlet-class>groovy.servlet.GroovyServlet</servlet-class>
</servlet>
<servlet-mapping>
<servlet-name>Groovy</servlet-name>
<url-pattern>*.groovy</url-pattern>
</servlet-mapping>
Then put the required groovy jar files into WEB-INF/lib
.
Now put the .groovy files in, say, the root directory (i.e. where you would put your html files). The GroovyServlet
takes care of compiling the .groovy files.
So for example using tomcat you could edit tomcat/conf/server.xml
like this:
<Context path="/groovy" docBase="c:/groovy-servlet"/>
Then access it with http://localhost:8080/groovy/hello.groovy
3.14. Integrating Groovy in a Java application
3.14.1. Groovy integration mechanisms
The Groovy language proposes several ways to integrate itself into applications (Java or even Groovy) at runtime, from the most basic, simple code execution to the most complete, integrating caching and compiler customization.
All the examples written in this section are using Groovy, but the same integration mechanisms can be used from Java. |
Eval
The groovy.util.Eval
class is the simplest way to execute Groovy dynamically at runtime. This can be done by calling the me
method:
import groovy.util.Eval
assert Eval.me('33*3') == 99
assert Eval.me('"foo".toUpperCase()') == 'FOO'
Eval
supports multiple variants that accept parameters for simple evaluation:
assert Eval.x(4, '2*x') == 8 (1)
assert Eval.me('k', 4, '2*k') == 8 (2)
assert Eval.xy(4, 5, 'x*y') == 20 (3)
assert Eval.xyz(4, 5, 6, 'x*y+z') == 26 (4)
1 | Simple evaluation with one bound parameter named x |
2 | Same evaluation, with a custom bound parameter named k |
3 | Simple evaluation with two bound parameters named x and y |
4 | Simple evaluation with three bound parameters named x , y and z |
The Eval
class makes it very easy to evaluate simple scripts, but doesn’t scale: there is no caching of the script, and
it isn’t meant to evaluate more than one liners.
GroovyShell
Multiple sources
The groovy.lang.GroovyShell
class is the preferred way to evaluate scripts with the ability to cache the resulting
script instance. Although the Eval
class returns the result of the execution of the compiled script, the GroovyShell
class offers more options.
def shell = new GroovyShell() (1)
def result = shell.evaluate '3*5' (2)
def result2 = shell.evaluate(new StringReader('3*5')) (3)
assert result == result2
def script = shell.parse '3*5' (4)
assert script instanceof groovy.lang.Script
assert script.run() == 15 (5)
1 | create a new GroovyShell instance |
2 | can be used as Eval with direct execution of the code |
3 | can read from multiple sources (String , Reader , File , InputStream ) |
4 | can defer execution of the script. parse returns a Script instance |
5 | Script defines a run method |
Sharing data between a script and the application
It is possible to share data between the application and the script using a groovy.lang.Binding
:
def sharedData = new Binding() (1)
def shell = new GroovyShell(sharedData) (2)
def now = new Date()
sharedData.setProperty('text', 'I am shared data!') (3)
sharedData.setProperty('date', now) (4)
String result = shell.evaluate('"At $date, $text"') (5)
assert result == "At $now, I am shared data!"
1 | create a new Binding that will contain shared data |
2 | create a GroovyShell using this shared data |
3 | add a string to the binding |
4 | add a date to the binding (you are not limited to simple types) |
5 | evaluate the script |
Note that it is also possible to write from the script into the binding:
def sharedData = new Binding() (1)
def shell = new GroovyShell(sharedData) (2)
shell.evaluate('foo=123') (3)
assert sharedData.getProperty('foo') == 123 (4)
1 | create a new Binding instance |
2 | create a new GroovyShell using that shared data |
3 | use an undeclared variable to store the result into the binding |
4 | read the result from the caller |
It is important to understand that you need to use an undeclared variable if you want to write into the binding. Using
def
or an explicit
type like in the example below would fail because you would then create a local variable:
def sharedData = new Binding()
def shell = new GroovyShell(sharedData)
shell.evaluate('int foo=123')
try {
assert sharedData.getProperty('foo')
} catch (MissingPropertyException e) {
println "foo is defined as a local variable"
}
You must be very careful when using shared data in a multithreaded environment. The Binding instance that
you pass to GroovyShell is not thread safe, and shared by all scripts.
|
It is possible to work around the shared instance of Binding
by leveraging the Script
instance which is returned
by parse
:
def shell = new GroovyShell()
def b1 = new Binding(x:3) (1)
def b2 = new Binding(x:4) (2)
def script = shell.parse('x = 2*x')
script.binding = b1
script.run()
script.binding = b2
script.run()
assert b1.getProperty('x') == 6
assert b2.getProperty('x') == 8
assert b1 != b2
1 | will store the x variable inside b1 |
2 | will store the x variable inside b2 |
However, you must be aware that you are still sharing the same instance of a script. So this technique cannot be used if you have two threads working on the same script. In that case, you must make sure of creating two distinct script instances:
def shell = new GroovyShell()
def b1 = new Binding(x:3)
def b2 = new Binding(x:4)
def script1 = shell.parse('x = 2*x') (1)
def script2 = shell.parse('x = 2*x') (2)
assert script1 != script2
script1.binding = b1 (3)
script2.binding = b2 (4)
def t1 = Thread.start { script1.run() } (5)
def t2 = Thread.start { script2.run() } (6)
[t1,t2]*.join() (7)
assert b1.getProperty('x') == 6
assert b2.getProperty('x') == 8
assert b1 != b2
1 | create an instance of script for thread 1 |
2 | create an instance of script for thread 2 |
3 | assign first binding to script 1 |
4 | assign second binding to script 2 |
5 | start first script in a separate thread |
6 | start second script in a separate thread |
7 | wait for completion |
In case you need thread safety like here, it is more advisable to use the GroovyClassLoader directly instead.
Custom script class
We have seen that the parse
method returns an instance of groovy.lang.Script
, but it is possible to use a custom
class, given that it extends Script
itself. It can be used to provide additional behavior to the script like in
the example below:
abstract class MyScript extends Script {
String name
String greet() {
"Hello, $name!"
}
}
The custom class defines a property called name
and a new method called greet
. This class can be used as the script
base class by using a custom configuration:
import org.codehaus.groovy.control.CompilerConfiguration
def config = new CompilerConfiguration() (1)
config.scriptBaseClass = 'MyScript' (2)
def shell = new GroovyShell(this.class.classLoader, new Binding(), config) (3)
def script = shell.parse('greet()') (4)
assert script instanceof MyScript
script.setName('Michel')
assert script.run() == 'Hello, Michel!'
1 | create a CompilerConfiguration instance |
2 | instruct it to use MyScript as the base class for scripts |
3 | then use the compiler configuration when you create the shell |
4 | the script now has access to the new method greet |
You are not limited to the sole scriptBaseClass configuration. You can use any of the compiler configuration tweaks, including the compilation customizers. |
GroovyClassLoader
In the previous section, we have shown that GroovyShell
was an easy tool to execute scripts, but
it makes it complicated to compile anything but scripts. Internally, it makes use of the groovy.lang.GroovyClassLoader
,
which is at the heart of the compilation and loading of classes at runtime.
By leveraging the GroovyClassLoader
instead of GroovyShell
, you will be able to load classes, instead of instances
of scripts:
import groovy.lang.GroovyClassLoader
def gcl = new GroovyClassLoader() (1)
def clazz = gcl.parseClass('class Foo { void doIt() { println "ok" } }') (2)
assert clazz.name == 'Foo' (3)
def o = clazz.newInstance() (4)
o.doIt() (5)
1 | create a new GroovyClassLoader |
2 | parseClass will return an instance of Class |
3 | you can check that the class which is returns is really the one defined in the script |
4 | and you can create a new instance of the class, which is not a script |
5 | then call any method on it |
A GroovyClassLoader keeps a reference of all the classes it created, so it is easy to create a memory leak. In particular, if you execute the same script twice, if it is a String, then you obtain two distinct classes! |
import groovy.lang.GroovyClassLoader
def gcl = new GroovyClassLoader()
def clazz1 = gcl.parseClass('class Foo { }') (1)
def clazz2 = gcl.parseClass('class Foo { }') (2)
assert clazz1.name == 'Foo' (3)
assert clazz2.name == 'Foo'
assert clazz1 != clazz2 (4)
1 | dynamically create a class named "Foo" |
2 | create an identical looking class, using a separate parseClass call |
3 | make sure both classes have the same name |
4 | but they are actually different! |
The reason is that a GroovyClassLoader
doesn’t keep track of the source text. If you want to have the same instance,
then the source must be a file, like in this example:
def gcl = new GroovyClassLoader()
def clazz1 = gcl.parseClass(file) (1)
def clazz2 = gcl.parseClass(new File(file.absolutePath)) (2)
assert clazz1.name == 'Foo' (3)
assert clazz2.name == 'Foo'
assert clazz1 == clazz2 (4)
1 | parse a class from a File |
2 | parse a class from a distinct file instance, but pointing to the same physical file |
3 | make sure our classes have the same name |
4 | but now, they are the same instance |
Using a File
as input, the GroovyClassLoader
is capable of caching the generated class file, which avoids
creating multiple classes at runtime for the same source.
GroovyScriptEngine
The groovy.util.GroovyScriptEngine
class provides a flexible foundation for applications which rely on script
reloading and script dependencies. While GroovyShell
focuses on standalone Script`s and `GroovyClassLoader
handles
dynamic compilation and loading of any Groovy class, the GroovyScriptEngine
will add a layer on top of GroovyClassLoader
to handle both script dependencies and reloading.
To illustrate this, we will create a script engine and execute code in an infinite loop. First of all, you need to create a directory with the following script inside:
class Greeter {
String sayHello() {
def greet = "Hello, world!"
greet
}
}
new Greeter()
then you can execute this code using a GroovyScriptEngine
:
def binding = new Binding()
def engine = new GroovyScriptEngine([tmpDir.toURI().toURL()] as URL[]) (1)
while (true) {
def greeter = engine.run('ReloadingTest.groovy', binding) (2)
println greeter.sayHello() (3)
Thread.sleep(1000)
}
1 | create a script engine which will look for sources into our source directory |
2 | execute the script, which will return an instance of Greeter |
3 | print the greeting message |
At this point, you should see a message printed every second:
Hello, world! Hello, world! ...
Without interrupting the script execution, now replace the contents of the ReloadingTest
file with:
class Greeter {
String sayHello() {
def greet = "Hello, Groovy!"
greet
}
}
new Greeter()
And the message should change to:
Hello, world! ... Hello, Groovy! Hello, Groovy! ...
But it is also possible to have a dependency on another script. To illustrate this, create the following file into the same directory, without interrupting the executing script:
class Dependency {
String message = 'Hello, dependency 1'
}
and update the ReloadingTest
script like this:
import Dependency
class Greeter {
String sayHello() {
def greet = new Dependency().message
greet
}
}
new Greeter()
And this time, the message should change to:
Hello, Groovy! ... Hello, dependency 1! Hello, dependency 1! ...
And as a last test, you can update the Dependency.groovy
file without touching the ReloadingTest
file:
class Dependency {
String message = 'Hello, dependency 2'
}
And you should observe that the dependent file was reloaded:
Hello, dependency 1! ... Hello, dependency 2! Hello, dependency 2!
CompilationUnit
Ultimately, it is possible to perform more operations during compilation by relying directly on the
org.codehaus.groovy.control.CompilationUnit
class. This class is responsible for determining the various steps of
compilation and would let you introduce new steps or even stop compilation at various phases. This is for example how
stub generation is done, for the joint compiler.
However, overriding CompilationUnit
is not recommended and should only be done if no other standard solution works.
3.14.2. Bean Scripting Framework
The Bean Scripting Framework is an attempt to create an API to allow calling scripting languages from Java. It hasn’t been updated for long and abandoned in favor of the standard JSR-223 API. |
The BSF engine for Groovy is implemented by the org.codehaus.groovy.bsf.GroovyEngine
class. However, that fact is
normally hidden away by the BSF APIs. You just treat Groovy like any of the other scripting languages via the BSF
API.
Since Groovy has its own native support for integration with Java, you only need to worry about BSF if you also want to also be able to call other languages, e.g. JRuby or if you want to remain very loosely coupled from your scripting language. |
Getting started
Provided you have Groovy and BSF jars in your classpath, you can use the following Java code to run a sample Groovy script:
String myScript = "println('Hello World')\n return [1, 2, 3]";
BSFManager manager = new BSFManager();
List answer = (List) manager.eval("groovy", "myScript.groovy", 0, 0, myScript);
assertEquals(3, answer.size());
Passing in variables
BSF lets you pass beans between Java and your scripting language. You can register/unregister beans which makes them known to BSF. You can then use BSF methods to lookup beans as required. Alternatively, you can declare/undeclare beans. This will register them but also make them available for use directly in your scripting language. This second approach is the normal approach used with Groovy. Here is an example:
BSFManager manager = new BSFManager();
manager.declareBean("xyz", 4, Integer.class);
Object answer = manager.eval("groovy", "test.groovy", 0, 0, "xyz + 1");
assertEquals(5, answer);
Other calling options
The previous examples used the eval method. BSF makes multiple methods available for your use (see the BSF documentation for more details). One of the other available methods is apply. It allows you to define an anonymous function in your scripting language and apply that function to arguments. Groovy supports this function using closures. Here is an example:
BSFManager manager = new BSFManager();
Vector<String> ignoreParamNames = null;
Vector<Integer> args = new Vector<>();
args.add(2);
args.add(5);
args.add(1);
Integer actual = (Integer) manager.apply("groovy", "applyTest", 0, 0,
"def summer = { a, b, c -> a * 100 + b * 10 + c }", ignoreParamNames, args);
assertEquals(251, actual.intValue());
Access to the scripting engine
Although you don’t normally need it, BSF does provide a hook that lets you get directly to the scripting engine. One of the functions which the engine can perform is to invoke a single method call on an object. Here is an example:
BSFManager manager = new BSFManager();
BSFEngine bsfEngine = manager.loadScriptingEngine("groovy");
manager.declareBean("myvar", "hello", String.class);
Object myvar = manager.lookupBean("myvar");
String result = (String) bsfEngine.call(myvar, "reverse", new Object[0]);
assertEquals("olleh", result);
3.14.3. JSR 223 javax.script API
JSR-223 is a standard API for calling scripting frameworks in Java. It is available since Java 6 and aims at providing a common framework for calling multiple languages from Java. Groovy provides its own richer integration mechanisms, and if you don’t plan to use multiple languages in the same application, it is recommended that you use the Groovy integration mechanisms instead of the limited JSR-223 API. |
Here is how you need to initialize the JSR-223 engine to talk to Groovy from Java:
import javax.script.ScriptEngine;
import javax.script.ScriptEngineManager;
import javax.script.ScriptException;
...
ScriptEngineManager factory = new ScriptEngineManager();
ScriptEngine engine = factory.getEngineByName("groovy");
Then you can execute Groovy scripts easily:
Integer sum = (Integer) engine.eval("(1..10).sum()");
assertEquals(new Integer(55), sum);
It is also possible to share variables:
engine.put("first", "HELLO");
engine.put("second", "world");
String result = (String) engine.eval("first.toLowerCase() + ' ' + second.toUpperCase()");
assertEquals("hello WORLD", result);
This next example illustrates calling an invokable function:
import javax.script.Invocable;
...
ScriptEngineManager factory = new ScriptEngineManager();
ScriptEngine engine = factory.getEngineByName("groovy");
String fact = "def factorial(n) { n == 1 ? 1 : n * factorial(n - 1) }";
engine.eval(fact);
Invocable inv = (Invocable) engine;
Object[] params = {5};
Object result = inv.invokeFunction("factorial", params);
assertEquals(new Integer(120), result);
The engine keeps per default hard references to the script functions. To
change this you should set a engine level scoped attribute to the script
context of the name #jsr223.groovy.engine.keep.globals
with a
String being phantom
to use phantom references, weak
to use weak
references or soft
to use soft references - casing is ignored. Any
other string will cause the use of hard references.
3.15. Domain-Specific Languages
3.15.1. Command chains
Groovy lets you omit parentheses around the arguments of a
method call for top-level statements. "command chain" feature extends this by allowing us to chain such
parentheses-free method calls, requiring neither parentheses around arguments, nor dots between the chained calls.
The general idea is that a call like a b c d
will actually be equivalent to a(b).c(d)
. This
also works with multiple arguments, closure arguments, and even named arguments. Furthermore, such command chains can
also appear on the right-hand side of assignments. Let’s have a look at some examples
supported by this new syntax:
// equivalent to: turn(left).then(right)
turn left then right
// equivalent to: take(2.pills).of(chloroquinine).after(6.hours)
take 2.pills of chloroquinine after 6.hours
// equivalent to: paint(wall).with(red, green).and(yellow)
paint wall with red, green and yellow
// with named parameters too
// equivalent to: check(that: margarita).tastes(good)
check that: margarita tastes good
// with closures as parameters
// equivalent to: given({}).when({}).then({})
given { } when { } then { }
It is also possible to use methods in the chain which take no arguments, but in that case, the parentheses are needed:
// equivalent to: select(all).unique().from(names)
select all unique() from names
If your command chain contains an odd number of elements, the chain will be composed of method / arguments, and will finish by a final property access:
// equivalent to: take(3).cookies
// and also this: take(3).getCookies()
take 3 cookies
This command chain approach opens up interesting possibilities in terms of the much wider range of DSLs which can now be written in Groovy.
The above examples illustrate using a command chain based DSL but not how to create one. There are various strategies that you can use, but to illustrate creating such a DSL, we will show a couple of examples - first using maps and Closures:
show = { println it }
square_root = { Math.sqrt(it) }
def please(action) {
[the: { what ->
[of: { n -> action(what(n)) }]
}]
}
// equivalent to: please(show).the(square_root).of(100)
please show the square_root of 100
// ==> 10.0
As a second example, consider how you might write a DSL for simplifying
one of your existing APIs. Maybe you need to put this code in front of
customers, business analysts or testers who might be not hard-core Java
developers. We’ll use the Splitter
from the Google
Guava libraries project as it
already has a nice Fluent API. Here is how we might use it out of the
box:
@Grab('com.google.guava:guava:r09')
import com.google.common.base.*
def result = Splitter.on(',').trimResults(CharMatcher.is('_' as char)).split("_a ,_b_ ,c__").iterator().toList()
It reads fairly well for a Java developer but if that is not your target audience or you have many such statements to write, it could be considered a little verbose. Again, there are many options for writing a DSL. We’ll keep it simple with Maps and Closures. We’ll first write a helper method:
@Grab('com.google.guava:guava:r09')
import com.google.common.base.*
def split(string) {
[on: { sep ->
[trimming: { trimChar ->
Splitter.on(sep).trimResults(CharMatcher.is(trimChar as char)).split(string).iterator().toList()
}]
}]
}
now instead of this line from our original example:
def result = Splitter.on(',').trimResults(CharMatcher.is('_' as char)).split("_a ,_b_ ,c__").iterator().toList()
we can write this:
def result = split "_a ,_b_ ,c__" on ',' trimming '_\'
3.15.2. Operator overloading
Various operators in Groovy are mapped onto regular method calls on objects.
This allows you to provide your own Java or Groovy objects which can take advantage of operator overloading. The following table describes the operators supported in Groovy and the methods they map to.
Operator | Method |
---|---|
|
a.plus(b) |
|
a.minus(b) |
|
a.multiply(b) |
|
a.power(b) |
|
a.div(b) |
|
a.mod(b) |
|
a.or(b) |
|
a.and(b) |
|
a.xor(b) |
|
a.next() |
|
a.previous() |
|
a.getAt(b) |
|
a.putAt(b, c) |
|
a.leftShift(b) |
|
a.rightShift(b) |
|
a.rightShiftUnsigned(b) |
|
b.isCase(a) |
|
a.asBoolean() |
|
a.bitwiseNegate() |
|
a.negative() |
|
a.positive() |
|
a.asType(b) |
|
a.equals(b) |
|
! a.equals(b) |
|
a.compareTo(b) |
|
a.compareTo(b) > 0 |
|
a.compareTo(b) >= 0 |
|
a.compareTo(b) < 0 |
|
a.compareTo(b) <= 0 |
3.15.3. Script base classes
The Script class
Groovy scripts are always compiled to classes. For example, a script as simple as:
println 'Hello from Groovy'
is compiled to a class extending the abstract groovy.lang.Script class. This class contains a single abstract
method called run. When a script is compiled, then its body will become the run method, while the other methods
found in the script are found in the implementing class. The Script
class provides base support for integration
with your application through the Binding
object, as illustrated in this example:
def binding = new Binding() (1)
def shell = new GroovyShell(binding) (2)
binding.setVariable('x',1) (3)
binding.setVariable('y',3)
shell.evaluate 'z=2*x+y' (4)
assert binding.getVariable('z') == 5 (5)
1 | a binding is used to share data between the script and the calling class |
2 | a GroovyShell can be used with this binding |
3 | input variables are set from the calling class inside the binding |
4 | then the script is evaluated |
5 | and the z variable has been "exported" into the binding |
This is a very practical way to share data between the caller and the script, however it may be insufficient or not practical in some cases. For that purpose, Groovy allows you to set your own base script class. A base script class has to extend groovy.lang.Script and be a single abstract method type:
abstract class MyBaseClass extends Script {
String name
public void greet() { println "Hello, $name!" }
}
Then the custom script base class can be declared in the compiler configuration, for example:
def config = new CompilerConfiguration() (1)
config.scriptBaseClass = 'MyBaseClass' (2)
def shell = new GroovyShell(this.class.classLoader, config) (3)
shell.evaluate """
setName 'Judith' (4)
greet()
"""
1 | create a custom compiler configuration |
2 | set the base script class to our custom base script class |
3 | then create a GroovyShell using that configuration |
4 | the script will then extend the base script class, giving direct access to the name property and greet method |
The @BaseScript annotation
As an alternative, it is also possible to use the @BaseScript
annotation directly into a script:
import groovy.transform.BaseScript
@BaseScript MyBaseClass baseScript
setName 'Judith'
greet()
where @BaseScript
should annotate a variable which type is the class of the base script. Alternatively, you can set
the base script class as a member of the @BaseScript
annotation itself:
@BaseScript(MyBaseClass)
import groovy.transform.BaseScript
setName 'Judith'
greet()
Alternate abstract method
We have seen that the base script class is a single abstract method type that needs to implement the run
method. The
run
method is executed by the script engine automatically. In some circumstances it may be interesting to have a base
class which implements the run
method, but provides an alternative abstract method to be used for the script body.
For example, the base script run
method might perform some initialization before the run
method is executed. This
is possible by doing this:
abstract class MyBaseClass extends Script {
int count
abstract void scriptBody() (1)
def run() {
count++ (2)
scriptBody() (3)
count (4)
}
}
1 | the base script class should define one (and only one) abstract method |
2 | the run method can be overridden and perform a task before executing the script body |
3 | run calls the abstract scriptBody method which will delegate to the user script |
4 | then it can return something else than the value from the script |
If you execute this code:
def result = shell.evaluate """
println 'Ok'
"""
assert result == 1
Then you will see that the script is executed, but the result of the evaluation is 1
as returned by the run
method of the base class. It is even clearer if you use parse
instead of evaluate
, because it would allow you to
execute the run
method several times on the same script instance:
def script = shell.parse("println 'Ok'")
assert script.run() == 1
assert script.run() == 2
3.15.4. Adding properties to numbers
In Groovy number types are considered equal to any other types. As such, it is possible to enhance numbers by adding properties or methods to them. This can be very handy when dealing with measurable quantities for example. Details about how existing classes can be enhanced in Groovy are found in the extension modules section or the categories section.
An illustration of this can be found in Groovy using the TimeCategory
:
use(TimeCategory) {
println 1.minute.from.now (1)
println 10.hours.ago
def someDate = new Date() (2)
println someDate - 3.months
}
1 | using the TimeCategory , a property minute is added to the Integer class |
2 | similarily, the months method returns a groovy.time.DatumDependentDuration which can be used in calculus |
Categories are lexically bound, making them a great fit for internal DSLs.
3.15.5. @DelegatesTo
Explaining delegation strategy at compile time
@groovy.lang.DelegatesTo
is a documentation and compile-time annotation aimed at:
-
documenting APIs that use closures as arguments
-
providing type information for the static type checker and compiler
The Groovy language is a platform of choice for building DSLs. Using closures, it’s quite easy to create custom control structures, as well as it is simple to create builders. Imagine that you have the following code:
email {
from 'dsl-guru@mycompany.com'
to 'john.doe@waitaminute.com'
subject 'The pope has resigned!'
body {
p 'Really, the pope has resigned!'
}
}
One way of implementing this is using the builder strategy, which
implies a method, named email
which accepts a closure as an argument.
The method may delegate subsequent calls to an object that implements
the from
, to
, subject
and body
methods. Again, body
is a
method which accepts a closure as an argument and that uses the builder
strategy.
Implementing such a builder is usually done the following way:
def email(Closure cl) {
def email = new EmailSpec()
def code = cl.rehydrate(email, this, this)
code.resolveStrategy = Closure.DELEGATE_ONLY
code()
}
the EmailSpec
class implements the from
, to
, … methods. By
calling rehydrate
, we’re creating a copy of the closure for which we
set the delegate
, owner
and thisObject
values. Setting the owner
and the this
object is not very important here since we will use the
DELEGATE_ONLY
strategy which says that the method calls will be
resolved only against the delegate of the closure.
class EmailSpec {
void from(String from) { println "From: $from"}
void to(String... to) { println "To: $to"}
void subject(String subject) { println "Subject: $subject"}
void body(Closure body) {
def bodySpec = new BodySpec()
def code = body.rehydrate(bodySpec, this, this)
code.resolveStrategy = Closure.DELEGATE_ONLY
code()
}
}
The EmailSpec
class has itself a body
method accepting a closure that is cloned and executed. This is what
we call the builder pattern in Groovy.
One of the problems with the code that we’ve shown is that the user of
the email
method doesn’t have any information about the methods that
he’s allowed to call inside the closure. The only possible information
is from the method documentation. There are two issues with this: first
of all, documentation is not always written, and if it is, it’s not
always available (javadoc not downloaded, for example). Second, it
doesn’t help IDEs. What would be really interesting, here, is for IDEs
to help the developer by suggesting, once they are in the closure body,
methods that exist on the email
class.
Moreover, if the user calls a method in the closure which is not defined
by the EmailSpec
class, the IDE should at least issue a warning (because
it’s very likely that it will break at runtime).
One more problem with the code above is that it is not compatible with static type checking. Type checking would let the user know if a method call is authorized at compile time instead of runtime, but if you try to perform type checking on this code:
email {
from 'dsl-guru@mycompany.com'
to 'john.doe@waitaminute.com'
subject 'The pope has resigned!'
body {
p 'Really, the pope has resigned!'
}
}
Then the type checker will know that there’s an email
method accepting
a Closure
, but it will complain for every method call inside the
closure, because from
, for example, is not a method which is defined
in the class. Indeed, it’s defined in the EmailSpec
class and it has
absolutely no hint to help it knowing that the closure delegate will, at
runtime, be of type EmailSpec
:
@groovy.transform.TypeChecked
void sendEmail() {
email {
from 'dsl-guru@mycompany.com'
to 'john.doe@waitaminute.com'
subject 'The pope has resigned!'
body {
p 'Really, the pope has resigned!'
}
}
}
will fail compilation with errors like this one:
[Static type checking] - Cannot find matching method MyScript#from(java.lang.String). Please check if the declared type is correct and if the method exists. @ line 31, column 21. from 'dsl-guru@mycompany.com'
@DelegatesTo
For those reasons, Groovy 2.1 introduced a new annotation
named @DelegatesTo
. The goal of this annotation is to solve both the
documentation issue, that will let your IDE know about the expected
methods in the closure body, and it will also solve the type checking
issue, by giving hints to the compiler about what are the potential
receivers of method calls in the closure body.
The idea is to annotate the Closure
parameter of the email
method:
def email(@DelegatesTo(EmailSpec) Closure cl) {
def email = new EmailSpec()
def code = cl.rehydrate(email, this, this)
code.resolveStrategy = Closure.DELEGATE_ONLY
code()
}
What we’ve done here is telling the compiler (or the IDE) that when the
method will be called with a closure, the delegate of this closure will
be set to an object of type email
. But there is still a problem: the
default delegation strategy is not the one which is used in our method.
So we will give more information and tell the compiler (or the IDE) that
the delegation strategy is also changed:
def email(@DelegatesTo(strategy=Closure.DELEGATE_ONLY, value=EmailSpec) Closure cl) {
def email = new EmailSpec()
def code = cl.rehydrate(email, this, this)
code.resolveStrategy = Closure.DELEGATE_ONLY
code()
}
Now, both the IDE and the type checker (if you are using @TypeChecked
)
will be aware of the delegate and the delegation strategy. This is very
nice because it will both allow the IDE to provide smart completion, but
it will also remove errors at compile time that exist only because the
behaviour of the program is normally only known at runtime!
The following code will now pass compilation:
@TypeChecked
void doEmail() {
email {
from 'dsl-guru@mycompany.com'
to 'john.doe@waitaminute.com'
subject 'The pope has resigned!'
body {
p 'Really, the pope has resigned!'
}
}
}
DelegatesTo modes
@DelegatesTo
supports multiple modes that we will describe with examples
in this section.
Simple delegation
In this mode, the only mandatory parameter is the value which says to
which class we delegate calls. Nothing more. We’re telling the compiler
that the type of the delegate will always be of the type documented
by @DelegatesTo
(note that it can be a subclass, but if it is, the
methods defined by the subclass will not be visible to the type
checker).
void body(@DelegatesTo(BodySpec) Closure cl) {
// ...
}
Delegation strategy
In this mode, you must specify both the delegate class and a
delegation strategy. This must be used if the closure will not be called
with the default delegation strategy, which is Closure.OWNER_FIRST
.
void body(@DelegatesTo(strategy=Closure.DELEGATE_ONLY, value=BodySpec) Closure cl) {
// ...
}
Delegate to parameter
In this variant, we will tell the compiler that we are delegating to another parameter of the method. Take the following code:
def exec(Object target, Closure code) {
def clone = code.rehydrate(target, this, this)
clone()
}
Here, the delegate which will be used is not created inside the exec
method. In fact, we take an argument of the method and delegate to it.
Usage may look like this:
def email = new Email()
exec(email) {
from '...'
to '...'
send()
}
Each of the method calls are delegated to the email
parameter. This is
a widely used pattern which is also supported by @DelegatesTo
using a
companion annotation:
def exec(@DelegatesTo.Target Object target, @DelegatesTo Closure code) {
def clone = code.rehydrate(target, this, this)
clone()
}
A closure is annotated with @DelegatesTo
, but this time, without
specifying any class. Instead, we’re annotating another parameter
with @DelegatesTo.Target
. The type of the delegate is then determined
at compile time. One could think that we are using the parameter type,
which in this case is Object
but this is not true. Take this code:
class Greeter {
void sayHello() { println 'Hello' }
}
def greeter = new Greeter()
exec(greeter) {
sayHello()
}
Remember that this works out of the box without having to annotate
with @DelegatesTo
. However, to make the IDE aware of the delegate
type, or the type checker aware of it, we need to add @DelegatesTo
.
And in this case, it will know that the Greeter
variable is of
type Greeter
, so it will not report errors on the sayHello
method even if the exec method doesn’t explicitly define the target as
of type Greeter. This is a very powerful feature, because it prevents
you from writing multiple versions of the same exec
method for
different receiver types!
In this mode, the @DelegatesTo
annotation also supports the strategy
parameter that we’ve described upper.
Multiple closures
In the previous example, the exec
method accepted only one closure,
but you may have methods that take multiple closures:
void fooBarBaz(Closure foo, Closure bar, Closure baz) {
...
}
Then nothing prevents you from annotating each closure
with @DelegatesTo
:
class Foo { void foo(String msg) { println "Foo ${msg}!" } }
class Bar { void bar(int x) { println "Bar ${x}!" } }
class Baz { void baz(Date d) { println "Baz ${d}!" } }
void fooBarBaz(@DelegatesTo(Foo) Closure foo, @DelegatesTo(Bar) Closure bar, @DelegatesTo(Baz) Closure baz) {
...
}
But more importantly, if you have multiple closures and multiple arguments, you can use several targets:
void fooBarBaz(
@DelegatesTo.Target('foo') foo,
@DelegatesTo.Target('bar') bar,
@DelegatesTo.Target('baz') baz,
@DelegatesTo(target='foo') Closure cl1,
@DelegatesTo(target='bar') Closure cl2,
@DelegatesTo(target='baz') Closure cl3) {
cl1.rehydrate(foo, this, this).call()
cl2.rehydrate(bar, this, this).call()
cl3.rehydrate(baz, this, this).call()
}
def a = new Foo()
def b = new Bar()
def c = new Baz()
fooBarBaz(
a, b, c,
{ foo('Hello') },
{ bar(123) },
{ baz(new Date()) }
)
At this point, you may wonder why we don’t use the parameter names as references. The reason is that the information (the parameter name) is not always available (it’s a debug-only information), so it’s a limitation of the JVM. |
Delegating to a generic type
In some situations, it is interesting to instruct the IDE or the compiler that the delegate type will not be a parameter but a generic type. Imagine a configurator that runs on a list of elements:
public <T> void configure(List<T> elements, Closure configuration) {
elements.each { e->
def clone = configuration.rehydrate(e, this, this)
clone.resolveStrategy = Closure.DELEGATE_FIRST
clone.call()
}
}
Then this method can be called with any list like this:
@groovy.transform.ToString
class Realm {
String name
}
List<Realm> list = []
3.times { list << new Realm() }
configure(list) {
name = 'My Realm'
}
assert list.every { it.name == 'My Realm' }
To let the type checker and the IDE know that the configure
method calls the closure on each element of the list, you
need to use @DelegatesTo
differently:
public <T> void configure(
@DelegatesTo.Target List<T> elements,
@DelegatesTo(strategy=Closure.DELEGATE_FIRST, genericTypeIndex=0) Closure configuration) {
def clone = configuration.rehydrate(e, this, this)
clone.resolveStrategy = Closure.DELEGATE_FIRST
clone.call()
}
@DelegatesTo
takes an optional genericTypeIndex
argument that tells what is the index of the generic type that will
be used as the delegate type. This must be used in conjunction with @DelegatesTo.Target
and the index starts at 0. In
the example above, that means that the delegate type is resolved against List<T>
, and since the generic type at index
0 is T
and inferred as a Realm
, the type checker infers that the delegate type will be of type Realm
.
We’re using a genericTypeIndex instead of a placeholder (T ) because of JVM limitations.
|
Delegating to an arbitrary type
It is possible that none of the options above can represent the type you want to delegate to. For example, let’s define a mapper class which is parametrized with an object and defines a map method which returns an object of another type:
class Mapper<T,U> { (1)
final T value (2)
Mapper(T value) { this.value = value }
U map(Closure<U> producer) { (3)
producer.delegate = value
producer()
}
}
1 | The mapper class takes two generic type arguments: the source type and the target type |
2 | The source object is stored in a final field |
3 | The map method asks to convert the source object to a target object |
As you can see, the method signature from map
does not give any information about what object will
be manipulated by the closure. Reading the method body, we know that it will be the value
which is
of type T
, but T
is not found in the method signature, so we are facing a case where none of the
available options for @DelegatesTo
is suitable. For example, if we try to statically compile this code:
def mapper = new Mapper<String,Integer>('Hello')
assert mapper.map { length() } == 5
Then the compiler will fail with:
Static type checking] - Cannot find matching method TestScript0#length()
In that case, you can use the type
member of the @DelegatesTo
annotation to reference T
as a type token:
class Mapper<T,U> {
final T value
Mapper(T value) { this.value = value }
U map(@DelegatesTo(type="T") Closure<U> producer) { (1)
producer.delegate = value
producer()
}
}
1 | The @DelegatesTo annotation references a generic type which is not found in the method signature |
Note that you are not limited to generic type tokens. The type
member can be used to represent complex types, such
as List<T>
or Map<T,List<U>>
. The reason why you should use that in last resort is that the type is only checked
when the type checker finds usage of @DelegatesTo
, not when the annotated method itself is compiled. This means that
type safety is only ensured at the call site. Additionally, compilation will be slower (though probably unnoticeable for
most cases).
3.15.6. Compilation customizers
Introduction
Whether you are using groovyc
to compile classes or a GroovyShell
,
for example, to execute scripts, under the hood, a compiler configuration is used. This configuration holds information
like the source encoding or the classpath but it can also be used to perform more operations like adding imports by
default, applying AST transformations transparently or disabling global AST transformations.
The goal of compilation customizers is to make those common tasks easy to implement. For that, the CompilerConfiguration
class is the entry point. The general schema will always be based on the following code:
import org.codehaus.groovy.control.CompilerConfiguration
// create a configuration
def config = new CompilerConfiguration()
// tweak the configuration
config.addCompilationCustomizers(...)
// run your script
def shell = new GroovyShell(config)
shell.evaluate(script)
Compilation customizers must extend the org.codehaus.groovy.control.customizers.CompilationCustomizer class. A customizer works:
-
on a specific compilation phase
-
on every class node being compiled
You can implement your own compilation customizer but Groovy includes some of the most common operations.
Import customizer
Using this compilation customizer, your code will have imports added transparently. This is in particular useful for scripts implementing a DSL where you want to avoid users from having to write imports. The import customizer will let you add all the variants of imports the Groovy language allows, that is:
-
class imports, optionally aliased
-
star imports
-
static imports, optionally aliased
-
static star imports
import org.codehaus.groovy.control.customizers.ImportCustomizer
def icz = new ImportCustomizer()
// "normal" import
icz.addImports('java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger', 'java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap')
// "aliases" import
icz.addImport('CHM', 'java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap')
// "static" import
icz.addStaticImport('java.lang.Math', 'PI') // import static java.lang.Math.PI
// "aliased static" import
icz.addStaticImport('pi', 'java.lang.Math', 'PI') // import static java.lang.Math.PI as pi
// "star" import
icz.addStarImports 'java.util.concurrent' // import java.util.concurrent.*
// "static star" import
icz.addStaticStars 'java.lang.Math' // import static java.lang.Math.*
A detailed description of all shortcuts can be found in org.codehaus.groovy.control.customizers.ImportCustomizer
AST transformation customizer
The AST transformation customizer is meant to apply AST transformations transparently. Unlike global AST transformations that apply on every class being compiled as long as the transform is found on classpath (which has drawbacks like increasing the compilation time or side effects due to transformations applied where they should not), the customizer will allow you to selectively apply a transform only for specific scripts or classes.
As an example, let’s say you want to be able to use @Log
in a script.
The problem is that @Log
is normally applied on a class node and a
script, by definition, doesn’t require one. But implementation wise,
scripts are classes, it’s just that you cannot annotate this implicit
class node with @Log
. Using the AST customizer, you have a workaround
to do it:
import org.codehaus.groovy.control.customizers.ASTTransformationCustomizer
import groovy.util.logging.Log
def acz = new ASTTransformationCustomizer(Log)
config.addCompilationCustomizers(acz)
That’s all! Internally, the @Log
AST transformation is applied to
every class node in the compilation unit. This means that it will be
applied to the script, but also to classes defined within the script.
If the AST transformation that you are using accepts parameters, you can use parameters in the constructor too:
def acz = new ASTTransformationCustomizer(Log, value: 'LOGGER')
// use name 'LOGGER' instead of the default 'log'
config.addCompilationCustomizers(acz)
As the AST transformation customizers works with objects instead of AST
nodes, not all values can be converted to AST transformation parameters.
For example, primitive types are converted to ConstantExpression
(that
is LOGGER
is converted to new ConstantExpression('LOGGER')
, but if
your AST transformation takes a closure as an argument, then you have to
give it a ClosureExpression
, like in the following example:
def configuration = new CompilerConfiguration()
def expression = new AstBuilder().buildFromCode(CompilePhase.CONVERSION) { -> true }.expression[0]
def customizer = new ASTTransformationCustomizer(ConditionalInterrupt, value: expression, thrown: SecurityException)
configuration.addCompilationCustomizers(customizer)
def shell = new GroovyShell(configuration)
shouldFail(SecurityException) {
shell.evaluate("""
// equivalent to adding @ConditionalInterrupt(value={true}, thrown: SecurityException)
class MyClass {
void doIt() { }
}
new MyClass().doIt()
""")
}
For a complete list of options, please refer to org.codehaus.groovy.control.customizers.ASTTransformationCustomizer
Secure AST customizer
This customizer will allow the developer of a DSL to restrict the grammar of the language, for example, to prevent users from using particular constructs. It is only ``secure'' in that one aspect, i.e. limiting the allowable constructs within a DSL. It does not replace a security manager which might additionally be needed as an orthogonal aspect of overall security. The only reason for it to exist is to limit the expressiveness of the language. This customizer only works at the AST (abstract syntax tree) level, not at runtime! It can be strange at first glance, but it makes much more sense if you think of Groovy as a platform to build DSLs. You may not want a user to have a complete language at hand. In the example below, we will demonstrate it using an example of language that only allows arithmetic operations, but this customizer allows you to:
-
allow/disallow creation of closures
-
allow/disallow imports
-
allow/disallow package definition
-
allow/disallow definition of methods
-
restrict the receivers of method calls
-
restrict the kind of AST expressions a user can use
-
restrict the tokens (grammar-wise) a user can use
-
restrict the types of the constants that can be used in code
For all those features, the secure AST customizer works using either an allowed list (list of elements that are permitted) or a disallowed list (list of elements that are not permitted). For each type of feature (imports, tokens, …) you have the choice to use either an allowed or disallowed list, but you can mix dis/allowed lists for distinct features. Typically, you will choose allowed lists (which permits only the constructs listed and disallows all others).
import org.codehaus.groovy.control.customizers.SecureASTCustomizer
import static org.codehaus.groovy.syntax.Types.* (1)
def scz = new SecureASTCustomizer()
scz.with {
closuresAllowed = false // user will not be able to write closures
methodDefinitionAllowed = false // user will not be able to define methods
allowedImports = [] // empty allowed list means imports are disallowed
allowedStaticImports = [] // same for static imports
allowedStaticStarImports = ['java.lang.Math'] // only java.lang.Math is allowed
// the list of tokens the user can find
// constants are defined in org.codehaus.groovy.syntax.Types
allowedTokens = [ (1)
PLUS,
MINUS,
MULTIPLY,
DIVIDE,
MOD,
POWER,
PLUS_PLUS,
MINUS_MINUS,
COMPARE_EQUAL,
COMPARE_NOT_EQUAL,
COMPARE_LESS_THAN,
COMPARE_LESS_THAN_EQUAL,
COMPARE_GREATER_THAN,
COMPARE_GREATER_THAN_EQUAL,
].asImmutable()
// limit the types of constants that a user can define to number types only
allowedConstantTypesClasses = [ (2)
Integer,
Float,
Long,
Double,
BigDecimal,
Integer.TYPE,
Long.TYPE,
Float.TYPE,
Double.TYPE
].asImmutable()
// method calls are only allowed if the receiver is of one of those types
// be careful, it's not a runtime type!
allowedReceiversClasses = [ (2)
Math,
Integer,
Float,
Double,
Long,
BigDecimal
].asImmutable()
}
1 | use for token types from org.codehaus.groovy.syntax.Types |
2 | you can use class literals here |
If what the secure AST customizer provides out of the box isn’t enough
for your needs, before creating your own compilation customizer, you
might be interested in the expression and statement checkers that the
AST customizer supports. Basically, it allows you to add custom checks
on the AST tree, on expressions (expression checkers) or statements
(statement checkers). For this, you must
implement org.codehaus.groovy.control.customizers.SecureASTCustomizer.StatementChecker
or org.codehaus.groovy.control.customizers.SecureASTCustomizer.ExpressionChecker
.
Those interfaces define a single method called isAuthorized
, returning
a boolean, and taking a Statement
(or Expression
) as a parameter. It
allows you to perform complex logic over expressions or statements to
tell if a user is allowed to do it or not.
For example, there’s no predefined configuration flag in the customizer which will let you prevent people from using an attribute expression. Using a custom checker, it is trivial:
def scz = new SecureASTCustomizer()
def checker = { expr ->
!(expr instanceof AttributeExpression)
} as SecureASTCustomizer.ExpressionChecker
scz.addExpressionCheckers(checker)
Then we can make sure that this works by evaluating a simple script:
new GroovyShell(config).evaluate '''
class A {
int val
}
def a = new A(val: 123)
a.@val (1)
'''
1 | will fail compilation |
Statements can be checked using org.codehaus.groovy.control.customizers.SecureASTCustomizer.StatementChecker Expressions can be checked using org.codehaus.groovy.control.customizers.SecureASTCustomizer.ExpressionChecker
Source aware customizer
This customizer may be used as a filter on other customizers. The
filter, in that case, is the org.codehaus.groovy.control.SourceUnit
.
For this, the source aware customizer takes another customizer as a
delegate, and it will apply customization of that delegate only and only
if predicates on the source unit match.
SourceUnit
gives you access to multiple things but in particular the
file being compiled (if compiling from a file, of course). It gives
you the potential to perform operation based on the file name, for
example. Here is how you would create a source aware customizer:
import org.codehaus.groovy.control.customizers.SourceAwareCustomizer
import org.codehaus.groovy.control.customizers.ImportCustomizer
def delegate = new ImportCustomizer()
def sac = new SourceAwareCustomizer(delegate)
Then you can use predicates on the source aware customizer:
// the customizer will only be applied to classes contained in a file name ending with 'Bean'
sac.baseNameValidator = { baseName ->
baseName.endsWith 'Bean'
}
// the customizer will only be applied to files which extension is '.spec'
sac.extensionValidator = { ext -> ext == 'spec' }
// source unit validation
// allow compilation only if the file contains at most 1 class
sac.sourceUnitValidator = { SourceUnit sourceUnit -> sourceUnit.AST.classes.size() == 1 }
// class validation
// the customizer will only be applied to classes ending with 'Bean'
sac.classValidator = { ClassNode cn -> cn.endsWith('Bean') }
Customizer builder
If you are using compilation customizers in Groovy code (like the
examples above) then you can use an alternative syntax to customize compilation.
A builder (org.codehaus.groovy.control.customizers.builder.CompilerCustomizationBuilder
)
simplifies the creation of customizers using a hierarchical DSL.
import org.codehaus.groovy.control.CompilerConfiguration
import static org.codehaus.groovy.control.customizers.builder.CompilerCustomizationBuilder.withConfig (1)
def conf = new CompilerConfiguration()
withConfig(conf) {
// ... (2)
}
1 | static import of the builder method |
2 | configuration goes here |
The code sample above shows how to use the builder. A static method, withConfig, takes a closure corresponding to the builder code, and automatically registers compilation customizers to the configuration. Every compilation customizer available in the distribution can be configured this way:
Import customizer
withConfig(configuration) {
imports { // imports customizer
normal 'my.package.MyClass' // a normal import
alias 'AI', 'java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger' // an aliased import
star 'java.util.concurrent' // star imports
staticMember 'java.lang.Math', 'PI' // static import
staticMember 'pi', 'java.lang.Math', 'PI' // aliased static import
}
}
AST transformation customizer
withConfig(conf) {
ast(Log) (1)
}
withConfig(conf) {
ast(Log, value: 'LOGGER') (2)
}
1 | apply @Log transparently |
2 | apply @Log with a different name for the logger |
Secure AST customizer
withConfig(conf) {
secureAst {
closuresAllowed = false
methodDefinitionAllowed = false
}
}
Source aware customizer
withConfig(configuration){
source(extension: 'sgroovy') {
ast(CompileStatic) (1)
}
}
withConfig(configuration){
source(extensions: ['sgroovy','sg']) {
ast(CompileStatic) (2)
}
}
withConfig(configuration) {
source(extensionValidator: { it.name in ['sgroovy','sg']}) {
ast(CompileStatic) (2)
}
}
withConfig(configuration) {
source(basename: 'foo') {
ast(CompileStatic) (3)
}
}
withConfig(configuration) {
source(basenames: ['foo', 'bar']) {
ast(CompileStatic) (4)
}
}
withConfig(configuration) {
source(basenameValidator: { it in ['foo', 'bar'] }) {
ast(CompileStatic) (4)
}
}
withConfig(configuration) {
source(unitValidator: { unit -> !unit.AST.classes.any { it.name == 'Baz' } }) {
ast(CompileStatic) (5)
}
}
1 | apply CompileStatic AST annotation on .sgroovy files |
2 | apply CompileStatic AST annotation on .sgroovy or .sg files |
3 | apply CompileStatic AST annotation on files whose name is 'foo' |
4 | apply CompileStatic AST annotation on files whose name is 'foo' or 'bar' |
5 | apply CompileStatic AST annotation on files that do not contain a class named 'Baz' |
Inlining a customizer
Inlined customizer allows you to write a compilation customizer directly, without having to create a class for it.
withConfig(configuration) {
inline(phase:'CONVERSION') { source, context, classNode -> (1)
println "visiting $classNode" (2)
}
}
1 | define an inlined customizer which will execute at the CONVERSION phase |
2 | prints the name of the class node being compiled |
Config script flag
So far, we have described how you can customize compilation using
a CompilationConfiguration
class, but this is only possible if you
embed Groovy and that you create your own instances
of CompilerConfiguration
(then use it to create a
GroovyShell
, GroovyScriptEngine
, …).
If you want it to be applied on the classes you compile with the normal
Groovy compiler (that is to say with groovyc
, ant
or gradle
,
for example), it is possible to use a compilation flag named configscript
that takes a Groovy configuration script as argument.
This script gives you access to the CompilerConfiguration
instance before
the files are compiled (exposed into the configuration script as a variable named configuration
),
so that you can tweak it.
It also transparently integrates the compiler configuration builder above. As an example, let’s see how you would activate static compilation by default on all classes.
Static compilation by default
Normally, classes in Groovy are compiled with a dynamic runtime. You can activate static compilation
by placing an annotation named @CompileStatic
on any class. Some people would like to have this
mode activated by default, that is to say not having to annotated classes. Using configscript
,
this is possible. First of all, you need to create a file named config.groovy
into src/conf
with
the following contents:
withConfig(configuration) { (1)
ast(groovy.transform.CompileStatic)
}
1 | configuration references a CompilerConfiguration instance |
That is actually all you need. You don’t have to import the builder, it’s automatically exposed in the script. Then, compile your files using the following command line:
groovyc -configscript src/conf/config.groovy src/main/groovy/MyClass.groovy
We strongly recommend you to separate configuration files from classes,
hence why we suggest using the src/main
and src/conf
directories above.
AST transformations
If:
-
runtime metaprogramming doesn’t allow you do do what you want
-
you need to improve the performance of the execution of your DSLs
-
you want to leverage the same syntax as Groovy but with different semantics
-
you want to improve support for type checking in your DSLs
Then AST transformations are the way to go. Unlike the techniques used so far, AST transformations are meant to change or generate code before it is compiled to bytecode. AST transformations are capable of adding new methods at compile time for example, or totally changing the body of a method based on your needs. They are a very powerful tool but also come at the price of not being easy to write. For more information about AST transformations, please take a look at the compile-time metaprogramming section of this manual.
3.15.7. Custom type checking extensions
It may be interesting, in some circumstances, to provide feedback about wrong code to the user as soon as possible, that is to say when the DSL script is compiled, rather than having to wait for the execution of the script. However, this is not often possible with dynamic code. Groovy actually provides a practical answer to this known as type checking extensions.
3.15.8. Builders
(TBD)
Existing builders
(TBD)
SaxBuilder
A builder for generating Simple API for XML (SAX) events.
If you have the following SAX handler:
class LogHandler extends org.xml.sax.helpers.DefaultHandler {
String log = ''
void startElement(String uri, String localName, String qName, org.xml.sax.Attributes attributes) {
log += "Start Element: $localName, "
}
void endElement(String uri, String localName, String qName) {
log += "End Element: $localName, "
}
}
You can use SaxBuilder
to generate SAX events for the handler like this:
def handler = new LogHandler()
def builder = new groovy.xml.SAXBuilder(handler)
builder.root() {
helloWorld()
}
And then check that everything worked as expected:
assert handler.log == 'Start Element: root, Start Element: helloWorld, End Element: helloWorld, End Element: root, '
StaxBuilder
A Groovy builder that works with Streaming API for XML (StAX) processors.
Here is a simple example using the StAX implementation of Java to generate XML:
def factory = javax.xml.stream.XMLOutputFactory.newInstance()
def writer = new StringWriter()
def builder = new groovy.xml.StaxBuilder(factory.createXMLStreamWriter(writer))
builder.root(attribute:1) {
elem1('hello')
elem2('world')
}
assert writer.toString() == '<?xml version="1.0" ?><root attribute="1"><elem1>hello</elem1><elem2>world</elem2></root>'
An external library such as Jettison can be used as follows:
@Grab('org.codehaus.jettison:jettison:1.3.3')
@GrabExclude('stax:stax-api') // part of Java 6 and later
import org.codehaus.jettison.mapped.*
def writer = new StringWriter()
def mappedWriter = new MappedXMLStreamWriter(new MappedNamespaceConvention(), writer)
def builder = new groovy.xml.StaxBuilder(mappedWriter)
builder.root(attribute:1) {
elem1('hello')
elem2('world')
}
assert writer.toString() == '{"root":{"@attribute":"1","elem1":"hello","elem2":"world"}}'
DOMBuilder
A builder for parsing HTML, XHTML and XML into a W3C DOM tree.
For example this XML String
:
String recordsXML = '''
<records>
<car name='HSV Maloo' make='Holden' year='2006'>
<country>Australia</country>
<record type='speed'>Production Pickup Truck with speed of 271kph</record>
</car>
<car name='P50' make='Peel' year='1962'>
<country>Isle of Man</country>
<record type='size'>Smallest Street-Legal Car at 99cm wide and 59 kg in weight</record>
</car>
<car name='Royale' make='Bugatti' year='1931'>
<country>France</country>
<record type='price'>Most Valuable Car at $15 million</record>
</car>
</records>'''
Can be parsed into a DOM tree with a DOMBuilder
like this:
def reader = new StringReader(recordsXML)
def doc = groovy.xml.DOMBuilder.parse(reader)
And then processed further e.g. by using DOMCategory:
def records = doc.documentElement
use(groovy.xml.dom.DOMCategory) {
assert records.car.size() == 3
}
NodeBuilder
NodeBuilder
is used for creating nested trees of Node objects for handling arbitrary data.
To create a simple user list you use a NodeBuilder
like this:
def nodeBuilder = new NodeBuilder()
def userlist = nodeBuilder.userlist {
user(id: '1', firstname: 'John', lastname: 'Smith') {
address(type: 'home', street: '1 Main St.', city: 'Springfield', state: 'MA', zip: '12345')
address(type: 'work', street: '2 South St.', city: 'Boston', state: 'MA', zip: '98765')
}
user(id: '2', firstname: 'Alice', lastname: 'Doe')
}
Now you can process the data further, e.g. by using GPath expressions:
assert userlist.user.@firstname.join(', ') == 'John, Alice'
assert userlist.user.find { it.@lastname == 'Smith' }.address.size() == 2
JsonBuilder
Groovy’s JsonBuilder
makes it easy to create Json. For example to create this Json string:
String carRecords = '''
{
"records": {
"car": {
"name": "HSV Maloo",
"make": "Holden",
"year": 2006,
"country": "Australia",
"record": {
"type": "speed",
"description": "production pickup truck with speed of 271kph"
}
}
}
}
'''
you can use a JsonBuilder
like this:
JsonBuilder builder = new JsonBuilder()
builder.records {
car {
name 'HSV Maloo'
make 'Holden'
year 2006
country 'Australia'
record {
type 'speed'
description 'production pickup truck with speed of 271kph'
}
}
}
String json = JsonOutput.prettyPrint(builder.toString())
We use JsonUnit to check that the builder produced the expected result:
JsonAssert.assertJsonEquals(json, carRecords)
If you need to customize the generated output you can pass a JsonGenerator
instance when creating a JsonBuilder
:
import groovy.json.*
def generator = new JsonGenerator.Options()
.excludeNulls()
.excludeFieldsByName('make', 'country', 'record')
.excludeFieldsByType(Number)
.addConverter(URL) { url -> "http://groovy-lang.org" }
.build()
JsonBuilder builder = new JsonBuilder(generator)
builder.records {
car {
name 'HSV Maloo'
make 'Holden'
year 2006
country 'Australia'
homepage new URL('http://example.org')
record {
type 'speed'
description 'production pickup truck with speed of 271kph'
}
}
}
assert builder.toString() == '{"records":{"car":{"name":"HSV Maloo","homepage":"http://groovy-lang.org"}}}'
StreamingJsonBuilder
Unlike JsonBuilder
which creates a data structure in memory, which is handy in those situations where you want to alter the structure programmatically before output,
StreamingJsonBuilder
directly streams to a writer without any intermediate memory data structure.
If you do not need to modify the structure and want a more memory-efficient approach, use StreamingJsonBuilder
.
The usage of StreamingJsonBuilder
is similar to JsonBuilder
. In order to create this Json string:
String carRecords = '''
{
"records": {
"car": {
"name": "HSV Maloo",
"make": "Holden",
"year": 2006,
"country": "Australia",
"record": {
"type": "speed",
"description": "production pickup truck with speed of 271kph"
}
}
}
}
'''
you use a StreamingJsonBuilder
like this:
StringWriter writer = new StringWriter()
StreamingJsonBuilder builder = new StreamingJsonBuilder(writer)
builder.records {
car {
name 'HSV Maloo'
make 'Holden'
year 2006
country 'Australia'
record {
type 'speed'
description 'production pickup truck with speed of 271kph'
}
}
}
String json = JsonOutput.prettyPrint(writer.toString())
We use JsonUnit to check the expected result:
JsonAssert.assertJsonEquals(json, carRecords)
If you need to customize the generated output you can pass a JsonGenerator
instance when creating a StreamingJsonBuilder
:
def generator = new JsonGenerator.Options()
.excludeNulls()
.excludeFieldsByName('make', 'country', 'record')
.excludeFieldsByType(Number)
.addConverter(URL) { url -> "http://groovy-lang.org" }
.build()
StringWriter writer = new StringWriter()
StreamingJsonBuilder builder = new StreamingJsonBuilder(writer, generator)
builder.records {
car {
name 'HSV Maloo'
make 'Holden'
year 2006
country 'Australia'
homepage new URL('http://example.org')
record {
type 'speed'
description 'production pickup truck with speed of 271kph'
}
}
}
assert writer.toString() == '{"records":{"car":{"name":"HSV Maloo","homepage":"http://groovy-lang.org"}}}'
SwingBuilder
SwingBuilder
allows you to create full-fledged Swing GUIs in a declarative and concise fashion. It accomplishes this by employing a common idiom in Groovy, builders.
Builders handle the busywork of creating complex objects for you, such as instantiating children, calling Swing methods, and attaching these children to their parents.
As a consequence, your code is much more readable and maintainable, while still allowing you access to the full range of Swing components.
Here’s a simple example of using SwingBuilder
:
import groovy.swing.SwingBuilder
import java.awt.BorderLayout as BL
count = 0
new SwingBuilder().edt {
frame(title: 'Frame', size: [250, 75], show: true) {
borderLayout()
textlabel = label(text: 'Click the button!', constraints: BL.NORTH)
button(text:'Click Me',
actionPerformed: {count++; textlabel.text = "Clicked ${count} time(s)."; println "clicked"}, constraints:BL.SOUTH)
}
}
Here is what it will look like:
This hierarchy of components would normally be created through a series of repetitive instantiations, setters, and finally attaching this child to its respective parent.
Using SwingBuilder
, however, allows you to define this hierarchy in its native form, which makes the interface design understandable simply by reading the code.
The flexibility shown here is made possible by leveraging the many programming features built-in to Groovy, such as closures, implicit constructor calling, import aliasing, and string interpolation.
Of course, these do not have to be fully understood in order to use SwingBuilder
; as you can see from the code above, their uses are intuitive.
Here is a slightly more involved example, with an example of SwingBuilder
code re-use via a closure.
import groovy.swing.SwingBuilder
import javax.swing.*
import java.awt.*
def swing = new SwingBuilder()
def sharedPanel = {
swing.panel() {
label("Shared Panel")
}
}
count = 0
swing.edt {
frame(title: 'Frame', defaultCloseOperation: JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE, pack: true, show: true) {
vbox {
textlabel = label('Click the button!')
button(
text: 'Click Me',
actionPerformed: {
count++
textlabel.text = "Clicked ${count} time(s)."
println "Clicked!"
}
)
widget(sharedPanel())
widget(sharedPanel())
}
}
}
Here’s another variation that relies on observable beans and binding:
import groovy.swing.SwingBuilder
import groovy.beans.Bindable
class MyModel {
@Bindable int count = 0
}
def model = new MyModel()
new SwingBuilder().edt {
frame(title: 'Java Frame', size: [100, 100], locationRelativeTo: null, show: true) {
gridLayout(cols: 1, rows: 2)
label(text: bind(source: model, sourceProperty: 'count', converter: { v -> v? "Clicked $v times": ''}))
button('Click me!', actionPerformed: { model.count++ })
}
}
@Bindable is one of the core AST Transformations. It generates all the required boilerplate code to turn a simple bean into an observable one. The bind()
node creates appropriate PropertyChangeListeners
that will update the interested parties whenever a PropertyChangeEvent
is fired.
AntBuilder
Here we describe AntBuilder which lets you write Ant build scripts
in Groovy rather than XML. You may also be interested in using Groovy
from Ant using the Groovy Ant task.
|
Despite being primarily a build tool, Apache Ant is
a very practical tool for manipulating files including zip files, copy, resource processing, and more.
But if ever you’ve been working with a build.xml
file or some Jelly script
and found yourself a little restricted by all those pointy brackets, or
found it a bit weird using XML as a scripting language and wanted
something a little cleaner and more straight forward, then maybe Ant
scripting with Groovy might be what you’re after.
Groovy has a helper class called AntBuilder
which makes the scripting
of Ant tasks really easy; allowing a real scripting language to be used
for programming constructs (variables, methods, loops, logical
branching, classes etc). It still looks like a neat concise version of
Ant’s XML without all those pointy brackets; though you can mix and
match this markup inside your script. Ant itself is a collection of jar
files. By adding them to your classpath, you can easily use them within
Groovy as is. We believe using AntBuilder
leads to more concise and
readily understood syntax.
AntBuilder
exposes Ant tasks directly using the convenient builder notation that
we are used to in Groovy. Here is the most basic example, which is printing a message
on the standard output:
def ant = new groovy.ant.AntBuilder() (1)
ant.echo('hello from Ant!') (2)
1 | creates an instance of AntBuilder |
2 | executes the echo task with the message in parameter |
Imagine that you need to create a ZIP file. It can be as simple as:
def ant = new AntBuilder()
ant.zip(destfile: 'sources.zip', basedir: 'src')
In the next example, we demonstrate the use of AntBuilder
to copy a list of files
using a classical Ant pattern directly in Groovy:
// let's just call one task
ant.echo("hello")
// here is an example of a block of Ant inside GroovyMarkup
ant.sequential {
echo("inside sequential")
def myDir = "target/AntTest/"
mkdir(dir: myDir)
copy(todir: myDir) {
fileset(dir: "src/test") {
include(name: "**/*.groovy")
}
}
echo("done")
}
// now let's do some normal Groovy again
def file = new File(ant.project.baseDir,"target/AntTest/some/pkg/MyTest.groovy")
assert file.exists()
Another example would be iterating over a list of files matching a specific pattern:
// let's create a scanner of filesets
def scanner = ant.fileScanner {
fileset(dir:"src/test") {
include(name:"**/My*.groovy")
}
}
// now let's iterate over
def found = false
for (f in scanner) {
println("Found file $f")
found = true
assert f instanceof File
assert f.name.endsWith(".groovy")
}
assert found
Or executing a JUnit test:
ant.junit {
classpath { pathelement(path: '.') }
test(name:'some.pkg.MyTest')
}
We can even go further by compiling and executing a Java file directly from Groovy:
ant.echo(file:'Temp.java', '''
class Temp {
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println("Hello");
}
}
''')
ant.javac(srcdir:'.', includes:'Temp.java', fork:'true')
ant.java(classpath:'.', classname:'Temp', fork:'true')
ant.echo('Done')
It is worth mentioning that AntBuilder
is included in Gradle, so you can use it in Gradle
just like you would in Groovy. Additional documentation can be found in the
Gradle manual.
CliBuilder
CliBuilder
provides a compact way to specify the available options for a commandline application and then
automatically parse the application’s commandline parameters according to that specification. By convention,
a distinction is made between option commandline parameters and any remaining parameters which are passed
to an application as its arguments. Typically, several types of options might be supported such as -V
or
--tabsize=4
. CliBuilder
removes the burden of developing lots of code for commandline processing.
Instead, it supports a somewhat declarative approach to declaring your options and then provides a single call
to parse the commandline parameters with a simple mechanism to interrogate the options (you can think of this
as a simple model for your options).
Even though the details of each commandline you create could be quite different, the same main steps are
followed each time. First, a CliBuilder
instance is created. Then, allowed commandline options are defined.
This can be done using a dynamic api style or an annotation style.
The commandline parameters are then parsed according to the options specification resulting in a
collection of options which are then interrogated.
Here is a simple example Greeter.groovy
script illustrating usage:
// import of CliBuilder not shown (1)
// specify parameters
def cli = new CliBuilder(usage: 'groovy Greeter [option]') (2)
cli.a(longOpt: 'audience', args: 1, 'greeting audience') (3)
cli.h(longOpt: 'help', 'display usage') (4)
// parse and process parameters
def options = cli.parse(args) (5)
if (options.h) cli.usage() (6)
else println "Hello ${options.a ? options.a : 'World'}" (7)
1 | Earlier versions of Groovy had a CliBuilder in the groovy.util package and no import was necessary.
In Groovy 2.5, this approach became deprecated: applications should instead choose the groovy.cli.picocli or groovy.cli.commons version.
The groovy.util version in Groovy 2.5 points to the commons-cli version for backwards compatibility but has been removed in Groovy 3.0. |
2 | define a new CliBuilder instance specifying an optional usage string |
3 | specify a -a option taking a single argument with an optional long variant --audience |
4 | specify a -h option taking no arguments with an optional long variant --help |
5 | parse the commandline parameters supplied to the script |
6 | if the h option is found display a usage message |
7 | display a standard greeting or, if the a option is found, a customized greeting |
Running this script with no commandline parameters, i.e.:
> groovy Greeter
results in the following output:
Hello World
Running this script with -h
as the single commandline parameter, i.e.:
> groovy Greeter -h
results in the following output:
usage: groovy Greeter [option] -a,--audience <arg> greeting audience -h,--help display usage
Running this script with --audience Groovologist
as the commandline parameters, i.e.:
> groovy Greeter --audience Groovologist
results in the following output:
Hello Groovologist
When creating the CliBuilder
instance in the above example, we set the optional usage
property
within the constructor call. This follows Groovy’s normal ability to set additional properties
of the instance during construction. There are numerous other properties which can be set
such as header
and footer
. For the complete set of available properties, see the
available properties for the CliBuilder class.
When defining an allowed commandline option, both a short name (e.g. "h" for the help
option shown previously)
and a short description (e.g. "display usage" for the help
option) must be supplied.
In our example above, we also set some
additional properties such as longOpt
and args
. The following additional
properties are supported when specifying an allowed commandline option:
Name | Description | Type |
---|---|---|
argName |
the name of the argument for this option used in output |
|
longOpt |
the long representation or long name of the option |
|
args |
the number of argument values |
|
optionalArg |
whether the argument value is optional |
|
required |
whether the option is mandatory |
|
type |
the type of this option |
|
valueSeparator |
the character that is the value separator |
|
defaultValue |
a default value |
|
convert |
converts the incoming String to the required type |
|
1 | More details later |
2 | Single character Strings are coerced to chars in special cases in Groovy |
If you have an option with only a longOpt
variant, you can use the special shortname of '_'
to specify the option, e.g. : cli._(longOpt: 'verbose', 'enable verbose logging')
.
Some of the remaining named parameters should be fairly self-explanatory while others deserve
a bit more explanation. But before further explanations, let’s look at ways of using
CliBuilder
with annotations.
Rather than making a series of method calls (albeit in a very declarative mini-DSL form) to specify the allowable options, you can provide an interface specification of the allowable options where annotations are used to indicate and provide details for those options and for how unprocessed parameters are handled. Two annotations are used: groovy.cli.Option and groovy.cli.Unparsed.
Here is how such a specification can be defined:
interface GreeterI {
@Option(shortName='h', description='display usage') Boolean help() (1)
@Option(shortName='a', description='greeting audience') String audience() (2)
@Unparsed(description = "positional parameters") List remaining() (3)
}
1 | Specify a Boolean option set using -h or --help |
2 | Specify a String option set using -a or --audience |
3 | Specify where any remaining parameters will be stored |
Note how the long name is automatically determined from the interface method name.
You can use the longName
annotation attribute to override that behavior and specify
a custom long name if you wish or use a longName of '_' to indicate that no long name
is to be provided. You will need to specify a shortName in such a case.
Here is how you could use the interface specification:
// import CliBuilder not shown
def cli = new CliBuilder(usage: 'groovy Greeter') (1)
def argz = '--audience Groovologist'.split()
def options = cli.parseFromSpec(GreeterI, argz) (2)
assert options.audience() == 'Groovologist' (3)
argz = '-h Some Other Args'.split()
options = cli.parseFromSpec(GreeterI, argz) (4)
assert options.help()
assert options.remaining() == ['Some', 'Other', 'Args'] (5)
1 | Create a CliBuilder instance as before with optional properties |
2 | Parse parameters using the interface specification |
3 | Interrogate options using the methods from the interface |
4 | Parse a different set of parameters |
5 | Interrogate the remaining parameters |
When parseFromSpec
is called, CliBuilder
automatically creates an instance implementing the interface
and populates it. You simply call the interface methods to interrogate the option values.
Alternatively, perhaps you already have a domain class containing the option information.
You can simply annotate properties or setters from that class to enable CliBuilder
to appropriately
populate your domain object. Each annotation both describes that option’s properties through the annotation
attributes and indicates the setter the CliBuilder
will use to populate that option in your domain object.
Here is how such a specification can be defined:
class GreeterC {
@Option(shortName='h', description='display usage')
Boolean help (1)
private String audience
@Option(shortName='a', description='greeting audience')
void setAudience(String audience) { (2)
this.audience = audience
}
String getAudience() { audience }
@Unparsed(description = "positional parameters")
List remaining (3)
}
1 | Indicate that a Boolean property is an option |
2 | Indicate that a String property (with explicit setter) is an option |
3 | Specify where any remaining args will be stored |
And here is how you could use the specification:
// import CliBuilder not shown
def cli = new CliBuilder(usage: 'groovy Greeter [option]') (1)
def options = new GreeterC() (2)
def argz = '--audience Groovologist foo'.split()
cli.parseFromInstance(options, argz) (3)
assert options.audience == 'Groovologist' (4)
assert options.remaining == ['foo'] (5)
1 | Create a CliBuilder instance as before with optional parameters |
2 | Create an instance for CliBuilder to populate |
3 | Parse arguments populating the supplied instance |
4 | Interrogate the String option property |
5 | Interrogate the remaining arguments property |
When parseFromInstance
is called, CliBuilder
automatically populates your instance.
You simply interrogate the instance properties (or whatever accessor methods you have provided
in your domain object) to access the option values.
Finally, there are two additional convenience annotation aliases specifically for scripts. They simply combine the previously mentioned annotations and groovy.transform.Field. The groovydoc for those annotations reveals the details: groovy.cli.OptionField and groovy.cli.UnparsedField.
Here is an example using those annotations in a self-contained script that would be called with the same arguments as shown for the instance example earlier:
// import CliBuilder not shown
import groovy.cli.OptionField
import groovy.cli.UnparsedField
@OptionField String audience
@OptionField Boolean help
@UnparsedField List remaining
new CliBuilder().parseFromInstance(this, args)
assert audience == 'Groovologist'
assert remaining == ['foo']
We saw in our initial example that some options act like flags, e.g. Greeter -h
but
others take an argument, e.g. Greeter --audience Groovologist
. The simplest cases
involve options which act like flags or have a single (potentially optional) argument.
Here is an example involving those cases:
// import CliBuilder not shown
def cli = new CliBuilder()
cli.a(args: 0, 'a arg') (1)
cli.b(args: 1, 'b arg') (2)
cli.c(args: 1, optionalArg: true, 'c arg') (3)
def options = cli.parse('-a -b foo -c bar baz'.split()) (4)
assert options.a == true
assert options.b == 'foo'
assert options.c == 'bar'
assert options.arguments() == ['baz']
options = cli.parse('-a -c -b foo bar baz'.split()) (5)
assert options.a == true
assert options.c == true
assert options.b == 'foo'
assert options.arguments() == ['bar', 'baz']
1 | An option that is simply a flag - the default; setting args to 0 is allowed but not needed. |
2 | An option with exactly one argument |
3 | An option with an optional argument; it acts like a flag if the option is left out |
4 | An example using this spec where an argument is supplied to the 'c' option |
5 | An example using this spec where no argument is supplied to the 'c' option; it’s just a flag |
Note: when an option with an optional argument is encountered, it will (somewhat) greedily consume the
next parameter from the supplied commandline parameters. If however, the next parameter matches a known long or short
option (with leading single or double hyphens), that will take precedence, e.g. -b
in the above example.
Option arguments may also be specified using the annotation style. Here is an interface option specification illustrating such a definition:
interface WithArgsI {
@Option boolean a()
@Option String b()
@Option(optionalArg=true) String[] c()
@Unparsed List remaining()
}
And here is how it is used:
def cli = new CliBuilder()
def options = cli.parseFromSpec(WithArgsI, '-a -b foo -c bar baz'.split())
assert options.a()
assert options.b() == 'foo'
assert options.c() == ['bar']
assert options.remaining() == ['baz']
options = cli.parseFromSpec(WithArgsI, '-a -c -b foo bar baz'.split())
assert options.a()
assert options.c() == []
assert options.b() == 'foo'
assert options.remaining() == ['bar', 'baz']
This example makes use of an array-typed option specification. We cover this in more detail shortly when we discuss multiple arguments.
Arguments on the commandline are by nature Strings (or arguably can be considered Booleans for flags) but can be converted to richer types automatically by supplying additional typing information. For the annotation-based argument definition style, these types are supplied using the field types for annotation properties or return types of annotated methods (or the setter argument type for setter methods). For the dynamic method style of argument definition a special 'type' property is supported which allows you to specify a Class name.
When an explicit type is defined, the args
named-parameter is assumed to be 1 (except for Boolean-typed
options where it is 0 by default). An explicit args
parameter can still be provided if needed.
Here is an example using types with the dynamic api argument definition style:
def argz = '''-a John -b -d 21 -e 1980 -f 3.5 -g 3.14159
-h cv.txt -i DOWN and some more'''.split()
def cli = new CliBuilder()
cli.a(type: String, 'a-arg')
cli.b(type: boolean, 'b-arg')
cli.c(type: Boolean, 'c-arg')
cli.d(type: int, 'd-arg')
cli.e(type: Long, 'e-arg')
cli.f(type: Float, 'f-arg')
cli.g(type: BigDecimal, 'g-arg')
cli.h(type: File, 'h-arg')
cli.i(type: RoundingMode, 'i-arg')
def options = cli.parse(argz)
assert options.a == 'John'
assert options.b
assert !options.c
assert options.d == 21
assert options.e == 1980L
assert options.f == 3.5f
assert options.g == 3.14159
assert options.h == new File('cv.txt')
assert options.i == RoundingMode.DOWN
assert options.arguments() == ['and', 'some', 'more']
Primitives, numeric types, files, enums and arrays thereof, are supported (they are converted using StringGroovyMethods#asType(String, Class)).
If the supported types aren’t sufficient, you can supply a closure to handle the String to rich type conversion for you. Here is a sample using the dynamic api style:
def argz = '''-a John -b Mary -d 2016-01-01 and some more'''.split()
def cli = new CliBuilder()
def lower = { it.toLowerCase() }
cli.a(convert: lower, 'a-arg')
cli.b(convert: { it.toUpperCase() }, 'b-arg')
cli.d(convert: { Date.parse('yyyy-MM-dd', it) }, 'd-arg')
def options = cli.parse(argz)
assert options.a == 'john'
assert options.b == 'MARY'
assert options.d.format('dd-MM-yyyy') == '01-01-2016'
assert options.arguments() == ['and', 'some', 'more']
Alternatively, you can use the annotation style by supplying the conversion closure as an annotation parameter. Here is an example specification:
interface WithConvertI {
@Option(convert={ it.toLowerCase() }) String a()
@Option(convert={ it.toUpperCase() }) String b()
@Option(convert={ Date.parse("yyyy-MM-dd", it) }) Date d()
@Unparsed List remaining()
}
And an example using that specification:
Date newYears = Date.parse("yyyy-MM-dd", "2016-01-01")
def argz = '''-a John -b Mary -d 2016-01-01 and some more'''.split()
def cli = new CliBuilder()
def options = cli.parseFromSpec(WithConvertI, argz)
assert options.a() == 'john'
assert options.b() == 'MARY'
assert options.d() == newYears
assert options.remaining() == ['and', 'some', 'more']
Multiple arguments are also supported using an args
value greater than 1. There is a special named parameter,
valueSeparator
, which can also be optionally used when processing multiple arguments. It allows some additional
flexibility in the syntax supported when supplying such argument lists on the commandline. For example,
supplying a value separator of ',' allows a comma-delimited list of values to be passed on the commandline.
The args
value is normally an integer. It can be optionally supplied as a String. There are two special
String symbols: +
and *
.
The *
value means 0 or more. The +
value means 1 or more.
The *
value is the same as using +
and also setting the optionalArg
value to true.
Accessing the multiple arguments follows a special convention. Simply add an 's' to the normal property
you would use to access the argument option and you will retrieve all the supplied arguments as a list.
So, for a short option named 'a', you access the first 'a' argument using options.a
and the list of
all arguments using options.as
. It’s fine to have a shortname or longname ending in 's' so long as you
don’t also have the singular variant without the 's'. So, if name
is one of your options with multiple arguments
and guess
is another with a single argument, there will be no confusion using options.names
and options.guess
.
Here is an excerpt highlighting the use of multiple arguments:
// import CliBuilder not shown
def cli = new CliBuilder()
cli.a(args: 2, 'a-arg')
cli.b(args: '2', valueSeparator: ',', 'b-arg') (1)
cli.c(args: '+', valueSeparator: ',', 'c-arg') (2)
def options = cli.parse('-a 1 2 3 4'.split()) (3)
assert options.a == '1' (4)
assert options.as == ['1', '2'] (5)
assert options.arguments() == ['3', '4']
options = cli.parse('-a1 -a2 3'.split()) (6)
assert options.as == ['1', '2']
assert options.arguments() == ['3']
options = cli.parse(['-b1,2']) (7)
assert options.bs == ['1', '2']
options = cli.parse(['-c', '1'])
assert options.cs == ['1']
options = cli.parse(['-c1'])
assert options.cs == ['1']
options = cli.parse(['-c1,2,3'])
assert options.cs == ['1', '2', '3']
1 | Args value supplied as a String and comma value separator specified |
2 | One or more arguments are allowed |
3 | Two commandline parameters will be supplied as the 'b' option’s list of arguments |
4 | Access the 'a' option’s first argument |
5 | Access the 'a' option’s list of arguments |
6 | An alternative syntax for specifying two arguments for the 'a' option |
7 | The arguments to the 'b' option supplied as a comma-separated value |
As an alternative to accessing multiple arguments using the plural name approach, you can use an array-based type for the option. In this case, all options will always be returned via the array which is accessed via the normal singular name. We’ll see an example of this next when discussing types.
Multiple arguments are also supported using the annotation style of option definition by using an array type for the annotated class member (method or property) as this example shows:
interface ValSepI {
@Option(numberOfArguments=2) String[] a()
@Option(numberOfArgumentsString='2', valueSeparator=',') String[] b()
@Option(numberOfArgumentsString='+', valueSeparator=',') String[] c()
@Unparsed remaining()
}
And used as follows:
def cli = new CliBuilder()
def options = cli.parseFromSpec(ValSepI, '-a 1 2 3 4'.split())
assert options.a() == ['1', '2']
assert options.remaining() == ['3', '4']
options = cli.parseFromSpec(ValSepI, '-a1 -a2 3'.split())
assert options.a() == ['1', '2']
assert options.remaining() == ['3']
options = cli.parseFromSpec(ValSepI, ['-b1,2'] as String[])
assert options.b() == ['1', '2']
options = cli.parseFromSpec(ValSepI, ['-c', '1'] as String[])
assert options.c() == ['1']
options = cli.parseFromSpec(ValSepI, ['-c1'] as String[])
assert options.c() == ['1']
options = cli.parseFromSpec(ValSepI, ['-c1,2,3'] as String[])
assert options.c() == ['1', '2', '3']
Here is an example using types and multiple arguments with the dynamic api argument definition style:
def argz = '''-j 3 4 5 -k1.5,2.5,3.5 and some more'''.split()
def cli = new CliBuilder()
cli.j(args: 3, type: int[], 'j-arg')
cli.k(args: '+', valueSeparator: ',', type: BigDecimal[], 'k-arg')
def options = cli.parse(argz)
assert options.js == [3, 4, 5] (1)
assert options.j == [3, 4, 5] (1)
assert options.k == [1.5, 2.5, 3.5]
assert options.arguments() == ['and', 'some', 'more']
1 | For an array type, the trailing 's' can be used but isn’t needed |
Groovy makes it easy using the Elvis operator to provide a default value at the point of usage of some variable,
e.g. String x = someVariable ?: 'some default'
. But sometimes you wish to make such a default part of the
options specification to minimise the interrogators work in later stages. CliBuilder
supports the defaultValue
property to cater for this scenario.
Here is how you could use it using the dynamic api style:
def cli = new CliBuilder()
cli.f longOpt: 'from', type: String, args: 1, defaultValue: 'one', 'f option'
cli.t longOpt: 'to', type: int, defaultValue: '35', 't option'
def options = cli.parse('-f two'.split())
assert options.hasOption('f')
assert options.f == 'two'
assert !options.hasOption('t')
assert options.t == 35
options = cli.parse('-t 45'.split())
assert !options.hasOption('from')
assert options.from == 'one'
assert options.hasOption('to')
assert options.to == 45
Similarly, you might want such a specification using the annotation style. Here is an example using an interface specification:
interface WithDefaultValueI {
@Option(shortName='f', defaultValue='one') String from()
@Option(shortName='t', defaultValue='35') int to()
}
Which would be used like this:
def cli = new CliBuilder()
def options = cli.parseFromSpec(WithDefaultValueI, '-f two'.split())
assert options.from() == 'two'
assert options.to() == 35
options = cli.parseFromSpec(WithDefaultValueI, '-t 45'.split())
assert options.from() == 'one'
assert options.to() == 45
You can also use the defaultValue
annotation attribute when using annotations with an instance,
though it’s probably just as easy to provide an initial value for the property (or backing field).
TypeChecked
The dynamic api style of using CliBuilder
is inherently dynamic but you have a few options
should you want to make use of Groovy’s static type checking capabilities. Firstly, consider using the
annotation style, for example, here is an interface option specification:
interface TypeCheckedI{
@Option String name()
@Option int age()
@Unparsed List remaining()
}
And it can be used in combination with @TypeChecked
as shown here:
@TypeChecked
void testTypeCheckedInterface() {
def argz = "--name John --age 21 and some more".split()
def cli = new CliBuilder()
def options = cli.parseFromSpec(TypeCheckedI, argz)
String n = options.name()
int a = options.age()
assert n == 'John' && a == 21
assert options.remaining() == ['and', 'some', 'more']
}
Secondly, there is a feature of the dynamic api style which offers some support. The definition statements
are inherently dynamic but actually return a value which we have ignored in earlier examples.
The returned value is in fact a TypedOption<Type>
and special getAt
support allows the options
to be interrogated using the typed option, e.g. options[savedTypeOption]
. So, if you have statements
similar to these in a non type checked part of your code:
def cli = new CliBuilder()
TypedOption<Integer> age = cli.a(longOpt: 'age', type: Integer, 'some age option')
Then, the following statements can be in a separate part of your code which is type checked:
def args = '--age 21'.split()
def options = cli.parse(args)
int a = options[age]
assert a == 21
Finally, there is one additional convenience method offered by CliBuilder
to even allow the
definition part to be type checked. It is a slightly more verbose method call. Instead of using
the short name (the opt name) in the method call, you use a fixed name of option
and
supply the opt
value as a property. You must also specify the type directly as shown in
the following example:
import groovy.cli.TypedOption
import groovy.transform.TypeChecked
@TypeChecked
void testTypeChecked() {
def cli = new CliBuilder()
TypedOption<String> name = cli.option(String, opt: 'n', longOpt: 'name', 'name option')
TypedOption<Integer> age = cli.option(Integer, longOpt: 'age', 'age option')
def argz = "--name John --age 21 and some more".split()
def options = cli.parse(argz)
String n = options[name]
int a = options[age]
assert n == 'John' && a == 21
assert options.arguments() == ['and', 'some', 'more']
}
NOTE Advanced CLI features
|
As an example, here is some code for making use of Apache Commons CLI’s grouping mechanism:
import org.apache.commons.cli.*
def cli = new CliBuilder()
cli.f longOpt: 'from', 'f option'
cli.u longOpt: 'until', 'u option'
def optionGroup = new OptionGroup()
optionGroup.with {
addOption cli.option('o', [longOpt: 'output'], 'o option')
addOption cli.option('d', [longOpt: 'directory'], 'd option')
}
cli.options.addOptionGroup optionGroup
assert !cli.parse('-d -o'.split()) (1)
1 | The parse will fail since only one option from a group can be used at a time. |
Below are some features available in the picocli version of CliBuilder
.
New property: errorWriter
When users of your application give invalid command line arguments,
CliBuilder writes an error message and the usage help message to the stderr
output stream.
It doesn’t use the stdout
stream to prevent the error message from being parsed when your program’s
output is used as input for another process.
You can customize the destination by setting the errorWriter
to a different value.
On the other hand, CliBuilder.usage()
prints the usage help message to the stdout
stream.
This way, when users request help (e.g. with a --help
parameter),
they can pipe the output to a utility like less
or grep
.
You can specify different writers for testing.
Be aware that for backwards compatibility, setting the writer
property to a different value
will set both the writer
and the errorWriter
to the specified writer.
ANSI colors
The picocli version of CliBuilder renders the usage help message in ANSI colors on supported platforms automatically. If desired you can customize this. (An example follows below.)
New property: name
As before, you can set the synopsis of the usage help message with the usage
property.
You may be interested in a small improvement:
if you only set the command name
, a synopsis will be generated automatically,
with repeating elements followed by …
and optional elements surrounded with [
and ]
.
(An example follows below.)
New property: usageMessage
This property exposes a UsageMessageSpec
object from the underlying picocli library,
which gives fine-grained control over various sections of the usage help message. For example:
def cli = new CliBuilder()
cli.name = "myapp"
cli.usageMessage.with {
headerHeading("@|bold,underline Header heading:|@%n")
header("Header 1", "Header 2") // before the synopsis
synopsisHeading("%n@|bold,underline Usage:|@ ")
descriptionHeading("%n@|bold,underline Description heading:|@%n")
description("Description 1", "Description 2") // after the synopsis
optionListHeading("%n@|bold,underline Options heading:|@%n")
footerHeading("%n@|bold,underline Footer heading:|@%n")
footer("Footer 1", "Footer 2")
}
cli.a('option a description')
cli.b('option b description')
cli.c(args: '*', 'option c description')
cli.usage()
Gives this output:
Property: parser
The parser
property gives access to the picocli ParserSpec
object that can be used to customize the parser behavior.
This can be useful when the CliBuilder
options to control the parser are not fine-grained enough.
For example, for backward compatibility with the Commons CLI implementation of CliBuilder
, by default CliBuilder
stops looking for options when an unknown option is encountered, and subsequent command line arguments are treated as positional parameters.
CliBuilder
provides a stopAtNonOption
property, and by setting this to false
you can make the parser more strict, so an unknown option results in error: Unknown option: '-x'
.
But what if you want to treat unknown options as positional parameters, and still process subsequent command line arguments as options?
This can be accomplished with the parser
property.
For example:
def cli = new CliBuilder()
cli.parser.stopAtPositional(false)
cli.parser.unmatchedOptionsArePositionalParams(true)
// ...
def opts = cli.parse(args)
// ...
See the documentation for details.
Map options
Finally, if your application has options that are key-value pairs, you may be interested in picocli’s support for maps. For example:
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit
import static java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.DAYS
import static java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.HOURS
def cli = new CliBuilder()
cli.D(args: 2, valueSeparator: '=', 'the old way') (1)
cli.X(type: Map, 'the new way') (2)
cli.Z(type: Map, auxiliaryTypes: [TimeUnit, Integer].toArray(), 'typed map') (3)
def options = cli.parse('-Da=b -Dc=d -Xx=y -Xi=j -ZDAYS=2 -ZHOURS=23'.split())(4)
assert options.Ds == ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'] (5)
assert options.Xs == [ 'x':'y', 'i':'j' ] (6)
assert options.Zs == [ (DAYS as TimeUnit):2, (HOURS as TimeUnit):23 ] (7)
1 | Previously, key=value pairs were split up into parts and added to a list |
2 | Picocli map support: simply specify Map as the type of the option |
3 | You can even specify the type of the map elements |
4 | To compare, let’s specify two key-value pairs for each option |
5 | Previously, all key-value pairs end up in a list and it is up to the application to work with this list |
6 | Picocli returns the key-value pairs as a Map |
7 | Both keys and values of the map can be strongly typed |
Controlling the Picocli version
To use a specific version of picocli, add a dependency to that version in your build configuration.
If running scripts using a pre-installed version of Groovy, use the @Grab
annotation to control the version of picocli to use in CliBuilder
.
@GrabConfig(systemClassLoader=true)
@Grab('info.picocli:picocli:4.2.0')
import groovy.cli.picocli.CliBuilder
def cli = new CliBuilder()
ObjectGraphBuilder
ObjectGraphBuilder
is a builder for an arbitrary graph of beans that
follow the JavaBean convention. It is in particular useful for creating test data.
Let’s start with a list of classes that belong to your domain:
package com.acme
class Company {
String name
Address address
List employees = []
}
class Address {
String line1
String line2
int zip
String state
}
class Employee {
String name
int employeeId
Address address
Company company
}
Then using ObjectGraphBuilder
building a Company
with three employees is as
easy as:
def builder = new ObjectGraphBuilder() (1)
builder.classLoader = this.class.classLoader (2)
builder.classNameResolver = "com.acme" (3)
def acme = builder.company(name: 'ACME') { (4)
3.times {
employee(id: it.toString(), name: "Drone $it") { (5)
address(line1:"Post street") (6)
}
}
}
assert acme != null
assert acme instanceof Company
assert acme.name == 'ACME'
assert acme.employees.size() == 3
def employee = acme.employees[0]
assert employee instanceof Employee
assert employee.name == 'Drone 0'
assert employee.address instanceof Address
1 | creates a new object graph builder |
2 | sets the classloader where the classes will be resolved |
3 | sets the base package name for classes to be resolved |
4 | creates a Company instance |
5 | with 3 Employee instances |
6 | each of them having a distinct Address |
Behind the scenes, the object graph builder:
-
will try to match a node name into a
Class
, using a defaultClassNameResolver
strategy that requires a package name -
then will create an instance of the appropriate class using a default
NewInstanceResolver
strategy that calls a no-arg constructor -
resolves the parent/child relationship for nested nodes, involving two other strategies:
-
RelationNameResolver
will yield the name of the child property in the parent, and the name of the parent property in the child (if any, in this case,Employee
has a parent property aptly namedcompany
) -
ChildPropertySetter
will insert the child into the parent taking into account if the child belongs to aCollection
or not (in this caseemployees
should be a list ofEmployee
instances inCompany
).
-
All 4 strategies have a default implementation that work as expected if the code follows the usual conventions for writing JavaBeans. In case any of your beans or objects do not follow the convention you may plug your own implementation of each strategy. For example imagine that you need to build a class which is immutable:
@Immutable
class Person {
String name
int age
}
Then if you try to create a Person
with the builder:
def person = builder.person(name:'Jon', age:17)
It will fail at runtime with:
Cannot set readonly property: name for class: com.acme.Person
Fixing this can be done by changing the new instance strategy:
builder.newInstanceResolver = { Class klazz, Map attributes ->
if (klazz.getConstructor(Map)) {
def o = klazz.newInstance(attributes)
attributes.clear()
return o
}
klazz.newInstance()
}
ObjectGraphBuilder
supports ids per node, meaning
that you can store a reference to a node in the builder. This is
useful when multiple objects reference the same instance. Because a
property named id
may be of business meaning in some domain models
ObjectGraphBuilder
has a strategy named IdentifierResolver
that you
may configure to change the default name value. The same may
happen with the property used for referencing a previously saved
instance, a strategy named ReferenceResolver
will yield the
appropriate value (default is `refId'):
def company = builder.company(name: 'ACME') {
address(id: 'a1', line1: '123 Groovy Rd', zip: 12345, state: 'JV') (1)
employee(name: 'Duke', employeeId: 1, address: a1) (2)
employee(name: 'John', employeeId: 2 ){
address( refId: 'a1' ) (3)
}
}
1 | an address can be created with an id |
2 | an employee can reference the address directly with its id |
3 | or use the refId attribute corresponding to the id of the corresponding address |
Its worth mentioning that you cannot modify the properties of a referenced bean.
JmxBuilder
See Working with JMX - JmxBuilder for details.
FileTreeBuilder
FileTreeBuilder is a builder for generating a file directory structure from a specification. For example, to create the following tree:
src/ |--- main | |--- groovy | |--- Foo.groovy |--- test |--- groovy |--- FooTest.groovy
You can use a FileTreeBuilder
like this:
tmpDir = File.createTempDir()
def fileTreeBuilder = new FileTreeBuilder(tmpDir)
fileTreeBuilder.dir('src') {
dir('main') {
dir('groovy') {
file('Foo.groovy', 'println "Hello"')
}
}
dir('test') {
dir('groovy') {
file('FooTest.groovy', 'class FooTest extends groovy.test.GroovyTestCase {}')
}
}
}
To check that everything worked as expected we use the following `assert`s:
assert new File(tmpDir, '/src/main/groovy/Foo.groovy').text == 'println "Hello"'
assert new File(tmpDir, '/src/test/groovy/FooTest.groovy').text == 'class FooTest extends groovy.test.GroovyTestCase {}'
FileTreeBuilder
also supports a shorthand syntax:
tmpDir = File.createTempDir()
def fileTreeBuilder = new FileTreeBuilder(tmpDir)
fileTreeBuilder.src {
main {
groovy {
'Foo.groovy'('println "Hello"')
}
}
test {
groovy {
'FooTest.groovy'('class FooTest extends groovy.test.GroovyTestCase {}')
}
}
}
This produces the same directory structure as above, as shown by these `assert`s:
assert new File(tmpDir, '/src/main/groovy/Foo.groovy').text == 'println "Hello"'
assert new File(tmpDir, '/src/test/groovy/FooTest.groovy').text == 'class FooTest extends groovy.test.GroovyTestCase {}'
3.16. Working with JMX
3.16.1. Introduction
Given that Groovy sits directly on top of Java, Groovy can leverage the tremendous amount of work already done for JMX with Java. In addition, Groovy provides a GroovyMBean
class which makes an MBean look like a normal Groovy object. This simplifies Groovy code for interacting with MBeans. For example, the following code:
println server.getAttribute(beanName, 'Age')
server.setAttribute(beanName, new Attribute('Name', 'New name'))
Object[] params = [5, 20]
String[] signature = [Integer.TYPE, Integer.TYPE]
println server.invoke(beanName, 'add', params, signature)
can be simplified to:
def mbean = new GroovyMBean(server, beanName)
println mbean.Age
mbean.Name = 'New name'
println mbean.add(5, 20)
The remainder of this page shows you how to:
-
Monitor the JVM using MXBeans
-
Monitor Apache Tomcat and display statistics
-
Monitor Oracle OC4J and display information
-
Monitor BEA WebLogic and display information
-
Leverage Spring’s MBean annotation support to export your Groovy beans as MBeans
3.16.2. Monitoring the JVM
MBeans are not accessed directly by an application but are managed by a repository called an MBean server. Java includes a special MBean server called the platform MBean server, which is built into the JVM. Platform MBeans are registered in this server using unique names.
You can monitor the JVM through its platform MBeans with the following code:
import java.lang.management.*
def os = ManagementFactory.operatingSystemMXBean
println """OPERATING SYSTEM:
\tarchitecture = $os.arch
\tname = $os.name
\tversion = $os.version
\tprocessors = $os.availableProcessors
"""
def rt = ManagementFactory.runtimeMXBean
println """RUNTIME:
\tname = $rt.name
\tspec name = $rt.specName
\tvendor = $rt.specVendor
\tspec version = $rt.specVersion
\tmanagement spec version = $rt.managementSpecVersion
"""
def cl = ManagementFactory.classLoadingMXBean
println """CLASS LOADING SYSTEM:
\tisVerbose = ${cl.isVerbose()}
\tloadedClassCount = $cl.loadedClassCount
\ttotalLoadedClassCount = $cl.totalLoadedClassCount
\tunloadedClassCount = $cl.unloadedClassCount
"""
def comp = ManagementFactory.compilationMXBean
println """COMPILATION:
\ttotalCompilationTime = $comp.totalCompilationTime
"""
def mem = ManagementFactory.memoryMXBean
def heapUsage = mem.heapMemoryUsage
def nonHeapUsage = mem.nonHeapMemoryUsage
println """MEMORY:
HEAP STORAGE:
\tcommitted = $heapUsage.committed
\tinit = $heapUsage.init
\tmax = $heapUsage.max
\tused = $heapUsage.used
NON-HEAP STORAGE:
\tcommitted = $nonHeapUsage.committed
\tinit = $nonHeapUsage.init
\tmax = $nonHeapUsage.max
\tused = $nonHeapUsage.used
"""
ManagementFactory.memoryPoolMXBeans.each { mp ->
println "\tname: " + mp.name
String[] mmnames = mp.memoryManagerNames
mmnames.each{ mmname ->
println "\t\tManager Name: $mmname"
}
println "\t\tmtype = $mp.type"
println "\t\tUsage threshold supported = " + mp.isUsageThresholdSupported()
}
println()
def td = ManagementFactory.threadMXBean
println "THREADS:"
td.allThreadIds.each { tid ->
println "\tThread name = ${td.getThreadInfo(tid).threadName}"
}
println()
println "GARBAGE COLLECTION:"
ManagementFactory.garbageCollectorMXBeans.each { gc ->
println "\tname = $gc.name"
println "\t\tcollection count = $gc.collectionCount"
println "\t\tcollection time = $gc.collectionTime"
String[] mpoolNames = gc.memoryPoolNames
mpoolNames.each { mpoolName ->
println "\t\tmpool name = $mpoolName"
}
}
When run, you will see something like this:
OPERATING SYSTEM: architecture = x86 name = Windows XP version = 5.1 processors = 2 RUNTIME: name = 620@LYREBIRD spec name = Java Virtual Machine Specification vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc. spec version = 1.0 management spec version = 1.0 CLASS LOADING SYSTEM: isVerbose = false loadedClassCount = 919 totalLoadedClassCount = 919 unloadedClassCount = 0 COMPILATION: totalCompilationTime = 91 MEMORY: HEAP STORAGE: committed = 3108864 init = 0 max = 66650112 used = 1994728 NON-HEAP STORAGE: committed = 9240576 init = 8585216 max = 100663296 used = 5897880 name: Code Cache Manager Name: CodeCacheManager mtype = Non-heap memory Usage threshold supported = true name: Eden Space Manager Name: MarkSweepCompact Manager Name: Copy mtype = Heap memory Usage threshold supported = false name: Survivor Space Manager Name: MarkSweepCompact Manager Name: Copy mtype = Heap memory Usage threshold supported = false name: Tenured Gen Manager Name: MarkSweepCompact mtype = Heap memory Usage threshold supported = true name: Perm Gen Manager Name: MarkSweepCompact mtype = Non-heap memory Usage threshold supported = true THREADS: Thread name = Monitor Ctrl-Break Thread name = Signal Dispatcher Thread name = Finalizer Thread name = Reference Handler Thread name = main GARBAGE COLLECTION: name = Copy collection count = 60 collection time = 141 mpool name = Eden Space mpool name = Survivor Space name = MarkSweepCompact collection count = 0 collection time = 0 mpool name = Eden Space mpool name = Survivor Space mpool name = Tenured Gen mpool name = Perm Gen
3.16.3. Monitoring Tomcat
First start up Tomcat with JMX monitoring enabled by setting the following:
set JAVA_OPTS=-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.port=9004\
-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.authenticate=false -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.ssl=false
You can do this in your startup script and may choose any available port, we used 9004.
The following code uses JMX to discover the available MBeans in the running Tomcat, determine which are web modules, extract the processing time for each web module and displays the result in a graph using JFreeChart:
import groovy.swing.SwingBuilder
import javax.management.ObjectName
import javax.management.remote.JMXConnectorFactory as JmxFactory
import javax.management.remote.JMXServiceURL as JmxUrl
import javax.swing.WindowConstants as WC
import org.jfree.chart.ChartFactory
import org.jfree.data.category.DefaultCategoryDataset as Dataset
import org.jfree.chart.plot.PlotOrientation as Orientation
def serverUrl = 'service:jmx:rmi:///jndi/rmi://localhost:9004/jmxrmi'
def server = JmxFactory.connect(new JmxUrl(serverUrl)).MBeanServerConnection
def serverInfo = new GroovyMBean(server, 'Catalina:type=Server').serverInfo
println "Connected to: $serverInfo"
def query = new ObjectName('Catalina:*')
String[] allNames = server.queryNames(query, null)
def modules = allNames.findAll { name ->
name.contains('j2eeType=WebModule')
}.collect{ new GroovyMBean(server, it) }
println "Found ${modules.size()} web modules. Processing ..."
def dataset = new Dataset()
modules.each { m ->
println m.name()
dataset.addValue m.processingTime, 0, m.path
}
def labels = ['Time per Module', 'Module', 'Time']
def options = [false, true, true]
def chart = ChartFactory.createBarChart(*labels, dataset,
Orientation.VERTICAL, *options)
def swing = new SwingBuilder()
def frame = swing.frame(title:'Catalina Module Processing Time', defaultCloseOperation:WC.EXIT_ON_CLOSE) {
panel(id:'canvas') { rigidArea(width:600, height:250) }
}
frame.pack()
frame.show()
chart.draw(swing.canvas.graphics, swing.canvas.bounds)
When run, we will see a trace of progress being made:
Connected to: Apache Tomcat/6.0.13 Found 5 web modules. Processing ... Catalina:j2eeType=WebModule,name=//localhost/,J2EEApplication=none,J2EEServer=none Catalina:j2eeType=WebModule,name=//localhost/host-manager,J2EEApplication=none,J2EEServer=none Catalina:j2eeType=WebModule,name=//localhost/docs,J2EEApplication=none,J2EEServer=none Catalina:j2eeType=WebModule,name=//localhost/examples,J2EEApplication=none,J2EEServer=none Catalina:j2eeType=WebModule,name=//localhost/manager,J2EEApplication=none,J2EEServer=none
The output will look like this:
Note: if you get errors running this script, see the Troubleshooting section below.
3.16.4. OC4J Example
Here is a script to access OC4J and print out some information about the server, its runtime and (as an example) the configured JMS destinations:
import javax.management.remote.*
import oracle.oc4j.admin.jmx.remote.api.JMXConnectorConstant
def serverUrl = new JMXServiceURL('service:jmx:rmi://localhost:23791')
def serverPath = 'oc4j:j2eeType=J2EEServer,name=standalone'
def jvmPath = 'oc4j:j2eeType=JVM,name=single,J2EEServer=standalone'
def provider = 'oracle.oc4j.admin.jmx.remote'
def credentials = [
(JMXConnectorConstant.CREDENTIALS_LOGIN_KEY): 'oc4jadmin',
(JMXConnectorConstant.CREDENTIALS_PASSWORD_KEY): 'admin'
]
def env = [
(JMXConnectorFactory.PROTOCOL_PROVIDER_PACKAGES): provider,
(JMXConnector.CREDENTIALS): credentials
]
def server = JmxFactory.connect(serverUrl, env).MBeanServerConnection
def serverInfo = new GroovyMBean(server, serverPath)
def jvmInfo = new GroovyMBean(server, jvmPath)
println """Connected to $serverInfo.node. \
Server started ${new Date(serverInfo.startTime)}.
OC4J version: $serverInfo.serverVersion from $serverInfo.serverVendor
JVM version: $jvmInfo.javaVersion from $jvmInfo.javaVendor
Memory usage: $jvmInfo.freeMemory bytes free, \
$jvmInfo.totalMemory bytes total
"""
def query = new javax.management.ObjectName('oc4j:*')
String[] allNames = server.queryNames(query, null)
def dests = allNames.findAll { name ->
name.contains('j2eeType=JMSDestinationResource')
}.collect { new GroovyMBean(server, it) }
println "Found ${dests.size()} JMS destinations. Listing ..."
dests.each { d -> println "$d.name: $d.location" }
Here is the result of running this script:
Connected to LYREBIRD. Server started Thu May 31 21:04:54 EST 2007. OC4J version: 11.1.1.0.0 from Oracle Corp. JVM version: 1.6.0_01 from Sun Microsystems Inc. Memory usage: 8709976 bytes free, 25153536 bytes total Found 5 JMS destinations. Listing ... Demo Queue: jms/demoQueue Demo Topic: jms/demoTopic jms/Oc4jJmsExceptionQueue: jms/Oc4jJmsExceptionQueue jms/RAExceptionQueue: jms/RAExceptionQueue OracleASRouter_store: OracleASRouter_store
As a slight variation, this script displays a pie chart of memory usage using JFreeChart:
import org.jfree.chart.ChartFactory
import javax.swing.WindowConstants as WC
import javax.management.remote.*
import oracle.oc4j.admin.jmx.remote.api.JMXConnectorConstant
def url = 'service:jmx:rmi://localhost:23791'
def credentials = [:]
credentials[JMXConnectorConstant.CREDENTIALS_LOGIN_KEY] = "oc4jadmin"
credentials[JMXConnectorConstant.CREDENTIALS_PASSWORD_KEY] = "password"
def env = [:]
env[JMXConnectorFactory.PROTOCOL_PROVIDER_PACKAGES] = "oracle.oc4j.admin.jmx.remote"
env[JMXConnector.CREDENTIALS] = credentials
def server = JMXConnectorFactory.connect(new JMXServiceURL(url), env).MBeanServerConnection
def jvmInfo = new GroovyMBean(server, 'oc4j:j2eeType=JVM,name=single,J2EEServer=standalone')
def piedata = new org.jfree.data.general.DefaultPieDataset()
piedata.setValue "Free", jvmInfo.freeMemory
piedata.setValue "Used", jvmInfo.totalMemory - jvmInfo.freeMemory
def options = [true, true, true]
def chart = ChartFactory.createPieChart('OC4J Memory Usage', piedata, *options)
chart.backgroundPaint = java.awt.Color.white
def swing = new groovy.swing.SwingBuilder()
def frame = swing.frame(title:'OC4J Memory Usage', defaultCloseOperation:WC.EXIT_ON_CLOSE) {
panel(id:'canvas') { rigidArea(width:350, height:250) }
}
frame.pack()
frame.show()
chart.draw(swing.canvas.graphics, swing.canvas.bounds)
Which looks like:
3.16.5. WebLogic Example
This script prints out information about the server followed by information about JMS Destinations (as an example). Many other mbeans are available.
import javax.management.remote.*
import javax.management.*
import javax.naming.Context
def urlRuntime = '/jndi/weblogic.management.mbeanservers.runtime'
def urlBase = 'service:jmx:t3://localhost:7001'
def serviceURL = new JMXServiceURL(urlBase + urlRuntime)
def h = new Hashtable()
h.put(Context.SECURITY_PRINCIPAL, 'weblogic')
h.put(Context.SECURITY_CREDENTIALS, 'weblogic')
h.put(JMXConnectorFactory.PROTOCOL_PROVIDER_PACKAGES, 'weblogic.management.remote')
def server = JMXConnectorFactory.connect(serviceURL, h).MBeanServerConnection
def domainName = new ObjectName('com.bea:Name=RuntimeService,Type=weblogic.management.mbeanservers.runtime.RuntimeServiceMBean')
def rtName = server.getAttribute(domainName, 'ServerRuntime')
def rt = new GroovyMBean(server, rtName)
println "Server: name=$rt.Name, state=$rt.State, version=$rt.WeblogicVersion"
def destFilter = Query.match(Query.attr('Type'), Query.value('JMSDestinationRuntime'))
server.queryNames(new ObjectName('com.bea:*'), destFilter).each { name ->
def jms = new GroovyMBean(server, name)
println "JMS Destination: name=$jms.Name, type=$jms.DestinationType, messages=$jms.MessagesReceivedCount"
}
Here is the output:
Server: name=examplesServer, state=RUNNING, version=WebLogic Server 10.0 Wed May 9 18:10:27 EDT 2007 933139 JMS Destination: name=examples-jms!exampleTopic, type=Topic, messages=0 JMS Destination: name=examples-jms!exampleQueue, type=Queue, messages=0 JMS Destination: name=examples-jms!jms/MULTIDATASOURCE_MDB_QUEUE, type=Queue, messages=0 JMS Destination: name=examplesJMSServer!examplesJMSServer.TemporaryQueue0, type=Queue, messages=68 JMS Destination: name=examples-jms!quotes, type=Topic, messages=0 JMS Destination: name=examples-jms!weblogic.wsee.wseeExamplesDestinationQueue, type=Queue, messages=0 JMS Destination: name=examples-jms!weblogic.examples.ejb30.ExampleQueue, type=Queue, messages=0
3.16.6. Spring Example
You can also use Spring to automatically register beans as JMX aware.
Here is an example class (Calculator.groovy):
import org.springframework.jmx.export.annotation.*
@ManagedResource(objectName="bean:name=calcMBean", description="Calculator MBean")
public class Calculator {
private int invocations
@ManagedAttribute(description="The Invocation Attribute")
public int getInvocations() {
return invocations
}
private int base = 10
@ManagedAttribute(description="The Base to use when adding strings")
public int getBase() {
return base
}
@ManagedAttribute(description="The Base to use when adding strings")
public void setBase(int base) {
this.base = base
}
@ManagedOperation(description="Add two numbers")
@ManagedOperationParameters([
@ManagedOperationParameter(name="x", description="The first number"),
@ManagedOperationParameter(name="y", description="The second number")])
public int add(int x, int y) {
invocations++
return x + y
}
@ManagedOperation(description="Add two strings representing numbers of a particular base")
@ManagedOperationParameters([
@ManagedOperationParameter(name="x", description="The first number"),
@ManagedOperationParameter(name="y", description="The second number")])
public String addStrings(String x, String y) {
invocations++
def result = Integer.valueOf(x, base) + Integer.valueOf(y, base)
return Integer.toString(result, base)
}
}
Here is the Spring configuration file (beans.xml):
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans.xsd">
<bean id="mbeanServer"
class="org.springframework.jmx.support.MBeanServerFactoryBean">
<property name="locateExistingServerIfPossible" value="true"/>
</bean>
<bean id="exporter"
class="org.springframework.jmx.export.MBeanExporter">
<property name="assembler" ref="assembler"/>
<property name="namingStrategy" ref="namingStrategy"/>
<property name="beans">
<map>
<entry key="bean:name=defaultCalcName" value-ref="calcBean"/>
</map>
</property>
<property name="server" ref="mbeanServer"/>
<property name="autodetect" value="true"/>
</bean>
<bean id="jmxAttributeSource"
class="org.springframework.jmx.export.annotation.AnnotationJmxAttributeSource"/>
<!-- will create management interface using annotation metadata -->
<bean id="assembler"
class="org.springframework.jmx.export.assembler.MetadataMBeanInfoAssembler">
<property name="attributeSource" ref="jmxAttributeSource"/>
</bean>
<!-- will pick up the ObjectName from the annotation -->
<bean id="namingStrategy"
class="org.springframework.jmx.export.naming.MetadataNamingStrategy">
<property name="attributeSource" ref="jmxAttributeSource"/>
</bean>
<bean id="calcBean"
class="Calculator">
<property name="base" value="10"/>
</bean>
</beans>
Here is a script which uses this bean and configuration:
import org.springframework.context.support.ClassPathXmlApplicationContext
import java.lang.management.ManagementFactory
import javax.management.ObjectName
import javax.management.Attribute
// get normal bean
def ctx = new ClassPathXmlApplicationContext("beans.xml")
def calc = ctx.getBean("calcBean")
Thread.start {
// access bean via JMX, use a separate thread just to
// show that we could access remotely if we wanted
def server = ManagementFactory.platformMBeanServer
def mbean = new GroovyMBean(server, 'bean:name=calcMBean')
sleep 1000
assert 8 == mbean.add(7, 1)
mbean.Base = 8
assert '10' == mbean.addStrings('7', '1')
mbean.Base = 16
sleep 2000
println "Number of invocations: $mbean.Invocations"
println mbean
}
assert 15 == calc.add(9, 6)
assert '11' == calc.addStrings('10', '1')
sleep 2000
assert '20' == calc.addStrings('1f', '1')
And here is the resulting output:
Number of invocations: 5 MBean Name: bean:name=calcMBean Attributes: (rw) int Base (r) int Invocations Operations: int add(int x, int y) java.lang.String addStrings(java.lang.String x, java.lang.String y) int getInvocations() int getBase() void setBase(int p1)
You can even attach to the process while it is running with jconsole. It will look something like:
We started the Groovy application with the -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote
JVM argument.
See also:
3.16.7. Troubleshooting
java.lang.SecurityException
If you get the following error, your container’s JMX access is password protected:
java.lang.SecurityException: Authentication failed! Credentials required
To fix that, add an environment with the credentials when connecting, like this (password has to be set before that):
def jmxEnv = null
if (password != null) {
jmxEnv = [(JMXConnector.CREDENTIALS): (String[])["monitor", password]]
}
def connector = JMXConnectorFactory.connect(new JMXServiceURL(serverUrl), jmxEnv)
Details for the software you are trying to monitor/manage may differ slightly. Check out the other examples using credentials above if appropriate (e.g. OC4J and WebLogic). If you still have troubles, you will have to consult the documentation for the software you are trying to monitor/manage for details on how to provide credentials.
3.16.8. JmxBuilder
JmxBuilder is a Groovy-based domain specific language for the Java Management Extension (JMX) API. It uses the builder pattern (FactoryBuilder) to create an internal DSL that facilitates the exposure of POJO’s and Groovy beans as management components via the MBean server. JmxBuilder hides the complexity of creating and exporting management beans via the JMX API and provides a set of natural Groovy constructs to interact with the JMX infrastructure.
Instantiating JmxBuilder
To start using JmxBuilder, simply make sure the jar file is on your class path. Then you can do the following in your code:
def jmx = new JmxBuilder()
That’s it! You are now ready to use the JmxBuilder.
NOTE
-
You can pass in an instance of your own MBeanServer to the builder (JmxBuilder(MBeanServer))
-
If no MBeanServer is specified, the builder instance will default to the underlying platform MBeanServer.
Once you have an instance of JmxBuilder, you are now ready to invoke any of its builder nodes.
JMX Connectors
Remote connectivity is a crucial part of the JMX architecture. JmxBuilder facilitates the creation of connector servers and connector clients with a minimal amount of coding.
Connector Server
JmxBuilder.connectorServer() supports the full Connector api syntax and will let you specify properties, override the URL, specify your own host, etc.
Syntax
jmx.connectorServer( protocol:"rmi", host:"...", port:1099, url:"...", properties:[ "authenticate":true|false, "passwordFile":"...", "accessFile":"...", "sslEnabled" : true | false // any valid connector property ] )
Note that the serverConnector node will accept four ServerConnector property aliases (authenticate, passwordFile,accessFile, and sslEnabled). You can use these aliases or provided any of the RMI-supported properties.
Example - Connector Server (see correction below)
jmx.connectorServer(port: 9000).start()
The snippet above returns an RMI connector that will start listening on port 9000. By default, the builder will internally generate URL "service:jmx:rmi:///jndi/rmi://localhost:9000/jmxrmi".
NOTE: Sadly you are as likely to get something like the following when attempting to run the previous snippet of code (example is incomplete, see below):
Caught: java.io.IOException: Cannot bind to URL [rmi://localhost:9000/jmxrmi]: javax.naming.ServiceUnavailableException [Root exception is java.rmi.ConnectException: Connection refused to host: localhost; nested exception is: ?????? java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused] ??
This occurs on Mac and Linux (CentOS 5) with Groovy 1.6 installed. Perhaps there were assumptions made about the configuration of the /etc/hosts file?
The correct example is shown below. |
Connector Example (Corrected) - Connector Server
The example above does not create the RMI registry. So, in order to export, you have to first export the RMI object registry (make sure to import java.rmi.registry.LocateRegistry
).
import java.rmi.registry.LocateRegistry
//...
LocateRegistry.createRegistry(9000)
jmx.connectorServer(port: 9000).start()
Connector Client
JmxBuilder.connectorClient() node lets you create JMX connector client object to connect to a JMX MBean Server.
Syntax
jmx.connectorClient ( protocol:"rmi", host:"...", port:1099, url:"...", )
Example - Client Connector
Creating a connector client can be done just as easily. With one line of code, you can create an instance of a JMX Connector Client as shown below.
def client = jmx.connectorClient(port: 9000)
client.connect()
You can then access the MBeanServerConnection associated with the connector using:
client.getMBeanServerConnection()
JmxBuilder MBean Export
You can export a Java object or a Groovy object with minimal coding. JmxBuilder will even find and export dynamic Groovy methods injected at runtime.
Implicit vs Explicit Descriptors
When using the builder, you can let JmxBuilder implicitly generate all of your MBean descriptor info. This is useful when you want to write minimal code to quickly export your beans. You can also explicitly declare all descriptor info for the bean. This gives you total control on how you want to describe every piece of information that you want to export for the underlying bean.
The JmxBuilder.export() Node
The JmxBuilder.export() node provides a container where all management entities to be exported to the MBeanServer are placed. You can place one or more bean() or timer() nodes as children of the export() node. JmxBuilder will automatically batch export the entities described by the nodes to the MBean server for management (see example below).
def beans = jmx.export {
bean(new Foo())
bean(new Bar())
bean(new SomeBar())
}
In the code snippet above, JmxBuilder.export() will export three management beans to the MBean server.
JmxBuilder.export() Syntax
JmxBuilder.export() node supports the registrationPolicy parameter to specify how JmxBuilder will behave to resolve bean name collision during MBean registration:
jmx.export(policy:"replace|ignore|error") or jmx.export(regPolicy:"replace|ignore|error")
-
replace - JmxBuilder.export() will replace any bean already registered with the MBean during export.
-
ignore - The bean being exported will be ignored if the same bean is already registered.
-
error - JmxBuilder.export() throws an error upon bean name collision during registration.
Integration with GroovyMBean Class
When you export an MBean to the MBeanServer, JmxBuilder will return an instance of GroovyMBean representing the management bean that have been exported by the builder. Nodes such as bean() and timer() will return an instances of GroovyMBean when they are invoked. The export() node returns an array of all of GroovyMBean[] representing all managed objects exported to the MBean server.
MBean Registration with JmxBuilder.bean()
This portion of this reference uses class RequestController to illustrate how to use JmxBuilder to export runtime management beans. The class is for illustration purpose and can be a POJO or a Groovy bean.
RequestController
class RequestController {
// constructors
RequestController() { super() }
RequestController(Map resource) { }
// attributes
boolean isStarted() { true }
int getRequestCount() { 0 }
int getResourceCount() { 0 }
void setRequestLimit(int limit) { }
int getRequestLimit() { 0 }
// operations
void start() { }
void stop() { }
void putResource(String name, Object resource) { }
void makeRequest(String res) { }
void makeRequest() { }
}
As mentioned earlier, you can use JmxBuilder’s flexible syntax to export any POJO/POGO with no descriptor. The builder can automatically describe all aspects of the management beans using implicit defaults. These default values can easily be overridden as we’ll see in this in the next section.
The simplest way to export a POJO or POGO is listed below.
jmx.export {
bean(new RequestController(resource: "Hello World"))
}
What this does:
-
First, the JmxBuilder.export() node will export an MBean to the MBeanServer representing the declared POJO instance.
-
The builder will generate a default ObjectName for the MBean and all other MBean descriptor information.
-
JmxBuilder will automatically export all declared attributes (MBean getter/setters), constructors, and operations on the instance.
-
The exported attributes will have read-only visibility.
Remember, JmxBuilder.export() returns an array of GroovyMBean[] objects for all exported instances. So, once you call JmxBuilder.export(), you have immediate access to the underlying MBean proxy (via GroovyMBean).
JmxBuilder.bean() Syntax
The JmxBuilder.bean() node supports an extensive set of descriptors to describe your bean for management. The JMX MBeanServer uses these descriptors to expose meta data about the bean exposed for management.
jmx.export { bean( target:bean instance, name:ObjectName, desc:"...", attributes:"*", attributes:[] attributes:[ "AttrubuteName1","AttributeName2",...,"AttributeName_n" ] attributes:[ "AttributeName":"*", "AttributeName":[ desc:"...", defaultValue:value, writable:true|false, editable:true|false, onChange:{event-> // event handler} ] ], constructors:"*", constructors:[ "Constructor Name":[], "Constructor Name":[ "ParamType1","ParamType2,...,ParamType_n" ], "Constructor Name":[ desc:"...", params:[ "ParamType1":"*", "ParamType2":[desc:"...", name:"..."],..., "ParamType_n":[desc:"...", name:"..."] ] ] ], operations:"*", operations:[ "OperationName1", "OperationName2",...,"OperationNameN" ], operations:[ "OperationName1":"*", "OperationName2":[ "type1","type2,"type3" ] "OperationName3":[ desc:"...", params:[ "ParamType1":"*" "ParamType2":[desc:"...", name:"..."],..., "ParamType_n":[desc:"...", name:"..."] ], onInvoked:{event-> JmxBuilder.send(event:"", to:"")} ] ], listeners:[ "ListenerName1":[event: "...", from:ObjectName, call:{event->}], "ListenerName2":[event: "...", from:ObjectName, call:&methodPointer] ] ) }
Instead of describing the entire node, the following section explore each attribute separately.
Bean() Node - Specifying MBean ObjectName
Using the bean() node descriptors, you can specify your own MBean ObjectName.
def ctrl = new RequestController(resource:"Hello World")
def beans = jmx.export {
bean(target: ctrl, name: "jmx.tutorial:type=Object")
}
The ObjectName can be specified as a String or an instance of the ObjectName.
Bean() Node - Attribute Export
JMX attributes are the setters and getters on the underlying bean. The JmxBuilder.bean() node provides several ways to flexibly describe and export MBean attributes. You can combine them however you want to achieve any level of attribute visibility. Let’s take a look.
Export All Attributes with Wildcard "*"
The following code snippet will describe and export all attributes on the bean as read-only. JmxBuilder will use default values to describe the attributes that exported for management.
def objName = new ObjectName("jmx.tutorial:type=Object")
def beans = jmx.export {
bean(target: new RequestController(),
name: objName,
attributes: "*")
}
Export Attribute List
JmxBuilder will let you specify a list of attributes to export.
def objName = new ObjectName("jmx.tutorial:type=Object")
def beans = jmx.export {
bean(
target: new RequestController(),
name: objName,
attributes: ["Resource", "RequestCount"]
)
}
In the snippet above, only the "Resource" and "RequestCount" attributes will be exported. Again, since no descriptors are provided, JmxBuilder will use sensible defaults to describe the exported attributes.
Export Attribute with Explicit Descriptors
One of the strengths of JmxBuilder is its flexibility in describing MBean. With the builder you can describe all aspects of the MBeans attribute that you want to export to the MBeanServer (see syntax above).
def objName = new ObjectName("jmx.tutorial:type=Object")
def beans = jmx.export {
bean(
target: new RequestController(),
name: objName,
attributes: [
"Resource": [desc: "The resource to request.", readable: true, writable: true, defaultValue: "Hello"],
"RequestCount": "*"
]
)
}
In the snippet above, attribute "Resource" is fully-described using all supported descriptors (i.e. desc, readable, writable, defaultValue) for a JMX attribute. However, we use the wildcard to describe attribute RequestCount and it will be exported and described using defaults.
Bean() Node - Constructor Export
JmxBuilder supports the explicit description and export of constructors defined in the underlying bean. There are several options available when exporting constructors. You can combine them however you want to achieve the desired level of manageability.
Export all Constructors with "*"
You can use the builder’s special "*" notation to export all constructors declared on the underlying bean. The builder will use default values to describe the MBean constructors.
def objName = new ObjectName("jmx.tutorial:type=Object")
def beans = jmx.export {
bean(
target: new RequestController(),
name: objName,
constructors: "*"
)
}
Export Constructors using Parameter Descriptor
JmxBuilder lets you target specific constructor to export by describing the parameter signature. This is useful when you have several constructors with different parameter signature and you want to export specific constructors.
def objName = new ObjectName("jmx.tutorial:type=Object")
def beans = jmx.export {
bean(
target: new RequestController(),
name: objName,
constructors: [
"RequestController": ["Object"]
]
)
}
Here, JmxBuilder will export a constructor that takes one parameter of type "Object". Again, JmxBuilder will use default values to fill in the description of the constructor and the parameters.
Export Constructor with Explicit Descriptors
JmxBuilder allows you to fully-describe the constructor that you want to target for export (see syntax above).
def objName = new ObjectName("jmx.tutorial:type=Object")
def beans = jmx.export {
bean(target: new RequestController(), name: objName,
constructors: [
"RequestController": [
desc: "Constructor takes param",
params: ["Object" : [name: "Resource", desc: "Resource for controller"]]
]
]
)
}
In the code above, JmxBuilder will target a constructor that takes one parameter for export to the MBeanServer. Notice how the constructor can be fully-described using all optional descriptor keys including parameter descriptors.
Bean() Node - Operation Export
Similar to constructors, JmxBuilder supports the description and export of MBean operations using a flexible notation (see above for syntax). You can combine these notations however you want to achieve the level of operation manageability desired.
Export All Operations with "*"
You can use the builder’s special "*" notation to export all operations defined on the bean to be exposed for management. The builder will use default descriptor values for the operations being exported.
def objName = new ObjectName("jmx.tutorial:type=Object")
def beans = jmx.export {
bean(
target: new RequestController(),
name: objName,
operations: "*"
)
}
In this snippet, JmxBuilder will export all bean operations and will use default values to describe them in the MBeanServer.
Export Operation List
JmxBuilder has a shorthand notation that lets you quickly target operations to be exported by providing a list of methods to export.
def objName = new ObjectName("jmx.tutorial:type=Object")
def beans = jmx.export {
bean(
target: new RequestController(),
name: objName,
operations: ["start", "stop"]
)
}
In the snippet above, the builder will only export methods start() and stop(). All other methods will be ignored. JmxBuilder will use default descriptor values to describe the operations being exported.
Export Operations by Signature
Using JmxBuilder, you can target methods to export for management using the methods’s parameter signature. This is useful when you want to distinguish methods with the same name that you want to export (i.e. stop() instead of stop(boolean)).
def objName = new ObjectName("jmx.tutorial:type=Object")
def beans = jmx.export {
bean(
target: new RequestController(),
name: objName,
operations: [
"makeRequest": ["String"]
]
)
}
In the snippet above, JmxBuilder would select method makeRequest(String) to be exported instead of the other version makeRequest() which takes no parameter. In this shorthand context, the signature is specified as a list of type (i.e. "String").
Export Operations with Explicit Descriptors
JmxBuilder supports detailed descriptors for bean operations. You can supply deep descriptor info about any operation on your bean including a name, description, method parameters, parameter type, and parameter description.
def objName = new ObjectName("jmx.tutorial:type=Object")
def beans = jmx.export {
bean(target: new RequestController(), name: objName,
operations: [
"start": [desc: "Starts request controller"],
"stop": [desc: "Stops the request controller"],
"setResource": [params: ["Object"]],
"makeRequest": [
desc: "Executes the request.",
params: [
"String": [name: "Resource", desc: "The resource to request"]
]
]
]
)
}
The snippet above shows all of the ways JmxBuilder allows you to describe an operation targeted for management:
-
Operations start() and stop() are described by the "desc" key (this is enough since there are no params).
-
In operation setResource() uses of a shorthand version of params: to describe the parameters for the method.
-
makeRequest() uses the extended descriptor syntax to describe all aspects of the operation.
Embedding Descriptor
JmxBuilder supports the ability to embed descriptors directly in your Groovy class. So, instead of wrapping your description around the declared object (as we’ve seen here), you can embed your JMX descriptors directly in your class.
RequestControllerGroovy
class RequestControllerGroovy {
// attributes
boolean started
int requestCount
int resourceCount
int requestLimit
Map resources
// operations
void start() { }
void stop(){ }
void putResource(String name, Object resource) { }
void makeRequest(String res) { }
void makeRequest() { }
static descriptor = [
name: "jmx.builder:type=EmbeddedObject",
operations: ["start", "stop", "putResource"],
attributes: "*"
]
}
// export
jmx.export(
bean(new RequestControllerGroovy())
)
There are two things going on in the code above:
-
Groovy class RequestControllerGroovy is defined and includes a static descriptor member. That member is used to declare a JmxBuilder descriptor to describe member of the class targeted for JMX export.
-
The second part of the code shows how to use JmxBuilder to export that class for management.
Timer Export
JMX standards mandate that the implementation of the API makes available a timer service. Since JMX is a component-based architecture, timers provide an excellent signalling mechanism to communicate to registered listener components in the MBeanServer. JmxBuilder supports the creation and export of timers using the same easy syntax we’ve seen so far.
Timer Node Syntax
timer( name:ObjectName, event:"...", message:"...", data:dataValue startDate:"now"|dateValue period:"99d"|"99h"|"99m"|"99s"|99 occurrences:long )
The timer() node supports several attributes:
-
name: - Required The qualified JMX ObjectName instance (or String) for the timer.
-
event: - The JMX event type string that will be broadcast with every timing signal (default "jmx.builder.event").
-
message: - An optional string value that can be sent to listeners.
-
data: - An optional object that can be sent to listeners of timing signal.
-
startDate: - When to start timer. Set of valid values [ "now", date object ]. Default is "now"
-
period: - A timer’s period expressed as either a number of millisecond or time unit (day, hour, minute, second). See description below.
-
occurrences: - A number indicating the number of time to repeat timer. Default is forever.
Exporting a Timer
def timer = jmx.timer(name: "jmx.builder:type=Timer", event: "heartbeat", period: "1s")
timer.start()
This snippet above describes, creates, and exports a standard JMX Timer component. Here, the timer() node returns a GroovyMBean that represents the registered timer MBean in the MBeanServer.
An alternative way of exporting timers is within the JmxBuilder.export() node.
def beans = jmx.export {
timer(name: "jmx.builder:type=Timer1", event: "event.signal", period: "1s")
timer(name: "jmx.builder:type=Timer2", event: "event.log", period: "1s")
}
beans[0].start()
beans[1].start()
Timer Period
The timer() node supports a flexible notation for specifying the timer period values. You can specify the time in second, minutes, hour, and day. The default is millisecond.
-
timer(period: 100) = 100 millisecond
-
timer(period: "1s") = 1 second
-
timer(period: "1m") = 1 minute
-
timer(period: "1h") = 1 hour
-
timer(period: "1d") = 1 day
The node will automatically translate.
JmxBuilder and Events
An integral part of JMX is its event model. Registered management beans can communicate with each other by broadcasting events on the MBeanServer’s event bus. JmxBuilder provides several ways to easily listen and react to events broadcasted on the MBeanServer’s event bus. Developers can capture any event on the bus or throw their own to be consumed by other components registered on the MBeanServer.
Event Handling Closures
JmxBuilder leverages Groovy’s use of closures to provide simple, yet elegant, mean of reacting to JMX events. JmxBuilder supports two closure signatures:
callback = { ->
// event handling code here.
}
JmxBuilder executes the closure and passes no information about the event that was captured on the bus.
callback = { event ->
// event handling code
}
JmxBuilder will pass an "event" object to the closure using this format. The event object contains information about the event was intercepted so that it can be handled by the handler. The parameter will contain different set of info depending on the event that was captured.
Handling Attribute onChange Event
When describing attributes (see bean() node section above), you can provide a closure (or method pointer) for callback to be executed when the value of the attribute is updated on the exported MBean. This gives developers an opportunity to listen to and react to state changes on the MBean.
jmx.export {
bean(
target: new RequestController(), name: "jmx.tutorial:type=Object",
attributes: [
"Resource": [
readable: true, writable: true,
onChange: { e ->
println e.oldValue
println e.newValue
}
]
]
)
}
The sample snippet above shows how to specify an "onChange" callback closure when describing MBean attributes. In this sample code, whenever attribute "Resource" is updated via the exported MBean, the onChange event will be executed.
Attribute onChange Event Object
When handling the attribute onChange event, the handler closure will receive an event object with the following info:
-
event.oldValue - the previous attribute value before the change event.
-
event.newValue - the new value of the attribute after the change.
-
event.attribute - the name of the attribute on which the event occurred.
-
event.attributeType - the data type of the attribute that causes the event.
-
event.sequenceNumber - a numeric value representing the sequence number of event.
-
event.timeStamp - a time stamp for the event occurrence.
Handling Operation onCall Event
Similar to mbean attributes, JmxBuilder affords developers the ability to listen for operation invocation on an MBean registered in the MBeaServer. JmxBuilder accepts a callback closure that will be executed after the MBean method has invoked.
class EventHandler {
void handleStart(e){
println e
}
}
def handler = new EventHandler()
def beans = jmx.export {
bean(target: new RequestController(), name: "jmx.tutorial:type=Object",
operations: [
"start": [
desc:"Starts request controller",
onCall:handler.&handleStart
]
]
)
}
The snippet above shows how to declare an "onCall" closure to be used as listener when operation "start()" is invoked on the MBean. This sample uses the method pointer syntax to illustrate the versatility of JmxBuilder.
Operation onCall Event Object
When handling the operation onCall event, the callback closure will receive an event object with the following info:
-
event.event - the event type string that was broadcasted.
-
event.source - The object on which the method was invoked.
-
event.data - the data type of the attribute that causes the event.
-
event.sequenceNumber - a numeric value representing the sequence number of event.
-
event.timeStamp - a time stamp for the event occurrence.
Listener MBean
When you export an MBean with the bean() node, you can define events the MBean can listen and react to. The bean() node provides a "listeners:" attribute that lets you define event listeners that your bean can react to.
def beans = jmx.export {
timer(name: "jmx.builder:type=Timer", event: "heartbeat", period: "1s").start()
bean(target: new RequestController(), name: "jmx.tutorial:type=Object",
operations: "*",
listeners: [
heartbeat: [
from: "jmx.builder:type=Timer",
call: { e ->
println e
}
]
]
)
}
In the sample above, we see the syntax for adding listeners to an exported MBean.
-
Fist, a timer is exported and started.
-
Then an MBean is declared that will listen to the timer event and do something meaningful.
-
The "heartbeat:" name is arbitrary and has no correlation to the timer declared above.
-
The source of the event is specified using the "from:" attribute.
You can also specify an event type you are interested in receiving from a broadcaster (since a broadcaster can be emitting multiple events).
Listening to JMX Events
In some cases, you will want to create stand-alone event listeners (not attached to exported MBeans). JmxBuilder provides the Listener() node to let you create JMX listeners that can listen to MBeanServer events. This is useful when creating JMX client applications to monitor/manage JMX agents on remote JMX MBeanServers.
Listener Node Syntax
jmx.listener( event: "...", from: "object name" | ObjectName, call: { event-> } )
Here is the description of the listener() node attributes:
-
event: An optional string that identifies the JMX event type to listen for.
-
from (required): The JMX ObjectName of the component to listen to. This can be specified as a string or an instance of ObjectName
-
call: The closure to execute when the event is captured. This can also be specified as a Groovy method pointer.
Here is an example of JmxBuilder’s listener node:
jmx.timer(name: "jmx.builder:type=Timer", period: "1s").start()
jmx.listener(
from: "jmx.builder:type=Timer",
call: { e ->
println "beep..."
}
)
This example shows how you can use a stand alone listener (outside of an MBean export). Here, we export a timer with a 1 second resolution. Then, we specify a listener to that timer that will print "beep" every second.
Emitting JMX Events
JmxBuilder provides the tools needed to broadcast your own events on the MBeanServer’s event bus. There are no restrictions on the event type you can broadcast. You simply declare your emitter and the event type that you want to send, then broadcast your event at any time. Any registered component in the MBeanServer can register themselves to listen to your events.
Emitter Syntax
jmx.emitter(name:"Object:Name", event:"type")
The attributes for the node Emitter() can be summarized as follows:
-
name: an optional JMX ObjectName used to register your emitter in the MBeanServer. Default is jmx.builder:type=Emitter,name=Emitter@OBJECT_HASH_VALUE
-
event: an option string value that describes the JMX event type. Default is "jmx.builder.event.emitter".
Declare the Emitter
def emitter = jmx.emitter()
The snippet declares the emitter using implicit descriptor syntax. JmxBuilder will do the followings:
-
Create and register an emitter MBean with a default ObjectName.
-
Setup a default event type with value "jmx.builder.event.emitter".
-
Return a GroovyMBean representing the emitter.
As with other nodes in the builder, you can override all keys in the emitter() node. You can specify the ObjectName and the event type.
3.17. Creating Swing UIs
Creating Swing UIs is made easy thanks to the use of SwingBuilder.
3.19. Design patterns in Groovy
Using design patterns with Java is a well-established topic. Design patterns also apply to Groovy:
-
some patterns carry over directly (and can make use of normal Groovy syntax improvements for greater readability)
-
some patterns are no longer required because they are built right into the language or because Groovy supports a better way of achieving the intent of the pattern
-
some patterns that have to be expressed at the design level in other languages can be implemented directly in Groovy (due to the way Groovy can blur the distinction between design and implementation)
3.19.1. Patterns
Abstract Factory Pattern
The Abstract Factory Pattern provides a way to encapsulate a group of individual factories that have a common theme. It embodies the intent of a normal factory, i.e. remove the need for code using an interface to know the concrete implementation behind the interface, but applies to a set of interfaces and selects an entire family of concrete classes which implement those interfaces.
As an example, I might have interfaces Button, TextField and Scrollbar. I might have WindowsButton, MacButton, FlashButton as concrete classes for Button. I might have WindowsScrollBar, MacScrollBar and FlashScrollBar as concrete implementations for ScrollBar. Using the Abstract Factory Pattern should allow me to select which windowing system (i.e. Windows, Mac, Flash) I want to use once and from then on should be able to write code that references the interfaces but is always using the appropriate concrete classes (all from the one windowing system) under the covers.
Example
Suppose we want to write a game system. We might note that many games have very similar features and control.
We decide to try to split the common and game-specific code into separate classes.
First let’s look at the game-specific code for a Two-up game:
class TwoupMessages {
def welcome = 'Welcome to the twoup game, you start with $1000'
def done = 'Sorry, you have no money left, goodbye'
}
class TwoupInputConverter {
def convert(input) { input.toInteger() }
}
class TwoupControl {
private money = 1000
private random = new Random()
private tossWasHead() {
def next = random.nextInt()
return next % 2 == 0
}
def moreTurns() {
if (money > 0) {
println "You have $money, how much would you like to bet?"
return true
}
false
}
def play(amount) {
def coin1 = tossWasHead()
def coin2 = tossWasHead()
if (coin1 && coin2) {
money += amount
println 'You win'
} else if (!coin1 && !coin2) {
money -= amount
println 'You lose'
} else {
println 'Draw'
}
}
}
Now, let’s look at the game-specific code for a number guessing game:
class GuessGameMessages {
def welcome = 'Welcome to the guessing game, my secret number is between 1 and 100'
def done = 'Correct'
}
class GuessGameInputConverter {
def convert(input) { input.toInteger() }
}
class GuessGameControl {
private lower = 1
private upper = 100
private guess = new Random().nextInt(upper - lower) + lower
def moreTurns() {
def done = (lower == guess || upper == guess)
if (!done) {
println "Enter a number between $lower and $upper"
}
!done
}
def play(nextGuess) {
if (nextGuess <= guess) {
lower = [lower, nextGuess].max()
}
if (nextGuess >= guess) {
upper = [upper, nextGuess].min()
}
}
}
Now, let’s write our factory code:
def guessFactory = [messages: GuessGameMessages, control: GuessGameControl, converter: GuessGameInputConverter]
def twoupFactory = [messages: TwoupMessages, control: TwoupControl, converter: TwoupInputConverter]
class GameFactory {
def static factory
def static getMessages() { return factory.messages.newInstance() }
def static getControl() { return factory.control.newInstance() }
def static getConverter() { return factory.converter.newInstance() }
}
The important aspect of this factory is that it allows selection of an entire family of concrete classes.
Here is how we would use the factory:
GameFactory.factory = twoupFactory
def messages = GameFactory.messages
def control = GameFactory.control
def converter = GameFactory.converter
println messages.welcome
def reader = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(System.in))
while (control.moreTurns()) {
def input = reader.readLine().trim()
control.play(converter.convert(input))
}
println messages.done
Note that the first line configures which family of concrete game classes we will use. It’s not important that we selected which family to use by using the factory property as shown in the first line. Other ways would be equally valid examples of this pattern. For example, we may have asked the user which game they wanted to play or determined which game from an environment setting.
With the code as shown, the game might look like this when run:
Welcome to the twoup game, you start with $1000 You have 1000, how much would you like to bet? 300 Draw You have 1000, how much would you like to bet? 700 You win You have 1700, how much would you like to bet? 1700 You lose Sorry, you have no money left, goodbye
If we change the first line of the script to GameFactory.factory = guessFactory, then the sample run might look like this:
Welcome to the guessing game, my secret number is between 1 and 100 Enter a number between 1 and 100 75 Enter a number between 1 and 75 35 Enter a number between 1 and 35 15 Enter a number between 1 and 15 5 Enter a number between 5 and 15 10 Correct
Adapter Pattern
The Adapter Pattern (sometimes called the wrapper pattern) allows objects satisfying one interface to be used where another type of interface is expected. There are two typical flavours of the pattern: the delegation flavour and the inheritance flavour.
Delegation Example
Suppose we have the following classes:
class SquarePeg {
def width
}
class RoundPeg {
def radius
}
class RoundHole {
def radius
def pegFits(peg) {
peg.radius <= radius
}
String toString() { "RoundHole with radius $radius" }
}
We can ask the RoundHole
class if a RoundPeg
fits in it, but if we ask the same question for a SquarePeg
, then it will fail because the SquarePeg
class doesn’t have a radius
property (i.e. doesn’t satisfy the required interface).
To get around this problem, we can create an adapter to make it appear to have the correct interface. It would look like this:
class SquarePegAdapter {
def peg
def getRadius() {
Math.sqrt(((peg.width / 2) ** 2) * 2)
}
String toString() {
"SquarePegAdapter with peg width $peg.width (and notional radius $radius)"
}
}
We can use the adapter like this:
def hole = new RoundHole(radius: 4.0)
(4..7).each { w ->
def peg = new SquarePegAdapter(peg: new SquarePeg(width: w))
if (hole.pegFits(peg)) {
println "peg $peg fits in hole $hole"
} else {
println "peg $peg does not fit in hole $hole"
}
}
Which results in the following output:
peg SquarePegAdapter with peg width 4 (and notional radius 2.8284271247461903) fits in hole RoundHole with radius 4.0 peg SquarePegAdapter with peg width 5 (and notional radius 3.5355339059327378) fits in hole RoundHole with radius 4.0 peg SquarePegAdapter with peg width 6 (and notional radius 4.242640687119285) does not fit in hole RoundHole with radius 4.0 peg SquarePegAdapter with peg width 7 (and notional radius 4.949747468305833) does not fit in hole RoundHole with radius 4.0
Inheritance Example
Let’s consider the same example again using inheritance. First, here are the original classes (unchanged):
class SquarePeg {
def width
}
class RoundPeg {
def radius
}
class RoundHole {
def radius
def pegFits(peg) {
peg.radius <= radius
}
String toString() { "RoundHole with radius $radius" }
}
An adapter using inheritance:
class SquarePegAdapter extends SquarePeg {
def getRadius() {
Math.sqrt(((width / 2) ** 2) * 2)
}
String toString() {
"SquarePegAdapter with width $width (and notional radius $radius)"
}
}
Using the adapter:
def hole = new RoundHole(radius: 4.0)
(4..7).each { w ->
def peg = new SquarePegAdapter(width: w)
if (hole.pegFits(peg)) {
println "peg $peg fits in hole $hole"
} else {
println "peg $peg does not fit in hole $hole"
}
}
The output:
peg SquarePegAdapter with width 4 (and notional radius 2.8284271247461903) fits in hole RoundHole with radius 4.0 peg SquarePegAdapter with width 5 (and notional radius 3.5355339059327378) fits in hole RoundHole with radius 4.0 peg SquarePegAdapter with width 6 (and notional radius 4.242640687119285) does not fit in hole RoundHole with radius 4.0 peg SquarePegAdapter with width 7 (and notional radius 4.949747468305833) does not fit in hole RoundHole with radius 4.0
Adapting using Closures
As a variation of the previous examples, we could instead define the following interface:
interface RoundThing {
def getRadius()
}
We can then define an adapter as a closure as follows:
def adapter = {
p -> [getRadius: { Math.sqrt(((p.width / 2) ** 2) * 2) }] as RoundThing
}
And use it like this:
def peg = new SquarePeg(width: 4)
if (hole.pegFits(adapter(peg))) {
// ... as before
}
Adapting using the ExpandoMetaClass
As of Groovy 1.1, there is a built-in MetaClass which can automatically add properties and methods dynamically.
Here is how the example would work using that feature:
def peg = new SquarePeg(width: 4)
peg.metaClass.radius = Math.sqrt(((peg.width / 2) ** 2) * 2)
After you create a peg object, you can simply add a property to it on the fly. No need to change the original class and no need for an adapter class.
Bouncer Pattern
The Bouncer Pattern describes usage of a method whose sole purpose is to either throw an exception (when particular conditions hold) or do nothing. Such methods are often used to defensively guard pre-conditions of a method.
When writing utility methods, you should always guard against faulty input arguments. When writing internal methods, you may be able to ensure that certain pre-conditions always hold by having sufficient unit tests in place. Under such circumstances, you may reduce the desirability to have guards on your methods.
Groovy differs from other languages in that you frequently use the assert
method within your methods rather than having a large number of utility checker methods or classes.
Null Checking Example
We might have a utility method such as:
class NullChecker {
static check(name, arg) {
if (arg == null) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException(name + ' is null')
}
}
}
And we would use it like this:
void doStuff(String name, Object value) {
NullChecker.check('name', name)
NullChecker.check('value', value)
// do stuff
}
But a more Groovy way to do this would simply be like this:
void doStuff(String name, Object value) {
assert name != null, 'name should not be null'
assert value != null, 'value should not be null'
// do stuff
}
Validation Example
As an alternative example, we might have this utility method:
class NumberChecker {
static final String NUMBER_PATTERN = "\\\\d+(\\\\.\\\\d+(E-?\\\\d+)?)?"
static isNumber(str) {
if (!str ==~ NUMBER_PATTERN) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Argument '$str' must be a number")
}
}
static isNotZero(number) {
if (number == 0) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException('Argument must not be 0')
}
}
}
And we would use it like this:
def stringDivide(String dividendStr, String divisorStr) {
NumberChecker.isNumber(dividendStr)
NumberChecker.isNumber(divisorStr)
def dividend = dividendStr.toDouble()
def divisor = divisorStr.toDouble()
NumberChecker.isNotZero(divisor)
dividend / divisor
}
println stringDivide('1.2E2', '3.0')
// => 40.0
But with Groovy we could just as easily use:
def stringDivide(String dividendStr, String divisorStr) {
assert dividendStr =~ NumberChecker.NUMBER_PATTERN
assert divisorStr =~ NumberChecker.NUMBER_PATTERN
def dividend = dividendStr.toDouble()
def divisor = divisorStr.toDouble()
assert divisor != 0, 'Divisor must not be 0'
dividend / divisor
}
Chain of Responsibility Pattern
In the Chain of Responsibility Pattern, objects using and implementing an interface (one or more methods) are intentionally loosely coupled. A set of objects that implement the interface are organised in a list (or in rare cases a tree). Objects using the interface make requests from the first implementor object. It will decide whether to perform any action itself and whether to pass the request further down the line in the list (or tree). Sometimes a default implementation for some request is also coded into the pattern if none of the implementors respond to the request.
Example
In this example, the script sends requests to the lister
object. The lister
points to a UnixLister
object. If it can’t handle the request, it sends the request to the WindowsLister
. If it can’t handle the request, it sends the request to the DefaultLister
.
class UnixLister {
private nextInLine
UnixLister(next) { nextInLine = next }
def listFiles(dir) {
if (System.getProperty('os.name') == 'Linux') {
println "ls $dir".execute().text
} else {
nextInLine.listFiles(dir)
}
}
}
class WindowsLister {
private nextInLine
WindowsLister(next) { nextInLine = next }
def listFiles(dir) {
if (System.getProperty('os.name') == 'Windows XP') {
println "cmd.exe /c dir $dir".execute().text
} else {
nextInLine.listFiles(dir)
}
}
}
class DefaultLister {
def listFiles(dir) {
new File(dir).eachFile { f -> println f }
}
}
def lister = new UnixLister(new WindowsLister(new DefaultLister()))
lister.listFiles('Downloads')
The output will be a list of files (with slightly different format depending on the operating system).
Here is a UML representation:
Variations to this pattern:
-
we could have an explicit interface, e.g.
Lister
, to statically type the implementations but because of duck-typing this is optional -
we could use a chain tree instead of a list, e.g.
if (animal.hasBackbone())
delegate toVertebrateHandler
else delegate toInvertebrateHandler
-
we could always pass down the chain even if we processed a request
-
we could decide at some point to not respond and not pass down the chain
-
we could use Groovy’s meta-programming capabilities to pass unknown methods down the chain
Composite Pattern
The Composite Pattern allows you to treat single instances of an object the same way as a group of objects. The pattern is often used with hierarchies of objects. Typically, one or more methods should be callable in the same way for either leaf or composite nodes within the hierarchy. In such a case, composite nodes typically invoke the same named method for each of their children nodes.
Example
Consider this usage of the composite pattern where we want to call toString()
on either Leaf
or Composite
objects.
In Java, the Component
class is essential as it provides the type used for both leaf and composite nodes. In Groovy, because of duck-typing, we don’t need it for that purpose, however, it can still serve as a useful place to place common behaviour between the leaf and composite nodes.
For our purposes, we will assemble the following hierarchy of components.
Here is the code:
abstract class Component {
def name
def toString(indent) {
("-" * indent) + name
}
}
class Composite extends Component {
private children = []
def toString(indent) {
def s = super.toString(indent)
children.each { child ->
s += "\\n" + child.toString(indent + 1)
}
s
}
def leftShift(component) {
children << component
}
}
class Leaf extends Component { }
def root = new Composite(name: "root")
root << new Leaf(name: "leaf A")
def comp = new Composite(name: "comp B")
root << comp
root << new Leaf(name: "leaf C")
comp << new Leaf(name: "leaf B1")
comp << new Leaf(name: "leaf B2")
println root.toString(0)
Here is the resulting output:
root -leaf A -comp B --leaf B1 --leaf B2 -leaf C
Decorator Pattern
The Decorator Pattern provides a mechanism to embellish the behaviour of an object without changing its essential interface. A decorated object should be able to be substituted wherever the original (non-decorated) object was expected. Decoration typically does not involve modifying the source code of the original object and decorators should be able to be combined in flexible ways to produce objects with several embellishments.
Traditional Example
Suppose we have the following Logger
class.
class Logger {
def log(String message) {
println message
}
}
There might be times when it is useful to timestamp a log message, or times when we might want to change the case of the message. We could try to build all of this functionality into our Logger
class. If we did that, the Logger
class would start to be very complex. Also, everyone would obtain all of features even when they might not want a small subset of the features. Finally, feature interaction would become quite difficult to control.
To overcome these drawbacks, we instead define two decorator classes. Uses of the Logger
class are free to embellish their base logger with zero or more decorator classes in whatever order they desire. The classes look like this:
class TimeStampingLogger extends Logger {
private Logger logger
TimeStampingLogger(logger) {
this.logger = logger
}
def log(String message) {
def now = Calendar.instance
logger.log("$now.time: $message")
}
}
class UpperLogger extends Logger {
private Logger logger
UpperLogger(logger) {
this.logger = logger
}
def log(String message) {
logger.log(message.toUpperCase())
}
}
We can use the decorators like so:
def logger = new UpperLogger(new TimeStampingLogger(new Logger()))
logger.log("G'day Mate")
// => Tue May 22 07:13:50 EST 2007: G'DAY MATE
You can see that we embellish the logger behaviour with both decorators. Because of the order we chose to apply the decorators, our log message comes out capitalised and the timestamp is in normal case. If we swap the order around, let’s see what happens:
logger = new TimeStampingLogger(new UpperLogger(new Logger()))
logger.log('Hi There')
// => TUE MAY 22 07:13:50 EST 2007: HI THERE
Now the timestamp itself has also been changed to be uppercase.
A touch of dynamic behaviour
Our previous decorators were specific to Logger
objects. We can use Groovy’s Meta-Object Programming capabilities to create a decorator which is far more general purpose in nature. Consider this class:
class GenericLowerDecorator {
private delegate
GenericLowerDecorator(delegate) {
this.delegate = delegate
}
def invokeMethod(String name, args) {
def newargs = args.collect { arg ->
if (arg instanceof String) {
return arg.toLowerCase()
} else {
return arg
}
}
delegate.invokeMethod(name, newargs)
}
}
It takes any class and decorates it so that any String
method parameter will automatically be changed to lower case.
logger = new GenericLowerDecorator(new TimeStampingLogger(new Logger()))
logger.log('IMPORTANT Message')
// => Tue May 22 07:27:18 EST 2007: important message
Just be careful with ordering here. The original decorators were restricted to decorating Logger
objects. This decorator works with any object type, so we can’t swap the ordering around, i.e. this won’t work:
// Can't mix and match Interface-Oriented and Generic decorators // logger = new TimeStampingLogger(new GenericLowerDecorator(new Logger()))
We could overcome this limitation be generating an appropriate Proxy type at runtime but we won’t complicate the example here.
Runtime behaviour embellishment
You can also consider using the ExpandoMetaClass
from Groovy 1.1 to dynamically embellish a class with behaviour. This isn’t the normal style of usage of the decorator pattern (it certainly isn’t nearly as flexible) but may help you to achieve similar results in some cases without creating a new class.
Here’s what the code looks like:
// current mechanism to enable ExpandoMetaClass
GroovySystem.metaClassRegistry.metaClassCreationHandle = new ExpandoMetaClassCreationHandle()
def logger = new Logger()
logger.metaClass.log = { String m -> println 'message: ' + m.toUpperCase() }
logger.log('x')
// => message: X
This achieves a similar result to applying a single decorator but we have no way to easily apply and remove embellishments on the fly.
More dynamic decorating
Suppose we have a calculator class (Actually any class would do).
class Calc {
def add(a, b) { a + b }
}
We might be interested in observing usage of the class over time. If it is buried deep within our codebase, it might be hard to determine when it is being called and with what parameters. Also, it might be hard to know if it is performing well. We can easily make a generic tracing decorator that prints out tracing information whenever any method on the Calc
class is called and also provide timing information about how long it took to execute. Here is the code for the tracing decorator:
class TracingDecorator {
private delegate
TracingDecorator(delegate) {
this.delegate = delegate
}
def invokeMethod(String name, args) {
println "Calling $name$args"
def before = System.currentTimeMillis()
def result = delegate.invokeMethod(name, args)
println "Got $result in ${System.currentTimeMillis()-before} ms"
result
}
}
Here is how to use the class in a script:
def tracedCalc = new TracingDecorator(new Calc())
assert 15 == tracedCalc.add(3, 12)
And here is what you would see after running this script:
Calling add{3, 12} Got 15 in 31 ms
Decorating with an Interceptor
The above timing example hooks into the lifecycle of Groovy objects (via invokeMethod
). This is such an important style performing meta-programming that Groovy has special support for this style of decorating using interceptors.
Groovy even comes with a built-in TracingInterceptor
. We can extend the built-in class like this:
class TimingInterceptor extends TracingInterceptor {
private beforeTime
def beforeInvoke(object, String methodName, Object[] arguments) {
super.beforeInvoke(object, methodName, arguments)
beforeTime = System.currentTimeMillis()
}
Object afterInvoke(Object object, String methodName, Object[] arguments, Object result) {
super.afterInvoke(object, methodName, arguments, result)
def duration = System.currentTimeMillis() - beforeTime
writer.write("Duration: $duration ms\\n")
writer.flush()
result
}
}
Here is an example of using this new class:
def proxy = ProxyMetaClass.getInstance(Calc)
proxy.interceptor = new TimingInterceptor()
proxy.use {
assert 7 == new Calc().add(1, 6)
}
And here is the output:
before Calc.ctor() after Calc.ctor() Duration: 0 ms before Calc.add(java.lang.Integer, java.lang.Integer) after Calc.add(java.lang.Integer, java.lang.Integer) Duration: 2 ms
Decorating with java.lang.reflect.Proxy
If you are trying to decorate an object (i.e. just a particular instance of the class, not the class generally), then you can use Java’s java.lang.reflect.Proxy
. Groovy makes working with this easier than just Java. Below is a code sample taken out of a grails project that wraps a java.sql.Connection
so that it’s close method is a no-op:
protected Sql getGroovySql() {
final Connection con = session.connection()
def invoker = { object, method, args ->
if (method.name == "close") {
log.debug("ignoring call to Connection.close() for use by groovy.sql.Sql")
} else {
log.trace("delegating $method")
return con.invokeMethod(method.name, args)
}
} as InvocationHandler;
def proxy = Proxy.newProxyInstance( getClass().getClassLoader(), [Connection] as Class[], invoker )
return new Sql(proxy)
}
If there were many methods to intercept, then this approach could be modified to look up closure in a map by method name and invoke it.
Decorating with Spring
The Spring Framework allows decorators to be applied with interceptors (you may have heard the terms advice or aspect). You can leverage this mechanism from Groovy as well.
First define a class that you want to decorate (we’ll also use an interface as is normal Spring practice):
Here’s the interface:
interface Calc {
def add(a, b)
}
Here’s the class:
class CalcImpl implements Calc {
def add(a, b) { a + b }
}
Now, we define our wiring in a file called beans.xml
as follows:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xmlns:lang="http://www.springframework.org/schema/lang"
xsi:schemaLocation="
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans.xsd
http://www.springframework.org/schema/lang http://www.springframework.org/schema/lang/spring-lang.xsd">
<bean id="performanceInterceptor" autowire="no"
class="org.springframework.aop.interceptor.PerformanceMonitorInterceptor">
<property name="loggerName" value="performance"/>
</bean>
<bean id="calc" class="util.CalcImpl"/>
<bean class="org.springframework.aop.framework.autoproxy.BeanNameAutoProxyCreator">
<property name="beanNames" value="calc"/>
<property name="interceptorNames" value="performanceInterceptor"/>
</bean>
</beans>
Now, our script looks like this:
@Grab('org.springframework:spring-context:3.2.2.RELEASE')
import org.springframework.context.support.ClassPathXmlApplicationContext
def ctx = new ClassPathXmlApplicationContext('beans.xml')
def calc = ctx.getBean('calc')
println calc.add(3, 25)
And when we run it, we see the results:
21/05/2007 23:02:35 org.springframework.aop.interceptor.PerformanceMonitorInterceptor invokeUnderTrace FINEST: StopWatch 'util.Calc.add': running time (millis) = 16
You may have to adjust your logging.properties
file for messages at log level FINEST
to be displayed.
Asynchronous Decorators using GPars
The following example is inspired by some of the early example code for the Panini programming language. These days, you’ll see this style used with async functions in JavaScript.
@Grab('org.codehaus.gpars:gpars:0.10')
import static groovyx.gpars.GParsPool.withPool
interface Document {
void print()
String getText()
}
class DocumentImpl implements Document {
def document
void print() { println document }
String getText() { document }
}
def words(String text) {
text.replaceAll('[^a-zA-Z]', ' ').trim().split("\\\\s+")*.toLowerCase()
}
def avgWordLength = {
def words = words(it.text)
sprintf "Avg Word Length: %4.2f", words*.size().sum() / words.size()
}
def modeWord = {
def wordGroups = words(it.text).groupBy {it}.collectEntries { k, v -> [k, v.size()] }
def maxSize = wordGroups*.value.max()
def maxWords = wordGroups.findAll { it.value == maxSize }
"Mode Word(s): ${maxWords*.key.join(', ')} ($maxSize occurrences)"
}
def wordCount = { d -> "Word Count: " + words(d.text).size() }
def asyncDecorator(Document d, Closure c) {
ProxyGenerator.INSTANCE.instantiateDelegate([print: {
withPool {
def result = c.callAsync(d)
d.print()
println result.get()
}
}], [Document], d)
}
Document d = asyncDecorator(asyncDecorator(asyncDecorator(
new DocumentImpl(document:"This is the file with the words in it\\n\\t\\nDo you see the words?\\n"),
// new DocumentImpl(document: new File('AsyncDecorator.groovy').text),
wordCount), modeWord), avgWordLength)
d.print()
Delegation Pattern
The Delegation Pattern is a technique where an object’s behavior (public methods) is implemented by delegating responsibility to one or more associated objects.
Groovy allows the traditional style of applying the delegation pattern, e.g. see Replace Inheritance with Delegation.
Implement Delegation Pattern using ExpandoMetaClass
The groovy.lang.ExpandoMetaClass allows usage of this pattern to be encapsulated in a library. This allows Groovy to emulate similar libraries available for the Ruby language.
Consider the following library class:
class Delegator {
private targetClass
private delegate
Delegator(targetClass, delegate) {
this.targetClass = targetClass
this.delegate = delegate
}
def delegate(String methodName) {
delegate(methodName, methodName)
}
def delegate(String methodName, String asMethodName) {
targetClass.metaClass."$asMethodName" = delegate.&"$methodName"
}
def delegateAll(String[] names) {
names.each { delegate(it) }
}
def delegateAll(Map names) {
names.each { k, v -> delegate(k, v) }
}
def delegateAll() {
delegate.class.methods*.name.each { delegate(it) }
}
}
With this in your classpath, you can now apply the delegation pattern dynamically as shown in the following examples. First, consider we have the following classes:
class Person {
String name
}
class MortgageLender {
def borrowAmount(amount) {
"borrow \\$$amount"
}
def borrowFor(thing) {
"buy \\$thing"
}
}
def lender = new MortgageLender()
def delegator = new Delegator(Person, lender)
We can now use the delegator to automatically borrow methods from the lender object to extend the Person class. We can borrow the methods as is or with a rename:
delegator.delegate 'borrowFor'
delegator.delegate 'borrowAmount', 'getMoney'
def p = new Person()
println p.borrowFor('present') // => buy present
println p.getMoney(50)
The first line above, adds the borrowFor method to the Person class by delegating to the lender object. The second line adds a getMoney method to the Person class by delegating to the lender object’s borrowAmount method.
Alternatively, we could borrow multiple methods like this:
delegator.delegateAll 'borrowFor', 'borrowAmount'
Which adds these two methods to the Person class.
Or if we want all the methods, like this:
delegator.delegateAll()
Which will make all the methods in the delegate object available in the Person class.
Alternatively, we can use a map notation to rename multiple methods:
delegator.delegateAll borrowAmount:'getMoney', borrowFor:'getThing'
Implement Delegation Pattern using @Delegate annotation
Since version 1.6 you can use the built-in delegation mechanism which is based on AST transformation.
This make delegation even easier:
class Person {
def name
@Delegate MortgageLender mortgageLender = new MortgageLender()
}
class MortgageLender {
def borrowAmount(amount) {
"borrow \\$$amount"
}
def borrowFor(thing) {
"buy $thing"
}
}
def p = new Person()
assert "buy present" == p.borrowFor('present')
assert "borrow \\$50" == p.borrowAmount(50)
Flyweight Pattern
The Flyweight Pattern is a pattern for greatly reducing memory requirements by not requiring that heavy-weight objects be created in large numbers when dealing with systems that contain many things that are mostly the same. If for instance, a document was modelled using a complex character class that knew about unicode, fonts, positioning, etc., then the memory requirements could be quite large for large documents if each physical character in the document required its own character class instance. Instead, characters themselves might be kept within Strings and we might have one character class (or a small number such as one character class for each font type) that knew the specifics of how to deal with characters.
In such circumstances, we call the state that is shared with many other things (e.g. the character type) instrinsic state. It is captured within the heavy-weight class. The state which distinguishes the physical character (maybe just its ASCII code or Unicode) is called its extrinsic state.
Example
First we are going to model some complex aircraft (the first being a hoax competitor of the second - not that is relevant to the example).
class Boeing797 {
def wingspan = '80.8 m'
def capacity = 1000
def speed = '1046 km/h'
def range = '14400 km'
// ...
}
class Airbus380 {
def wingspan = '79.8 m'
def capacity = 555
def speed = '912 km/h'
def range = '10370 km'
// ...
}
If we want to model our fleet, our first attempt might involve using many instances of these heavy-weight objects. It turns out though that only a few small pieces of state (our extrinsic state) change for each aircraft, so we will have singletons for the heavy-weight objects and capture the extrinsic state (bought date and asset number in the code below) separately.
class FlyweightFactory {
static instances = [797: new Boeing797(), 380: new Airbus380()]
}
class Aircraft {
private type // instrinsic state
private assetNumber // extrinsic state
private bought // extrinsic state
Aircraft(typeCode, assetNumber, bought) {
type = FlyweightFactory.instances[typeCode]
this.assetNumber = assetNumber
this.bought = bought
}
def describe() {
println """
Asset Number: $assetNumber
Capacity: $type.capacity people
Speed: $type.speed
Range: $type.range
Bought: $bought
"""
}
}
def fleet = [
new Aircraft(380, 1001, '10-May-2007'),
new Aircraft(380, 1002, '10-Nov-2007'),
new Aircraft(797, 1003, '10-May-2008'),
new Aircraft(797, 1004, '10-Nov-2008')
]
fleet.each { p -> p.describe() }
So here, even if our fleet contained hundreds of planes, we would only have one heavy-weight object for each type of aircraft.
As a further efficiency measure, we might use lazy creation of the flyweight objects rather than create the initial map up front as in the above example.
Running this script results in:
Asset Number: 1001 Capacity: 555 people Speed: 912 km/h Range: 10370 km Bought: 10-May-2007 Asset Number: 1002 Capacity: 555 people Speed: 912 km/h Range: 10370 km Bought: 10-Nov-2007 Asset Number: 1003 Capacity: 1000 people Speed: 1046 km/h Range: 14400 km Bought: 10-May-2008 Asset Number: 1004 Capacity: 1000 people Speed: 1046 km/h Range: 14400 km Bought: 10-Nov-2008
Iterator Pattern
The Iterator Pattern allows sequential access to the elements of an aggregate object without exposing its underlying representation.
Groovy has the iterator pattern built right in to many of its closure operators, e.g. each
and eachWithIndex
as well as the for .. in
loop.
For example:
def printAll(container) {
for (item in container) { println item }
}
def numbers = [ 1,2,3,4 ]
def months = [ Mar:31, Apr:30, May:31 ]
def colors = [ java.awt.Color.BLACK, java.awt.Color.WHITE ]
printAll numbers
printAll months
printAll colors
Results in the output:
1 2 3 4 May=31 Mar=31 Apr=30 java.awt.Color[r=0,g=0,b=0] java.awt.Color[r=255,g=255,b=255]
Another example:
colors.eachWithIndex { item, pos ->
println "Position $pos contains '$item'"
}
Results in:
Position 0 contains 'java.awt.Color[r=0,g=0,b=0]' Position 1 contains 'java.awt.Color[r=255,g=255,b=255]'
The iterator pattern is also built in to other special operators such as the eachByte
, eachFile
, eachDir
, eachLine
, eachObject
, eachMatch
operators for working with streams, URLs, files, directories and regular expressions matches.
Loan my Resource Pattern
The Loan my Resource pattern ensures that a resource is deterministically disposed of once it goes out of scope.
This pattern is built in to many Groovy helper methods. You should consider using it yourself if you need to work with resources in ways beyond what Groovy supports.
Example
Consider the following code which works with a file. First we might write some line to the file and then print its size:
def f = new File('junk.txt')
f.withPrintWriter { pw ->
pw.println(new Date())
pw.println(this.class.name)
}
println f.size()
// => 42
We could also read back the contents of the file a line at a time and print each line out:
f.eachLine { line ->
println line
}
// =>
// Mon Jun 18 22:38:17 EST 2007
// RunPattern
Note that normal Java Reader
and PrintWriter
objects were used under the covers by Groovy but the code writer did not have to worry about explicitly creating or closing those resources. The built-in Groovy methods loan the respective reader or writer to the closure code and then tidy up after themselves. So, you are using this pattern without having to do any work.
Sometimes however, you wish to do things slightly differently to what you can get for free using Groovy’s built-in mechanisms. You should consider utilising this pattern within your own resource-handling operations.
Consider how you might process the list of words on each line within the file. We could actually do this one too using Groovy’s built-in functions, but bear with us and assume we have to do some resource handling ourselves. Here is how we might write the code without using this pattern:
def reader = f.newReader()
reader.splitEachLine(' ') { wordList ->
println wordList
}
reader.close()
// =>
// [ "Mon", "Jun", "18", "22:38:17", "EST", "2007" ]
// [ "RunPattern" ]
Notice that we now have an explicit call to close()
in our code. If we didn’t code it just right (here we didn’t surround the code in a try … finally
block, we run the risk of leaving the file handle open.
Let’s now apply the loan pattern. First, we’ll write a helper method:
def withListOfWordsForEachLine(File f, Closure c) {
def r = f.newReader()
try {
r.splitEachLine(' ', c)
} finally {
r?.close()
}
}
Now, we can re-write our code as follows:
withListOfWordsForEachLine(f) { wordList ->
println wordList
}
// =>
// [ "Mon", "Jun", "18", "22:38:17", "EST", "2007" ]
// [ "RunPattern" ]
This is much simpler and has removed the explicit close()
. This is now catered for in one spot so we can apply the appropriate level of testing or reviewing in just one spot to be sure we have no problems.
Null Object Pattern
The Null Object Pattern involves using a special object place-marker object representing null. Typically, if you have a reference to null, you can’t invoke reference.field
or reference.method()
You receive the dreaded NullPointerException
. The null object pattern uses a special object representing null, instead of using an actual null
. This allows you to invoke field and method references on the null object. The result of using the null object should semantically be equivalent to doing nothing.
Simple Example
Suppose we have the following system:
class Job {
def salary
}
class Person {
def name
def Job job
}
def people = [
new Person(name: 'Tom', job: new Job(salary: 1000)),
new Person(name: 'Dick', job: new Job(salary: 1200)),
]
def biggestSalary = people.collect { p -> p.job.salary }.max()
println biggestSalary
When run, this prints out 1200
. Suppose now that we now invoke:
people << new Person(name: 'Harry')
If we now try to calculate biggestSalary
again, we receive a null pointer exception.
To overcome this problem, we can introduce a NullJob
class and change the above statement to become:
class NullJob extends Job { def salary = 0 }
people << new Person(name: 'Harry', job: new NullJob())
biggestSalary = people.collect { p -> p.job.salary }.max()
println biggestSalary
This works as we require but it’s not always the best way to do this with Groovy. Groovy’s safe-dereference operator (?.
) operator and null aware closures often allow Groovy to avoid the need to create a special null object or null class. This is illustrated by examining a groovier way to write the above example:
people << new Person(name:'Harry')
biggestSalary = people.collect { p -> p.job?.salary }.max()
println biggestSalary
Two things are going on here to allow this to work. First of all, max()
is 'null aware' so that [300, null, 400].max() == 400. Secondly, with the ?.
operator, an expression like p?.job?.salary
will be equal to null if salary
is equal to null, or if job
is equal ` null or if p
is equal to null. You don’t need to code a complex nested if ... then ... else to avoid a NullPointerException
.
Tree Example
Consider the following example where we want to calculate size, cumulative sum and cumulative product of all the values in a tree structure.
Our first attempt has special logic within the calculation methods to handle null values.
class NullHandlingTree {
def left, right, value
def size() {
1 + (left ? left.size() : 0) + (right ? right.size() : 0)
}
def sum() {
value + (left ? left.sum() : 0) + (right ? right.sum() : 0)
}
def product() {
value * (left ? left.product() : 1) * (right ? right.product() : 1)
}
}
def root = new NullHandlingTree(
value: 2,
left: new NullHandlingTree(
value: 3,
right: new NullHandlingTree(value: 4),
left: new NullHandlingTree(value: 5)
)
)
println root.size()
println root.sum()
println root.product()
If we introduce the null object pattern (here by defining the NullTree
class), we can now simplify the logic in the size()
, sum()
and`product()` methods. These methods now much more clearly represent the logic for the normal (and now universal) case. Each of the methods within NullTree
returns a value which represents doing nothing.
class Tree {
def left = new NullTree(), right = new NullTree(), value
def size() {
1 + left.size() + right.size()
}
def sum() {
value + left.sum() + right.sum()
}
def product() {
value * left.product() * right.product()
}
}
class NullTree {
def size() { 0 }
def sum() { 0 }
def product() { 1 }
}
def root = new Tree(
value: 2,
left: new Tree(
value: 3,
right: new Tree(value: 4),
left: new Tree(value: 5)
)
)
println root.size()
println root.sum()
println root.product()
The result of running either of these examples is:
4 14 120
Note: a slight variation with the null object pattern is to combine it with the singleton pattern. So, we wouldn’t write new NullTree() wherever we needed a null object as shown above. Instead we would have a single null object instance which we would place within our data structures as needed.
Pimp my Library Pattern
The Pimp my Library Pattern suggests an approach for extending a library that nearly does everything that you need but just needs a little more. It assumes that you do not have source code for the library of interest.
Example
Suppose we want to make use of the built-in Integer facilities in Groovy (which build upon the features already in Java). Those libraries have nearly all of the features we want but not quite everything. We may not have all of the source code to the Groovy and Java libraries so we can’t just change the library. Instead we augment the library. Groovy has a number of ways to do this. One way is to use a Category.
First, we’ll define a suitable category.
class EnhancedInteger {
static boolean greaterThanAll(Integer self, Object[] others) {
greaterThanAll(self, others)
}
static boolean greaterThanAll(Integer self, others) {
others.every { self > it }
}
}
We have added two methods which augment the Integer methods by providing the greaterThanAll
method. Categories follow conventions where they are defined as static methods with a special first parameter representing the class we wish to extend. The greaterThanAll(Integer self, others) static method becomes the greaterThanAll(other)
instance method.
We defined two versions of greaterThanAll
. One which works for collections, ranges etc. The other which works with a variable number of Integer
arguments.
Here is how you would use the category.
use(EnhancedInteger) {
assert 4.greaterThanAll(1, 2, 3)
assert !5.greaterThanAll(2, 4, 6)
assert 5.greaterThanAll(-4..4)
assert 5.greaterThanAll([])
assert !5.greaterThanAll([4, 5])
}
As you can see, using this technique you can effectively enrich an original class without having access to its source code. Moreover, you can apply different enrichments in different parts of the system as well as work with un-enriched objects if we need to.
Proxy Pattern
The Proxy Pattern allows one object to act as a pretend replacement for some other object. In general, whoever is using the proxy, doesn’t realise that they are not using the real thing. The pattern is useful when the real object is hard to create or use: it may exist over a network connection, or be a large object in memory, or be a file, database or some other resource that is expensive or impossible to duplicate.
Example
One common use of the proxy pattern is when talking to remote objects in a different JVM. Here is the client code for creating a proxy that talks via sockets to a server object as well as an example usage:
class AccumulatorProxy {
def accumulate(args) {
def result
def s = new Socket("localhost", 54321)
s.withObjectStreams { ois, oos ->
oos << args
result = ois.readObject()
}
s.close()
return result
}
}
println new AccumulatorProxy().accumulate([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10])
// => 55
Here is what your server code might look like (start this first):
class Accumulator {
def accumulate(args) {
args.inject(0) { total, arg -> total += arg }
}
}
def port = 54321
def accumulator = new Accumulator()
def server = new ServerSocket(port)
println "Starting server on port $port"
while(true) {
server.accept() { socket ->
socket.withObjectStreams { ois, oos ->
def args = ois.readObject()
oos << accumulator.accumulate(args)
}
}
}
Singleton Pattern
The Singleton Pattern is used to make sure only one object of a particular class is ever created. This can be useful when when exactly one object is needed to coordinate actions across a system; perhaps for efficiency where creating lots of identical objects would be wasteful, perhaps because a particular algorithm needing a single point of control is required or perhaps when an object is used to interact with a non-shareable resource.
Weaknesses of the Singleton pattern include:
-
It can reduce reuse. For instance, there are issues if you want to use inheritance with Singletons. If
SingletonB
extendsSingletonA
, should there be exactly (at most) one instance of each or should the creation of an object from one of the classes prohibit creation from the other. Also, if you decide both classes can have an instance, how do you override thegetInstance()
method which is static? -
It is also hard to test singletons in general because of the static methods but Groovy can support that if required.
Example: The Classic Java Singleton
Suppose we wish to create a class for collecting votes. Because getting the right number of votes may be very important, we decide to use the singleton pattern. There will only ever be one VoteCollector
object, so it makes it easier for us to reason about that objects creation and use.
class VoteCollector {
def votes = 0
private static final INSTANCE = new VoteCollector()
static getInstance() { return INSTANCE }
private VoteCollector() { }
def display() { println "Collector:${hashCode()}, Votes:$votes" }
}
Some points of interest about this code:
-
it has a private constructor, so no
VoteCollector
objects can be created in our system (except for theINSTANCE
we create) -
the
INSTANCE
is also private, so it can’t be changed once set -
we haven’t made the updating of votes thread-safe at this point (it doesn’t add to this example)
-
the vote collector instance is not lazily created (if we never reference the class, the instance won’t be created; however, as soon as we reference the class, the instance will be created even if not needed initially)
We can use this singleton class in some script code as follows:
def collector = VoteCollector.instance
collector.display()
collector.votes++
collector = null
Thread.start{
def collector2 = VoteCollector.instance
collector2.display()
collector2.votes++
collector2 = null
}.join()
def collector3 = VoteCollector.instance
collector3.display()
Here we used the instance 3 times. The second usage was even in a different thread (but don’t try this in a scenario with a new class loader).
Running this script yields (your hashcode value will vary):
Collector:15959960, Votes:0 Collector:15959960, Votes:1 Collector:15959960, Votes:2
Variations to this pattern:
-
To support lazy-loading and multi-threading, we could just use the
synchronized
keyword with thegetInstance()
method. This has a performance hit but will work. -
We can consider variations involving double-checked locking and the
volatile
keyword, but see the limitations of this approach here.
Example: Singleton via MetaProgramming
Groovy’s meta-programming capabilities allow concepts like the singleton pattern to be enacted in a far more fundamental way. This example illustrates a simple way to use Groovy’s meta-programming capabilities to achieve the singleton pattern but not necessarily the most efficient way.
Suppose we want to keep track of the total number of calculations that a calculator performs. One way to do that is to use a singleton for the calculator class and keep a variable in the class with the count.
First we define some base classes. A Calculator
class which performs calculations and records how many such calculations it performs and a Client
class which acts as a facade to the calculator.
class Calculator {
private total = 0
def add(a, b) { total++; a + b }
def getTotalCalculations() { 'Total Calculations: ' + total }
String toString() { 'Calc: ' + hashCode() }
}
class Client {
def calc = new Calculator()
def executeCalc(a, b) { calc.add(a, b) }
String toString() { 'Client: ' + hashCode() }
}
Now we can define and register a MetaClass which intercepts all attempts to create a Calculator
object and always provides a pre-created instance instead. We also register this MetaClass with the Groovy system:
class CalculatorMetaClass extends MetaClassImpl {
private static final INSTANCE = new Calculator()
CalculatorMetaClass() { super(Calculator) }
def invokeConstructor(Object[] arguments) { return INSTANCE }
}
def registry = GroovySystem.metaClassRegistry
registry.setMetaClass(Calculator, new CalculatorMetaClass())
Now we use instances of our Client
class from within a script. The client class will attempt to create new instances of the calculator but will always get the singleton.
def client = new Client()
assert 3 == client.executeCalc(1, 2)
println "$client, $client.calc, $client.calc.totalCalculations"
client = new Client()
assert 4 == client.executeCalc(2, 2)
println "$client, $client.calc, $client.calc.totalCalculations"
Here is the result of running this script (your hashcode values may vary):
Client: 7306473, Calc: 24230857, Total Calculations: 1 Client: 31436753, Calc: 24230857, Total Calculations: 2
Guice Example
We can also implement the Singleton Pattern using Guice.
Consider the Calculator example again.
Guice is a Java-oriented framework that supports Interface-Oriented design. Hence we create a Calculator
interface first. We can then create our CalculatorImpl
implementation and a Client
object which our script will interact with. The Client
class isn’t strictly needed for this example but allows us to show that non-singleton instances are the default. Here is the code:
@Grapes([@Grab('aopalliance:aopalliance:1.0'), @Grab('com.google.code.guice:guice:1.0')])
import com.google.inject.*
interface Calculator {
def add(a, b)
}
class CalculatorImpl implements Calculator {
private total = 0
def add(a, b) { total++; a + b }
def getTotalCalculations() { 'Total Calculations: ' + total }
String toString() { 'Calc: ' + hashCode() }
}
class Client {
@Inject Calculator calc
def executeCalc(a, b) { calc.add(a, b) }
String toString() { 'Client: ' + hashCode() }
}
def injector = Guice.createInjector (
[configure: { binding ->
binding.bind(Calculator)
.to(CalculatorImpl)
.asEagerSingleton() } ] as Module
)
def client = injector.getInstance(Client)
assert 3 == client.executeCalc(1, 2)
println "$client, $client.calc, $client.calc.totalCalculations"
client = injector.getInstance(Client)
assert 4 == client.executeCalc(2, 2)
println "$client, $client.calc, $client.calc.totalCalculations"
Note the @Inject
annotation in the Client
class. We can always tell right in the source code which fields will be injected.
In this example we chose to use an explicit binding. All of our dependencies (ok, only one in this example at the moment) are configured in the binding. The Guide injector knows about the binding and injects the dependencies as required when we create objects. For the singleton pattern to hold, you must always use Guice to create your instances. Nothing shown so far would stop you creating another instance of the calculator manually using new CalculatorImpl() which would of course violate the desired singleton behaviour.
In other scenarios (though probably not in large systems), we could choose to express dependencies using annotations, such as the following example shows:
@Grapes([@Grab('aopalliance:aopalliance:1.0'), @Grab('com.google.code.guice:guice:1.0')])
import com.google.inject.*
@ImplementedBy(CalculatorImpl)
interface Calculator {
// as before ...
}
@Singleton
class CalculatorImpl implements Calculator {
// as before ...
}
class Client {
// as before ...
}
def injector = Guice.createInjector()
// ...
Note the @Singleton
annotation on the CalculatorImpl
class and the @ImplementedBy
annotation in the Calculator
interface.
When run, the above example (using either approach) yields (your hashcode values will vary):
Client: 8897128, Calc: 17431955, Total Calculations: 1 Client: 21145613, Calc: 17431955, Total Calculations: 2
You can see that we obtained a new client object whenever we asked for an instance but it was injected with the same calculator object.
Spring Example
We can do the Calculator example again using Spring as follows:
@Grapes([@Grab('org.springframework:spring-core:3.2.2.RELEASE'), @Grab('org.springframework:spring-beans:3.2.2.RELEASE')])
import org.springframework.beans.factory.support.*
interface Calculator {
def add(a, b)
}
class CalculatorImpl implements Calculator {
private total = 0
def add(a, b) { total++; a + b }
def getTotalCalculations() { 'Total Calculations: ' + total }
String toString() { 'Calc: ' + hashCode() }
}
class Client {
Client(Calculator calc) { this.calc = calc }
def calc
def executeCalc(a, b) { calc.add(a, b) }
String toString() { 'Client: ' + hashCode() }
}
// Here we 'wire' up our dependencies through the API. Alternatively,
// we could use XML-based configuration or the Grails Bean Builder DSL.
def factory = new DefaultListableBeanFactory()
factory.registerBeanDefinition('calc', new RootBeanDefinition(CalculatorImpl))
def beanDef = new RootBeanDefinition(Client, false)
beanDef.setAutowireMode(AbstractBeanDefinition.AUTOWIRE_AUTODETECT)
factory.registerBeanDefinition('client', beanDef)
def client = factory.getBean('client')
assert 3 == client.executeCalc(1, 2)
println "$client, $client.calc, $client.calc.totalCalculations"
client = factory.getBean('client')
assert 4 == client.executeCalc(2, 2)
println "$client, $client.calc, $client.calc.totalCalculations"
And here is the result (your hashcode values will vary):
Client: 29418586, Calc: 10580099, Total Calculations: 1 Client: 14800362, Calc: 10580099, Total Calculations: 2
State Pattern
The State Pattern provides a structured approach to partitioning the behaviour within complex systems. The overall behaviour of a system is partitioned into well-defined states. Typically, each state is implemented by a class. The overall system behaviour can be determined firstly by knowing the current state of the system; secondly, by understanding the behaviour possible while in that state (as embodied in the methods of the class corresponding to that state).
Example
Here is an example:
class Client {
def context = new Context()
def connect() {
context.state.connect()
}
def disconnect() {
context.state.disconnect()
}
def send_message(message) {
context.state.send_message(message)
}
def receive_message() {
context.state.receive_message()
}
}
class Context {
def state = new Offline(this)
}
class ClientState {
def context
ClientState(context) {
this.context = context
inform()
}
}
class Offline extends ClientState {
Offline(context) {
super(context)
}
def inform() {
println "offline"
}
def connect() {
context.state = new Online(context)
}
def disconnect() {
println "error: not connected"
}
def send_message(message) {
println "error: not connected"
}
def receive_message() {
println "error: not connected"
}
}
class Online extends ClientState {
Online(context) {
super(context)
}
def inform() {
println "connected"
}
def connect() {
println "error: already connected"
}
def disconnect() {
context.state = new Offline(context)
}
def send_message(message) {
println "\"$message\" sent"
}
def receive_message() {
println "message received"
}
}
client = new Client()
client.send_message("Hello")
client.connect()
client.send_message("Hello")
client.connect()
client.receive_message()
client.disconnect()
Here is the output:
offline error: not connected connected "Hello" sent error: already connected message received offline
One of the great things about a dynamic language like Groovy though is that we can take this example and express it in many different ways depending on our particular needs. Some potential variations for this example are shown below.
Variation 1: Leveraging Interface-Oriented Design
One approach we could take is to leverage Interface-Oriented Design. To do this, we could introduce the following interface:
interface State {
def connect()
def disconnect()
def send_message(message)
def receive_message()
}
Then our Client
, Online
and 'Offline` classes could be modified to implement that interface, e.g.:
class Client implements State {
// ... as before ...
}
class Online implements State {
// ... as before ...
}
class Offline implements State {
// ... as before ...
}
You might ask: Haven’t we just introduced additional boilerplate code? Can’t we rely on duck-typing for this? The answer is 'yes' and 'no'. We can get away with duck-typing but one of the key intentions of the state pattern is to partition complexity. If we know that the client class and each state class all satisfy one interface, then we have placed some key boundaries around the complexity. We can look at any state class in isolation and know the bounds of behaviour possible for that state.
We don’t have to use interfaces for this, but it helps express the intent of this particular style of partitioning and it helps reduce the size of our unit tests (we would have to have additional tests in place to express this intent in languages which have less support for interface-oriented design).
Variation 2: Extract State Pattern Logic
Alternatively, or in combination with other variations, we might decide to extract some of our State Pattern logic into helper classes. For example, we could define the following classes in a state pattern package/jar/script:
abstract class InstanceProvider {
static def registry = GroovySystem.metaClassRegistry
static def create(objectClass, param) {
registry.getMetaClass(objectClass).invokeConstructor([param] as Object[])
}
}
abstract class Context {
private context
protected setContext(context) {
this.context = context
}
def invokeMethod(String name, Object arg) {
context.invokeMethod(name, arg)
}
def startFrom(initialState) {
setContext(InstanceProvider.create(initialState, this))
}
}
abstract class State {
private client
State(client) { this.client = client }
def transitionTo(nextState) {
client.setContext(InstanceProvider.create(nextState, client))
}
}
This is all quite generic and can be used wherever we want to introduce the state pattern. Here is what our code would look like now:
class Client extends Context {
Client() {
startFrom(Offline)
}
}
class Offline extends State {
Offline(client) {
super(client)
println "offline"
}
def connect() {
transitionTo(Online)
}
def disconnect() {
println "error: not connected"
}
def send_message(message) {
println "error: not connected"
}
def receive_message() {
println "error: not connected"
}
}
class Online extends State {
Online(client) {
super(client)
println "connected"
}
def connect() {
println "error: already connected"
}
def disconnect() {
transitionTo(Offline)
}
def send_message(message) {
println "\"$message\" sent"
}
def receive_message() {
println "message received"
}
}
client = new Client()
client.send_message("Hello")
client.connect()
client.send_message("Hello")
client.connect()
client.receive_message()
client.disconnect()
You can see here the startFrom
and transitionTo
methods begin to give our example code a DSL feel.
Variation 3: Bring on the DSL
Alternatively, or in combination with other variations, we might decide to fully embrace a Domain Specific Language (DSL) approach to this example.
We can define the following generic helper functions (first discussed here):
class Grammar {
def fsm
def event
def fromState
def toState
Grammar(a_fsm) {
fsm = a_fsm
}
def on(a_event) {
event = a_event
this
}
def on(a_event, a_transitioner) {
on(a_event)
a_transitioner.delegate = this
a_transitioner.call()
this
}
def from(a_fromState) {
fromState = a_fromState
this
}
def to(a_toState) {
assert a_toState, "Invalid toState: $a_toState"
toState = a_toState
fsm.registerTransition(this)
this
}
def isValid() {
event && fromState && toState
}
public String toString() {
"$event: $fromState=>$toState"
}
}
class FiniteStateMachine {
def transitions = [:]
def initialState
def currentState
FiniteStateMachine(a_initialState) {
assert a_initialState, "You need to provide an initial state"
initialState = a_initialState
currentState = a_initialState
}
def record() {
Grammar.newInstance(this)
}
def reset() {
currentState = initialState
}
def isState(a_state) {
currentState == a_state
}
def registerTransition(a_grammar) {
assert a_grammar.isValid(), "Invalid transition ($a_grammar)"
def transition
def event = a_grammar.event
def fromState = a_grammar.fromState
def toState = a_grammar.toState
if (!transitions[event]) {
transitions[event] = [:]
}
transition = transitions[event]
assert !transition[fromState], "Duplicate fromState $fromState for transition $a_grammar"
transition[fromState] = toState
}
def fire(a_event) {
assert currentState, "Invalid current state '$currentState': passed into constructor"
assert transitions.containsKey(a_event), "Invalid event '$a_event', should be one of ${transitions.keySet()}"
def transition = transitions[a_event]
def nextState = transition[currentState]
assert nextState, "There is no transition from '$currentState' to any other state"
currentState = nextState
currentState
}
}
Now we can define and test our state machine like this:
class StatePatternDslTest extends GroovyTestCase {
private fsm
protected void setUp() {
fsm = FiniteStateMachine.newInstance('offline')
def recorder = fsm.record()
recorder.on('connect').from('offline').to('online')
recorder.on('disconnect').from('online').to('offline')
recorder.on('send_message').from('online').to('online')
recorder.on('receive_message').from('online').to('online')
}
void testInitialState() {
assert fsm.isState('offline')
}
void testOfflineState() {
shouldFail{
fsm.fire('send_message')
}
shouldFail{
fsm.fire('receive_message')
}
shouldFail{
fsm.fire('disconnect')
}
assert 'online' == fsm.fire('connect')
}
void testOnlineState() {
fsm.fire('connect')
fsm.fire('send_message')
fsm.fire('receive_message')
shouldFail{
fsm.fire('connect')
}
assert 'offline' == fsm.fire('disconnect')
}
}
This example isn’t an exact equivalent of the others. It doesn’t use predefined Online
and Offline
classes. Instead it defines the entire state machine on the fly as needed. See the previous reference for more elaborate examples of this style.
See also: Model-based testing using ModelJUnit
Strategy Pattern
The Strategy Pattern allows you to abstract away particular algorithms from their usage. This allows you to easily swap the algorithm being used without having to change the calling code. The general form of the pattern is:
In Groovy, because of its ability to treat code as a first class object using anonymous methods (which we loosely call Closures), the need for the strategy pattern is greatly reduced. You can simply place algorithms inside Closures.
Example
First let’s look at the traditional way of encapsulating the Strategy Pattern.
interface Calc {
def execute(n, m)
}
class CalcByMult implements Calc {
def execute(n, m) { n * m }
}
class CalcByManyAdds implements Calc {
def execute(n, m) {
def result = 0
n.times{
result += m
}
result
}
}
def sampleData = [
[3, 4, 12],
[5, -5, -25]
]
Calc[] multiplicationStrategies = [
new CalcByMult(),
new CalcByManyAdds()
]
sampleData.each{ data ->
multiplicationStrategies.each { calc ->
assert data[2] == calc.execute(data[0], data[1])
}
}
Here we have defined an interface Calc
which our concrete strategy classes will implement (we could also have used an abstract class). We then defined two algorithms for doing simple multiplication: CalcByMult
the normal way, and CalcByManyAdds using only addition (don’t try this one using negative numbers - yes we could fix this but it would just make the example longer). We then use normal polymorphism to invoke the algorithms.
Here is the Groovier way to achieve the same thing using Closures:
def multiplicationStrategies = [
{ n, m -> n * m },
{ n, m -> def result = 0; n.times{ result += m }; result }
]
def sampleData = [
[3, 4, 12],
[5, -5, -25]
]
sampleData.each{ data ->
multiplicationStrategies.each { calc ->
assert data[2] == calc(data[0], data[1])
}
}
Template Method Pattern
The Template Method Pattern abstracts away the details of several algorithms. The generic part of an algorithm is contained within a base class. Particular implementation details are captured within base classes. The generic pattern of classes involved looks like this:
Example
In this example, Accumulator
captures the essence of the accumulation algorithm. The base classes Sum
and Product
provide particular customised ways to use the generic accumulation algorithm.
abstract class Accumulator {
protected initial
abstract doAccumulate(total, v)
def accumulate(values) {
def total = initial
values.each { v -> total = doAccumulate(total, v) }
total
}
}
class Sum extends Accumulator {
def Sum() { initial = 0 }
def doAccumulate(total, v) { total + v }
}
class Product extends Accumulator {
def Product() { initial = 1 }
def doAccumulate(total, v) { total * v }
}
println new Sum().accumulate([1,2,3,4])
println new Product().accumulate([1,2,3,4])
The resulting output is:
10 24
In this particular case, you could use Groovy’s inject method to achieve a similar result using Closures:
Closure addAll = { total, item -> total += item }
def accumulated = [1, 2, 3, 4].inject(0, addAll)
println accumulated // => 10
Thanks to duck-typing, this would also work with other objects which support an add (plus() in Groovy) method, e.g.:
In this particular case, you could use Groovy’s inject method to achieve a similar result using Closures:
accumulated = [ "1", "2", "3", "4" ].inject("", addAll)
println accumulated // => "1234"
We could also do the multiplication case as follows:
Closure multAll = { total, item -> total *= item }
accumulated = [1, 2, 3, 4].inject(1, multAll)
println accumulated // => 24
Using closures this way looks more like the Strategy Pattern but if we realise that the built-in inject method is the generic part of the algorithm for our template method, then the Closures become the customised parts of the template method pattern.
Visitor Pattern
The Visitor Pattern is one of those well-known but not often used patterns. I think this is strange, as it is really a nice thing.
The goal of the pattern is to separate an algorithm from an object structure. A practical result of this separation is the ability to add new operations to existing object structures without modifying those structures.
Simple Example
This example considers how to calculate the bounds of shapes (or collections of shapes). Our first attempt uses the traditional visitor pattern. We will see a more Groovy way to do this shortly.
abstract class Shape { }
class Rectangle extends Shape {
def x, y, width, height
Rectangle(x, y, width, height) {
this.x = x; this.y = y; this.width = width; this.height = height
}
def union(rect) {
if (!rect) return this
def minx = [rect.x, x].min()
def maxx = [rect.x + width, x + width].max()
def miny = [rect.y, y].min()
def maxy = [rect.y + height, y + height].max()
new Rectangle(minx, miny, maxx - minx, maxy - miny)
}
def accept(visitor) {
visitor.visit_rectangle(this)
}
}
class Line extends Shape {
def x1, y1, x2, y2
Line(x1, y1, x2, y2) {
this.x1 = x1; this.y1 = y1; this.x2 = x2; this.y2 = y2
}
def accept(visitor){
visitor.visit_line(this)
}
}
class Group extends Shape {
def shapes = []
def add(shape) { shapes += shape }
def remove(shape) { shapes -= shape }
def accept(visitor) {
visitor.visit_group(this)
}
}
class BoundingRectangleVisitor {
def bounds
def visit_rectangle(rectangle) {
if (bounds)
bounds = bounds.union(rectangle)
else
bounds = rectangle
}
def visit_line(line) {
def line_bounds = new Rectangle(line.x1, line.y1, line.x2-line.y1, line.x2-line.y2)
if (bounds)
bounds = bounds.union(line_bounds)
else
bounds = line_bounds
}
def visit_group(group) {
group.shapes.each { shape -> shape.accept(this) }
}
}
def group = new Group()
group.add(new Rectangle(100, 40, 10, 5))
group.add(new Rectangle(100, 70, 10, 5))
group.add(new Line(90, 30, 60, 5))
def visitor = new BoundingRectangleVisitor()
group.accept(visitor)
bounding_box = visitor.bounds
println bounding_box.dump()
That took quite a bit of code.
We can improve the clarity of our code (and make it about half the size) by making use of Groovy Closures as follows:
abstract class Shape {
def accept(Closure yield) { yield(this) }
}
class Rectangle extends Shape {
def x, y, w, h
def bounds() { this }
def union(rect) {
if (!rect) return this
def minx = [ rect.x, x ].min()
def maxx = [ rect.x + w, x + w ].max()
def miny = [ rect.y, y ].min()
def maxy = [ rect.y + h, y + h ].max()
new Rectangle(x:minx, y:miny, w:maxx - minx, h:maxy - miny)
}
}
class Line extends Shape {
def x1, y1, x2, y2
def bounds() {
new Rectangle(x:[x1, x2].min(), y:[y1, y2].min(), w:(x2 - x1).abs(), h:(y2 - y1).abs())
}
}
class Group {
def shapes = []
def leftShift(shape) { shapes += shape }
def accept(Closure yield) { shapes.each{it.accept(yield)} }
}
def group = new Group()
group << new Rectangle(x:100, y:40, w:10, h:5)
group << new Rectangle(x:100, y:70, w:10, h:5)
group << new Line(x1:90, y1:30, x2:60, y2:5)
def bounds
group.accept{ bounds = it.bounds().union(bounds) }
println bounds.dump()
Advanced Example
interface Visitor {
void visit(NodeType1 n1)
void visit(NodeType2 n2)
}
interface Visitable {
void accept(Visitor visitor)
}
class NodeType1 implements Visitable {
Visitable[] children = new Visitable[0]
void accept(Visitor visitor) {
visitor.visit(this)
for(int i = 0; i < children.length; ++i) {
children[i].accept(visitor)
}
}
}
class NodeType2 implements Visitable {
Visitable[] children = new Visitable[0]
void accept(Visitor visitor) {
visitor.visit(this)
for(int i = 0; i < children.length; ++i) {
children[i].accept(visitor)
}
}
}
class NodeType1Counter implements Visitor {
int count = 0
void visit(NodeType1 n1) {
count++
}
void visit(NodeType2 n2){}
}
If we now use NodeType1Counter
on a tree like this:
NodeType1 root = new NodeType1()
root.children = new Visitable[2]
root.children[0] = new NodeType1()
root.children[1] = new NodeType2()
Then we have one NodeType1
object as root and one of the children is also a NodeType1
instance. The other child is a NodeType2
instance. That means using NodeType1Counter
here should count 2 NodeType1
objects.
As you can see here very good we have a visitor that has a state while the tree of objects is not changed. That’s pretty useful in different areas, for example you could have a visitor counting all node types, or how many different types are used, or you could use methods special to the node to gather information about the tree and much more.
In this case we have to do much work.. we have to change Visitor to accept the new type, we have to write the new type itself of course and we have to change every Visitor we have already implemented. After very few changes you will modify all your Visitors to extend a default implementation of the visitor, so you don’t need to change every Visitor each time you add a new type.
Then you have a problem. since the node describes how to iterate, you have no influence and stop iteration at a point or change the order. So maybe we should change this a little to this:
interface Visitor {
void visit(NodeType1 n1)
void visit(NodeType2 n2)
}
class DefaultVisitor implements Visitor{
void visit(NodeType1 n1) {
for(int i = 0; i < n1.children.length; ++i) {
n1.children[i].accept(this)
}
}
void visit(NodeType2 n2) {
for(int i = 0; i < n2.children.length; ++i) {
n2.children[i].accept(this)
}
}
}
interface Visitable {
void accept(Visitor visitor)
}
class NodeType1 implements Visitable {
Visitable[] children = new Visitable[0]
void accept(Visitor visitor) {
visitor.visit(this)
}
}
class NodeType2 implements Visitable {
Visitable[] children = new Visitable[0];
void accept(Visitor visitor) {
visitor.visit(this)
}
}
class NodeType1Counter extends DefaultVisitor {
int count = 0
void visit(NodeType1 n1) {
count++
super.visit(n1)
}
}
Some small changes but with big effect… the visitor is now recursive and tells me how to iterate. The implementation in the Nodes is minimized to visitor.visit(this)
, DefaultVisitor
is now able to catch the new types, we can stop iteration by not delegating to super. Of course the big disadvantage now is that it is no longer iterative, but you can’t get all the benefits.
The question now is how to make that a bit more Groovy. Didn’t you find this visitor.visit(this)
strange? Why is it there? The answer is to simulate double dispatch. In Java the compile time type is used, so when I visitor.visit(children[i])
then the compiler won’t be able to find the correct method, because Visitor
does not contain a method visit(Visitable)
. And even if it would, we would like to visit the more special methods with NodeType1
or NodeType2
.
Now Groovy is not using the static type, Groovy uses the runtime type. This means I could do visitor.visit(children[i])
directly. Hmm.. since we minimized the accept method to just do the double dispatch part and since the runtime type system of Groovy will already cover that.. do we need the accept method? I think you can guess that I would answer no. But we can do more. We had the disadvantage of not knowing how to handle unknown tree elements. We had to extends the interface Visitor
for that, resulting in changes to DefaultVisitor
and then we have the task to provide a useful default like iterating the node or not doing anything at all. Now with Groovy we can catch that case by adding a visit(Visitable)
method that does nothing. That would be the same in Java btw.
But don’t let us stop here… do we need the Visitor
interface? If we don’t have the accept method, then we don’t need the Visitor
interface at all. So the new code would be:
class DefaultVisitor {
void visit(NodeType1 n1) {
n1.children.each { visit(it) }
}
void visit(NodeType2 n2) {
n2.children.each { visit(it) }
}
void visit(Visitable v) { }
}
interface Visitable { }
class NodeType1 implements Visitable {
Visitable[] children = []
}
class NodeType2 implements Visitable {
Visitable[] children = []
}
class NodeType1Counter extends DefaultVisitor {
int count = 0
void visit(NodeType1 n1) {
count++
super.visit(n1)
}
}
Looks like we saved a few lines of code here. But we made more. The Visitable
nodes now do not refer to any Visitor
class or interface. For me this is the best level of separation you could get here. But do we really need to stop here? No. Let us change the Visitable
interface a little and let it return the children we want to visit next. This allows us a general iteration method.
class DefaultVisitor {
void visit(Visitable v) {
doIteraton(v)
}
void doIteraton(Visitable v) {
v.children.each {
visit(it)
}
}
}
interface Visitable {
Visitable[] getChildren()
}
class NodeType1 implements Visitable {
Visitable[] children = []
}
class NodeType2 implements Visitable {
Visitable[] children = []
}
class NodeType1Counter extends DefaultVisitor {
int count = 0
void visit(NodeType1 n1) {
count++
super.visit(n1)
}
}
DefaultVisitor
now looks a bit different. I added a doIteration
method that will get the children it should iterate over and then call visit on each element. Per default this will call visit(Visitable)
which then iterates over the children of this child. I changed Visitable
to ensure that any node will be able to return children (even if empty). I didn’t have to change the NodeType1
and NodeType2
class, because the way the children filed was defined already made them a property, which means Groovy is so nice to generate a get method for us. No the really interesting part is NodeType1Counter
, it is interesting because we have not changed it. super.visit(n1)
will now call visit(Visitable)
which will call doIteration
which will start the next level of iteration. So no change. But visit(it)
will call visit(NodeType1)
if it is of type NodeType1
. In fact we don’t need the doIteration
method, we could do that in visit(Visitable)
too, but I thought this variant is better, because it allows us to write a new Visitor
that overwrites visit(Visitable
) for error cases which of course means we must not do super.visit(n1)
but doIteration(n1)
.
In the end we got ~40% less code, a robust and stable architecture and we completely removed the Visitor from the Visitable. I heard about visitor implementations based on Reflection to get a more generic version. Well, with this you see there is really no need to do such thing. If we add new types we don’t need to change anything. It is said that the visitor pattern doesn’t fit extreme programming techniques very well because you need to make changes to so many classes all the time. I think I proved that this is because of Java not because the pattern is bad or something.
There are variants of the Visitor pattern, like the acyclic visitor pattern, that tries to solve the problem of adding new node types with special visitors. I don’t like that very much, it works with casts, catches the ClassCastException
and other nasty things. In the end it tries to solve something we don’t even get with the Groovy version.
One more thing. NodeType1Counter
could be implemented in Java as well. Groovy will recognize the visit methods and call them as needed because DefaultVisitor
is still Groovy and does all the magic.
3.19.2. References
-
Erich Gamma, Richard Helm, Ralph Johnson, John Vlissides (1995). Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley. ISBN 0-201-63361-2.
-
The canonical reference of design patterns.
-
-
Martin Fowler (1999). Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code. Addison-Wesley. ISBN 0-201-48567-2.
-
Joshua Kerievsky (2004). Refactoring To Patterns. Addison-Wesley. ISBN 0-321-21335-1.
-
Eric Freeman, Elisabeth Freeman, Kathy Sierra, Bert Bates (2004). Head First Design Patterns. O’Reilly. ISBN 0-596-00712-4. *A great book to read, informative as well as amusing.
-
Dierk Koenig with Andrew Glover, Paul King, Guillaume Laforge and Jon Skeet (2007). Groovy in Action. Manning. ISBN 1-932394-84-2.
-
Discusses Visitor, Builder and other Patterns.
-
-
Brad Appleton (1999). Pizza Inversion - a Pattern for Efficient Resource Consumption.
-
One of the most frequently used patterns by many software engineers!
-
-
Design Patterns in Dynamic Languages by Neil Ford. Houston Java User’s Group. Examples in Groovy and Ruby. http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/ts-4961-159222.pdf
4. Acknowledgements
4.1. Contributors
The Groovy team would like to thank the contributors of this documentation (in alphabetical order of last/surname):
4.2. License
This work is licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0.